Minority Corruption Resilience in Byzantine Generals With Unknown and Fluctuating Participation

[Anonymous No.52618584]

fudders irreparably, mercilessly, absolutely btfo

[Anonymous No.52618591]

>>52618584
N E E T N O D E S
E
E
T
N
O
D
E
S

[Anonymous No.52618641]

>>52618584
no one cares, LINKcel

[Anonymous No.52619040]

ah so its like that, huh?
>doesnt get it at all

[Anonymous No.52619051]

A Jeet, nip, and chink walk into a bar.

And come up with nothing relevant

[Anonymous No.52619076]

So this kills hbar and their solution to the Byzantine generals problem? Or have I been here too long…

[Anonymous No.52619481]

>>52618584
I mean, on one hand this sounds like interesting work. But on the other hand just read that fucking title and consider that virtually no one on the planet comprehends a sliver of what the fuck is going on. Chainlink really needs to focus on translating this language into something the layman can understand.

[Anonymous No.52619491]

>>52618584
What does this opinion on the eastern Roman Empire have to do with crypto

[Anonymous No.52619499]

>>52618584
>Minority corruption resilience
How can I put this in place in my hometown?

[Please, no more. No.52619556]

Kek. Reminds me of the time biz made a white paper one word at a time. It turned out alright but I don't have it saved

[Anonymous No.52620023]

>>52619481

That is and always was Adelyns massive failure. She had so much to work with but always outsourced everything to twitter and Chainlinkfaggottwinkgod.

Articles and inform graphics or videos explaining even the very basics like what SWIFT is should have been happening.

[Anonymous No.52620093]

>>52619481
>Chainlink really needs to focus on translating this language into something the layman can understand.
why? who gives a shit if they understand it or not

[Anonymous No.52620108]

>bags locked for two years
>unknown and fluctuating participation
?

[Anonymous No.52620132]

>>52618584
Minority Corruption Resilience? Does that mean Chainlink fights against Jewish influence?

[Anonymous No.52620589]

>>52618584
> Minority corruption resilience
Hey, cool it with the anti-semitic remarks

[Anonymous No.52620604]

>>52620023
That's not a relevant as just getting news sources to cover it.

[Anonymous No.52620610]

>>52618584
whatever, we WILL take back constantinople. just you wait

[Anonymous No.52620644]

>>52619040
based Luffy

[Anonymous No.52621103]

>>52618584
Okay Linkies any theories as to why they are researching this stuff?
if you go to https://blog.chain.link/category/research/ there seems to be a lot of research from Dahlia Malkhi (CTO of Link) into stuff like what is in the OP

Does this research help the oracle network, or does it go beyond that into possible new type of blockchain tech / takeover the layer 1 scene, imo this stuff could be 'uge

[Anonymous No.52621752]

>>52621103
recent research implies superior layer 1 consensus algorithm. We could be looking at a smart contract L1 Samson option against methheads.

[Anonymous No.52621782]

>>52621752
>recent research implies
that nothing is getting released for at least 4 more years

[Anonymous No.52621891]

>>52621752
that's what I'm thinking, once CCIP is directing traffic what better way then using chainlink's own superior alien tech L1 for cheap, efficient, and scalable settlement, the team easily has the capabilities and experience to create some disruptive tech and ETH heads are often saying that it would be easier to start fresh then trying to update ETH, plus it's a very eric schmidt like move to dominate the verticals of the industry after already taking most of the oracle market.

[Anonymous No.52623774]

>>52621891
Theyll first couch it as the data availability committee for arbitrum anytrust quorums
Then users will realize that they trust the whole node quorum of chainlink (kyc'd plus anon/neet) more than l1 eth as it has a better performance record (no dao rollback)
This is why dhalia has been pubing on quorums with inconsistent participation

Then users will say they want that over any l1
Because its not only more trustworthy
But also cheaper

Aye walla
Chainlink is the best part of every element of the stack
With the best team behind it
Eth not needed

[Anonymous No.52623794]

>>52623774
To be clear this will only be possible when multiple projects have been running on anytrust quorums for >2years

But by that time it will be like the end of ancient genocidal battles
Everyone will already know link has won
And be on their knees with necks outstretched begging for death

[Anonymous No.52623914]

>>52623794
what are you holding? will link ever see three digits?

[Anonymous No.52623940]

>>52623794
This is effectively trustless smart contract execution without blockchain overhead

In other words, the trustworthyness (either through reputation or economic incentive) is inversely proportional to execution overhead

Since the above research effectively forces perfect trustworthyness on even neet nodes, this is rapidly asymptotic to zero execution costs with chainlink owning the entire value capture part of the stack

[Anonymous No.52623979]

>>52623914
Chainlink

Link will see 3 digits the year ccip launches
Link will see 4 digits the year BAAS anytrust quorums and DAC are native functions of the link node
Link will reach 5 digits the year SAP and docusign's backends default to pure chainlink based smart contracts
Link will reach 6 digits when novel applications we cant imagine right now are the largest publicly held stock type assets based on using near zero cost trust
Just like google and youtube were impossible to imagine before widespread availability of bear zero cost data transmission (the internet)

[Anonymous No.52624035]

Sounds as clear as "Municipal Marmalade Makes Mustafa Mad"

[Anonymous No.52624175]

>>52621103
Theoretically, this allows Chainlink to become a blockchain of blockchains without being a blockchain. In its purest sense, Chainlink nodes are currently also validators/nodes on the underlying network that they operate on. However because Chainlink nodes are all running the same software, those nodes can also communicate amongst themselves. But stepping back, becoming a validator/node on a blockchain can be quite expensive. If you want to decentralize the oracle network, basically you either A. Must begin running a validator on blockchain X or B. be able to create Chainlink nodes that aren’t running on any blockchain but can still participate in consensus. My thought is that, because Chainlink nodes are also nodes on enough blockchains you can create a rule set now that all Chainlink nodes must abide by without jeopardizing the protocol. This might mean, you can spin up a Chainlink node add your stake and basically risk your future fee opportunity until v1 comes out at which point any mistakes mean you get slashed. I don’t know how true this is nor is this any form of advice. But I do know that Chainlink nodes MUST be bidirectional, aka, they must also be Nodes/validators on some blockchain.

[Anonymous No.52625414]

More philosophical theorycrafting academic bullshit?
Lmao

[Anonymous No.52626421]

>>52624175
Interdasting

[Anonymous No.52626528]

>>52623979
>Link will see 3 digits the year ccip launches
10 years

[Anonymous No.52627518]

>>52618584
Those words do not mean anything.

[Anonymous No.52627527]

>>52618584
Wow another blog post. Doesn't change that the project is still two years out from coming out of beta

[Anonymous No.52628912]

>>52618641
>"no one cares"
>says the subhuman cockroach who sits in a discord with a bunch of other low iq esl stockbasher cockroaches 24/7 making hundreds of link fud threads every week

[Anonymous No.52628962]

>>52628912
>>says the subhuman cockroach who sits in a discord with a bunch of other low iq esl stockbasher cockroaches 24/7 making hundreds of link fud threads every week
Proofs?

[Anonymous No.52628984]

>>52618591
FPBP

[Anonymous No.52630649]

Chainlink has like two "nodes"
So there's really more than three nodes in the "decentralized Oracle Network" now? lel
Nobody cares about chainlink nodes. Nobody even cares about Arbitum nodes, there's only like four of those. Ed Felthim couldn't even get his Obama connections to feel it up. Arbitrum has zero demand. Rightly so, as people are still not buying the zero decentralization + weak security + high scalability proposition.
Sure, the contracts may be immutable, but you get censored harder than Trump on twitter
You look around and see plenty of chainlink price feeds, where the token never has and never will be needed. You saw limited demand for VRF during the 2021 NFT hype, but going forward VRF demand is falling off a cliff.
Anons want you to believe 'The Truth is Out There'
They like to poast a few lazy lines about how chainlink is some subzero meta-layer supra-blockchain of blockchains trustless anytrust quorum trust-minimized magic DAG solution blah blah blah
Even Sergey, the philosophy major, is incapable of deciphering the language behind these poasts. It's mumbo jumno technobable
There is no "blockchain of blockchains"
There is no way around the trilemma proposed by Sir Vitamin Butane - Security + Decentralization + Scalability
Obviously, Bitcoin (ticker:BTC) is by far the most secure and always will. BTC is more decentralized by lightyears. So, all these homosexuals are fighting over "scalablility" knowing damn well their insecurity screams out like a crippled gazelle limping acorss the Lion's savannah
There's no 'decentralization' with Ed Felton's Arbitrim
There's no 'decentralization' with Sergey the scammers so-called "nodes" that do not exist. Where are these "nodes"? There's only like three or four, with Unknown and Fluctuating Participation

[Anonymous No.52630708]

>>52630649
who pays you

[Anonymous No.52630850]

>>52630708
Where are the so-called "DONs"?

[Anonymous No.52631703]

>>52623940
>trustless smart contract execution without blockchain overhead
Hahahahahaha
If it sounds too good to be true, it is
Because there is nothing "trustless" about this whatsoever on crooked Ed Felton's Arbitrum or with the big fat plaid man's 4-9 multisig Chainlink scam, that held substantial portions of their equity in Celsius, as well as Blockfi, not to mention FTX.
You had Sam Bankman-Fried - Sam Bankman-Fried - think of that name - you had *Sam Bankman-Fried* keynoting at Sergey's smart con just a fortnight ago. Smart Con. Think of it...
Smart Con...
You can't even dream this kind of thing up. It writes itself
So, it's not looking good for chainlink, despite what Dahlia Who is pumping out in the blog that nobody will ever read.
Vaporware can have an incredible impact but poor Dahlia is not a Bankman or descended from Bankmen. Even though Sergey is a great scam artist, even he is not a Bankman, so there's no hope