[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 233 KB, 1595x844, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51383844 No.51383844 [Reply] [Original]

It's unequivocally, unironically, and fully over.

>> No.51383863

>>51383844
>September 9th
Old news. They haven't confirmed anything yet.

>> No.51383870

>>51383844
Of course not, it was never for Luna. They confirmed burning Lunc.

>> No.51383876
File: 259 KB, 989x628, SmartSelect_20220911-171648_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51383876

>>51383844
Because the proposals only refer to on-chain burns. Binance has been testing burning small amounts of LUNC already. In other words, fuck off kike.

>> No.51383885

>>51383844
Fud kys

>> No.51383888

>>51383844
They have already confirmed in a video interview with Cz about lunc he said he will do whatever the community wants to support it. Maybe not right off the bat but he is onboard with helping lunc

>> No.51383924

>>51383888
>Maybe not right off the bat but he is onboard with helping lunc
how reassuring

>> No.51383936

>>51383924
>>51383844
Yeah it is you stupid fucking dirty jew.

>> No.51383944

It was clear since July/August.
Only pajeet and normies thought the tax burn was for all the transactions.

>> No.51383947

>>51383924
Die Jew

>> No.51384098
File: 474 KB, 1125x1082, 20220904_201739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51384098

Fuck off human. We LUNC
>bamboomk
now.

>> No.51384227

>>51383863
why would they need to "confirm" it? Do they make an announcement for every fucking coin they list that they won't be adding a tax to it? No.

>> No.51384357

>>51383844
>Binance announces it isn't implement the tax burn
>journalist interprets this as will not
Not only they're the enemy of the people, journalists don't even have a proper grasp of their own language. Bunch of retards lmao

>> No.51384397

>>51383876
where did you hear about test burns anon?

>> No.51384423
File: 76 KB, 640x624, FcRSK5LWQAAA5hb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51384423

>>51383844
fud starting up again, are we pumping or about to pump? *checking chart*

>> No.51384442

>>51384397
It's literally on chain you retard. Plenty of anons here don't need to rely on crypto news to tell them what's going on, we check the chain and figure it out. Go take a look at Coinbases LUNC txns, they are the 3rd largest holder at the moment and have a burn already baked into their test transfers. Literally already in the code for their test txns of lunc.

>> No.51384456

>>51383844
Oh this thread again. Literally all lies with no proof. Semitic hands created this thread. Sorry you missed out bro.

>> No.51384463

>>51384442
Sorry not lunc, wluna. There was a big discussion last night where the txns we're traced and explained. Go find it, we also found out the txns that showed lunc coming from terra classic to eth that showed a ridiculous amount of money (4000x gain arb) were the results of oracle errors. Yw anons it took a while to trace it all.

>> No.51384477

>>51384463
>were the results of oracle errors
Does this mean they were actually transfered or that they just were displayed incorrectly?

>> No.51384496

>>51384463
Wait, does the burn apply to wkuna too? I'm confused. How does a burn of wkuna help lunc?

>> No.51384498

>Article by Liam "Akiba" Wright
>Sept. 9th
I bet you rushed to post this thread thinking you had some breaking news. They're getting desperate. I'm buying more

>> No.51384520

>>51383844
regardless, fuck the exchanges.

>> No.51384548

>>51384442
>>51384463
Jesus fucking christ. This is bullish to such an extent that its better that people don't find out before the 20th.

>> No.51384563

>>51384477
The tokens were transferred however I was able to find them sitting in the wallets they were originally transferred to sitting as the appropriate token still in the wallet.

>> No.51384582

Here's the thread with my findings.
>>51370173
Not op but I was the one digging. I'll hang around if you guys have an questions about what I was seeing.

>> No.51384587

>>51383844
>It's unequivocally, unironically, and fully over.

Now the delusion shines with all its intensity. It's pretty obvious now. The same people who claimed that CZ would burn trading now say that he hasn't confirmed anything yet, as if he had to explicitly confirm he WON'T do it. That's their game, moving the goalposts.

These people are out of reality and need to touch grass. They've become completely psycho. Many of them still can sell now and take profits, but most of them will baghold forever.

>> No.51384595

>>51384442
>>51384463
>>51384563
i read that thread and im confused does it mean WLUNA is going to repeg to 2una?

>> No.51384608

>>51383924
You don’t just blindly implement something without testing it first.

>> No.51384640
File: 24 KB, 400x400, FE36A67E-3644-4836-A65B-76B9E04A1BE5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51384640

>>51384423
Whew mark walburg got fat and grew titties. Gross.

>> No.51384674

>>51384595
So the gist is. Wluna was created for the original Luna to be trade able on Ethereum. 2una does not have a wrapped contract yet. The fud surrounding wluna last week was strange. Also turned out the fud was wrong as the bridge was closed and wlunas price is just fine. My theory is that do Kwon is a corrupt fuck and will exploit the terra ecosystem 3 times. The one we saw with classic, once with wluna being exchangeable for 2una, and a 3rd when they merge(this is going out on a limb and basically saying corruption will reign here). There's a bit more to it and anons have added to it (hell I added to the original anon who posted about it) as new info has come to light. It's mostly speculation driven by on chain data that anons are analyzing, so nothing is for sure....but anons here are right often enough especially with this level of empirical evidence.

>> No.51384729
File: 72 KB, 806x858, cmcfeature.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51384729

>>51384498
Here's the same article featured on CMC, champ.
>>51384456
I bought immediately after the crash. I'm still holding, but what tf do you want me to say. The entire pump relies on Binance implementation.

>> No.51384745

>>51384674
my question is why would they bother with this wluna ? if they need a wrapped 2una why not create a new contract and abandon the old one ?

>> No.51384762

>>51384587
I knew it when the generals became XRP-tier rambling. The only hope now is in a 2UNDA repeg to WLUNA.

>> No.51384840

>>51384729
>3 days ago
Cool, thanks for supporting my point.

>> No.51384896

>>51383844
Liam's priced out

>> No.51384923
File: 176 KB, 828x1792, FcUWQEBXwAE0mAR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51384923

>> No.51384979

>>51384745
Corruption. It'll look like laziness to give them plausible deniability.

>> No.51385074
File: 273 KB, 722x1090, BULLISH AF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51385074

>>51383844
Didn't they backtrack and say they will review it once it goes live on the 20th? Also they have already implemented the Tax on withdrawals and transactions even before the on chain goes live, they just stated that they will not wait until the 20th to implement the burn on transactions and withdrawals and that they're waiting for the on chain before they go full blown scorched earth burn tax. Anyone who read it differently has pajeet level comprehension.

>> No.51385162

>>51384840
what do you expect to have changed in 72 hours?

>>51384923
literally who?

>>51385074
>might review the decision
don't pretend you're betting on anything except a maybe.

>> No.51385222
File: 24 KB, 351x351, 5155.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51385222

>>51385162
>don't pretend you're betting on anything except a maybe.

the science is settled this will moon

>> No.51385231

>>51385162
Every bet is on a maybe. If it were guaranteed, it wouldn’t be a bet

>> No.51385246

>>51385162
Anon they have been testing an auto burn already. You can see their smart contracts burning it, it's kind of like thinking a mining company is buying up all the land in an area for something, you notice it all being bought up, you know the land has a ton of gold on it. The company doesn't directly say they are or aren't buying the land (because that could be construed as manipulating the markets and a big no no, but you go down to the county's records office and pull the purchase records and see the companies name all over the docs. What's happening is this exact thing but with lunc. CZ is a massive lunc bag holder, he can't pump his tokens by using his company to put news out.

>> No.51385479

>>51385222
damn, checked.

>> No.51385489

>>51385222
Checked and Spaderpilled.

>> No.51385495

>>51385246
so what's the point of the initial announcement in >>51385074. Why would the mining company deny they're buying the land, then be like, "well, we'll think about buying the land in the future?"

>> No.51385533

>>51385222
Based Stargate gets

>> No.51385537
File: 308 KB, 1080x1175, Screenshot_20220911_170236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51385537

>>51383876
somebody explain to me how HCC knows the difference between a binance user withdrawing to the burn wallet vs binance hot wallet burning it themselves?

>> No.51385609

>>51385495
Because if someone takes a picture of the documents, it puts the narrative that they might be fake and the releaser is trying to influence the company? Can you really not understand the most basic Jewish tricks in business?

>> No.51385995

>>51385537
imagine the irony if this entire thing is just some retard burning tokens himself

>> No.51386019

>>51383863
>September 9th
That was 3 days ago. What the fuck are you trying to say with this?

>> No.51386046

>>51386019
https://thecryptobasic.com/2022/09/10/binance-says-it-may-review-its-decision-to-implement-terra-luna-classic-lunc-burns-on-trading/

>> No.51386097

Jesus you baggies are dumb as fuck. You want binance to do the work to implement something that is supposed to be built into your shitcoin?

How fucking dumb can you get before you forget how to breathe?

>> No.51386218

>>51386046
so the entire hopes of this project rely on a Binance support line that's probably from Wage#12151, cool.

>> No.51386315

>>51386097
How can any of the lunc holders here be baggies when we're all sitting on a 5x or greater? Do you not understand the vocab you are using? If you want to talk to baggies head on over to reddit, where they were stacking mass supplies of the tokens and everyone lost 99.9999999% of their money. Us here at the 4chinz bought those bags for literal fractions of pennies. The price could be cut in half and we'd all still be in profit.