BINANCE REVIEWING STANCE ON LUNC BURN TAX

[Anonymous No.51376416]

Basically they are considering doing an off-chain burn as well.

https://thecryptobasic.com/2022/09/10/binance-says-it-may-review-its-decision-to-implement-terra-luna-classic-lunc-burns-on-trading/

[Anonymous No.51376494]

>>51376416
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VvwP-bPv6E

[Anonymous No.51376508]

Stick to your cancer general with your shitcoin jeet

[Anonymous No.51376527]

>>51376416
How would it work? Every time someone sells or buys he pays 1.3% tax? Theres no on chain activity except for spam on LUNC. No major volume dapps. Who the fuck wants to trade 1.3% tax crypto? Wouldnt volume dry out and thus hype which means a huge red dildo?

[Anonymous No.51376542]

>>51376416
EVERYONE SELL NOW I WANT TO ACCUMULATE MORE

[Anonymous No.51376580]

>>51376508
Sir it's not a shitcoin and we are from Pakistan not India

[Anonymous No.51376790]

>>51376542
this

[Anonymous No.51376859]

>>51376416
This will increase the buy volume and reduce the sell volume once it's implemented across multiple chains.
Fomo, and people not wanting a 1.2% loss

[Anonymous No.51376886]

IT WAS A SHAKE OUT THE WHOLE TIME

>I HOPE YOU DIDN'T PANIC SELL LMAO

[Anonymous No.51376925]

>crispy article about a day old tweet
>'might' in the future; not actively in the process of doing so
Yeah, I'm thinking OP might be a faggot

[Anonymous No.51377154]

>>51376886
l2 greentext, fuck me im sick of these newfags ill enjoy watching your coin dump

[Anonymous No.51378342]

>>51377154
>90iq
Yeah just what I thought the avg LUNC fudders IQ was, fuck off midwit

[Anonymous No.51379597]

>>51376527
Where have you been? Coins with taxes as high as 10% have exploded before. Safemoon had a 5% tax. Having a tax isn't inherently bad, especially when the entire community are demanding it. Lunc went up 600% in a week. Who the fuck cares about a 1% tax when those are the gains possible?
Shits as dumb as saying eth isn't going to be successful because no-one wants to pay the gas fees.
How poor are you?

[Anonymous No.51379656]

>>51376527
people were literally paying 100s of dollars worth in eth gas fee's before and your complaining about a meager 1.3% tax?
a tax that'll literally increase the value of your own tokens?
i'm angry enough when i'm paying 7-15% slippage fee's on uniswap that is literally money lost for no reason that goes toward nothing.
meanwhile your complaining over a burn tax that'll increase the value of your own lunc tokens exponentially?

[Anonymous No.51379747]

>>51379597
this tokens that have an exponential amount benefit massively from taxes.
this is literally something we all know.
burns do work but only when volume and hype is high.
this is why its key to do burns as early as possible when a coin has attention on them.
this binance/cz shakeout is indeed fucking both cz and us too.
if that fucker just ok'ed the burn like mexc did we'd have pumped past 0.0006 perhaps to 0.001 or higher by now.
he is NO doubt going to agree at some point as he is legit the biggest bagholder outta all of us.
my guess is the fucker is looking at his options and trying to apply every strategy he can think of to secure himself and his friends some extra value out of the pump.
its very scummy from him desu but i can't blame him.
if i knew just one word or action from me could 2x-5x a coin instantly i'd try to benefit from it as much as i can.

[Anonymous No.51379774]

>>51376925
They've been actively testing by sending small amounts to the burn address, but you already knew that, I'm sure. Nigger.