[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 25 KB, 360x232, etf-investment-guide-theme-uranium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51286015 No.51286015 [Reply] [Original]

Anyone in deep with uranium/nuclear energy involved companies?

Could this be the next long term hold? If so, would you recommend investing in the material itself (uranium) or some other material used to power nuclear reactors or the companies themselves?

Discuss

>> No.51286088

>>51286015
ive seen this pop up weeks ago so it might already be to late to buy. which stocks do you suggest? uranium mining?

>> No.51286682

>>51286015
already mooned

>> No.51286707
File: 131 KB, 740x905, FbrK7cYagAAo3fL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51286707

>>51286015
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. You're welcome.

>>51286682
Not even close.

>> No.51287141
File: 130 KB, 355x519, 1651336016894.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51287141

>>51286015
NSMDU

>> No.51287292

>>51286707
Didn't you seehow much commodities have mooned with covid and war?

>> No.51287328
File: 68 KB, 588x726, uranium_breakout_2022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51287328

>>51287292
Have you not charted the ratios and compared it to previous cycles when SPX crashes in relation to PPI? We're still early in the commodities. Coal is rising to ATH $450/ton right now, oil is putting in a floor at $90 and will be heading to $250+/barrel by next year. Uranium is going to $300/pound easy.

>> No.51287864

>>51286015
>Could this be the next long term hold?
this is the next 30+ years of energy investing.
>If so, would you recommend investing in the material itself (uranium) or some other material used to power nuclear reactors or the companies themselves?
by looking for management who aren't liars. aside from that, you can't miss.
>>51286088
what's happening right now is 1) prices are a little ahead of fundamentals 2) youtubers and small-time analysts are making a cash-grab for subscribers; "strike while the iron is hot."
so, there are people out there looking to tie uranium to something sensational. the reality is, it will be a long slow climb from where we are to grid base-load domination.

>> No.51288154

>>51286015
I have invested in Kazatomprom and I am very happy with it.

They already made good money when the market was shit due to in situ leaching.

>> No.51288170

>>51287328
>and compared it to previous cycles when SPX crashes in relation to PPI
why is this ratio important?

>> No.51288374
File: 615 KB, 1029x1150, temp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51288374

>>51286015
What do you think a 50kt nuke would go for on the black market?

>> No.51288962

>>51287328
that looks like even more insane copium than the bitcoin charts that point to a 200k bitcoin in 2022
why would a commodity that has declined by 90% just retrace and do basically a 1500% rise in 5 years? the opposite is way more true, price declines happen quickly and growth happens slowly and tentatively. Uranium top to bottom took 10 years... this would mean at least the same amount of time to come close to the former high.

>> No.51289113

>>51287328
>uranium bag holders are seething
Lmao
Lol even

>> No.51290080

>>51287328
retarded here: what does this graph mean?

>> No.51290340

>>51288962
Bro literally just look at the uranium chart during the GFC ten years ago. Uranium mooned bc all other energy, especially oil was too expensive. We are still very early

>> No.51290358

Invest in thorium mining

>> No.51290361

>>51286707
Also thanks for posting this, I didn't think my broker would let me buy Sprott physical on the otc (mutt) but I discovered I can.

>> No.51290392

>>51290340
Europe is having an energy crisis and nuclear energy is not even considered a solution. Uranium is not a good longterm hold.

>> No.51290417

>>51290392
Good for two month longs though

>> No.51290430

>>51290080
it means that since EU pulled out of nuclear and went balls in on being slaves to russian gas, uranium crashed
when fiat dies and all bureaucrats are dead in a ditch, then you can buy back into it

>> No.51290464

>>51287328
That graph just shows how pathetic is uranium compared to the S&P500.

>> No.51290508

We all agree here that uranium will at some point just moon, and then absolutely crash? Like it will be exactly like a regular stock bubble where the latecomers get absolutely fukked?

>> No.51290561

>>51286088
I've already closed out mine

>> No.51290617

>>51290508
It's like my wife anon. Forever getting fatter and worse. But every once in a while she diets and that's when I bone.

>> No.51292658

>>51286088
CAMECO, or just buy the URA ETF if you dont want to worry about single stocks and diversifying yourself.

Holding:
Cameco (50%)
Uranium Energy (30%)
NAC Kazatomprom (10%)
Paladin (10%)
Nexgen (10%)

Percentages are of my total Uranium holdings, i‘m about 6 figs deep.

>> No.51292707

>>51292658
based
been holding UEC since 0.40

>> No.51292726

>>51290392
That is not true. Its just the germans that are retarded. France is investing HEAVILY into nuclear, china too, though it is obviously not in the EU

>> No.51292749

>>51290617
You sir, are based beyond my wildest dreams

>> No.51292803

>>51292707
Cheers anon, been making good gains on my little urainies too in the past 12 months. Also, my low leverage shorts on the nasdaq and S&P have aged like fine wine. WAGMI by buying non-ESG stock and shorting ze ponzi into the ground

>> No.51292856

>>51287328
question is why aren't people buying uranium since nuclear will be used instead of gas in the future?

>> No.51293019

Uuuu, uec, dnn

>> No.51293783

>>51290430
why should I wait for fiat to die before buying?

>> No.51293833

>>51286015
>>51286088
>>51286682
it's already too late, ive seen multiple threads and posters on /smg/ mentioning uranium now. top signal everytime.