MATIC, FTM, or AVAX?

[Anonymous No.49490641]

Which low-gas L1 for you, /biz? Why?
inb4 buy bitcoin bro

[Anonymous No.49490688]

You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.49491036]

>>49490688
ey?

[Anonymous No.49491073]

>>49490641
Polygon (and Ethereum), obviously: https://polygon.technology/

[Anonymous No.49491088]

>>49490641
MATIC obviously. Polygon is like 10 different project at once. FTM and AVAX are larps.

[Anonymous No.49491089]

>>49490641
Bitcoin (BTC)

[Anonymous No.49491115]

>>49491073
Are you me?

[Anonymous No.49491195]

>>49491115
> Are you me?
Nope, just a fren.

[Anonymous No.49491277]

Avalanche. Literally the best tech right now.

[Anonymous No.49491899]

>>49490641
Algo

[Anonymous No.49492068]

>>49491195
Then we are best frens

[Anonymous No.49492182]

>>49492068

[Anonymous No.49492204]

avax literally just double printed last night and both subnets went offline and have been since. Emin was also spotted flying private jet back to turkey shouting "REVOLUTIONARY CONSENSUS" before boarding.

[Anonymous No.49492232]

>>49490641
out of those matic, but you should also get rose

[Anonymous No.49492280]

Avalanche is actually decentralised. Current NC is 33

[Anonymous No.49492475]

>>49492182

[Anonymous No.49492749]

>>49492475

[Anonymous No.49492839]

>>49492749

[Anonymous No.49492871]

>>49492839

[Anonymous No.49492896]

>>49490641
pyraveum.com

[Anonymous No.49493041]

>>49490641

[Anonymous No.49493049]

>>49492871

[Anonymous No.49493135]

>>49493049

[Anonymous No.49493210]

>>49490641
matic is a L2. you should just buy bitcoin if you can't do even the smallest bit of research

[Anonymous No.49493231]

>>49490641
I’m all in on harmony and I want to die

[Anonymous No.49493242]

>>49490641
MATIC but honestly i'm done with MATIC and going full time AVAX now. MATIC was great and all, but AVAX is just better all around with the upcoming changes to subnets. And its not dependent on ETH like MATIC is.

[Anonymous No.49493278]

>>49493231
Eh, could be worse, fren. Picrel.

[Anonymous No.49493297]

>>49493278
But I put 120k into harmony

[Anonymous No.49493411]

>>49493242
1. Avalance (AVAX) subnets are just glorified rollups, but without the outsourcing that ensure a diverse approach to the problem of transaction processing.
2. Polygon Edge (MATIC) and their upcoming enterprise chains are not dependent on Ethereum (ETH).
3. Just diversify and hold both.

[Anonymous No.49493442]

>>49493135

[Anonymous No.49493454]

>>49493297
Still, Harmony could regain some of its worth during a bullrun, but Bingus Token will never ever be valuable.

[Anonymous No.49493468]

>>49493411
AVAX subnets are just better versions of rollups.

[Anonymous No.49493523]

>>49493442

[Anonymous No.49493534]

>>49493468
> AVAX subnets are just better versions of rollups.
Make your case.

[Anonymous No.49493611]

>>49490641
Cardano because I'm white

[Anonymous No.49493614]

>>49493534
https://youtu.be/g9IZEkwbglI
19:27
The man himself will answer for you. He’s made rollups. He knows all about them. They’re fucking ass compared to what he’s doing.

[Anonymous No.49493724]

>>49493534

Also here
>>49492993

[Anonymous No.49493972]

>>49491073
Avax, a real novel consensus protocol and great developers
I wouldn't trust polygon with more than 1000 dollars and ftm is only faster timed ethereum

[Anonymous No.49494007]

>>49493614
Yeah no, there are several work arounds for the liqudity and interop issues he considers to be fundamental of L2s:
- https://docs.starkware.co/starkex-v4/starkex-deep-dive/defi-pooling
- https://loopring.org/#/post/damm-distributed-amm
- https://medium.com/starkware/caspian-an-l2-powered-amm-f20e93b5421
The end game of these being fully cross-chain applications enabled by Connext and their arbitrary message passing:
- https://www.connext.network/#625548e99726785ff8de50ef
- https://blog.connext.network/how-to-build-cross-chain-apps-xapps-45cf2705d17e

> But that will also make it easier to go from Avalanche to Ethereum (L2s)
Good, that way I can stay on the most secure network (which objectively is Ethereum) and still have access to everything.

[Anonymous No.49494076]

>>49491088
>>49493972
> MATIC obviously. Polygon is like 10 different project at once.
Among these: privacy, an area infinitely more important than scalability yet left completely unexplored by both Fantom and Avalanche.

Also, checked.

[Anonymous No.49494080]

>>49494007
Lmao connext!? You really are just a mETH head if you think connext will save ETH more than AVAX.

[Anonymous No.49494154]

gotta be NEAR for me chief, they got hella fund to sustain through the bear, so I can defo see it being around for the next bull.

even if it only reaches ath the next run, would still do a decent 4x

[Anonymous No.49494157]

Fantom. The FVM updates are already happening. It is STILL very undervalued. And I believe UAE will come through and be huge as well. I do like both Matic and Avax to come out of this fog of war as well. There is room for a few.

[Anonymous No.49494173]

>>49494076
you can debate the purpose of private smart contracts but also avalanche can add a privacy rollup quicker than you can say double spend

[Anonymous No.49494242]

>>49494080
> you think connext will save ETH
You're not too bright if you think a network with ties to DC Comics, Disney, Warner Bros and Ernst & Young needs saving:
- https://medium.com/veve-collectibles/veve-welcomes-immutable-x-807097d57057
- https://www.ey.com/en_gl/news/2021/09/ey-announces-integration-with-polygon-protocol-and-framework-on-ethereum-scaling-solutions
- https://polygon.technology/solutions/polygon-nightfall/

[Anonymous No.49494334]

>>49494173
> avalanche can add a privacy rollup quicker than you can say double spend
They aren't though, you'd think they would have realized the value of being first by now, but I guess not.

[Anonymous No.49494410]

>>49494242
You mean the network that tied with stakenet XSN?

[Anonymous No.49494616]

>>49494410
> You mean the network that tied with stakenet XSN?
No, while Stakenet is (seemingly) based on Connext Network, I was obviously talking about Ethereum, which both Immutable X and Polygon Nightfall use for settlement.

[Anonymous No.49495244]

>>49494334
the value of being first in a market where shiba inu exists.

[Anonymous No.49497609]

>>49490641

[Anonymous No.49498316]

>>49492280
Decentralization won't matter until the current populance takes up arms to end the current system. There will be no peaceful transfer of financial systems. Until that starts to happen, no one should care about NC. In fact, the lower the NC, the more you should expect from a project.

[Anonymous No.49498459]

>>49497609
rekt by fat fingers, rip

[Anonymous No.49498475]

Metis

[Anonymous No.49499253]

>>49498316
>decentralization doesn't matter
>in fact more centralization is better

[Anonymous No.49499879]

>>49490641
>MATIC
shit
>FTM
failed tranny coin
>AVAX
yes

[Anonymous No.49500028]

buy ftm

[Anonymous No.49500184]

>>49490641
Big question is, which of these doesn't shit the bad when a big drop in the market happens or bots swarm a protocol or when some gay ass play-to-earn game gets hyped by pajeets?
Hint: some of these already happened

[Anonymous No.49502490]

>>49493231
Lel

[Anonymous No.49503988]

>>49490641
As far as L1s are concerned, I'm placing my bets on Lamina1 and Candle Chain. Both of those chains are designed from the ground up to host metaverses.

[Anonymous No.49504507]

MATIC
>20 min finality
>2 validators can take down the chain (centralised af)
>can't scale validator set (quadratic complexity consensus protrocol)
>daily 100tx+ reorgs
>whole TVL secured by a 5/8 multi-sig in which team control 4/8

FTM
>classical consensus (can't scale validator set)
>centralised - 2 nodes halted the entire chain
>Andre was the only value proposition
>no long-term scaling solution

AVAX
>sub-second finality
>zero downtime in 15 months
>near-unlimited validator set
>near-unlimited horizontal scaling
>VM agnostic
>fixed supply
>fees burned

the answer is clear

[Anonymous No.49504533]

matic is the only chain worth giving a damn about. although honestly none of these are the play. look into DAOs and bitDAO. 1.5b in the treasury ain't nothing to mess with.

[Anonymous No.49504782]

>>49500028
>buy ftm
oh no you got rugged lol check chart

[Anonymous No.49505261]

>>49504507
Yeah blatantly lying about ftm lol. Never change roach.

[Anonymous No.49505341]

>>49505261
which bit is a lie - pray tell

[Anonymous No.49505596]

>>49505341
>classical consensus (can't scale validator set)
>centralised - 2 nodes halted the entire chain
>Andre was the only value proposition
>no long-term scaling solution

All 4 of your points are absolute bullshit.

[Anonymous No.49505670]

>>49505596