[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1.30 MB, 777x777, 1582840889838.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49459232 No.49459232 [Reply] [Original]

Anyone else here /notstaking/? Ive held my LINK patently for over 5 years. I sure as hell aint giving it to them now. Ide stake a small percent of my stack on LPL and thats about that. It cant be just me, but there is something fishy going on with the first 75mil.

>> No.49459268

>>49459232
Im not an og yet

>> No.49459319

Ill stake as soon as i can as much as i can. There is nothing fishy about it you are just a fucking schizo.

>> No.49459321

>>49459232
If they’re giving precedence to long term holders I’m putting all 30k from 2017 in there. That’s what they’re for.

>> No.49459360

>>49459321
precedence to long term lpl holders or link holders?

>> No.49459498
File: 31 KB, 720x590, Screenshot_20220607-195343_CoinStats.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49459498

>>49459232
Partially autistic n fully untarded here. Fwiw its clear to me that hope is futile and has negative long term health effects. I don't expect a return from sir gay any more than getting social security checks in 2059. I embrace hopelessness and accepted my fate as a pleb and now I am free, unironically. Maybe my grandkids will make it but even that is a slippery slope to ponder.
T>10k link maureen

>> No.49459570

>>49459360
Link holders.

>> No.49459604

>>49459232
staking is for midwits
imagine not being able to make more than 5% a year trading

>> No.49459605

>>49459360
Why the fuck would they give precedence for Lpl over link lol are you dumb?

>> No.49459717
File: 825 KB, 786x866, sergeyfinalmoments.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49459717

>>49459232
I'll stick with bancor given it's way more than 5% and it's here now.

>> No.49459764

>>49459232
Wanna know how I know that you’re lying?

>> No.49459798

>>49459319
Maybe. But LINK schizos have been right about pretty much EVERYTHING. This was not an accident.

>> No.49459829
File: 105 KB, 468x288, 1566189780900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49459829

>>49459764
Im not lying. Im just extra cautious about my LINK. Its around 90% of my entire networth.

>> No.49459858

>trying to subtly shill LPL
lmao fuck off to your horse rimmer

>> No.49459875

>>49459232
10k was the make it stack so you could sell 3k at $1000, stake 3k for $150-300k in passive income, and have 4K in cold storage for event of $81k madness or a staking failure which lost your original staked link

>> No.49460651

>>49459232
Locking it up until 0.1 becomes 1.0 is a risk but, as an OG, don't you have enough LINK that selling half near the top will give you fuck you money? Why not stake half for the emissions?

The risk is that you'd be locking it up for an indeterminate amount of time and possibly incurring a massive opportunity cost.

>> No.49460739

>>49460651
I held all the way to bottom, I do not see light until I was a man

>> No.49460806

>>49460651
I psyoped myself into hodling since 2017, what’s another 5 years?

>> No.49460872

i think the first wave of stakers will still make some decent profits, i doubt think much will go wrong with it and that it'll be low risk/mid reward. but that's just my 2 cents, anything could happen.

if i am lucky enough to stake in this first wave, i would like to join in. but just like chainlink is rolling out staking slow, i would be dipping my toes into it slowly too. i think going all in would be wreckless, and maybe impossible since there is a cap in the v0.1. but that isn't to say that there's anything wrong with going all in either as i know there will be a lot of people eager to do just that.

>> No.49460952

>>49459232
Whats with the confidence? Did they already announce staking? Consensus isnt here yet.

>> No.49460976

i have 25k link that hasnt moved since early 2018

do i qualify to stake?

>> No.49460987

>>49460952
It’s announcement of announcement but at least u get a clearer idea of what staking is

>> No.49461029
File: 49 KB, 440x356, Screen Shot 2017-10-14 at 11.56.30 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461029

>>49459232
OG from 2017 in here as well i have about 50k link left i wont stake ANYTHING

ill let someone else lose all there link because of some faulty node that wanted to be dishonest...


dont trust ANYONE WITH MY LINKIES THIS EARLY


pic related the post that made me put about 10K into link at .23 cents

and also gonna cap this when anons lose there link of no fault of their own

>> No.49461031

>>49460952
Check the blog

>> No.49461090

>>49461029
there is no slashing for v0.1 but ok

>> No.49461131
File: 103 KB, 939x994, x 26.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461131

>>49459232
I'm planning on hanging back first to see how the staking goes for everyone else, in case there are any complications or hacks with the nodes that cause people to lose their staked LINK.

>> No.49461142
File: 81 KB, 740x522, 1513898747343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461142

>>49461031
>>49460987
holy fuck holy fuck its happening oh my god its almost here oh fuck oh man ive been waiting 5 years for this

>> No.49461189
File: 128 KB, 983x1146, 7AF80E9E-C556-4A7A-90FF-BDEE9FAAD9EC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461189

>>49461090
Came here to say this

>> No.49461207
File: 245 KB, 1200x2000, 1620174862353.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461207

>>49459232

I keep my entire net worth on celsius, including my full stack of >10000 linkies

>> No.49461315

>>49459232
>I don't trust lord Sirgay but I trust jonneh the horse whisperer
Lpl shill not even trying

>> No.49461345

>>49459321
Same. I only trust Chainlink with the tokens anyway. Too chickenshit to consider any other pools.

>> No.49461370

>>49459717
What the hell? Was like 2% a few days ago.

>> No.49461382

>>49461090
Delet this

>> No.49461390

>>49461029
You can stake directly with Chainlink anon. And the rewards are coming directly from their wallet.

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-roadmap/

READ NIGGA READ.

>> No.49461431
File: 308 KB, 700x1050, 1606329289484.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461431

Im OG link marine corporal
been hodling my meger stack since 2017
this is a fucking hodl, holy shit. reading shit like this >>49461029
really tests my mettle, just a few more years.....right.......right marines?

>> No.49461439

>>49461029
Blessed by Kek

>> No.49461552

>>49459232
I will only use a staking platform provided by the chainlink team. I'm sure as hell not going to use any 3rd party shit. But if Sergey offers me staking I'm going all in

>> No.49461610

>>49461370
10% when you consider you can just swap all the bnt for link as and when you want

>> No.49461736
File: 1.56 MB, 3103x1454, 1630174010979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49461736

>>49459232
If you can't trust the LINK team with your tokens, then all the reasons you believe you hold a valuable asset are lies. Think on this.

>> No.49462144

>>49459232
100% retard take

>> No.49462166

>>49461610
Except bancor is a massive risk

>> No.49462234

I keep mine on ftx for 5%. So no, likely not.

>> No.49462265

>>49459232
The Jewish plan to get our link is to entice us with staking and then hack it so they can steal our link

>> No.49462371

They are specifically targeting early holders and there is specifically no loss protection. Expect a "bug" which does as little damage to Chainlink's reputation as possible while extracting the maximum number of linkies from OGs as possible.

>> No.49462728

They will sacrifice reputation of one or two major chainlink nodes to steel the linkies

>> No.49463098

>every anon seems to have huge stacks
Is 10k enough? I can afford more, but it feels risky throwing my fiat into crypto right now

>> No.49463177

>>49463098
No gutz, no glory.

>> No.49463233

>>49459717
Is someone training a version of dalle where they’re manually inputting things like Sergey_Nazorov = “{fat, man, plaid, morbidly_obese}?

>> No.49463284

>>49462371
There's no slashing at v0.1, anon.

>> No.49463323
File: 864 KB, 783x862, sergeypredator.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49463323

>>49463233
No, but they should. I just have a secret phrase that faithfully produces accurate sergeys.

>> No.49463447
File: 162 KB, 813x854, Screenshot_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49463447

wtf dalle

>> No.49463480

>>49463177
But its 8$ a pop, and btc still has the potential to go down 30%, or more, crypto hasnt really gone through an economic meltdown yet.

>> No.49463506

>>49463480
It’s glaringly obvious by now that btc purpose and only usecase is to suppress link

>> No.49463534

>>49463098
Some of us have been holding since it was cents. Just buy what you can, it will pay off eventually

>> No.49463818

>>49460806
i want my cock to work by the time i make it. i will not do another five years

>> No.49464954

>>49462166
how

>> No.49465253

Can anyone answer this?

https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49454640/#49454640

>The initial plan, a few months in, is to reward 5% for 75M staked. Out of ~400M circulating. For one (1) single feed. Which will later be scaled up to all feeds.

>How can they do 5% off of one feed?

Is this subsidy or is this baseless? Any sources?

>> No.49465273

>>49462166
how?

>> No.49465374

>>49465253
blog post mentioned subsidy

>> No.49465444
File: 521 KB, 853x1000, 1654305827446.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49465444

>>49461029
You earned your gigaChad status for life, king.

>> No.49465614

>>49461029
based ballsy-motherfucker

>> No.49465826

>>49459875
this