https://market.link/overview

[Anonymous No.49408361]

IT'S UP

[Anonymous No.49408372]

>>49408361
Does this mean staking soon?

[Anonymous No.49408384]

>>49408361
WOOO YEAAA THAT STAKING METRICS PAGE LOOKS NICE

[Anonymous No.49408393]

Damn nice might hit $9 by 2024 stinkers aahahahahhahahh

[Anonymous No.49408396]

What does this mean? Steaking soon

[Anonymous No.49408406]

>>49408372
Thoooooon habbening

[Anonymous No.49408417]

>>49408361
i actually have a node listed on there that has never been used because i just used it for testing and experimenting. how can i profit from this?

[Anonymous No.49408430]

>>49408372
no
this is the big announcement

[Anonymous No.49408459]

>>49408361
omg no boys we're dumping very hard

[Anonymous No.49408475]

Does anyone have a screenshot of what the old version 1 looks like?

What’s the difference

[Anonymous No.49408483]

>network generates 100M per year
its over

[Anonymous No.49408494]

>This is just the start. We’re already collecting and working on more data, which will drastically change the visibility into how Chainlink products are used and consumed. Did we mention that API access coming soon™ too?

[Anonymous No.49408521]

>>49408483
>LINK will be pulled from lending protocols and staked.
It's over for shorters

[Anonymous No.49408544]

>>49408483
>>49408521
God I can't fucking wait when lenders have to liquidate and swingers get fucked forever

[Anonymous No.49408543]

>>49408483
10% with hardly any use at all if every single token was staked. We're gonna be rich boys.

[Anonymous No.49408616]

The 30d tracker shows 1.75 million tokens. So 21 million tokens a year assuming this was an average month or $168,000,000 a year at the current price of ~$8. So even with the current usage (which just keeps going up) if all billion tokens were staked that's 16.8% per year. Fudders can go fuck themselves.

[Anonymous No.49408645]

>>49408616
In other words the price is at least 4x undervalued right now with even more room to grow.

[Anonymous No.49408646]

>>49408544
Checked

[Anonymous No.49408653]

>>49408616
When staking tho

[Anonymous No.49408661]

>>49408616
>16.8%
I'm going to be so erect holy fuck

[Anonymous No.49408675]

>>49408616
Uhhh, tranny bros?
How do we refute this?

[Anonymous No.49408676]

>>49408616
It's because of UST which caused massive volume spike. Not accurate

[Anonymous No.49408684]

>>49408616
Lolo, nice try. Its 0.168% moron. Check your math

[Anonymous No.49408685]

>post deleted
JANNIES ON SUICIDE WATCH HOLY FUCK

[Anonymous No.49408699]

>>49408475

[Anonymous No.49408787]

>>49408661
WHAT WAS IT AAAAA

[Anonymous No.49408799]

>>49408653
What did deleted post say

[Anonymous No.49408846]

>retard deleted his math
Guess he forgot to subtract the gas costs as well that eats up 50% of the revenue
If 90% of all tokens are stacked, were looking at 1 to 2% per year, no wonder Sir Gay has to pull out new usecases out of his ass every 6 months

[Anonymous No.49408866]

>>49408787
>>49408799
WTFWT

[Anonymous No.49408909]

Is there any way to look at historical rewards?
I wanna see what link rewards / gas was like during the bull market

[Anonymous No.49408921]

>>49408846
dead project???

[Anonymous No.49408969]

>>49408846
21,0000,0000 per year average from a current supply of around 460,000,000 is 4.6%, but not everyone will stake so if we figure 60% of people stake then in the middle of a BEAR market before ccip is even introduced link's staking revenue is currently around 7.6%. But you keep doing your discord math.

[Anonymous No.49408997]

>>49408361
wtf new UI?

Us marines are BLESSED.

[Anonymous No.49409048]

>>49408799
>>49408787
It was a guy who did some quick maffs and got fully diluted market cap with current usage APY of 17% which is about 3 orders of magnitude off. I'll let you guess in which direction.

[Anonymous No.49409073]

Fucken rugpull!

[Anonymous No.49409114]

>>49408361

Do these metrics include subsidies from the chainlink team? I’m assuming yes but I’ve only heard of a few feeds being profitable so far?wadmt

[Anonymous No.49409125]

>>49408653
>>49408661
>>49408675
>>49408676
>>49408684
>>49408799
The 30d tracker shows 1.75 million tokens. So 21 million tokens a year assuming this was an average month or $168,000,000 a year at the current price of ~$8. So even with the current usage (which just keeps going up) if all billion tokens were staked that's 16.8% per year. Fudders can go fuck themselves.

Uck Jannies

[Anonymous No.49409142]

ITT: retards who think rome was built in a day.

[Anonymous No.49409150]

>>49408969
>currently around
currently without the most lucrative part of the network running btw

[Anonymous No.49409169]

>>49408787
>>49408799
>>49408846
>>49408969
>>49409125
Retards. See >>49408676

[Anonymous No.49409199]

>>49409125
you need to remember gas is a cost as well. over the last 30d $8m was spent on gas.

profit margins are around 30% to run a node.

now CCIP will reduce the gas costs by 90% and increase revenue. as will arbitrarily validators and staking.

[Anonymous No.49409200]

>>49409150
Exactly. They'll still FUD though.

[Anonymous No.49409215]

>>49409125
those two days of LUNA and UST spike are likely outliers that shouldn't be used for future average projections

[Anonymous No.49409217]

>>49409125
You're assuming that nodes will stack your tokens for free and give you 100% of the reward, which obviously will not happen

[Anonymous No.49409218]

>>49409125
This is a bear market monthly average.
You also have to subtract gas cost

[Anonymous No.49409223]

Just rang Chainlink labs, the receptionist said no one there ordered a steak?
What do I do guys?

[Anonymous No.49409330]

>>49409200
>>49409150
Staking will not bring more revenue you fucking newfags, revenue comes from people calling link nodes. The absolute state of /biz/

[Anonymous No.49409335]

>>49409215
at current LINK prices, using a 1 week average, it would be about $50,576,032
that's not including CCIP, but who knows how long the bear market might last that would lower node demand
all it depends on is what % of LINK goes to staking.
current circulating LINK is: 467,009,549
what percentage can be expected to go into staking?
if it's a large percentage, likely that would drive up the price a good deal as well

[Anonymous No.49409343]

>>49409330
Might be talking about ccip

[Anonymous No.49409370]

>>49409330
staking will bring more revenue, people will have to start paying for price data, even if its only $0.10 currently they get it just for the gas costs and its free to them,

[Anonymous No.49409375]

>>49409343
True, but that is pure speculation at this point.

[Anonymous No.49409410]

>>49409370
People are already paying now retard, lurk more. Why post about something if you really have no idea how it works?

[Anonymous No.49409423]

>>49409335
if 25% of all LINK goes into staking, that ends up being about 5.5%
more than likely, more and more LINK will be staked, until it drops below a "too low" percentage
if it's 10%, more will join
that drives it to 8%, which likely more will join
when it hits, who knows, 4-6%, likely the people going into staking might decrease, so it remains steady around that 4-6% range
if 20-30% of all LINK gets pulled from exchanges then I wonder how much of a price change will be caused by reducing the float by that much

[Anonymous No.49409434]

>>49409330
>fudding staking
Absolute state of fudders

[Anonymous No.49409468]

>>49409434
I'm probably holding way more link and lpl than you. This is making me too angry I'm, out. Enjoy your thread retards.

[Anonymous No.49409479]

>>49409423
add node ops investors companies that will need to buy link on a constant basis to use the network. This is the singularity.

[Anonymous No.49409504]

Fat fat fat scam scam scam betray betray betray

[Anonymous No.49409556]

>>49409479
that'd into it, though I'm not sure how much pressure that would end up being or not
but also when staking comes out, more and more nodes will come out that will end up locking up a decent amount of the LINK supply
trying to estimate that in any sort of way is now pretty difficult
i'd say more than likely staking remains in the 4-6% range, and it would just be how much the price would likely rise over a year or so due to the demand increase of CCIP as well as amounts locked up due to staking

[Anonymous No.49409580]

>>49409125
>1.75M/month
As others have noted, this is not a good way to do it.
A closer approximation is 32k per day (activity is low, Ill grant you that), as such with the current usage we are looking at about 12M link per year in terms of rewards (we might get node incentives as well, but what do I know).
Gas costs over the last seven days, if you take the average price of link being 7, has eaten up 50% of the revenue. Im not counting any other costs that can come from running a node, that I assume are negligible compared to this.
If we assume, that 60% of the tokens will be stacked, you will get about 2% per year.
>what about CCIP
Will probably not see much use in the immediate

[Anonymous No.49409603]

>>49409330
where did I mention staking fucking pajeet

[Anonymous No.49409624]

is this some sort of a joke? this isnt even run by chainlink but some 3rd party linkpool crap

[Anonymous No.49409639]

>>49409580
even assuming 60% of LINK locked in staking is a pretty massive amount
if suddenly nearly 2/3 of the LINK supply is suddenly pulled off the market, what would that end up doing to the price?

[Anonymous No.49409697]

>>49408406
Thuper thoon

[Anonymous No.49409750]

>>49409215
outliers, but also not unprecedented: Anytime the market moves massively link tx's spike massively.
Safe to say the market moves 15+% in a day, you end up with that sort of volume

[Anonymous No.49409759]

>>49409750
we are the bank kek.

[Anonymous No.49409816]

>>49408361
Go staking with utk token

[Anonymous No.49409887]

>>49409370
Reverse Staking coming soon for UTK. T a great addition to the current token economics.

[Anonymous No.49409917]

>>49409370
You can see how much they're paying in the "Live updates" tab. I just calculated one of the AVAX price feeds and it looks like nodes earn $1.10 after you subtract gas

[Anonymous No.49409934]

>>49409125
LUNA and UST had two days of spike, this is not how averages are calculated. Look up outliers and then recalculate.

[Anonymous No.49409948]

>>49409639
You are assuming its on the market now. What makes you think there isn't sufficient Link in cold wallets right now.

[Anonymous No.49409978]

>utk
into my word filter it goes
>>49409948
who knows. also impossible to predict, tho likely the numbers in exchange wallets can be counted to see if they control a massive supply, or if it's just sitting around in who the fuck knows where

[Anonymous No.49409993]

>>49409125
>if all billion tokens were staked that's 16.8% per year
21 000 000 / 1 000 000 000 = 2.1% you illiterate (lying) shill

[Anonymous No.49410095]

wtf is moonriver? Those feeds are extremely profitable for node operators

[Anonymous No.49410118]

>>49409125
>1.75 million of 1 billion is 17%
biz - business and finance

[Anonymous No.49410139]

Go bury your ass in shame, when u can Switch to Web𝟑 p𝐚yments that aims to incentivize accepting and paying with crypto, capture value & transit to a DAO, which will be achieved through cashback, staking and premium features.

[Anonymous No.49410194]

>>49409993
would frot with this dude

[Anonymous No.49410245]

>>49409993
>>49410194
source?

[Anonymous No.49410292]

Nobody ITT knows what they are talking about, retards calling other retards retards

[Anonymous No.49410319]

>>49408361
you can gloat for now, but when cardano releases their marketplace overview.... you'll be sorry......

[Anonymous No.49410366]

>>49409603
Well what did you mean then?

[Anonymous No.49410417]

>>49410292
No, you are the retard retard

[Anonymous No.49410436]

>>49408361
might need to rethink the data visualisation there. i know, it's high tech stuff i won't pretend to understand but making all the colours nearly identical and displayed in effectively the same bar makes it a little difficult to read.... just gonna jizz some blue sky ideas out and feel free to shoot them down but.... how about a bar graph?

[Anonymous No.49410529]

>>49408361
>IT'S UP
it's over.

[Anonymous No.49410550]

>>49410436
it is pretty retarded
at least if you mouse of the bars or names it highlights what parts of the circle they are

[Anonymous No.49410581]

>>49410550
#MobilePajeetProblems

[Anonymous No.49410733]

Why is link the only crypto harshly judged on exactly how profitable it is, to the point that math autists have arguments with each other over dozens of posts over fine details, when literally everything else in crypto does virtually nothing? Even the leading current value capture in the space, eth (and by extension bnb) serve only 1 purpose, as gas to trade other worthless cryptos. There seems to be an assumption that speculators will never look at link, and it will only ever be valued based on exactly what it provides, while everything else in the space remains massively, massively inflated.

[Anonymous No.49410795]

>>49410733
Because we are mentally ill due to the price action sir.

[Anonymous No.49410831]

>>49410733
Because LINK is an actual project targeting the real world whereas everything else is casino. When betting all on red, do you calculate profit margins and growth potential? When buying pharmaceutical stock, do you rely on meme magic and numerology?
LINK is being treated like a boomer stock because it essentially is one. It's also the reason it didn't moon wildly btw, too many LINK investors are the kind of person who expects to see steady 5-15% a year and every price increase starting with x looks like a bubble sell signal to them.

[Anonymous No.49410890]

>>49410831
nice timestamp, and correct. it is the closest to fair value of any non stablecoin

[Anonymous No.49410893]

>>49410733
its the burden of link being one of the only worthwhile projects but on the backend, so they dont engage in retail marketing, have no vc backers, speculators dont care about it, so it has to thrive via adoption

[Anonymous No.49410897]

>>49408544
While wait u ass on that anon,Real estate industry is the next area where you should be focusing on. With low fees that UTK enables.

[Anonymous No.49411043]

>>49409169
thats not even half.
your volume spike doesn't even lower the estimate by an order of magnitude
how big your stack?

[Anonymous No.49411088]

>>49410436
pie charts are literally the worst

[Anonymous No.49411163]

>>49410733
Is there literally any other project in crypto that makes a profit that doesnt come from token inflation? Pretty astonishing stuff when you think about it

[Anonymous No.49411187]

How much lpl do you need to stake 1k tokens?

[Anonymous No.49411189]

>>49411163
convex crv and eth both have more earnings and more PE ratios retard

[Anonymous No.49411383]

>>49411189
I suggest you look into the tokenomics of convex a bit more bro, all of its earnings are paid for by token inflation. Ethereum also woudnt be profitable to mine without inflation. You are a nonce and a legitimate retard

[Anonymous No.49411484]

>>49411383
thanks man, I've actually been trying to figure that out all day. Also according to tokenterminal CVX is earning like 60mm per year which is much less than I saw here a while ago. https://twitter.com/tokenterminal/status/1532737988001767426?s=20&t=SucuthOmNl_EPPaJbC-16Q

But I think ETH actually is earning more in revenue per year than link by an order of 10 or so

[Anonymous No.49411526]

>>49411383
Excellent use of the word nonce.

[Anonymous No.49411535]

>>49411187
2.5k

[Anonymous No.49411634]

>>49411484
np, I learned this the hard way thinking quickswap was the best things since sliced bread because it made 100mm a year with a 100mm market cap until I eventually realised the token rewards to LP providers made it barely break even and once they dry up the project is dead

[Anonymous No.49411715]

avax may exceed $30 this week

[Anonymous No.49411738]

>>49411484
ETH is earning more than link due to shitcoin casino, it drops like crazy in bear markets. Link will too of course, but the difference is link is attempting to bridge the gap between a closed off ponzi and the real world. Ironically if link bridges that gap, eth will benefit in the short term but it'll be a race to zero in the long term with CCIP eliminating the moat for L1's.

[Anonymous No.49411743]

This is actually pretty fucking good if you ask me. You get 2% on a investment with endless growth potential and that potential will probably materialize so fucking fast.

[Anonymous No.49411752]

>>49411526
Not On Normal Courtyard Exercise. Its the most beautiful and versatile insult in the English language. If it were a shitcoin I would be going all in on it, its gonna explode over the next couple of years

[Anonymous No.49411960]

>>49410436
This. It looks like their new system was designed to display more range of color for charts with many quantities, but the actual data on most charts seems to skew to 1-3 quantities max thus everything is purple.

[Anonymous No.49412002]

bros should I just live off staking or sell next time we will be bullish? So tired of waging I need freedom.

[Anonymous No.49412077]

>>49411738
so can you help me understand how you should calculate eth earnings? 260m revenue past 30 days and you take into account inflation which is 3% yearly if you use past 30 day metrics.

[Anonymous No.49412152]

>>49412077
The point is eth's revenue has direct value capture because its spent as gas to transact on its network. However, this is reliant on transactions on the ethereum network. If people aren't transacting, which happens in a crypto bear market, those numbers will crater. And when the next cycle heats up, they'll explode again. This is why eth follows bitcoin and is reliant on it to make moves.

Link is literally the only project in crypto right now attempting to break that cycle, by onboarding enterprise so crypto can be used for real world usecases rather than trading ponzi tokens, it starts in November with swift and potentially even sooner than that depending what gets announced at the next 2 events. Its also why link has had an asynchronous cycle with respect to bitcoin, and will continue to in the future, and why link/eth is a shitty metric that never mattered in the first place.

[Anonymous No.49412252]

>>49411960
It's also interesting that there's only 30 days of data. We can't go back and see how profitable the network was back during the bull run -- post-LFG meltdown unambiguous bear market numbers only. Reminds me of the hiding strategy meme.
I'd encourage the subcontinent dwellers and turmeric monsters haunting this website to create a thread using publicly available data detailing the profitability of other crypto networks so that we can compare them to Chainlink objectively.

[Anonymous No.49412283]

>>49412152
Anon I have an idea. Wont staking increase revenue to the network, even if we assume all services offered stay the same? I believe that node operators rn are charging only what they need to pay their own team and cover their own costs. Wont they need to charge more in fees in order to be able to pay the people that stake on their node and attract collateral? I think chainlink nodes are currently too cheap.

[Anonymous No.49412289]

>>49412252
soon

[Anonymous No.49412290]

>>49412252
I brought this up earlier but everyone got distracted with trannies

[Anonymous No.49412525]

>>49412290

[Anonymous No.49412567]

>>49412283
It will increase revenue to the network but not in the way you're describing, rather, there are jobs right now that want to use the link network but can't due to issues with security. I don't think it has to be spelled out for most anons, but swift is literally waiting on staking to begin using the link network, and once that happens the floodgates open to other enterprise usecases.

[Anonymous No.49412610]

>>49412567
I hold link but I dont really buy that

[Anonymous No.49412656]

>>49408483
>secures many dozens of BILLIONS
>costs only 100 million

Is Chainlink unironically the most efficient financial system in the world?

[Anonymous No.49412724]

>>49412567
I wonder what the effect of low gas fees of the bear market will have for link profitability. Less transactions, but a higher profit margin?

[Anonymous No.49412807]

>>49412567
Is swift using in November

[Anonymous No.49412840]

>>49410733
Because linkfaggots are touting about being the god protocol and run fucking SWIFT.

[Anonymous No.49412874]

>>49412807
No swift are milking Sergey for information while they build their own interoperability solution. Im a link maxi but I wont be delusional about this particular thing

[Anonymous No.49412880]

>>49412152
Well written post and i completely understand it, i was looking for a way to have some comparable numbers even tho eth and link are very different.

[Anonymous No.49412932]

>>49412289
oh shit so much stuff i cant wait for.

[Anonymous No.49413024]

>>49412567
Should I go all in on chainLINK?

[Anonymous No.49413105]

>>49412002
Look up the story/parable of 'the golden goose' anon; then you tell us

[Anonymous No.49413168]

>>49412567
swift will be the last to officially adopt chainlink.

[Anonymous No.49413511]

>>49412880
Not sure on the exact numbers but my point was everything that has happened in crypto up until now is fake and gay, that is to say, its a bunch of whales throwing money around at nothing and playing musical chairs with each other. Think of it this way, if you own a casino, and once every 4 years you make insane profits, but for 2 years you go nearly bankrupt and only begin to break even again in the third year, does it make sense to bother calculating your yearly revenue as a valuable metric? If anything you'd want to look at something like eth or bnb in 4 year cycles, since they just follow bitcoin with a multiplier when bull and a negative multiplier when bear. Link still follows the 4 year cycle as well and is correlated to bitcoin, but its cycle isn't in sync, which suggests its doing something different. Last cycle it started pumping in sats in the summer, even though Bitcoin still saw a 50% capitulation in USD from that point that killed off most alts and took eth all the way down to $80. Conversely, link's bull ended in August 2020 (vs btc anyways), while most alts only started their runs around December 2020 as bitcoin was going parabolic.

Link is a leveraged bet that crypto is more than just a gambling casino ponzi. If you don't think it is, you shouldn't buy link.

>>49412874
Come on anon this is just the typical r9k poster imposter syndrome fear of success shit, same reason so many of you literally can't stop yourself from fudding day in and day out. Thinking big and having expectations isn't going to ruin link, and actually the opposite, if you prepare yourself for this, you'll be in a better state of mind. If you assume it can never happen, and then it does, you won't know what to do with yourself and will squander it.

[Anonymous No.49413947]

>>49413511
Should I just live off staking or sell next time we will be bullish? So tired of waging I need freedom.
As a maxi I am overexposed to this asset but fear that once we breach 3 digits I will be shocked again loosing another life changing sum.

Want to retire basically how would you approach it?

[Anonymous No.49413948]

>>49413511
Yeah im prepared for it and I hope it happens but im not gonna expect it. Reading the swift website all the stuff it says about this is almost like theyre trolling link marines with the constant use of the words "interlinking" and "interoperability" one thing I saw that gives me a bit of copium is they mentioned providing verified data

[Anonymous No.49414109]

>>49413511
Based effortposter rescuing dopamine levels. But I disagree.
Having expectation is pretty bad for wageslave linkies, waking up each day, first thought being "did it happen while I slept? Am I a free man?", then checking the chart and seeing a -30% (or even a - 0.3% day after day, month after month) is brutal and there's no way to sugar coat it. Link is a very harsh hold for someone who isn't already financially independent, you can only be happy with what's going on if you don't really need it to do anything soon. It's not always self sabotaging robots, it's drowning people flailing around helplessly.
And you said it yourself, a bet on LINK is a bet on crypto outgrowing its whale music chairs phase with all the pyramid schemes, dog coins, monkey jpegs and everything else smelling of summer. Bitcoin will survive and probably even prosper in a new great depression, but will ETH shitcoins? Will ADA? Is there any smartcontract L1 platform that would survive if people had to choose between heating and food? In 2 years yes, I'm betting my entire life savings on it. In one year very likely through integrations such as SWIFT (which may be in more danger than people realize, but that's for another conversation), but what about in 2 months?
What if in July Poland fucks around with Russia a bit too much and Putin rolls the dice on article 5? What if governments addicted to emergency powers initiate another lockdown for some stupid cough, crushing whatever weak recovery and ultimately initiating the great reset? The modern world is not stable because it's build on solid foundations, it's stable because all of the forces pulling it apart balance themselves out due to the magic of the free market and incentives. That is usually good as it's self correcting against minor disruptions, but makes it vulnerable to shit hitting the fan big time.
People are right to postpone picking the color of their yacht. Now is not the time for unconditional optimism.

[Anonymous No.49414240]

>>49414109
lmao there's no way this is not Chris Blec

[Anonymous No.49414299]

>>49409330
higher security will absolutely bring more customers

[Anonymous No.49414309]

>>49409199
>profit margins are around 30% to run a node
Wtf

Why am I not running a node?

Can I do a neet node with 5k link?

[Anonymous No.49414310]

>>49414109
Russian doesn't give a shit about west ukraine. Nothing is there except ukr nationalists and ethnic groups belonging to border countries. A lot of productive land and manufacturing is in the east.
CIPS uses the same SWIFT architecture.
Besides, if you aren't European, you'll get by just with higher prices. You think too much about things that you can't control. The media cycle is information overload right now and demoralizes you.
Buy storable food, water, and some jerrycans. Tell your family you love them and grind it out.

[Anonymous No.49414319]

I always sort all posts in link threads in order from bearish to bullish and agree with the median post

[Anonymous No.49414393]

>>49414109
>if people had to choose between heating and food?
Why does how much retail has in their pockets matter at all to you? Chainlink is a bridge between TradFi and DeFi, it is for investment banks, big accounting firms, IT services, governments etc etc. It is not the cattle to use in any societally disruptive manner, the actual functionality of Link will not benefit the cattle but rather their masters, this is why they try as hard as possible to demoralize us and try to make us hit the sell button. Btw, Swift will use Chainlink to fuck Russia so hard it will degenerate into a slavicpaste by the end of this. Do you have any idea what power these entities could derive from Chainlink, this is not a fucking silicon valley start-up, Link is like investing in the nuclear bomb. We are profiting from our own enslavement here.

[Anonymous No.49414413]

>>49414309
Have you not been paying attention at all anon

[Anonymous No.49414458]

>>49414309
After wages, high speed internet subscription, premium data subscription, amazon web service subscription, hardware costs and man hours it comes out to around costing $1000 a day for the privilege of running a node

[Anonymous No.49414560]

>>49414413
i haven't. used to watch every sergey speech several times and have read both whitepapers. now i can't even maintain the excitement to read the chainlink twitter

[Anonymous No.49414581]

>>49414560
Staking is coming in the next few months anon, maybe even at consensus here in five days. Then you’ll prob be able to NEET node

[Anonymous No.49414601]

>>49414109
>Bitcoin will survive and probably even prosper in a new great depression, but will ETH shitcoins? Will ADA? Is there any smartcontract L1 platform that would survive if people had to choose between heating and food? In 2 years yes, I'm betting my entire life savings on it. In one year very likely through integrations such as SWIFT (which may be in more danger than people realize, but that's for another conversation), but what about in 2 months?
Oh woa! Facinating argument! I'm sure you're letting all the anon in threads about other coins/tokens besides Chainlink know ALL about this conern.
Fuck off you disingenuous hack.

[Anonymous No.49414641]

>>49414560
The twitter row between clg and chris blec about the price feed multi sig was a good read. Very interesting topic, worth reaching and maintaining an erection for

[Anonymous No.49414768]

>>49414393
The truth can only set you free. As free as humans can be, at least.

[Anonymous No.49414784]

everyone should take 30 mins and watch jonny's latest talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ejrz0XvQc

also do people get why 3% isn't fud now? that's 3% in link
now imagine with price appreciation
and imagine as the market finally gets it and the speculative wave on top

[Anonymous No.49414905]

>>49414784
Except the current revenue is with no staking at all you moron.

[Anonymous No.49414942]

>>49414905
yeah but 3% is one of the fud lines

[Anonymous No.49415162]

>>49412077
it's all going in the pockets of mev mafia and metamask (lubin and jpm), eth holders arent seeing a dime so who cares

[Anonymous No.49415172]

>linkpools website
>they're showing off the interface with random numbers
>they used 77.7
>216
>5105

216 is clearly a nod to the old sergey boat picture as well as to ari's tetrakys book. not sure if 5105 refers to anything.

i will always remember that autistic girl at that fireside chat who asked ari about tetrakis and 216 and the look he gave her. he kept dismissing her then she said that number and his energy and expression changed and he stared at her for a second. they know we know. they know that we know that they know. we know that they know that we know that they know that we know that they know what we know and they know it too.........

[Anonymous No.49415430]

>>49413947
It's too early to call for me, but ideally living off staking returns would be the best outcome. If LINK truly becomes an income generating asset that people want to buy for passive wealth we'll be sitting pretty. If not, I would only sell some LINK to get into other income generating assets, but there isn't much these days that isn't boomer dividend stocks or real estate which carries its own set of risks, and is already super inflated.

A Chainlink that actually

[Anonymous No.49415447]

>>49412567
Swift is just a messaging protocol between banks. Why would they need to stake link to send messages? Maybe someone can explain this to me because I don't quit get it?

[Anonymous No.49415468]

>>49415172
based numbers. no idea about 5105.

fockin' jonneh your color scheme sucks. I had no idea most of the updates come from polygon GM sers

[Anonymous No.49415470]

>>49413947
It's too early to call for me, but ideally living off staking returns would be the best outcome. If LINK truly becomes an income generating asset that people want to buy for passive wealth we'll be sitting pretty. If not, I would only sell some LINK to get into other income generating assets, but there isn't much these days that isn't boomer dividend stocks or real estate which carries its own set of risks, and is already super inflated.

Retired off Link staking sounds so fucking /comfy/

[Anonymous No.49415489]

>>49415447
Swift won't be staking Link.
CCIP is just a message protocol like Swift, but Swift trust their selves to pass the messages without malicious intent.
For Swift to trust CCIP to send the messages that they want passed onto a Blockchain, they want those CCIP dons to have collateral.

[Anonymous No.49415546]

new distribution

[Assblaster No.49415553]

Made 82 link of this most recent distro, 100 in the last. Yum yum Johnny

[Anonymous No.49415582]

>>49415470
I’m going to build airships for pleasure and commerce.

[Anonymous No.49415643]

>>49415553
how much LPL needed for this?

[Anonymous No.49415653]

>>49415643
nearly 400k

[Anonymous No.49415723]

>>49415653
16 LP, from ICO?
and to think someone got 75 LP at ico (i think before bonus too)

[Anonymous No.49415818]

Soon
November
Next halving
Next 5-10 years

I cant take anymore. Why the FUCK did we have to miss the entire fucking bullrun. I couldve had a chance at a life, and they FUCKED US

[Anonymous No.49416018]

>>49415489
Thanks anon. So as I've thought, releasing CCIP is the bigger deal and not simply staking. But I understand you need staking to secure CCIP.

[Anonymous No.49416234]

>>49409330
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Trannies in full COPE mode tonight
God I love this place

[Anonymous No.49416251]

>>49415582
Based dirigible fan

[Anonymous No.49416297]

>>49410733
Because it's fun bro
And I'm having fun
Aren't you?

[Anonymous No.49416438]

>>49413511
Excellent wording, glad to be here for posts like these

[Anonymous No.49416466]

>>49416251
Think about how mega blimps for cargo transport would revolutionize point to point shipping. Sky truckers will be my magnum opus.

[Anonymous No.49416506]

>>49416466
I'm currently listening to 'Against the Day' by Pynchon. As an airship appreciator you should give it a go.

[Anonymous No.49416510]

>>49416018
No problem anon.
Yes staking is required. It seems as if Swift told the Chainlink team to build the message standard for communications between legacy systems and Blockchains.
It's going to be exciting when the system goes live and Swift members have access to Blockchains without any infrastructure changes.

[Anonymous No.49416570]

>>49416506
My favorite was the crying of lot 39. If you like that style of disjointed storytelling and want something a bit more pulpy try the Illuminatus! trilogy.

[Anonymous No.49416609]

>>49415172
Can you give us a bit more detail on this story and what the numbers mean? And what they know you know?

[Anonymous No.49416644]

>>49414784
> get 3%
> in an asset that has lost 90% of its value in a year
> lost 70% of its value in two years

[Anonymous No.49416672]

>>49416506
>>49416570
based post modern literature enjoyers. you will also like Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace but it is long and dense, an organism of entertainment. Try his shorter stories like Consider the Lobster. I also like Gravity's Rainbow by Pynchon and House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski unironically

[Anonymous No.49416719]

>>49408483
>network ALREADY generates $100m per year strictly from giving price updates and random numbers to an economy of babby's first meme dapps
ethereum's situation scares me but chainlink definitely isn't going away

[Anonymous No.49416827]

>>49408483
only 100m? in beta version without all the key features implemented? yeah im thinking link is toast the trannies were right

[Anonymous No.49416851]

>>49416609
sergey was once pictured in a boat on vacation, the boat was #216. this is from his couch surfing account i believe, which people on /biz/ found back in the day.


so this is where it gets weird. ari juels also wrote a fiction book that's a bit like the da vinci code for cryptographers (Tetraktys by ari juels, he had a talk at google about his book 10+ years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwpdC4HSDxg )


ari juels's twitter username is arij216. in his book the number 216 appears a lot. people on /biz/ took notice of this, once at a fire side chat like i said in my other post, a couple of years ago this one girl ran up to ari at a fireside chat/link meetup that they had that was being live streamed. she was asking him some questions, she was kind of ditzy and autistic, and she let it be known to him that she was shitposting on /biz/ while talking to him and asking him some of our questions. he was pretty much going to walk away from her and was politely trying to let her down, but she asked him "Ari can you tell us about 216?!" and he froze for a second and stared at her and paused a bit. i forgot what he told her. but i remember his reaction.

heres where it gets even more schizophrenic, 216 = 6*6*6. the chainlink logo is a Hexagon (6 sides). there is a storm on Saturn that has been going on for a long time. it's also curiously in the shape of a Hexagon on satellite photos. Saturn is the 6th planet in our solar system. we even have a day of the week named after Saturn, which is Saturday, formerly Sneed errmm i mean Saturnsday. there's a lot of triple 6's in hexagons and saturns is what im getting at.

there is way more math stuff about this and even a lot of gematria stuff about this if you research it further. but that stuffs above my paygrade, i don't pay too much attention to those things. but there are a lot of weird things about the link team linking back to that 216 number.

[Anonymous No.49416886]

>>49416851
This was his reaction to the question.

[Anonymous No.49416940]

>>49415172
>>49415468
>>49416609
uhhh boyos

[Anonymous No.49416956]

>>49416570
Actually just finished part 1 of illuminatus trilogy. Very funny but ultimately too waffly to really get into.
>>49416672
I've read pretty much all of dfw. Essays > IJ imo.

[Anonymous No.49416965]

>>49416940
what is gematria trying to tell us

[Anonymous No.49416974]

>>49416886
based, i love ari so much. is the footage from that stream still out there? haven't seen it in years.

>>49416940
ahhh there it is kek. well, long story short, the LPL team is quite clearly shitposting along with us and are using these numbers on purpose. 777, 216, and 5105.

[Anonymous No.49416989]

>>49416940
>Jonneh's partnership with 42 and The Schizo Corporation confirmed

[Anonymous No.49417019]

>>49416974
https://m.twitch.tv/toastertecc/clip/AliveKawaiiBeefRiPepperonis
Such a kino event. Last public appearance Sergey ever made. First time I've seen an annoyed Sergey

[Anonymous No.49417040]

based

[Anonymous No.49417059]

>>49417019
/comfy/

[Anonymous No.49417158]

>>49417059
Probably my favorite Link event. The SF Starfish is a very close second.
>They're making fun of me again, aren't they?

Honestly the biggest reason Link hasn't been as fun is exactly because Sergey, Rory, Adelyn, and Ari aren't doing in-person Link appearances anymore imo. They were so hype, and now all we get is a bunch of literal-whos talking about whatever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXt2gCa83Mo

[Anonymous No.49417253]

>>49416851
From the last time I went down the 216 rabbit hole
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mVWd1aLiYZQU8VvYFBnW8kxodeYim3bYDIFfh-w42eU/pub?urp=gmail_link&gxids=7628

[Anonymous No.49417260]

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1533964454127345666
>666
>ah hello? Eric Smitch is speaking at SMARTCON??
why doesnt anyone care?

[Anonymous No.49417272]

>>49417253
Got my hardcopy of this.

[Anonymous No.49417379]

>>49417019
those threads were legendary
i was more euphoric in that four-hour-long moment than i was at any point in the entire bullrun
thanks for the lulz, toastertecc

[Anonymous No.49417410]

>>49416851
Tl:Dr
Satan is a liberator and jews lied to you about metaphysics. Now you know.

But.... can you handle the truth etc etc All that cheesy shit too.

[Anonymous No.49417428]

>>49417158
>They're making fun of me again, aren't they?

i always reference this on /biz/ as well, felt bad for sergey but obviously it was in jest. he's in on the joke(s). one of the rare times he directly interacted with /biz/ in some way, at least publicly.

yeah and i share that feeling with you, i wish we could shitpost live with them at some point again at least in some capacity. who knows what the future holds. guys like sergey definitely are "one of us," and despite him keeping a low profile these days he is a pretty social guy. i think that even in the future even after he turbo makes it that he will still be a tiny bit accessible to the common folk at least in some way. we will see..

[Anonymous No.49417442]

>>49417260
yes of course they needed to tweet something bullish on 6/6/2+2+2

[Anonymous No.49417486]

>>49417428
Do you think this could have been him?

[Anonymous No.49417620]

>>49417486
well this person does write a bit like sergey and they do like books that sergey most likely also enjoyed. there's definitely an overlap of interests there. too hard to tell if that's him obviously as there's not much else to go on so overall it's a very low chance. but you never know.

[Anonymous No.49417663]

>>49417486
the more you push dox the less they post. kys

[Anonymous No.49417724]

>>49417158
Was that the Gonser event? Whatever happened to him, and York 'wen smile' Rhodes

[Anonymous No.49417851]

Alright schizos, what part of god protocol is chainlink?

[Anonymous No.49417927]

>>49417253
216 and 108 are numbers of the devil. Metatron is never mentioned once in both the OT and NT.

[Anonymous No.49417947]

>>49417410
The jews are the ones who worship Satan....

[Anonymous No.49418071]

>>49417253
You also need to know there is never a star of david mentioned in scripture. There is a star of remphan.

Are you aware that the devil (lucifer) disguises himself as an angel of light?

[Anonymous No.49418152]

>>49417253
While Gods creation is certainly apparent, there is a few contradictions in your information. For example. We know that all false religions are of the devil. Yet these same false religions use the number 108. Do you see what i am trying to say?

[Anonymous No.49418163]

>>49418071
Remphan is Saturn Satan Santa

[Anonymous No.49418198]

>>49417410
>Satan is a liberator and jews lied to you about metaphysics.
what was the lie?

[Anonymous No.49418274]

>>49418163
Yet that is not david. God rebukes those with the star of remphan.

Amos 5:26
Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition
26 But you carried a tabernacle for your Moloch, and the image of your idols, the star of your god, which you made to yourselves.

Acts 7:43
Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition
43 And you took unto you the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Rempham, figures which you made to adore them. And I will carry you away beyond Babylon.

[Anonymous No.49418331]

>>49417253
this is some major schizo shit. is this bearish or bullish for my bags?

[Anonymous No.49418451]

Here is a question for anons. What happens to the chainlink network if all the inputs are controlled by freemasons? What happens if all the nodes are controlled by freemasons?
>All congressman are freemasons
>All court judges are masons
>Owners of sport teams are masons
The list goes on but you get the picture.

[Anonymous No.49418474]

>>49408361
>put my last $200 into BTC and ETH
>haven't bought LINK since $20
Feels badman.

[Anonymous No.49418496]

>>49418274
(((David))) fought the giant, a nephilim

Moloch is the cannibal god they sacrificed to from all the way back in great babylon

[Anonymous No.49418504]

>>49418451
We profit massively?

[Anonymous No.49418589]

>>49418451
Anon will start a NEET node and offer concurrent services for being the only non freemason node and will make a lot of money selling definitive truth while slashing away the staking collateral of the freemasons delivering bad data.
This will eventually end with the Rothschild bankruptcy where the complete group will be forced to beg anon to give them a loan to repay the debt of lost linkies.

[Anonymous No.49418623]

>>49418589
I like the idea of using memetics to gaslight these fags into the bankruptcy just like "it's morbin time" kek

[Anonymous No.49418958]

>>49418496
David is not like a modern jew so i dont know why you put him on their level. Also the word nephilim means giants...

[Anonymous No.49419257]

>>49418451
Power structures always need vassals.
Are power structures good or evil or neither?

[Anonymous No.49419442]

>>49418451
hold overs from /pol/ got in on ICO. What ever the poweres that be do we profit. With that being said i cant wait to see what happens when pre trump era pollocks have a fuck load of money

[Anonymous No.49419552]

>>49417410
I agree with the Satan part, but Jews are the agents of Satan.

[Anonymous No.49419597]

160m annual revenues... ~300m eth revenue, 50% of eth revenue is from bot activity (and network prices would be relatively lower overall without bots).

Link revenue = eth organic eth revenue

eth worth 40x chainlink

few

[Anonymous No.49419632]

>>49418958
and do you know who the giants were? who did (((david))) fight and why is david named for the star of Rempham ?

[Anonymous No.49420249]

>>49409142
I can’t outlive Rome though

[Anonymous No.49420402]

>>49419257
If they are not of God they are evil.
>>49419442
>If we side with the devil and he profits we profit
Um anon. Does that not worry you?
>Is it good for a man to gain the whole world if he loses his soul?
>>49419632
All life was wiped out in the flood.go ahead and explain your point. I suspect i already know what you're going to say.

[Anonymous No.49420499]

link is neither good or bad it is neutral. We must hold in order to prevent evil entities controlling the network

[Anonymous No.49420516]

>>49419597
I know about bots on eth being a thing. But I thought crypto was supposed to stop that shit

[Anonymous No.49420558]

>>49408361
Hey faggots
Check the price
:')

[Anonymous No.49420632]

>>49415172
Chainlink balance:0, referring to chainlink is going to zero

[Anonymous No.49420634]

>>49420402
>All life was wiped out in a flood
factually incorrect life came from the water.

Basically we are all descended from the The Great Old Ones Cthulu especially from the time of the Mythos and you are just fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.49420678]

>>49420402
>water is wet
nigger do you know that there is life under the sea?

source: under the sea. song. the little mermaid. disney

[Anonymous No.49420690]

>>49420558
>fundamentally designed to DUMP TO ZERO

Link solves nothing, link does nothing.
The only profitable thing about link is to short it.

[Anonymous No.49420767]

>>49420678
nigga this shit is my jam yo
https://youtu.be/GC_mV1IpjWA
stay based and /schizo/ pilled

[Anonymous No.49420787]

>>49420402
There is no good or evil, only order and entropy.
What is the group aligning, what is the group throwing into chaos? What is your group aiming to align or throw into chaos?

[Anonymous No.49420817]

>>49420690
Haha yeah
The link token scam was an obvious top signal in crypto for those with eyes to see

[Anonymous No.49420860]

>>49420632
>Chainlink balance:0, referring to chainlink is going to zero

it refers to people not being able to afford a full link

[Anonymous No.49420895]

>>49419552
Based capcha

A look into gnosticism is required I believe. I don't know the answers (not claiming to) but curiosity got the better of me years ago and I tried the 'illuminati demons' later I came to the conclusion that it was all jews.

I was a wage cuck but not a normie. I realised I needed I was jn a wage cage. I asked Lucifer (felt kinda guilty like didn't want to think it was just about money) about what was a good investment, how to make mone

This was 2019 mind you. Anyway, about a week later discovered crypto (or rather I was made aware of it) and started browsing biz.

Had a chunk of saving and shares at the time so plenty to invest. No regrets asking our favourite fallen angel. They're fine if you can look at them unbiased and be respectful. Only need to meditate upon their sigils, chant their enn and things can begin to change.

[Anonymous No.49420957]

>>49420767
under the sea is the most esoteric track released by the (((disney jews))) and plebs dont even know

[Anonymous No.49420980]

>>49420767
>mushrooms and under the sea on repeat
big night ahead

[Anonymous No.49421030]

>>49420980
careful bro mixing under the sea and mushroom will fuck your mind up fr

[Anonymous No.49421054]

>>49418198
The bible and the kike God being the only one.

New Testament is correct at parts but im sure they've changed other shit to suit their purpose.

Jesus said things like love thy neighbour and love God with all your heart as commandments so that they couldn't be misinterpreted.

Trust me on this, forget the book.

Jesus is real and so is the Holy Spirit. Love God with all your heart and/or just do your best. Try and be a better person. Strive for truth.

They've boogeymanned Satan and evil and poisoned the well in regards to Goetic summoning. The Dark Gods are alright.

You'll discover there's a whole existence beyond some pedo sand nigger book edit. Look into Chakra Activities/ Energy work and unironically Yoga (not the stretching bullshit) there's so much more out there

[Anonymous No.49421068]

>>49417410
>Satan is a liberator and jews lied to you about metaphysic
Sounds like some redemption through sin jewish nonsense.

[Anonymous No.49421129]

>be me
>be all fucked up on mushrooms and mario kart
>under the sea comes on
>get dragged into the sweet abyss
>mfw

[Anonymous No.49421167]

>>49420634
>life came from the water.
Macro evolution is a complete joke.

[Anonymous No.49421174]

Two weeks ago I did mushrooms and listened to Under the Sea and let me tell you that facts do not even mattress. Anyone who has ever been so far as to get jacked up on the shrooms knows truth and peace but Under the Sea shatters every thing you thought you knew while nothing nothing on murshroomas

[Anonymous No.49421177]

>>49410897

I think this is going to work nicely. LINK is going to pump while ideally everything else collapses including real estate. I'd buy up so much foreclosed homes if we have another 08'

Honestly I'd probably try and let the people who had to foreclose stay in the home and then do a rent to own for 5 years ore more if needed because I believe in Christ and am not a kike. It could be risky though allowing those people to stay since they foreclosed to begin with.

I could make plenty of money in the 5 years from their rent plus utilizing it as collateral.

[Anonymous No.49421212]

>>49421129
word. god speed brother go with mario

though i walk in the shadow of death, with the italian plumber by my side there is nothing i fear

[Anonymous No.49421269]

>>49421174
under the sea is a hell few return from bro did you see the mermaid?

[Anonymous No.49421285]

>>49421269
not him but yeah anon I saw her. she was beautiful and scary and I had to check myself

[Anonymous No.49421330]

>>49420895
lucifer is an OC based off of Saturn

[Anonymous No.49421381]

>>49420767
do not click this link if you want to

[Anonymous No.49421489]

>>49417019
what ever happened to toestertecc? absolutely based

[Anonymous No.49421522]

>>49420767
Kek

[Anonymous No.49421533]

>>49421167
redpill me on this

[Anonymous No.49421544]

>>49420895
>Had a chunk of saving and shares at the time so plenty to invest. No regrets asking our favourite fallen angel. They're fine if you can look at them unbiased and be respectful. Only need to meditate upon their sigils, chant their enn and things can begin to change.

Find Christ, that won't end well

[Anonymous No.49421618]

LIFE IS SO GREAT UNDER THE SEEEEAAAAA

[Anonymous No.49421666]

>>49412289
Two more weeks

[Anonymous No.49421728]

>>49414319
Based and definitive truthpilled

[Anonymous No.49421732]

>>49421544
The spirit has done a very good job but one has to zoom out and see that it's not sustainable without some form of chains.
We can produce data endlessly but force it into dead ends some day, or we can force data to be chained by the laws of entropy and have it exist as perpetually as matter. I'm on the latter team.

[Anonymous No.49421829]

>>49421544
I found mario before christ found him

[Anonymous No.49421885]

>>49421829
basedo. walk with mario, fren

[Anonymous No.49421949]

>>49421533
Proteins cant be formed without instructions from dna. There are a ridiculous amount of basic amno acid combinations before you get a working protein. Usually at least 150 chain. You are more likely by trillions and trillions and trillions of times to randomly grab a specific atom in the observable universe then life is to form randomly. Also look at the dna structure. There is a chemical bond between the horizontal axis but not the vertical. How can dna know which acid comes next inorder to have functioning life? The very fact of information proves God exists.

Life cannot evolve in a marco condition because there are multiple components that all really on each other. If any one part doesnt function properly then the whole thing fails. Yet you're supposed to believe this early life survived hostile conditions?

Also you can tell a galaxy's age by counting supernova remnants. Counting our galaxy gives a rough age of approximately 6500ish years.

Carbon dating is very unreliable. Freshly dead mollusks are apparently over 3000 years ago. It's also circular reasoning because they date the substrate by fossils and fossils by substrate.

Most religions have a world wide flood theory. Consider they found sea shells on top of Mt Everest. Also if there was a flood then the substrate would be displaced and arranged by hydro something (sorry i forgot what it's called).

Here are some YouTube videos on this.
>https://youtu.be/PYSmV2FlHDw
>https://youtu.be/JiMqzN_YSXU

Also consider existence itself. Existence can only come from something that was already there. Aka an eternal uncreated God.

The big bang theory is pretty retarded when you consider that explosions never result in ORDER.

Notices it's "theory" or evolution and big bang "theory". Scientists used to think that cells were blobs of flesh and that exons were useless.

[Anonymous No.49421968]

>>49421949
>that all really on each other.
Rely*

[Anonymous No.49421970]

>>49421949
Under the sea
Under the sea
Darling it's better
Down where it's wetter
Take it from me
Up on the shore they work all day
Out in the sun they slave away
While we devotin'
Full time to floatin'
Under the sea

[Anonymous No.49422353]

>>49421949
tyvm. i will read and think

[Anonymous No.49422571]

>>49408372
two more weeks

[Anonymous No.49422658]

>>49410733
Why the fuck do you think so anon?

Spoilers: Because it's the only project worth a damn that they don't want newfags getting in on.

[Anonymous No.49422782]

>>49421949
God exists but you're an idiot

[Anonymous No.49422913]

>>49417260
Fucking hell.

[Anonymous No.49422992]

>>49416018
CCIP is friggin massive dude. It'll reinvent how developers manage their dapps. Currently, when you release a dapp, you deploy it on X blockchain's mainnet, then deploy it on Y blockchain mainnet (if you have Chainlink dependencies, you'll have to change addresses on your code), then you have to manage each dapp separately. If you're running a DEX, then you'll have liquidity pools split up between the difference blockchains. With CCIP, everything is merged together. No managing multiple version a la a developer managing their iOS and Android app. One main contract and you send commands to different blockchains.

On top of that, there will be dapps that are so big that they'll want to stop wasting their time having their users pay for gas, and MEV on top of the dapp fees, so they'll plan to move onto their own chain, a roll up and then interface with Ethereum via CCIP. Uniswap is predicted to become its own chain.

https://twitter.com/haydenzadams/status/1528580636029640705?s=20&t=-pS9hKcLwUt65psoTEojlw

Check this conversation of Uniswap with its founder.


In the DeFi industry alone, CCIP will shake things up massively in letting BTC users and other non smartcontract chains play the shitcoin casino. The enterprise abstraction layer will be onboarding companies who've been building their permissioned and private blockchains for ages. Who knows how much they account for and how far they've progressed.

[Anonymous No.49423263]

>>49421732
>he is afraid of his fate
You will live this moment again and you will be happy

[Anonymous No.49423341]

Under the sea
Under the sea
Darling it's better
Down where it's wetter
Take it from me
Up on the shore they work all day
Out in the sun they slave away
While we devotin'
Full time to floatin'
Under the sea

[Anonymous No.49423420]

>>49414310
>Russian doesn't give a shit about west ukraine.
Yes, but would react to provocations from there, potentially escalating shit up.
>Besides, if you aren't European, you'll get by just with higher prices.
Sadly, I am not only European, but eastern europoor specifically. I don't even follow the media, I get all of my news by reading between
the lines of propaganda pieces I see here.

>CIPS uses the same SWIFT architecture.
Interesting, didn't know that. All I know is that the 70% of the world that aren't the US and Europe are moving towards an alternative to the western dominated financial paradigm we have now, which if successful would shake things up quite a bit.
>>49414393
> Btw, Swift will use Chainlink to fuck Russia so hard it will degenerate into a slavicpaste by the end of this.
>We are profiting from our own enslavement here.
I don't see how? Chainlink is decentralized trust, Russia would be able to use it as easily as the rest of the world. Yes, I know the WEF has big plans for Chainlink, I just have no idea how they plan to pull it off. When you use chainlink oracles to power a smart contract, you explicitly specify the real world APIs to listen to for your data drip. ETH miners for instance can gather in a room and decide to fuck Russia with block order shenanigans, but Chainlink oracles are impartial by design. The one counting the jews you cremate when the holocauster leaves the gas chamber should be as reliable and impartial as the one counting the miles traveled in your tesla for insurance purposes. That's the whole point.

[Anonymous No.49423452]

>>49410733
Fudders love to hold Chainlink to a completely different standard than the rest of crypto.

[Anonymous No.49423571]

Under the sea
Under the sea
Darling it's better
Down where it's wetter
Take it from me
Up on the shore they work all day
Out in the sun they slave away
While we devotin'
Full time to floatin'
Under the sea

[Anonymous No.49424240]

>>49420787
this. this world is chaos and order fighting endlessly

[Anonymous No.49424263]

>>49412252
good post

[Anonymous No.49424285]

>>49412567
>>49412610
these newfags are in for such a surprise
https://youtu.be/NG5kcgCJLpc

[Anonymous No.49424333]

>>49421544
It's only gotten better bucko. (I'm Same anon but home now so no proxy IP)

Might as well add: I got a pay increase, promotion, more social connections, stable girlfriend and better life at home

[Anonymous No.49424359]

>>49417019
man, I was dying inside when she flat out asked ari about "2016"

[Anonymous No.49424360]

>>49421330
I dunno. Some say he's Venus, some Saturn, some the sun etc. He's done a lot for a lot of people and is unappreciated and has been hard done by kike propaganda

[Anonymous No.49424383]

>>49415172
found it https://www.twitch.tv/toastertecc/clip/SassyModernLapwingTheTarFu

[Anonymous No.49424454]

>>49420767
wtf I just got this song

[Anonymous No.49424478]

Is there really an expectation that a SWIFT announcement is going to kick off things immediately? Undoubtedly bullish as fuck but I can't believe there's many financial services firms that will be using blockchain in earnest anytime soon. I work in IT at a largeish AM and using blockchain has been mentioned as something that would be worth looking into, but nothing more than that.

[Anonymous No.49424491]

What’s so special about under the sea? I don’t see any double meaning in its lyrics.

[Anonymous No.49424498]

>>49410733
Here's another classic example of Chainlink being held to a completely different standard than the rest of crypto.

If literally ANY other crypto got a Swift announcement:
>instant x1000, no questions asked

If Chainlink gets a Swift announcement:
>I doubt many financial services will be using this in earnest any time soon

[Anonymous No.49424530]

>>49424491
I think you need to combine it with mario kart and shrooms but I am not schizo enough to enjoy

[Anonymous No.49424537]

>>49410733
Here's another classic example of Chainlink being held to a completely different standard than the rest of crypto: >>49424478

If literally ANY other crypto got a Swift announcement:
>instant x1000, no questions asked

If Chainlink gets a Swift announcement:
>I doubt many financial services will be using this in earnest any time soon

[Anonymous No.49424544]

>>49421949
based anon redpilling others
>Also you can tell a galaxy's age by counting supernova remnants. Counting our galaxy gives a rough age of approximately 6500ish years.
this argument I did not know yet
but if true it confirms we are near the end of kali yuga, because you can calculate it from the vedas and some astrological knowledge to be exactly 6500 years

[Anonymous No.49424575]

>>49424537
>undoubtedly bullish as fuck
nice.

[Anonymous No.49424578]

>>49424491
Under the sea = death

[Anonymous No.49424579]

>>49424575
>BUUUUT...

[Anonymous No.49424679]

>>49421949
That doesn't prove a lot unfortunately when you know of the spiritual world and the soul's ability to change the physical unobserved world through quantum manipulation.
Even if life through randomness is impossible it doesn't matter.
All that is needed to create it is no one observing it creation by a spiritual being to make it possible.
Only after someone observes a truth does it become difficult to change because the spiritual world for some reason does not want to be recognized in the physical world.

[Anonymous No.49424725]

>>49424579
your new life starts years after the swift announcement when link gets enterprise adoption, it doesn't start when swift gets announced. that's all i'm saying, but you know this.

[Anonymous No.49424734]

>>49424725
>guys think about it, how bullish is a Swift announcement really?
>let's deconstruct...

[Anonymous No.49424781]

>>49421949
from what I can find there are SNRs with a radius that implies at least 40000 years old anon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeis_147

show where you get the number 6500 from or I will assume it's nonsense.

[Anonymous No.49424783]

>>49424734
>link is about enterprise adoption and neet nodes
>noooooooo it's about ANNOUNCEMENTS of those things

[Anonymous No.49424795]

>>49424783
Announcements is how we would find out about enterprise adoption.

[Anonymous No.49425373]

>>49409330
Sergey mentioned a second revenue stream in his staking presentations. Like this "securing DONs" services will be paid in the same way that people pay for VRF, Keepers, data requests... etc

[Anonymous No.49426012]

>>49410733
Shhh, you’ve figured it out. Stop telling them and invest wisely :)
Verification not required

[Anonymous No.49426075]

>>49416940
Correct

[Anonymous No.49426302]

>>49424383
omg lol the suffering on his face

[Anonymous No.49427401]

Lotsa big swinging IQ posters in this ITT
Even if this place goes down to constant shilling or legal closure, it has bred very worthwhile individuals who have developed or are going to develop generational wealth
I hope they are networking and for better causes than /pol/'s astroturfed 4th Reich

[Anonymous No.49427961]

ive never seen so many coincidences on a single asset

[Anonymous No.49428569]

>>49427961
fucking lol saved