Trips for LINK being a scam

[Anonymous No.4933921]

If this happens, I'm selling it all.

[Anonymous No.4933924]

>>4933921
op btfo yet again rofl

[Anonymous No.4933932]

>>4933921
doubles and link is 100 by 2018 EOY

[Anonymous No.4933934]

>>4933921
Link 5$ by 2018.

[Anonymous No.4933940]

link is risky

[Anonymous No.4933954]

>>4933932
Feels bad man.

[Anonymous No.4933955]

Trips for link being $14 this time next year

[Anonymous No.4933959]

Trips and it becomes a top 10 coin in 2018

[Anonymous No.4933965]

>>4933955
Re rollin

[Anonymous No.4933978]

See you at 1 cent, normie.

[Anonymous No.4933979]

>>4933955
>>4933959
Rollin for both of these

[Anonymous No.4933989]

Dubs, and LINK is $1 by christmas

[Anonymous No.4933994]

1 cent

[Anonymous No.4934003]

>>4933979
>>4933959
>>4933955
One more time come on

[Anonymous No.4934008]

LINK $100 EOY 2018

[Anonymous No.4934024]

trips LINK is a good idea that is poorly executed by a beta faggot that will never deliver

[Anonymous No.4934050]

2$ EOY

[Anonymous No.4934052]

20 dorra next year

[Anonymous No.4934062]

Dubs, and Link surpasses Arki's market cap by new years

[Anonymous No.4934067]

these dubs confirm linkies will be JUSTed come 2018

[Anonymous No.4934076]

>>4933921
The price shall be high, because everyone will want to buy

[Anonymous No.4934087]

>>4934024
>beta faggot
>vitalik

thanks anon, all in on link.

[Anonymous No.4934113]

>>4933921

The ChainLink network will be worth tens of billions by 2020.

[Anonymous No.4934120]

$10, eoy 2017

[Anonymous No.4934137]

dubs, and sergey loses half his weight by valentine's day

[Anonymous No.4934151]

>>4933921
Trips and retarded numerology has nothing to do with real life

[Anonymous No.4934152]

>>4933921
Link surpasses ripple in mc by 2019

[Anonymous No.4934167]

>>4934137
Well.. Shit.

[Anonymous No.4934380]

I bought at $0.30. I'm a bag holder now but that's cool. I was a bag hold for Einsteinium but that turned $200 into $6000.
I'm counting Link as a loss and hope that one day I'll find out its in the $10 range.

[Anonymous No.4934391]

what's a bitcoin

[Anonymous No.4934395]

Look at their github, it's a joke.

Written in ruby and hardly worked on

[Anonymous No.4934436]

Link will hit $4.44 on 04/04/2018 at 4:44pm.

[Anonymous No.4934452]

>>4934436

Check'em

[Anonymous No.4935603]

>>4934380

preach. long term hodl time. 2 years and we will be filthy from it

[Anonymous No.4935664]

I've been buying in on the sweet dips for a week now h-hehe.

[Anonymous No.4935716]

Useless fags can’t even dubs. LINK will be $100 by July.

[Anonymous No.4935726]

$2 by february

[Anonymous No.4935749]

1$ in 1 month

[Anonymous No.4935753]

Trips for LINK being 2000 satoshis ($150) eoy 2019

[Anonymous No.4935759]

$1k eoy 2018

[Anonymous No.4936020]

Link is a dog

Pajeets turds are worth more each

[Anonymous No.4936082]

>>4935603
We will be filthy rich in 6 months. In two years you dont even know what to do with all the money.

[Anonymous No.4936101]

>>4936082
So this 2-man team's going to do it?
Normally you see 8 or so teams.

[Anonymous No.4936126]

Link is not a scam

[Anonymous No.4936147]

Dubs and scam exposed soon

[Anonymous No.4936150]

>>4936101
what about google
and microsoft
and apple
and facebook

[Anonymous No.4936166]

>>4936101

Yup. Two person teams never did shit.

[Anonymous No.4936283]

>>4933921
>If this happens, I'm selling it all.
>If this happens, I'm selling it all.
it won't

[Anonymous No.4936359]

>>4933921

scam

[Anonymous No.4936364]

Link will have a trillion $ marketcap

[Anonymous No.4936366]

>>4933921
>bitcoin goes up a bit
>LINK sat value instantly in the gutter
>stabilizes
>bitcoin bleeds out
>LINK sat value doesn't go up

tied to fiat value when bitcoin moons, tied to sats value when bitcoin dumps....very nice.

[Anonymous No.4936386]

your obviously looking for an excuse to sell off your LINK

do it now

[Anonymous No.4936619]

>>4933921
scam confirmed

[Anonymous No.4936653]

>>4936150
>>4936166
Okay, I've heard rumours of them not even working in the same space. That's incorrect?

[Anonymous No.4936759]

Link -$20 2017 EOY
All linkies collectively suicide

[Anonymous No.4937006]

Link will moon hard in February 2018

[Anonymous No.4937126]

>>4936759
CANT WAIT

[Anonymous No.4937312]

Jesus christ I hate all of you stupid fucks so much.
First off, you all always put fucking money in shit that you have no idea how the fuck to evaluate even slightly, and secondly you are all too chickenshit to just fucking email the guy or get on chat with him and ask him pointed questions dumb fucks.

Here is my evaluation.
1. The codebase is a sprawling and barely documented mess written entirely by one fucking dude with no outside help.
2. The codebase structure is horrific and displays massive levels of general incompetence and that the only developer has no experience engineering a project meant to scale properly.
3. There is no evidence of him hiring anyone as far as I can see. There is no code that has been publically commited in the last month. I'd be worried he'd ran off with the money if I were you guys desu.

4. When I talked to him he seemed to realize 1 and 2 were the case, and is planning on rewritting the entire platform from scratch in golang instead of ruby. When asked about his experience or qualifications in this area he admitted that he didn't know golang but was working on learning it as quickly as possible so he could START, keyword START rewritting the new platform.

[Anonymous No.4937360]

There's a new "chain" in town and it already BTFO REQ&LINK (req catching up though)

[Anonymous No.4937364]

100$ Some day

[Anonymous No.4937381]

>>4937312

cont.

5. Some of the latest commits on his github have been related to some CryptoKitties contest, NOT the fucking new platform.
6. The api documentation is very shoddy and thrown together, once again with no outside help at all.
7. My overall impression? Dude is just some regular autist dude that is in way over his head and doesn't understand the fact that he now has fudiciary responsibilites to shareholders. He thinks because of the fact that he put a disclaimer on LINK means he can do whatever he wants.
8. He is literally treating this like a side project while treating himself to bullshit with the money everyone gave him in the ICO, autistically acting like he can just blow off the project.

9. this projects whitepaper is completely open and anyone looking at his paper and the lack of action being done here could steal his idea and probably with a team of 2-4 people implement it 10x better and faster in the time it will take our jerkoff dev to get off his ass.

[Anonymous No.4937443]

>>4937381

10. The design/idea is simple enough that 9 is very very doable. and with the API documentation this dude already has up, said team could steal the idea and have their counterfeit version be totally compatible with the same api calls that the real one would use.

FFS, you guys are fucking BAD at research. I fucking wish you guys would get your acts together instead of shitting in each others mouths while yelling HOdL and screeching. Grow the fuck up, this is your money you are throwing in the trash.

[Anonymous No.4937459]

>>4937443

they always fud the hardest when you are over the target.

hodl! you sound like a salty competitor. keep crying them liberal tears when your knockoff shitcoin gets owned

[Anonymous No.4937481]

>>4937381
Its funny how people think more people = better programs.

[Anonymous No.4937484]

LINK $10 eoy.

Also check em

[Anonymous No.4937508]

>>4937312
>>4937381
>>4937443
Buy LINK faggot.

[Anonymous No.4937520]

if dubs sergey is a lizard person

[Anonymous No.4937527]

>>4937459
I'm just providing commentary, enjoy your shitcoin.

>>4937481
I don't think more people = better programs, mythical man month, yadda yadda yadda, but the whole point of hiring a dev was because he doesn't know anything about golang and wanted to get a domain expert onboard to stop him from fucking it all up. Also, it is silly to think that this dude can write the entire platform by himself, that is how you end up with shit like the mess that is the current ruby platform.

[Anonymous No.4937559]

>>4937527
how many people got bitcoin off the ground in the very beginning?

just because you are incapable in life doesnt mean others cant do huge things on their own

[Anonymous No.4937567]

trips and SerGAY fucking dies and LINK is cancelled

[Anonymous No.4937569]

>>4937527
Isn't he working with another guy, plus he has Steve and a whole team of advisors? Also hasn't he been working on this since 2009?

[Anonymous No.4937620]

>>4937443
>>4937381
>>4937312

Why don't you post the conversation. Otherwise you're just larping m8.

[Anonymous No.4937683]

>>4937569

Yes the director of engineering at facebook evan cheng who also was apparantly the main guy doing machine code at apple for years is an advisor. I know he's not looking at this day to day but for some reason I doubt he'd get involved in something that was as obviously fucked as this larper is describing.

[Anonymous No.4937695]

Quads and we are going to make it bruhs

[Anonymous No.4937708]

>>4937559

Dont even try to compare the original BTC codebase to this shit, stop what you are doing right now and go check it out right now. There is a major difference between a master craftsman working for years in seclusion and some dude hacking together crap in ruby. Even with that BTC probably would have had less initial bugs if it hadn't been written solely by one person. Nakamoto had been working on the damn thing since the 90s.

>>4937569
Ask him yourself. That is not what he said to me.

[Anonymous No.4937717]

>>4936366
Wow you just described every alt coin

[Anonymous No.4937718]

>>4937683
the larper reeks of someone trying to push his own shitcoin

hope it crashes and burns buddy

[Anonymous No.4937757]

>>4937683

>as this larper is describing.

LITERALLY LOOK AT THE GITHUB. How fucking retarded are you all to invest in software startups without being able to evaluate the quality of a codebase. It is horrible upon even the most cursory glance. It is clear none of you have even looked at the fuckin thing once.

If you want to actually come back against what I'm saying. Use the dudes code to show an example that is well written.
>protip: YOU CANT

[Anonymous No.4937765]

>>4937718

Some of these are my own entirely baseless FUD talking points that he appears to have copied. Some other faggot is shilling feathercoin in another link thread so you're probably right.

[Anonymous No.4937768]

>>4937718
Well I hope you never buy a single LINK token.

[Anonymous No.4937783]

>>4937757
Show me the conversation logs please. It's all I require to believe you.

[Anonymous No.4937828]

>>4937768
ive got enough to laugh my way to the bank while you sit there screeching autistically

[Anonymous No.4937906]

>>4937828
Doesn't even make sense, so you're saying you do own link then?

[Anonymous No.4937921]

>>4937757
LARPING faggot, post screencaps of convo you faggot fuck

[Anonymous No.4937935]

>>4937828
I figured out who you are
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR-R4xs-BWOBx7kLCAQVHzA
You're so desperate.

[Anonymous No.4938033]

>>4937935
this faggot again. Such a punchable voice.
My fist would come out through the back of his head holding his nose, teeth and all that shit on the other side

[Anonymous No.4938110]

https://gitter.im/smartcontractkit-chainlink/Lobby

Isn't this FUD guy from gutter? Ethan Willis?

[Anonymous No.4938156]

Stinky linkies
https://discord.gg/K9AnjqS
Link is not the one to buy

[Anonymous No.4938405]

>>4937757
hey asshole fuck where did you go you pussy motehr fucker? Post caps of the convo and show proof u faggot

[Anonymous No.4938720]

>>4934395
You're an idiot if you think that's all they got. You know there is competition for this kinda thing? People could steal your code if you put it all out there prematurely.

[Anonymous No.4938845]

>>4937312
>>4937381
>>4937443
Sounds like you really shouldn't invest in Link, anon.
See ya!