LINK future millionaire club

[Anonymous No.3601553]

Who here ready to get filthy rich from LINK? SWIFT performs 26.52 million network transactions PER DAY. And they are still growing.
source
> https://www.swift.com/about-us/swift-fin-traffic-figures

With their partnership with ChainLink aka SmartContract confirmed and with SWIFT and 32 banks including Wells Fargo testing blockchain tech, ChainLink is going to be make you ungodly wealthy if you are hodling a decent amount.

Congratulations to you if you were smart enough to invest in LINK

[Anonymous No.3601564]

>>3601553
>mfw in 10 years people will refer to me as 'that man that invested in chainlink'

[Anonymous No.3601569]

indeed OP. unimaginable wealth will be ours withink a month

[Anonymous No.3601573]

>>3601553
/comfy/

[Anonymous No.3601575]

It literally says on chainlink website they literally designed SWIFT smart oracles. The node operators that verify transactions are paid
...in motherfucking LINK!!

[Anonymous No.3601595]

>>3601575
I know, feels good getting in on the ground floor with future tech. I don't even care about the memes and the FUD, mouth breathers on 4chan cannot stop this tech and this company from advancing, and they are certainly not bigger than the execs who will be present at sibos.

so fucking stoked

[Anonymous No.3601598]

Looks like whoever is doing that FUD campaign finished accumulating, and now theyre switching to FOMO campaign.

Thank god, those were getting so annoying.

[Anonymous No.3601605]

exchanges fucking when??? I'm getting impenitent

[Anonymous No.3601609]

>>3601598
NOOOO
SELL THIS SHITCOIN

[Anonymous No.3601610]

Whats a good price estimate for end of october?

in eth

[Anonymous No.3601612]

Need to accumulate but not buying off ed

[Anonymous No.3601613]

>>3601553
PLEASE BE TRUE, I only have 13k Link but I want to make it so bad ffs

[Anonymous No.3601615]

>>3601610
Why do you guys always speak in sat and eth or whatever instead of just dollars. Why make it so hard?

[Anonymous No.3601616]

Realistically, how much are you guys expecting this to pump? I only put 2 ETH in, but I plan on selling stuff on craigslist and ebay to buy some more

[Anonymous No.3601621]

>>3601613
>mfw 98k LINK

[Anonymous No.3601626]

>>3601615
Because the goal of cyrpto is accumulate more btc and in some cases eth.

[Anonymous No.3601627]

>>3601615
ohh normie spotted

[Anonymous No.3601628]

>>3601615
Why are you clinging so tightly to your dying fiat?

[Anonymous No.3601633]

>>3601610
1 Link = 0.004 ETH

[Anonymous No.3601635]

>>3601628
Because it gives me a better idea of what I can buy with the profit.

[Anonymous No.3601638]

>>3601615
Because realistically, SAT and ETH matter more than dollars. If you coin goes down down in sat, but bitcoin skyrockets, technically you went up in dollars. But it's misleading, since bitcoin would be ready to crash.

Always focus on accumulating sats.

[Anonymous No.3601640]

>>3601615
Sats>Fiat kiddo. If you gain fiat by losing sats you are doing it wrong

[Anonymous No.3601651]

l will buy link when l see first pink wojaks thhreads

[Anonymous No.3601665]

If you faggots haven't done so, send in the coin request form on polo for link so we can get this shit the fuck out of Pajeetdelta.

https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

[Anonymous No.3601674]

>>3601564
KEK, HERE YOU GO SENPAI:

YOU ARE THE MAN WHO INVESTED IN CHAIN LINK

[Anonymous No.3601679]

>>3601651
You don't even have to invest in link. Become a node operator and get paid in LINK and trade that shit for BTC or ETH

[Anonymous No.3601688]

>>3601679
How do you become a node operator?

[Anonymous No.3601699]

>>3601688
I think you need a million trillion quintillion links

[Anonymous No.3601712]

>>3601665
fuck that is a dank meme
saved

[Anonymous No.3601743]

>>3601699
WRONG
you need exactly 0 LINK to run a node
However, the more LINK you posses the more likely it will be that someone uses your node, the more trusted your node is.
If someone uses your node, you will be paid in LINK

[Anonymous No.3601960]

https://www.swift.com/about-us/swift-fin-traffic-figures

Look at the fin traffic, right after the conference it starts mooning up.

[Anonymous No.3601999]

>>3601613
3 companies won SWIFTs Sibos Innotribe startup award to implement emerging securities technology.

Only one of these companies is showcasing the tech and project they won their contract for. One of the companies that won considered what Sergey is doing a pie in the sky dream for Blockchain.

The demonstration at Sibos will show the phase 1 implementation of SmartContrat's middleware on SWIFT compliant data and messages. We are waiting for what phase 2 is. If phase 2 goal is mainstream adoption by SWIFT participants, there will be no upper bound.

It is true, it is just how much is the truth worth.

[Anonymous No.3602030]

I got 15K, am I gonna make it lads? It's all I could afford :)

[Anonymous No.3602052]

>>3602030
yes, each LINK will be worth 10 BTC very soon. enjoy being richer than bill gates.

[Anonymous No.3602062]

Hey there, LINKies. I was FUDder in chief these last few days. Was able to accumulate about 200k LINK during that time and have officially switched sides.

Shaking those week hands was just too easy.SIBOS here we come

[Anonymous No.3602085]

>>3601553
what is a decent amount?

i have 6500? don't want to be rich rich yet but if i can make this about 100K then i'm started and i can invest in everything i trust in without worrys so that would be a juge upper for me

is that possible?

[Anonymous No.3602156]

>>3602062
thank you, based fudder

[Anonymous No.3602185]

>>3602085
Turning 6500 LINK to 100000 USD?

Anon, it would require almost 5.5 billion USD market cap if we stay at the token numbers at 350 million.

Do I believe? Sure why not. None of us would be putting money into BTC/ETH or what ever if we didn't believe, but we know your weak bitch ass hands will sell way before that anyway.

[Anonymous No.3602316]

>>3602052

Thanks Fellow Link Marine!

[Anonymous No.3602345]

We made it

[Anonymous No.3602354]

Assuming circulating supply is kept as 350m on cryptocap, 5.5b MC shouldnt be difficult after SWIFT adoption. ripple is not even being used and it's 6.7b.

[Anonymous No.3602356]

>>3602345
did someone fatfinger the price on ED, or did the price go up?

[Anonymous No.3602361]

>>3601564
>See that guy? He bought LINK when it was 10 fucking cents.
>Damn. Anyway, gotta go sign off on my Smart Oracle for my new car.

[Anonymous No.3602368]

SWIFT is treating this as a curiosity and the way it attracts speculators like flies to shit is a detriment in their eyes.

[quasimodo No.3602376]

>>3602356
Fat finger. Bought 900 for 4 ETH. Then some other cuck bought 5 for the same price LUL

[Anonymous No.3602386]

>coordinated fuding to the extreme
>people who weren't in the ico getting caught up in the middle
>see all the drama and confusion
>want nothing to do with it
>there are always more opportunities
>in a week ico holders end up dumping on each other instead because no new money want's to enter the market

tfw you fud so hard you cut the life of your coin short

[Anonymous No.3602394]

>>3602368
Curiosity would be giving them the award in 2016.

Curiosity is when Ripple tries to square up and SWIFT wondering what is going on.

There is the chance this is the nuclear option SWIFT is doing to crush Ripple.

It isn't curiosity anymore. The world knows what blockchain technology represents.

[Anonymous No.3602395]

How come it is below ico price then?

[Anonymous No.3602399]

>>3601999
Actually, Smartcontract/Chainlink won the "Industry Challenge", they beat out the other competitors and SWIFT is now their paying customer.

Also, Ripple has beef with SWIFT, so SWIFT is going to be shilling the fuck out of Chainlink to destroy Ripple.

[Anonymous No.3602403]

Anyone got a link/source on the swift thing?, thats not just a rumour from Sergei, something from swift themselves?

[Anonymous No.3602415]

>>3602403
>>3602403
>>3602403
This.

Proof or you're a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.3602427]

>>3602395
It was below ICO price even during the ICO.

[Anonymous No.3602430]

>>3602399
Actually if you check my fucking trips I am not fucking wrong

They had two other competitors that won the challenge with them

They are the only ones bringing their product to guide SWIFT to the new tech frontier

http://www.bankingtech.com/595652/sibos-2016-innotribe-industry-challenge-results/

[Anonymous No.3602446]

>>3602403
>>3602415
https://www.sibos.com/conference/conference-programme/bridging-dlt-and-swift-messaging-smartcontractcom-innotribe-industry

Here. Remember that the S in SIBOS stands for SWIFT, they organize the conference.
So this is straight from the horse's mouth.

[Anonymous No.3602451]

>>3602415
>>3602427
You two are such dumb niggers it is astounding

https://www.sibos.com/conference/conference-programme/bridging-dlt-and-swift-messaging-smartcontractcom-innotribe-industry

https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial/

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/the-race-to-connect-smart-contracts-to-the-real-world

https://www.gartner.com/doc/3698947/cool-vendors-blockchain-applications-

http://www.the-blockchain.com/2017/08/22/smartcontract-com-used-swift-announces-technical-leaders-advisors-launches-chainlink-connect-smart-contracts-off-chain-data-payments/

https://venturebeat.com/2017/09/20/chainlink-raises-32-million-to-connect-blockchains-with-external-data/

[Anonymous No.3602461]

Did it seriously just go up 909% or is etherdelta and blockfolio being a piece of shit

[Anonymous No.3602464]

>>3602430
>September 2016
yeah, Smartcontract/Chainlink won that contest.

See the link in >>3602446
It literally states that Smartcontract/Chainlink is the Industry Challenge winner.

[Anonymous No.3602472]

>>3602451
>what is jokes

[Anonymous No.3602491]

>>3602464
Are you fucking retarded

>Three start-ups won the challenge to introduce blockchain to the securities sector: SmartContract, Rise and Coin Sciences.

Only Sergey and SmartContract has a proof of concept good enough to be actually implemented

Even their competing challenge winners stated that what Sergey is trying to do is unlikely until now

[Anonymous No.3602504]

>>3602451
>won an award
>one of several companies Swift is interested in
Why the fuck do you go on the internet and shill

[Anonymous No.3602506]

>>3602446
fair enough, might buy a little then

[Anonymous No.3602518]

Feels good

[Anonymous No.3602519]

>>3602491
Are YOU fucking retarded?

Where does it say that contest winners are going to be fully integrated into Swift and have a full fledged partnership?

Just because your shitcoin is slightly better than other shitcoins doesn't mean you're going to the moon with the help of major institutions

[Anonymous No.3602534]

>>3602504
I don't know because if you fucking retards actually had any talent besides holding bags, you would realize that among the winners of their challenge and among the players that SWIFT is interested in, ChainLink/SmartContract is the furthest along and is doing the only demo/presentation at their conference that deals with what they are working with which essentially gives them the first mover advantage and a fucking mile long head start among their competitors within SWIFT and anyone looking to get adopted?

[Anonymous No.3602559]

>>3602519
>As DLTs mature, it is becoming increasingly clear that no single platform will replace a significant end-to-end financial business process in one step. Rather it seems increasingly likely that DLT will work with other automation technologies, including messaging and APIs. In this session we hear how the 2016 Innotribe Industry Challenge winner proposes to bridge DLT platforms with ISO 20022-compliant SWIFT messaging. SmartContract.com will present a live demo of a Proof of Concept where a DLT platform manages ISO 20022-compliant bond instruments, while an ISO 20022-aware Smart Oracle settles coupon payments off-ledger through ISO 20022 payment messages over SWIFT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjcjPaVADa8

It is almost like everything is coming to a boiling point

Hmmm

[Anonymous No.3602575]

>>3602534
See
>>3602519

Literally all just speculation. And it's even worse than most speculation in altcoins. This is another layer of speculation.

You're putting so much emphasis behind the Swift partnership that literally has no evidence beyond being involved in some competition that went well.

So what? Who cares if Link does 80% of what Swift is looking for well. If they aren't perfect for Swift they'll just find something to do themselves.

Altcoins are speculative enough I'm not going to waste money on things that might only be valuable if they get the backing of a major interbank institution when they're only a fucking startup and had a nice science project once.

This market is full of idiots

[Anonymous No.3602598]

>>3602575
So you just invest in shitcoins that have no actual value besides what they can promise you in chicken nugget sized white paper and road maps with interactive graphics

Stay poor anon

[Anonymous No.3602619]

>>3602598
how about investing in the conglomerated Money Skeleton projects?

[Anonymous No.3602629]

>>3602575
>Literally all just speculation.
lol

The tech has the potential to change the way the business and financial world do and record transactions, and has backing from SWIFT.

So a working product with tremendous use cases and backing from THE premier finance communications network.

If anything, this is one of the surest things currently around in all of crypto.
Even more so because it's so geared towards the non-crypto world of finance and business, with such a low threshold.

[Anonymous No.3602639]

>>3602629
>has backing from SWIFT
again, tell me EXACTLY what this means.

>muh, the teacher liked my poster at the science fair!
that's literally what happened. what the fuck are you smoking. you're not being integrated into SWIFT you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.3602662]

>>3602639
Oh my god.

READ the official link here from SIBOS:
https://www.sibos.com/conference/conference-programme/bridging-dlt-and-swift-messaging-smartcontractcom-innotribe-industry

>SmartContract.com will present a live demo of a Proof of Concept where a DLT platform manages ISO 20022-compliant bond instruments
>while an ISO 20022-aware Smart Oracle settles coupon payments off-ledger through ISO 20022 payment messages over SWIFT.

So if you're not immediately aware, these are TWO specific examples of use cases with direct SWIFT integration that are going to be demonstrated at SIBOS.

If you aren't paying attention, now is the time to wake up.

[Anonymous No.3602684]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Worldwide_Interbank_Financial_Telecommunication#Standards

[Anonymous No.3602702]

>>3602662
>s-s-see? we did it teacher!
Use cases are nice. But you know what actually matters?

A FUCKING PARTNERSHIP. And that is nowhere. All that has happened is a SHOWCASE WENT WELL.

And you literally fucking think SWIFT is going to fully integrate a startup that nobody ever heard of 3 months ago into all of their communications.

Ever think SWIFT creates these science fairs as a way of doing R&D for their own purposes? You really think they NEED the support of a startup?

Why not just make a blockchain application themselves that does what Link does, but better?

>that's the reason they created the science fair you dumb fucking kike

[Anonymous No.3602734]

>>3602702
You are literally whining about being EARLY here, you know that right?

If/when an actual full-blown partnership with full-blown integration would have LINK at 20 bucks a pop MINIMUM (ask me why I said 20 bucks specifically).

Get on your bony knees NOW and thank the gods that you are aware of this project RIGHT NOW.
Jesus O'Christ get your head out of your ass.

[Anonymous No.3602741]

>>3602629
out assistants use esign or cudasign along with encrypted emails why do we need bitcoin currency to do this, this technology is not practical yet and has no time table for wide scale adoption

[Anonymous No.3602754]

>>3602734
>SWIFT is going to just give away a huge portion of their communications to some random startup
The problem is that's completely unbelievable.

[Anonymous No.3602792]

>>3602734
why did you say buck?

[Anonymous No.3602823]

>>3602754
Compared to Bitcoin hitting 5000 dollars several years ago or some starving autistic child shilling his Ethereum ICO for less then pennies and it becoming being a major competitor?

[Anonymous No.3602853]

>>3602823
What major institution made Ethereum a fully integrated and critical part of their primary operations?

[Anonymous No.3602857]

>>3602734
He's right, $20 isn't some pipe dream if ripple has 7.6b MC.

[Anonymous No.3602924]

>>3602754
SWIFT are giving up nothing.
They are spearheading the mainstream adoption of crypto tech.

>>3602857
DING DING DING
LINK at $20 would put it at the Ripple market cap. Considering Chainlink does so much more, is decentralized, has a much lower threshold for old-world finance, and has backing from SWIFT, replacing Ripple is a very achievable reality in the medium term.

[Anonymous No.3602946]

>>3602741
Smart contracts would simplify traditional financial transactions and records immensely, and render them a lot more trustless.

[Anonymous No.3602958]

>>3602853
None, and yet we are at 300 dollars?

[Anonymous No.3602961]

>Not owning 100k LINK if you can easily afford to.

[Anonymous No.3602969]

>>3602924
The ripple dream will be only a dream. Chainlink will be a big player, when they srly partner with Swift and get some adoption and the live demo also reached the eypectations, but sorry, it will never reach (((their))) coin backed by (((them)))

[Anonymous No.3602988]

>>3602969
>Chainlink will be a big player, when they srly partner with Swift
Not a single crypto out there has a partnership with anything close to Swift, and they seem to be doing just fine.
Swift is just the icing on the cake.

Also, Ripple has been instigating beef with SWIFT, so chances are that SWIFT will shill Chainlink into the stratosphere to crush Ripple.

[Anonymous No.3603061]

>>3602427
It's always been under its ICO price

[Anonymous No.3603077]

>>3601626
>some cases eth
no

[Anonymous No.3603158]

>>3601553
>seriously expecting ethereum can handle billions and billions of worldwide transactions between banks

full retard

[Anonymous No.3603175]

>>3601615
found the normie. back to /r/eddit you go.

[Anonymous No.3603196]

What mobile apps are best for purchasing eth then link? My computer took a shit.

[Anonymous No.3603210]

>>3601553
explain to me who needs SWIFT when the world switches to crypto?
in case of fiat to crypto and vice versa there are smaller systems already in place, for example SEPA in eurozone or simple IRL cash tx's

[Anonymous No.3603259]

>>3603196
pretty hard! since it's only on etherdelta and if you do it on mobile then your chance of fattfingering is juge

[Anonymous No.3603265]

>>3601999
Best one yet

[Anonymous No.3603275]

>>3601999
I only hold a small amount of Link but shit, this picture makes me want to get more

[Anonymous No.3603286]

>>3601626
not anymore. there are dozens of other viable coins you can accumulate.

[Anonymous No.3603310]

>>3603259
Yeah I know, fucking ED, I'll just go buy a cheap laptop for transactions.

[Anonymous No.3603317]

>>3603286
I seriously doubt the longevity of anything that doesn't make top 10 or even top 5

[Anonymous No.3603331]

>>3603286

>actually believing this

[Anonymous No.3603356]

>>3601615
In less than a month of browsing /biz/ I've come to a point where I just see fiat as another shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.3603392]

>>3603356
because it is.
It isn't rocket science

[Anonymous No.3603401]

i just want it added to fucking liqui already. that alone will be a 5x pump, minimum.

[Anonymous No.3603408]

>>3603356
it might be the worst shitcoin in existence, it isn't backed by anything.

[Anonymous No.3603424]

>>3603356
Backed up by the military and banking sector, big difference between some coin with a dog mascot

[Anonymous No.3603429]

>>3603401
na. Kyber didn't need liqui, Link doesnt need liqui either. blackmoon got on Liqui instantly and went south. The only people interested in Link already bought on Delta because these guys arent dumb as shit

[Anonymous No.3603443]

Poorfag here, I only have 500 link. What kind of car will I get for that in 5 years?

[Anonymous No.3603466]

>>3603429
lol well it needs something other than etherdelta, that's for sure.

[Anonymous No.3603485]

>>3603466
Bittrex would be fucking GOLDEN but I don't think they will add anything till end of the year. They don't give a fuck for some reason

[Anonymous No.3603504]

If link continues to perform well on etherdelta bittrex will probably add it.
There's not any regulatory problem with it (i.e. not obviously a security).
I think Bittrex just got tired of adding shitcoins. They want to see that there's demand for LINK before they add it.

[Anonymous No.3603523]

>>3602969
>Chainlink logo is literally a cube of Saturn
>Thinking Ripple is ((their)) coin when Ripple has to fight tooth and nail to get banks to work with them in the slightest
>Chainlink is being presented by SWIFT to ALL the banks and showing it in action
Ripple isn't ((them)). Chainlink is.

[Anonymous No.3603525]

[Anonymous No.3603606]

>>3603523
Sorry bud. Nice try, i give you 7.539/10, but ripple will always be (((theirs))). Confirmed by my source. He/she/it is one of (((them)))

[Anonymous No.3603630]

>>3603356
Not bad anon. Took myself 3 months.

[Anonymous No.3603907]

>>3602702
>implying Swift could just build their own shit from scratch in a couple of months

Sergey's Chainlink is three years in the making. Absolute best case scenario (which is also realistic) is Swift ACQUIRING chainlink if everything works as planned.

[Anonymous No.3603923]

[Anonymous No.3604068]

>33.45k LINK
Am I gonna make it?

[Anonymous No.3604079]

>>3604068
no

[Anonymous No.3604084]

>>3604079
;_;

[Anonymous No.3604111]

>>3603923
Spot on.

[Anonymous No.3604158]

>>3602062
Based fudder. What are you naming your yacht?

[Anonymous No.3604194]

>>3603443
isn't that the fag from the big bang theory?

[Anonymous No.3604203]

>>3603923

ye boi

[Anonymous No.3604212]

>>3603443
when link is $1000 in 5-10 years you'll be able to afford a lambo.

Try to get at least 10k LINK to make it in the next year.

[Anonymous No.3604216]

>>3604212
>When LINK is 1trillion market cap
Kek.

[Anonymous No.3604225]

>>3601553
>not even 500k ethats
>never 500k sats
Etherdelta a shit.

[Anonymous No.3604342]

>>3604216
why make trillions when you can make... billions?

[Anonymous No.3604445]

>>3603196
Just use a computer at a library, better than sausage-fingering a purchase on a phone since EthDelta is wonky at best.

[Anonymous No.3604704]

>>3602451
HOLY FUCK!

From the Venturebeat link:

"The company has had about 3,700 emails from developers interested in running a ChainLink, Nazarov said."

[Anonymous No.3604793]

How much LINK to make it?

Will my 7.8k presale LINK get me on the moon? Or is that not even enough?

[Anonymous No.3604801]

>>3603523
Or Ripple is ((them)) until it isn't.

Enter ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.3604822]

>>3603923
>2 months
>long term
Think Ripple market cap for long term, not OMG marketcap. It could reach that by November 2017.

[Anonymous No.3604842]

How rich will I be with 1337 LINK

[Anonymous No.3604850]

>>3604842

honda civic

[Anonymous No.3604857]

What wallet should I use to store link?

[Anonymous No.3604859]

>>3604850
Can I get this one?

[Anonymous No.3604861]

> tfw you'll only be able to afford a new van instead of a villa
> cos u r a poorfag that bought 3.3k links
> tfw ur children will despise you for not pawning all ur shit for link, cos u were too scared of losing it all

Next week I'll get mah salary and will probably buy another $200 of link.
Hope it won't reach the moon until then

[Anonymous No.3604885]

>>3604859
Keep your hopes up, anon

[Anonymous No.3604890]

>>3601743

Would someone care to elaborate how to set up a node?

[Anonymous No.3604961]

>>3603158
That's not how it works.
The transactions and communication still go through the traditional channels, that's the beauty of it: low threshold.
The blockchain is simply used for proofing, security, trustlessness, ...

[Anonymous No.3604968]

>>3604857
It's ethereum based, so an ETH wallet.

http://myetherwallet.com

[Anonymous No.3605014]

>>3603210
>explain to me who needs SWIFT when the world switches to crypto?
For the same thing it's used for now: entering external data for use with smart contracts.

>in case of fiat to crypto and vice versa there are smaller systems already in place, for example SEPA in eurozone or simple IRL cash tx's
Oh boy. I suggest that you research this for more than two minutes.

[Anonymous No.3605208]

ChainLink is ONE project among others that cooperates with SWIFT. There's competition.

[Anonymous No.3605225]

>>3605208
The other ones don't have tokens that normies can buy so why would they be shilled?

[Anonymous No.3605247]

>>3605208
What are the others?
And do they have an ICO? I think not.

Regardless of its ultimate success, LINK is gonna have a pretty big moon mission and if you follow the project closely, you'll have plenty of time to sell if things start falling apart.

[Anonymous No.3605293]

>>3605247
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial/

[Anonymous No.3605322]

Been trying to buy 600 LINK on ED for the last two hours at various prices and nothing works. I've bought coins off here before and while it's overcomplicated and ridiculous I didn't have these problems before. It says order sent but then like 75% of the orders don't even show up and not a single one has completed. Meanwhile, LINK keeps climbing in value.

Fuck this piece of garbage. Was this exchange created by a 12 year old in India?

[Anonymous No.3605370]

>>3605322
I second that.

Took me ages to place a buy order. Then I get 3 copies of the same order. Cancelling 2 of them takes 5 more minutes.

F5 on ED kills my browser.

[Anonymous No.3605380]

>>3605322
the network has lots of backlogged transactions at the moment

[Anonymous No.3605402]

>>3605208

Not for this area, they are using other companies for different goals, but for this

[Anonymous No.3605422]

>>3605322
Are you making sure you are leaving enough for gas? Don't forget about that.

[Anonymous No.3605457]

>>3605208
Chainlink is the only one to work on a proof of concept and doing a live demo at SIBOS.

[Anonymous No.3605467]

Where can I buy?

[Anonymous No.3605522]

I doubt this will get much of a pump even with the big news because it isn't on polo or ttrex?

[Anonymous No.3605524]

>>3605467
Etherdelta, but if you have to ask then you should definitely google how to use the exchange first

[Anonymous No.3605541]

>>3605522
Bittrex soon.

[Anonymous No.3605558]

>>3605541
Proof?

[Anonymous No.3605568]

>>3605558
Have faith.

[Anonymous No.3605569]

>>3605208
>>3605457
>Chainlink is the only one to work on a proof of concept
More specifically: a proof of concept for and with SWIFT in particular. And they finished it.

[Anonymous No.3605572]

I believe in Chainlink so much that I actually bothered to learn and suffer through etherdelta to buy it. no other coin is good enough for me to do this for.

[Anonymous No.3605600]

It's fucking bizarre to witness how the mentality towards chainlink went from extremely agressive FUD to shilling. Talk about coordinated...

[Anonymous No.3605620]

>>3605600
Game theory in action.

[Anonymous No.3605632]

>>3605572
i almost was willing to do the same
then i clicked deposit and transfer in like 6 different spots and nothing happened and it gave me no address or instructions.
that website is garbage

[Anonymous No.3605640]

>>3601553
>partnership

They tested some tech with chainlink. It's not a partnership

[Anonymous No.3605654]

>>3605600
Also; know that the fud was virtually all memes with no actual basis in reality.
Like "2 man team", "under ICO price", "the ICO was a disaster", ...
All literally untrue.

The shilling on the other hand is legit af, and stands up to scrutiny. Like >>3600793

[Anonymous No.3605724]

>>3605640
If this were at the stage of an actual partnership, LINK would be hundreds of dollars a piece.
Be glad you're aware of this project before this happens.
Even if full-blown SWIFT integration doesn't materialize, this coin still has a golden future.

BTW, the current relationship with SWIFT is very likely one of the biggest relationships of its kind in crypto. And certainly the one with the biggest potential BY FAR.
SWIFT is huuuuuuuuuuuuuge.

[Anonymous No.3605753]

>>3605370
At this point I'm just thinking, "Well, if I just leave it as ETH I'll eventually make some money anyway..."

[Anonymous No.3605755]

>>3605632

is this some next level fud? metamask/etherdelta seems to work fine for me?

[Anonymous No.3605783]

>>3605654
yep...it's been an eye opener.

[Anonymous No.3606346]

>>3605654
yeah, anyone who had done their research could see right through the fud but most of us didn't want to raise any flags because we were still accumulating ourselves. At least that was my take on it anyway. Plus we managed to get some decent memes out of the whole ordeal.
>the oracle problem
>STILL under ICO price

[Anonymous No.3606612]

serious question, should I start the order process for my new lambo now or in October? 200k LINK daddy reporting in

[Anonymous No.3606646]

>>3601651

That was like a couple days ago, where the fuck have you been? Everyone was panicking.

[Anonymous No.3606670]

October is going to be very interesting.
I'm holding both LINK and XRP.

[Anonymous No.3606731]

You guys realize this needs a 3.6b marketcap to reach Omisego statut ?

[Anonymous No.3606754]

>>3606731
and why wouldn't it?

[Anonymous No.3606826]

>>3606754
Just saying, but in 2months 2$ is more realist than 10$

[Anonymous No.3606853]

>>3606826

$1 by the end the year would be more than enough.

[Anonymous No.3607448]

>>3606826

Been here since March 2016. I think LINK can get a real rally going once it picks up some liquidity on major exchanges.

Only speculating but I think Bitfinex may add LINK sometime soon in the future, this is based off my experience with Finex and the types of new coins they have been adding. LINK is quality, the token will demand real usage and for that will appreciate according during Node lockups.

>OMG
>SAN
>ZRX via Ethfinix

[Anonymous No.3607464]

How do I buy LINK if I only have BTC? Would I need to exchange for ETH, then exchange for LINK on ED

[Anonymous No.3607479]

>>3607464
Yes.

[Anonymous No.3607485]

>>3607464
>Would I need to exchange for ETH, then exchange for LINK on ED

yep

[Anonymous No.3607494]

>>3607479
>>3607485
damn man why the fuck can't I just pay for the shit with usd.

[Anonymous No.3607501]

>>3607494
Because it's new and obscure. But if you do the work now you'll get a better deal than if you wait.

[Anonymous No.3607528]

>>3607494

Only those who know how to mine reap the rewards of the early goldrush.

You can wait until Goldstein and his buddies deliver you crumbs on a plate or you can learn to swing a pick axe and obtain some gold.

[Anonymous No.3607539]

>>3607494
people who are making the most money bought the presale

2nd best is ICO

3rd best is people who buy on shitty pajeetdelta

don't pass this up dude

[Anonymous No.3607689]

How many LINK to become wealthy jew?

[Anonymous No.3607694]

>>3607689
300k.

[Anonymous No.3607711]

>>3607689

min 200k to lambo land reality EOY.

[Anonymous No.3607737]

>>3605755
Nah, man.
ED can take MINUTES b4 carrying out an order.
ED is shit and LINK is just another shitty coin out there.

BTW, there us no fud in "2 men team". There are still only 2 men on their team

[Anonymous No.3607760]

>>3607737
>here us no fud in "2 men team". There are still only 2 men on their team

[Anonymous No.3607781]

Reminder to submit a request to have LINK traded on Poloniex:

https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

Strongly suggest writing that you want to buy a lot of coin but do not trust EtehrDelta and need an alternative.

[Anonymous No.3607787]

>>3607781
Don't you dare to put it on polonix b4 I get my salary.

[Anonymous No.3607804]

>>3602185
haha fucking idiot, if this works we're looking at a 1T+ market cap within the next 3 years.
SWIFT has been looking for a replacement to stop the hacks for a while now https://www.databreachtoday.com/banks-regulators-react-to-swift-hack-a-9118.. From a six figure link holder to another.

[Anonymous No.3607806]

Real question:
when will you sell your LINK?

[Anonymous No.3607810]

>tfw only 30k LINK

[Anonymous No.3607824]

>>3607806
Sell based on your risk tolerance.

Some dudes it is 2x, for some 10x, for others 10000x.

There is a reason dudes are on suicide watch for Bitcoin cause their hands are weak as shit and will dump at 2x.

[Anonymous No.3607836]

>>3607806
never. i take my LINKs to my grave

[Anonymous No.3607840]

>>3607810

[Anonymous No.3607849]

>>3607824
What coin can I buy at one dollar and then cash out in a decade at 1m? Thinking it might be fapcoin lad.

[Anonymous No.3607851]

>>3607810
>tfw only 3k LINK
How am I supposed to get rich, when I can't even scrap enough money to invest it in some shady risky IT project?

[Anonymous No.3607888]

>>3607851
Those measly coins will be worth a minimum wage salary soon. Just be yourself.

[Anonymous No.3607943]

>>3607888
> minimum wage salary
I have already spent, like, 1 average salary in my country on these 3k (which is 4 minimum wage).
Gonna hold till it reaches the moon

[Anonymous No.3607985]

>>3607943
Bless your heart, Pajeet. Just keep holding. We're gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.3608600]

How hard is Link going to fall when it becomes apparent that their presentation is just that, a presentation at a conference, and does not equate a partnership?

I really do hope they succeed, because I want you faggots to have lambos, but why would you knowingly blow things this out of proportion and fuck yourself over when the presentation takes place? Do you all intend to dump before the presentation?

[Anonymous No.3608651]

XRP vs LINK. Choose 1 fellas

[Anonymous No.3608687]

>>3608600
do ur own reseaecrh faggot/ LINK is partnered with SIBOS to do all their money exchanges within the interconnected banking system. EAT A Ddik

[Anonymous No.3608704]

>>3608600
It frustrates me when people exaggerate things and it ends up backfiring. I posted the old Buterin tweet about SmartContract.com on /biz/ weeks ago to show that the company has been around for a long time working on oracles. Then people used it as if he was talking about ChainLink and the ICO. There's no need to exaggerate for ChainLink, this is a good project and should do well on its own without over-hyping news.

[Anonymous No.3608706]

>>3608687
>LINK is partnered with SIBOS

Sibos is an event. It's a fucking conference, not an organization, you dumb cunt.

I ask again, why would you knowingly blow things this out of proportion and fuck yourself over when the presentation takes place? Do you all intend to dump before the presentation?

[Anonymous No.3608731]

>>3608706
EAT A FUCKING DICK U TIRED OL HAGFAG
i said SIBOS

[Anonymous No.3608780]

>>3608731

kys

[Anonymous No.3608792]

>>3608780
SIBOS SIBOS SIBOS SIBOS SIBOS
I want u to take a sticl
and jam it up ur fuckin ass

[Anonymous No.3608822]

>>3608731
I hope you keep holding till after the conference.

[Anonymous No.3608852]

>>3608706
>being this new
Listen, if he exaggerates the upside prior to the event, then he can FUD more effectively afterwards if people sell the news, claiming that LINKies are delusional about "a SIBOS partnership lol." Some of the people over-hyping now, were FUDing earlier.

It's called trolling.

[Anonymous No.3608877]

> tfw 80k b a s e d L I N K

[Anonymous No.3608893]

>>3608877

>80k link

[Anonymous No.3608900]

why can't you stupid fucking babies work out how to used ED? I'm a stacy and I worked it out fine I just followed the steps on the ED reddit you dumbfucks

[Anonymous No.3608915]

>>3608893
jam that stick up your ass, faggot

>>3608900
you're not a stacey

[Anonymous No.3608917]

>>3608852
Nah, this shit isn't just people spreading FOMO. You give /biz/ way too much credit.

Wait for the pink wojak annihilation following the conference.

[Anonymous No.3608918]

>>3608900

How much BTC to be my crypto waifu?

[Anonymous No.3608925]

HONESTLY GUYS

PLEASE BE HONEST WITH ME HERE

ive got 70 eth and 7k link

should i be putting more eth into link or is it not worth the risk?

where is this shit honestly going? whats all the swift shit mean?

[Anonymous No.3608938]

>>3608925
LINK is literally gong to $5 each, minimum, after the SIBOS festival.

[Anonymous No.3608941]

>>3608925

kill yourself you dumb fuck better yet send me your eth since youre never getting to the moon

[Anonymous No.3608944]

>>3608925

SIBOS DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD

[Anonymous No.3608949]

>>3608925
Price will increase until the conference on the 16th October. Then it'll fucking tank because people here and everywhere else are hyping it way out of proportion.

So short term it's a safe bet.

[Anonymous No.3608954]

>>3608941
stfu you say you're a woman but if you are you aren't a stacey. you're an uggo.

[Anonymous No.3608957]

>>3608893
remember, stay poor

[Anonymous No.3608960]

>>3608949

SIBOS, BRUHH

[Anonymous No.3608963]

JUST
SIBOS MY SHIT UP

[Anonymous No.3608974]

>>3608925
Buy in while it's stuck in etherdelta hell and dirt cheap.

I'm honestly expecting this to be a top 20 token within 6 months, and a low top 10 within a year or two. In case you're retarded that's 10x within 6 months and 50x within a year or two.

[Anonymous No.3608973]

>>3608925
How is 70eth going to make you rich? Stupid fuck.

[Anonymous No.3608975]

>>3608954

are u mad me and my chad bf had sex this morning but also researched the fuck out of LINK and know what the oracle problem is and what SIBOS means and understand what it is we invest in lmfao

[Anonymous No.3608985]

>>3608975
YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT EXCDEPT HOW TO BE UGLY
SIBOS, BRUH
SIBOS, BRUH

[Anonymous No.3609009]

>>3608941
>>3608973
yall sound like projecting poorfags

>>3608949
will it hit a real exchange before then? i dont mind buying on ED but selling takes too much time.

[Anonymous No.3609022]

>>3608938

lol

[Anonymous No.3609024]

>>3609009
yeah i know fuck selling on ED. it better be on liqui soon. fuckin kyber got there day 1 why isn't LINK there yet

[Anonymous No.3609142]

>>3609024

>i-it'll be on l-liqui any day now, r-righht guys?

Lol pathetic LINKies, look at ED it's fucking crashing rn.

[Anonymous No.3609144]

>>3609009
>will it hit a real exchange before then?

Nobody knows.

[Anonymous No.3609202]

>>3609024
Sergey didn't push to get it on there. Kyber did.

t. 100k link hodler

[Anonymous No.3609218]

>>3609202
FUCKING SERGEY GET YOUR ASS MOVING'
YOU WORK FOR US NOW

[Anonymous No.3609242]

>1 billion coin supply
>2 devs
>no deal with Swift
>Will not be listed on a reputable exchange because Link did not do a KYC for ico
>poorly run ICO
>eth to soon realize a better Oracle solution

[Anonymous No.3609267]

>>3609242

This. LINK has no real value, as stated by money skel himself. Expect this to drop pretty hard soon, and I say that as a LINK holder, but I'm selling everything now.

[Anonymous No.3609376]

>>3609267
More FUD, haven't accumulated enough yet huh?

[Anonymous No.3609390]

>>3609267
>>3609376

[Anonymous No.3609438]

alright just bought 4k more link and have another order for 5k up

[Anonymous No.3609534]

Just scooped up 30k link from nolinkers on ED

Poor fucks

[Anonymous No.3609699]

>>3601553
Define "a decent amount"

[Anonymous No.3609699,1]

nice

[Anonymous No.3609699,2]

200k+
This shit ain't goin over $5