Economic Systems

[Delius !!xfoM8CvQ5sS No.33941]

Hello and welcome to 4chan, /biz/nessmen, I hope you enjoy your stay because you're here forever.

With that out of the way, I'm going to posit a few personal questions to you all:

1) What kind of economy are you for? the Free Market, planned economy, mixed economy, or some other economy?

I personally think that the mixed economy sounds great right off the bat, though I haven't much experience with economics in the first place so I have not much evidence to back it up.

2) Are there any other systems besides Capitalism/Socialism/Communism? I've heard about Syndicalism but I haven't a clue what it is, can anyone explain it to the best of his ability? I am willing to read every single word so do not worry about keeping it short, say everything that you deem important.

3) Personally I hang between paleoconservatism and fascism. While I do know that a free market is emphasized within the paleoconservative spectrum, what economic system is emphasized within the fascist spectrum?

4) Pros and Cons of the economic system that you have chose for question 1.

5) Pros and Cons of the economic system that you most despise.

Thank you for your time businessmen, I seek to learn a great deal from you. Oh, and one more question:

6) Personal opinion of the Federal Reserve, great idea or great mistake?

[Delius !!xfoM8CvQ5sS No.34036]

Bump.

[Delius !!xfoM8CvQ5sS No.34136]

2nd bump.

[Delius !!xfoM8CvQ5sS No.34516]

3rd bump

[Anonymous No.34539]

>>33941
>what economic system is emphasized within the fascist spectrum?

Hardcore central planning and nationalization, such as what FDR engaged in.

[Delius !!xfoM8CvQ5sS No.34566]

>>34539
Thank you for your answer.

[PlατΩ ( ´∀｀) !!kGRAAvdSlhs No.34601]

1) Economics ain't a rigorously solvable problem. I am generally pro-free market, but I also like the idea of a pure command economy(none of this half-assed welfare state shit tho).

2) You can make up whatever kind of system you want. You could believe in Georgism or Social Credit. I'm somewhat neo-feudalist and theocratic.

3) Prussian socialism. <3

6) Eh.

[Anonymous No.34611]

>>34539
FDR's plan didn't do anything most of his policies only did temporary thinks like build roads and shovel dirt. They had no real impact on the economy until the US entered the War. Americans then didn't know what a real economy was because of the twenties and Fascism and other Central Planning ideas were basically defaulting and ignoring the law and moral decency to achieve public satisfaction.

[Anonymous No.34620]

>Discussions of government policy must be strictly limited to economic policies (fiscal and monetary). Discussions of a political nature should be posted on >>>/pol/.

[Anonymous No.34688]

1. Mixed Economy.

2. Well, there's war socialism (everything goes to the war, no exceptions) but that's about it. The three systems you describe are a pretty wide range of ideas.

3. I don't think this is a question.

4. Pros: Manages externalities and market failures while maintaining competitiveness and minimizing market distortions.

Cons: Bland ideologically. Business is still extremely influential, and can steer government intervention in the economy to its own advantage.

5. Gommunism

Pros: Immediately turns the resources of a society to the service of whatever is deemed as a national need. Can provide opportunities that are missing in a free market society.

Cons: Total lack of incentives. Hunger will always be used as a political weapon to ensure loyalty. Central planning is often inefficient. Generally triggers extreme political violence against whoever gets in the way.

6. Good idea. Markets naturally have a cycle which ends in a severe crash. Some direct input into monetary policy helps to prevent economic panics and recessions from snowballing into collapses.

[PlατΩ ( ´∀｀) !!kGRAAvdSlhs No.35028]

>>34539

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXhkJHjO0Qo

Why don't you listen to what a paleoconservative member of the Mises Institute has to say about it?

Mussolini said private property is a sacred right.

[Anonymous No.35090]

>>33941
1. Free Market

2. eh

3.Socialism, Fascism is the non international version of it.

4.
Pro: Regulated economy with respect to prices, if monopoly and oligarchy are put in check.
con: Advertising, pollution, unnecessary production(which can drive down cost) explotation.
5. Communism
pro: Rapid industrial development, Completed Public Works, Standardization
con: No Capital(aka. no money), wealth destruction, social theft, lack of reliable pricing mechanism, oppression and moral corruption.
6. The Federal Reserve is the lethal threat to a Free Market System. America went decades without a central bank and most of the Super wealthy companies came from that era. End the Inflation Economy, Peace through Prosperity.

[Anonymous No.35355]

>>34688
>Total lack of incentives
You do realize there are billionaires in the world's mixed economy

[Anonymous No.35420]

>>35090
>if monopoly and oligarchy are put in check
So, a mixed economy then

[Anonymous No.35584]

>>35355
That's why I said that was a problem with communism.

[Anonymous No.35844]

>>33941
1) Free market
2) None worth mentioning
3) A keynesian/marxist blend of economics is the main system in a fascist society
4) Pros: most efficient form of economics, rapid growth, increased stability, etc
Cons: minimal regulation means minimal environmental protection, and minimal cultural control
5) Communism
Pros: rapid industrialization
cons: hopelessly inefficient, no freedom
6) I believe the Federal reserve should be a federal institution, and should have its power limited to only controlling the money supply, heavy restrictions on bailing out corporations, and I would consider dismantling the Fed, would take some convincing however.

[Anonymous No.36093]

>>35420
mixed only in the sense of a light touch.