Why hold LINK?

[Anonymous No.30257797]

Seriously, it pumps less than grandpa Bitcoin but always dumps 2x so what's the point?

[Anonymous No.30257900]

I like the way it hurts

[Anonymous No.30257980]

Dig into anything in the crypto space beyond the surface level talking heads summaries.
Understand that we are in a transition period from speculation to adoption that takes months/years.
Then place your bet.
Or play the shitcoin casino for quick bucks, I'm not your dad, he left when you were little.

[Anonymous No.30257989]

100% of my portfolio is link

[Anonymous No.30258372]

>>30257797
I owe it to sergey

[Anonymous No.30258715]

>>30257980
>Bla bla bla
Didn't answer the question. Why hold LINK when even Bitcoin is not only a safer pick but better performing?

[Anonymous No.30258728]

>>30257797
Your simplistic view of the btc/linc correlation isn't reflected in the btc/link chart. It actually trends (up and down). Right now on a downtrend, yes, but it's not feasible to try and predict when it'll turn around... So I'd just rather be all in linkies all the time.

Oh, and taxes.

t. 7 fig hell resident

[Anonymous No.30259062]

because its not about the pump or dump anymore its a cult, you're either in or not.

[Anonymous No.30259206]

>>30258728
It is simple and it happens every time.
BTC dumps 5% - LINK dumps 10%.

[Anonymous No.30259304]

>>30259206
if its so simple then why are you still poor?

[Anonymous No.30260000]

>>30257900
This. Checked.

[Anonymous No.30260059]

>>30257980
>doption that takes months/years.
>he thinks there will be a post federal reserve age

[Anonymous No.30260099]

>>30257797
The people who hold it are delusion retards who think it's going to become the NWO token or something. Doesn't make sense since it's just a json parser, maybe if it was a schema that would make it a bit more useful but json is a shit language and no one has been able to make one yet

[Anonymous No.30260304]

>>30260000
Double checked.

[Anonymous No.30260374]

>>30258715
Until link flips btc

[Anonymous No.30260507]

I cant believe i bought this shitcoin at 30 cents

[Anonymous No.30261109]

>>30257797
Link had its day in the sun, time to move on to something else. Bat feels like early link now.

[Anonymous No.30261333]

>>30260507
if only we could reverse time and buy bitcoin instead I wouldn't have to worry about managing all this money

[Anonymous No.30261380]

>>30257989
Our time will come.. r-right bros?

[Anonymous No.30261449]

>>30257989
>>30261380
Only once all hope has been completely lost will it green candle immediately to 81k

[Anonymous No.30261475]

>>30257900
i love the feeling of sergeys rough cock in my ass

[Anonymous No.30262013]

The reason it wont moon is because you all lack faith! You’re always doubting and complaining, just HAVE A LITTLE GODDAMN FAITH AND THINGS WILL BE FUCKING FINE!!

[Anonymous No.30262042]

>>30257900

At this point im addicted to his dumps like a hoe who wont leave tue chad that beats her

[Anonymous No.30262282]

We are now at a time when /biz/ has less faith in Chainlink than banking giants.
If ever you wanted to see a buy signal based on the sentiment of an anonymous Faroe scrimshaw discussion board, this would be it.

[Anonymous No.30262373]

>>30258728

based

[Anonymous No.30262426]

The point was to buy at 20c when it was shilled here. If you haven't made it at link for $30 nobody can help you.

[Anonymous No.30262464]

>>30262426
>made it at link for $30
When Prajeet has the best English in the village.

[Anonymous No.30262685]

>>30262464
rude

[Anonymous No.30262777]

Link will have its AAVE pump when it actually starts to be used to its potential.
I hold both, link and avlave (and btc, eth). I buy when it dumps hardest.

[Anonymous No.30263094]

>>30262777
Checked.

Pretty amazing to see a project that relies on Chainlink for its backbone explode like that while Chainlink sputters along.

[Anonymous No.30263337]

>>30257797

I put 25k link on aave as collateral and borrowed 125k to put into bancor, making nice gains now. I might take out some more money and look for other investments this week. At least my link has some use now instead of sitting in cold storage, should have done this sooner.

[Anonymous No.30263346]

>>30263094
>Pretty amazing to see a project that relies on Chainlink for its backbone explode like that while Chainlink sputters along.

[Anonymous No.30263426]

>>30263337
Look into staking link on BlockFi or Celsius. 5.66% and 5.55% APY reslectively. At your own risk of course and BlockFi is KYC but its legit.

[Anonymous No.30263482]

>>30263426

Thanks, I already have some Link spread across those platforms. There are a lot of options for linkies who are waiting for the singularity to get some passive income now. It gives so much peace of mind, I get a middle class monthly wage from crypto now so I don’t have to think about the price of Link anymore and can live my life.

[Anonymous No.30263658]

>>30262282
Where can I find this report? All I can find are articles about the report.

[Anonymous No.30263782]

>2017+4
>Arbitrum patent approved
>staking patches implemented
>Citibank says Link can surpass Bitcoin
>people still don't DYOR

[Anonymous No.30263797]

>>30263482
Based comfyanon. Oh did you send your link from coinbase btw? I guess CB has a retarded 1% fee completely negating me sending it

[Anonymous No.30263828]

>>30263658
Those articles typically link to the report in the first paragraph.

[Anonymous No.30263841]

nooooooooooo i solled

[Anonymous No.30263925]

>>30263828
Kek I must have clicked on the only ones with a fucking paywall. Thanks, I'll go check again.

[Anonymous No.30263948]

>>30263925
Look for the crypto specific news sites.

[Anonymous No.30263987]

>>30263782
>arb
>staking
Had no clue, reading arb tweet now. Knew about citibank though. Thanks for spoonfeeding this 2019 latefag anon, have a serg.

[Anonymous No.30264070]

>>30263782
>>Arbitrum patent approved
No, Princeton held the patent and Arbitrum got Princeton to waive it.
Meaning they won't owe licencing fees to Princeton.

[Anonymous No.30264071]

>>30263797

Nah all my link are on my offline wallets

[Anonymous No.30264092]

>>30263948
Found the pdf on news.bitcoin.com
Nuts that it's a 108 page report on bitcoin and then just casually drops chainlink on page 98/99 like it's nothing. Right next to the big boys bitcoin and ethereum.

[Anonymous No.30264143]

>>30257797
I know it hurts. I've held for way too long too. You gotta let go, even if it's painful. Because sometimes holding on can hurt more

[Anonymous No.30264152]

>>30264092
Right? And then casually throws in "oh yeah and it can surpass bitcoin some day too". Just like we've all been saying.

[Anonymous No.30264172]

>>30264092
Yeah, and they accurately analysed that the greatest value lies in making blockchains usable in the real world; not in the basic blockchains themselves.

[Anonymous No.30264200]

>>30261380
It pumped 50x in a year. How much are you hoping it’d pump? Sell some and move on to a new coin with potential. Don’t get too emotional invested, especially to something that did a 50x.

[Anonymous No.30264253]

>>30257797
you had 3 years you retarded fudder. Even if it pumps less than Bogs' heart vessel, im still way up. Keep coping.

[Anonymous No.30264376]

>>30263987
Bless you.

>>30264070
>basically agreed with me
Okay retard.

[Anonymous No.30265287]

What really hurt is that link does jack shit when news like citi shilling drops. Any other shitcoin would have done a x2-3 in the next 24h if it were to happen to it.

[Anonymous No.30265391]

>>30265287
further proof that its highly manipulated cause the real value of LINK could potentially be higher than the whole of crypto. get more before you can't.

[Anonymous No.30265481]

>>30265391
Already all in with Aave loans on top of it

[Anonymous No.30265498]

>>30264376
>>basically agreed with me
Not at all lol

[Anonymous No.30265508]

>>30264200
>x50 in a year
No it did xInfinity in a year because it flash crashed to 0 in covid march 2020 dump.
But in human real prices it didn't even do x10 in a year.

[Anonymous No.30265509]

>>30259206
It's like the retards here don't actually look at the graphs longer than 24 hour periods. You day trading faggots don't understand anything beyond that.

BTC dumps 5% - Link Dumps 10%. Alright, so when BTC pumps 500% in the next 10 years, Link will pump 250%

So why hold Link over BTC? Because due to the price you can accumulate more of it with fiat and it's more safe to diversify on longterm holds - and the project is worth investing in.

Like how these retards shit on ETH because they cant see the longterm vision of the project but then companies like Amazon buy into it and ETH 2.0 is around the corner and if you were to pump more fiat into ETH right now and hold it compared to BTC you would see a larger ROI.

That doesn't mean you shouldn't diversify, it just means if you are longterm holding you should be putting the larger sum of your money into investments that will make you more money 5 years from now.

So when ETH hits 30,000 in the next couple of years and BTC is over 100,000 you aren't kicking yourself because you refused to diversify. It's the same with LINK.

Hold multiple coins but put more into the ones that will give you a higher ROI. Diversify. That's why you should hold LINK.

[Anonymous No.30265604]

>>30265509
also to add to this, stop putting fiat into projects that are complete ETH rip offs and aren't going to go anywhere.

Solid projects that will be around like 5 years from now
>LINK
>DOT
>ADA
>BTC
>ETH

then find coins that aren't complete and utter shit with low buy in low market cap value and take a bit of risk but research the projects and understand what they are.

[Anonymous No.30265657]

>>30260099
>json is a shit language
json isn't a language retard... this is the sort of fucking idiot trying to give you financial advice on this board