Citibank says Chainlink could be bigger than bitcoin

[Anonymous No.30082596]

No threads on this?

https://ir.citi.com/peFJTnzeEoMSIAEFlwH12VeM5d%2BCckWNrsO9lxpmyWezrz5V%2Bx%2FfRvm0gv6cWRpDHGWtIk7sTME=

Pages 98-99

[Anonymous No.30082744]

>>30082596
imagine thinking CitiBank knows anything about where crypto is headed. If they did they'd have bought Bitcoin years ago

[Anonymous No.30082813]

>>30082744
cope

1 chainlink will be worth more than 1 btc in less than 5 years time

[Anonymous No.30083026]

We had threads on this. You had 3 years. Institutions are merely catching up to what we realized long ago.

[Anonymous No.30083055]

>>30082596
Yeah we had about 50 threads about this yesterday while you were jerking off

[Anonymous No.30083178]

[Anonymous No.30083413]

Just wait until normie money starts flooding in with the grayscale trust this week

[Anonymous No.30083640]

>>30082596
The amount of foresight this board has had over the years continues to astound me.

[Anonymous No.30083766]

>>30082813
You mean the Chainlink network will be more valuable than the Bitcoin one in 5 years? Chainlink has 50 times the circulating supply of BTC.

[Anonymous No.30083771]

>>30083413
Pardon?

[Anonymous No.30083794]

>>30083640
I'm convinced most people here are INTJ. Well suited to foresight and investing in general

[Anonymous No.30083864]

Nice. Just bought another ETH.

[Anonymous No.30083873]

Worked with Citi in 2018. In 2016 they had a trial with XRP to see if it would work

It wouldn't work for a myriad of reasons but one of the most important being that even if Citi and the larger payment providers moved to XRP, all the small providers especially in poorer countries would not be moving to XRP and so it would always be doomed to fail.

[Anonymous No.30083939]

>>30082596
jewish banks pumping fiat shit coins...

[Anonymous No.30084022]

>>30083794
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-_r4TTlnbk

[Anonymous No.30084059]

>>30082596
That’s not what it says retard. It says a work token could be developed that eclipses Bitcoin, not that it is specifically going to be LINK. It could be GRT or some other internet 3.0 token.

[Anonymous No.30084066]

>>30082596
People are willfully misinterpreting it because they have hopium goggles on. It’s just a prospectus, one of many that put out every year, and it came to the totally legitimate conclusion that a project that secures the growing crypto infrastructure could overtake bitcoin. Because crypto is developing into something that is more than currency or store of wealth. They used chainlink as an example of a utility token that could achieve this, but they didn’t say that chainlink will overtake bitcoin. It’s great to see chainlink mentioned this way, and it’s good to know that people in major institutions are thinking about it, but reign it in a little. This probably won’t effect price action, and if you get overexcited about something like this you’re setting yourself up for disappointment in the weeks and months before you get your next dopamine hit.

[Anonymous No.30084122]

>>30084022
It's not a horoscope. Those tests show you exactly what you put in.

[Anonymous No.30084181]

>>30082596
Chainlink is a utility token that will eventually stabilize. Same thing will happen with GRT.

[Anonymous No.30084224]

>>30083766
no he means 1 LINK token will be worth more than one BTC

the flippening will happen

[Anonymous No.30084280]

>>30082596
Also we had thread up literally hours after it was released

[Anonymous No.30084299]

>>30084122
>implying anyone can honestly and objectively rank their values on a meme test to diagnose their personality
>implying people wont just pick the answers that will "diagnose" them with a desired result
careful bucko. you're startin to sound like a libra

[Anonymous No.30084403]

>>30084299
Not everyone is incapable of self-reflection.

[Anonymous No.30084455]

>>30084403
Based. OP is just an NPC

[Anonymous No.30084524]

>>30084022
>>30084122

Non analysts MBTI hate it because it basically says they are worthless normies while analysts are top tier people. Horoscopes please people. MBTI does not. There is a video I saw forever ago where a trading group tested their followers of hundreds of people and just over 80% of INTJs were profitable. The next highest personality type was around 55%.

t. 2017 LINK buyer

[Anonymous No.30084611]

>>30084524
brb gonna retake the test and choose the right answers so i can get INTJ and make more money

[Anonymous No.30084625]

>>30084224
So Link market cap will be more than 50 times higher than BTC?

Meanwhile, in reality:
> 58k sats

But I guess now you'll tell me sats don't matter? They only matter when you dream of getting to a 1:1 ratio uh?

Bunch of hypocritical moonbois really

[Anonymous No.30084674]

>>30084625
>Link market cap will be more than 50 times higher than BTC
Yes.

[Anonymous No.30084704]

>>30082596
this joke of a company opened up thousands of new branches, and went on a hiring spree just a year before the pandemic. their predictive capabilities are shit.

[Anonymous No.30084731]

>>30082596
Citibank also said Ethereum was going to be bigger than Bitcorn. Do yourself a favor and buy as much of both as possible.

[Anonymous No.30084739]

>>30083766
Yes. The supply has nothing to do with it. The market cap is what counts, and Link's market capcould surpass that of Bitcoin, is what it means, anon.

[Anonymous No.30084776]

>>30084611

Yea it would be pretty easy after you take the test for the first time. If you aren't honest with yourself (hint most people aren't even when there is nothing really at stake) then it doesn't work. If you go into the test the first time and answer honestly its surprisingly accurate

[Anonymous No.30084797]

>>30084674
Yeah well start by getting to 100k sats again then we can talk lol. Your shitcoin has been catering in sats, maybe look at that before saying it'll flip the king

[Anonymous No.30084874]

>>30083794
whenever i take it im either ENFP or ENFJ, but my whole life people have said im able to project forward and see things that many cant which i never understood. but its also why im really fucking good at my job which involves a lot of creativity and projecting how people will use things. no joke i wish this was just my ego but what takes me 20 minutes would take most people in my field prob a week or two to figure out. its why i have 4 high profile companies constantly fighting for my time kek. anyways, point is i think youre right that most people here who've had success have to be able to recognize certain patterns passively, and have to be able to project forward in a pragmatic way which is really difficult to do for most

[Anonymous No.30084891]

>>30083413
There is no fucking chance of this happening this week. Whales would not be stubbornly fighting price increases if their exchange buddies were telling them about Greyscale on the downlow.

[Anonymous No.30084900]

>Pages 98-99

[Anonymous No.30084937]

>>30082596
OLD NEWS DOOFUS

[Anonymous No.30085032]

>>30083939
>fiat
>shitcoin
does not know what fiat means

[Anonymous No.30085115]

>>30082596
pretty goo for a json parser

[Anonymous No.30085122]

>>30084874
The word you're looking for is anticipating. Not projecting. Anticipating, modelling are skills. They are not personality types. Something that comes up with the INTJ type is a tendency to ruminate, contingency plan, and reduce contingencies to patterns to make them more flexible and applicable.

What you're describing is what a bright person with strong synthesis and emergent thought would experience while their personality has them flitting about.

[Anonymous No.30085176]

>>30084704
>predicting black swans

[Anonymous No.30085201]

>>30082813
BTC will be around $3 in 5 years time when everyone moves to coins with a use.

[Anonymous No.30085312]

>>30085201
My monero stacks will be pleased.

[Anonymous No.30085351]

>>30084299
All knowledge is arbitrary. All language is imprecise. What matters with MBTI is that the framework is internally consistent and more than 50% accurate in its assertions. Don't let hubris keep you from a tool.

[Anonymous No.30085436]

>>30082744
true
also, chainlink is on ethereum, so...

[Anonymous No.30085521]

>>30084891
>Chainlink didn't try to make a break for it today
>Bitcoin didn't immediately start dumping after Link went over $30

[Anonymous No.30085527]

>>30085122
>>30085351
this nigga serious

[Anonymous No.30085597]

>>30085115
Who's Jason?

[Anonymous No.30085607]

21 BTC = 1000 LINK