UNN - You fell for it

[Anonymous No.29196889]

I can’t believe there’s actually retards on here that this coin is going to do 50x. At worst, it’s a deliberate rugpull and at best, it’s chinky pajeet coin that’s making promises it has no capability of delivering on. All anyone with a brain needs to do see this is look at the name of the website: Unn.finance. Dot fucking finance KEK. Name me one legit coin that’s “.finance”. You can’t, you absolute mongoloid. The idiots behind this didn’t even realize all the ERC20 .finance hype was last summer and tried to rope you morons in with that anyway. Most of you didn’t fall for it (hence the 2x pump), and it couldn’t even hold that. I’m actually baffled at the fact that there are people on this board holding a .finance coin (that’s not BSC - the new flavour of the month) hoping for a 50x in fucking 2021. Press S to spit on the graves on these fools. Enjoy your bleed of sats to zero.

[Anonymous No.29197180]

>>29196889
>actually retards on here that this coin is going to do 50x
That would be me. Am I the only retard here still holding this?

[Anonymous No.29197196]

>>29197180
i sold today lol

[Anonymous No.29197359]

>>29197180
yes.

[Anonymous No.29197446]

>>29196889
Flare.finance

[Anonymous No.29197498]

>>29197446
Flr.finance*

[Anonymous No.29197644]

>>29196889
Is this some weird reverse psychology FUD to try and get some interest in this coin?

It's a cool project... Not sure what it could pump to though. It seems like a rank 100-200 market cap project at best.

[Anonymous No.29197891]

>>29197644
Yeah I’m thinking the same thing. There was a thread similar to this earlier

[Anonymous No.29197901]

>>29197498
Lmao, are you trying to out yourself as a pajeet? They’re literally using the website template as unn.finance. These jeet finance scams can’t even bother making a webpage that’s not copy paste of some other jeet finance site

[Anonymous No.29198171]

>>29197180
They will have a product soon and they will be releasing more updates after launch throughout the years adding more features.

[Anonymous No.29198312]

>>29197644
>Not sure what it could pump to though
It could pump to 0.057. Parties been over for a week now and you’re holding the bags

[Anonymous No.29198488]

>>29196889
Who makes a thread to shit on this niche /biz/ coin? This suspicious activity reminds of the just a wallet Parsiq fud.

[Anonymous No.29198596]

Damn this fud is good. I'm not holding because I'm a Coinbase faggot, but this.....god. This and LTO will do an easy 20x this bull run. Most def a 12 month hold but if you have an extra 1k laying around.. def invest.

[Anonymous No.29198728]

>>29198488
>>29196889
>Name me one legit coin that’s “.finance”.
honestly now that he's mentioned it, it is a somewhat valid point. and the website looks exactly the same as >>29197901
its starting to seem like some bullshit to me as a holder. it hasn't been fun holding this since december

[Anonymous No.29198860]

>>29198596
sometimes FUD is legit...
>Most def a 12 month hold
thats not how it works. if BTC takes the market down with it (likely to happen well before 12 months) before this moons then this will dump to hell and stay there for years even if it is legit

[Anonymous No.29198890]

>>29198728
this shit >>29197901
doesn't have a whitepaper or partnerships with the big names.
Also UNN has big name investors.

[Anonymous No.29199078]

>>29198860
You're an absolute faggot if you think BTC will "crash" within 12 months. Will it retrace back down to the 30k range? Most definitely. Will it immediately get bought back up by non-paper handed faggots and immediately go up to 200k? Also most definitely.

This is the bitcoin super cycle. The fed said money go brrrrrrrrrrr. Don't expect the actual crash until "Biden" is about to leave office.

[Anonymous No.29199195]

>>29198890
>doesn't have a whitepaper
even more of a red flag that they're using the same web template as a straight up scam. if they're so good why can't they make an original website?
>>29198890
>Also UNN has big name investors
thats literally the only bullish thing about UNN, but has anyone actually confirmed the role of these investors? They could have literally been given extremely cheap coin in order to be slapped on the website. they have nothing to lose by accepting deals like that. its not big investors have never made poor decisions in the past

[Anonymous No.29199356]

>>29199195
So investors put their reputation on the line for a cheap cut on a coin that, in your words, is set to do NOTHING. And this makes sense to you, the idea that Alameda Research and Bering Waters are mere billboards for shitcoins?

[Anonymous No.29199368]

>>29199078
>This is the bitcoin super cycle
non argument. you're a delusional retard if you dont think the top is close. Btc and crypto has been straight bull for almost a year now and normies/niggers are talking about getting rich off their dogecoin stock

[Anonymous No.29199409]

>>29199195
UNN devs locked their tokens so there is no rug pull. And we got a geyser.
And why would investors spend over 3 million dollars on a shitcoin rug pull?

[Anonymous No.29199470]

>decided to buy a 100k suicide stack yesterday
>next day is filled with people nonstop fudding the coin
fml i really can't win

[Anonymous No.29199497]

>>29199356
>>29199409
>So investors put their reputation on the line for a cheap
>investment goes tits up
>"oh well, happens sometimes. look at all these other good ones we've made"
>all is forgiven
you sound like those reddit retards that thought hedgies would get BTFO for over-shorting gme stock

[Anonymous No.29199515]

>>29198171
You really think they can go from testnet to full launch by the end of March? They just got the testnet up two weeks ago.

[Anonymous No.29199531]

>>29199470
this fud is weak anon. ygmi with that stack

[Anonymous No.29199548]

>>29199470

relax. we are acooomulating

[Anonymous No.29199596]

>>29199356
>So investors put their reputation on the line for a cheap cut on a coin that, in your words, is set to do NOTHING.
fwiw the token does in fact do literally nothing

muh governance

[Anonymous No.29199602]

I got in at 1.6c and bought 100k, don't really care if i lose it or not, gonna hold for a year and see. little money, low risk entry

[Anonymous No.29199607]

>>29199195
I can see it failing to actually implement it's product; that's a risk we are obviously willing to take, but I am completely unphased by your paranoia that it's a rugpull. They have a partnership with Kleros, a team very concerned about it's associations.

I mean there was a UNN thread about 12 hours ago warning they were going to rugpull 5m UNN because they were convinced it was rugpull scam and nothing seemed to happened. (I haven't even bothered to check, I just don't care.) Lets just agree to disagree. You remain a schizo, like the many on this board warning about the implement doomsday event of X crypto, and I will hold the bag and accept the consequences if it rugpulls.

[Anonymous No.29199665]

>>29199470
trust me fren, I feel the same way. I'm still holding this but the more I look into it the more shady it seems. Literally the only bullish points for this are
>muh partnerships
>muh investors
sounds like some 2017 tier shitcoin bullshit

>>29199607
>completely unphased by your paranoia that it's a rugpull
i never said that you retard

[Anonymous No.29199682]

>>29199515
yes
>>29199470
I bought a 200k stack and staking over half of it.
>>29199596
why is BTC not on dex? because there is no governance preventing a rug pull. WBTC needs the BTC it came from to be secured.

[Anonymous No.29199743]

>>29199497
Investors lose money all the time, but you can't negate a long reputation of successful trades, nor the research a firm like Alameda puts into a new buy, without any rhyme or reason. Your rationale is -- your words, not mine -- that they wanted a discount on a shitcoin, and to get it for cheapies, they chose to advertise it on their website... as if they're some geocities page for hookers.

[Anonymous No.29200083]

>>29199743
>that they wanted a discount on a shitcoin, and to get it for cheapies
I said it was possible. private investors usually get pretty big discounts for coins so that in itself isn't sketchy. whats sketchy to me is they're promising revolutionary technology but can't even come up with a website that isn't a copy paste of another .finance clone. Alameda isn't out looking at every single website. They could have been proposed the tech, which admittedly would be huge if delivered, and accepted an offer for private placement. And like I said, if it goes tits up they really have nothing to lose.

[Anonymous No.29200191]

>>29200083
people were talking shit about LINK for years and they keep partnering with others just like UNN.

[Anonymous No.29200370]

>>29200191
>people were talking shit about LINK for years
seriously? that's your fucking argument? people were also talking shit about bitconnect, what's your point?

[Anonymous No.29200462]

>>29200370
bitconnect was based on promise and no proof.
why would other companies partner with a shitcoin that will crash and be useless.

[Anonymous No.29200536]

>>29198312
Never bought

[Anonymous No.29200602]

>>29200462
>why would other companies partner with a shitcoin
As I already said, on paper it looks really good. What proof have they provided other than screenshots of a testnet? All I'm seeing right now is a ripoff website promising the world

[Anonymous No.29200673]

>>29200602
well lets all wait for product launch and then you can buy in much higher than we did.

[Anonymous No.29200750]

Very bullish thread

[Anonymous No.29200962]

>>29200602
The website looks better than many, anon. You're discounting the blood and guts of the project because they use a menu template. But where's the fud on the white paper, the technicals, the use case?

[Anonymous No.29200968]

>>29200673
well, I'm still holding but yeah I'm about to sell most of my stack. there's no excuse for them to ripoff some shitty .finance template if they're so capable. I would prefer to hold something with less risk of failure and more upside potential. If you end up making it from this congrats.

[Anonymous No.29201038]

>>29200962
>But where's the fud on the white paper, the technicals, the use case?
there is literally no fud on any of that, which is even more of a problem because a team that's capable of pulling that off should have zero trouble whatsoever making an original website

[Anonymous No.29201062]

20k stack here. Small enough that a loss doesn't hurt, big enough that I could make decent gains if this does catch. There's a few defi projects I'm bullish on but not sure if they'll really hit during this cycle. Don't care about muh bleeding sats because it's walking around money anyhow.

[Anonymous No.29201162]

Why does OP care so much about how people lose money? I've been mulling back and forth on this coin and the more I see these threads the more I want to drop 5-10K USD. I don't even care if its a scam I can lose the money I just think OP is a faggot.

[Anonymous No.29201179]

>>29201062
thats fair. I have a 350k stack and I honestly don't have faith in the project anymore. will probably leave 10-20k as well

[Anonymous No.29201209]

>>29197180
me too desu

[Anonymous No.29201374]

>>29199470
I just want it to go over my initial investment. I thought I bought a dip but then it dipped more

[Anonymous No.29201574]

>>29201062
>>29201179
avalanche ama

relax

[Anonymous No.29201617]

>>29196889
Whats will 50x then that you like?

[Anonymous No.29201662]

>>29201574
geyser apy down means a large chunk of people are in the unilp expect a substantial dump at nearly any local or ath peak tho :( you have early vc/ico niggers and big time yield farmers recopping

[Anonymous No.29201918]

>>29201662
apy.vision says there are 45 LP holders for UNN.
the apy for geyser only goes up when the value of UNN goes up.

[Anonymous No.29201925]

>>29196889
>UNN

[Anonymous No.29202137]

>>29201918
It goes down when more people use the geyser

[Anonymous No.29202167]

5m unn here am i fucked?

[Anonymous No.29202284]

Seems kinda solid but whales dump every hour and take the price with them. I sold today

[Anonymous No.29202307]

>>29202137
but there hasn't been a change in LP holders.