/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.28506157]

Link is still over $28, expect a BTC dump any time now.

[Anonymous No.28506253]

aaand there it is

[Anonymous No.28506471]

>>28506253
Not quite yet.

[Anonymous No.28506476]

Reminder to nulinkers to WITHDRAW YOUR LINKIES OFF BINANCE to make manipualtors seethe.

[Anonymous No.28506560]

forming

[Anonymous No.28506744]

>>28506157
here we go

[Anonymous No.28506778]

Theeeeeere it is.

[Anonymous No.28506788]

such a prophecy

[Anonymous No.28506808]

>>28506157

[Anonymous No.28506822]

>>28506476
Nulinkers aren't the problem. It's the midwit 20-40k linkie retards who are keeping their links on fucking binance for "le comfy 5% apy". Then they come here and bitch about the price

There was one retard the other day who was doing this for $16 a day

[Anonymous No.28506900]

>>28506822
how do I get this apy?

[Anonymous No.28506994]

>>28506900
You don't, he's a retard.

[Anonymous No.28507174]

>>28506788
Unironically.

[Anonymous No.28507411]

I keep all my link on coinbase, any way to earn interest or nah?

[Anonymous No.28507492]

not anymore burgerboy

[Anonymous No.28507587]

>>28506157
based and prophetic post

oh wait no this is just life now

[Anonymous No.28507827]

king of the top scam coins, biz is so proud

[Anonymous No.28507879]

>>28507587
Spread the one true word.

[Anonymous No.28508395]

>>28506157
>>28507879
This is just fucking amazing.

[Anonymous No.28508479]

>>28508395
This was yesterday.

[Anonymous No.28508519]

[Anonymous No.28508620]

>>28508519
This was also yesterday.

[Anonymous No.28508635]

unironically these coordinated dumps are making me more bullish that ever on link

[Anonymous No.28508723]

>>28508479
What for?
Whats the endgame?

[Anonymous No.28508738]

This is beyond ridiculous

[Anonymous No.28508802]

Alright guys, give it to me straight. No memes. What is the "cup of coffee" line all about in the whitepaper? I've read it multiple times, and I still can't figure out why the hell they would write that. Are they supressing it for other reasons, or are they supressing it because they really meant that this should be the price of a cup of coffee?

[Anonymous No.28508825]

>>28508723
Who knows.

Back in May 2020, Bitcoin would dump every single time Link went over $4.

[Anonymous No.28508909]

>>28508802
That line was never actually in the wp.

[Anonymous No.28508910]

>>28508802
yes

[Anonymous No.28509017]

Reminder to
Take your link off exchanges
Stop lending your link

[Anonymous No.28509032]

>>28507879
Spread this pic, spam it everywhere.

I did my part: >>28507994

[Anonymous No.28509183]

>>28507879
>>28508479
But every time LINK hits an ATH it's off the back of BTC rising because it isn't making any moves on its own versus BTC. Ofc, large upward moves are usually followed by retracements or corrections for any asset and certainly in crypto. Why read into it that this is purposeful suppression? Why isn't this just BTC moving up a little too fast (in this case essentially pushing towards its ATH), LINK being buoyed versus fiat as a result, then BTC correcting ordinarily, and LINK therefore correcting? The kind of enormous coordinated volume required to do this to BTC purely to suppress LINK which happens to be your particular investment makes your arguments sound really farfetched.

[Anonymous No.28509311]

>>28509183
>But every time LINK hits an ATH it's off the back of BTC rising
lol, maybe you should take a look at the Link/BTC chart since mid-2018.

[Anonymous No.28509448]

guys, its pretty simple: USstocks market opens at 8:30 aka 2 min before OJ posted.
Many investors trading parallel (stocks + crypto). Market dumps when market opens pretty often => the same goes now for crypto.

[Anonymous No.28509523]

>>28509448
No.
They've been dumping BTC to keep Link under $28 for a while now, see >>28508620 >>28508479

[Anonymous No.28509544]

>>28509183
That's bullshit. Link is one of the coins fucked by BTC both on its rise and drops. As long as BTC doesn't act like a retarded it grows in both sats and USD.

In the past days almost every drop of BTC followed after Link started to go up. Saw the same shit at $5 and that was in a fucking bear market.

[Anonymous No.28509640]

>>28509311
Maybe you should focus on the present. I'm talking about recent history. What does 2018 behaviour have to do with what we're seeing clear as day now, in LINK's first bullrun? You've lost the plot.

[Anonymous No.28509703]

>>28509523
The whole market dumped. A few minutes before the stocks market opened. Is that really all about LINK? If you're right I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.28509710]

>>28508825
maybe to create the worlds most insane moonshot? get the attention of all the media which will create an even bigger moonshot? then all other crypto holders will start selling just to get in on the insane link moonshot which will crash every crypto leaving only link. sorry im new to this schizo stuff.

[Anonymous No.28509828]

>>28509640
Cause the same shit happened that is happening now. Every fucking time Link was about to break out BTC took a giant fucking shit. Every single time.

[Anonymous No.28509859]

>>28509703
>The whole market dumped.
Yes. Because they dumped BTC.
Just in time to keep Link under $28 again.

See >>28508620
>>28508479

If you think it's a coincidence that Bitcoin dumps every time Link breaks above $28, then I unironically feel sorry for your delusion.

[Anonymous No.28509951]

>>28509703
Think for yourself. Is it? What do you think? This is just silliness from people who have bet too much on one silent project that had a major bubble and crash a few months ago and isn't even close to achieving fundamental milestones it needs to move forward.

[Anonymous No.28509961]

>>28509640
>What does 2018 behaviour have to do with what we're seeing clear as day now
Link has been heavily outperforming Bitcoin since the summer of 2018.

[Anonymous No.28510063]

>>28509951
>This is just silliness
You are delusional.

Look at the charts, look at the examples posted itt.
EVERY TIME Link has broken above $28 these past days, BTC has dumped.

[Anonymous No.28510131]

linkies dont know btc is 70% of the crypto market its like under one

[Anonymous No.28510137]

>>28509859
>I unironically feel sorry for your delusion.
That's just comedy gold. You're the one with an absurd conspiracy involving coordinated 16bn market moves to suppress your investment because you can't wrap your head around its underperformance. You don't need to resort to this to cope - LINK's obviously a great project.

[Anonymous No.28510282]

Qnt is over 43 and is better than link

[Anonymous No.28510290]

>>28509951
>silent project
>isn't even close to achieving fundamental milestones
how do you know how close they are if they're silent?

[Anonymous No.28510308]

>>28508635
Bullish on a 10 year time scale sure, but can you comprehend what it will be like if they keep doing this at various price points up to 100 and beyond? I'm already finding it difficult to cope at this stage, it might genuinely send me crazy if this goes on for a long time

[Anonymous No.28510364]

EVERYTIME

[Anonymous No.28510435]

>>28510137
Anon.
I predicted the BTC dump with pinpoint accuracy.
Here's another prediction from yesterday: >>28508479

There are a number of other pics showing how BTC dumps every single time Link went over $28.

There are examples of this happening over the past years as well, for weeks on end at times.

You have your head way too far up your ass.
Come back to reality.

[Anonymous No.28510520]

>>28510282
People should rememeber that qnt and link were the same price just a few weeks ago when link was around 12-13. Now look at things

[Anonymous No.28510613]

>>28510520
QNT isn't being suppressed like Link is.

[Anonymous No.28510638]

>>28509951
>a major bubble and crash a few months ago
>up 21,000% during mostly a bear market
>consistently the best performing asset since July 2018
>inb4 hurr durr other shitcoins are outperforming it waaaa
Pic related

[Anonymous No.28510917]

>>28510290
You can answer that a few ways: first is that's irrelevant because as far as the market is concerned that might as well be the case; second is this was fairly evident at smartcon at least from my perspective as well as the fact there are several unachieved hurdles that need to be released or first before staking is achieved.

>>28510435
The irony of you presenting this totally unfounded ridiculous conspiratorial shit involving enormous amounts of money moving around at coordinated intervals just to fuck with specifically you while saying I'm deluded and have my head up my ass appears lost on you. As I said, this "pinpoint accuracy" could be explained by ordinary dynamics of LINK and BTC because LINK isn't making any of its own moves in sats and relies on BTC to increase versus the dollar and little else.

[Anonymous No.28511060]

>>28510638
Weird take considering I didn't whine at all. As I said before, LINK is a great project it's just not doing so well on its own at the moment. You guys are the ones waaaing.

[Anonymous No.28511110]

>>28510917
>totally unfounded ridiculous conspiratorial shit

Anon.
I predicted the BTC dump with pinpoint accuracy.

How did I do that?
Because they have been dumping BTC whenever Link went over $28 for a while now, as shown itt.
And they have done this at other key Link price levels in the past, as shown itt.

You're in denial. Come back to us, come back to reality.

[Anonymous No.28511215]

>>28510917
>this was fairly evident at smartcon
that was 6 months ago. stop making accusations when you clearly don't know shit

[Anonymous No.28511250]

>>28510917
> several unachieved hurdles that need to be released
Name them.
>this was fairly evident at smartcon at least from my perspective
Key word here "your perspective", effectively irrelevant. So what competing product is ahead of Chainlink right now fren?
>LINK isn't making any of its own moves in sats and relies on BTC to increase versus the dollar
Explain what happened here then.
>>28508825

[Anonymous No.28511407]

>>28511060
Stop posting and move on then??? This is a bitch and whine thread obviously?

[Anonymous No.28511420]

>>28510917
>this was fairly evident at smartcon
They didn't mention one thing about how close to or far from releasing any of the expected features they are.
Once again, you are creating a world of imagination without any basis in reality.

>at least from my perspective
Exactly.

[Anonymous No.28512097]

>>28509703

Why do you think LINK was one of only two coins that went up during the two year bear market?

LINK and BNB that’s it. And BNB was basically cheating.

[Anonymous No.28512285]

>>28511110
I can't keep arguing with you but it's a decent conversation so I want to ask how you believe the suppression is taking place? How are these enormous orders being coordinated? At least I respect your faith in LINK.

>>28511215
What the hell am I making accusations about and why are you so triggered? Where is *your* evidence that they are close to releasing staking? You can find all the breadcrumbs you want but I've seen breadcrumb trails lead off nowhere for years because they are just hopeful speculation in the absence of explicit team communication. I'm saying on the balance of evidence and communication of the team staking ain't coming within this bullrun at least. I suspect you just don't want to think about that. If you like, imagine I'd said "for all we know, staking is nowhere close".

>>28511250
I was referring to the ordinary stuff with regard to hurdles (e.g. OCR, t-sigs). On competitors - no one. LINK is clearly ahead of the field but there are plenty of reasons for it to be behaving like this that have nothing to do with suppression. On the snapshot, without a wider picture of those specific dates it's hard to see. I think you want me to explain because I've said BTC usually drags LINK up with it. As we all know, alts make moves against BTC when BTC cools off. You can interpret that snapshot as follows: BTC had increased prior to the snapshots and has already started cooling off, LINK has inflated as a result, BTC corrects after a recent pump (this could be any timeline you like honestly), LINK fails to hold its own versus BTC and dumps versus USDT.

[Anonymous No.28512468]

>>28512285
>how you believe the suppression is taking place?
You can see for yourself: they're selling BTC to make Link go down, either because the dumps are triggering bots or (if large enough) because people themselves are motivated to sell any crypto they have.

[Anonymous No.28513151]

Ok it's above 28 again

[Anonymous No.28514024]

>>28513151
Not for long.

[Anonymous No.28514085]

Btc will dump soon. They can't let link stay above 28.

[Anonymous No.28514225]

Oh god its near $8.50. This dump will ruin crypto!!!!

Its been fun boys see you in 3 years.

[Anonymous No.28514337]

Looks like they're trying to start the dump.

[Anonymous No.28514483]

>>28513151
>>28514024
>>28514085
>>28514225
>>28514337
They might have noticed we noticed.
Maybe they'll dump it again, or maybe they'll just put up a new artificial ceiling at a higher level.

[Anonymous No.28514639]

>>28514483
Fucking kek they're trying hard, look at this shit.

[Anonymous No.28514654]

>>28514483
They don't care about us. They care that it seems like link is worse to normies than xrp and doge.

[Anonymous No.28515374]

>>28514483
Also I'm recording both charts so I can shove it in these trannies dilated pussies who think this is all one big coincidence.

[Anonymous No.28515474]

I sold my linkies for $29.1

I might buy some GRT or reinvest into linkies when it goes back down

[Anonymous No.28515499]

>>28515374
Anyone still thinking this is a coincidence is deluded beyond repair.

[Anonymous No.28515868]

>>28515474
Aaaaaaaaah it's $29.4 now. That's literally a couple hundred difference to when I sold my stack five minutes ago...

[Anonymous No.28516018]

How's that pinpoint accuracy working out for you

[Anonymous No.28516167]

>>28516018
It's because there's an army of autists who have gotten sick of their shit and they're all watching their moves very closely.

[Anonymous No.28516169]

>>28515868
>he sold?
>pomp eet

[Anonymous No.28516494]

>>28516018
lmao, how does this change the fact that I predicted that dump?
If anything, it may have been my thread that opened people's eyes and helped spark this pump.

[Anonymous No.28516777]

>>28516167
>>28514483
Ohhh okay. So it's not that you're wrong, it's that LINK is suppressed by whoever, BTC is manipulated by them too, they've discovered that you 4 people worked it out because they saw this thread, and they've now abandoned it because it stopped being fun. See you at $30, schizos. Step away from the charts for a bit.

[Anonymous No.28516866]

>>28516777
>it's that LINK is suppressed by whoever, BTC is manipulated by them too
What?

[Anonymous No.28516943]

>>28516777
Actually there's over 30 of us.

[Anonymous No.28518028]

>>28516943
Maybe you can pool together $1 each and buy a LINK. Oh wait...

[Anonymous No.28518034]

>>28516943
Not counting the lurkers.