/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.27991619]

how does it feel to hold the worst performing asset in the world linkies?

[Anonymous No.27991672]

i am numb to it now

[Anonymous No.27991673]

>>27991619
I'm not going to sugar coat it, it feels pretty gosh darn bad my friend.

[Anonymous No.27991686]

I feel fine. Keep going, linky, go at your own pace, there's no rush.

:)

[Anonymous No.27991713]

now imagine the strength of a bsv's holders hands

[Anonymous No.27991733]

>>27991672
>>27991673
>>27991686
why the fuck are you still holding? just sell buy something else and you'll most likely buy lower than you can right now as long as sergey keeps dumping every friday

[Anonymous No.27991924]

>>27991733
No.
:)

[Anonymous No.27991927]

>>27991619
It feels good, while everything else is mooning people still can't stop talking about link it really makes you think

[Anonymous No.27991970]

>>27991927
the only people talking about link are regretful bagholders

[Anonymous No.27992037]

Shut the fuck up you disgusting nigger.

[Anonymous No.27992123]

>>27991733
when will it be lower than 18usd. no point fucking up my buy price avg buying expensive

[Anonymous No.27992125]

The team is now dumping over $35,000,000 a week. We blame cz but this is all ending up on uniswap.
100 staff being paid $200,000 each is only $20,000,000. They would have years of wages built up already even after taxes. Why are they still dumping?

[Anonymous No.27992209]

>>27991619
i bet 10 linkies you bought in 2017

[Anonymous No.27992293]

>>27992125
you should know the answer by now
but if you dont, its swapping to ethereum for gas

[Anonymous No.27992430]

>>27991970
No lol the nolinkers are the vast majority making threads how you should sell

[Anonymous No.27992526]

>>27992293
Eth gas station says the chainlink network has only spent $1.53M USD in gas over the last 30 days. The team is currently dumping over 35mil a week.

[Anonymous No.27992608]

>>27991619

[Anonymous No.27992631]

>>27992526
>gas
And how much in node fees?

[Anonymous No.27992785]

>>27992631
Looking at market.link, the node fees over the last 7 days are ~200k link. That's $5mil USD. Add on gas and there's still ~$28mil unaccounted for

[Anonymous No.27992787]

>>27991619
ADA casually pulling off a 2x with a 10b mc while this shit is still crabbing

[Anonymous No.27992800]

>>27991619
Feels pretty shit ngl

[Anonymous No.27992914]

>>27991619
That's not the US dollar though?

[Anonymous No.27992917]

>>27991619
Normiefag here, I feel very comfy, the more I read about Chainlink, the more interested I get.
I'll buy some more at the end of the month. It's a long shot bet and I don't think steadiness is necessarily a bad thing.

[Anonymous No.27993077]

>>27992631
>>27992785
Looking at reputation.link, it states the network has spent ~$12mil worth of eth over the last week and 221k link around 5.5mil. So that's around $17.5mil.

The numbers are starting to add up slowly, when will OCR be rolled out to all feeds?

[Anonymous No.27993084]

>>27992917
some oldfag advice: buy before 16th of February
Do it

[Anonymous No.27993130]

>>27992430
>he thinks they are nolinkers

[Anonymous No.27993205]

>>27991619
Fucking awful. Should I buy more? Down cost average?

[Anonymous No.27993247]

>>27991619
>how does it feel to hold the worst performing asset in the world linkies?
LINK doesn't follow BTC any longer, it will moon when everything else crashes soon. Expect to see it reach new ATH at 45$ before the end of March.

[Anonymous No.27993283]

niggers

[Anonymous No.27993298]

>>27991619
feels really great, thanks for asking.

[Anonymous No.27993313]

>>27993077
But why do you count the 221k link? Isn't this fees paid to node operators? Why should Sergey pay for this? Isn't the whole point of operating a node to get paid in link? Why do you consider it an expense?

[Anonymous No.27993363]

>>27993077
Sergey is running out of time. Nice digits.

[Anonymous No.27993385]

>>27993084
You've got it

[Anonymous No.27993400]

MY LINKIES WILL INHERIT THE EARTH

[Anonymous No.27993418]

>>27991619
NOT GREAT BOB

[Anonymous No.27993440]

10% up last week doing better than bank interest rate for year

[Anonymous No.27993472]

>>27993084
what's happening on feb 16

[Anonymous No.27993513]

Link bros should learn about opportunity cost.
A lot of people get emotionally attached.

[Anonymous No.27993570]

>>27993385
>>27993084
>>27993472
Yes, what happens on the 16th ?

[Anonymous No.27993628]

>>27993077
So they really are running out of money. I never realized running the network for a couple of defi nerd projects could be a netcost of hundreds of millions. This is some pretty potent fud to be honest

[Anonymous No.27993634]

>>27993513
Pretty much this, they couldn't realise their sick gains, and make even more by switching to other coins. Lots of link holders missed out on being millionaires in the last few months

[Anonymous No.27993717]

>>27993628
I know OCR is meant to drop the cost through the floor for running the network and this migration has only just started with maybe 4 feeds running. I'm assuming all will be converted in the very near future.

[Anonymous No.27993771]

>>27991619
Its actually has the only healthy stocklike growth, it doesnt fear me, knowing a radical high would mean a bigger dump. Give me the 15% up followed by a 5% down every month and i’ll be super happy.

The fud at this point is just making me laugh.

Why dont you go fomo into pajeet rubic and fuck off to b for some tranny porn

[Anonymous No.27993780]

>>27993570
>>27993717
as an example of what could happen

[Anonymous No.27993784]

>>27993717
What's OCR? Og linkie here, been out of the loop for a few months

[Anonymous No.27993883]

>>27993570
A LINK flies over everyones house

[Anonymous No.27994047]

>>27993313
Yeah, what's up with that?

[Anonymous No.27994130]

>>27994047
>But Link is heavier than feathers.

[Anonymous No.27994440]

>>27993628
>I never realized running the network for a couple of defi nerd projects could be a netcost of hundreds of millions.
>This is some pretty potent fud to be honest
i feel the same about eth gas prices

[Anonymous No.27994455]

>>27993313
Because Sergey pays for the node runs. Lol, Chainlink has no paying customer!!! It's not a meme when we say vaporware you know

[Anonymous No.27994465]

>>27992785
>in bull market
>expect ETH price to crab
>can’t figure out why you need more in reserve than the current operational costs

[Anonymous No.27994582]

>>27993084
If they pull that shit I’m getting the rings of Saturn tattooed around my gaping asshole. DR;NS

[Anonymous No.27994742]

He mostly likely is going to pay millions again to one of Ari Juels vaporware projects

[Anonymous No.27994756]

>>27994130
>she turn eh wains aginst ye pal aye?

[Anonymous No.27994956]

>bought at 3.50
>now at ~25$

yea i think i did alright. i'll sell if it drops to 18$ but i still made a good profit.

[Anonymous No.27994980]

Smells like like in here

[Anonymous No.27995077]

Two one six... hmmmm number number number....

[Anonymous No.27995434]

>>27995077
did she get the internship?

[Anonymous No.27996068]

>>27991733
>Please please please oh please let me buy back in I’m sorry daddy I’ll never swing again I’m so sorry please

[Anonymous No.27996286]

>>27993077
>So that's around $17.5mil.
Right.
$ 17.5 million in a week just for the network.

That's already about half of the total weekly "dumps".
And then factor in office rent, wage costs, subcontracts, audits, licensing, ... for a software startup in SF and NY.

[Anonymous No.27996324]

>>27993472
>>27993472
216 the name of god

[Anonymous No.27996371]

>>27993313
>Isn't this fees paid to node operators? Why should Sergey pay for this?
Because Sergey is the contract operator.
The contract operator is supposed to pay the nodes.

>Isn't the whole point of operating a node to get paid in link?
Yes. Your point?
Are you under the impression that Sergey is operating the nodes?

[Anonymous No.27996421]

>>27994455
>Because Sergey pays for the node runs
Obviously, he's the contract operator.
That's what the contract operator is supposed to do: pay the nodes.

>Lol, Chainlink has no paying customer!!!
Every single user is a paying customer.

[Anonymous No.27996527]

>>27996371
>>27996421

> Chainlink is the paying customer for Chainlink nodes

Nothing to see here goy, it's all very healthy and normal

[Anonymous No.27996575]

>>27996286
Wait, you're saying they're not dumping enough???

[Anonymous No.27996615]

>>27996527
>Chainlink is the paying customer for Chainlink nodes
lmao, no.

The users (Aave, Synthetix, ...) are the paying customers to the contract operator (Chainlink).
And the contract operator is the paying customer to the nodes.

[Anonymous No.27996848]

>>27991619
>2022
HAHAHA you Link fags are pathetic this coin has been crabbing at $550-600 all week WHY WONT YOU SELL
>stay mad

[Anonymous No.27996883]

Then why did >>27993077 accounted for the link used by Chainlink as an expense? If users are paying in link to use the contract and the contract operator has to pay the nodes in link surely the contract operator nets a positive of link in the process right?

[Anonymous No.27996994]

>>27996883
>If users are paying in link to use the contract
Users probably aren't paying the contract operator in Link. The contract operator is paying the nodes in Link.

[Anonymous No.27997128]

>>27996575
If Chainlink were actually paying for everything with the weekly Link dumps, they probably wouldn't be dumping enough, no.
But don't forget that the Link that goes to the contracts is reimbursed by the users (Aave, Synthetix, ...).

[Anonymous No.27997148]

>>27996994
Well it is even worse then, it means that this process is just diluting the supply of link (Sergey unlocks non circulating link and gets paid in fiat or eth for it, it is akin of selling)

[Anonymous No.27997211]

>>27997148
>it means that this process is just diluting the supply of link
That was the case regardless.

You're clearly struggling to understand a very simple transaction model.

[Anonymous No.27997467]

>>27997211
Well not really if users paid in link Sergey would just have to unlock the differential of links needed to pay node operators (said differential should be negative btw if the pricing is correct and you want the contract operator to make money)

[Anonymous No.27997730]

>>27997467
>if users paid in link
lol, how about if like some rich guy bought all Link for $1k each?? We'd all be rich!!

The whole point is to lower the threshold for using Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.27997923]

>>27997467
Also, we've known for years now that Sergey is unlocking X amount of Link every so often.
Simply seeing him do this means he's "diluting" the supply.
Hence: "That was the case regardless".

This is exactly what he said he'd do before the ICO btw.

[Anonymous No.27998032]

>>27997148
What did you think was going to happen with the 650m tokens the devs hold? Did you think they would keep them forever? Burn them? This is why the dumps don’t really affect the price, everyone who invested and has a 3 digit IQ had priced this in since ICO.

[Anonymous No.27998234]

>>27991619
ERRRRRMMM, Excuse me? Did you just insult Chainlink? THE Chainlink? Listen here you little shit, Chainlionk is the best cryptocurrency in the world and if you shit talk chainlink, then that means youre shit talking my family which i will not stand for. Why dont you do a little turn around and leave this board before i send you a message that you really wont like

[Anonymous No.27998339]

>>27996286
They probably get vc money too

[Anonymous No.27998550]

>>27991733
kek never selling. I dont even care. I am immune to link losses. I just acquire more forever irrationally.

[Anonymous No.27998687]

>>27997730
The whole point of link was to get users to pay in link, I don't understand how this eems normal to you that the token is literally not needed to retrieve data form the aggregator.


>>27998032
That they would do it wisely, with for instance on selling clauses on a certain period. Here, if Sergey makes user pay less than what he is effectively giving in link to node operators then he is decreasing the token price, and also showing flaws in the whole tokenomics model

[Anonymous No.27998833]

>>27998687
>The whole point of link was to get users to pay in link
The point was to pay node operators in Link.

>how this eems normal to you that the token is literally not needed
Either you're a complete retard, or you're just trolling.

[Anonymous No.27998860]

LINK, my favorite stablecoin

[Anonymous No.27998998]

>>27992125
He needs enough funds now to operate for a few years in case there is a crash.
This also means Link will outperform again every other crypto in the following bear market.

[Anonymous No.27999387]

>>27998687

How in the flying fuck would you know that Sergey is making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?

[Anonymous No.27999486]

>>27999387
Because he's not making them pay in link?

[Vitalij No.27999512]

they said to me - we want to see cool nft app
after it they show this rubbish

WTF WRONG WITH YOU, DON’T BEG ME TO BUY THIS SHIT

> I am smart enough to get how this system works - my purse is ready for playcent NFT and tokens and I am not a faggot who will miss ez pump option

[Anonymous No.27999533]

Never selling you fucking kike.

[Anonymous No.27999561]

>>27999486
How does that mean he's making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?

[Anonymous No.27999877]

>>27999561
Then why not ask to be paid in link? Would add to link's utility, wouldn't have to take link off the dev pool(and also create some buy pressure but agreed this should not be a concerned for Chainlink)

[Anonymous No.28000006]

>>27999877
Answer the question: how does that mean he's making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?

>Then why not ask to be paid in link?
Because that would increase the threshold for using Chainlink.
You as a contract operator can go ahead and demand that people pay you in Link, but you'll turn away potential customers.

[Anonymous No.28000088]

What's the catch with Sergey's ring and Saturn, and why do jannies delete the threads? Are we on to something?

[Anonymous No.28000161]

>>28000000

[Anonymous No.28000243]

>>28000006
So you're saying users don't want to buy link? Only contract operators (ie Sergey) are buying link (he's not he's just using the dev pool)

[Anonymous No.28000372]

>>28000243
You still haven't answered the question: how does that mean he's making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?
Explain your absolute logical bankruptcy.

>So you're saying users don't want to buy link? Only contract operators (ie Sergey) are buying link (he's not he's just using the dev pool)
Users want to use whatever product the contract operator is offering.
Making them personally go out and buy Chainlink makes it unnecessarily cumbersome.
The nodes have to be paid in Link, so the contract operator is simply buying Chainlink for them.

[Anonymous No.28000474]

>>28000243
To add to that that means that buy pressure will only come from contract operators paying node operators who would then sell to... Contract operators. You don't see an issue here?

[Anonymous No.28000538]

[Anonymous No.28000637]

>>28000474
>buy pressure will only come from contract operators
Buy pressure comes from users wanting to use Chainlink.

>node operators who would then sell to... Contract operators.
... what?

[Anonymous No.28000675]

>>28000088
its getting really scary. First was Gatekeepers post in January about wild Q1 2021, then this happened 2x today. And many times in the past. Or maybe jannies are laughing their asses off on schizos while in reality it could be really just a BS

[Anonymous No.28000811]

>>27991619

Worst performing? Bought at 0.40 and now it's above 20. Maybe go fuck yourself poor jealous faggot :DDDDD

[Anonymous No.28000860]

>>28000637

>Buy pressure comes from users wanting to use Chainlink.
No the whole point of the discussion is that users don't pay in link, only the contract operator does

>>node operators who would then sell to... Contract operators.
>... what?
Yes, nodes will sell their link at some point, and since only contract operators need link, we'll then they'll sell to them (ok neglecting speculators here)

[Anonymous No.28000892]

[Anonymous No.28001069]

>>28000637
>>28000860
I love this. real discussion going on, reminds me of old times. keep going boys im watching

[Anonymous No.28001081]

>>28000860
You STILL haven't answered the question: how does that mean he's making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?
Explain your absolute logical bankruptcy.

>No the whole point of the discussion is that users don't pay in link
The users pay for the Link used by the contract operator to pay the nodes.

>Yes, nodes will sell their link at some point, and since only contract operators need link, we'll then they'll sell to them
Firstly: there's nothing wrong with this.
Secondly: the user and the contract operator will be the same person in a lot of cases. Third parties will offer ready-made contracts that users can implement themselves with a few clicks.

[Anonymous No.28001973]

>>27991619
In jan. 2020 link was the absolute top performing asset in the entire world. No asset you could possibly have outperformed it. We will see that type of performance again with link.

[Anonymous No.28002556]

>>28001973
Stfu no we won’t. Are you reading the above link is fucking with us and fucking up the tokenomics.

[Anonymous No.28002628]

It aint as bad as Ethereum ill tell you that, at least your tech is praised. ETH sucks both in price movement and in tech. ETH is massively overated

[Anonymous No.28002676]

>>28002556
fuck off little bitch

[Anonymous No.28002804]

>>28002628

LOL kys pajeet

[Anonymous No.28003097]

>>28002556
>Are you reading the above
Yes.
And apparently everyone fudding Link’s tokenomics is a complete retard.

[Anonymous No.28003239]

>>28003097
Suuuuuirre haha. The writing is on the wall its going back down to 30k sats, look at the chart you know you can see it, it’s obvious

[Anonymous No.28003267]

I'm quite greatful that Linkies have sacrified alt season so that the rest of us can play it. If Linkies were all in alt szn too the forces of reflexivity would create more competition and less opportunity for gains for the rest of us.

Thank you Linkies for making this sacrifice for the rest of us. Enjoy hodling - the meme that keeps on giving :)

[Anonymous No.28003309]

>>28003239

AHAHAH jellyboi pissed that you missed out on epic gains, hahahah fuck off beggar bum :D

[Anonymous No.28003362]

>>28001973
Haha that was 13 months ago, what have been the best performing assets for each of those 13 months and why have you not been investing in them?

You didn't buy into the narrative did you anon? You've not married another coin have you? Noooooooooooo

[Anonymous No.28003413]

>>28001081

>The users pay for the Link used by the contract operator to pay the nodes.
Ok, but inderictly right? User pays in fiat ->contract operator pays in link->node operator receives link

What if the contract operator hoarded link be fore and can ask for a low ball price for his service?
>>Yes, nodes will sell their link at some point, and since only contract operators need link
>Firstly: there's nothing wrong with this.
I would disagree, this is a closed system with few participants
>Secondly: the user and the contract operator will be the same person in a lot of cases. Third parties will offer ready-made contracts that users can implement themselves with a few clicks.
Okay, this would make more sense

[Anonymous No.28003427]

>>28002556
I bet youre the same fag who always posts "wen steaking".

[Anonymous No.28003442]

>>28003239
Every argument they make is from complete ignorance.

[Anonymous No.28003483]

>>27991619
We will be the ones laughing after this bull run

Best performing coin in bear market

[Anonymous No.28003499]

>>27991619
No idea, ask XRP holders.

[Anonymous No.28003525]

>>28001081
>>>28000860 (You)
>You STILL haven't answered the question: how does that mean he's making users pay less than he is giving to node operators?
Yeah right I can't know for sure, I just suspect it since Sergey is trying to createe incentive

[Anonymous No.28003601]

>>28003413
>What if the contract operator hoarded link be fore and can ask for a low ball price for his service?
Why would someone low-ball their own price lmao

>I would disagree, this is a closed system with few participants
Few participants?
Chainlink is still in its absolute most basic form, and already there are many dozens of users (with each many thousands of users of their own), and Chainlink backs something like $10 billion in Defi.

>>28003525
>I can't know for sure
No, you can't.

[Anonymous No.28003657]

>>28003499
Checked and kekd

[Anonymous No.28003682]

>>27992125
So they have long term runway to keep operating at full steam unlike every other project

[Anonymous No.28003766]

>>27991619
Maybe for you
I've never stopped buying

[Anonymous No.28003791]

>>27991619
i actually just looked at my portfolio and my link has dropped THE LEAST out of everything. we have a nice trajectory. slow and steady wins the race. zoom out and log scale, faggot. someone posted the pic as fud, but i actually love it so im posting it myself as not fud.

[Anonymous No.28003920]

>>27995077

Criminally unchecked.

[Anonymous No.28003939]

>>28003791
This has to be ironic FUD meme

Its actually decent

[Anonymous No.28004036]

>>28003601

>Why would someone low-ball their own price lmao
To bypass competition. This is how big corps prey in small businesses

>Few participants?
>Chainlink is still in its absolute most basic form, and already there are many dozens of users (with each many thousands of users of their own), and Chainlink backs something like $10 billion in Defi.
If as you said users become contract operators, okay fine. But if not, contract operators will also be node operators, and the tokenomics are then fucked.

[Anonymous No.28004177]

>>28004036
>To bypass competition. This is how big corps prey in small businesses
Well if they do that, then good on them lol.

>But if not, contract operators will also be node operators
Even in that case, the tokenomics make perfect sense.

And you're supposed to use a number of independent nodes.

[Anonymous No.28004278]

>>27994742
Since Ari was too lazy to develop a new oracle solution with his ic3 high school students this year, Sergey is acquiring Ari's screenplay adaptation of his own novel Tetrakys, they're partnering with Netflix for the production, they're still negotiating the final terms of the deal but this will all be unveiled at SmartCon. It's being pitched as 'the Bourne identity meets da Vinci code'. Rumors on the private discord is that Sergey plans on directing it himself and will step down as CEO of Chainlink Labs to focus on his filmmaking career.

[Anonymous No.28004636]

>>28004177
Okay, I think we've reached a point where our disagreement is based on conjectures of how actors will use the network, so hard to know. To wrap up, my concern comes from aggregator not being paid in link. I understand that this eases adoption as users don't need to buy link, but I am worried this would lead to a concentration of link users being only very specialised actors that know how to handle link contracts/operate nodes. If the network becomes decentralised enough in that these actors are multiple enough and are in competition, then fine. It is my hope that it will be the case, but we'll see

[Anonymous No.28004913]

>>28004636
>I am worried this would lead to a concentration of link users being only very specialised actors that know how to handle link contracts/operate nodes
Right now there is only one contract operator, which is basically the "worst" incarnation of this situation you're worried about; yet things are running just fine.
The users pay Chainlink, and Chainlink pays the node operators.

[Anonymous No.28004997]

>>28003309
Bitch i hold way more link than your ass

[Anonymous No.28005007]

>>27991619
Comfy as fuck.

In hindsight it's always easy to say "well I should have swinged and would have made so much money", but you never know that beforehand. The risk is just not worth it. With LINK I just know I'm gonna make it and it feels great, no stress, no worries.

$1000 EOY checkem

[Anonymous No.28005100]

>>27998550
based

[Anonymous No.28005384]

>>28004913
> things are running just fine
We do not know if Chainlink is making profit as a contract operator. But yeah in terms of product, the network is delivering an awesome product

[Anonymous No.28005536]

>>28005384
>We do not know if Chainlink is making profit as a contract operator.
Well it's obviously in high demand.

Defi is one of the hottest new industries in finance, and Chainlink is the absolute best oracle in Defi.

[Anonymous No.28005906]

>>28004997
hahahaha sure you do bitch boy, crawl back to your momma's basement

[Anonymous No.28006147]

>>28005906
Hahahaha you had 3 years. You’re not even. In the top 50% of wallets. Think about that normies came in 2 years later than you and are doing laps on your ass.

[Anonymous No.28006224]

>>27991619
waiting for $100 eoy or next years eoy

[Anonymous No.28006239]

NEVER SELLING

[Anonymous No.28006296]

>>27993784
Threshold signatures ~= offchain reporting (OCR)

Re-read the blog post about it.

[Anonymous No.28006545]

Is it too late for LINK? Does it have much further to climb or is it a $25 stablecoin now

[Anonymous No.28006675]

>>28006545
It’s done it’s going to bleed now back to 35k sat over the next few months all these idiots here know it too. Literal nothing happening for a few months. They promised arbitum and oracle and staking but they are way way behind

[Anonymous No.28006769]

>>28006147
no idea what the fuck you're even trying to say, I did 50x with link while you were fucking around with doge and other scam coins and pajeeting around this fucking joke board

now go ask your momma for some change and buy link before you miss out again you little imbecil

[Anonymous No.28006828]

>>27991619
I don't even check. I'm up 3000%.

[Anonymous No.28006890]

>>28006769
Idiot I went 120x sitting on 1.2M you’re nothing show us your folio don’t be an idiot.

[Anonymous No.28007069]

>>28006545
well it's gonna be around $1000 end of year, guaranteed, so you decide

[Anonymous No.28007163]

>>28006890
you have nothing little bitch, now go back to flipping burgers you poor bum

[Anonymous No.28007524]

>>28006675
absolutely. staking is so clearly out of the short-term picture that it's practically irrelevant whatever the market is doing. that's why any upward price movement has been wimpy. link is just barely clinging to the momentum of the market.

if i got anything out of the hot air fest that was smartcon it's that working out staking for more complex SCs is nowhere near close to being rolled out.

t. realist and demoralised OG

[Anonymous No.28007533]

>>27991619
Why are you watching a coin so closely if you don't own it? Is it because you're seething that you missed out on the most obvious 100x of the last 3 years? And now trying to complain that it's outperformed by P&Ds over a 1 week timeline? If you had a suicide stack you wouldn't be feeling this need to kill yourself

[Anonymous No.28007878]

>>28007163
Hahahah you had 3 years still can’t man up. I hold way way more link than you

[Anonymous No.28008110]

>>28007524
Exactly this it might be 1 year might even be 2 years for staking possible it’s 2025. Eventually people will abandon link is it doesn’t step up. I predict that will be June time that we’ll see a major defections of nothing comes. Truthfully it could be this month if truly there isn’t shit

[Anonymous No.28008114]

>>28007524
>newfag posting
>r*dditspacing
>literally retarded
It all adds up

[Anonymous No.28008357]

Look how tightly it’s following eth and other top 10s. Has 0 mind of its own. Who the hell is left to buy this shit anyway? Anyone that understands and knows link is already in it. Normies aren’t going to have an epiphany all of a sudden and flood in. They’ll never understand what link is. I fucking couldn’t believe mark Cuban named aave, sushi, eth, btc, ltc and didn’t even fucking mention link.

[Anonymous No.28008535]

>>28008357
>Who the hell is left to buy this shit anyway?
Link still has to release any of the long-awaited features foretold in the white paper that will finally make all the major use cases available.
No coin has as much upside in the near future as Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.28008797]

>>27991619
Rent free

[Anonymous No.28008819]

>>28008114
man fuck off with this weak shit. did you attend smartcon? i watched it all and it was disappointing as fuck. i've held since very early '18. any time someone posts any kind of legit concern or questions the fact that chainlink does not seem to have broken the back of key technical issues with the project it triggers you people to the degree you have to resort to this kind of dumb shit while offering no insight whatsoever. it's pure insecurity and fear showing on your part.

here's some more spacing for you you fuckin dumbass.

[Anonymous No.28009333]

>>28008819
Agree smartcon was crazy Bc a bunch of projects showed up to promote themselves and hardly had any understanding what Chainlink was or Ahmad no integration at all. It was free publicity for those projects.

[Anonymous No.28009439]

>>28008819
Remember that fucker from Arbol. Literally nothing happened w Arbol probably has 0 customers.

[Anonymous No.28009545]

My dream during my NEET days was to accumulate over 1k linkies back in 2018 but now that I have a job, it went over 20 bucks and it won't budge at all

I'm on GRT and ADA hoping it would grow just like LINK

[Anonymous No.28009634]

>Any day now marines!

[Anonymous No.28009677]

>>28009439
nothing pissed me off more than listening to the absolute mongoloids in the chat getting excited about that bullshit. we've obviously missed the boat in this cycle to make serious moves we all know were possible for chainlink if they had been able to sort staking out. who knows when we get the next one. staking seems pie in the sky to me at this point frankly. it's weird, people say 2018 was harder. meh. not for me. this was the opportunity. the lights are green and we aren't moving.

[Anonymous No.28009729]

i hold 30k linkies
when do i sell?
never
when do i stake?
q1 2021

[Anonymous No.28010024]

>>28006675
>They promised arbitum and oracle and staking but they are way way behind
this is one of the defining features of the bipolar, revenge-drunk ex-link holders spamming biz lately - they're under the delusion that the chainlink team put out a roadmap for these features and have fallen behind. in reality you're just conflating speculation about releases you read on biz with sergey himself setting dates. you're all so vindictive and hopelessly confused about the most elementary aspects of this project, monomaniacally obsessed with short term opportunity cost because some literally who shitcoin of the week did a 5x out of nowhere.
if you're still holding for whatever reason, please for the love of god, just sell.

[Anonymous No.28010113]

>>28006675
>They promised arbitum and oracle and staking but they are way way behind
They never set a deadline for these things, ever.

[Anonymous No.28010145]

>>28007878

you're a poor bitch compared to me, in fact you shouldn't even be talking to me without first asking for permission, you little rat fuck

now go get me a beer and then blow me bitch

[Anonymous No.28010293]

>>27996848
>LINK has been crabbing at $550-600 all week
ty based time traveler

[Anonymous No.28010376]

>>28009545
Bro 1k linkies was like 200-300 bucks

[Anonymous No.28010427]

>>27991619
>500% in a year is the worst performance asset

[Anonymous No.28010543]

>>28010145
Hahahahaha I have 46k link and you have what like 4k? Hahahahhaah

[Anonymous No.28010599]

>>28010543
Nice proof, bro.

[Anonymous No.28010607]

>>28009677
if you arent just randomly fuding, you should kys
or better yet sell, then kys

[Anonymous No.28010637]

>>28000892
I don’t think this chart is real. Santiment charts to not corroborate.

[Anonymous No.28010679]

>>28009677
The chats were super cringe tier like so bad. Team could have harnessed that energy and done something instead we’re still sitting on price feeds a and nothing else interesting

[Anonymous No.28010697]

what does sir gay do all day? this is ridiculous

[Anonymous No.28010745]

>>28010607
cool thanks for that usual quality standard of response with regard to the literal dead nothingness as far as staking progress is concerned. i do realise you saying that is you just projecting your own insecurity that i'm right back onto me, but i am curious what bullshit you're telling yourself to keep believing staking is around the corner at this point. fuck you.

[Anonymous No.28011135]

>>28010745
i'm not convinced they tell themselves anything beyond what they posted. it's a reflexive self soothing mechanism

[Anonymous No.28011140]

>>28010697
Literally jack shit it seems. They’re probably all making excuses to each other living in an echo chamber.

[Anonymous No.28011195]

>>28010745
are you actually retarded? Your comments about staking not coming out for another 1-2 years are equally dumb as if I were to say staking is 100% coming out tommorow

[Anonymous No.28011331]

>>28011135
it's all they ever offer. "redditspacing!" "kys!" "obviously a newfag!" it's like parroted nonsense, reflexive as you say, and so obviously manifestations of their own doubt in the project and even more obviously projection when they tell me to sell.

[Anonymous No.28011629]

>>28011195
well that's simply a false equivalance and makes no sense. on what deluded 42-level astrological schizoid basis are you positioning this certainty that staking is happening this year? are you honestly one of these 216 guys? you have fuckin nothing and you know it. i'm at least basing my suppositions on observations of team activity, smartcon, etc. yours are based on wishful thinking.

[Anonymous No.28011645]

>>28010024
Is that real?

[Anonymous No.28011968]

>>28011629
what team activity are you following? They are one of the most active on github and hiring alot. I would definetly conclude they are gearing up for a big staking launch from that info. When did you ever know beforehand they were releasing something big? I bet you were also one of those "mainnet for sure not before 2022" people. Now you just moved the goalpost to staking

[Anonymous No.28011999]

>>27991619
>Spend more than 3 years resisting powerful fud at early stages
>Now that it is guaranteed to keep going up, OP thinks I will sell because of some degenerate weak fud

[Anonymous No.28012000]

>>27991619
I bought at 1$. Why would dump it after its done a 20x+. We are unironnically going to 100$ eonm

[Anonymous No.28012081]

>>28011999
The only FUD that gets to me is the weekly 1.5 MIL dumps. At this rate we'll have 650 MIL circulation in a few years

[Anonymous No.28012245]

>>28010543

nice proof retard, I'm richer than you so fuck off bitch

[Anonymous No.28012357]

>>28011968
mainnet is not on the same level as staking and you know it. you're just an apologist prettying up the fact that we are 10% of what we could be now if A) the team had made legitimate progress on staking B) had the remotest balls to give insight on that progress to the market. if you think link doesn't need the market to be euphoric to get up to those astronomical vals you are crazy. ask yourself how much longer you have left in you before what i'm saying starts to resonate a bit then ask yourself if that timeline is totally unrealistic.

[Anonymous No.28012373]

I hope grt will be the next link but what's to stop me from using a lot of those funds to gdt into the next scheme?

[Anonymous No.28012441]

>>27991733
I'm happy with my 1000% return, thanks.

[Anonymous No.28012483]

>>28011968
see
>>28009634

[Anonymous No.28012493]

>>28001973
Kek that mural is at Roosevelt and 1st st in Phoenix. Been by it a hundred times and never noticed that links were exploding out of the guy's head.

[Anonymous No.28012544]

>>28004997
btc, eth , ltc, link

baste portfolio

[Anonymous No.28012585]

>>28012245
Hahahah hasn’t posted a single thing.

[Anonymous No.28012699]

>>28012357
You started fuding first so ok, show proof that there is no legitimate progress on staking. And no, silence from the team doesn't count because they haven't spoken about time estimates for launching anything since they started 3 or so years ago. And don't worry about me, I already 100x my investment.

[Anonymous No.28012878]

>>28012699
> prove a negative
yeah okay anon i'm totally the retard in this equation

[Anonymous No.28013140]

>>28011629
Nice id lmao

[Anonymous No.28013802]

>>27991733
I have thousands that I bought at $2

You can eat the turd from my ass

[Anonymous No.28014017]

>>28010543
too bad you can't cash out.

[Anonymous No.28014879]

>>28013802
Thousands. Like 2k? Time to sell