/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.27384651]

buy the real bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27384699]

>>27380894

[Anonymous No.27385023]

>>27384651
the real shit, the really shitty version of bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27385167]

>>27385023
cope

[Anonymous No.27385686]

>>27384651
theres still people believing in this.
fascinating.

[Anonymous No.27385689]

>>27384651
this was delusional even when ChainLink was below 1 dollar, literally most scam project i know, even fukin Bitconnect that already scammed is more perspective than this bsv shit

[Anonymous No.27385825]

>>27384651
i got 300 and waiting for it to fall below .005 so i can convert 1 btc into 200 bsv then i will have 500

[Anonymous No.27386140]

>>27384651
When people say BSV is Bitcoin it makes me think of the “That’s a man” posters

[Anonymous No.27386380]

>>27386140
bsv is the real bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27386451]

>>27385023
LMFAO.
Are you fucking high.
Can you midwit brain understand this ?
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/block/635141

[Anonymous No.27388039]

Even Elon Musk know Bitcoin is Broken
>Are such large transactions even possible?
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1340678358456274948

"Monster blocks on BSV the real Bitcoin in the last several hours: 127MB block mined by unknown, 203MB block mined by taal, 255MB block mined by taal: That is the 5th largest block of all time!"
https://twitter.com/cryptorebel_SV/status/1355444362356924417

"ViaBTC mined a 4.7 MB BCH block with almost 15k transactions"
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/block/672532


That's peer-to-peer digital cash
BTC has a maximum of 7 transactions per second.
BSV the real Bitcoin has 9,00o now

Transaction fees ? 1.5 SAT
0 confirmations needed....

Just like Sathosi said.

[Anonymous No.27388237]

>>27385686
only delusional heavy bagholders

[Anonymous No.27388432]

>>27388237
corecuck you will be sorry

[Anonymous No.27388679]

>>27388039
yyyyyyyyy, cope hard
thats why BTC is 30 k + and bsv sub 200.
without calvin on the board its literally on the way sub 50 dollarinos.

[Anonymous No.27388732]

>>27388237
corecuck you will be sorry

[Anonymous No.27389104]

>>27388679
Cool BTC can be 5 million. It's still not Bitcoin.
Have you even read Satoshi's whitepaper ?

Peer-to-Peer Digital Cash, with ZERO third Parties and fees MUCH lower than 1%
That's not BTC. That's BSV.

On top of that if you read all of Satoshi's posts on Bitcoin block he wanted Bigger Blocks when they were needed AND 0 confirmations.

So stop calling BTC bitcoin. It's not.
Call it Store of Value coin, or Digital Gold coin.
It's not digital cash and it's centralized as fuck.
Any layer solution wlil require KYC rules because it's a transaction.

[Anonymous No.27389140]

>>27388732
so funny csw will win

[Anonymous No.27389635]

>>27389140
He is going to win so fucking hard and people have no clue.
I sent some BSV to a friend today. I said to him on the phone. Wait a minute and it'll be there, he stopped me. It's here.

BTC devs fucked the world. We could be using decentralized instant cash now.
but NO They have to keep a 1mb Block size and 3-4 transactions per second.
The fees at 100k are going to be INSANE.

ON BSV they go down. They are at 1.5 Sat right now.
That is less than a penny to move a VIDEO on chain.
Are you on Twetch. Incredible. Twitter on the blockchain right now.
Videos on the Blockchain, right now. Podcast 100s of them on the Blockchain right now!

BSV is nothing short of a revolution.

[Anonymous No.27389756]

>>27389635
please i just want price to moon. i dont care about any of that. i just want 10k/bsv and im gucci

[Anonymous No.27389827]

There are even MANY games and a first person shooter on the blockchain right now with people playing. Know what does to the network ? ZERO, nothing..

[Anonymous No.27389879]

>>27389104

I will not argue with CSW cultist, I already gave it up few years ago, mass adoption, store of value BTC 1, BSV 0, GL with your bags

[Anonymous No.27389890]

>>27389756
Bitcoin was meant to change the world. Not make some people rich.

[Anonymous No.27390162]

>>27389635
>He is going to win so fucking hard and people have no clue.

[Anonymous No.27390240]

>>27389879
>store of value
Show me "store of value" In this
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
It's not there. Who the fuck cares if you get rich. This was a way to change the planet, not get you a fucking lambo. Mass adoption. Are you high ?
Half of Africa is using Waves. You are clueless.

On top of that the Powers that Be OWN bitcoin. I mean they own the network 100%

I don't have ANY bags. NONE. All of my BSV came FREE.

[Anonymous No.27390359]

>>27386451
what makes you think bitcoin core wont at some point increase block size? lmao, miners will adapt if the threats grow too big and vote with their power for bigger blocks. hopefully after the next bullrun during a bear market.

[Anonymous No.27390564]

>>27384651
i've been buying monero all year, what do you mean?

[Anonymous No.27390703]

>>27389890
does it look like i care? i want to be rich

[Anonymous No.27390780]

>>27384651
>Founded by a felon Canadian billionaire and an a literally autistic fraudster.

The real Bitcoin, everyone

[Anonymous No.27390885]

>>27390359
>what makes you think bitcoin core wont at some point increase block size? l
Because Blockstream will lose control if they do that. Blockstream is owned by the 2nd largest company on Planet earth.
The entire idea of Segwit was to centralize Bitcoin. The miners have to trust the witness.

[Anonymous No.27390897]

I prefer my BTC with Chinese miners, chinese USDT holders, and chinese whales THANK YOU VERY MUCH

[Anonymous No.27390960]

>>27390703
Who cares

[Anonymous No.27391033]

>>27390897
Read this... People have no clue.
HOUSE OF CARDS

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@adambalm/the-truth-about-who-is-behind-blockstream-and-segwit-as-the-saying-goes-follow-the-money

[Anonymous No.27391049]

>>27390897
b-but what about world changing tech ?

[Anonymous No.27391131]

>>27390885
FUD. As soon as they see the threat coming, it will be implemented.

[Anonymous No.27391158]

>>27390960
honestly what csw wants is a pipe dream. there isnt any chance in hell you're oging to have every country on earth using one currency. its not gonna happen. at this point he just needs to btfo all doubters b signing so my bags can pump and i can get out

[Anonymous No.27391277]

>>27384651
i only buy real bitcoins but you know which one is the real and which is the counterfeit by the price. if you buy under $30k it's fake shit.

[Anonymous No.27391340]

>>27390564
TRUE

[Anonymous No.27391505]

>>27389104
>0 confirmations
that's bulslhit and an outright lie. satoshi said that only if you can easily reverse the purchase you should accept a 0-conf. only if it can't be abused. he never said it was safe otherwise.

[Anonymous No.27391537]

>>27391277
b-but what about world changing tech ???

[Anonymous No.27391601]

Stop telling everyone, I still gotta buy more

[Anonymous No.27391642]

>>27391131
It won't
They have their solution
Small Blocks Lightning network and Schnorr Signatures

[Anonymous No.27391679]

>>27389104
>So stop calling BTC bitcoin. It's not.
you are pretty much alone on this planet with that opinion. there is like 500 other lunatics and that's it. rest of mankind knows btc is bitcoin. we have more flat earthers than cashies... let that sink in! you are the idiots of idiots.

[Anonymous No.27391792]

>>27391505
>that's bulslhit and an outright lie. satoshi said that only if you can easily reverse the purchase you should accept a 0-conf. only if it can't be abused. he never said it was safe otherwise.
Nope you are wrong
I'll let you quote were he said that before I slay your BS.

[Anonymous No.27391918]

>>27389104
pills: not taken
thank me for reminder /pol schizo

[Anonymous No.27391952]

>>27391537
what about it? bitcoin already transformed my life more than anything else. don't really need more revolution. once you are wealthy you are invested in the status quo.

[Anonymous No.27391955]

>>27391679
Grwoing everyday and REALLY alot faster than you know.
You see the whole argument came in 2018 with the "Big-Blocks" would destroy Bitcoin and was 1000% untenable....

Guess who was wrong, Craig Wright or Blockstream

[Anonymous No.27392063]

>>27391918
Not an argument and you can't refute one thing I said.
You can name call.

[Anonymous No.27392091]

>>27391792

[Anonymous No.27392106]

>>27391952
(((((irony)))))

[Anonymous No.27392162]

>>27389104
csw go neck yourself please, go back to prison

[Anonymous No.27392240]

>>27391955
>Grwoing everyday
thankfully that's bullshit. your idiotic fanbase is shrinking since 2018.

[Anonymous No.27392291]

>>27392091
and then he went on to say this.
>It can be phased in, like:
>
>if (blocknumber > 115000)
> maxblocksize = largerlimit

>It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
> When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade.

> Satoshi Nakamoto, on bitcointalk.org, October 04, 2010, 07:48:40 PM

You do know that you can do 0 confirmations on BSV right ?

[Anonymous No.27392478]

I have 15 am I gonna make it into the big leagues?

[Anonymous No.27392513]

>>27392291
>You do know that you can do 0 confirmations on BSV right ?
you can't even accept confirmed transactions on sv because the network security is nonexistent. at least i wouldn't you idiots do whatever you want.

[Anonymous No.27392746]

>>27392162
>>27392240
9,000 transactions per second and 350MB blocks today. It's already here.
There won't be a choice soon between faster than Visa transaction and huge date or. 3-4 transactions per second and 1mb blck sizes. Bitcoin can't scale at all unless it breaks the second sentence of the white paper.

You guys will see very soon.

On January 21st a transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

It came from England...

[Anonymous No.27392848]

>Magnus Granath (aka Twitter user Hodlonaut) has paid Dr. Craig Wright another £140,000, CoinGeek has learned. The amount concerns Wright’s ongoing defamation case against Granath and brings the total amount received by Wright in the case to £210,000.
This is fake

[Anonymous No.27392859]

>>27392513
>because the network security is nonexistent
Show us an example of this. Total hog-wash

[Anonymous No.27393009]

>>27391955
>Grwoing everyday and REALLY alot faster than you know.
You’re a liar.

[Anonymous No.27393124]

>>27392848
https://coingeek.com/hodlonaut-pays-up-the-bill-is-growing-for-craig-wright-detractors/

[Anonymous No.27393171]

bros Im a die hard BSVtard but my biggest concern is what if the markets are just too retarded to ever understand BSV. is Creg really gonna nuke BTC or is it just show? I have no idea whats going on anymore desu this is clown world after all so I keep hodling 1 BTC just to be safe rest is in BSV

[Anonymous No.27393200]

>>27393124
>Source: Coingeek
Yes, this is fake.

[Anonymous No.27393201]

>>27392859
>9,000 transactions per second and 350MB blocks today
full of spam
also lol at the double spend bullshit. you don't know what a real double send is but my guess is you are about to learn it.

[Anonymous No.27393306]

>>27393009
Nothing but a god damn liar.

[Anonymous No.27393313]

>>27392746

[Anonymous No.27393345]

>>27393201
transaction is a transaction nonetheless

[Anonymous No.27393348]

>>27393009
Now shows us the number of transactions.
https://coin.dance/

[Anonymous No.27393378]

>>27393200
could be real you have to be a colossal idiot to lose a libel case if anyone can do it it's craig tho.

[Anonymous No.27393539]

creg hacked and uploaded whitepaper here
https://www.kowr.gov.pl/pobierz-plik/410708

[Anonymous No.27393595]

>>27393345
no it's not. absolutely not.
bitcoin has pretty good transaaction finality on 2 confirmations and ironclad finality on 6 confirmations.

sv has no transaction finality whatsoever theoretically but it's rather unlikely to get a deeper reorg than a 100. probably would cause a chainsplit or a hardfork total shitshow.

[Anonymous No.27393679]

timestamp server will be his demise

[Anonymous No.27393803]

>>27393348
i look at the transacted value over tx count it's more telling of adoption than shitty weather spam. and the trends are clear.

[Anonymous No.27393807]

>>27393595
>sv has no transaction finality
WTF does that even mean lol

[Anonymous No.27393876]

>>27393803
>i look at the transacted value over tx count
Define value

[Anonymous No.27394152]

>>27393876
usd value transacted daily or average transaction value. whichever is currently worse for you.

[Anonymous No.27394157]

>>27393171
same brother

[Anonymous No.27394212]

>>27394152
Thats not the value of Bitcoin. Read the white paper.

[Anonymous No.27394228]

>>27393595
it's all about purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash that would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution

[Anonymous No.27394290]

>>27393807
it means that anyone who mines bitcoin can rewrite history on the sv blockchain to any depth he chooses.

[Anonymous No.27394400]

>>27393348
Turns out ~80% of all BSV’s transactions belonged to one entity.

[Anonymous No.27394421]

>>27394228
you dun fucked up with that tho. should have changed the pow function to at least have some pretense at a functional coin.

[Anonymous No.27394660]

>>27394228
OR ANY third party

So no segwit or lightning or scnhorr
Segwith - Extreme centralization
Lightining - 100% Third party and OFF CHAIN. So much so that it will require KYC
Schnorr - Makes Bitcoin a obfuscation and the IRS won't play ball
https://coingeek.com/irs-targets-privacy-coins-lightning-network-and-schnorr-signatures/

[Anonymous No.27394675]

>>27394421
it's the first sentence of the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.27394756]

>>27394290
That is ridiculous. It POW just like the original protocol. Tell us how this is achieved.

[Anonymous No.27394849]

it's interesting to note that bch is actually working on mitigating it's early missteps.
they gave up on the 0-conf faith based pre-consensus retardation and looking to adopt avalanche as a pos pre-consensus algo. which is at least interesting as a concept.
then it also allows bch to transform itself to a hybrid mined coin from pure pow and this in theory makes it possible to be reorg and also chain split resistant even with a minority hash.

but one can ask what is the point in keeping pow at that point? or bch as there are dozens of other shitcoins doing avalanche... so many questions. but sv cucks remain ignorant and retarded.

[Anonymous No.27395088]

>>27394675
who cares about the whitepaper? the whitepaper was never bitcoin. and more than a dozen shitcoins adhered to the whitepaper closer than bitcoin. it's not a bar to jump over.

bitcoin is the original consensus started by satoshi nakamoto. it's only alive on the btc chain. and that is an undisputeable fact. since the nakamoto consensus can be validated by software and does not require a philosophy degree to debate what it is and what it is not.

[Anonymous No.27395109]

>>27395088
oh, ok

[Anonymous No.27395146]

>>27394400
Are you dumb ?
You know what starting happening then ? Massive amounts of +150 MB blocks.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/block/672532

https://coin.dance/blocks/transactions

[Anonymous No.27395207]

>>27394756
>It POW just like the original protocol.
exactly you are on the right track m8. keep thinking keep those cogs spinning!

[Anonymous No.27395339]

Yawn

[Anonymous No.27395359]

>>27395207
the whitepaper was never bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27395536]

>>27395359
nope it's like a childrens picture book about the adventures of a car compared to the full technical and service specification and working prototype of a car that is bitcoin in actual.

[Anonymous No.27395675]

>>27395536
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/whitepaper.asp
>'to promote or highlight the features of a solution, product, or service that it offers or plans to offer'

[Anonymous No.27395689]

>>27395207

[Anonymous No.27395738]

>>27395146
Congrats, now add data storage costs to the equation.
How in THE FUCK does your ledger stay decentralized when it’s going to cost millions/billions to manage it?

[Anonymous No.27395772]

>>27384651
gambling companies are gonna be on bsv

[Anonymous No.27395800]

>>27395088
You can change what ever you like. If you change the Protocal, it's not bitcoin
That simple.

[Anonymous No.27395851]

>>27395675
yes you can consider it a promo material about a car too if you don't like picture books.

satoshi released the bitcoin codebase and a very specific implementation of the protocol. it doesn't transfer to other chains or coins like the whitepaper which is not even close to being specific.

[Anonymous No.27395948]

>>27395738
Oh Shit! I'll have to buy a 4TB drive . OH SHIT!!!!!!!!
The miners have become billionaires off this. They can by some data retention solutions.

[Anonymous No.27395988]

>>27395689
sorry you are too retarded... lemme give you a hint: the nakamoto consensus requires the majority of the hashrate to participate in good faith. if it doen't it can not function as designed. satoshi never intended for minority hash shitforks to survive.

[Anonymous No.27396005]

>>27395851
anon, my health data is already on bsv blockchain
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bruce-roberts-63b79b23

[Anonymous No.27396025]

>>27395948
#DeathToAllBSVers

[Anonymous No.27396083]

>>27384651
already did 6 years ago

[Anonymous No.27396098]

>>27395800
EXACTLY! which is why no cash fork has a right tor the name bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.27396139]

>>27395988
are you alluding to a 51% attack. Say what you mean.

[Anonymous No.27396202]

>>27396005
that sucks. but like i said you idiots do whatever you want. play your retarded games win your retarded prizes.

i just want to be able to tell you itoldyouso when it blows up in your faces.

[Anonymous No.27396275]

>>27384651
Just remember that Satoshi Nakamoto (Hal Finney) also created Monero (bytecoin) under the pseudonym Nicolas van Saberhagen.

[Anonymous No.27396358]

>>27396202
segwit is bitcoin and a very specific implementation of the protocol

[Anonymous No.27396372]

>>27395738
can be hosted by any 3rd party company and charge bsv for others to access it. The whole bitcoin ecosystem will become more specialised.

[Anonymous No.27396487]

>>27396139
it's not a simple 51% attack. not the same as a 51 for bitcoin. it's more like a 500% attack. it means something entirely different for a coin. a simple 51% can only be used for denial of service attacks. it can't break the rules can't do serious reorgs.
once hashrate vastly larger than your chains does not participate in your consensus your consensus is worthless and has no finality.

[Anonymous No.27396539]

>>27396372
>Trust, don’t verify
See>>27396025

[Anonymous No.27396627]

>>27396358
no it's not any coin can do segwit. it's just a transaction and block structure.

[Anonymous No.27396664]

>>27396358
segwit breaks the chain of digitial signatures aspect thats required to be bitcoin. Adding segwit forked away from the original protocol making it no longer bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.27396682]

>>27396358
The fuck it is.
The Segwit protocol which obfuscates itself from validation by Bitcoin nodes
Miners have to just accept the signature.

[Anonymous No.27396817]

>>27396627
>>27396664
>>27396682
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHqGV5WjS4w&t=1077
ethereum classic is ethereum

[Anonymous No.27396863]

>>27396487
>hashrate vastly larger than your chain
Once a chicken lays and egg larger than a chicken...
500% larger!

[Anonymous No.27397155]

>>27396539
WTF are you talking about? The information is immutably on the Blockchain. What's the problem with a provider accessing the Blockchain ?
There is a whole Twiiter on BSV now and a new company that accesses the Block chain to allow people to look at it the way they like through an extension and addon accessing the chain.

[Anonymous No.27397203]

>>27396817
who gives a shit about eth, we're talking about bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27397293]

>>27397203
which fork of ethereum kept the original ticker?

[Anonymous No.27397601]

>>27397155
The debate’s over, it’s time to start slaughtering you motherfuckers.

[Anonymous No.27397658]

>>27397601
BTC can't scale on chain. It's doomed.

[Anonymous No.27397761]

>>27397293
you think a ticker defines a protocol?

[Anonymous No.27397869]

>>27395800
Not even bsv is following the original protocol...

[Anonymous No.27397941]

>>27397869
Go on and tell us how it's not

[Anonymous No.27398171]

>>27397869
it allows all the functionality that bitcoin v0.1 had. bsv is bitcoin

[Anonymous No.27398210]

>>27397941
Simple: EDA

[Anonymous No.27398617]

>>27385167
cope

[Anonymous No.27398793]

faggots who think btc is bitcoin will be destroyed

[Anonymous No.27398814]

>>27393171
Yes Creg is going to destroy bitcoin at the halvening like he promised

And then the bonded carrier rwill arrive and he will sign a transaction proving he is sathoshi

do the needful

[Anonymous No.27398873]

top kek

[Anonymous No.27398886]

go on

[Anonymous No.27398991]

>>27398814
who give a fuck about craig, read the paper you retarded faggot, its a protocol not a person

[Anonymous No.27399077]

>>27398991
Ask them if they agree with the protocol.
https://i.4cdn.org/biz/1612210677725.jpg

[Anonymous No.27399082]

>>27398171
So what? You actually think people will care about some opcodes? You think people will wake up someday: oh yeah, bsv is bitcoin? There is a reason no one gives a shit about any of those knock offs and when btc dies, something more efficient will take over. When people use xlm (or similar) and send it for a fraction of a penny and can use it instantly, without wasting enormous amounts of energy, they wont go back to: yeah, lets wait for this shit to confirm for minutes to hours.

[Anonymous No.27399300]

>>27399082
last i checked there wasnt a double spend on BSV

[Anonymous No.27399503]

>>27396863
...
>>27396817
>ethereum classic is ethereum
etc is a good example why you don't want a minority hash shitfork on exchanges.

[Anonymous No.27399556]

this is what a big block blockchain looks like

[Anonymous No.27399646]

>>27398991
>read the paper you retarded faggot
read the code you retarded faggot not the paper!
you read a word document and you think you are an expert now? pfeh!

[Anonymous No.27399706]

welcome
to bsv

[Anonymous No.27399710]

BTC stopped being bitcoin when they allowed the blocksize restricion and introduced seqwit, it is no broken, cannot scale, and the double spend broke the entire model. BSV is bitcoin as outlined in the whitepaper, it scales, 300MB blocksize with over 1 million tx, it works better so fuck off. BSV IS BITCOIN in the literal sense. READ THE FUCKING PAPER!

[Anonymous No.27399712]

>>27399503
One question read it and tell me this..
Do you agree or not agree with the protocol as laid out here ?
https://i.4cdn.org/biz/1612210677725.jpg

[Anonymous No.27399758]

>>27399077
that's not the bitcoin protocol tho. that's an abstract. for little children.

[Anonymous No.27399841]

1 sat/vByte fee? come on board!

[Anonymous No.27399866]

[Anonymous No.27399883]

>>27399758
How is that not the Bitcoin protocol ?

[Anonymous No.27399966]

>>27399712
read this >>27399646
i'm an engineer, a coder and i despise your retarded bullshit.
bitcoin is bitcoin. you are trying to bring politics and philosophy into a purely technical system.
it's retarded.

[Anonymous No.27399973]

nothing like a big block blockchain
sync time: ?

[Anonymous No.27399999]

>>27399556
no that's btc
3000 pajeets hugging a block
a bsv train will hold all the pajeets in india and then some

[Anonymous No.27400022]

>>27399082
op codes enable more functionality which leads to more users, only an idiot would dismiss this. xlm, xrp and others that claim to scale all provide a worse user experience than bsv where fees always stay low, zero conf is safe and the network remains free and decentralised. face it, satoshi got the design right the first time, everything that came after is merely a cheap imitation that can't measure up.

[Anonymous No.27400054]

>>27399758
Withdrew some BSV today from an Exchange. Was there in less than a minute.
Sent it to a friend and it was there faster than I could ask them on the phone to wait a minute.

[Anonymous No.27400088]

>>27399883
because it's not even like the drawing of a clock to an actual working clock. it's just a description of a drawing of a clock.
the bitcoin protocol is a billion times more specific.

[Anonymous No.27400105]

>>27390780
and Satoshi isn't autistic?

[Anonymous No.27400106]

>>27399973
0-cong on BSV and 0-fee and no double spends

[Anonymous No.27400132]

bsv
unlimited blocksize
no fee? come on in

[Anonymous No.27400270]

[Anonymous No.27400271]

no limits
only data dumps and network API spam

[Anonymous No.27400296]

>>27399966
WTF does that even mean ?
Bitcoin was created to counteract a very real political problem.
Liberty. So do you agree with the Whitepaper I posted or no ?

[Anonymous No.27400332]

BSV to $10k this year
>suck on that faggots

[Anonymous No.27400407]

big blocks are amazing
you can fit everything into it
next stop: metanet

[Anonymous No.27400431]

>>27399710
2 years ago i used to think that the whole segwit broke bitcoin shit you idiots sprout matters

but then i realized something
no one fucking cares
bitcoin is now a store of value if you want p2p cash there are a ton of better options than btc, bch or bsv

matter of fact is no one wants bsv and if you buy it you hate money

[Anonymous No.27400454]

>>27400407
people using crypto is a bad thing, therefore it is SPAM

[Anonymous No.27400459]

>>27400271
and can still move a days worth of BTC transaction with no third party verification.

[Anonymous No.27400563]

>>27400431
wrong, the only functional coin is BSV.

[Anonymous No.27400614]

you're a nigger gypsy indian leper half kike paki rapespawn?
you're in

[Anonymous No.27400616]

>>27400431
You are right. It doesn't matter that BTC is a store of value.
but that's not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is peer-to-peer digital case with no third parties needed.

So call BTC Store of Value Coin.

[Anonymous No.27400717]

>>27400132
transaction fees at scale will provide more income than the block reward, btc is on borrowed time. once it runs out of greater fools that buy at a higher price it can only crash with no fundamental use floor to protect it. bsv wont suffer from this as its a true currency that is used.

[Anonymous No.27400723]

[Anonymous No.27400726]

>>27400431
Do you agree with this whitepaper ?
https://i.4cdn.org/biz/1612210677725.jpg

Simple yes or no

[Anonymous No.27400832]

if you could smell the big blocks...

[Anonymous No.27400859]

>>27400717
BSV's Twitter PAYS you instead of the advertiser.
I made 2$ just introducing myself and replying twice.

[Anonymous No.27400934]

its funny that the person spamming train pictures is concered about spam on the broken BTC network

[Anonymous No.27400940]

[Anonymous No.27400969]

>>27400296
>WTF does that even mean ?
it means the nakamoto consensus was designed to be enforced and validated by software. not autists sperging on forums. that wouldn't make a very good financial system.

it's the first (and probably the only) trustless permissionless publicly auditable and secure byzantine fault tolerant distributed consensus.
and this is achieved by code and by people that use that code not some lecture or thesis or whatever...

can't you see the beauty of this system? it's amazing.

[Anonymous No.27400976]

>>27400431
its a shitty store of value, gold is more stable, btc is just a ponzi scheme

[Anonymous No.27401056]

[Anonymous No.27401164]

BTC is a broken ponzi that breaks down and fails to function as useage increases, this is why the fees are so high and anyone who thinks BTC is the future is a fucking retard

[Anonymous No.27401184]

>>27400616
>but that's not Bitcoin
the best thing about bitcoin is we don't have to rely on brainlets like you to tell us what it is and what it is not. that's why people love it so much.
>The proof-of-work also solves the problem of determining representation in majority decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs. Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote. The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it. If a majority of CPU power is controlled by honest nodes, the honest chain will grow the fastest and outpace any competing chains.
>Nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. They vote with their CPU power, expressing their acceptance of valid blocks by working on extending them and rejecting invalid blocks by refusing to work on them. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced with this consensus mechanism.

[Anonymous No.27401187]

>>27400969
>trustless permissionless
How is Lightning and Segwit "trustless permissionless"?
It's not. It's a third party solution added on top of the protocol.

So I will ask one more time. Do you agree with the Whitepaper I posted. Read it. Do you disagree with any of the points ?

[Anonymous No.27401194]

[Anonymous No.27401292]

>>27401184
Do you agree with this whitepaper ? yes or no ?
https://i.4cdn.org/biz/1612210677725.jpg

[Anonymous No.27401321]

[Anonymous No.27401337]

>>27401187
>How is Lightning and Segwit "trustless permissionless"?
when you can answer that question, you can finally say you understand bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.27401348]

>>27400022
yep, thats why everyone cares so much about bsv, right? man you people are cringe. and no, there will be no happy ending for you guys, bsv will just juggle along with the market and will get overthrown by defi coins or other hype shit, until its finally outside the top 100 and dwindles into obscurity. doesnt even matter how many times you spit: its the original.

[Anonymous No.27401359]

>>27401184
the code is garbage and the double spend proved it, in theory bitcoin works, but the only protocol what works is BSV

[Anonymous No.27401415]

>>27384651
Not buying your bags, faggot

[Anonymous No.27401489]

>>27401187
>>27401292
i don't agree with you. i don't disagree with the whitepaper. i just don't think it's too relevant as you apparently forget about the parts you don't happen to like. >>27401184

[Anonymous No.27401511]

the jew (greg) fears the real bitcoin (sv).

[Anonymous No.27401543]

[Anonymous No.27401547]

>>27401415
they are not for sale

[Anonymous No.27401630]

>>27401359
>the code is garbage and the double spend proved it
1 no it's not
2 the "double spend" didn't prove anything we haven't already known fora decade except for one thing: even if you bump the fee it's still possible for the first transaction to get confirmed and incorporated to the longest chain.

[Anonymous No.27401770]

>>27401337
I can. It's not.
It's centralized through Blockstream devs (segwit, lightning, block limit)
Blockstream is owned by AXA, who is the #2 company with the most economic power/connections in the world. The owner also runs the Bildberger group.

[Anonymous No.27401800]

>>27401630
it was not RBF it was a double spend, fuckin retard

[Anonymous No.27401892]

>>27401489
>i don't disagree with the whitepaper
Cool because Craig Wright wrote it in 2002 for the Australian Government and got paid 2 million dollars for it's implementation.

[Anonymous No.27401906]

>>27384651
Don't you have a street to shit in somewhere Apu?

[Anonymous No.27401994]

>>27401348
> muh market cap,
> muh price
> muh coinmarketcap ranking
only uitility and scalability matter, which bsv is unprecedented at.

[Anonymous No.27402025]

>>27401630
On January 21st a transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party. Transactions that are computationally impractical to reverse would protect sellers from fraud, and routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers. In this paper, we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributedtimestamp server to generate computational proof of the chronological order of transactions"
--Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System)

[Anonymous No.27402104]

great time to buy too, a bunch of homos are shorting it

[Anonymous No.27402141]

>>27401800
doesn't really matter. there were double spends before rbf this is pretty well known until n confirmation you have no transaction finality in the nakamoto consensus. this was always the case. only brainlets belive otherwise.

what i meant is miner theory suggests a miner will go for the highest fee in case of a double spend ie he receives 2 or more tx with same inputs. but this case proved that it's a bad gamble a miner can pick even the tx with the lowest fee.

[Anonymous No.27402163]

>>27402104
Someone with deep pockets

[Anonymous No.27402247]

>>27402141
okay, but the code itself is fucked so the economics you speak of dont work on btc

[Anonymous No.27402249]

>>27401892
i doubt craig read the bitcoin whitepaper pre 2014.

[Anonymous No.27402278]

for some reason goybase gave me a worthless fraction of this shitcoin
I don't even want that in my wallet

[Anonymous No.27402350]

>>27401994
99.999% of the people in this space (and future retards in this space) dont care about that though. you guys are on the wrong side of history.

[Anonymous No.27402420]

>>27402025
you idiots gonna pretend with a serious face that this is some new revelation? why exactly do you think for most of the past decade 6 confirmations was the norm for a btc transaction to be considered final??

[Anonymous No.27402554]

>>27402249
LMAO... The 2002 Whitepaper for Demorgon is almost exactly the same as the 2009 Bitcoin Whitepaper. Didn't Sathoshi tell us he had been working on it for 10 years.
Know when Craig Started working on that 1999...

[Anonymous No.27402718]

>>27402247
pfeh... i'm a coder i seen the original code i look at the github from time to time every now and then. you drink some weird cool aid and regurgitating it without checking for yourself.
the codebase is decent enough. at first it was very simple then it got worse and it improved a lot after that. hell of a lot of developers worked on it over the years with very high standards.

[Anonymous No.27402837]

>>27402554
word documents word documents...
craig always has so many of them.

[Anonymous No.27403039]

>>27402420
Someone who received a transaction and had a block confirmation had their transaction reversed.

LMAO
The story broke on the 21st day at 21:21 UTC, in the 21st year of the 21st century on a network of 21 quadrillion units, there was a magically small exploit of US$21 on the BTC network, and nobody seems to care—at least not yet.

Long live Magic!

[Anonymous No.27403095]

>>27402350
you talk like a fag and your shits all fucked up
we're building a blockchain based internet that runs on pure economics to provide a superior experience. The masses will join us and not even be aware that they're using bitcoin. BTC won't even be able to survive its next halvening.

[Anonymous No.27403214]

>>27402718
and yet, it can't scale, get the fuck outta here retard

[Anonymous No.27403584]

>>27402837
So now Blacknet is a Word Document lmfao

[Anonymous No.27404160]

>>27403095
desu this argument here >>27402350 is gay and retarded but its not wrong it reflects 99% of the market who couldnt care less about actually using blockchain. my biggest fear is that 99% of the retards out there will simply never wrap their head around whats going on and BSV will die a slow, neglected death because hurr durr aussie man bad. I could literally see it play out that way because were living in clown world after all

[Anonymous No.27404339]

>>27404160
>>27404160
with BTC youre essentially betting on clown world staying clown world
with BSV youre betting on Creg and things that actually make sense
now with the way everything has been going lately Im not sure whats the better bet desu

[Anonymous No.27404431]

>>27391131

They are way to deep into the small block narrative to back out now. The 1mb limit will NEVER be raised.

[Anonymous No.27405121]

BSV is the REAL BITCOIN
It is for WE THE PEOPLE
BCT is for WEALTHY

[Anonymous No.27405226]

>>27404431
Do you rememeber the arguments in 2017 ? It's IMPOSSIBLE for Bitcoin to ever use blocks more than 1mB. Computationally impossible.

FUCKING gangs of people that even mentioned trying 1MB
Where are they all now ?
Calling BSV a pump and dump. thats all they got left.

[Anonymous No.27405607]

>>27403039
>Someone who received a transaction and had a block confirmation had their transaction reversed.
and?
bitcoin worked as designed and intended m8. only one tx was valid for the longest chain. the other block got orphaned.
i don't understand your problem with this.
this is the nakamoto consensus.
there is no double spend on the longest chain. every input can only be spent once.
if you jump the gun after 1 confirmation, it's on you.

[Anonymous No.27405668]

>>27405121
Look what BSV can do with .3% of BTC's Hash Rate. People will wake up when transactions go to $200 an take a day.

[Anonymous No.27405728]

>>27403584
isn't it? if it's from craig then probably fabricated and backdated to the boot.

[Anonymous No.27405778]

BSV is BitCoin
BTC is PonziScamToken

[Anonymous No.27405834]

>>27405668
>People will wake up when transactions go to $200 an take a day.
will they really though?
I think BSVfrens really underestimate how dumb teh market is. not trying to fud here but look at stupid and gullible people are with the corona meme and whatnot

[Anonymous No.27405858]

>>27405668
0.3% that's even more horrible than last time i checked

[Anonymous No.27406041]

>>27405778
that's the tech illiterate brainlet take at least.

[Anonymous No.27406260]

I'm sort of new to this but I've noticed this thread has a lot more anti-OP posters than 'Yeah buy buy buy!' posters

Why is that? Makes it seem like everyone hates BSV.

[Anonymous No.27406324]

>>27405607
No it did not. Not at all.
Yes, there is only 1 chain that survives, only 1 transaction that survives,
It could have been the the wrong transaction that survives.
that’s the whole point!!!!
If you double spend a Lightning Network settlement, you effectively break the entire system.

[Anonymous No.27406413]

>>27405728
Woosh

[Anonymous No.27406643]

>>27405858
>>27406041
*Puts on robe and wizard hat, takes STIFF pipe hit*

I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than buying Segwit.

Honestly, think about it rationally.

You are buying a fake version of BitCoin.

All the hard work you put into your earning money - whether it is wagecucking for Mr. Shekelstein or getting neetbucks from the government. All of it has one simple result: you buy and HODL a fatally flawed version of BitCoin.

Raised the money and bought a whole BTC (CoreCoin)? Great. Who benefits? A random Chinese whale who had nothing to do with the way BitCoin was created.
He gets to dump his bags on you. He gets the benefits of the inflated price that came from the way you HODL'd Segwit Core instead of using BitCoin as money.

As a man who has BTC (Segwit Coin), you are LITERALLY dedicating years of your life simply to HODL'ing and inflating a ponzi shitcoin's price for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck.

Think about it logically.

[Anonymous No.27406704]

>>27405834
>will they really though?
Yes they really will. The people in the market today are not the people in the market in 2018. Now it's a bunch of Zoomers on Robinhood.
Look at the Crypto savvy on here freaking out about Eth and Uniswap fees.
BSV will take care of all that and need a fraction of the hash rate to do it.

[Anonymous No.27407128]

>>27406643
i have nothing against the craig memes there are some i love in fact. i only have issues with retards that claim btc is not bitcoin but their random shitfork is.

sorry cucks frogs don't magically turn into princes even if you go down on them hard.

[Anonymous No.27407230]

>Open Index Protocol
https://youtu.be/hxlADwP0i7E

>Teton County, Wyoming’s land records
https://youtu.be/SWkXCn0JMlQ

>Electron Tomogram Database at Caltech
https://youtu.be/6kzAk79w7PI

>Alexandria
https://youtu.be/Nr0E3jgYyUo

>Streambed
https://youtu.be/nmugYS84Blg

[Anonymous No.27407285]

>>27407128
BTC was a fork.
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/

[Anonymous No.27407333]

>>27407230
No one cares about BSV

[Anonymous No.27407440]

>>27407333
>CloudFlare

[Anonymous No.27407531]

>>27407440
Carbon County, Wyoming’s next

[Anonymous No.27407638]

>>27407531
Firearm blueprints

[Anonymous No.27408120]

>>27407333
Why are you shitting up the thread with a coin with $21,026 volume ?
LOL

[Anonymous No.27408564]

>>27408120
>The Fund will have an eight-year life and a total capital commitment of $45 million.

[Anonymous No.27409011]

>>27408564
...and you think we will invest in a coin with a 26k Volume when we are talking about peer-to-peer cash.

LMAO they don't even have SSL on their explorer.

[Anonymous No.27409664]

>>27407285
not even the first of many. but only 1 fork can be called bitcoin and the nakamoto consensus ensures that there is no question about which one it is.

the longest chain under bitcoin ruleset with the most cumulative hashpower.

[Anonymous No.27409707]

>>27409011
And all this has been accomplished with 1mb blocks
Cope, seethe, etc.

[Anonymous No.27410596]

>>27407531
I wonder when BSV’ers start blowing their brains out

[Anonymous No.27411024]

Lol

[Anonymous No.27411051]

>>27410596
people are so blown away with blockchain. but these centralized permissioned pieces of shits don't excite me at all.
it's true tho for a single corrupt clerk it will be impossible to maliciously alter a registry or lose a document.
that's progress i guess.

[Anonymous No.27411648]

>>27411051
>centralized permissioned pieces of shit
Wrong

[Anonymous No.27411998]

>>27411648
Is Flo Florian coin from Cryptex thing ?

[Anonymous No.27412087]

>>27411648
you don't get it i see.
who is signing the transactions? heh? the trusted authority that maintains the registry. centralized garbage even if by chance the validation would be decentralized and trustless (which i doubt).

[Anonymous No.27412867]

>>27412087
I honestly have no idea what you’re trying to say but this is Teton County’s wallet
https://floexplorer.net/address/FKvUqRc8qdJwMpy5Q22fLJ9qowQtbKW6aL

[Anonymous No.27413566]

>>27390780
/thread

[Anonymous No.27414898]

>>27412867
>Teton County’s wallet
indeed

[Anonymous No.27415010]

>>27409664
segwit drastically altered the ruleset, bsv retains the original ruleset

[Anonymous No.27416287]

>>27414898
That’s your FUD? That the person putting Teton’s records on chain can’t be trusted?

[Anonymous No.27417169]

>>27415010
no it didn't what makes you say that?

[Anonymous No.27417323]

>>27416287
i just said using blockchains like this is centralized permissioned garbage. and not at all the decentralized property titles the cypherpunks envisioned.

[Anonymous No.27417450]

>>27415010
>bsv retains the original ruleset
except for the consensus protocol and the network id and a thousand small things oh and the checkpoints that protected the bch forks from getting violently reorged.

[Anonymous No.27417513]

>>27384651
why? the price isn't doing shit,
the top two guys is a drunk autist and a pedophile documenting his adventures in the third world fucking minors. You fucked up, no one's gonna buy your bags anytime soon

[Anonymous No.27417665]

>>27396275
this

[Anonymous No.27417917]

>>27417323
FLO’s really not all that different than Bitcoin other than the fact you can enter 1040 bytes of information alongside a transaction....

[Anonymous No.27418168]

>>27417917
meh you just don't get it...

[Anonymous No.27418619]

>>27398814
>Yes Creg is going to destroy bitcoin at the halvening like he promised
source or BTFO

[Anonymous No.27418809]

>>27418168
>https://youtu.be/hxlADwP0i7E
Stop arguing and watch this

[Anonymous No.27418841]

Enough new faggots

BSV is bitCoin.

[Anonymous No.27419366]

>>27389104
why are you on a /biz/ board though begging people to buy your bags if you don't care about price?

[Anonymous No.27419817]

If success was about the tech even the shitty 1MB block bitcoin would have replaced SWIFT by now.
No one cares about big blocks.

[Anonymous No.27420536]

>>27419817
>https://youtu.be/Rt2C3CsLi7k
It’s about to