Will we ever see anything like LINK again?

[Anonymous No.27126809]

Unlike the indian (rubics) scam coins we see shilled here constantly who are called "the new LINK", LINK was never shilled in bad faith. The growth of it's popularity was purely organic, for all of you who frequented /biz/ late 2017-2019 you would know this.

Sure there were many, many threads made everyday but not in order to shill but to discuss breadcrumbs and new information. The FUD was elaborate and had its own flavor like shadow fork, Jason Parser, Big Mac addiction, Mobius and Rory. The memes and infographic charts were beyond anything we had seen too, and the Gets were unbelievable. I've been frequenting this board for the past 6 months after being away for 2 years, and NOTHING has caught my attention like LINK did back in late 2017. There is no other coin currently circulating /biz/ with the same cult following as LINK had. Is it simply a matter of being at the right place at the right time, and /biz/ back then was just that? In the last decade we saw three coins that outshined the rest: Bitcoin, Ethereum and Chainlink. I really hope we see three new ones this decade and that /biz/ will be the place to discover them

[Anonymous No.27126925]

Good post fren, here is one bump

[Anonymous No.27126979]

RLC is the only thing that comes close

[Anonymous No.27127020]

I felt pnk was coming along nicely but it’s stagnant

[Anonymous No.27127125]

>>27126809
yee as someone who's been on this board since 2016, nothing really stuck like LINK. The board definitely goes thru phases where new coins are popular and discussed a lot but they usually phased out pretty quickly. I remember XLM and Tron being huge in 2017 but now they've faded to irrelevancy for the most part. At least on this board.

[Anonymous No.27127240]

>>27127020
Everything that has stood against LINK fails eventually. I remember the Holochads bullying us and shilling hard and then that went up in flames too.

[Anonymous No.27127334]

>>27127125
It was some time in early 2018 when I realized that Chainlink was actually the /biz/ coin. I didn't buy until 2019 though because i thought I was smarter than /biz/. Biggest mistake ever. I hope 2000 LINK is enough.

[Anonymous No.27127392]

>>27127240
That was me. Sorry bro. You were right. I bend the knee. Never selling

[Anonymous No.27127521]

>>27126809
No. LINK is unironically the final part of the trilogy, and it will certainly be the most entertaining.

[Anonymous No.27127623]

Statera is the 4th coin of the /biz/apocalypse

[Anonymous No.27127692]

>>27126809

I share your thoughts anon... been here since the ICO but didn’t invest until months after... I guess GRT seems promising and of course the usual Uni SNX aave blah blah but yeah pretty much nothing compares to link. It was the equivalent of finding ethereums sidekick and anyone with a brain knew they would be inseparable projects. I have held my link since I bought and stilll buy occasionally. I’m so desensitized to the price it pains me though. It could go to 50 overnight or 10 overnight and I would believe both. I think we are in good hands though. Link/btc looks ready as well. Agree there is too many scams on biz now it’s a shame

[Anonymous No.27127731]

>all these years later
>still zero real-world use cases
>still zero real-world normie implementations

Completely useless overpriced shit coin

[Anonymous No.27127772]

The only thing that's close is AAVE but it's not discussed enough on /biz/ for some reason

[Anonymous No.27127780]

>>27127731
Just buy some. You know you want to.

[Anonymous No.27128068]

>>27126809
The link journey has been rendered useless by several significant factors
* link shills alienated everyone in the space. It's really hard for companies to take Sergey and friends seriously. In fact the team often have to wait and listen to vicious laughter after identifying themselves
* link went up less that doge. Doge hodlers have already made it while linkies blog post on twitter about muh future revolutionary tech that's always coming soon
* Whales structured the entire scam. They stole memetics from digi marines then astro turfed the entire shitposting campaign using Indians they found on fiverr
*trannies are a plague with link. Linkies have an aversion to being social which is why connecting to external shit means so much to them but they don't understand how to connect so they make multiple trips and talk to themselves for hours in the same thread

[Anonymous No.27129392]

>>27127731
Ahaha okay, cope

[Anonymous No.27129395]

>>27126979
Digital dogshit. Buy rsr

[Anonymous No.27129518]

Unironically RLC

[Anonymous No.27129520]

>>27127731
haha good one anon
can we please stop fudding link now? everyones already priced out

[Anonymous No.27129841]

>>27127772
AAVe is so underrated

[Anonymous No.27130092]

>>27129841
It's just a money market with an amazing team. The race for that hasn't been outrightly won by them

[Anonymous No.27130167]

[Anonymous No.27130284]

>>27129395
Based and reservepilled.

[Anonymous No.27130432]

I've been shilling LTO slightly,
In good faith.
It's growing organically

[Anonymous No.27130514]

>>27126809
Agreed. PNK caught my eye at some point but nothing came out of it. Still waiting for the next link.

[Anonymous No.27130666]

GRT

[Anonymous No.27130859]

>>27126809
Is LINK worth investing into at this point in time, if you haven't before?

I've been recommended by friends in crypto to split among BTC-ETH-LINK. I'm hoping BTC will dip first before I end up being a sucker buying at the top. I'm going to go heavy into ETH because it seems like its set to increase several times over this year.

But LINK? I have honestly no idea.

[Anonymous No.27131006]

>>27130859
Look at the marketcaps. If you're planning to hold for a long time, LINK is an absolute nobrainer. D remember to DCA.

[Anonymous No.27131187]

>>27126809
R
B
C
how many times do we have to say it?

[Anonymous No.27131773]

>>27126809
Alot of coins could do a Link.
Which one ? Don't ask me.
I sold 40k Raiblocks from a faucet 2 weeks before the name change for like $12

ARK, SYS, ZEN, RLC, MLN, WAVES
It's gonna be a boomer alt.

[Anonymous No.27132028]

>>27126809
If GRT had better tokenomics, it’s the closest will come to finding a current LINK in the making. That said, it will be foever somewhat hobbled by the total supply even if most is locked in the functing of the protocol.

[Anonymous No.27132574]

>>27127772
AAVE IS GOOD AND HAS A LONG WAY TO GO BUT NOT UNIQUE. LOOK AT COMPOUND FOR EXAMPLE. SNX COULD BE SOMETHING IF WIDELY ADOPTED.

[Anonymous No.27133658]

>>27126809
ftm but fuck off i'm stil accumultaing

[Anonymous No.27133849]

>>27130859
You won't get a quick buck like shitciin pnds but you will get fuck you money years from now if you actually but real money into it

[Anonymous No.27134014]

>>27127772
qrd on african american vernacular english?

[Anonymous No.27134042]

>>27126809

[Anonymous No.27134128]

>>27128068
2.5/10, apply yourself.

[Anonymous No.27134268]

All of you poor poor fags, you all bought link and you missed out. When can a journey that Rose quickly from $12 up to nearly $30. And then the people that wanted to make money and were scamming this coin, when I hadn't sold and the shit tanked to $18 or so and then it's steady. Around $23. I know it sucks, but that's it. The rest of you held on and you are too afraid to let go because of all the different coins the Shilling 4-link was the best. They made you think it was so much more than it really is. So you keep holding because you know that as time goes on, things generally go up. Well this isn't going to go up much. You should go ahead and put your shit into something else because piece of shit stable coins like Bitcoin are going to have better games over the next three to six months that link. Link will die out within another year or two. It's done.

[Anonymous No.27134687]

>>27130859
>I'm hoping BTC will dip

Stop being a retard. If you think an asset will go up, get that exposure NOW. LINK is worth investing into, it's the backbone of like a dozen other wildly successful projects.

[Anonymous No.27136565]

>>27126979

GRT

[Anonymous No.27136610]

>>27127692

I have been here since. I have the same vibe with GRT

[Anonymous No.27138092]

Dr;ns buy pnk

[Anonymous No.27138249]

>>27126809
No. You had 4 years.

[Anonymous No.27138334]

>>27126809
The new chainlink is still chainlink.

[Anonymous No.27138463]

Anyone know what will be the minimum amout to stake it when we can?

[Anonymous No.27139808]

>>27127334
>I hope 2000 LINK is enough.
yes

[Anonymous No.27141267]

>>27131006
What can it even mathematically get to?

[Anonymous No.27141393]

>>27126809
holy shit, these are some of the biggest lies ever said

disgusting, gtfo

>>27126925
fuck you faggot

You guys are clearly scared huh? Must be the SEC comign down on yall so that's what you guys decided to make these posts and spread these false consensuses.

MAKE IT CLEAR

LINK SHILLING, IS, NEVER, WAS ORGANIC

ALWAYS, PAID FOR

ALWAYS, CONSTANT, DISGUSTING

ALL THE TIME

PAID FOR

[Anonymous No.27141400]

UTU is the African Link.

[Anonymous No.27141455]

>>27138334
never was, never will be dude

[Anonymous No.27141505]

>>27134128
Reasons why Link will fail

1. Zero customers, zero need. No one is going to pay for information to be inserted into a smart contract. That's what an oracle is supposed to do. The problem is a x100 calls costs a x100 times whatever Link charges. If you have to make thousands of calls, that's hundreds of dollars in Link tokens. If I were a dev, it would be much simpler to just make my own call to whatever data I needed.

2. Zero development, all marketing. Link has hired shills, link started on biz and Sergey himself got the inspiration to post, network with and contact people on biz. That's why begging is not allowed on biz, because after link a lot of other tokens tried to copy them. There's a lot of disingenuous shills saying that Link was only made for business cases and biz was never supposed to discover it. Quite the opposite, it was made first as a marketing token.

3. Deceitful. The Link team lies continuously; they'll attend a conference (SIBOS) and say they're partnered with Swift which is a banking protocol that handles these bank conferences, implying that they're going to handle data for big banks. They contacted the Google dev to make an offical blogpost and thus said that they're "partnered" when in fact, it's just a mention. They stretch the truth.

4. Zero transparency. Link raised 32 million in it's ICO. Since then, we have no accounting of their funds. They market dumped twenty to thirty million worth of chainlink (we still don't know the full amount) and never said a word about it. They're still dumping here and there, even larger amounts and believe they are free to do so at any time.

5. Cult-like behavior. 90% of the memes made by Chainlink pose Sergey as this kind of messiah. They encourage zero compromise grounds that anyone should sell their token. They encourage people to buy their tokens despite; mortgages, spousal issues and even when their "investors" are homeless they'll encourage people to buy more.

[Anonymous No.27141568]

Much of that is actual token holders executing transactions because they want to pump their bags, so they execute small orders. Secondly, a lot of that is the actual heartbeat network, chainlink themselves running continual orders to "ensure" their network stays afloat, essentially make it a talking point like you have here. We know zero actual people use chainlink because there are NO DAPPS that actually use their service. Zero. None.

And there never will be, because the cost of using their API will exceed hosting costs such as AWS by many, many multiples. If they wanted to become like AWS for information retrieval in terms of cost, they would need tons of infrastructure which I haven't heard a single peep about. Just more useless marketing which devs, shills or however closely related you are to the team, post here.

The idea doesn't make sense. The service doesn't make sense. And even if it were to, the costs, gargantuan as they are, would not make sense for any company... particularly small startups with zero budget. This is why chainlink is so desperate to show some development by other tokens (the infamous MOAB deflationary token tweet) so that they can marketdump some more and continue their marketing.

Lastly, before I finish this proper spanking and send you home, the service you are referring to is just a contract side price query for Ethereum. Useless because I could do the same thing for ZERO cost with this,

https://api.coinmarketcap.com/v1/ticker/ethereum/

or

https://api.etherscan.io/api?module=stats&action=ethprice

Are you seriously telling me you retards spent over 50 million trying to do that? Create something which I can get a link for and execute immediately then send to a contract I control?

[Anonymous No.27141584]

https://youtu.be/_0O_0D9PbTM

0chain

[Anonymous No.27141626]

Either one of these services cost zero unless I were to make many calls. Let's compare. It costs me about $600 to make 10,000 calls daily... for either one of those APIs... chainlink costs about I think a third of a token?

1/3 of Chainlink, let's give you guys the benefit and say it's $1.00, so about .33 cents. Let's round down more. 30 cents. It costs me 30 cents a call.

10.000 x .3 = $3,000 for one day

vs

$600 for one day

Let's pick the shortest month of the year, 28 days. So in 28 days it would be...

10.000 x .3 = $3,000 x 28 = $84000 (a dev's annual salary)

vs

$600 for one month

Hmmm. Even if they got the cost of their API down to a fifth (which they won't) and the PRICE WENT DOWN (contrary to what the holders want), it would still, NEVER BE AFFORDABLE

Don't you faggots EVER, EVER, EVER, EVER tell me the shilling was "organic." It never fucking was, only gullible idiots got roped in.

THREE YEARS OF PUTTING UP WITH YOUR SHIT, NOT FUCKING BUYING, NOT FUCKING READING

And this is exactly what the SEC will get them for, the paid shilling.

[Anonymous No.27141672]

>>27126809
Are you guys for real? I am epic pol style but i know nothing of crypto. How will link become a big boy?

[Anonymous No.27141700]

PRQ is at the top for most useful and practical real world use cases. It’s being held down by whales dumping their bags every day, though.

[Anonymous No.27141736]

wtf was that bros?

[Anonymous No.27141740]

There's nothing like it. Eth and link, that's the whole stack. Anything else is building on them.

[Anonymous No.27141864]

>>27127334
You'll make it

[Anonymous No.27142456]

>>27136610
I’m working on a stack. How do you feel about ALGO, fren?

[Anonymous No.27142569]

>increases from 20 cents to 20 dollars over 3.5 years

[Anonymous No.27142605]

>>27126809
Link is the new Link

[Anonymous No.27142627]

>>27126809
pnk I guess, amazing product, actually being used and severely undervalued like link in 2017-2018 when everything mooned 10x harder than it did.

[Anonymous No.27142699]

>>27142569
>a measly 100x, pathetic

[Anon No.27142778]

Link is the real link you brainlets

[Anonymous No.27142837]

>>27142699
Many other coins did the same thing without relying on cringe memes and sadly trying to ride BTC/ETH's coattails.

[Anonymous No.27142887]

>>27142605
/thread

[Anonymous No.27142957]

>>27130092
who could win?

[Anonymous No.27143094]

>>27126809
>organic
Nothing is really organic, but it was better obfuscated then comparable campaigns

[Anonymous No.27143144]

>>27128068
you wrote so much text