[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 208 KB, 1280x1280, 1611515733463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26530510 No.26530510 [Reply] [Original]

drive it down to 1c you whale fucks
I
don't
care
you won't get a single one of pubic cubics

>> No.26530597
File: 930 KB, 313x241, 1611306449651.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26530597

not selling my cubes either

>> No.26530677

Remember folks. We are all betting that Rubic could beat Uniswap. If it happens, we will be reward with 40$ Rubic price at least, with this situation. But imply that DEFI is future, that btc will hit 100k, that eth will hit 10k, that it means that Rubic 100$ is realistic. Just do the math and you will understand that I'm not crazy

>> No.26530742
File: 20 KB, 200x200, 7219.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26530742

Are you selling after the 28th? i dont want to but im scared people wont be patient enough and will dump on the 29 or 30. But maybe im just a paper hand faggot

>> No.26530799

>>26530510
But I dont want your pubi rubis.
And neither does anyone else

>> No.26530816

>>26530742
you're insanely paper-handed how new are you?

>> No.26530845

>>26530742
>after the 28th
I mean 2030 is after the 28th so I guess

>> No.26530864

>>26530677
I'm salivating

>> No.26530873

>>26530677
checked but I don't think we will beat uniswap. We *might* get to their current mcap but by the time we do their mcap will have moved way higher.

>> No.26531036

>>26530677
Oh I also love to play the 'what If...' game. Your plan has far too many variables. What if anybody else makes another rubic (like they already did)? Seriously, it's just my opinion.

>> No.26531136

>>26531036
how did nobody made new LINK all these years?

>> No.26531248
File: 162 KB, 680x717, 1610939321654.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26531248

Hope it goes to 1c so i can get another 10 or 20k

>> No.26531849

>>26531136
Chainlink is a big, global company, Rubic is like five boys. And LINK has several challengers, just look up the top 50 and you find 5+ LINKS. Where you will also find uniswap by the way.
I'm really not trying to talk you into something, I also had RBC, fell for this shit and am still angry, sold with loss, but whatever. I learned that there are people here shilling things to make profit with people like us.

>> No.26532021

>>26531849
How long did Chainlink take to get big though? Rubic is such a low mcap obviously a few people dumping can change the price. We have seen over the past few days that 8 cents is basically the floor.

>> No.26532597
File: 54 KB, 300x185, AlexandraKorneva.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26532597

>>26531849
>Rubic is like five boys.
wrong
they have a semen demon

>> No.26532810

>>26531136
Link doesn't really have a product. There's nothing to make new of.

>> No.26533236
File: 93 KB, 445x633, 1611031672462.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26533236

>>26532810
Unironically this anons kek. LINK is all hype, but it makes money so fuck it.

>> No.26533457

Stack
Green
Cubes

>> No.26533545

How many Indians are in this thread right now

>> No.26533615

>>26531849
Uniswap was started by one person

>> No.26533666

>>26531248
Honestly same. I'm all in at this point.

>> No.26533766

Never selling
Eternel shilling
Better dead poor than making it with anorher coin
Amen
Pls die rubicfags

>> No.26533770

>>26532021
>>26532021
Again, Chainlink is not comparable to RBC, they built something that was at this time new and unique.
RBC is another swapper like there are hundrets now, it's five boys from russia (plus one female). I don't want to disrespect rubic here, their project may be good and working, but it is what it is, it's abolutely nothing new and has many many competitors. Maybe they make it and get bigger than uniswap, well it's possible, I'm just saying it's not that likely that you want it to be because you obviously lost a lot of money in RBC.

And why is fucking LINK always the excuse? The PnD on LINK was there and many people lost a lot of money, a very big lot more than in Rubic, but it happened to be a great project anyways and it shot to the top 10, yes. But there is no connection between this two events. It's like getting hit by a car and finding a hundret dollar note on the streets while smashing your face. You should absolutely not run into cars to find a hundret dollars tho, but open your eyes and look without the need of getting hit by fucking car, you should just do your own research and find a good shitcoin yourself, not falling for a PnD and hiping the shitcoin will make it anyways because LINK, one of thousands of failed PnD shitcoin projects actually made it. LINK is LINK, RBC is RBC, you god fucked by a pump and dump and no think about what to do. If you really believe RBC will become bigger than metamask, then go for it, I wish you the best of luck, but I fucking don't.
And by the way, I never was on the Link-Fanwagon, but felt the need to protect it anyways.

>> No.26533918

>>26532810
Link is no excuse for you for falling for a pumo and dump. List every other PnD that failed, I'll wait.

>> No.26533952
File: 518 KB, 1622x1622, Rupee-Magic-Needful-.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26533952