AMA crypto "secret" project lead here, not announced yet

[Anonymous No.26468347]

NO LARP. Been talking with some of you in the past months and I come back again today.
Been building a crypto-based project with a small team of highly skilled techies/designers. It involves data at a massive scale and NLP. It's infrastructure, it's web. Blockchain/AI architect here./

I'll announce the ICBO on biz in its first hours, because most of you are actually nice folks. I've discussed with some of you and I now am 100% convinced that our concept + tokenomics are sound (and solving actual problems kek).


I have 1 question for my loved anons, where hesitation remains: should we build our L1 mainnet on Ethereum + a Layer 2 or a scalable chain directly (Algo, Dot, Ada). Pros: future proofing, Cons: no Ethereum ecosystem, less visibility

AMA.

[Anonymous No.26468484]

Post a pic of your hand with timestamp and I might buy

[Anonymous No.26468611]

if you're being serious and have the drive and vision for working on the project long term I'd say a scalable chain because eth mainnet sucks

[Anonymous No.26468693]

>>26468484
Asked for a timestamp, here you go.
+ Bump, no larp, legit project tech lead here. I see these interactions as win-win

[Anonymous No.26468799]

>>26468611
Algorand mainnet is really attractive desu (A bit less by Polka), but can't imagine how people feel if they can't buy an ERC20 token on Uniswap (and similar things). Spent 3 years ont the conception and R&D, can't afford to fail our token sale. Thanks for the input

[Anonymous No.26468896]

bump

[Anonymous No.26468925]

Build it on AVAX. Also, send me a hefty ICO

[Anonymous No.26469015]

>>26468925
been considering Avalanche, but there are constraint with that L1. Documentation is nice, like Algo.
> Also, send me a hefty ICO
will do

[Anonymous No.26469024]

>>26468693
Why do you have a zoomer keyboard

[Anonymous No.26469068]

>>26468347
Build on ADA + post hand and I'll throw 1k USD at it no larp

[Anonymous No.26469076]

>>26469024
I wonder the same now

[Anonymous No.26469119]

>>26468693
Zoomer keyboard no thanks

[Anonymous No.26469154]

>>26469068
But ADA doesn't have smart contracts yet, can't wait until march or even later. A real bummer though desu, really love ADA tech.
> post hand and I'll throw 1k USD at it no larp
>>26468693
Appreciate it so much, thanks for the positive energy

[Anonymous No.26469205]

>>26469119
sad but fair enough, can't match Vitalik's badass style

[Anonymous No.26469231]

>Blockchain/AI architect here./

my question is: how do you take yourself seriously?

[Anonymous No.26469303]

>>26469231
Not taking myself seriously at all, just stating my role in this project.

[Anonymous No.26469350]

>>26468347
https://docs.fantom.foundation/

[Anonymous No.26469408]

>>26469350
very good idea, thanks. Never considered that option before

[Anonymous No.26469541]

>>26469408
Np anon, good luck with your project

[Anonymous No.26469590]

>>26468347
When will ICO announcement come? Also, scalable chain directly (ALGO, AVAX)

[Anonymous No.26469603]

>>26468347
>>26468693
L1 then L2?

[Anonymous No.26469941]

>>26469541
much appreciated.
>>26469590
Mid February. Okay the balance is really towards scalable chain I see. Glad to see that kind of input. I really thought most of you would have said to go for Ethereum "for the network effect / ecosystem impact"
>>26469603
Can you elaborate?

[Anonymous No.26470056]

last bump?

[Anonymous No.26470167]

>>26469015

Do more research for sure on avax, it’s pretty incredible. Did a few transactions myself and it’s pretty instant. I’m working for a DeFI protocol that is looking into adopting it right now, actually.

[Anonymous No.26470331]

>>26470167
Will do more research on it, surely saw a lot of hype around it, but Algo/Ftm looks pretty solid

[Anonymous No.26470376]

>>26469941
>Can you elaborate?
Well, a lot of devs do L1 first for exposure and token distribution, and then L2 for long-term. Thinking of Bao here, as well.

[Anonymous No.26470521]

>>26470167
I was also surprised with the transaction speed of Avax. Doing a bit more research after that made me a believer.

[Anonymous No.26470577]

>>26468347
no one fucking cares, drop the fucking links or gtfo

[Anonymous No.26470642]

use a base chain besides ETH if you're going to have a frontend good enough for normies. I think that's the key here. If you're expecting normies to navigate the money legos world then you're going to miss out by not putting it on ETH, since that will at least be a bit easier for them to manage.

[Anonymous No.26470700]

>>26470376
Yes, but seems really not a good approach long-term. Transitions are always hurting the community, especially early imho.
>>26470521
transaction speed is also very impressive on FTM and Algo (probably also on Cardano when live). Not a main competitive aspect but for sure will investigate this network for my more advanced tech concerns.
>>26470577
dubs checked, links will come.

[Anonymous No.26470746]

>>26468799

eth is king. also use chainlink in whatever it is you're doing pls

[Anonymous No.26470784]

>>26470642
Definitely, frontend is requiring a scalable backend (so ETH + LAYER 2 like SKALE was an option)
> since that will at least be a bit easier for them to manage.
Interesting, what do you mean by that? Managing their coins (if they are not like on Metamask?)

[Anonymous No.26470893]

>>26470746
Of course, oracles are a big part of the stack

The main big issue with ETH as L1, is that it kills any incentive to participate in DAOs and other microservices (high fees) that are usually built on the L1. Don't know how people would respond to having tokens on a L2+core DAO on a L2 as well. That's why FTM/AVAX/ALGO are attractive af

[Anonymous No.26470901]

anon how do we ensure we're the first to get in? any breadcrumbs?

also: Ethereum and await Eth 2.0

[Anonymous No.26470921]

Avax.

[Anonymous No.26471072]

>>26470784
normie adoption = gold. normies are too stupid do do anything besides clicking on buttons and filling out forms. that means anything requiring understanding of {EIP20, blockchain, wallet, transaction, swap, pool} it's just going to box you into being a purely niche activity for crypto enthusiasts.

the big money in crypto projects is going to come from having an interface as simple as coinbase's, because with a simple interface you're not limited by the general public's stupidity when engineering your project

[Anonymous No.26471092]

>>26470901
I'll make some AMA for the project a few times before doing the ICBO. Then I'll specifically post here to announce the ICBO, and well you'll know directly that you are early by looking at the bonding-curve.

[Anonymous No.26471200]

>>26471072
"normie adoption" = accessibility is definitely the main point behind the whole design. I really like that you think that too. Everything is going to be "keep it stupid simple" on the frontend, as much as possible (product is still a data tech service). But indeed normies will be able to use it without wallets (no metamask), so I appreciate this reply very much

[Anonymous No.26471499]

>>26468799
Trying to avoid Rubic pajeet shitflinging here so don't get off-topic, cross-chain swaps will undoubtedly be developed in the future. Whoever actually does it first doesn't matter. It'll happen within the year I'm sure. If nothing else, you can make a bridge yourself and have arbitrage bots take care of the rest. It should be fine to make it on whatever chain works best for your tech if the release is months away.

[Anonymous No.26472476]

>>26471499
Checked. I'm hoping for the same!