Time to bend over and stretch out those boi pussys corecucks

[Anonymous No.26312242]

Craig is about to fuck you all no condom

[Anonymous No.26312276]

i want to wear Craig's skin

[Anonymous No.26312296]

any day now huh? since 2018 any day we could have been fucked but somehow it never happens.

[Anonymous No.26312387]

>>26312296
He doesn’t know
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/linked/91928/craig-wright-lawyers-ask-websites-take-down-bitcoin-whitepaper

[Anonymous No.26312599]

>>26312387
*yawn*
an other word document...

[Anonymous No.26312649]

>>26312276
creg has no foreskin

[Anonymous No.26312651]

>>26312387
https://bitcoin.org/en/posts/regarding-csw
btw let's see how this plays out craig can't back out now from a lawsuit.

[Anonymous No.26312660]

>>26312599
>creg has copyright on bitcoin
>creg enforces copyright
>corecucks comply immediately
>"i-i-its nothing anon, keep hodling!"

[Anonymous No.26312698]

>>26312660
no such thing happened and now craig has no copyright on bitcoin.
he has a claim for copyright but copyright goes to the author.

[Anonymous No.26312749]

>>26312660
>corecucks comply immediately
i'm not saying this is not hilarious and shameful.
bunch of cowards.

[Anonymous No.26312842]

>>26312242
you faggot kikes and your faggot fantasies need to be gassed.

[Anonymous No.26312844]

lost all respect for core devs, what a little bitch

[Anonymous No.26312901]

We believe there is no doubt we have the legal right to host the Bitcoin whitepaper. Furthermore, Satoshi Nakamoto has a known PGP public key, therefore it is cryptographically possible for someone to verify themselves to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Unfortunately, Craig has been unable to do this.

We will continue hosting the Bitcoin whitepaper and won’t be silenced or intimidated. Others hosting the whitepaper should follow our lead in resisting these false allegations.

Posted to the Bitcoin.org Site Blog on 21 January 2021 by Cøbra

i don't know who this cobra guy is but he gained some respect points with me. i just have the sinking feeling he is a cashie.

[Anonymous No.26313000]

>>26312844
yeah their justification is that the licensing is unclear to them regarding the whitepaper (not the source code mind you) and satoshi did not publish the whitepaper at their site so they scrambled to take it down.

yes despicable cowardice even if it has some logic to it. what's next craig faketoshi wright claims copyright to the bitcoin logo and they take it down too?

[Anonymous No.26313083]

>>26313000
all in good time, Xo41m7l

[Anonymous No.26313136]

>>26312901
cobra guy is as hilarious as that csw faggot
"Whitepaper is outdated and incorrect, promotes flawed understanding of Bitcoin, responsible for a lot of the “longest chain is Bitcoin” FUD."
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status
/921096650340360192
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1349896028879773700

[Anonymous No.26313185]

>>26313136
yeah cashies like to cherry pick stuff from the whitepaper that suit their agenda. that said the whitepaper is outdated and inaccurate. it was outdated and inaccurate the moment satoshi released the first bitcoin codebase.

[Anonymous No.26313218]

>>26312242
>>26312296
*craig continues to fade away into irrelevance*

[Anonymous No.26313221]

>>26313000
>what's next craig faketoshi wright claims copyright to the bitcoin logo and they take it down too?
close, but next hes going for the Bitcoin name and ticker symbol

[Anonymous No.26313290]

>>26313185
this is a very strong claim
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/the-bitcoin-whitepaper-by-satoshi-nakamoto.2002/

[Anonymous No.26313431]

i'm gonna host this shit myself see if the fat fraud sues me

[Anonymous No.26313481]

>>26313431

[Anonymous No.26313523]

>>26313431
me?

[Anonymous No.26313536]

>>26313481

[Anonymous No.26313586]

>>26313536

[Anonymous No.26313630]

>>26313586

[Anonymous No.26313631]

>Craig will kill bitcoin in 2020
>satoshis shotgun
>segwit is dead

[Anonymous No.26313641]

nonono, it should be like this:

N

[Anonymous No.26313649]

>>26313000
what else you expect from some beta tard who codes bitcoin core for free... probably some incel who got bullied all his life

[Anonymous No.26313691]

>>26313630

[Anonymous No.26313736]

>>26313691

[Anonymous No.26313788]

>>26313736

[Anonymous No.26313829]

>>26313788
and the last one

[Anonymous No.26313847]

Corecucks hate the whitepaper and go against everything in it but refuse to remove it when asked nicely by its creator, they are going to get STIFFED hard

[Anonymous No.26313853]

>>26313000
>15 posts by this ID

lmao the cope is surreal, please lube that asshole already for craigs stiff horse cock

[Anonymous No.26313885]

>>26313829
anon, it doesn't work like that

[Anonymous No.26313891]

>>26313853
9 of that is the whitepaper to be fair

[Anonymous No.26313938]

>>26313885
don't worry i will make a website and host the original pdf too but that will take more than 5 minutes.

[Anonymous No.26314117]

>>26313938
forgot this page

[Anonymous No.26314233]

>>26313290
>this is a very strong claim
but objectively true.
see, the whitepaper oversimplified how bitcoin transactions work and many retards regurgitate the bullshit about missing signatures since 2017. even tho since the very first release bitcoin utxos were not spendable by digital signatures but by a sig-script executing to true and also bitcoins since the first release were not chains of signatures but unspent transaction outputs.

these are undisputable technical facts for anyone not tech illiterate enough to lap up craigs bullshit. yet... for years and years imbeciles been screaming about the whitepaper and how they imagined bitcoin works.

yeah the whitepaper is just a thesis it was never how bitcoin truly worked in actual. it was just giving you a rough idea about bitcoin.

still removing it like this... this is a fucking travesty.

[Anonymous No.26314331]

>>26314233
>whitepaper oversimplified
this is what whitepapers generally do