[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 377 KB, 390x478, pzv2k8hp8xg41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312190 No.26312190 [Reply] [Original]

LOL

https://hackernoon.com/iota-vs-raiblocks-413679bb4c3e

>Let’s picture a scenario where we reach 75 billion IoT devices by 2025. Let’s forget, to keep things simple, that there will be billions of people owning cryptocurrencies by 2025. Therefore, let’s also assume that these IoT devices own all the crypto (Skynet!?). Now, let’s make a few calculations. The average amount of crypto that will be shared among these future 75 billion devices will be on the order of 37 thousand IOTA (or 37 kIOTA) or 1.78 octillion raw RaiBlocks (or 1.78 kXRB). From this, we can see that there will be much more flexibility in the transactional sense for RaiBlocks than for IOTA. This leads me to think that RaiBlocks could very well dominate the IoT space in the coming years, unless IOTA upgrades their protocol to either increase the max supply or allow for divisible IOTAs.

>> No.26312263

Based, but NANO can't transact data yet, it need a little update

>> No.26312364

>>26312190
Wow, so this is what it's like to be a retard. Interesting.

>> No.26312610

>>26312190
Jai maa kali

>> No.26312696
File: 169 KB, 2048x1536, 1505011438365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26312696

>>26312610
>Jai maa kali
THE CHAD ARYAN NANO WARRIOR
vs.
the virgin centralized iota jihadist