/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.25925117]

>$1 stable oil

[Anonymous No.25925204]

Hold your RLC. Dfinity is nothing, won't overtake RLC on launch at all. Just HODL oilmarine.

[Anonymous No.25925224]

>>25925204
There's always another shitcoin mooning

[Anonymous No.25925293]

>>25925117
>How can you lube a real anus using digital oil?
I still don't get the technology

[Anonymous No.25925317]

>>25925224
Dfinity is a direct competitor, and hasn't even launched yet.

[Anonymous No.25925476]

>>25925317
so what are you expecting, a brand new project with no tech and no connections to overtake iexec on hype and then not dump?
>lead engineer Khushboo Bindlish
not buying

[Anonymous No.25925800]

>>25925317
It's been unlaunched since 2017. What's the game plan?

[Anonymous No.25925876]

>>25925476
>no tech and no connections
In for a rude awakening kek

[Anonymous No.25926157]

>>25925876
okay anon I'll just take your word for it.

[Anonymous No.25926187]

>>25925317
>Direct competitor
4 years behind and shit tokenomics

[Anonymous No.25926229]

>>25926187
Yet it will launch at 10x RLC market cap, easy. Not having a launched mainnet is not the same as being behind. Nobody uses RLC.

[Anonymous No.25926357]

>>25926187
Dfinity is shit. I've look into it. No partnerships. Doesn't provide confidential computing. Doesn't offer oracles. Doesn't have any ability to network through affiliated rent seekers. Is non-compliant with regulatory bodies. Hasn't sought any enterprise adoption.
Good luck

[Anonymous No.25926402]

>>25925117
I'm holding and buying on dips currently.

[Anonymous No.25926504]

>>25926357
>Doesn't provide confidential computing. Doesn't offer oracles.
False. Arbitrary applications. Especially oracles are trivial to do.

[Anonymous No.25926777]

>>25926504
Show proof. Any working examples or just marketing?

[Anonymous No.25926860]

>>25926777
Do you understand what an arbitrary application is?

[Anonymous No.25926912]

>>25926860
So just marketing then.

[Anonymous No.25926992]

>>25926912
https://github.com/Dfinity-Bjoern/Magnify
Have a look at the following, it's not an oracle but a video streaming application. Something that can run that can obviously grep some data off a feed and do whatever with it.

[Anonymous No.25927158]

>>25926777
Checked.
Dfinity is marketing garbage with zero connection to cryptos overall ecosystem. It will get a listing pump and then dump into oblivion as people realize it's a failed VC investment scam

[Anonymous No.25927220]

>>25927158
>marketing garbage
>zero connection
>dump into oblivion
>failed VC investment scam
Increasingly nervous. RLC has been going nowhere for years.

[Anonymous No.25927268]

>>25927158
Dfinity fundations owns like 90% of the supply, basically the next Harmony

[Anonymous No.25927845]

>>25927268
Ouch

[Anonymous No.25927903]

I knew the top was in when RLC pumped. Utter piece of dog shit.

[Anonymous No.25927963]

>>25927220
It's been stabley moving forwards in development and adoption
Stay poor noiler.
>>25927268
Yeah that's disgusting. Shit tokenomics will plague that project like it did to golem

[Anonymous No.25928026]

>>25927963
>adoption
Let's see it. Nobody uses RLC.

[Anonymous No.25928230]

>>25928026
Not for long pajeet, no one will EVER use dfinity

[Anonymous No.25928349]

>>25928230
So there's no adoption? Got it.

[Anonymous No.25928849]

>>25928349
No shit retard buy high

[Anonymous No.25929170]

>>25928849
Hold while it fades into irrelevancy. Muh legal opinions is a stalling tactic.

[Anonymous No.25929305]

secret emails, what was I thinking

[Anonymous No.25929370]

>>25925117
Why isn't it pumping? iExec is literally the best tech of 2020.

[Anonymous No.25929458]

>>25927268
Actually 98%

[Anonymous No.25929490]

>>25925117
>$1 stable oil
>$10 stable oil
>$100 stable oil
>$1000 stable oil
>$10000 stable oil
>$100000 stable oil

[Anonymous No.25929609]

>>25929170
hey at least my coin is released and in adoption phase

[Anonymous No.25929831]

>>25929370
it's french. french projects are cursed. they may have a great usecase, an amazing idea, a working product, institutional support, regulatory clarity -- but for whatever reason they just never go anywhere.
t. PNK and RLC bagholder

[Anonymous No.25929895]

>>25929609
*stalled in adoption phase for three years

[Anonymous No.25930243]

>>25929895
It just entered adoption phase this year pajeet kek

[Anonymous No.25930365]

>>25930243
Just words. Adoption phase starts when it's usable. Why is nobody using RLC?

[Anonymous No.25930514]

>>25930365
>Just words
COPE

[Anonymous No.25930569]

>>25930365
Because the team isn't as good as buzzwords and marketing a nonexistent product like dfinity

[Anonymous No.25930729]

>>25930569
>Because the team isn't as good at buzzwords and marketing
Hey, just read this text and tell me its not filled to the brim with buzzwords.

[Anonymous No.25930847]

>>25930729
>I don't understand what these words mean so they are buzzwords
iExec has completed all of these things and they are all usable right now
projects like dfinity are buzzword projects, because they havent and will never deliver on the words they speak unlike iExec

[Anonymous No.25930949]

Why would anyone think investing in oil which the whole world has an excess of would be a good idea. Fucking pajeets I swear

[Anonymous No.25931008]

>>25930949
digital oil is locked at 87 million barrels kike

[Anonymous No.25931295]

>dfinity tard and cudos tard keep trying to get me to buy their shitcoins

[Anonymous No.25931914]

>>25930729
holy kek that is peak cryptospeak
>>25931295
no doubt you'll be happier holding the eternal $1 coin

[Anonymous No.25931986]

>>25931914
>$1 stable oil for 4 years is bearish
Do you have any idea how wrong you are?

[Anonymous No.25932035]

>>25931986
Yeah that's bearish.

[Anonymous No.25932095]

WHAT
WAS
I
THIINKINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

[Anonymous No.25932156]

>>25932035
>He doesn't see it
Are you...gay? or just blind

[Anonymous No.25932189]

>>25932156
>the chart predicts future price
No, I don't see it. Enlighten me.

[Anonymous No.25932264]

>>25932189
its an oscillator. dude i didnt graduate school and i know this fundamental of investing. if the chart is going up and down, its an oscillator. if it flatlines its a dump. this is 101 stuff

[Anonymous No.25932265]

>>25932189
>Higher highs and higher lows for the past 3 years
>maintained 1$ during much of that time
it's over for you noiler

[Anonymous No.25932319]

>>25932264
clearly that isn't what >>25932265 meant. Again proving TA is bs.

[Anonymous No.25932370]

>>25932319
>chart lining up with adoption phase
>eRLC release will cause a massive price increase
>new oracle demo showing fiat to RLC for enterprises will cause it to spike to 15$
>AI marketplace dApp
So much so little time

[Anonymous No.25932446]

>>25932370
>>eRLC release will cause a massive price increase
Nope.
>>new oracle demo showing fiat to RLC for enterprises will cause it to spike to 15$
Nope.
>>AI marketplace dApp
Thing nobody asked for an nobody will use, just like all the features launched in v1, v2, v3, v4, and v5

[Anonymous No.25932528]

>>25932370
>new oracle demo showing fiat to RLC for enterprises will cause it to spike to 15$
I'm betting everything on this, if a fiat to RLC swap doesn't cause a price spike then it's over

[Anonymous No.25932542]

>>25932446
>>>eRLC release will cause a massive price increase
>Nope.
>>>new oracle demo showing fiat to RLC for enterprises will cause it to spike to 15$
>Nope.
>>>AI marketplace dApp
>Thing nobody asked for an nobody will use, just like all the features launched in v1, v2, v3, v4, and v5
Yes
yes
intel wrote a webpage on it
Imagine staying poor in 2021?
can you?
I can imagine biz at the end of 2021
>"what is the next RLC guys, wtf you said it was a shitcoin and it went 2000x"

[Anonymous No.25932549]

>>25932446
weak FUD. Half the FUD on this board is just somebody going "NOPE! NOPE! NAH MANN NOPE!"

[Anonymous No.25932586]

>>25932542
Sounds like you're very sure about this. I bet you were just as sure when you invested in RLC instead of link lmao

[Anonymous No.25932633]

>>25932549
Replying "No" to someone saying "oh man this will definitely cause the price to go to arbitrary price target" is completely reasonably.

[Anonymous No.25932653]

>>25932586
>implying i didn't make 500k off of LINK
i am a 1000% better trader and investor than you will ever be
I now have 50k RLC which cost me basically nothing riskwise but will gain me at least 5 million by 2022 or 23 at worst.
not even worried if RLC fails the entire altcoin space will fail too, because iExec is teh best team

[Anonymous No.25932897]

>>25932633
checked but good news in the pipeline and an oscillating chart say differently. well see

[Anonymous No.25932974]

>>25932653
ok kek, post wallet

[Anonymous No.25933147]

>>25925117
>stable

[Anonymous No.25933295]

>>25932974
>>25925204
you again lmao we btfo'd you in the other thread and you conceded by saying market will decide which coin will win
what the fuck are you on bro

[Anonymous No.25933325]

>>25933147
You're posting sats instead of dollars dumbass

[Anonymous No.25933370]

>>25933295
You BTFOd yourself in the thread and by holding RLC for all this time.

[Anonymous No.25933951]

>>25933370
No, you stupid retarded mouthbreathing faggot, we BTFO'd your idiotic imbecile village cretin arguments

here's the thread if anyone's interested
https://yuki.la/biz/25788942

[Anonymous No.25934101]

>>25929831
People who were early on PNK did x15 in 2 years. I'm in RLC since 3 years and a half and did x2.

[Anonymous No.25934138]

>>25934101
and in 1 more year RLC will do 1000x and pnk will do shit on streets

[Anonymous No.25934239]

>>25933951
Mate, you don't know how marginal cost works and that thread makes it very clear.

[Anonymous No.25934341]

>>25934138

please be true

[Anonymous No.25934357]

>>25934101
People made 20x in FUN in 2017, now they have nothing. People made 3x in Chainlink in 2017, now they have 80x.

[Anonymous No.25934420]

>>25934138
>one more year
You guys were saying the same shit every year since 2018
I'm holding for now but as long as the bearmarket kicks in I dump everything

[Anonymous No.25934434]

>>25934239
oceanjeets and dfinityfags always shitting up oiler threads

[Anonymous No.25934494]

>>25934434
And I'm going to keep doing so. At least we can agree on the following: fuck niggers

[Anonymous No.25934513]

i am spamming secret emails to popular crypto people KEK this is peak crypto tech

[Anonymous No.25934581]

>>25934239
i see you don't want to stop the display of your limitless stupidity
iexec works like a factory without having the costs of one, and dfinity works like a factory

the cost of dfinity's data centers will be higher than average users because of the following, but not limited to: maintenance, broken hardware, expensive employees, security guards, cleaning crew, inflation of everything, infrastructure, cooling, land costs, legal costs, etc., even with bulk buying which would only compensate for about 3 months price, as opposed to the average user connecting together with other users forming an unbreakable web of cloud computing.

kys

[Anonymous No.25934630]

>>25934581
>I still do not understan marginal cost
good to hear

[Anonymous No.25934690]

>>25934630
thank you for proving me right that you are a fucking retard with no objective arguments to back up your ludicrous claims

kys

[Anonymous No.25934727]

In real combat till death, Gilles vs Bruce Lee, who would win?

[Anonymous No.25934735]

>>25934581
this nigger gets it
datacenters will always be more costly than millions of people in an open marketplace with no overhead costs

[Anonymous No.25934754]

>>25934690
tb h it's all there in the other thread that you posted, I explained it multiple times so there's no need to rehash it. anyone who has taken an intro to business admin understands how marginal cost works.

[Anonymous No.25934823]

>>25934754
iExec is decentralized marginal costs
imagine thinking anyone wants to deal with overhead costs kek

[Anonymous No.25934857]

>>25934823
>decentralized marginal costs

[Anonymous No.25934861]

>>25934754
Why won't datacenters like AWS use RLC? What makes dfinity better?

[Anonymous No.25934955]

NSMDO FUCK NOILERS DOTB GILLES LOVES TRANNIES DE LUXE FROM JAKARTA (or Thailand, I am not quite sure)

[Anonymous No.25935003]

>>25934861
A datacenter running RLC is definitely possible and is on par with dfinity in terms of the marginal cost issue. I don't see AWS using either so the point is kinda moot.
Dfinity is, in my opinion, better because it's completely integrated in that the application and the smart contract are the same thing, live in the same environment, which removes a ton of complexity. Instead of an ETH contract interacting with an RLC application, it's just "an application" living in the dfinity environment that has a lot fewer constraints.

[Anonymous No.25935108]

>>25934735
And that's a fucking fact...

[Anonymous No.25935187]

>>25934754
your unbounded ineptitude forgot you caved in to the objective arguments you were handed with from me and the other anon, more like pearls before swine, but i'll repeat it here for the sake of your humiliation in front of the other anons

you said: a factory doesn't have a lower cost than people sewing by hand
see the problem?

we said: iexec works like a factory without having the costs of one, and dfinity works like a factory

you said: No. You don't get the cost savings of buying in bulk if you don't buy in bulk. That said you could get these savings by having a datacenter *and* offering it on iexec. Point is home PCs will always be more expensive.

we said: bulk buying WILL NOT COMPENSATE for all the other costs

you said: Yes it does, otherwise we wouldn't have an industrialized society.

we said: you do realize that getting a 5-10% discount for buying in bulk will only matter for a few months, maybe 3, then you'll have to pay for upkeep costs, maintenance costs, employee costs, taxes, property taxes, repairs etc and those costs will drive dfinity's cost up, thus it WILL NOT COMPENSATE with cheaper hardware

you said: I guess we'll just have to let the market decide

BTFO'd

kys

[Anonymous No.25935246]

>>25935003
No.
If I want to deploy something to iExec's network I just have to containerize it. If I want to deploy something to Dfinity I have to learn a fucking programming language that is creepy mixture of Javascript and Go

[Anonymous No.25935279]

>>25935187
I encourage any anons here to read the whole thread instead of this "summary". The gist is: Industrial producers always have lower marginal cost than smaller operations, and anyone that doesn't see that is retarded.

[Anonymous No.25935292]

>>25935003
>I don't see AWS using either so the point is kinda moot.
AWS can use iExec on the backend for zero cost(besides cost of staking, but that is irrelevant to the overall net positive of using iExec) and get all the benefits of decentralization. It will possibly make them even more profitable and secure/stable. Zero potential downtime, because iExec can be used on the backend to secure computing power from say, Microsoft, if something goes down.

The power of iExec is not obvious normie adoption, it's secret adoption by enterprises and used on the backend.

You can see this potential in the secret email demo.

If you didn't know you were using iExec you would have zero clue you're using a blockchain technology.

ITS GOING TO BE A FUCKING HUGE DEAL NIGGERS. NO ONE WANTS TO USE CRYPTO. IT'S TOO ANNOYING, BUT ENTERPRISES WILL TO SAVE OR GAIN MONEY. THEREFORE YOU WILL BE USING IEXEC WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEK

[Anonymous No.25935432]

>>25935279
Decentralized economy of scale hasnt existed until now retard. Enjoy your shitcoin that never released while we moon

[Anonymous No.25935449]

>>25935279
THIS FUCKING RETARDED NIGGER SAYS THAT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCERS (factory-like) HAVE LOWER COSTS THAN USERS (no factory-like expenses) WHO HAVE NO COSTS AT ALL

HIS ONLY ARGUMENT IS THAT FACTORY BUYS IN BULK AND THAT WAY IT'S CHEAPER

LOOK AT HIM
LOOK AT HIM AND LAUGH

LMAO

kys

[Anonymous No.25935494]

>>25935449
The fact that you have to try this hard to convince yourself should tell you something.

[Anonymous No.25935500]

>>25935449
>HE THIKNS MUH FACTORY OF SCALE CAN OUTPRICE A DECENTRALIZED FACTORIES OF SCALE LOCATED ON A DIGITAL MARKETPLACE
KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEEKEKKEEKEKEKKEKEKEKEKEEKKEKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

[Anonymous No.25935535]

WHAT
WAS
I
THINKING

[Anonymous No.25935566]

>>25935535
WHEAT THE FAK WUZ WE THINKING?
DIGITAL SOIL?
1$ STALEOIL?

[Anonymous No.25935602]

>>25935494
thank you for proving me right yet again that you are a fucking retard with no objective arguments to back up your ludicrous claims

pic related, it's you

[Anonymous No.25935622]

>>25925117
*stabooleans activated*

[Anonymous No.25935647]

>>25935622
ACTIVATE ZE STABOOLEANS!

[Anonymous No.25935673]

God I love you autists sperging out about some dogshit projects when 99 out of 100 people don’t understand cloud computing

[Anonymous No.25935704]

>>25935673
THEY DONT FUCKING NEED TO
DID YOU NEED ANY CRYPTO TECH UNDERSTANDIGN TO USE THIS ???????
https://confidential-computing.iex.ec/private-data/overview

I DIDNT THINK SO YOU FUCKING RETARD
IEXEC'S BIGGEST POWER IS BEING USED ON THE BACKEND
NOT THE FRONT END
BUT EVENTUALLY IT WILL BE

[Anonymous No.25935710]

>>25925476
New project with new hype vs

4 years
0 adoption
1 hello world
1 401 error

I've never heard of dfinity but guarantee it will outperform a coin that went nowhere

[Anonymous No.25935746]

>>25935602
You are the one that linked the thread saying you won the argument, and I feel like I said all I needed to say there. I'll link it myself in the future if any cost arguments come up and since you clearly BTFOd me that ought to be fine with you. Since you won the argument.

[Anonymous No.25935766]

>>25935710
>4 YEARS
YOU HAD 4 YEARS NOILER FAGGOT
1$ STABLECOIN
SOON 100$ STABLECOIN
THEN 1000$ STABLECOIN
THEN DIGITAL OIL 11490$ SINGULARITY

[Anonymous No.25935816]

>>25935766
SEE SATOSHI IN THE BACK LEFT OF THE PICTURE?
HE KNOWS
HE IS WATCHING IEXEC FROM THE SHADOWS
HE WILL POUR 1M BTC INTO RLC

[Anonymous No.25935986]

DOTB SOON

[Anonymous No.25936029]

>>25935746
bro you literally have only one fucking argument which isn't even helping your case much which is bulk buying, you are welcome to argue that dfinity might become cheaper than RLC if you provide OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION FOR YOUR CLAIMS

WHICH IS MISSING

provide objective justification for your claims right now, without pointing only to muh marginal costs

you have to prove why it will be cheaper, since we said maintenance, broken hardware, expensive employees, security guards, cleaning crew, inflation of everything, infrastructure, cooling, land costs, legal costs will ultimately raise the price of dfinity over RLC

provide justification for your claims, detailed here

otherwise gtfo, you btfo'd nigger

[Anonymous No.25936111]

>>25935704
nah he's appreciating us man, he just says we're top high iq compared to plebs
>>25935673
cheers mate

[Anonymous No.25936125]

CAN WE GET SOME MORE FUCKIN MEMES NIGGERS?
SINCE WE'RE STILL AT 1$ MAYBE OUR MEME MAGIC ISN'T POWERFUL ENOUGH?
LETS CONTRIBUTE

I HAVE A LOT ILL POST A FEW

[Anonymous No.25936167]

>>25936029
Seethe. Anyone that isn't a retard can click the link and make up their own minds.

[Anonymous No.25936179]

>>25936029
he actsl ike you can't bulk buy anywhere and connect it to iExec kek, thats what i will do in the future when I run my own AI FARM KEK!

[Anonymous No.25936209]

>>25936167

[Anonymous No.25936234]

>>25936167
i literally transcribed the contents of the thread here, which you concluded with

"i guess we'll let the market decide"

you have no arguments
you cannot prove you're right
you are unable to justify a position of truth

kys

[Anonymous No.25936264]

>>25936234
see >>25936167

[Anonymous No.25936285]

>>25936125

[Anonymous No.25936300]

>>25936264
dude you are going to fud yourself out of the next 100x minimum
do you not understand decentralized economies of scale?

[Anonymous No.25936330]

>>25936300
how about you define decentralized economieS of scale

[Anonymous No.25936404]

>>25925117
Pic related is all you need to know about RLC.

[Anonymous No.25936424]

HOW MANY RLC DO I NEED TO MAKE NOILERS SEETHE IN THE FUTURE?

[Anonymous No.25936465]

>>25936264
by now you have 5 replies where you avoid giving a direct answer to justify your claims, instead you're linking to a thread where there are no more claims than you provided here

coward

kys

[Anonymous No.25936466]

>>25936404
kek saved

[Anonymous No.25936507]

>>25936404
based

[Anonymous No.25936515]

>>25936465
see >>25936264

[Anonymous No.25936519]

>>25936424
870 suicide stack

[Anonymous No.25936611]

>>25936466
you are given the unique opportunity to redeem yourself in front of this crowd where you're humiliated to death

provide proof for your claims
gtfo

kys

[Anonymous No.25936641]

>>25936611
You seem stable and well adjusted.

[Anonymous No.25936647]

>>25936519
thank you! so with that kind of money I can buy nice clothes and car and say NANANANANA to all the Noilers? And the Noilers be like "oooohh noooo that dude has got nice clothes and a car because he bought RLC early and I didn't listen now I am going to buy a rope and hang myself because I can't deal with the pain of the missed oppportunity when every anon was telling me RLC would moon"?

[Anonymous No.25936664]

>>25932542
rlc is like that "useless" magic card that destroys the whole meta eventually from finding a really weird utility it's just a matter of time...

[Anonymous No.25936744]

>>25936515
still a fucking retard without arguments for his claims

resorts to ad hominem and tu quoque

see pic related for full list of ways to avoid the truth

kys

[Anonymous No.25936779]

>>25936664
like sending emails without knowing the address, absolutely mindblowing tech

[Anonymous No.25936789]

>>25936744
meant for >>25936641
ad hominem and tu quoque instead of providing proof for his claims

retarded nigger tries to prove his shit doesn't stink but fails miserably

kys

[Anonymous No.25936823]

>>25936744
>ad hominem and tu quoque
ok reddit

[Anonymous No.25936827]

>btc goes down
>rlc goes down harder
>btc crabs
>rlc goes up a little
>btc goes up
>rlc dumps again

HAHAHAHAHAHA

UNIRONIC DIGITAL DOGSHIT, PEOPLE PANIC DUMP WHEN BTC DUMPS AND PEOPLE DUMP IT TO FOMO INTO BTC

IT'S A FUCKING STABLECOIN

[Anonymous No.25936834]

>>25936330
>infinite decentralized marketplaces participated in by anyone from the smallest to the biggest supplier, bulk buyers and enthusiasts, all competing and participating.
>it's basically the effect of economy of scale but multiplied due to being able to cooperate and compete in a trustless manner

[Anonymous No.25936855]

>>25936779
yes if you like privacy!

[Anonymous No.25936906]

>>25936779
pitiful personal incredulity

retard

kys

[Anonymous No.25936917]

>>25932586
RLC is great because it'll always go back to 1 dollar. Is it at a dollar? Buy and in 2 weeks it'll probably climb to 1.20 and you can sell with a nice profit, then wait for the dump back to 95 cents and buy in, then sell at 1.30 a month later. It just swings back and forth between 70-180 cents.

[Anonymous No.25936936]

>>25936834
>pitiful personal incredulity

[Anonymous No.25936948]

>>25936855
The secret email thing is amazing
1) it shows one of the only examples of acrypto utility working
2) it shows it can solve a data privacy problem
3) it shows potential for new technologies
4) it shows how easily iEXec is used ont he backend

[Anonymous No.25937106]

>>25936936
>>25936823
thank you for proving me right yet again and again that you are a fucking retard with no objective arguments to back up your ludicrous claims

resorts to ok reddit and fedora posting in fear of being crushed to death by the truth

pic related, it's you when you're building your own PC to hop on the RLC network when one RLC=$1000

kys

[Anonymous No.25937115]

>>25935449
Are you actually this retarded?

You're just spreading the overhead costs over thousands of machines that run at a lower efficiency, the factory scale is always better and on a large scale down cheaper hence why factories exist you fucking low IQ mongoloid lmfao.

[Anonymous No.25937174]

>>25937106
Do you have any objective arguments to back that up?

[Anonymous No.25937267]

>>25937115
thank you kek, I tried to explain it so many times

[Anonymous No.25937269]

>>25935704
The link looks really cool, Anon. Can this type of stuff be used to share real addresses in a secure way and prevent leaks like the one that happened with ledger? Or is that impossible?

[Anonymous No.25937295]

>>25937115
>hence why factories exist
>decentralized factories have never existed until now
STAY POOR NOILER

[Anonymous No.25937345]

>>25937269
I don't see why not?
That sounds like a deterministic problem which iExec can solve
Basically there's no need to store data for menial tasks

[Anonymous No.25937366]

>>25937115
lmao you fucking inbred homunculus should explain how a factory with expenses can be cheaper than thousands of machines which run together to provide task execution computing, which is irrespective of efficiency since they add together, thus efficiency is maximised while costs are minimal

kys as well
(unless you can provide compelling evidence you're right)

[Anonymous No.25937418]

>>25937174
>>25937267
>>25937115

you just found an idiot friend to keep you company, it's like dumb and dumber

kys both

[Anonymous No.25937469]

>>25937366
Based. They have no clue what a decentralized factory like iexec even entails