WILL SATOSHI BE THE WORLS FIRST TRILLIONAIRE?

[Anonymous No.25555084]

[Anonymous No.25555108]

>>25555084
no

[Anonymous No.25555136]

>>25555084
Satoshi = the NSA you stupid newfag

[Anonymous No.25555137]

>>25555084
dead people dont count, i guess

[Anonymous No.25555141]

>>25555084
>what a central bank owners
retard

[Anonymous No.25555232]

Vitalik will

[Anonymous No.25555536]

>>25555141
Is that a person?

[Anonymous No.25555898]

>>25555084
This dude is unironically smart and wholesome.

[Anonymous No.25556275]

>>25555084

God bless y'all, Sergeant Kenichi Jackson is m'name, and I beg y'all pardon.

I'm a 27 year old Japanese Confederate (Rebel, for y'all carpetbaggers). I play banjo and the fife, and spend m'days p'fecting my rebel yell and tending to my cottonfield.

I train wif m'musket every day, this superior weapon can make a dam' mess of y'all Yankee guts if ya had some because it is far superior to the smoothbore. I earned my Bowie knife license two years ago and I have been getting better every day.

I speak southern fluently, both Alabama and the Carolina dialect, and I curse the northern agressors fluently as well. I know everything about the states' rights and the three fifths' compromise, which I follow 100%.

When I graduate from Westpoint, I am going to join the army of Northern Virginia and cross the Potomac river to attack McClelland from the rear. I hope that by swift action in the Shenandoah river valley we can engage the Union armies from reinforcing the offensive against Richmond.

I own several bottles of moonshine, which I drink before breakfast to bolster my ferocity. I want to get used to killing that yankee soldier, otherwise we'll be crushed beneath the tyrant's heel and our rights shall be denied us.

Wish me luck in the Lost Cause!

[Anonymous No.25556334]

>>25555084
That's not Nicholas van Saberhagen

[Anonymous No.25556391]

Satoshi can't ever move those coins without tanking the price, so no.

[Anonymous No.25556727]

>>25556391
he could provide a signature proving ownership and get a loan that buys him a country on that easily.

[Anonymous No.25556822]

>>25556727
Anyone willing to give someone a loan secured with coins that they can't liquidate is a retard

[Anonymous No.25556863]

>>25555536
yes, central b. owen

[Anonymous No.25556891]

>>25556391
btw there is a way for him to "cash out"
start moving later coins 50 each time with a few weeks interval everyone will speculate someone with a q-computer simply broke the p2pk scripts. there would be a mass exodus to more quantum resistant addresses potentially taproot and people would stop reusing their old address.
but the price wouldn't tank because coin supply wouldn't change in any meaningful way in a given timeframe.

[Anonymous No.25556896]

>>25555084
My sources state that satoshi will sell at exactly 100k do with this as you will

[Anonymous No.25556938]

>>25556822
maybe he would only get a small fraction like 1% as loan. still more than enough.

[Anonymous No.25556990]

>>25555136
>NSA
>Satoshi immutably and intrinsically linked with British Cypherpunk community

Ok.

[Anonymous No.25557037]

>>25555084
>just use your credit card and sell your bitcoin to pay it off
-satoshi nakomoto

[Anonymous No.25557052]

>>25555084
satoshi yes, this faggot no

[Anonymous No.25557162]

>>25556891
>>25556938
and of course the 3rd method of cashing out is simply laying out a plan in public with a signed message. detailing the exact schedule of the coins sell which would happen by limit orders 10.000 coins every $1000 dollars up in price.

wouldn't really tank shit if nobody expected satoshi to market sell. the daily traded volume is magnitudes bigger than that.

[Anonymous No.25557416]

>>25555136
Satoshi=Hal Finney

[Anonymous No.25557420]

>>25556334
It's charlie lite of litecoin fame

[Anonymous No.25557466]

>>25556990
>the nsa cant infiltrate a british emailing list
big brain take

[Anonymous No.25557473]

>>25557052
this faggot probably has enough bitcoins so that his descendants all live like royalty

[Anonymous No.25557542]

>>25555084
She might be. Do you think she will every tell us all who she is?

[Anonymous No.25557586]

>>25556891
Its not about him tanking the price because of the number of new coins on the market although I can see how it could be interpreted as that. It would tank because satoshi coins moving scares the shit out of people

[Anonymous No.25557602]

>>25557542
doubt it what would be the point?

[Anonymous No.25557643]

>>25557586
dunno i can totally see people making a jubilant sport of breaking the "satoshi walls"
5% of total supply is not scary at all unless it's market dumped at once.

[Anonymous No.25557696]

>>25555084
satoshi can't actually realize any of the profits from his coins, even assuming he's alive and has the keys. There isn't enough liquidity to cash out over a million BTC.

[Anonymous No.25557757]

>>25557696
what do you mean? he could sell it to grayscale otc in a heartbeat.

[Anonymous No.25557800]

>>25556990
Yeah it’s more likely MI6

[Anonymous No.25557806]

>>25557757
>reveal yourself as satoshi
>gets tortured like a POW in vietnam the next day

[Anonymous No.25557863]

>>25557806
yeah grayscale would totally do that instead of buying 1 million btc for say $10.000 each

[Anonymous No.25557867]

>>25555136
Boring

[Anonymous No.25557886]

>>25557806
I'm honestly surprised that likely candidates for Satoshi like Adam Back haven't been kidnapped by the mafia

[Anonymous No.25557923]

>>25557863
ahhhh it hurts, pls you need to go back

[Anonymous No.25558026]

Why did they kill him bros?
Did they remove him because he owned too much?

[Anonymous No.25558054]

>>25557923
just grow a braincell you will understand...
satoshi can prove his identity without revealing himself. he can make an otc deal with any fund he chooses to. or a nation state whatever. he can even hide behind a line of trustees or lawyers.

[Anonymous No.25558309]

>>25555084
Yes
And it will be epic

[Anonymous No.25558326]

>>25557886
it was not him but good point i wouldn't sleep so well if i was him.
but any old bitcoin dev is a suspect for a hefty trove himself.

[Anonymous No.25558369]

>>25558054
Pic related

[Anonymous No.25558398]

>>25558326
IMO he's the most likely candidate, but like you said, that doesn't really matter. For any of the likely people, there's a good enough chance that they might be SN that organized crime or another group like that would try to kidnap them and torture them into giving up the keys.

[Anonymous No.25558447]

>>25558326
Why not him?
All the other candidates so far are a stretch
Imo though it was probably at least him AND hal finney was in on it

[Anonymous No.25558453]

>>25558369
i don't belive in this nonsense anymore.
last time i thought btc will be good for actual purchases and can take over the stupid credit card market was in 2012.
i didn't know shit about the economy and money back then. i actually listened to the idiot gold bugs and crap.

[Anonymous No.25558498]

>>25558398
and there is no way you can ever prove you are not satoshi. so yeah shit is bad.
>>25558447
adam back is the grandfather of bitcoin but not satoshi.

[Anonymous No.25558515]

>>25558026
Probably faked his death and works for the glowies now

[Anonymous No.25558554]

>>25558453
You believed it when infrastructure was nonexistent and the price was a few dollars but not when we have a lightning network and institutional investors are buying in and the price is closer to $100k than ever?

[Anonymous No.25558627]

>>25558515
Didn't he reveal that he had ALS long before BTC was ever a thing? I doubt it was planned like that.

>>25558447
It's also possible that Finney alone was Satoshi. Although I still think Back alone is the guy. Isn't he the only major player who (allegedly) corresponded directly with SN that has never been able to prove any correspondence? Makes sense if they're the same person.

[Anonymous No.25558634]

>>25558498
Yeah but why do you think that?

[Anonymous No.25558712]

>>25558026
you'd have to ask Craig.

[Anonymous No.25558741]

>>25558627
Bring me pictures of spiderman!!

[Anonymous No.25558764]

>>25558554
yup because i don't think the obstacles are technical. i'm a dev i know technical shit can be overcome easily. we could have progressed so far the past 10 years... but the obstacles are different in nature. it's more of a social legal and economic problem.

bitcoin can't be money.

[Anonymous No.25558835]

>>25558634
brb we eating now

[Anonymous No.25559008]

>>25557416
And Adam Back. The two behind btc. Adam was Satoshi on the forums. The Satoshi name came from Hal. Why do you think Adam Back is the CEO of Blockstream?

[Anonymous No.25559155]

>>25558764
I'd have to disagree
Bitcoin is not your typical technological problem, it's more a solution to a consensus problem
A tradition or consensus gains MORE value the longer and steadier it has been working as opposed to technologies which obsolesce with time

Bitcoin is working fine on the base layer and it's not like it isn't getting better, stuff like taproot is gonna be based and it's ready to go
I don't think the blockchain was necessarily going to scale and grow in adoption at the same time, even hal finney predicted this
It leaves the growing protocol too open to attacks
Buy probably after this year or by 2023 the hashrate and buildout of the network will be sufficiently adopted to bring in more needed changes

[Anonymous No.25559275]

>>25555084
No because there already are trillionaires.

[Anonymous No.25559479]

>>25556391
Those coins were mined to stabilize the network and increase the difficulty to attack it.

[Anonymous No.25559543]

>>25559155
that's what i meant technical problems like tps are trivial to overcome. that's not why bitcoin never gonna be money.

[Anonymous No.25559678]

>>25558634
so obviously i can't prove adam is not satoshi just like i can't prove craig is not satoshi even tho that shit is pretty god damn evident.

but the way adam inserted himself to the attention and the development so eager to somehow profit from his invention (hashcash) of which only an open protocol adopted that can not be ripped off for royalties is pretty telling for me.

bitcoin had 4 grandfathers and 1 father.
hal finney, adam back, wei dai and nick szabo
but satoshi was none of them. we don't know his name because he never wanted us to know his name.

[Anonymous No.25559856]

>>25559543
They're not trivial on a blockchain though, they're a main concern
The other issue is whether you'd want to spend your bitcoins for coffee at all given its deflationary nature
Overall I see it as a small problem in terms of how the point is that you won't need to cash out your bitcoins into dollars
The end goal was always reserve currency status just some people could see and believed, and others didn't

[Anonymous No.25559893]

>>25558764
oh and i meant the progress as a broad term as a civilization and how we pay for shit. the past 10 years almost nothing has changed. we are still using the same shitbrained technology that is credit cards the only change is they are now all nf cards. but it's still a fucking mess of a trusted authority bollocks and it's still insecure as fuck.

web payments recently started to get more secure. the one thing i can say very recently "improved" is the way you purchase online with a card. it's still crap of course but at least you have now 2 factor authentication at your own bank for authorizing a payment. it could still be miles better with proper application of cryptography and decent protocols. but https is something i will take it against cvv code.

it's a fucking disgrace all of it.

[Anonymous No.25560009]

>>25559856
>They're not trivial on a blockchain though, they're a main concern
you don't have to tell me m8 i have been educating retarded cashies and shitcoiners about this for years and years.
bitcoin can scale exponentially easily. the potential in taproot is also mindblowing.

but that all doesn't matter. i know that now.

i could pay for shit in a store with bitcoins already. but there are no stores that would accept it in my country whatsoever. but even if there were i would have to pay like 5% premium instead of getting 3% cashback. nah...

[Anonymous No.25560193]

>>25559893
sounds to me like your mind is set on something just because of what you experianced in the last 10 years but that doesn't make your opinions on bitcoin true

[Anonymous No.25560402]

>>25560193
i could be wrong. i would be happy to be wrong. but i understood a lot in the past years. and it all fits together. the most important reason why bitcoin can't be money is the supply curve. the other is legality.

so my expectations of bitcoin shifted. everybodies expectations shifted. the narrative changed a lot more than the protocol in the past 10 years lol.

[Anonymous No.25560690]

>>25555084
Yes

[Anonymous No.25560799]

>>25560402
well, wether or not bitcoin will ever go so far as to replace fiat is uncertain. Perhaps it will only be "digital gold" but what I can say with adequate certainty is that crypto currency will dominate Fiat in the future

[Anonymous No.25560989]

>>25560000
yowie

[Anonymous No.25561135]

>>25560799
only? man... aside from constantly raging about how stupid credit cards are (can't help it security and cryptography was my hobby since 12yo) they work really fucking well.
the problem of buying coffee does not exist if you can afford it. it's not something crypto _has_ to solve lmao.

confiscation of wealth through thievery or inflation was a problem that needed a solution. the problem that trust will always get betrayed in the end needed a solution. and bitcoin fucking solved it. i fucking love bitcoin. i don't give a fuck about the rest.
also don't call bitcoin digital gold because it's light years better than gold.

[Anonymous No.25561275]

>>25561135
Hedge against centralized inflation. Thats Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.25561354]

>>25559008
Pretty sure it's not Adam Back.
He's a smart dude, but Satoshi's scaling strategy was to increase the block size.
He was explicitly okay with mega server farms taking over as long as they could process nano transactions.
Satoshi definitely would not be a cashie either. He said hash power decides which fork is legit, not throughput.
Satoshi approved of alts, but would never accept two forks calling themselve's bitcoin.

I'm absolutely sure Satoshi walked away because he was dying. Poor Hal probably lost his own pvt keys due to ALS crippling him out of the blue.

Adam Back hates alts, not even innovative ones that are attempting to expand beyond bitcoin's use case, that are adding value to the network effect.

[Anonymous No.25561460]

sn =sn

[Anonymous No.25561505]

>>25555084
He’s dead dude

[Anonymous No.25562264]

>>25561505
You fell for it

[Anonymous No.25562410]

Satoshi nakamoto is Sergey nazarov
He is finding and buying back chainlink with his secret bitcoin stash. Why do you think link is mooning. Biz noticed this so we bought in. Sergey will keep buying back chainlink tokens until his company can buy all the Big Macs in this world. And when that happens. SERGEY WILL BE THE FATTEST FUCK OF THEM ALL!!

[Anonymous No.25562654]

How many coins does he have ?

[Anonymous No.25562913]

>>25555084
newfag kys

[Anonymous No.25563075]

>>25556990
>doesn’t know the US has a fuckton of TOR nodes
You don’t even know what you hold