you wont regret it

[Anonymous No.25119245]

it was a scam wasnt it.
i sold everything last week such a shit project.
Digital oil.... what was i thinking :(

[Anonymous No.25119303]

>>25119245
yes my dude its over. when the cumskin chico crypto shilled this coin i had thought for a second we would have a nice uptrend to at least 3 but i was very wrong

[Anonymous No.25119518]

>>25119245
>Sound familiar? Let’s take a look back at the demo iExec has showcased at Mobile World Congress 2019, at the Intel® booth. In short, it is not just a demo proving we can align with a lot of buzz words, it is an illustration of how 2 delivery robots can use 5G to request help thanks to a blockchain-based marketplace. And here, the Zero trust approach lives through 1. hardware encryption, 2. blockchain, and 3. secure off-chain computing.
>So if this tech is taking the lead in the non-blockchain world, what about the blockchain world? A lot has happened in 2020. On the structural side, layer 2 technologies are becoming further tested and increasingly efficient. More benchmarks are compared to illustrate their benefits and limits. On the application side, DeFi has excited a lot of crypto fans. Was it thanks to its potential or thanks to Japanese cuisine inspired projects going to the moon?
>The coming years will answer this question. But it is clear that DeFi has created interest from a wide range of profiles including governments and financial institutions. Here, iExec has again illustrated how its stack will help this sector. iExec went further in receiving regulatory approval, from AMF, the french SEC, for its Enterprise marketplace Token Swap Offering. This first world-first approval is not just a great indicator that places the decentralized scene closer to the classic industries, but it also has a strong position in the complex but key trend of RegTech. The technologies of Regulation will surely frame a lot of our hopes and uses in our increasingly digital life over the coming years.
>So in summary, iExec has been blessed to have invested its time and resources in solutions proving to be more needed to a wide range of actors. 2020 has been an intense year for a lot of industries, and we are thrilled to start in 2021, ready to conquer clients and growing markets.

[Anonymous No.25119540]

https://medium.com/iex-ec/test-ec3c2b419cc0

All I can say is that the Iexec team is talking a lot of shit about how Iexec is going TO ZEE MOON in 2021 for a project that, according to fudders on /biz/ is going to 0 and a scam. Unironically Gilles would have been better off just fucking rugpulling in 2018 if it was an actual unironic rugpull. I guess you can speculate that not all scammers are smart enough to run off with the money at the best possible time, but why would the Iexec team be so bullish about an imminent mooning from Intel and Microsoft if literally nothing is happening ever and it's 100% over?

[Anonymous No.25119553]

>>25119540
the team has millions upon millions of ico funds, they can afford to play around and fuck around for years longer than you can cope

[Anonymous No.25119584]

>>25119245
DIGITAL OIL WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

[Anonymous No.25119643]

>>25119553
You seem very interested in the idea of us selling our RLC. See that's the thing about /biz/, when a project is dead why do you fucking care if I hold to zero or not? I've got other shit going on, RLC isn't my only investment. So why do you fucking care what I do with my money in this one case.

>inb4 "i-i don't care I'm just here to laugh at you"

Okay cool beans? There's like 10~ frequent RLC posters on /biz/, not a big community to shit on like GRT.

[Anonymous No.25119794]

>>25119643

if you were "diversified" as you claim than you and the other cave dwellers in the rlc camp. would not be making threads about this everday. the fact of the matter is that you overplayed your hand and have to remind us everyday about it.

the more you europoors shit up biz with rlc threats the more irrate. its simple as that. i dont care enough about you to make you want to sell or buy iexec. do as you please but stop telling me everday about it.

[Anonymous No.25119854]

>>25119794
>people aren't allowed to make threads

Why do XRP threads exist then? You're very upset that I own this coin, faggot.

>rlc threats the more irrate

Kek, fudders are unironic fucking pajeets.

[Anonymous No.25119895]

>>25119854
its 3.34 am and im not going to bother to proofread what i write. your dumb bag holding ass is going to have to take what you get. XRP threads are at least put into one general thread. make a general thread about rlc that would make things better for the board. however it wont change the fact that you got scammed by other people in your white-run crypto project.

[Anonymous No.25119921]

is it really about oil? why the fuck would i want that

[Anonymous No.25119945]

>>25119245
I’ve been watching this for a while knowing it’s a solid project just waiting for a good time to buy in. Now feels like that time. I’m just so fucking lazy, moving funds is a hassle.

[Anonymous No.25120023]

>>25119895
Tiresome post. If it means nothing to you, then fuck off. You don't fuck off because you've got some autistic temper trantrum about this one coin.

>make a general

Why don't you go ask -literally any other coin- to do that, fag? This is besides the fact that this is literally an anti-RLC thread telling people to sell and has fucking nothing to do with people who think it's a good project, you gay motherfucker.

>continues to fail at capitalization and generally be zero IQ and a newfag

Reddit is much more welcoming to your type, nigger.

[Anonymous No.25120280]

>>25120023
you and i cant win anon. what you do with your finances is up to you but oppurtunites in this space are endless. i learned the hard way that opportunity cost is far more powerful than bag holding things that are really not meant to be what they are.

i just want to share one thing though before i call it quits. the lead developer of iexec formally resigned from his position on devember 19th,https://twitter.com/Amxx/status/1340372039060877314

odds are that if the project aimed to be the next big thing and that things were going smoothly behind the scenes then this would not happen.

[Anonymous No.25120310]

>>25119945
You're not gonna be able to catch these levels for long, I would move fast on at least securing a make-it stack while they are on Christmas discount.

[Anonymous No.25120354]

>>25119945
I'm not fucking selling, noiler niggers. Noilergs.

[Anonymous No.25120588]

[Anonymous No.25120628]

>>25120280
Everyone already knew that, nigger. The new fud is about blair saying there's no alibaba or google partnerships. Try to keep up with the news.

[Anonymous No.25120643]

>>25120310
You shouldn't try to trick people, BTC will go down over the next 7 days and only rebound in january. If BTC dumps to 21k, RLC will dump to 49 cents. People should be waiting for these cheapies.

[Anonymous No.25120790]

>>25119895
>white-run
Oh it's the seething subhuman shitskin again. Your kind will be exterminated in the next decade.

[Anonymous No.25120821]

>>25120280
Hadrien literally is not the lead developer you lying nigger. Why not just say the truth instead of twisting fact slightly?

[Anonymous No.25120895]

im rather comfy bros

[Anonymous No.25120904]

>>25119895
>its 3.34 am and im not going to bother to proofread what i write.
>needing to proof-read your fucking 4chan posts
Just reinforcing his point about you being a fucking pajeet third-worlder or a sub 90 IQ retard. Native English speakers don't need to fucking proofread simple posts to not sound like pajeets, and most of Europe has good enough education that they don't either.

[Anonymous No.25120909]

>>25120821
They want it lower but this is unironically the last dip

[Anonymous No.25121262]

GUYS TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS THREAD;

>>25119902

I KNOW WHY BLAIR WAS FUDDING HIS PROJECT IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW! FIRST THEY WANT A US LEGAL OPINION TO ENTER THE MARKETS, BUT AS SOON AS YOU DISPLAY INTENT OF PRICE APPRECIATION OF YOUR TOKEN YOUR TOKEN WILL BE DEEMED A SECURITY AND YOU HAVE TO APPLY AS A SECURITY AND ADHERE TO STRICT LAWS. AS A UTILITY TOKEN THIS IS NOT THE CASE. SO OFCOURSE BLAIR IS NOT GOING TO FUEL OUR HOPIUM!!! it all makes sense now, don't expect moontalk from iExec team!

[Anonymous No.25121288]

>>25121262
no shit retard

[Anonymous No.25121334]

>>25121288
what you already knew that? I thought I was the first and only one who knew :(

[Anonymous No.25121378]

>>25119245
>Invest in project where the developers are majority non-easterneuropean/russian.
anon don't be retarded, racial profiling should be the foundation of all investment decisions, and iExec is french.. need i say more.

[Anonymous No.25121456]

>>25121262
why not just link the comment you fucking homo wasting my time

[Anonymous No.25121460]

>>25121334
of course they wont say anything

[Anonymous No.25121542]

>>25121456
I don't know how to crosspost, please don t be bully :(

>>25121460
well it never occured to me, but now it all makes sense, these are geniuses, not unlike that retard Garlinghouse. I now know they were most likely advised by their legal team to avoid moontalk.

[Anonymous No.25121682]

>>25120904
Kek keep coping retard how much money have you lost? Post some juicy PNL porn

[Anonymous No.25121929]

>>25120821
>>25120909
No, RLC doesn't have enough speculation pump power right now. BTC will fall and that'll be the last RLC dip of significance before it blows up in february.

[Anonymous No.25121980]

>>25121262
>>25121542
>never occurred to me

RLC is being run as a business not a charity for neet retards to get rich. But if a few thousand of my dollars turn into a few million in 5-10 years I'm not going to be complaining, but I see why they'd keep things strictly business rather than trying to convince people their token will "make you a bazillionaire". Ironically telling moonbois to fuck off is actually bullish, from the perspective that adoption is a necessity to growth rather than retards spamming the token everywhere. We're unironically in an "IYKYK" phase, where hypebeast moonboys are shaken out.

[Anonymous No.25122005]

>>25121980
this is one of those high IQ tests then, I also remain bullish, thinking about putting in an extra 100 dollars in this thing

[Anonymous No.25122112]

>>25122005
In particular you can compare RLC to Lition, another token people thought would go places. But Lition did an unironic exit pump before Richard sold it to Tomochain. Why would Iexec devs deliberately say things that would cause the price to go down, if they plan on exit scamming? Doesn't make sense from a normal scammer perspective. The only realm it makes sense is if their goal is not to have the entire thing blow up before eRLC public offerings.

[Anonymous No.25122167]

>>25121542
press the comment number and copy paste. fresh off the boat from reddit?

[Anonymous No.25122185]

>>25119540
To keep the scam of dumping on retards alive for as long as possible kek

[Anonymous No.25122202]

>>25122112
>you can compare RLC to Lition,
No, you cant.

[Anonymous No.25122262]

>>25119245
Same :(

[Anonymous No.25122277]

>>25121980
Retard missing the point as usual.
Noone wants marketing to have the new link marines/xrp army, the goal is to have ethdevs integrate iexec in their shits so it becomes a standard.

Right now they're shit at being adopted.

[Anonymous No.25122314]

>RLC/BTC

Hahahaha eat shit faggots and stop shitting up our board with this pajeet teir dead shitcoin

[Anonymous No.25122335]

>>25121542
>"they were most likely advised by their legal team to avoid moontalk"
>Literally tweeted about "world domination" 4 months ago
Stupid nigger spinning incompetence as 2689D chess. No wonder they're complacent with deluded shit eaters like you.

[Anonymous No.25122392]

>>25122167
thanks! actually I am an oldfag but never cross posted before, this was my first time, be gentle

[Anonymous No.25122433]

>>25122335
lol thanks anon, I am not even in their TG but okay. There is a subtle difference though between aiming for world domination with your project and trying to inflate the token price through speculation, the first does not deem it a security from a US legal point of view, the latter does.

[Anonymous No.25122439]

>>25122277
>ethdevs

No.

[Anonymous No.25122468]

>>25122167
thanks!

[Anonymous No.25122938]

>>25122439
Yes.

[Anonymous No.25123061]

>>25122335
Unironically in what world is it a good thing to have moonbois anyway? We 'know what we have' but I don't want to share space with zero IQ pajeets who will sell at 2 dollars because that's a lot of money for them. Moonbois are dumb.

[Anonymous No.25123610]

Glad to see that they care about transparency and communication. They want us happy.
It's over.