/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.24820082]

Is China using Karl Marx's theories of economics to get ahead?

[Anonymous No.24820115]

>>24820082
why exactly do you think that?

[Anonymous No.24820985]

>>24820115
because of the hammer and sickle everywhere

[Anonymous No.24821010]

>>24820985
they just couldn't be bothered to change it, but it doesn't mean shit at this point, if they are communist then sweden is anarcho-capitalist

[Anonymous No.24821156]

China is fascist, aka capitalist economy under the supervision of a nationalist dictatorship.
If a billionaire actions enter in conflict with ethno nationalist interests then he "disappears".
That's why it's so succesful by the way

Communism never works because it's just not efficient to have the state micromanage the economy, you're better off letting companies go through business cycles and cutting heads once it reached a certain size.

Typically in the US Bezos would be sent into "retirement" or hanged then replaced by some other guy controlled by the fascist party. Amazon would keep operating as usual but you would never see them shilling for mass immigration or BLM/trannies.

[Anonymous No.24821238]

>>24821156
Communism isn't state controlled, it's worker controlled.

[Anonymous No.24821252]

>>24821238
Please leave this board

[Anonymous No.24821276]

>>24821238
That's the reason it is an utopia.

[Anonymous No.24821280]

>>24820082
kek, they teach it in school but are more capitalist than the west in some ways
no taxes on stock market or capital gains
landlord unironically the best you can do

only difference is they have government stimuli to certain sectors and don't need democratic approval to do it, hence lots of corruption but also lots of growth

Their main growth mechanism has been printing Yuan to peg it at sub-dollar value, which made exports to US and other countries a never-ending well of productivity for them.

[Anonymous No.24821405]

>>24820985
hammer and sickle was stamped on this coin aswell but the average sowjet pleb couldnt even dream of getting there hands on one.
Sowjet commies sold those to capitalist west in order to exchange it for much needed technology and currency.

[Anonymous No.24821442]

>>24821238
Not a single communist regime ever transitioned to its "stateless and classless" phase and we're past 100 years of attempts.
It's simply not in human nature (humans are territorials and seek dominance) and how societies organize themselves (individuals are fundamentally inequal so a hierarchy always emerges given enough time).

No amount of automation and post scarcity magic thinking will ever change that, maybe if you biologically engineered/cybernetize humans to become some hive mind you could achieve it but the end result wouldn't really belong to our species.

[Anonymous No.24821463]

>>24821010
>>24821156
>>24821238
>>24821276
>>24821280
slaves defending slavery

[Anonymous No.24821481]

>>24821463
amerimutt defending retardation

[Anonymous No.24821496]

>>24821481
>I want to be owned by the government
kys

[Anonymous No.24821512]

>>24821496
imagine being such a fucking golem that you're that irritated at people saying china isn't communist

[Anonymous No.24821538]

>>24821512
imagine thinking there is anyone that believes anyone but a slave chinese shill is posting the chinese communist party isn't communist

[Anonymous No.24821539]

>>24820082
they mixed hitler's national socialism with mussolini's fascism, made it into chink flavor, result is a ruthless nationalist capitalism with no regard for citizen's freedom

[Anonymous No.24821559]

>>24821238
No. Communism is some schizophrenic thing where they basically abolish literally everything and expect it all to work out. It was literally defined by Marx as a negation of Capitalism in every way, making Communism defined by what it isn't instead of what it is. This makes no fucking practical sense and it means that Communists that know what they're talking about have no other practical goals than abolishing Capitalism. They have no real desire to make the world a better place, in fact many do not believe the concepts of good and bad are real in any meaningful way, all they want is to abolish the current state of things.
If you're interested in worker cooperatives (I am as well) just abandon Marxism. Marxism previously just one Socialist school of thought out of many, it just came to be dominant over the years.
So dominant in fact that many simply conflate Socialism with Marxism and think it impossible that one might be a Socialist but not a Marxist.
Abandoning Marxism, while frustrating, just frees you up so much. You'll have midwits quoting Marx at you with the implication that because some long dead scholar said something you must bend your opinions to his will but the fact that you can simply tell them to fuck off and that you don't have to listen to Marx is liberating

[Anonymous No.24821563]

>>24820082
nice bait commie

[Anonymous No.24821566]

they aren't western liberals, with western liberalism having purged any kind of logic that could actually lead to marxist-type thought and socialism or communism. in that context, i am sure they are "marxist" in that sense that they aren't its opposite. which the west is. including western neoliberals and other forms of """leftists""". and they are collectivist i guess.

[Anonymous No.24821568]

>>24821538
damn you got me, i'm a chinese slave paid to shill against communism AND say communist china isn't actually communist, that makes sense anon you're right i'm found out

[Anonymous No.24821615]

>>24821568
yeah you I bet you like terminology like "state capitalism" or "stakeholder capitalism"

[Anonymous No.24821616]

>>24821566
*the west purged this logic and replaced it with various forms of mindless consumer psychology children are subject to

[Anonymous No.24821629]

>>24821566
>>24821616
**because western capitalism is a system that needs consumption to expand by necessity.

[Anonymous No.24821632]

>>24820082
the only reason they got rich is bc corrupt politicians was regarding them es developing nations allowing them to export products without for a high profit wich also incentives businesses to create their products in china. while job market began to shrink, chinas economy grew exponentially until trump came and set up a trade deal. without trump china would still be regarded as developing nation although they doing better than almost every country in the world. there you can see what led china to this success. it's not communism but the corruption within the WTO.

[Anonymous No.24821651]

>>24821629
>projecting this hard
china is fucked all they can do now is start wars and take peoples shit. Same as the nazis

capitalism allows the accumulation of wealth by citizens. Central banking and keynesian economics is not capitalism

[Anonymous No.24821683]

>>24820082
had to rewrite lol:
the only reason they got rich is bc corrupt politicians was regarding them es developing nation allowing them to export products without custom duties and sell them eventually because of low cost for enormously high profit which also incentives businesses to manufacture their products in china. while job market began to shrink, chinas economy grew exponentially until trump came and set up a trade deal for chinks. without trump china would still be regarded as developing nation and enjoy the benefits and treatment like a poor country, even though they are doing better than almost every country in the world. there you can see what led china to this success. it's not communism but the corruption within the WTO.

[Anonymous No.24821727]

>>24821683
>trump came and set up a trade deal for chinks. without trump china would still be regarded as developing nation
trade with china is decades old https://youtu.be/R4SWso7CXvk

it is naive to think it was anything but corruption to have no contingency when china did become more free
https://youtu.be/aeVrMniBjSc
and now we're going to have to face the consequences again
https://youtu.be/GcFiJwpvmq0
https://youtu.be/FR7WgKnBTIE
https://youtu.be/CEo4NNo7oaM
https://youtu.be/mOmEFOaWjI8

[Anonymous No.24821744]

>>24821727
>did become more free
didn't become more free (as was the supposed intention of the one sided trade deals)

[Anonymous No.24822492]

Who respects copyright more usa or China?

[Anonymous No.24823068]

>>24820082
No they are just shilling keynsianism on the west to get ahead.

[Anonymous No.24823094]

They just doing Lenin's New Economic Policy, but for the 21st Century.

[Anonymous No.24823099]

>>24820082
Its using national socialist economical theory to the tee. Communism only in aesthetics.

[Anonymous No.24823178]

>>24821238
Lol please kill yourself faggot, i cant take this retardation

[Anonymous No.24824143]

>>24821651
there is no capitalism without central banking, state and corporation. those 3 things literally make up capitalism

[Anonymous No.24824177]

>>24820985
get some education please for god's sake you are so fucking STUPID.

[Anonymous No.24824201]

Nah that was Mao's China, which was terrible economically. Nu China is national socialist.

[Anonymous No.24824313]

>>24820985
BASED, what's it like having such a high IQ?
>>24821010
>>24821405
>>24824177
Low IQ brainlets detected