[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 5 KB, 209x241, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404230 No.24404230 [Reply] [Original]

Are we really going to have ended the year with no development since August?

>> No.24404290

>>24404230
Sir Gay has sold more coins than usuall, thats a development.

>> No.24404309
File: 377 KB, 645x773, EGfM0dDXoAM_p5Y.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404309

>>24404230
Yep. First period in years I've felt the team has stalled/are asleep at the wheel. Let's hope next year is different.

>> No.24404327

I wanna sell but have a feeling I’ll regret it

>> No.24404337

>>24404309
Nah they've always been like this.
Remember the run-up to mainnet?

>December 2017: "we're gonna rewrite everything in Go"
>???
>May 2019: "yeah, so here's mainnet"

>> No.24404362

>>24404290
Cup of coffee. Always remember stinkers.

>> No.24404373

>>24404230
It's over. Fernando is Simeon. Ari is Blythe. Sergey is a deepfake of Rory. Once it all clicks you realize we have no chance. Sell it all. $1k EOY.

>> No.24404374

>>24404327
Definitely don't sell, the damage is already done against ETH and BTC, it can't get any worse and we're sonewhat oversold. It's just disheartening that we've had numerous outright lies about what developments we'd see this year all whist the team sells extraordinary amounts of tokens.

>> No.24404410

>>24404337
I bought spring 2018, there were slow periods but none with the mass dev selling and it was always in a generally bearish market.

>> No.24404418

>>24404374
Please do tell the lies that has been told

>> No.24404442

>>24404410
>there were slow periods
That's an understatement.
There was basically no visible development between late 2017 and mainnet.

>> No.24404472

>>24404418
Oracle integration Q3, abritrum this year, Tsigs this year, Sergey even previously suggested staking this year but that was less concrete.

>> No.24404521

>>24404230
Bulargians out in full force NEXO defo short the last few days and being raped. My kinky however stays stinky $1000 EOY

>> No.24404522

2021 was always the year

after that 2024 will be the next significant year

>> No.24404534
File: 113 KB, 633x724, notselling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404534

50 to 500 IYKYK

>> No.24404539

>>24404472
>Oracle integration Q3
That was Oracle's promise, not Chainlink's.

>abritrum this year
>Tsigs this year
>Sergey even previously suggested staking this year
Sources pls?

>> No.24404562

>>24404539
Yeah and arbitrum was arbitrum's. It's almost like OP really wants you to sell. Makes you think.

>> No.24404590 [DELETED] 

Staking by eoy.
staked.us displays staking in Q4 2020 for Link.

>> No.24404627

>>24404539
Nonetheless it's development with link. Sergey said staking later this year in some interview, t sigs i can't remember but im sure other anons can help out. I know linkpool stated it would be.

>> No.24404654

>>24404627
Here's the interview with Sergey.
https://thedefiant.substack.com/p/defi-builders-are-neglecting-data-33a

>> No.24404676

>>24404230
>since August
>he thinks there's been development this year at all
ohohohohoho nonononononono I hope you don't think a few github commits where some lines were moved around is actually 'development'

>> No.24404691

>>24404442
I literally used to live and breathe crumbs and their pivotal tracker during that time

>> No.24404714

>>24404521
API3 is actually Zeus Capital along with some trannies like astro, finrekt, chainlinkgod, and Timo Burek and Sasa.

>> No.24404727

>>24404362
not in the paper

>> No.24404759

>>24404590
Pretty sure that's just custodial 'staking' like you can do in lots of places like aave.

>> No.24404763

>>24404654
It only says "in the coming months".
That can mean anything, and doesn't specify "this year".

>>24404691
There's still a lot of that today.
But the point is there was no only actual development that was released between late 2017 and mainnet.

>> No.24404807

>>24404691
Also, there wasn't even a public pivotal or github for a good while between late 2017 and 2019.
It was absolute dead radio silence.

>> No.24404836

>>24404714
>r but im sure other anons can help out. I know linkpool stated it would be.
Sasa = API3
Timo = API3
Burek = API3
Astro = faggot

Finrekt and Chainlinkgod are still shilling LINK very hard so I doubt they're involved. Otherwise I agree, API3 was behind Zeus. They knew too much about the biz fud to just be some random eastern european faggots.

Meanwhile API3 is using VC's to fund massive shilling campaigns and always are attacking CL, gaslighting the meaning of what an oracle is and should do all in the hopes of finding enough gullible retards to buy their insanely overvalued ICO.

Remember the CLCG ICO? 200M for a cookie cutter website with API that was being resold and nobody ever used? And they didn't get any traction so they sold LINK for ETH (Timo sold his 800k stack whilst posting insanely bullish charts at the same time to dump on his twitter frens) which they then used to fake interest, but it was to no success because some biz autists immediately linked the accounts.

Well, API3 has learned from their mistake. Now they are using some twitter faggot influencers who missed out on LINK to shill them as the Chainlink killer in the hope to get a quick buck. All based on some random buzzwords, goal post moving and vapour ware called Airnodes which are essentially centralized chainlink nodes.

>> No.24404858
File: 54 KB, 640x853, z11rrMY_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404858

>>24404763
I remember following their early docs to fund a contract before mainnet. This was maybe early 2018 but beyond following the tut I have no idea desu.
>>24404807
The team (((used))) to post here to keep us updated. Radio silence on official channels sure like before they got a discord and twitter and it was just slack.

>> No.24404859

>>24404362
ctrl + f = nothing! Sad!

>> No.24404870

>>24404763
It says 'the next year' and i recall some anons got full access at the time and the questions asked was precisely what to expect within the year.

Don't get me wrong, i didn't see that as a hard promise, the quiet abandoning of oracle and no shows of arbitrum and t sigs are more painful.

>> No.24404887

>>24404759
Your pretty sure, I asked the team and they confirmed its Links staking implementation. I do not assume they would just guess the date, as they have a reputation at stake.
So its likely that its true which gives us staking in december and t-sigs in january.

>> No.24404888
File: 616 KB, 1200x1200, 1604248566598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404888

PLenty of development

>> No.24404895

>>24404309
The team has been growing immensely. They've gone from 15-20 to more than 80 (Sergey's words) and all of these new people need to be interviewed, onboarded and then given a crash course to ensure they can actually contribute to the code.

All of those integrations every single day, sometimes multiple ones, they all need preparations, planning on marketing, somebody has to write and check the announcement post, people need to follow up on the integration partners etc... Upscaling a company is a painful process and things tend to slow down at first. However, once these new people are settled the progress will be 5x faster as the team will have 5x more people working on all of the remaining problems.

>> No.24404926

>>24404870
>It says 'the next year
So 2021?

>>24404858
Not sure if we're arguing or disagreeing.
The current lack of specific development news is extremely reminiscent of the period between late 2017 and mainnet. Pretty sure we can all agree on that.

>> No.24404944

>>24404836
>finrekt and clg shill hard or go home
that's their shill side. They have a fud side too.
>eastern euro human garbage
yes they used him to do the graphics for the fud piece but the stupid retard left metadata in the file so they threw him under the bus for the lulz.
Fuck CLCG and trannies.

>> No.24404946

>>24404887
Transcript? It's a no name site, i highly doubt they have privy information or reliability. Staking will come after t-sigs and arbritrum.

>> No.24404960

>>24404888
checked
I too hold link and feel the need to fud the fuck out of it, it's literally bond villainy tech

>> No.24404977

>>24404836
What price did he sell that 800k at?

>> No.24404983

>>24404926
>The current lack of specific development news is extremely reminiscent of the period between late 2017 and mainnet. Pretty sure we can all agree on that.
I can see where this sentiment is coming from but we actually did have some development. Flux monitor is a big one (for node operators) as it has decreased costs significantly. Some of the improvements have been more back-end and were less pumpworthy, but the progress still was made. Every single issue, every single github commit that gets accepted brings us one step closer to the fabled 1.0 with staking and treshhold sigs and offchain reporting.

>> No.24404986

>>24404926
I thought we were just talking. No crumbs being posted means we're just waiting. I miss the crumbs and the potential. It's all true... but they presented in such a boring way no one gives af

>> No.24404991

>>24404895
Yes but they've been growing immensely for well over a year now with selling that suggests they should be able to operate as a transnational tech giant by now.

>>24404926
His answer makes it clear it's a 'in the year going forward' question not 'after this year'.

>> No.24404994
File: 131 KB, 1211x1043, __yazawa_nico_love_live_and_1_more_drawn_by_kurokawa_makoto__8186335c5ebfe8cc6e661bc3a28314f0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24404994

Facebook is 16 years old.
Chainlink is around three years old. You might not like this but you gotta give this thing time.

>> No.24405006

>>24404944
>They have a fud side too.
I wasn't aware. Do you have an example?
>metadata
Agreed, this was obviously planted

>>24404977
60 cents. Then it dumped to 45 cents and he went bragging on how he swinged his stack. Then binance was hacked and he got locked out of his funds for 2 weeks and link pumped back and he bought back in at a loss.

>> No.24405022

>>24405006
What a fucking idiot.

>> No.24405030

>>24404994
By this stage in FB's life every teen globally was on it. I had one and im always a hugely slow adopter of social networks.

>> No.24405035

>>24404983
Oh I agree there are actual developments, let's not forget VRF went live on mainnet a few weeks ago.
I'm referring to the actual big stuff we've all been looking out for for years now: staking, reputation, TEEs, ...

And I'm not saying it's even a bad thing that theres a relative lull in development news; just look at how mainnet turned out once it was finally released.

>>24404991
>His answer makes it clear it's a 'in the year going forward'
Not really.

>> No.24405039

>>24404230
yea trump didnt win. so the welfare cyrpto initiative ends. now people are expected to make and save money the old fashioned way and they know that inflation will screw 1/3 of americans so the economy wont do better under democrats

>> No.24405127

>>24405035
Found the interview on Spotify. The question is LITERALLY what is coming up for chainlink in the rest of the year.

Why are you being such a dishonest shill?

>> No.24405132

>>24405127
>The question is LITERALLY what is coming up for chainlink in the rest of the year.
Source?

>> No.24405144

>>24405035
>>24405127
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2vjjYpwdT12VsOCgJU7ybo?si=aulnnEFiRh2FgW9zqin8Cg

53:00

>> No.24405212

>>24405144
>>24405127
The interviewer LITERALLY says "what's coming up with Chainlink for the rest of the year, um, or in the next year".

And you're calling me a dishonest shill.

>> No.24405254
File: 140 KB, 751x791, schwabarovtweety.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405254

The real Sergey joined Twitter recently, that's a big development

>> No.24405260

>>24405212
Yeah, rest of the year or in the next year or so. Both mean this year with the latter just opening it. I don't think you're a shill, just likely ESL.

>> No.24405281
File: 155 KB, 945x1009, 1605747789569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405281

More developments at 8

>> No.24405292
File: 7 KB, 250x237, 1584235958628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405292

>>24405260
>the next year means this year

And you're calling me ESL.

>> No.24405300
File: 407 KB, 1700x1314, 1604259492720.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405300

YUGE development coming soon

>> No.24405317
File: 131 KB, 681x775, 1604973160512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405317

Stay tuned..

>> No.24405346

>>24404472
>Oracle integration Q3, abritrum this year,
this didn't come from the team
>Tsigs this year
this did and the year isn't over
>staking
in that interview he never said this year

>> No.24405374
File: 183 KB, 800x450, EfAOSHLUwAANKzI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405374

$1000 EOY

>> No.24405395

>>24405292
> rest of the year or in the next year or so
The second part refers back to the subject of the first and qualifies it. It loosens the specification in case he wants to talk about more. It is not saying what is happening next year.

Literally ESL as you're just not getting syntax. You didn't deny it either so im guessing it's true, im not having a go but you are just not quite getting the language.

>> No.24405427

>>24405395
My neck hurts just looking at your mental gymnastics.

Let me help you:
- "for the rest of the year" means the rest of 2020
- "or in the next year" means 2021

>> No.24405485

>>24405427
The other reasonable interpretation would be "in the time period of one year, starting now, on the date of this interview." It's not an explicitly defined statement and there's no way to know how Sergey understood it in the moment.
Either way, I don't see it as meaning the same thing as "until the end of this year"

>> No.24405516

>>24405485
>The other reasonable interpretation would be "in the time period of one year, starting now, on the date of this interview."
That's what poor OP is going for, and even that indeed extends into mid-2021.

But let's be honest here; when someone says "the rest of the year or in the next year", they're referring to the calendar year that starts after "the rest of the year", i.e. Jan 1st.

>> No.24405526

>>24405427
Your splitting it up to separate the sentence and syntax is willfully dishonest. I've explained the English to you, there's nothing else to say.

>> No.24405538

https://i.warosu.org/biz/thread/S21431259#p21432171

>> No.24405546

>>24405516
Yeah, that's by far the most likely interpretation.

>> No.24405569

>>24404337
Basically this, I don't understand what are these nulinkers complaining about, they don't know about the pink wojak'd autumn of 2017 and the radio silence during 2018. That was were most richfags (after link mooned this year) were forged

>> No.24405605 [DELETED] 

>>24404946
You can simply reach out to staked.us.
Why should they lie? They are once again an official link node and have been announced via links twitter.

>> No.24405609
File: 44 KB, 591x586, _20200922_100328.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405609

> If sergey, then lie.

That's all that's needed to make predictions. No swift, wells fargo, google, oracle, staking, tsigs, mixicles just feature creep and quiet dropping. The guy's a nigger.

>> No.24405628

>>24405526
Buddy, your whole thread is about how "this year" is ending. Meaning "this calendar year".
Which is what the interviewer was clearly also talking about: the rest of this calendar year, or the next calendar year.

And even according to your autistically incorrect interpretation, that gives Sergey until mid-2021.
So your "but Sergey said this year (2020)" is out either way.

Don't beat yourself up too hard over this.

>> No.24405698

>>24405628
As said i clearly explained the syntax to qualifying 'rest of the year' with 'next year or so', you've effectively conceded being ESL so there's not really anything left to say. You don't quite get it and that's fine, both the interviewers are as well so who knows.

>> No.24405700

There are new integrations announced nearly everyday. Also this spate of oracle hacks demonstrating the value of Link had been intrigueing

>> No.24405718

>>24405698
>qualifying 'rest of the year' with 'next year or so'
So she went from asking about "until December" to asking about "until May 2021"?

>> No.24405769

>>24404539
interviewer asked what's left for this year
sergey says "t-sigs which also imply staking"
so people assume staking by eoy

>> No.24405775

>>24405769
>interviewer asked what's left for this year
Where? What interviewer?

>> No.24405776

>>24404836
>>24404944
These anons know whats up. CLCG trannies have always been a stain on the link community. API3 is no different.

>> No.24405791
File: 4 KB, 165x115, b7d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24405791

>>24405775
>>24405718
>>24405628
This nigger seething

>> No.24405828

>>24405769
>t-sigs which also imply staking
That's simply not true
>In the coming months, he’s (Nazarov) most looking forward to continue supporting DeFi, increasing the number of data inputs Chainlink provides, and adding staking to better align incentives for node operators.

>> No.24405841

>>24405828
How many months in an eon?

>> No.24405848

>>24404373
Underrated schizo post

>> No.24405865

>>24405030
Wut? Facebook took off around it's sixth year wtf are you talking about?

>> No.24405971

>>24405865
> took off 2010
Literally everyone had had one for years by that point lmao. I was late to getting one and by 2014 i had already deleted it after everyone was bored of it.

>> No.24406215

>>24405317
Monitoring

>> No.24406324

>>24405971
Zoomer detected. Myspace was king until 2008 you massive faggot. FB overtook Myspace in the US in 2009. Now fuck off.

>> No.24406336

>>24405971
Heck even Hi5 was more popular than FB in 2009

>> No.24406347

>>24406324
Maybe in the US. Im UK and i had fb by 16 in 2008, i was obstinately late to the show as well. By 2010 i had started uni and it wasn't even anything new, facebook was just ubiquitous and had been for a long time.

>> No.24406417

>>24405828
And the interview was only 6 months ago. We're still well within the timeframe of 'the coming months'.
>Oh no! It's been 6 months and staking isn't here yet! Quick, sell everything!
KEK, yeh right.
Usual Fud

>> No.24406441
File: 5 KB, 265x87, link.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24406441

Link staking goes live by eoy 2020.
Source: staked.us

>> No.24406518

>>24406347
Nigger you are lying I was also in Europe and Myspace was massively more popular than FB. FB became the norm AFTER 2010 either you like it or not.

>> No.24406540

>>24406347
>By late 2007 and into 2008, Myspace was considered the leading social networking site, and consistently beat out the main competitor Facebook in traffic. Initially, the emergence of Facebook did little to diminish Myspace's popularity; at the time, Facebook was targeted only at college students.

>> No.24406599

>>24406518
>>24406540
Maybe myspace was still popular with indians and boomers, by 2008 as said not only was literally everyone in school using fb but they had been for some time. When i joined my first post was '- is finally on facebook' as the old style used to be. How long is holding out for a long time? Well for a teenager probably not as much as an adult, but it was at least a year of other people being all over it.

>> No.24406623

>>24404230
>no development since August 2017
ftfy

>> No.24406639

>>24404888
His hands are smoked. Future will be frightening.

>> No.24406680

>>24405281
Snake. SNAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE!!!!!!

>> No.24406717

>>24406599
Or maybe you are a 19 year old just pretending to know what he's talking about.

>> No.24406762

>>24404472
>Oracle integration Q3
The slide fucking said "Q3 and beyond"

>> No.24406833

>>24406762
There was another later presentation which didn't have the beyond.

>> No.24406847

>>24406717
Yeah sure

>> No.24407002

>>24406324
no youre just a loser, everyone was on facebook by 2006

>> No.24407225

>>24406417
>And the interview was only 6 months ago. We're still well within the timeframe of 'the coming months'.
I'm not trying to refute that, it's the fact that the anon I'm replying to said that t-sigs imply staking, and that's not true. Staking requires the adequate usecase going live and clients that require a cryptoeconomic incentive from node operators to solve counterparty risk. That's not fudding, at all. All I'm saying is staking doesn't require t-sigs nor the other way around

>> No.24407289

token not needed. xrp flare will render eth/link useless. sergay knows this and hes being prepared for soft exit for a while and converting link into XRP/XLM

DYOR or stay poor holding your useless erc-20

link is the official zoomer coin of the biz

>> No.24407323 [DELETED] 
File: 5 KB, 265x87, link.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24407323

>>24407225
Staking by eoy, see staked.us
T-sigs Q1 2021.

>> No.24407337 [DELETED] 

What do you think about duckdao.io?

Wanna take part in their Hunters season but cant’ decide is it good or not.
Please, take a look and share your thoughts/opinion

>> No.24407449

>>24406847
I'm glad you admit it.
>>24407002
>Number of active users at Facebook over the years
>12 million — End of 2006.
Kek

>> No.24407644

>>24404230
They’ve moved the dev progress from a more public, transparent and accountable pivotal tracker to an inhouse solution.
Idk what to make of that.

>> No.24407735

Vaporware trash

>> No.24407736

>>24407644
Nvm I was wrong, it seems they have resumed activity on the pivotaltracker
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823/

>> No.24408321

>>24405698
Just give it up for gods sake. You are and have been truly proved wrong. Thats ok though, just don't Trupm it and refuse to admit defeat. It makes you look weak and foolish.

>> No.24408384

>>24408321
Ouch the ESL comes back with a new ip. Not a look I'd go for but hope it works for you.

>> No.24408446

>>24408384
Dig dig dig. I can taste your shame, just give it up, buy link and quietly fuck off

>> No.24408481

>>24404994
Nico has gotten so much hotter lately

>> No.24408508

>>24405260
>Yeah, rest of the year or in the next year or so.
>Both mean this year

... wat