[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 82 KB, 576x768, 1606133700731.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24341928 No.24341928 [Reply] [Original]

It's coming.

>> No.24342042
File: 6 KB, 225x225, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342042

I FEEL IT COMING!!

>> No.24342236

>>24341928
FUCK OFF ranjeet,

>> No.24342251

DOTB is nearing. NSMDO and FUCK NOILERS

>> No.24342278
File: 968 KB, 1332x850, AADA429A-E8D7-47B8-A9F9-0D1F41CB407D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342278

DOTB IS UPON US

>> No.24342307
File: 200 KB, 361x363, 1605909483732.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342307

>> No.24342317
File: 8 KB, 275x183, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342317

>>24342251
I'm a bit late to the party, what do DOTB and NSMDO stand for?

>> No.24342339

I’m a turbo oilet with only 1K barrels will I still make it

>> No.24342426

>>24342339
how does $1000000 sound?

>> No.24342452

>>24341928
And what use does this coin bring

>> No.24342484

>>24342317
>>24342317
they stand for grug hold rock

>> No.24342644

>>24341928
Microsoft, Amazon and Google provide a cheaper and faster service making cloud computing decentralised is a retarded idea offering no advantages

>> No.24342709
File: 11 KB, 225x225, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342709

>>24342644

proof?

>> No.24342820

>>24342644
Why would it be cheaper?

Amazon/Google/Microsoft shell out tons of money to prop up data centers that require vast sums of money to build, maintain and upgrade. This all gets paid for by the customers.

iExec would not need to charge for any of this. FUD eliminated

>> No.24342842
File: 630 KB, 638x794, 23454356686.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24342842

>> No.24343000

>>24342820
Ok so iexec is offering a distributed computing platform. So an individual or corporation uses RLC to pay for compute right? Ok that makes sense to me.
And this Compute is distributed. Ok cool so where is this distributed compute coming from? Other people who sign up to use iexec and join worker pools and offer their computer power to worker pool? Ok that makes sense, cool cool.

Ok so where are these worker pool getting this distributed computing power? Oh I see, they use their datacenters and on premise compute in order to add power to the worker pool? Oh ok that makes perfect sense to me.
BUT
According to you it cost tons of money to prop up data centers that require vast sums of money to build maintain and upgrade. Since this infrastructure is so expensive, I guess it they won't have the cash to build this infrastructure in house and will have to outsource it to a cloud provider...

????????

Fucking dumb pajeets. Destroyed using your own logic.

>> No.24343098

>>24343000
You can set up your own PC as a worker node to earn RLC for completing tasks....

The site even tells you how to do this, you actually think iExec is just playing hopscotch to another cloud provider?

>> No.24343172

>>24343098

> You can set up your own PC as a worker node to earn RLC for completing tasks....

This is the core of what RLC is trying to achieve.

Unifying all different types of tech, hardware, operating systems, through firewalls and all kinds of network topologies.

This is near impossible to achieve. And to be cheaper than like AWS? Good luck with that.

Only usecase would be "anonymous" compute, but who the fuck needs that?

>> No.24343200
File: 122 KB, 1000x972, grug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343200

>>24342278
>>24342842
The OC is literally the only reason I'm considering buying oil barrels.... Am I doing /biz/ right

>> No.24343229

>>24341928
What’s coming you fucking faggot?

>> No.24343286

>>24343098
Oh I see, so I can purchase a personal computer and then have a big corporation utilize my compute in a worker pool? Oh Ok cool that makes sense.

So let see here - Let's assume a company wants to analyze about 200 TB worth of data and they need some compute right? Let's also assume this 200TB can be analyze in an hour and 1 RLC is worth about $100.

So my personal computer with i7 x 8 core + 16gb costs about $900. That doesn't include the cost of electricity that I pay in order to leave my computer on to run to process this work load. This is just the upfront capital costs.

A similar ec2 instance on aws with the same specs costs $0.204 an hour. If you use on-demand pricing, this is immediately discounted by 70-90%.

This task costs 0.10 "OIL BARRELS" to complete.

I'm a big dick chad executive a data firm that handles highly confidential datasets that needs this task done. Who do you think I'm going utilize for my compute?
A. AWS - Trusted provider with multiple security best practices and certifications
B. A random blockchain that's overseas and utilizes a bunch of random computers /computing devices (FOG) across the world with disparate security that costs me more.

>> No.24343322

I'm getting chainlink vibes

>> No.24343336

>>24343286
yeah, you're right, it's a total scam...

*wink*

>> No.24343363

>>24343336
Great rebuttal - you were presented with hard data and you have nothing to say..Anyway, if this project was is so good, why are so many people shilling it? Shouldn't you be accumulating as many barrels as you can for yourself? Economics is a 0 sum game, in order for you to win, someone has to lose.

>> No.24343398

>>24343363
>Economics is a 0 sum game, in order for you to win, someone has to lose.
literally not true in the slightest

>> No.24343422
File: 3.15 MB, 412x291, NSMDO (2).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343422

New memes

>> No.24343447

>>24343398
If my statement is not true, why are you pajeets trying to pump RLC so badly? Clearly you don't care about the project, you only care about dropping your bags on normies. I've yet to see a single RLC thread that talks about the benefits of the technology. Only that "SOMETHING IS COMING, IM NOT GOING TO SAY WHAT BUT ITS COMING."

Yeah Ok Faggots.

>> No.24343454
File: 728 KB, 750x932, DD637AFC-9330-4913-AB5A-9B38A511DE1D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343454

>>24343286
Finally someone with a fucking brain, what crypto are u holding, is XRP going to crash tomorrow? God bless your big brain.

>> No.24343456

>>24343172
It already works pajeet you had 4 years

>> No.24343489

>>24343098
link plz fellow oiler

>> No.24343495

>>24343363
I forgot that you were smarter than IBM,Intel, Nvidia, Ubisoft etc.....

DOTB will happen without you, when there are people creating their own private data centers to scrape a mere 0.00001 RLC per hour you will know deep down in your heart of hearts that you are truly a faggot

>> No.24343500

>>24341928
less than a month for the last 6 months lol

>> No.24343516

>>24343447
I haven't shilled RLC at all, and I don't own any bags, just pointing out it's basic econ101 that your statement is false.

>> No.24343524

>>24343422
also, check em

>> No.24343547

>>24343489
https://docs.iex.ec/for-workers/quick-worker-start

>> No.24343553

>>24343454
85% of my portfolio is XRP. I cashed out all of the money I made during the pandemic by buying things cheaply (this includes my 401k) in the traditional derivatives market and moved it into crypto. I was holding PLTR (I understand what they do as a company as I applied there for a security engineering role) for a little while and made some money on that as well. I may buy back in depending on what happens in next few months in the US political space.

Speaking of oil, I told everyone to buy oil back when it was less than $2 and all they did was send me memes of how useless oil was... I restructured my portfolios to go all in on oil and energy companies.. Oil is now worth $42 a barrel...

>> No.24343577
File: 2.27 MB, 3000x2000, 4EC315FE-5150-439F-B0DB-5E34FEA7F5A0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343577

>>24343447
Doesn’t matter if it works, you just need people to believe it will someday work. RLC has good marketing, which IMO is the most important thing to look for.

>> No.24343628

>>24342452
Nothing. No one is gonna adopt this shit mixed with piss of a coin. We don’t even have any meaningful dApps after how many years. You think 2021 is going to suddenly bring an influx of dApps clamoring to use RLC tokens for decentralized computing resources? Lmao

>> No.24343638

>>24343577
and please check this anon!!! jeeez what happened to this board?
BASED comment and checked.

>> No.24343665

>>24343447
>I've yet to see a single RLC thread that talks about the benefits of the technology.
There was literally one still up two hours ago you pajeet tranny
>>24317626

>> No.24343672

>>24343547
thank you

>> No.24343673

>>24343495
IBM is a failing company. There cloud offerings specifically Skytap is garbage. I worked for a company who has been an IBM customer for over 50 years.. You know the saying "No one ever gets fired by hiring IBM". They exist primarily because their sales team is good and their shit is expensive. Otherwise IBM is a failing company.

Intel - This is a nothing burger. This was a partnership where intel offered their hardware to iexec for a research POC. Intel offers their hardware to multiple startups for POC purposes... What point are you trying to make by mentioning intel?

Nvidia: Same as above - offered GPUs for a research POC.

Ubisoft: Same as above - used the tech for rendering (Augmented Reality) as part of their POC. Cool, there are plenty of other cloud platforms that allow corporations to offload their compute to them for rendering purposes.

>> No.24343708

I started slowing DCA into RLC a week or so ago, yes I am newfag. I want to buy ~1,000-1,500 barrels. Should I DCA faster or just go all in while its still under a dollar? Only bought about 300 so far

>> No.24343722

>>24343665
Oh let's see what benefits were mentioned in this thread. Ok here we go
First post: "“..We can now organize decentralized infrastructures and marketplaces, where everyone will be able to rent its computing resources, where the innovative SMEs which design Big Data and HPC applications will be able to sell them online immediately with the needed resources to run them, and where highly valued data sets will be rentable with a fine-grain business model.”"

Oh ok cool, this sounds like Azure and AWS.. Let's see if there are any other innovations mentioned in this thread that talk about the benefits of adopting RLC / OIL BARRELS:

Remainder of posts:
CHECKED A TOAST TOILY BROS
WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT OILY BROS
BROS FUCK ALL NOILERS
HOW MANY BARRELS YOU HOLDING MY OILY BRETHERN.
"NOOOO U DONT UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF IEXEC RLC BARRELS" - ad infinitum without explaining the benefits (this occurs in 10 posts)..
??? Am I missing something?

>> No.24343784

Look don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to fud you pajeets to death here but I've yet to see a thread can intelligently explain why iEXEC is a game changer and why I should invest in their AI / Fog / Cloud computing platform over pre-established players with blockchain tech such as Microsoft and AWS. If you're going to shill this product so hard, at least try to convince us so it doesn't come off like you're pushing a Pump and Dump

>> No.24343793

>>24342317
day of the barrel/not selling my digital oil

>> No.24343801

>>24343577
I'm not sure if the pic is related but if it is, everyone who invested in Theranos lost their money..That doesn't inspire me to invest in RLC.

>> No.24343811
File: 116 KB, 1116x1011, 1598666811375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343811

>>24343363
can i see your PhD please, sir?

>> No.24343812

>>24342339
So this is an IDF scam too?

>> No.24343813
File: 359 KB, 1242x2688, DF71D43A-A653-4743-AF2A-3C241489D5CE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343813

>>24341928
I’m ready.
I’ll continue to buy until a real pump start

>> No.24343828

>>24343784
Can someone answer this guy. I’ll buy a bag if someone can answer him. Is it possible to get RLC compute prices CHEAPER than AWS/Azure? Maybe if they get enough resources in the network? What do you think?

>> No.24343838

>>24343784
Right. At least stinky linkies had some genius rebuttal every so often. RLC threads, just like this one, will eventually be archived with no substantive technical information warranting the hype

>> No.24343859

>>24343801
Thanks man, whats a good sell for XRP and buy point had to sell my holdings earlier last month to pay for repairs on my rental, would like to get back in now that i have cash

>> No.24343862
File: 80 KB, 889x1007, stare mirrored.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24343862

>>24343722
Yes your MAXIMUM three minute 5 second skim read of a 246 post thread (of the kind that you implied never got made don't forget), is fairly portrayed by your basedjak tier strawman, especially when you ignore every link in the thread. Surely this means that you're a sincere poster worth engaging and not just a fudding faggot.

>> No.24343870

>>24343801
Probably should’ve posted Musk instead desu

>> No.24343882

>>24341928
how do I even buy? Is iexec the token? It doesn't seem so, but everybody shills it as IEXEC and not RLC..

>> No.24343885

>>24343828
Worker nodes compete with each other to offer the lowest price to complete a task so in theory it could be cheaper to attract more tasks. This in combination with no centralized infrastructure to maintain makes it likely to be cheaper.

>> No.24343939

>>24343286
>If you use on-demand pricing, this is immediately discounted by 70-90%.
do you understand what on-demand pricing is? if anything it would be more expensive than non-on-demand pricing. Not everyone rents a server for a few hours, most often they run for years.
>A similar ec2 instance on aws with the same specs costs $0.204 an hour
that's $152 a month. If you were to offer it yourself on the blockchain you would be making net profit after 6 months. Do you think that's cheap? You don't think we can go cheaper? We can, and that's why people will use RLC. It will be competitive like no other cloud.

>> No.24343961

>>24343862
I've asked the same questions about RLC in that thread among others, and to date, I've yet to receive an answer from any anon that explains why this technology is such a game changer. I've read the white papers including their main one on cloud computer (https://iex.ec/wp-content/uploads/pdf/iExec-WPv3.0-English.pdf).).

This isn't pointless FUD, this is asking simple follow up questions before I invest my money. The fact that anons (read:pajeets) get defensive the moment I start poking at their "BIG THINGS COMING" innovations, immediately tells me that they are attempting to push a pump and dump scam. I'm willing to bet you all are bag holders from iexecs 2017 and are trying to drop your bags because they are breaking your arms.

>> No.24343982

>>24343577
Based understanding

>> No.24344032

>>24343882
Google is hard

>> No.24344057

>>24343885
Yep marketplace economics
>>24343939
False

>> No.24344063

>>24343939
You're referring to reserved pricing, which grants additional discounting to individuals who reserve a set amount of compute resources over a long period of time (1-3 years). If you're analyzing ad hoc data sets, this doesn't work because you can't pre plan how big your data set is going to be, there are too many variables involved.

As for your second point, my example states that the dataset only takes an hour to analyze. You wouldn't pay the $152 a month, only the 0.204. Further, my response was to a comment above regarding how much cheaper RLC is than building your own datacenter. RLC's benefit is utilizing multiple computing devices for distributed computing to lower the cost. But an anon above stated that building your own datacenter is expensive.

So the logic is faulty. There is a massive upfront cost associated before RLC can see benefits because building datacenters is not cheap. Building distributed computing is not cheap, the compute has to come from somewhere. The problem here is scale, and AWS, Azure and GCP have already solved this. They subsidize their datacenter operations with other parts of their business (software subscriptions, advertising, retail ops, etc)

>> No.24344083

>>24343961
>iexecs 2017

Typo: 2017 initial coin offering.

>> No.24344084

>>24343708
Try to have 1k barrels minimum. Now after the dip it's cheaper

>> No.24344202

>>24343961
>I've asked the same questions about RLC in that thread among others, and to date,
>This isn't pointless FUD, this is asking simple follow up questions before I invest my money. The fact that anons (read:pajeets) get defensive the moment I start poking at their "BIG THINGS COMING" innovations, immediately tells me that they are attempting to push a pump and dump scam.
Why are you even considering investing to the point of asking this question in multiple threads if you never receive an answer and think it's a pump and dump scam?

>> No.24344209

>>24344063
If I can get compute resources for my AI cheaper than AWS/Azure why would this not be of value?

>> No.24344264

>>24344209
You won't be able to in the near future no one will be able to out price iExec.

>> No.24344267

>>24344063
I have a pretty beefy PC that I rarely use to it's full potential. If I can rent half of the cores and ram for $0.2 an hour I'll gladly do it. This is what's great about distributed computing. The hardware is already out there, it's just not used.

>> No.24344278

>>24344202
Because I'm not a pajeet and I don't like scammers. I'd rather prevent other anons from getting scammed than make money myself. It's called Morals..
>>24344209
Great question, but your the basis of your argument is that the AI resources are going to be "cheaper". The cheapness involves scale, as in there are tons of workers that are in a pool, so those workers split the workload and ultimately pass off the cost savings in the form of less RLC spent right? But the main problem that isn't be answered is, where is this cheap compute coming from? Compute doesn't just appear out of the thin air, someone or something still needs to own the compute and provide it with power. It's a catch 22, companies aren't going to buy RLC for compute if it's expensive, and individual workers aren't going to offer their compute if it costs them more money then they make from rewards.

>> No.24344281

>>24344267
>distributed computing
decentralized*

>> No.24344312
File: 6 KB, 588x77, DOTB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24344312

I am prepared

>> No.24344313

>>24344278
Cheap compute is coming from Jakarta sirs

>> No.24344319

>>24344278
>Because I'm not a pajeet
>Great question, but your the basis of your argument
Doubt
Thanks for caring about my financial well being

>> No.24344324

>>24344267
I would to, but the money to pay you for your time has to come from somewhere. If the pool is too expensive for corporations to buy into, they won't and you won't make any money.

This project's business model is basically speculating that people will adopt their technology and offer their compute up for rewards, but there is no real guarantee that any corporations / enterprises will actually use this technology.

>> No.24344335

I can't wait till faggots get priced out

>> No.24344345

>>24344319
You're welcome. Enjoy holding your bags from iexecs 2017 ICO until the end of time.

>> No.24344349

>>24344324
For sure dude companies will never adopt the world's first decentralized marketplace for compute and data. Absolutely. Don't buy.

>> No.24344365

>>24344278
And right now rewards don’t out scale cost? Like if I set up my gaming PC as a node on the network it won’t pay back the electricity it costs? Do you have numbers on this? Or are you just thinking for larger operations it won’t be worth it?

>> No.24344372

>>24344345
Oh look it's the fudder from the other thread.

>> No.24344389

>>24344324
In practice cloud platforms like Azure/AWS/Alibaba could rent their unused compute on the blockchain, for the same price if not lower (thanks to the competition). There's no reason not to, unused hardware is wasted hardware.

>> No.24344391

>>24344365
Currently there no demand so there's no point. That's the only criticism of it but one that will resolve over time

>> No.24344413

>>24344365

I would personally like to see the reward numbers myself, so No. There doesn't seem to be any data on this. I logged into the worker pool myself and didn't see anything, it looks like no one is using the platform at all. I wish I had data because I'm trying to see if this is worth it at all, and so far, everything I've found is pointing to No.

As for your later question - Yes. It's a chicken and egg problem. In order for large operations to be worth it, there needs to be a significant amount of compute. But a significant amount of compute will cease to exist if the rewards aren't worth it.

>> No.24344441

>>24344391
> "Currently there is no demand"
> Assumption that demand will pick up over time.

You do see the problem here, right?

>> No.24344453

>>24344278
Kek RLC faggots btfo

Stay oily bros you'll need to be lubed up for the rapeing the markets going to give you

>> No.24344457
File: 63 KB, 900x1280, 1605700413612.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24344457

>>24344324

>> No.24344467

>>24344324
I can appreciate that you actually care about getting answers, you are right that there is no real guarantee

BUT

The contract under NDA is being lifted Q1 2021, so we will see what that has in store. To me, its clear that decentralized cloud computing will inevitably happen, you must know that only large corporations and government were the only ones to have access to a single computer, now everyone does.

Inevitably, everyone will have access to the kind of computational power that corporations and governments do. iExec solves this.

>> No.24344485

iExec RLC

What it can do
decentralized cloud, trusted executions, cloud resources (data sets, computing power, ...) marketplace, trusted doracles, tokenization & monetization of cloud assets (NFTs), ENS and it's FULLY COMPLIANT (French SEC approved, so basicly EU approved, so basicly USA approved, so basicly Coinbase, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, ... approved)

Partnerships and collaborations
Intel, Alibaba Cloud, Nvidia, EU commision (Ontochain) + French SEC approves, Ubisoft, EEA, CCC, EDF, Chainlink, OpenSSF, IBM Cloud, NCTU, Genesis Cloud, H7, BPI France, Scontain, Shift, Fortanix, TFCloud, Nerdalize, Ubisoft, Cloud & Heat, Stimergy, OpenFog, ...

Next technical release
V5 2nd part. FOG/edge computing to keep the latency low for tasks that require real time data.

Upcoming adoption releases
eRLC which is a fully compliant version of RLC for companies and is 1:1 interchangeable with RLC. If you look at the adoption roadmap you can also clearly see NDAs being revealed soon

>> No.24344487

>>24344441
No because that's how life works retard. By all means buy after adoption.

>> No.24344496
File: 341 KB, 340x255, iexec-pepe-barrel-wojaks.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24344496

Notice how big players are mentioning iExec and not just the other way around? Yeah.

Intel
https://builders.intel.com/ai/membership/iexec
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/can-a-blockchain-controlled-robot-change-the-future.html
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/new-confidential-computing-solutions-emerge-on-the-hyperledger-avalon-trusted-compute.html

IBM
https://twitter.com/ibmcloud/status/1067584636728082433
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/announcements/announcing-ibm-cloud-data-shield-beta-at-think-2019

Ubisoft
https://www.ubisoft.com/en-US/careers/gcdetail.aspx?id=321969

European Commission
https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ontochain/

Memberships
https://confidentialcomputing.io/members/
https://openssf.org/about/members/
https://entethalliance.org/eea-members/

Also take a look at the 7 PhD team
https://iex.ec/about-us/

And the CEO
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&hl=en

Website: https://iex.ec/
Medium: https://medium.com/iex-ec
Twitter: https://twitter.com/iEx_ec
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/iExec/videos <--- Look at their showcases or demo videos
Adoption roadmap: https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-adoption-roadmap

>> No.24344501

>>24344413
Thanks anon. Saved me the time of doing this myself. Seems like a promising project conceptually but without proper incentives this will go nowhere.

>> No.24344523

>>24344501
Stay poor noiler

>> No.24344530

>>24344485
It seems like none of you jeets shilling this piece of shit even know the first thing about RLC and just copy paste bullshit without ever logically addressing the fud.

Huge red flag that the community is just sub 60 IQ retards who got conned by all the big buzzwords.

>> No.24344537

>>24344530
What fud?

>> No.24344543
File: 102 KB, 255x192, to do lel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24344543

>>24344413
>I would personally like to see the reward numbers myself, so No. There doesn't seem to be any data on this. I logged into the worker pool myself and didn't see anything, it looks like no one is using the platform at all. I wish I had data because I'm trying to see if this is worth it at all, and so far, everything I've found is pointing to No.
Wait so your problem is that you're not going to invest in something before it's adopted? You want to get a cheap investment after it is 100% confirmed to be successful?
Top kek. Don't buy it, no skin off my back

>> No.24344575

>>24344496
I addressed all of these "partners" in an earlier post. A lot of these links are marketing pablum.

>>24344530
Yep.
The only counter response I've received is some variation of"HAVE FUN BEING POOR RETARD".


>>24344501
You're welcome!

>> No.24344585

>>24344543
>b-but I only invest after there is adoption and enterprises have bought up all the supply.

>> No.24344590

>>24344543
And this faggot fudder doesn't know the rewards are set per job so it can be whatever the fucking pool wants it to be since it's a literal market hahahaha noilers are so stupid

>> No.24344600

>>24344543
Anons above and in other threads are claiming that there is massive partnership. If these partnerships were more than POC's I'd expect there would at least be a worker pool or two that I could join to test out the hardware, since these partners are allegedly using the technology in production environments (pro tip: they arent).

>> No.24344617

>>24344600
Enterprise market is separate

>> No.24344628

>>24344530
I'm a cloud user myself and I've worked with businesses that use the cloud. All of them hate the lock-in, prices and how hard they can be to use, they were supposed to replace DevOps and SysOps but they just made it into CloudOps which is way more complicated than how it used to be. They're all redpilled on decentralized computing and rooting for iExec. If you don't want in on the train then it's your choice. I'm just trying to make more people aware of the option.

>> No.24344643

>>24344628
Lock in is a huge problem and iExec solves that

>> No.24344684

Fudders get the rope. I'm sure all of them will change their mind after it gets approved in the US (on the roadmap) and they can buy it on their sad regulated baby versions of exchanges.

>> No.24344746

>>24344684
If this gets approved and regulated in the US its immediately going to become a stable coin. This mindset doesn't make any sense. If every fucking company comes up with their own crypto currency that used to pay for their services or to adopt their platform, why do people think one companies coin is going to be worth more than another companies coin for services when everything is regulated?

These aren't securities.

>> No.24344765

Oilers just admit this is a quick pump and dump exit. You don't care about the technology, you just want to escape from your 3rd world cardboard shacks. I'm not judging you, you gotta do what you gotta do.

>> No.24344781
File: 97 KB, 638x656, nsmdo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24344781

>>24344765

>> No.24344813

>>24344746
>>24344765
You're really dumb and annoying and your fud is trash

>> No.24344852

Oilers got absolutely BTFO by the logic above.

>> No.24344886

>>24344813
Sure, feel free to save this thread. I'll be reposting it myself when iExec inevitably dumps to sub 0.10.

>> No.24344903

>>24344765
>Oilers just admit this is a quick pump and dump exit.
AKA easy money, buy now!

>> No.24344934

>>24344765
Most people holding are euros. Stay mad mutt.

>> No.24344936

>>24344903
Yeah I'll be frank, I'm just controlled opposition. I actually hold RLC barrels. I'm fudding to shake out weak hands

>> No.24344947

>>24344852
Never happened
>>24344886
You making shit up won't do shit and you'll eventually kys after missing this gem

>> No.24345060

Check the Binance BTC order book. Large buy orders accumulating, volume spike too.
Get your stack together asap, fellow oilbros.

>> No.24345106

>>24344813
Another fantastically articulated counter argument by rlcjeets

>> No.24345124

>>24344936
Based

>> No.24345133

>>24345106
Because of you make up shit fud I'm going to respond with shit replies

>> No.24345152

>>24345133
Cry more bitch, no one's dumb enough to buy this shit coin

>> No.24345170

>>24345152
I'm not crying you are. RLC will moon in 2 weeks good luck

>> No.24345246
File: 41 KB, 706x886, iexec-cloud-ui.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345246

damn i checked their demo app and i see they already support azure and aws in their worker pool, they're farther ahead than i thought

>> No.24345315

>>24344575
>I addressed all of these "partners" in an earlier post. A lot of these links are marketing pablum.
Trash tier fud. Absolute trash tier. Not every single link is good but most of them are.
kys

>> No.24345337

>>24345246
Heh

>> No.24345392
File: 2.44 MB, 2250x2850, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345392

>>24345246
here's the result

>> No.24345425
File: 46 KB, 457x416, kektana.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345425

>>24345152
you must be 18 to post here niglet
gtfo and stay poor
>>24345246
this is beautiful man
nothing can stop what is coming
DAY OF THE BARREL SOON

>> No.24345464
File: 122 KB, 629x432, NSMDO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345464

>>24344936
It's necessary. we must fill our bags during the dip

>> No.24345465

>>24341928
Just joined the ranks of the oil bros today! Will add more when I can.

>> No.24345497
File: 605 KB, 800x800, ie oil mining.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345497

>>24345465
congratulations, you're quite literally securing your financial future

>> No.24345500

>>24345392
Kek

>> No.24345692

>>24344936
Let’s talk about incentives friends, take this poster for example
>23 posts by this ID
Now ask yourself, why would someone take so much time out of their day to post about a coin they hate? Are they doing it out of the kindness of their heart? A personal crusade for the benefit of this board? Or maybe... there’s a personal reason...

>> No.24345872
File: 54 KB, 850x478, ie officedo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345872

>>24345692
kek they said they are fudding weak hands
I think RLC might have the highest amount of holder fud currently
because we all know it's going to be huge players pumping our bags after SEC approval and individuals here really don't matter for the pump

>> No.24345917

>>24345170
Lmao how old are you kid, "no you are"

There's three types of holders
Jeets
Kids
Sub 60 IQ brainlets

Decentralised computing is retarded

>> No.24345971
File: 71 KB, 960x960, 1540268360558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24345971

>>24341928
I don't have any money to buy right now, but how many RLC is a suicide stack?

>> No.24345984

>>24345917
If it's so retarded why are 7 PhDs working on it? And why are big companies talking about it?
And you're smarter than all of them.

>> No.24345986

>>24345917
No you are
>>24345971
870

>> No.24345996

>>24345971
870 suicide, not sure

>> No.24345998

>>24341928
digital diarrhea

>> No.24346001

>>24345984
He's smarter than all of them and lives in his mom's basement and is a future ceo billionaire

>> No.24346002

>>24343813
>all those shitcoins
jfc anon...

>> No.24346015
File: 436 KB, 1230x1268, ie intel AI renting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24346015

>>24345971
870 sui
>>24345984
let the tranny peasants stay poor fellow RLChad
some people truly aren't worth saving

>> No.24346066

Don't lie, price will stay low for a few more months.

>> No.24346076

>>24346066
Nope. Double bottom is in

>> No.24346109

>>24345917
Decentralization is in style dude. Everything’s gonna be a “global system” or a “cloud driven network.” It’s the obvious way people think things are headed.

>> No.24346161

How much would 1k stack make on DOTB?

>> No.24346175

>>24346161
it isnt about 1 day, it's about the days after

>> No.24346213
File: 396 KB, 2506x1576, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24346213

Dudes, I want to hear your thoughts about one platform: duckdao.io

Came across their Hunter Season on Twitter, this is a kind of crypto game and platform with investment instruments. They made long-term partnerships and Foundation for modern blockchain-based systems.

>> No.24346216

>>24346175
I think I get it, I bought some but how will I know when to sell?

>> No.24346241
File: 154 KB, 1080x765, FC05A692-3138-11EB-A231-0EB1F5E8B2ED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24346241

>>24345872

>> No.24346244

>>24346216
I'm cashing out at $11,490 a barrel

>> No.24346258

>>24346216
You sell 10% of your stack once those 10% will set you for live

>> No.24346260

>>24346216
When RLC is in the top 5 where it belongs

>> No.24346322
File: 299 KB, 469x283, 1595482988235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24346322

digital doggy doo doo

>> No.24347104

>>24343000
You can have a worker pool comprised of hundreds, thousands, even tens of thousands of neet nodes all working in synchronicity.

No one is destroyed by their own logic here, you are just a fucking idiot.

>> No.24347124
File: 2.97 MB, 550x310, sneed.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24347124

Am I too late to buy lads?

>> No.24347776

>>24341928
>less than a month to accumulate
why?

>> No.24347828

Do you know anything about duckdao.io?

Wanna play their Hunters season but hard to decide is it good or not.
Please, take a look and share your thoughts/opinion

>> No.24347837

>>24347828
Fuck off stinky pajeet

>> No.24348041

>>24343961
Hi my thinking was (holding33 barrels) for non -comm use, that right now if I prepare some special video algoryth (like the one used to add frames to low frame old movies) or even have some presets for photoshop. Non-com users could safely send the photo/video to that "service+dAPP" and recive the improved material safely/fast/cheap. For commercial use ther is the blockage for safety for sure, if full safety could be guaranteed than it is possible other vise no one would take such a risk.

>> No.24348276

>>24343000
>>24343286
>>24343722
>>24343961
Thanks for the input. You make some good points. I gotta do more research.

>> No.24348393

>>24343882
You will always be poor

>> No.24348482

Alright guys how many barrels for 10 mil?

>> No.24348542

>>24348482
8700 short term