am I the only one who still thinks LINK is a scam

[Anonymous No.24237272]

Isn't this exactly the "what NEETS think will happen vs what will actually happen" image?
At this "advanced" point, LINK is nothing more than collateral, and you could just as easily have an insurance fund of BTC/ETH held in escrow.

[Anonymous No.24237509]

All of crypto is a scam desu

[Anonymous No.24237551]

it is
>>24237509
and this
but literally sergey could dump all 600 million tokens overnight and it wouldn't be illegal
who's to say he doesn't get extremely wasted one night, wakes up hungover and can't be fucked dialling in to a meeting with ari?

[Anonymous No.24237568]

>>24237272
My friend, link will be more valuable than anything after eth2.0. You have no idea.

[Anonymous No.24237658]

>>24237272
Why do you post this stuff every single day?

[Anonymous No.24237746]

>>24237272
yes
this is bizzare what happened to link. It's price i mean

[Anonymous No.24238052]

>>24237746
>fud becomes reality
>price goes up
It is supposed to be fud because it is wrong. When Sergey confirms that actually yes this is exactly what is occurring and nodes really will be cut out (and with them, any reason for the token) then why do people keep buying?

[Anonymous No.24238746]

>>24237272
> what neets will think image
tranny psyops anon LINK is middleware so it sits between things
> transfer and call standard required as unit of account within the network
> Collateral used to stop Jewish tricks e.g. fractional reserve lending
> etc. etc.
you know this already

[Anonymous No.24239401]

>>24237272
It actually is and API3 will replace Chainlink as the global oracle infrastructure

[Anonymous No.24239497]

>>24237272
>am I the only one
Yes, nobody else is retarded. We have know for a long time they there is zero percent chance link is a scam.

[Anonymous No.24239585]

>>24238746
Isn't this exactly what the thread is about though? When nodes are cut out and the only value link has is being collateral, sources would prefer being paid in eth or btc which are more stable and don't have 600,000,000 more tokens ready to be dumped in the wings. $10m in BTC is probably still going to be worth $5m if the whole market tanks, but $10m in LINK might drop to $2m. Someone who just lost $10m in a contract fuckup where the oracle was at fault is always going to prefer the former.

[Anonymous No.24239674]

>>24238052
What would be the incentive to use the network then? Just cause it’s fun?

[Anonymous No.24239762]

>>24237272
>still
No one ever thought link was a scam anon
That was just fud to fuck with people who couldn’t take 5 mins to actually participate in the actual discussion

[Anonymous No.24239815]

>>24237272
1000 eoy faggot

[Anonymous No.24239825]

>>24239585
yeah that's the point of link being backend with loads of adaptors to cut down on friction. All defi solutions are told to avoid using singular price oracles and use the decentralized link network instead which has to use the link token

[Anonymous No.24239876]

>>24239585
Also if you're talking about market exposure to DLT assets well that's up to the market makers to decide. BTC cycles are based on math so my guess is additional capital coming in will allow for additional volatility.

[Anonymous No.24239936]

>>24237272
you know this is a response from chainlink addressing fud pointed out in the api3 whitepaper?

[Anonymous No.24239988]

I don't understand whats going on in this thread could someone please fill me in? Are the nodes going to be phased out?

[Anonymous No.24240001]

>>24239936
kek burek btfo

[Anonymous No.24240039]

>>24239988
Checked. LINK Nodes are the network

[Anonymous No.24240049]

>>24239825
It's a scam that depends on imaginary hardware; the intel sgx just doesn't work like Sergei wants it to

[Anonymous No.24240093]

>>24240049
> intel couldn't build hardware good enough
this is so bullish anon

[Anonymous No.24240134]

>>24237272
It is one of the possible architectures as an answer to API3.
LINK has many different architectures for different needs. The nodes won't be cut off, because no nodes = centralization. Some use cases are fine with a centralized approach and it's ok.

[Anonymous No.24240148]

>>24239988
multi level marketing scam based on a simple json parser

[Anonymous No.24240189]

>>24240001
Not at all. Chainlink pretends to do the thing that API3 optimizes for. But I don't expect link marines to have good reading comprehension.

[Anonymous No.24240240]

>>24240093
It's a security problem, not a hardware problem. Read the white paper and compare it the sgx

[Anonymous No.24240242]

>>24239988
checked $88 eoy

[Anonymous No.24240268]

>>24240189
We've been over this many times before Burek. Enjoy your three million dollars

[Anonymous No.24240284]

>>24237272
>am i the only one who still thinks link is a scam
no, there's plenty of retarded faggots on plebbit who got fudded into believing that
feel free to go back - and stay there

[Anonymous No.24240301]

link is to expensive to use right now.
0.1 link per request means paying $1.40 per request.
Papa serg will have to start dumping it some more until its about the prize of a cup of coffee.

[Anonymous No.24240318]

>>24240268
How many pictures of Burek do you have in your Burek folder?

[Anonymous No.24240347]

>>24237568
Link won’t even be on 2.0 for another two years

[Anonymous No.24240364]

>>24240240
> sgx is one of many approaches
> sgx didn't work because it has security problems
> b-but it's still good hardware
> link is over faggot
kek

[Anonymous No.24240374]

>>24240301
You had 3 years

[Anonymous No.24240385]

>>24240318
one is enough

[Anonymous No.24240426]

>>24240385
Please, I want to see them. It's so hard finding rare Bureks!

[Anonymous No.24240448]

>>24239936
>our competitors have a valid criticism about our network so we're actually going to integrate their business model into our own
>yes this invalidates everything I've been saying about decentralised nodes for the past 3 years whoopsie
this is... bullish?

[Anonymous No.24240567]

>>24240448
saying you can just integrate someone else's architecture and business model vs actually doing it are two different things.

[Anonymous No.24240679]

>>24240567
I was talking about LINK copying API3's model and calling it "advanced"

[Anonymous No.24240725]

>>24240679
> LINK JUST CHINKED API3
5D chess

[Anonymous No.24240746]

>>24237272
>and you could just as easily have an insurance fund of BTC/ETH held in escrow.
And what the fuck do you think Link is?

[Anonymous No.24241861]

>>24240746
>And what the fuck do you think Link is?
the only thing that gives LINK any value is staking and its been 3 years and they haven't implemented it, and have even stopped talking about, instead it's
>muh data quality
>muh premium apis

[Anonymous No.24242267]

>>24237551
What if he dies?