Is it a scam

[Anonymous No.24190887]

Yes or no?

[Anonymous No.24190927]

legit and will make you rich. check their partnerships

[Anonymous No.24190975]

>>24190887
very scam sir

[Anonymous No.24191017]

No of course not Sir. Scam do not go up, they go down. You mean to say you are not all-in on the digital oil? You are missing out as we speak Sir.

[Anonymous No.24191029]

>>24190887
VERY SCAM SIRS

[Anonymous No.24191037]

Would literally suck Gilles’ cock for this to crash one last time. I have 7.5k bong bucks to unload but too stubborn over $1. I’m seriously going to regret this

[Anonymous No.24191048]

>>24190887
its not a scam. its a 1/2 chance for the following 2 scenarios:

scenario 1 : 1000x gem that will absorb billions of the cloud and decentralized computing business

scenario 2: token not needed / does not need value

its gonna be succesful either way.


based on the tokeneconomics report the rlc team wrote I tend to think they want this asset to gain value.

[Anonymous No.24191080]

>>24190887
yes

[Anonymous No.24191092]

>>24190887
Yes. Intel, Google, Alibaba, Amazon, EDF, Microsoft, and many more about to be scammed by iExec cause they can't get the booleans to start working and stop the metadatas from leaking through the USB input port

[Anonymous No.24191101]

no scam sir
https://openssf.org/about/members/

[Anonymous No.24191145]

>>24191048
>scenario 2: token not needed / does not need value
wont happen
world first decentralized way to share computing and data
gg
we win

[Anonymous No.24191151]

It’s a fucking scam you idiots.

[Anonymous No.24191171]

7 PhD Team
https://iex.ec/about-us/

Godlike CEO
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&hl=en

Intel
https://builders.intel.com/ai/membership/iexec
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/can-a-blockchain-controlled-robot-change-the-future.html
https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/new-confidential-computing-solutions-emerge-on-the-hyperledger-avalon-trusted-compute.html

IBM
https://twitter.com/ibmcloud/status/1067584636728082433
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing

Ubisoft
https://www.ubisoft.com/en-US/careers/gcdetail.aspx?id=321969

EU Commission
https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ontochain/

Memberships
https://confidentialcomputing.io/members/
https://openssf.org/about/members/
https://entethalliance.org/eea-members/

[Anonymous No.24191175]

>>24190887
i dont understand this shit. oil? can some explain this shit to me simply? what is it / how does it work

[Anonymous No.24191217]

>>24191029
oh so kind of like holochain? what makes this different from other decentralized computing projects?

[Anonymous No.24191249]

>>24191048
it's scenario 2, token NOT needed
looks like a security hidden behing a utility (eRLC)
not saying it's not bullish but token not needed for sure

[Anonymous No.24191264]

You would think if you are running a scam you would keep at least 30% of the RLC... tokenomics are so good in this case that, that alone is a proof it’s not a scam. Also if Mr. G wanted to scam he could promise and pump his coin already.

[Anonymous No.24191354]

>>24191217
Decentralised Cloud computating marketplace.

>Gilles has been working on this project since 2000
>AMF certification (European SEC)
>Coinbase listing imminent
>eRLC launch in Feb/March
>SEC certification coming
>V6

If you don't buy the next dip you'l regret.

[Anonymous No.24191402]

>>24191175
iExec isn't going anywhere because the framework is faulty.

The booleans have been a problem when you compile your Java code to JavaScript. It provokes a memory overflow in the container that leaks the booleans to the DNS. That's a big no for any Dapp. Honestly I really hope they find a solution to that otherwise an attacker could access the root on Ubuntu machines and easily leak metadatas through the SATA port.

The problem Gilles is facing here is a well known subset of the P versus NP problem, even Linus Torvald can't fix that easily. Their best hope is to use a distributed dockerized garbage collector and a zero knowledge algorithm to round float functions but that would remain a temporary solution.

I strongly advise to stay away from this project until they fix the problem (if they ever can since it's been a major problem to computing since decades).

[Anonymous No.24191417]

>>24191264
https://builders.intel.com/ai/membership/

Type "Blockchain" in the search bar. Thank me later.

[Anonymous No.24191513]

>>24191402
IN English doc

[Anonymous No.24191670]

>>24191151
swingie panic: the post

[Anonymous No.24191686]

>he didn't go all in when it dumped to 60c
ngmi

[Anonymous No.24191717]

>>24191175
Someone make a copypasta of this so normies can fucking understand

>RLC is digital oil because much like how regular oil helps create products and allow machinery to work, RLC does the same both trustlessly and digitally through allowing access to iExec. Real products can be created and computers/data/robots/AI can be "controlled" with it. RLC facilitates this by allowing access to iExec, which is the decentralized marketplace for cloud/ai/machine learning/robotics/dApps/compute/data/oracles/rendering and all things digital.
RLC can "power" machines. Imagine a solar powered cleaning robot(free power) being controlled by iExec. Owner of the robot profits in RLC while the customer gets the service.
Without RLC, and without iExec, the decentralized world computer marketplace can not exist.
Without RLC, there is no way to "power" iExec.
RLC is digital oil.

[Anonymous No.24191758]

>>24191217
Holochain had some deep technical problems, so no.

[Anonymous No.24191859]

>>24191717
Also I forgot to include that it's technically naturally scarce like oil.

[Anonymous No.24191912]

>>24191859
Why?

[Anonymous No.24191967]

Suicide stack is still 870? How much is a barrel? Is 1 RLC 1 barrel of digital oil? Thanks

[Anonymous No.24192057]

>>24191402
I think this is copypasta because it’s so retarded but if this is really your actual thoughts, just so you’re aware, you’re a total retard who doesn’t understand even the most basic aspects of computing

[Anonymous No.24192135]

>>24191912
Cause it's a premined shitcoin that got sold to their friends. That's why it's scarce

[Anonymous No.24192195]

>>24191092
>>24191402
>>24192135
Dogshit loser is seething right now

[Anonymous No.24192209]

>>24192057
how can you even think someone could be this stupid lmao

[Anonymous No.24192260]

In most of this defi scams they never explain whats the use of their token, i mean yay cloud computing but what gives value to the actual asset you are shillig?

[Anonymous No.24192307]

I overheard Gilles talking about the boolean problem at a French market on Friday. I was enjoying a nice plate of baguette and olive oil when I noticed my ears perked up when I heard his silky French voice. I immediately looked to my right and saw Gilles sitting there with Cabelguen(ultimate chad), discussing the boolean issue.
I went up to him and freaked out about the boolean problem telling him how it's making me poor but he didn't seem to care about that. He just kept sipping his soup scoffing and laughing at every word I said. Then all of a sudden Cabelguen(ultimate chad) stood up and ripped his shirt off while pushing me away hard. "OUI GET ZE FAK OUT OF HERE LITTLE PAJEET MAN GILLES HAS MORE IMPORTANT ZINGS TO WORK ON" he said as he pushed me very hard onto the streets of France. I looked at Gilles and asked "is it over, Gilles?", and Gilles gave me a hard wink while Cabelguen stood by his side, jawline intact, shirt off flexing his 6pack. The rest of the people in the market never seemed to notice what was going on, almost as if Cabelguen had some sort of trance spell on them all. I went home and IMMEDIATELY sold all 8700 of my RLCies to some tranny on binance. I later had nightmares of Gilles winking at me as I kept asking him if it's over or not, and Cabelguen running after me with an army of naked trannies.

Either the boolean problem is unsolvable and Gilles is running a racket, or Gilles is secretly an evil genius about to take over the world with a world computer that can attach to robots, AI, and traditional tech.
Either way, I sold everything. I cannot take part in this.

[Anonymous No.24192335]

>>24192260
are you fucking retarded lol

[Anonymous No.24192343]

>>24192260
What do you mean actual value? You can farm RLC as we speak on the public worker pool

[Anonymous No.24192406]

>>24191513
how about italian
It's a pasta

[Anonymous No.24192432]

>>24191912
Can't create any more digital oil but you can destroy it.
>>24192135
Premined doesn't matter. RLC is scarce and has staking. Imagine 1000000 computers staking 5 RLC each, oh wait they cant because theres only 87M tokens

[Anonymous No.24192461]

Only 87 million supply. 70 million currently circulating. Great tokenomics!

[Anonymous No.24192609]

>>24192461
>only 25M on exchanges
>most of those are held by users

[Anonymous No.24192641]

>>24191354
What dip are you talking about?
I'm with 201 barrels, but I want a clean 1000.

[Anonymous No.24192712]

>>24190887
100% scam. I heard they only have 6PhD in the team.

[Anonymous No.24192761]

I thought it was over for Gilles.
Whats the truth? Its twice as expensive to grab now as back then

[Anonymous No.24192812]

>>24190887
The iExec project is definitely ambitious. Don't know if they will succeed in creating this generalized framework for compute, with so freaking many moving parts and tech diversity out there.

Even if the project is a success, the RLC token does not have much utility. Even on the iExec website, it's use is "to pay with more simplicity to all participants in the network". It's a payment token. Not useless but not clear.

If I am a big company, and want to benefit from iExec, what prevents me from directly "contacting/paying the largest providers on the network" to avoid using RLC? Nothing !
It's the same than some other projects with similar token role.

ETH on the other hand is a real utility token, because it really gives you access to a decentralized service that exists only in this environment.

As opposed to that; LINK forced the use of their token to pay their oracles, but as their product is purely on-chain, it works...

iExec might achieve what they started. RLC might pump but it's really not clear if this token captures the value of its network

[Anonymous No.24192872]

>>24192812
Trash fud

[Anonymous No.24192964]

>>24192872

lol not even uncertainty. I'm stating fact and being rational (not a usually good strategy in crypto in general, that's for sure)

[Anonymous No.24193122]

>>24192812
>the RLC token does not have much utility.
It has the most utility of any crypto ever.
> it's use is "to pay with more simplicity to all participants in the network".
Yes, to allow for a decentralized network to exist you need a cryptocurrency.
>It's the same than some other projects with similar token role.
No other project is similar to iExec.
>ETH on the other hand is a real utility token
mysides.jpg
> because it really gives you access to a decentralized service that exists only in this environment.
Just like RLC does to allow access to iExec's environment
>As opposed to that; LINK forced the use of their token to pay their oracles
iExec oracles work the same way but are technologically better, check the latest tweet.

FUCK NOILERS

[Anonymous No.24193268]

>>24193122
Lol I wish you had any interesting arguments. Because I'm really following iExec but not saying anything showing why RLC is a good investment.

> It has the most utility of any crypto ever.
Lol.

> Yes, to allow for a decentralized network to exist you need a cryptocurrency.

Yes, ETH allow this network to exist. As to the distributed computing network above it, nope.

> No other project is similar to iExec.
Lol.

> Just like RLC does to allow access to iExec's environment

It does, but this environment is off chain computing services like AWS, Azure of Google Cloud. The value is the network but RLC is just a payment token that all participants agree to accept. It's not an intrinsic token like ETH with Ethereum.
Wish you had anything to say about that.

> iExec oracles work the same way but are technologically better, check the latest tweet.

I don't care about that, I don't doubt it, all other oracle tech is superior than Chainlink. Tellor, iExec or even Dia. All way superior, cheaper, and much more decentralized

[Anonymous No.24193328]

>>24192260
There's no current public worker pool you fucking buffoon

[Anonymous No.24193338]

>>24192432
Thats only 5 million mr. Ranjeet

Ive invested in a literal dumpster fire havent I

[Anonymous No.24193377]

>>24193268
>Lol.
Lol.
>Yes, ETH allow this network to exist. As to the distributed computing network above it, nope.
iExec RLC is blockchain agnostic. If ETH died, iExec would use another blockchain.

>Lol.
Lol.

>It does, but
BUT you're a fucking retard that doesn't understand the benefits of using iExec over AWS.

>I don't care about that, I don't doubt it, all other oracle tech is superior than Chainlink.

Then why bring it up like it's a point over iExec.

Oh, because you had 4 years FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.24193378]

>>24190887
No room in the manger. That ship has sailed. Move alone. Its not for you

[Anonymous No.24194010]

>>24193377

> iExec RLC is blockchain agnostic. If ETH died, iExec would use another blockchain.

You really are retarded or have too much invested in it.

Even if the network is blockchain agnostic, the cryptocurrency powering the decentralized part of the iExec network is the underlying token, whether it's now ETH, or later ALGO or ADA!

RLC captures almost no value.
Bro I'm from Lyon, the city iExec has their headquarters and talked with most of their devs. I know the project from the start and I support these guys.

But I won't buy this token. Have fun

[Anonymous No.24194125]

>>24194010
you worked at iexec or interviewed the devs?

[Anonymous No.24194132]

>>24194010
>You really are retarded or have too much invested in it.
Great retort retard, it's agnostic whether or not u want to cry about it
>Even if the network is blockchain agnostic, the cryptocurrency powering the decentralized part of the iExec network is the underlying token, whether it's now ETH, or later ALGO or ADA!
Not true, those are simply SETTLEMENT LAYERS, which are only initially used as iExec has a sidechain, and if any of them failed iExec would just switch, therefore NONE OF THEM MATTER.

>Bro I'm from Lyon
>I support these guys.
>But I won't buy this token. Have fun
you had 4 years

[Anonymous No.24194182]

>>24194132
to add more to the settlement layer part
>the cryptocurrency powering the decentralized part of the iExec network is the underlying token
is the most retarded thing I've ever heard
You can't use iExec without RLC. Period. ETH isn't going anywhere. ETH is the backbone for many great projects.

STAY POOR NOILER

[Anonymous No.24194199]

>the RLC token does not have much utility.

I don't want to put words in his mouth, but the anon was referring to the fact that the token is not necessarily an existensial necessity for the project to function as Ethereum. The token itself is like going to chuck e cheese, exchange money for the token and use their services. Get it?

[Anonymous No.24194267]

>>24194199
>but the anon was referring to the fact that the token is not necessarily an existensial necessity for the project to function as Ethereum.
Objectively false.
iExec cannot run without RLC.
You pajeets dont even know how crypto works kek

[Anonymous No.24194440]

>>24194182
>STAY POOR NOILER
We must create a new meme wave. Imagine a modified Steve Jobs slogan:
STAY POOR
STAY NOILER

[Anonymous No.24194553]

>>24194125

Also dev but not worked there, mostly interviewed the devs and had a few beer with some cools dude there

[Anonymous No.24194579]

>>24194553
>dev
>offers the most pajeet level understanding of iExec
Right dude, you still have time

[Anonymous No.24194607]

>>24194199

> The token itself is like going to chuck e cheese, exchange money for the token and use their services. Get it?

This. Simply put out

[Anonymous No.24194740]

>>24194607
>Goes to Ethereum e Cheese
>asks for decentralized cloud computing
>Ethereum cheese: "?????????"
this will probably go over your stupid head

[Anonymous No.24194853]

>>24194740

>Goes to Ethereum e Cheese
>asks for decentralized cloud computing
>Ethereum cheese: "?????????"

Lol.

Goes to Ethereum e Cheese network.
taste the cheese and love it
decide to order a million cheese
talks with main e Cheese producers and make OTC deal
Enjoy e cheese

[Anonymous No.24195017]

>>24194853
Damn you're stupid kek

[Anonymous No.24195106]

>>24195017

see you in 2023

[Anonymous No.24195128]

>>24195106
See you in q1 when you fomo at 10$

[Anonymous No.24195169]

Honestly i've been fudding iExec for last 6 months and i'll keep fudding until I get to at least 25,000 barrels

[Anonymous No.24195213]

>>24190927
>photo of shitcoin logo next to brand logos means it isn’t a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24195544]

>>24192432
Pajeet badhodler spotted

[Anonymous No.24195564]

>>24190927
what exactly does this picture signify????

[Anonymous No.24195671]

>>24190887
imagine thinking DIGITAL OIL is a scam
fucking retard, what do you want? digital battery? get the fuck out here nigger

[Anonymous No.24195921]

>>24192343
stop lying, you can't.

[Anonymous No.24195954]

>>24190887
Yes, it is scam. Too many threads. Pajeetery is obvious