It's there

[Anonymous No.24022161]

Nano is in front of everyone. But this shit is radical in term of attention, FOMO is either extreme or "the coin is dead".

Most people here will buy above $10.

This shit will hit 5B of market cap, at least.
Triple digits is a question of when, not if.

Yes, a x10 with BTC can be nice. But what about the next x100-x200 of this bull cycle?

Hope you are accumulating Anon

[Anonymous No.24022343]

>>24022161
Don't fall for the scam and fuck Colin, George and the rest of the rabid SJW redditors.
Here:
>>23901472

Pic, Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

[Anonymous No.24022342]

>>24022161
lmao, RailBlocks is a scam from 2017, many other scams from that time are gone like Safex or Signatum, just let it rest in peace like the other scams

[Anonymous No.24022358]

>>24022161
this is unironically a shit coin

[Anonymous No.24022368]

>>24022161
Pic, Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

[Anonymous No.24022401]

>>24022161
Nano is a scam by ultra-liberal SJW faggots. Here:
>>23901472

[Anonymous No.24022419]

Still the best p2p tech in the space despite butthurt people calling it a scam. Go figure.

[Anonymous No.24022460]

The people running this project are dumping on idiot bag holders every week, the coin is a low IQ database with nothing of value. The NF officers are SJW faggots that care more about forcing their gay social values on bagholders, than they do about making a good crypto. The coin is down 99.9% from ATH. SJW faggot devs are always arguing with idiots on twitter. SJW faggot devs are always showing off in social media.
Sorry OP, you got scammed into buying an SJW shitcoin. It's going to zero, so you'd be wise to sell while your portfolio is still worth something.

[Anonymous No.24022462]

So fucking bullshit when reading this worthless FUD ahaha

[Anonymous No.24022482]

>>24022161
I like this asset and I will holderino.

[Anonymous No.24022562]

>>24022419
>Still the best p2p tech in the space despite butthurt people calling it a scam.
Wrong. Your shitcoin can't even give 10% of your promised tps in 2017 and is still wide open for spam attacks crashing your shitcoin. There is no way in hell your shitcoin will ever be a global currency. Even former Nano core dev Zack Shapiro has no faith in Nano, pic.

[Anonymous No.24022606]

>>24022419
>>24022462
>>24022482
Within a few months, the insane Nano scammers will have burned through all their Nano Foundation funds. Leaving Nano as a half-finished crashed tech project, dead in the water. Super bullish, ryte guys? Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24022725]

>>24022562
>>24022562
This is again some BS. This is a purely theoretical discussion.

It's not clear why would LN become mainstream and widely adopted. I don't know anyone (me included) who would use LN on an everyday basis.

If LN is the best innovation for digital money, no thanks I prefer to use my fiat based apps like Venmo. It's just better.

NANO keep outperforming itself in performance and did 1400+ CPS (TPS with network finality !) on consumer hardware, without really reaching saturation theoretically.

If NANO grew larger and serious hardware were to be put on this network, it's max CPS would be far higher. Even though >1000 CPS is more than plenty these days.
+ I see the foundation running out of money as a positive.

Fully distributed, network is running for more than 4-5 years now.
The UX is a pleasure.

The only bet against NANO is to say that a 1990-like digital currency that is slow and not scalable is the only innovation brought by the crypto space. Allow me to doubt that

NANO is a good hold. Won't sell any before $20

[Anonymous No.24022781]

>>24022161
Fucking Reddit faggot. Stop shilling this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24022785]

>>24022725
I like nano too my fren. it might not be soon, but once the wars for actual peer to peer internet currency starts nano is a very good contender. not to mention DAG tech and fully distributed with no inflation. when i was doing tests this asset was one of my favorites.

Nano is very controversial cause its so different. I think its a good bet.
it fits perfectly in my diverse portfolio.

[Anonymous No.24022795]

>>24022606

Except Nano isn't a crashed tech project.

It works continuously and is a freaking pleasure to use.

It literally just needs to be picked up and used, like BTC.

[Anonymous No.24022829]

>>24022725
Dude just stop, you're obviously one of the fanatical reddit fags that will endlessly shill this coin. You've probably pissed off everyone on cc and can't find any other idiots to baghold your scam of a project on that website, so now you're trying to scam people on /biz/.
Your coin is dead. Fuck off. You've likely cost many people tens of thousands of dollars with your shameless shilling. Nano is old news and down 99%. It's done. It doesn't do anything impressive. Cut your losses and move on, and certainly don't drag other people down with you. The sooner you realize this the sooner you'll start making money again.

[Anonymous No.24022835]

>>24022725
>>24022795
>CPS (TPS with network finality !)
CPS is not the same as TPS, Nano scammer. TPS is roughly 50% of CPS.

>1000 CPS is more than plenty these days
Insane comment. That's only 500 TPS and even VISA is calibrated for 65 000 TPS, even though they are not designed to cover the unbanked and do micro-payments, as your Nano NF scammers claim regarding Nano.
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

>>24022795
Only reason why you have ever heard about Nano is that they lied about their 7000 tps, when BTC was clogged in Dec 2017. Pic. Why did Nano scammers lie about their tps?

[Anonymous No.24022916]

>>24022795
>>24022835
Here is sad reality. Not the promised 7000 tps they lied about, but a meager 75 tps. Rougly 1% of what the Nano dev scammers promised. What a joke. Then you have Nano dev's criminal involvment with Bitgrail.
Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

Nano was pushed by Italian scammers and lying devs. A clear pump and dump.
>Why Raiblocks (Nano) Will End as a Pump & Dump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jZ6ZfMYi14

[Anonymous No.24022924]

nano is pajet coin

[Anonymous No.24022966]

>>24022916
>Here is sad reality. Not the promised 7000 tps they lied about, but a meager 75 tps. Rougly 1% of what the Nano dev scammers promised. What a joke
Pic.

[Anonymous No.24022978]

>>24022161
get the fuck out you scamming italian piece of shit

[Anonymous No.24022984]

>>24022785

[Anonymous No.24023131]

>>24022835

Stop guys I'm not from Reddit, I only participate here as it's anonymous. I invested in ETH back in 2016, then now today in NANO and ALGO for example.

> CPS is not the same as TPS, Nano scammer. TPS is roughly 50% of CPS.

Are you dumb? "Confirmations Per Second (CPS) is the preferred measure of Nano scalability because TPS is a per-node measurement that can vary significantly. CPS is the rate at which the network as a whole confirms transactions, which is what really matters." CPS<TPS

> Insane comment. That's only 500 TPS and even VISA is calibrated for 65 000 TPS, even though they are not designed to cover the unbanked and do micro-payments

What, you think it's not good to bother with a 1000 TPS decentralized layer 1 when BTC is <10 TPS and ETH<20 TPS?

Do you think, just like that that Algorand with it's 1000-10000 is useless because it's not 75000 ?? it makes no sense, try to talk with more logic please or don't try.

ALL BLOCKCHAINS CAN IMPLEMENT A LIGHTNING NETWORK.
A better layer 1 is always better, period.
I think that's great and it would be a useful currency for millions of users. Try making more sense next time honestly.

[Anonymous No.24023272]

>>24022161
It is so cheap to attack this network for a well capitalized group, especially if an asic is invented. Just flood the network to its max capacity and watch as the dynamic proof of work adjusts upward to the point that honest users can't get their transactions through without outsourcing the proof of work. The whole feeless thing immediately breaks down when you can exploit the proof of work

[Anonymous No.24023294]

>>24023131
Stop lying, ignorant Nano scammer.

"Remember that even just 50 TPS (100 CPS)"
https://forum.nano.org/t/nano-stress-tests-measuring-bps-cps-tps-in-the-real-world/436

Only Nano morons compare with old tech BTC. They have something that you don't: security. Your scam project has no chance against newer tech projects like Solana, future ETH 2.0 with one million TPS, etc etc.

[Anonymous No.24023337]

>>24023131
Nano is not decentralized. Protocol updates happen frequently from an extremely small dev community, and proof of stake has never been demonstrated to be decentralized in the wild by any coin. All your stakers just end up on exchanges and they capture the network. In bitcoin at least there is somewhat of a checks and balances system between node operators and miners ( see user activated soft fork drama) and the extent of a 51% attack is limited only to censoring and not protocol violations due to a robust set of nodes, and transaction fees mitigate the censorship possibility because attacker only gets the dwindling block reward

[Anonymous No.24023500]

>>24023131
Lying, ignorant Nano findom cucks like you are so annoying. Go back to /r/NanoCircleJerk with your scam.

[Anonymous No.24023521]

>>24023337

Illusions and more illusions.

Bitcoin is backed only by people believing burning energy and fees is what secures a network. This is dumb.

> proof of stake has never been demonstrated to be decentralized in the wild by any coin

Proof of stakes works, because that's how the worlds currently works. Highest stakes decide the network, period. Mining gives the same results than proof of stake, but with extra steps, confusing everyone. People think making computers producing millions of hashes per minute is what makes a currency decentralized, wtf. I guess that's what happens when non-techies get involved with that.

NANO IS decentralized.
What's your argument? And what argument would that be, that is different than saying Ethereum 2.0 is not decentralized?

> Protocol updates happen frequently from an extremely small dev community
You lost absolutely your entire credibility.
Do you think Bitcoin never updated it's protocol? What you said is EXACTLY the same fucking situation than Bitcoin in its early years, and I was fucking there.

LMAO
Enjoy not ever using your brain guys

[Anonymous No.24023612]

>>24022562
>muh toxic bitcoin community
the only reason any other "community" is nicer is because that's a more effective strategy to shill their shitcoin scam is to be "nice"... None of the shitcoins have a reason to hate one another, but all resent the king and by extension bitcoiners who have continued to be right about bitcoin's dominance. If a bitcoiner explains what something is either shit or just not going to be able to rival bitcoin, we're called big toxic meanies. Part of the appeal of a sovereign money like this is that one doesn't have to play politics either, so a lot of the OGs in bitcoin give a shit about being diplomatic like a politician would be.

[Anonymous No.24023638]

>>24023612
*don't give a shit about being diplomatic

[Anonymous No.24023704]

>>24023612
Are you so stupid that you don't know about Nano's rabid anti-trump, anti-nationalist, open borders and Jewish grifter Zack Shapiro.

Fall guy and fired after Nano's fraud and involvement with Italian scammers were exposed. Here inform yourself:

Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanists
>>/biz/thread/16596049

[Anonymous No.24023734]

>>24023521
Yeah i would say ethereum 2.0 isn't decentralized either so nice try. What happens with proof of stake is that normal people won't do it, and exchanges will. Since there is no checks and balances from regular users the network gets captured and controlled by a small group of insiders.
In bitcoin miners cannot capture the network because they are limited to following the protocol due to users running full nodes or their blocks are orphaned. The most they can do is censor but transaction fees means that some miner will still include your transaction.
As for dev stuff goes, in the early days bitcoin did update a lot but that is slowing down and each update is getting massive amounts of technical review and debate. Nano is nowhere close to that stage and outside of a small handful of people barely anyone works on the protocol. So obviously it is more centralized. Not saying it won't improve in the future if more people learn it, but world isn't going to wait around for a science project to prove itself right now

[Anonymous No.24023771]

>>24023612
Nano has the worst community in crypto, with the lowest IQ, pic related

[Anonymous No.24023928]

>>24023704
You insulting me is kind of a random non-sequitur to my comment regarding one specific thing he said... I bought XRB when it was under a dollar and made 60k off it in 2017, but no I don't remember who this guy is nor do I care. Nano ain't ever going to moon again, and it amuses me I've probably made way more off it than anyone who holds it today and believes in it.

I don't even know know what happened with all the shitgrail lawsuits and what not, going into 2018 I forgot about it completely. Luckily I bought from Mercatox or whatever the fuck it was called... Funny at the time I thought I was going with the shittiest and shadier of the two exchanges.. lol

>>24023771
I mean the bitgrail buyers getting so utterly and completely btfo tore the "community" apart, most everyone who fucked by shitgrail partly blamed the devs and just started to attack the project which they previously were shilling. It was absolutely brutal and one of the most epic implosions of a crypto. Those former shitgrail buyers who got ripped off salted the earth against nano ever regaining credibility or popularity amongst shitcoiners.

[Anonymous No.24023953]

> In bitcoin miners cannot capture the network because they are limited to following the protocol due to users running full nodes or their blocks are orphaned. The most they can do is censor but transaction fees means that some miner will still include your transaction.


This is the core of the "btc maximalist propaganda" IMO.
Validators of Algorand or Ethereum (for example) are also limited to following the protocol, with mining or no mining.

Basically that, a consensus always happens fundamentally at the same level, wheter it stems from finding a solution to a hashing problem (mining) or just voting securely on transactions.
Mining and cryptographic hashes doesn't magically make a network resilient AF.

In Nano, validators have exactly the same power than in Bitcoin, they can censor if they collude, but if most of the network is honest (logical assumption made by 100% of all decentralized projects) they will just vote to prevent any double spending. (By the way, a large part of the NANO FUD is that there is no double spending prevention - which is a lie , it never happened so far)

[Anonymous No.24024195]

>>24023928
>I bought XRB when it was under a dollar and made 60k off it in 2017, but no I don't remember who this guy is nor do I care
>t. Gambler, not investor

[Anonymous No.24024546]

nano is an ultimate reddit shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.24024738]

>>24022161
this is one of the most useless coins to exist

[Anonymous No.24025600]

Nano is actually pretty nice, people keep calling it a scam because they are in too deep in ponzis

[Anonymous No.24026307]

>>24025600
Delusional.

>At least us Nano hodlers (2,4% of ATH) paid for some social impact 4 women, and that's at least something...r..r..r.ight guys??

[Anonymous No.24026477]

>>24024546
Do yourself a favor and check the coin supply before you spew garbage.

[Anonymous No.24026640]

>>24026477
go back to reddít soibeard noob

[Anonymous No.24026644]

Man, those were the days - still have my 5 BTC from this pump, the other 3 are sub .1 nowadays

[Anonymous No.24026724]

The amount of reddit spacing in this thread

[Anonymous No.24027000]

>>24024195
It's not gambling. I could tell XRB was going to moon for quite a few reasons after I watched the market for a good while. A lot of narratives were lining up to where it was likely going to be the next moonshot, for example at the time IOTA mooning was in people's minds and a lot were discussing XRB as being "the next IOTA" due to it being similar in some ways.

I missed the boat on shitcoins that I thought were going to moon but I never had the gumption to pull the trigger on, so when I got that same intuition with Raiblocks I decided I'd take the risk. So it wasn't some random gamble but rather careful study of the sort of speculation that was going on at that time where I had "dry runs" of testing my observational skills and understanding of the market for pulling the trigger on a shitcoin. S I just preempted many other people's speculation by knowing what narratives the market would find attractive at the time. It's short term nihilistic speculation perhaps, but not gambling. I knew what was important about the market at the time, long term belief in the project was irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.24027179]

this shitcoin has plateued. it basically has reached its peak in terms of technological innovation it can offer and still no1 cares? thats a big tell.

[Anonymous No.24027186]

>>24027000
>So it wasn't some random gamble but rather careful study
Careful study, yet having no clue who Zack Shapiro is? Are you high or just lying, Nano scammer?

Pic, two Nano Jews.

[Anonymous No.24027316]

I only put $1000 in NANO so if it crashes I don't care, but if it reaches $5B+ market cap then I will make a lot of money.

[Anonymous No.24027371]

>>24027186
I was only familiar with the creator, but years later I don't even remember the creator of Raiblocks name... If that's him he looks different now. It is the sort of detail I would have considered of relatively low importance given like I said I didn't even believe in the project long term at all but was just flipping it. I vaguely remember Zack's name now that I'm thinking about it more, but it's been awhile.

[Anonymous No.24027629]

>>24027316
>then I will make a lot of money.
Just as you did after BCC (Bitconnect) and OneCoin crashed, right? Great investor strategy there, Nanoid.

[Anonymous No.24027660]

>>24027316
>i only put 1000$ in [INSERT SHITCOIN NAME HERE] so if it crashes I don't care, but if it reaches $5B+ market cap then I will make a lot of money.

[Anonymous No.24028184]

>>24027371
>I was only familiar with the creator,
That would be findom cuck and ultra-liberal scammer Colin, pic related.

[Anonymous No.24028581]

>>24022161
Fantom is like Nano except it also has smart contracts on a DAG structure.
But its still shit, no one uses it, just like no one uses Nano.
Its probably wise to gamble with new altcoins, that haven't had their pump and dump cycle yet.
Or maybe don't bother with altcoins at all and just go margin long on Bitcoin if you want to take more risk.

[Anonymous No.24028909]

Can people stop bumping this shit thread. These scammers don't deserve any more attention.
>sage

[Anonymous No.24028982]

>>24022161
YES!!! Nano willl MOOON!!! and anyone who cant see that are IDITOS!!!

[Anonymous No.24028987]

Shills are SEETHING. Still have my 70k stack of Nano, as it is one of the only coins with a real world use case, being used right now. The network effect of this being used as the tipping currency of the internet will be profound and all encompassing. Nano will eventually be number one.

[Anonymous No.24028995]

bought some nano now that it's cheap, probably I'll hold until the network shuts down

[Anonymous No.24029018]

>>24022368
FUCK U!!!!
your just a jealous idiot for not investing, NANO is the best and we will be loyal not matter what .... ur a INCEL!!!!

[Anonymous No.24029096]

Raiblocks is and has always been a /biz/ coin. Cope harder faggots, your scams are drying up and only true projects that offer value will survive. Alt season is coming, but not for every alt.

[Anonymous No.24029157]

>>24029096
I mean, it has real world application, that's enough to be better than bitcoin imo. Countries suffering with hyperinflation may start to use it. And it's really cheap right now, it's less than a dollar

[Anonymous No.24029418]

>>24029157
What interests me is it replacing any and all tipping pseudocurrencies used such as those that streamers accept, allowing for microtransactions that can be converted into actual dollars, while remaining permissionless. The instant nature of the transactions is just icing on the cake, but one can easily see the use case of such a system for machine to machine and IoT based technology. Nano could very well become the caloric unit of energy of the internet. The implications of this stacked onto the BTC like nature of the protocol is immense and far larger than what BTC alone is capable of.

[Anonymous No.24029433]

What to expect over the Injective Protocol and StaFi Protocol's partnership is cross-chain staking and yield farming opportunities, guys get ready we're going to Farm

[Anonymous No.24029461]

Colin will be arthurs bunkmate in a few years

[Anonymous No.24029682]

scam

[Anonymous No.24029724]

>>24028987
he literally said NANO isn't supposed to rise in value. You absolute retards

[Anonymous No.24029812]

>>24029724
He is talking about fees, retard

[Anonymous No.24030140]

>>24026477
Doesn't make it any less reddit-esque, you faggot
Go back

[Anonymous No.24030791]

>>24030140
>something something reddit
>1 post by this ID
The shills are salty

[Anonymous No.24030856]

>>24029812
nope

[Anonymous No.24031011]

Pajeets HATE him! See how this one WEIRD trick completely eliminates fees and solves scalability!

[Anonymous No.24031163]

>>24030856
Yes he is you absolute fucking monkey, he talks about "fee collecting" holy shit learn to read

[Anonymous No.24031321]

i have known amount or nanoos

[Anonymous No.24031430]

just bought 10k because of this thread. can't substantiate any of the fud, but they've broke 1500 tps (cps? whatever) on the newest beta. no other project can do 1/10th of that feelessly and instantly

colin is a total liberal cuck though.. so are 99% of software engineers. your testosterone takes a nose dive when you stare at monitors all day.

[Anonymous No.24031666]

If you want to know why shill and pajeets hate this coin, it is simple. No mining. No ICO. No central group with a large supply with an incentive to shill.

Growth will happen naturally, as it should. In terms of popularity and discussion, and community outreach, the coins are tiered as follows: BTC -> ETH -> XRP -> NANO -> CHAINLINK. Depending on where you pull these metrics from, Chainlink and Nano can be swapped. Seeing as Nano is no longer a top 10 coin, but rather is at rank 97 last time I checked, it has the greatest profit margin potential of all of them by these metrics. This is not even considering the technological aspects and benefits it can provide to society as a whole.

[Anonymous No.24031728]

>>24031666
This post has been approved by the Nano Satanic Esoteric division, ltd. All rights reserved.

[Anonymous No.24031756]

>>24022161
Fud this shit. Were not done accumulating. Shut the fuck and stop giving newfags money

[Anonymous No.24031800]

>>24031728
Lol DAGboi doing the lords work. Hope he hasn't necked himself yet. Kek

[Anonymous No.24031807]

>>24031756
If you don't have your stack already I don't know what to tell you. It is better for the future global currency to be distributed in small amounts, rather than to be hoarded by whales. Then again, who am I to talk as I own close to 70k nanners.

But really, 133 Nano is all you need to make it. 133 Nano = 21 BTC.

[Anonymous No.24031937]

>>24031756
Well, its cheap as fuck right now, ATL if I'm not mistaken

[Anonymous No.24032228]

>>24031666
This.
Pajeets can't stand NANO because NANO is the white man's coin.

[Anonymous No.24032303]

>>24031807
133 is the suicide stack. Whats the make it stack.

[Anonymous No.24032307]

>>24032228
SIG

[Anonymous No.24032403]

>>24032303
maybe 1k idk, thats what I'm aiming for

[Anonymous No.24032443]

>>24032303
Depends what you consider a make it amount. If Nano reaches Chainlink's market cap, it would be worth $38.00 each at standard prices. It wasn't too long ago when these two coins were on opposite ends of the CMC rank either. If Nano were to reach LTC's market cap, it would be worth $2,500 per Nano. 1000 Nano at this price would be 2.5 mil.

[Anonymous No.24032474]

>>24032443
*BTC not LTC, LTC would be similar to Link, a bit under $40 per. A 40x is not that unrealistic for the top tech in the space.

[Anonymous No.24032571]

And lets be honest too, a lot of people have their eyes on Nano. The fud is evident of this, as is the community engagement. It was known by those more experienced that Nano was going to crash after its historic rise in value from 10 cents to 37 US dollars. Many sold for this reason, and for the upcoming BTC bull run. But once alts start rising, and once it is obvious Nano is about to start its run, all of those on the sidelines will start buying back in. If you have weak hands, perhaps it is best to wait until there is upwards movement. But chances are, you are not going to get in as close to the bottom as if you buy in now.

[Anonymous No.24032641]

>>24032571
How many months of accumulating you think there will be, senpai? I give it 1 or 2 years

[Anonymous No.24033116]

>>24032641
I honestly think its going to explode soon. There is a correlation with the demand for something like Nano with the rise of BTC and the associated fees. When people have to pay $50-$100 to send a single BTC transaction, they are going to look for alternatives. For those who actually care about what makes BTC a true cryptocurrency, they will find Nano. I would look for the rise of BTC, followed by the rise of LTC, and afterwards we will see the rise of coins like XRP, and then Nano. The difference between XRP and Nano however, is that the Nano devs don't have a large portion of the supply to offload, being that 100% of the supply has been distributed already, there will be no downward sell pressure, aside from the measly 400,000-600,000 the devs still possess. Which is less than a half of a single percent of the supply.

[Anonymous No.24033196]

Another thing I notice, when threads get posted here, or even better, when someone gives away single nano or even fractions to anons here, I tend to notice the price movement go upwards. I think the low liquidity at the moment has a lot to do with this, but the simple and easily understood and experimented with model allows those foreign to Nano to see just how well it works. It is one of the easiest cryptocurrencies to introduce others too, and seeing that most if not all weak hands are out, it really has nowhere to go but up. We just need to make the effort and to not feed the obvious trolls. Nano is much like the early days of BTC in many ways.

[Anonymous No.24033278]

>>24033196
nice

[Anonymous No.24033284]

>>24033116
XRP, XLM, LTC, BCH, XMR...
There are plenty of alternatives with <$0.01 fees with greater adoption and without the scummy devs. Nano is useless.

[Anonymous No.24033323]

>>24022161
go back

[Anonymous No.24033396]

>>24033284
>XRP = Centralized shitcoin the devs hold majority share over
>XLM = same shit different branding
>LTC = cannot scale, same as BTC
>BCH = can scale better, but still unable to meet market demand of use of a currency
>XMR = based, but more resource intensive than BTC, and also suffers scaling issues

Nano solves the cryptocurrency trilemma, that being finding a balance between being decentralized, scalable, and secure.

[Anonymous No.24033633]

Its funny how nano fudders provide no arguments

[Anonymous No.24034248]

>>24033284
Scummy kek. Stay poor DAGboi.

[Anonymous No.24034452]

you guys can keep seething all day, but there's nothing like nano. nano was created from satoshi's idea for a bitcoin replacement (threads are on bitcointalk and not hard to find), and it works shockingly well. so well that no body even believes it yet.

[Anonymous No.24034895]

>When someone makes a Nano thread

[Anonymous No.24034948]

>>24031728
Yeah, the usual satanist Nano moron trying to pretend to be me. That's how pathetic and scammy you Nanoid losers are. Tragic. Are you the idiotic rockmesockmplesus or do you have multiple satanists in your Nano loser team? And why so many gays?

[Anonymous No.24034997]

>>24029096
>Raiblocks is and has always been a /biz/ coin
Raiblocks yes, Nano no. Nano is a pure /r/NanoCircleJerk coin. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24035001]

>>24034948
>NANO SATANISTS
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.24035078]

>tfw the US Airforce is going to air bomb the Satanic Nano foundation HQ on behalf of DAG

[Anonymous No.24035089]

>>24031807
>But really, 133 Nano is all you need to make it. 133 Nano = 21 BTC.
As always, the stupidity and imbecilic "analysis" behind you Nano plebbitbois is just breathtaking. Your comment and pic related.

Using your insane para-logical "analysis" BCC (Bitconnect) is an even better deal than Nano.

10 BCC = 21 BTC

[Anonymous No.24035102]

>>24034948
God you're so pathetic it actually makes me feel better about myself thank you DAGboi

[Anonymous No.24035109]

>>24022161
Flawed tech. Only newfags and reddit falls for it.

[Anonymous No.24035117]

>>24035089

[Anonymous No.24035191]

>>24029724
>>24029812
No, he is whining and bitching about value fluctuation and ramble on that you insane Nano moonbois is the *real* reason why Nano has zero market penetration. He blames it all on you idiots. He hates you even more than the "misogynists" he rambles on and on about all the time. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24035256]

>>24035191
t. literal retard

[Anonymous No.24035260]

>>24035102
>>24035117
>God you're so pathetic it actually makes me feel better about myself thank you DAGboi
I did a 24x on DAG, what about you two homos and your 2.4% from ATH Nano shitcoin? Please tell me.

[Anonymous No.24035304]

>>24035260
>muh US airforce contracts
>muh vaporware scamcoin
>muh no liquidity so cannot sell
>muh satanic nanoids

[Anonymous No.24035368]

>>24035304
You are pretending to be NatSoc and your coin is the worst soiboi coin in the history of plebbit? How do you like Nano's many diversity hire and #WomenInTech, homo? Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24035405]

>>24035368
It's almost as if the project is decentralized and open source

[Anonymous No.24035495]

>>24032228
>>24032307
>Pajeets can't stand NANO because NANO is the white man's coin.
Ryte. Nano is ultraliberal and rabidly supports BLM, diversity, open borders and multiculturalism. See pic and take that dildo up your ass. Take your deranged lies and crack pot delusions back to plebbit.

[Anonymous No.24035571]

>>24035405
Nano Foundaton has been dumping tens of millions of Nano on you gay nano paypigs to pay for pic related and others. At least you supported ultra-radical feminism, BLM and diversity, right findom Nano cuck?

[Anonymous No.24035665]

>>24035571
The devs have less than 1% of the total supply and it's running out, lol cope harder faggot

[Anonymous No.24035702]

>>24029157
>Countries suffering with hyperinflation may start to use it
No, they will use stable coins backed by assets, and not some childish hobby coin Colin made on his kitchen table. You didn't even have a full time dev before late 2017. Your crashed tech is a clear witness that Nano is amateur hour from hell. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24035728]

>>24035495
nano is open source. nf has less than 400k in funds. 400k is what i make in a fucking year doing nothing working in google sheets bossing idiot developers around. this confirms you're all poor pajeets fudding

[Anonymous No.24035733]

>>24035368
But that's a man.

[Anonymous No.24035767]

>>24035665
You are confusing devs with Nano Foundation. George and Colins have tens of millions of Nanos. They will keep dumping you Nano paypigs into oblivion, as they have done since 2017. Pic related. Enjoy that 2.4% from ATH shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.24035814]

>>24035767
imagine living in your basement so long that traveling must mean you have 100m usd in crypto

i can buy a $100 camera and a $200 ticket to any dog shit retard city for instagram. go outside pajeet

[Anonymous No.24035844]

>>24029418
Your tech will crash with that kind of traffic. You have zero protection against spam. Nano is a joke.

[Anonymous No.24036150]

Buying because FUD is trash

Literally worse than UNI FUD

Thanks dude

[Anonymous No.24036281]

>>24036150
>Buying more BCC, Nano and OneCoin cuz FUD is trash!!

>Literally worse than UNI FUD!!!!

>Thanks dude


>t. Discord tranny from plebbit, pic related.
>Pretending to be from biz with *heavy plebbit spacing*

[Anonymous No.24036350]

>>24035844
Spam and crash it then retard. You can send .0000000000001 nano back and forth with near instant confirmation for free, so surely it wouldn't be outside your expenses to do so. And you of all people have a bone to pick with the Nano protocol. So put your rupees where your mouth is.

[Anonymous No.24036369]

>>24035665
Let me get this straight, so for you Nano homos, that your scammer devs and bikini blogger COO burns through tens of millions of USD in a short time and will go bankrupt in a few months time, is a GOOD thing? Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24036401]

>>24036369
Looks comfy, like my stack.

[Anonymous No.24036461]

I'm sitting on 500 NANO I bought around .75. My schizo friend says this fucker will be like $1000 in five years so I told him I'll give him 50 NANO if it ever hits that. Anyway, thanks for reading my blog, NANO is a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.24036504]

>>24036350
You have routinely network crash, Nano homo. Just go to your own discord and see for yourself. Last crash costed only 3 USD. What a joke.

Pic, a big thank you to all you pay pigs ...eh.... Nano fans.....for your kind donations...eeeeh, "investments".... Nano Foundation couldn't have done it without you!!

[Anonymous No.24036514]

im gonna take a nap, please keep this thread up because I want to read more insane ramblings from nano fudder when I wake up. Meth is bad mmkay,

[Anonymous No.24036701]

>>24031011
>>24033396
You have no clue what you are talking about. It's not about "balance". If ALL three factors are shit, they are balanced, but network is worthless, like Nano.

The Scalability Trilemma, a term coined by Vitalik Buterin, refers to the tradeoffs that blockchain based projects must make when deciding how to optimize the underlying architecture of their own blockchain. Vitalik knew long time ago that Nano devs were lying through their teeth about 7000 tps, when the sad reality was only 75 tps. Pic.

Nano is a crashed scam.

[Anonymous No.24036922]

>>24031430
>feelessly
It's only feeless because according to Nano's insane "business model", all costs and work must be placed on voluneers that will do it all for free 24/7/365 with no downtime ever.

I can also have a free public toilet service as a business model, where volunteers are buying the toilets and washing them for free 24/7. It's pure insanity.

[Anonymous No.24036938]

I got caught holding a bag when it listed on Binance. Would be a glorious day to see the meme coin overtake this piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.24036962]

>>24036701
Your life must be so pathetic. So much energy into putting FUD into one coin. Seems life you have nothing going in life. Wish you luck DAGboi you'll need it.

[Anonymous No.24037024]

>>24036922
yet it's more decentralized than bitcoin and works flawlessly. stop being angry over something you have no hand in, it's not healthy

[Anonymous No.24037025]

>>24036922
If you have a business relying on the networks it seems logical to contribute to a network. You're just grasping at straws at this point

[Anonymous No.24037029]

>>24035728
>this confirms you're all poor pajeets fudding
This makes zero sense. Are you unable to use basic logic? Bitconnect and Nano are highly correlated for a reason. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24037067]

>>24036701
that's from awhile ago. beta cracked 1500 c/tps. you're all extremely triggered about it, but i dunno why still

[Anonymous No.24037073]

>>24036962
>So much energy into putting FUD into one coin.
if it saves an anon from losing all his money in a scam then it's worth it

[Anonymous No.24037099]

>>24036962
You Nano discord trannies always come as a rat pack and flood biz. You never dare to come along and you can't defend your shitcoin with facts and logic, so you must try to flood. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.24037191]

>>24036962
You Nano discord trannies always come as a rat pack and flood biz. You never dare to come alone and you can't defend your shitcoin with facts and logic, so all you have is ad hominem and flooding. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.24037272]

>>24037067
>that's from awhile ago. beta cracked 1500 c/tps. you're all extremely triggered about it, but i dunno why still
That's 1500 cps, around 750 TPS. I.e. around 10% of what your lying Nano scammer devs promised December 2017.

[Anonymous No.24037406]

>>24032443
>>24032474
>>24032571
>>24032641
>>24033116
>>24033196
>>24033278
>>24033633
>>24034248
>>24034452
STILL the insane Nanoids are rambling on about Nano having same market cap as Litecoin. Just like the idiots did two years ago, with pure delirium spewing nonsense like 1000 USD EOY!!! Just bougth 500K nannis and tons of ad hominem attacks. Pic related. Most pathetic and delusional community in crypto. A gang of angry, low IQ and rekt Nano bagholders.

[Anonymous No.24037469]

>>24037191
I seriously hope nobody falls for this scamcoin. The shilling done by this group is fanatical. I cant even imagine how much damage they must've done by now to new investors.

[Anonymous No.24037527]

>>24035814
>t. angry and rekt Nano bagholder unable to defend his crashed shitcoin with facts and logic.

[Anonymous No.24037606]

>>24037067
explain to me where you're seeing that tps is half a cps

>>24037527
you get permabanned from cryptocurrency sub for even mentioning nano how the fuck is it reddit's coin kek

[Anonymous No.24037650]

>>24037272
tps = cps. nano isn't bitcoin https://docs.nano.org/glossary/#confirmations-per-second-cps

[Anonymous No.24037688]

colin absolutely let's other redditors fuck his girlfriend, and that red headed slut deserves to get allah'd. but bitcoin also isn't going to get overthrown by nano. you all need to stop being triggered and just get rich. you deserve it anons

[Anonymous No.24037693]

>>24036938
This fork of Nano is the way. Get some Banano before it moons guys!

[Anonymous No.24037694]

>>24037024
So how large a portion of the initial Nano distribution did Colin and his friends have? 60%? 70%? Any question regarding hard data related to Nano's initial distribution will get you insta-banned on discord, plebbit etc. They moved millions around on Bitgrail, both before and after bankruptcy. Colin refuses to answer any questions and giving empirical data regarding distribution, and he and his friends have been dumping Nano into oblivion since Jan 2017

Colin said he would release a financial statement for Nano Foundation some months ago. Of course, he lied. At least he now is saying a big fuck you to the desperate and moronic Nano community publicly. He is using Nano Foundation's money in private lawsuits, slushing money to George Coxon - buying her crashed companies and paying corruption money to Espen Enger, so he would protect them from any lawsuit from the Bitgrail Victim group.

>>24037025
>If you have a business relying on the networks it seems logical to contribute to a network.
Just as logical as buying free toilets and wash them for free all day long for nothing cuz "common good". Didn't you learn game theory at your Mickey Mouse shit business school?

Hope you idiots enjoy your Nano support for trannies. Remember you are paying for it. Pic.

[Anonymous No.24037753]

>>24037469
Very true, anon. Most likely they scare the living daylight out of potential investors with their rabid Bitconnect style shilling

[Anonymous No.24037776]

>>24037527
sounds more like you are the angry one here

[Anonymous No.24037839]

>>24037606
You need two confirmations for one transaction.

>you get permabanned from cryptocurrency sub for even mentioning nano how the fuck is it reddit's coin kek
Your comment only makes logical sense if /r/cc is the ONLY subreddit and /r/NanoCircleJerk and others do not exist.

Time for you scammers to ramble on about paypal again. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24037902]

>>24037650
>tps = cps. nano isn't bitcoin https://docs.nano.org/glossary/#confirmations-per-second-cps
Moron. Idiot scammer. Here:

"Remember that even just 50 TPS (100 CPS)"
https://forum.nano.org/t/nano-stress-tests-measuring-bps-cps-tps-in-the-real-world/436

[Anonymous No.24037960]

Pic Nano's Chief Operating Officer showing Colin, Nano findom "investors" and all the "misogynists" in the tech industry her...ahem.. "job qualifications" as a Chief Operating Officer (COO) for a 4,5 Billion USD ATH Mcap crypto project.

[Anonymous No.24038226]

>>24022368
>>24022401
>>24022562
>>24022606
>>24022835
>>24022916
>>24022966
>>24022984
>>24023294
>>24023500
>>24023704
>>24023771
>>24024195
>>24026307
>>24027186
>>24027629
>>24028184
>>24034948
>>24034997
>>24035089
>>24035191
>>24035260
>>24035368
>>24035495
>>24035571
>>24035702
>>24035767
>>24035844
>>24036281
>>24036369
>>24036504
>>24036701
>>24036922
>>24037029
>>24037191
>>24037272
>>24037406
>>24037527
>>24037606
>>24037694
>>24037753
>>24037839
>>24037902
>>24037960

The marks of a psychopath. How much money did you lose on BitGrail?

[Anonymous No.24038376]

>>24038226
I knew about the TPS lie from Nano pre-Bitgrail and got my assets/profit out. When the scam/crash happened, I had to watch people losing all their money, some talked about suicide and some very likely did commit suicide. I tried to help as many as I could and many wanted to organize donations etc but we got zero help from Nano Foundation. They kicked all discussion about Bitgrail from their plebbit page and refused to do anything to help the victims. There are numerous ways and technical solutions they could have done to help the victims and offset their losses. They did nothing and instead jumped into an orgy of hedonism, woke hard left hypocrisy and pushing hard for feminism/BLM/womenintech/globohomo etc. I am so disgusted. After that, the Bitgrail victims got scammed again by Nano Foundations dirty deal with Espen Enger, only to have Bitgrail victims scammed a third time when Espen Enger exit scammed with their donations.

To have these dirty Nano lefties running around lecturing other people about decency and morality is just disgusting. Pic.

[Anonymous No.24038414]

>>24037776

[Anonymous No.24038898]

Bikini Blogger George Coxon, COO of Nano, with zero experience, connections, or tech knowledge, is a rabid hard left open borders feminist.

Her LinkedIn likes include:
>Muslim invader and Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan
>World Economic Forum
>IMF's Christine Lagarde
>BBC
>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
>and more pure globohomo and hard left persons/organizations

#WomenInTech #BLM #OpenBordersNOW #Diversity

[Anonymous No.24039016]

>>24038898
Nothing says "open borders" and "progressive leftie" as a trip in your private jet.

[Anonymous No.24039212]

Easy for hard lefties dictate the plebs to eat their bugs and open their borders, when your daily life is like this, - pic from Coxon's instagram and paid for by Nano's findom "investors"

[Anonymous No.24039406]

Life is goooooOOooOoood when you can dump on Nano simps and burn through their Nano dev fund in a matter of 3 years, only a few months left before bankruptcy.

[Anonymous No.24039500]

From three years solo traveler (we all know what that means...) with zero qualifications to COO for a 4,5 Billion mcap ATH crypto project. It's apparently so tough for women in tech to get a job that she has been a guest speaker at multiple feminist and EU conferences.
https://twitter.com/nano/status/1225171755523878912

[Anonymous No.24039552]

Hope you Nanoids are OK with woke globohomo Colin using Nano Foundation funds to pay for personal lawsuits involving his divorce etc.

#WokeNano #paypigs

[Anonymous No.24039580]

bro, look at that coins chart. Its dead. You are in denial.

[Anonymous No.24039605]

>The Tragic Story of Espen Enger

Nano Foundation and Espen Enger have a very shady and dark history before Espen Enger decided to exit scam with the Bitgrail Victim's money:

>Nano's core dev Shapiro, despite knowing about Bitgrail's problems did multiple times publicly endorse Bitgrail and encouraged people to invest and convinced them to stay in, to not sell their Bitgrail.
>Tens of thousands of people who would have got out ended up losing everything because of this.
>There were people who committed suicide as a consequence of this
>While key Nano dev Shapiro was telling concerned investors not to worry (as normal investors had their accounts and ability to withdraw frozen) the Nano devs and their friends were withdrawing and funneling out tens of millions of dollars, both before and after the "hack" was publicly known
>These are the people Espen Enger sold out to and banned Bitgrail victims from criticising.

Espen Enger
>Enger promised 100% transparency and to fight for the interests of the Bitgrail victims
>Very soon he had a meeting with Nano foundations lawyer - the outcome and contents of the meeting remain a secret to date.
>Soon after the meeting with Nano Foundation, he got non Bitgrail mods to monitor discord and ban/silence any actual Bitgrail victims who were critical of the Nano devs and the Nano team’s involvement
>Espen Enger said that he just "knew" that the Bitgrail victims had no legal case against Nano Foundation, so he decided to protect the Nano Foundation
>Nano foundation still won’t answer questions regarding (a) what the meeting with Espen Enger was about (b) how much money they paid him and (c) what happened to the money

>It is now clear that Espen Enger had a dirty deal to protect Nano Foundation, exit scammed, lost 100 BTC due to bad trades, and then committed suicide
Espen Børke Enger site:https://jolstad.vareminnesider.no/

[Anonymous No.24039637]

>>24038898
Schools meals are a luxury, how retarded do you have to be. Packing a lunch is fucking normal shit in Britain, for like what over a hundred years.

[Anonymous No.24039777]

While Nano investors lost 170 million USD thanks to Nano Foundation (NF) and Italian Bitgrail scammers, George Coxon and the rest of NF couldn't care less.

Pic related, summer 2018. Why Bitgrail victims accepted the open fraud and economic crime from both NF and Bomber/Bitgrail, is hard to understand.

Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

[Anonymous No.24039825]

no body cares about colin and his slut anon. the tech is legit, just get in while there's time

[Anonymous No.24039955]

>>24039825
>the tech is legit, just get in while there's time
Nano only has 10% of the TPS that they lied about in late 2017. There is no way in hell you can be a global currency doing micro payments with 750 TPS, constant network crashes and no real world spam protection. Add to that a nearlly bankrupt Nano Foundation and you know that your crashed tech wreck is dead in the water. Only slowly fading away towards zero like Bitconnect and OneCoin.

[Anonymous No.24039977]

>>24022161
BACK TO PLEBIT

[Anonymous No.24039983]

Why would woke globohomo and hard lefties like George Coxon and Colin care about some Nano paypig plebs lost 170 millions of their hard earned money? Pic related from George Coxon's Instagram

[Anonymous No.24040215]

>>24022916
The woman feminazi Colin is so desperately defending here against "misogyny", is his Chief Operating Officer, a bikini blogger with NO relevant business background, NO relevant education, NO relevant business contacts, NO relevant tech background. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24040295]

So how large a portion of the initial Nano distribution did Colin and his friends have? 60%? 70%? Any question regarding hard data related to Nano's initial distribution will get you insta-banned on discord, plebbit etc. They moved millions around on Bitgrail, both before and after bankruptcy. Colin refuses to answer any questions and giving empirical data regarding distribution, and he and his friends have been dumping Nano into oblivion since Jan 2017

Colin said he would release a financial statement for Nano Foundation some months ago. Of course, he lied. At least he now is saying a big fuck you to the desperate and moronic Nano community publicly. He is using Nano Foundation's money in private lawsuits, slushing money to George Coxon - buying her crashed companies and paying corruption money to Espen Enger, so he would protect them from any lawsuit from the Bitgrail Victim group.

[Anonymous No.24040384]

>One anon said this:
Nano's network literally does not work right now. They have delayed pushing epoch upgrade blocks because they have been disabled on so many exchanges.
Literally one dude with a mid range you can bring their entire network to it's knees right now by spamming.
They introduced a bug in v21.1 and if any account deadlocks the whole node does.

It is pretty basic in their pursuit of efficiency they mashed all the threads together which means if confirmations are behind on hundereds of thousands of blocks on one account they stop confirming for all accounts.
To spam hundereds of thousands of blocks takes a 200 dollar Nvidia card and a couple hours.
Some dude just optimized the opencl driver to for Blake2b so possibly a couple minutes.

The key takeaway is they have no anti spam measures in place the nodes never shit list another node (BTC did this shit back in like 2012). So one dude with a mid range GPU can totally cripple the whole network right now.
They guy who works on brainboocks white hatted and showed them this and they are not reacting properly.
Such a shitshow the NF has run a once promising project into the ground.

[Anonymous No.24040414]

There is no way in hell that Nano can be a global currency sub 10K TPS. Visa alone has 65K TPS and is not serving the unbanked and not meant for micro-transactions.,
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

If Nano had the minimum TPS for a global currency, 100K, the costs of running nodes (IO, CPU and bandwith) would be astronomical. Your moronic business model says that node operators shall do it all for free 24/7, all holidays etc. A few seconds without node operators doing it all for free and your whole shit network crashed. You have zero guarantee that the network is stable and usable at all times. Who the hell would invest and use such a shit network?

Plus you have crypto's worst and most inept community. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24040423]

post sexy georges

[Anonymous No.24040464]

>>24040423

[Anonymous No.24040491]

>>24040464
I must eat her red cunt while nanoid simps are watching with their dicks in chastity

[Anonymous No.24040513]

>>24040423
.

[Anonymous No.24040874]

>>24036504
You're beyond retarded.

[Anonymous No.24041038]

>>24040874
>You're beyond retarded.
Nice psychological projection there, faggot. Why do so many of you Nano findom cucks have mental problems?

The utter morons in Nano not only has feminazis, jewish grifters and Italian scammers, they even managed to hire an open satanist as their community manager (rockmes*ckmeJesus). That's a combo from hell. Literally.

Explain to me why Nano Foundation would be so retarded that they hire a nasty guy that will be offensive for the vast majority of the world's population when the idiots whine that they plan to be a global currency. Is there ANY rational explanation behind their many spastic and insane management decisions?

[Anonymous No.24041057]

>>24022368
>>24022401
>>24022562
>>24022606
>>24022835
>>24022916
>>24022966
>>24022984
>>24023294
>>24023500
>>24023704
>>24023771
>>24024195
>>24026307
>>24027186
>>24027629
>>24028184
>>24034948
>>24034997
>>24035089
>>24035191
>>24035260
>>24035368
>>24035495
>>24035571
>>24035702
>>24035767
>>24035844
>>24036281
>>24036369
>>24036504
>>24036701
>>24036922
>>24037029
>>24037191
>>24037272
>>24037406
>>24037527
>>24037694
>>24037753
>>24037839
>>24037902
>>24037960
>>24038376
>>24038414
>>24038898
>>24039016
>>24039212
>>24039406
>>24039500
>>24039552
>>24039605
>>24039777
>>24039955
>>24039983
>>24040215
>>24040295
>>24040384
>>24040414
>>24040464
>>24040513

Holy shit, its like an angry ex girlfriend who won't leave you the fuck alone. Don't stick your dick in crazy folks.

This is a lot of energy being utilized here. I might start making Nano threads on the daily just to troll this guy into an autistic rage.

[Anonymous No.24041123]

>>24041057
unironically bought 5k due to this thread and the desperation of the fud, thanks

[Anonymous No.24041143]

>>24041123
np fren, happy to bring another anon on board

[Anonymous No.24041247]

>>24041057
Please do. Don't forget to take your "girlfriends" from Nano tranny discord with you, as you only can operate in rat packs when you boomers flood /biz/. I'm sure potential investors will be immensely impressed by you unhinged Nanoid psychos. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.24041294]

>>24041123
>>24041143
>unironically bought 5k due to this thread and the desperation of the fud, thanks
Only 5k, normally you Nanoid psychos lied about buying 100K and 500K, pic: >>24037406

[Anonymous No.24041337]

>>24041294
No one is dumb enough to think that comment is real. It is obviously you. You aren't fooling anyone, rofl.

[Anonymous No.24041373]

>>24041337
But for the record I am close to having a 100k stack, so suck my dick faggot :)

[Anonymous No.24041476]

>>24041337
Take a good look at the insane comments from you Nanoids in this very thread. Or maybe you are so mentally handicapped yourself that you are unable to detect mental insanity and people writing while doing hard drugs (to cope with Nano's vile market crash).

>>24041373
>But for the record I am close to having a 100k stack, so suck my dick faggot :)
Yes, you are that old burned out Satanist psychos that hang around Nano threads. Again, are you the idiot rockmesuck blah blah, or not. It can't be that many psycho satanists running around in Nano community, right? Don't just run away, coward.

[Anonymous No.24041540]

>>24041373
>But for the record I am close to having a 100k stack,
You DO understand that for anyone outside /r/NanoCircleJerk having 100K Nano is the hallmark of a highly disturbed individual or just plain loser? Who the hell would brag about something like that?

[Anonymous No.24041582]

>>24041540
Because I want you to cope hard faggot when I am driving my Tesla :)

>>24041476
I am anonymous, and I do not forgive, and I do not forget.

[Anonymous No.24041659]

>>24041582
>I do not forgive, and I do not forget.
I couldn't care less. Literally. Take your satan alter and stuff it up your ass. Rough anal sex so you bleed is part of your "worship" so you are used to that, right homo? That and urine drinking.

[Anonymous No.24041768]

>>24041659
We are legion, for we are many. Do not forget that.

[Anonymous No.24041895]

>>24041768
>We are legion, for we are many. Do not forget that.
You are a loser, just like your master satan. You are a weak and spineless hedonist. A traitor to human mankind. Low IQ and low self-discipline. When did you satanists ever created a society? Why do you deranged satanists always live as parasites on other societies and civilizations?

[Anonymous No.24041901]

good thing that hes revealing the shit behind this reddit tier shitscam.

[Anonymous No.24042025]

True, and still the Nano plebbitors can't understand why their scam and shitcoin is crashing hard, never to recover.

[Anonymous No.24042196]

This thread

[Anonymous No.24042237]

>>24042196
Back to plebbit. You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.24042340]

>>24042237
REEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.24042458]

>tfw your crypto has zero inflation and the most solid tech in the space

[Anonymous No.24042526]

The jews fear Reichblocks.

[Anonymous No.24042542]

>>24041540
>>24041476
>>24041895
>>24041659
Holy shit the schizo is real

[Anonymous No.24042936]

>>24042542
70 posts by this ID