3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
I'll answer any questions you may have about the most important project in crypto here, meme free.
wen orrigles
>>23027000>I'll answer any questions you may have about the most important project in crypto here, meme free.why do you suck cock for a living, faggot?
>>23027000How far is deco away to be implemented and does it need the token?
>>23027012Mainnet has been live for over a year now>>23027013Your mother's excellent tutelage
>>23027000>the most important project in cryptoHow is this more important than ethereum?
>>23027000checked. 1st need to know how big is your stack ?
>>23027029Deco and arbitrum will be the first staking required node functions. I would guess that arbitrum will be launched first. Ed seems pretty enthusiastic that the first iteration (rollup only) will be live by EOY, so Q1/2 2021 for deco. Both require a value asset to ensure proper behavior of nodes. That asset is link.
>>23027041As L2 solutions become more widely used and as cross chain wraps and unwraps become native, the execution layer becomes a race to zero in terms of per operation execution costs.Eth was the most important part of crypto before link integrated arbitrum.>>230270486 figs link, 4 figs eth, some btc/xmr and a bunch of shitcoins
1) Can it actually be decentralised. Nodes perhaps but Sergey is so integral in setting up the networks that I don't believe you can take Chainlink as an enterprise out of the equation and expect it to run smoothly with a meme DAO.2) Why does Sergey continue to dodge questions about whether the token is needed. Can't you just run the network on ETH and have nodes which provide data inputs paid in ETH, like PNK does?If LINK has to be used because Chainlink says so, how is it decentralised? Surely forking it and making the same system with ETH rewards would provide enough incentive for individual nodes to migrate to the fork.I don't like how sergey completely brushed off this question in the interview in August and it's been bugging me a lot. Vitalik almost pissed himself trying to not laugh when sergey avoided answering.
>>23027000Does link tokens staked to nodes remove them from circulation? Does this mean that the market supply drops? Will this effect price?
>>23027000>about the most important project in cryptohahahahahahahahahahaha ok
>>23027059Sounds good. And to expand on this, are there any plans to work together with institutions, or are there any third parties working with institutions setting up nodes, to provide secure secured personal data, like if a person is on a terror watch list, a criminal on a money laundering watch list and so forth, that would make the product an option for decentralized kyc and aml compliance for decentralized exchanges?
>>230271061. The network is currently "decentralized" in that anyone can spin up a link node. People currently have their names associated with nodes to provide a layer of sybil resistance and because currently the passive income functions of the nodes (VRF, arbitrum, deco, reserve checking etc.) are small compared to the data delivery aspects of the nodes. For that reason the nodes have to be subsidized by the node incentive fund (which, to their credit, the team anticipated from the very beginning).2. If you can't figure out how the token is needed, then you haven't been keeping up. Link was made as a custom erc677 for transferandcall functionality and was specifically made for eth by Ellis. You can't pay link nodes for data, contracts execution etc. in any other format (on the back end, on the front end it is easy to make fiat or other crypto auto exchange for link so that the users don't have to know they hold/buy link)
1. why won't flare/coinbase oracle/band/a government oracle solution/an oracle solution created by microsoft, google, etc overtake it?2. wen moon3. how low do you estimate we are going4. how long until widespread adoption?5. can this technology seriously become a significant part of the fourth industrial revolution? is this technology really as gamechanging as people say it is? can this really make half of businesses obsolete?6. why is it valued so highly? can't you just use a different crypto as contract collateral?
steaking this year?
>>23027122They are temporarily out of circulation, but not burned. This effectively reduces supply as the number of nodes increases. Also functioning by the same mechanisms:link used as collateral for defi applicationslink locked on eth l1 to be used in other chain's applications of link (polkadot, cosmos, irisnet etc.)Re price you can conclude what you'd like>>23027147If you watch the CanDID videos from Ari's group they explicitly go over this use caseIn short if an exchange using CanDID (or any of its whitelabels like MSFTs decentralized ID...) wants to, they can apply whitelists/blacklists as they please
Can it be used with Monero for example? Meaning right now.
>>23027169>If you can't figure out how the token is needed, then you haven't been keeping up. Link was made as a custom erc677 for transferandcall functionality and was specifically made for eth by Ellis.I read the whitepaper and sold at $14. But you have also not answered my question. You say that you can't pay link nodes in anything other than link, but I would say it can by one by using a different oracle network which attracts nodes and pays them in another token without the middleman of link, and thus reduces the cost to the end user, which drives data requests to the fork or new project, which incentivises the decentralised nodes to also run a non-link node to get a slice of that pie too, and suddenly LINK (the token, not the tech) becomes irrelevant.
https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/934
I have the same concern as this anon >>23027251I think the Chainlink tech is valuable but I do not know if the Chainlink token is needed or not.If the token is needed then why?Please answer anon >>23027000Nice trips btw
>>230271931. If they had a complete oracle network available, they might. But they don't and they're whitelabeling link2. No idea3. No idea4. Likely starts once all of deco, arbitrum, candid and staking are out5. Are you aware of how much money is spent annually on white collar work like records reconciliation, contracts work and manual value transfer?6. See the above posts. People having concerns about link using another token are as smart as people who think microsoft has no value because someone could just create another OS>>23027194Hopefully, I'd say better than 50/50 for first iteration (slashing for only non-response) of staking>>23027242Not at current, but you could easily run a node service that would pay out in monero or receive payment in monero and reap rewards on the margin>>23027300Again, link is the required payment form. See above analogy about windows
Anon but could I do this for example.Recieve payment in Monero wallet Once payment recieved send another coin in another chain (ETH for example) to another address?
i have 11,500~ linkdo i need more?
>>23027251Finally somebody in this god forsaken place who isn't a fucking sheep and can think for themselves.
>>23027000What the fuck happened to Oracle integration
What is the main method they will use to keep chainlink Sybil resistant?In the whitepaper it is TEE but that seems like a useless meme at this point, since the INTEL SGX got hacked and honestly having to check the hardware of nodes with certificates has never seemed ideal, that's just another form of KYCSo reputation system? We all know how easily those are fucked (see Amazon ratings)Or something else? Can Deco solve the Sybil problem?
>>23027059I thought deco was already on mainnet
>>23027430Yes, as long as the link node or nodes had read access to the transactions of the receiving xmr wallet (which can be done through the wallet)>>23027440depends on your risk toleranceif that is less than 1% of your total net worth, then yesif that is more than 50%, no
>>23027373Alright anon, my biggest concern is this: What will be the source of the demand that will ultimately serve to drive up the market price of the Link token?For example, ETH is used for money transfer, for dexes, for DeFi and Uniswap scam projects.What will be the reason for increased Chainlink token demand?As I understand currently, it can only be used to pay node operators right?
>>23027251>a different oracle networklink will be the most salient oracle solution looking. first mover advantage. the other projects will wither, and link will continue to balloon out of control with trust, deveopment tools, etc
>>23027373Ah, I see. You need to pay in LINK because... we say so. Looks like selling was a good option. Thanks anon.
I'll read this thread later in its entirety so skip my questions if asked already. 1. Why did the website change to remove swift etc2. Is arbitrum all sizzle and no steak? Or will they be able to meet deadlines with a working product? 3. What does the team think of defi and the proliferation of rug pulls?4. Is chainlink gonna be involved in l2 for uniswap?
>>23027486I'd guess that everyone thought the two things needed for enterprise volumes (arbitrum/deco and threshold signatures) would be live by now. Probably won't go live until then.>>23027518Having transparent people running nodes is the simplest way (so you know the same people aren't running all the nodes doing your job)From there opening the network once passive income makes sense from nodesTEE and deco have nothing to do with sybil resistance, they are for one way data/computation confidentiality>>23027519Don't believe so. And even if it was it needs scaling to be viable.
>>23027531Thank you anon you are great!
>>23027169Yeah but someone made a medium article where they had made a sort of wrapped ETH erc677 token, which could perfectly be used.I think the real answer is that the reliable nodes are all in the Chainlink network rn and will not switch to some arbitrary new one (why would they), and building up a new network would be very difficult, exactly because of Sybil concerns.The fact is that the CL network is a sort of singularity, if you start out with a majority of honest nodes through KYC and build it up to be more decentralized as the crypto space grows, that is unironically the only way to kickstart a functioning reputation system, meaning CL will be the only one to pull it off.
I unironically need chainlink to go to $1000. Will this happen in the next 10 years?
>>23027000Hypothetically, why would two corporations insure a data process through a centralized third party system of insuring a cryptocurrency (the most volatile asset ever conceived), when data processes can be written simply with code, and encrypted over the network just fine?
>>23027000Important question:What's the link to the videos where pepe plush gets saved by Sergey Nazarov? I can't find it.
>>23027535Let's list every thing that link does that generates demand for link:- Provides data on which to trigger smart contracts- Provides payment/cross chain outputs for smart contracts- Provides API outputs for smart contracts- Provides proof of decentralized ID through CanDID- Provides smart contract execution through arbitrum- Provides SC privacy and obfuscation through SGX and deco- Provides verifiable randomness through VRF- Provides cross chain communication for a fee- Provides staking asset for node participationMost/all smart contracts use one or more of the aboveAny time anybody does any of the above, the value of the link network growsThe value of the link network is held in the link token>>23027544This is weak bait. You use the link token because you can't access the network otherwise. If you can't access the network you can't compete against your peers who can.>>230275451. Re: swift logos no idea. They still mention that they work with swift in their marketing materials.2. To be fair they haven't missed a date yet and are saying Q4 arbitrum and Q1 AnyTrust. We'll see if they deliver.3. Defi good as it lets everyone have access. Rugpulls less so.4. Since optimism appears to not be able to run uniswap's code, I would guess that uniswap will need arbitrum.
>>23027590>From there opening the network once passive income makes sense from nodesthis is harder than you think.The main problem with staking is a sort of attack where a majority of dishonest nodes can work together with a dishonest customer to request oracle data from an honest node and defraud them out of their stake.It will all depend on how the validity of a staking claim is checked, which you could do by activating the whole network to decide if a staking claim is made but then again you would need the majority of the network to be honest.An alternative is having the majority of KYC'd nodes check the staking claim if a claim is made.
>>23027669I thought Chainlink was intended to allow the blockchain to access offchain data, why would companies outside of the blockchain use it for data transfer?
>>23027609Link's network takes link's erc677, not any erc677>>23027666Yes>>23027669Because chainlink ensures data providers are paid and accountable with a 100% uptime decentralized network. What you mentioned has been tried and failed umpteenth times.>>23027675No
>itt, people still clinging to an asset that dropped 50% after a disastrous conference
What are your thoughts on optimism?
>>23027697>This is weak bait. You use the link token because you can't access the network otherwise. If you can't access the network you can't compete against your peers who can.I'm not baiting. I really have seen nobody answer this question on /biz/ and I really did sell all my LINK when I saw sergey dodge this exact question on stream. If I had a decentralised oracle network that did not pay in LINK, I would have a cheaper product. The reduced price to pull data would make more people pull that data. More people pulling that data would attract nodes looking to get a cut of those requests. Many nodes would then provide data to [hypothetical fork network] and Chainlink simultaneously, but one would be cheaper to run. Why will LINK be worth money in this scenario.
>>23027000What will be some big milestones for Chainlink before eoy?
>>23027722If you noticed how arbitrum was developed it needs only one trustworthy nodeFor nodes running only passive income functions expect similar construction and a core of high rep KYC'd nodes, at least initially>>23027725They need the trust assurances of smartcontractsThey won't know they're using blockchain, they'll just know they need to use them otherwise they go out of business>>23027741Most of us bought sub $1Cope more>>23027799Again, weak baitYour question has been answered and now you're just being an idiot
>>23027899>Again, weak bait>Your question has been answered and now you're just being an idiotThe state of shills
>>230278431. Tsigs (and resulting cut in node funding rates from the node fund)2. Staking3. Arbitrum v1
>>23027799because node operators want to be paid in LINK, not some worthless chink clone that's fractions of a penny>hey guys, I've figured out a way to make a VERY SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY, hear me out
>>23027697Thanks anon. One last thing is Sergey concerned about finance laws and regs? Being involved in Layer 2 means you might be targeted by sec prosecutors
>>23027899you are a fucking moron. no legitimate business will trust the fat fuck with their company data or actually pay into the ecosystem. cope harder with your scam that can't even hold $10
>>23027697>The value of the link network is held in the link tokenAlright so we looped right back to my original concern. This is the part I am not so sure about. Do you really need the link token to access the link network? I don't understand why the token would be necessary for that.For the time being, I am inclined to believe that the value of the Link token reflects the value of the Link tech but I am not 100% sure.
>>23027899I'm not baiting. Your answer, "If you can't figure out how the token is needed, then you haven't been keeping up." is literally >he doesn't know, but with more words. You haven't answered anything.
>>23027955the question was answered 12 times in this thread. In the background link is needed. At the front end, no
>>23027799Competitors/forks don't have: deco, Tsigs, Arbitrum, town crier & trusted node operators who are making money pretty well and won't want to risk their livelihood moving to a chink scam. The industry standard.
What's the reason for the Sergey dumps every week?
>>23027942Link has in house counsel and the backing of every legacy finance partner. They run the thing exactly not like a normal ICO. They're fine with reg.>>23027951Again, the whole point of the network is that they can use smartcontracts without revealing their data.Try to keep up.>>23027953You can't request data without paying linkYou can't stake a node without linkIt is literally coded that wayNot sure how you're missing this>>23027955See above
>>23027729>Because chainlink ensures data providers are paid and accountable with a 100% uptime decentralized network. What you mentioned has been tried and failed umpteenth times.This isn't a problem in the first place. Code doesn't care about trustlessness (it doesn't need it), it simple executes instructions based on inputs.You don't understand the larger point here.>It's been tried umpteenth timesIf it can't be written with code and implemented, it's not going to be written with code, AND THEN insured with a cryptocurrency.Think about how a betting website operates, countless data processes that must be 100% accurate and secure (if not, you risk potentially limitless loss). No problem.
>>23028005To give himself a massive cash runway so that no matter what happens link can:continue to be developed for the next two years, which is more than enough to put out a true v1buy up every super high quality person who comes across their desk>>23028020You just proved my point: betting done on smartcontract network doesn't have to trust anyonebetting done on betting site -> site goes under or host exit scams: you're fucked
>>23028018my sides, you think legacy finance is involved with chainlink. none of that showed up to smartcon
>>23028055Thank you sensei!
>>23027899>>23028018Oh I see.Alright then. Thanks anon!
>>23027000>try to keep sentiment up>project 50% down alreadyLMFAO, keep bagholding why you cope losing 50% of your networth in 2 months, and to be exact 1 month.Price target 1,5$-4,5$.Keep hosting those threads
>>23028018>You can't request data without paying link>You can't stake a node without link>It is literally coded that way>Not sure how you're missing thisHardcoded inefficiency.
>>23028018This goes beyond ico concerns. The sec has already slapped huge fines and desist orders on people who developed dexes. If link is involved in the layer 2 of a DeX the sec is gonna come after them due to money laundering concerns
>>23028020Betting websites do have problems. They just rely on their tech people to catch the mistakes and fix em right away. Smart contracts cannot afford the same luxury, so chainlink is required.
>>23028018That reminds me.How is their manhunt for a legal counsel going? The company is getting to the point where this is a crucial point and failing to recruit, with tech nerds and philosophers calling the shoots a recipe for disaster, judging by attacking the uniswappers with some speculation on regulations.
>>23028096wrong, it's not inefficiency it's a necessity since whatever you're staking needs to have value.Using something else for staking would create a dependency on something external and thus an extra attack vector to the CL network.
Ok, but for all my dreams to really come true, I need link to go to $2500 usd... can this happen in the next 10 years?
>>23027951They trust the network and DECO
>>23028211Bro it's $80k+ 2026 JUST TRUST ME BRONow have you bought more, yet?
>>23028211in the next 10 years maybe but the easier way is to buy more now.If you are really betting on that future than at least bet properly.
>>23028072Chainlink already has banks selling their forex data and is integrated with china's bsn>>23028076>>23028081Happy to help>>23028093If you think this is the case please open a short and post it>>23028096If this inefficency was not coded there would not be a proper economic incentive to do all the things link does>>23028100Again, link is a platformLink will not run their own dexIf someone hosts an illegal website, they don't sue the internet
>>23027999>Competitors/forks don't have: deco, Tsigs, Arbitrum, town crierneither does link. lmao. Vaporware doesn't mean shit retard.
>>23028072Bro smartcon is conference for DeFi blockchain tech. Why would a legacy finace join it rather than SIBOS?
>>23028055>You just proved my point: betting done on smartcontract network doesn't have to trust anyone>betting done on betting site -> site goes under or host exit scams: you're fuckedThe betting website gets the data for free. They don't even think about it. Irrespective of what Chainlink is going to charge for all these processes, the website simply scoops up the data. It doesn't behoove the betting website (just like any company would be risking their existence) by manipulating their data. In this sense, a betting website has zero use case for Chainlink. The website is either legitimate, or not. A company is either legitimate, or not. An exit scam can be done with or without Chainlink.>>23028131Give me an instance.
>>23028301>proper economic incentivewhat you really mean is token needed because Smart (((con))) rent seeking. It's pretty sad you paid shills have to keep feeding total horse shit to your biggest retarded cultists.
>>23028356no, see>>23028158it's a necessity for stakingstaking is a necessity for an honest oracle network.
>>23028301>If this inefficency was not coded there would not be a proper economic incentive to do all the things link doesexcept there would. Literally anything else would be better for users and nodes.>be broker>pay 1k LINK/month in data requests when LINK is $1>LINK goes to $81,000>I can no longer afford to pay in LINKalternatively>be node operator>structure my business around receiving $81k in LINK per month and instantly market selling to reduce volatility>LINK goes to $1>my whole business is ruinedObviously this is hyperbole but the point stands. The token would be better replaced by stablecoins or wETH.
>>23027373>Hopefully, I'd say better than 50/50 for first iteration (slashing for only non-response) of stakingCan you imageboard be how complicated the web of nodes reporting on uptime and infrastructure outages for insurance for nodes reporting on data is going to get?There will be link nodes that deliver information on link nodes to other link nodes that report to other nodes ad infinitum.I gotta get back in my node game! I haven't fucked with it since mainnet
>>23028335ah yes I forgot Microsoft and oracle were apart of Defi >>23028301post proof of forex. price feeds are not being used by big finance
>>23028020>If it can't be written with code and implemented, it's not going to be written with code, AND THEN insured with a cryptocurrency.unironically smartest person itc. The problem space shitcoins like "chainlink" propose to solve are turing complete and are irrelevant since a court of law is all that is necessary for two legitimate businesses to reconcile issues with data timeliness and accuracy. Chainlink will never be cheaper or faster than two instances of SAP blasting idocs at each other and ultimately a court of law will negate whatever liquidation or trust beach (note this can't even be done due to turing completeness) that chainlink imposes.
>>23028464>Can you imageboard be complicatedLol*Imagine how complicated
>>23028453>except there would. Literally anything else would be better for users and nodes.again, see >>23028158
>>23028431>it's a necessity for stakingwhich is vaporware. so your alleged point is bullshit.
>>23028148No inside info outside that they are offering a ton of money, probably paying a hefty retainer right now>>23028211Probably>>23028311Bespoke tech solutions from the best comp sci department in the country does>>23028355Again, the betting website would love to just say who wonThe customer is the bettor in this case, who would clearly prefer a trustless solution>>23028356It would have been more decent to just admit you're wrong rather than devolve into a puddle of idiot tier fud>>23028431this
>>23027544I mean, yes. They made it that way, and now it is that way.Seethe more I guess
>>23028513They said the same about mainnet before releaseBut come fren, your FUD is just a bit too stale for me to take it seriously. Why are you still fudding your own investment anno. 2020? Everyone already knows link is legit. They just don't know how legit yet.
>>23028520>Bespoke tech solutions from the best comp sci department in the country doesdoesn't matter. making strong claims about a product that doesn't exist is literally no better than vapor.
>>23028453Try thinking about the problem using the tools link offers:denominate staking in USD with link/USD reference data (which link provides)Get it?>>23028464And secondary data derivatives to cut into the market of high quality data providers: want weather data and don't want to pay the gold standard? our derivate of XY and Z is 99.8% as accurate for low value (daily crop insurance?) applicationsReally thinking about it there will be literally billions of actions of the chainlink network every dayJust arbitrum anytrust volume will be insane>>23028473https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2020/07/24/korean-banks-chainlink/>>23028489It is less expensive up frontAnd far less expensive than any algorithm that involves legacy courts as a reconciliation system>>23028513Again, you could just admit you are wrong and say thank you to all the people who educated you hereYou know, like a good human being
>>23027741>DisastrousThat conference was so goddamned BULLISH. I'm sorry there wasn't confetti and fucking apple stickers. Maybe go with Tron for the future?
>>23028592>It is less expensive up front>And far less expensive than any algorithm that involves legacy courts as a reconciliation systemexcept any action on chainlink is not legally binding and could be voided in reconciliation in a civil court of law. You retards clearly never had working experience in these domains.
>>23028301>If you think this is the case please open a short and post itfuckin faggots like you posted those kind of threads in mid august at the peak of Oracle bubble.go suck a dick, stay cultist, and make more gulible anons lose their money. >Pic related>generational wealth>literally peak fuckin signal, posting before peak price>lost 1 500 000 USD+ from topSTAYFUCKINRETARDED
>>23028592Thoughts about arbitrum? It seems to me that just increasing the capacity of the network by a factor 10 alone would increase the value of the network to some degree with regards to the number of feeds served etc. I recall Felten saying a first solution was VERY close att the conference
>>23028601nothing was bullish about rhodes and fernando laughing like beavis and butthead for 25 minutes>>23028592network usage in theory causes price to rise. i think you see the current problem
>>23028568There is a difference between peer reviewed literature on which your solution is based and vaporwareYou do understand that, right?>>23028613Smartcontracts are as binding as "will the internet still exist"? They don't need traditional courts as they are deterministic, which is better in terms of cost, clarity and time to execution
>>23028630L O L
>>230286303 years fag
A fucking json parser .. hahahahaha
>>23028630Again, post a short or you're a coward and a hypocrite>>23028633I would guess that it will be big. Ed's team seems legit and they've said before EOY for v1, anytrust by Q1 or q2 2021We'll see if they deliver>>23028652This solution exactly addresses your point.
>>23028661thanks for this thread anon. ironic fudders are annoying but complete idiots who really dont understand certain arguments are infuriating. hope you are well
>>23028633Checked and add-a-zero pilled>>23028661This has been a great back to basics, head on straight, remeber why we fell in love in the first place, anti-struggle session anon. Thanks
>>23028661>They don't need traditional courts as they are deterministicthis is false. nothing about the design of chainlink as it is or claimed to work in the "near future (never)" does not solve the turing completeness of the problem domain. you're a child and stupid too. those academic papers make no mathematic proof of application of said features in chainlink. It's basically just a well dressed scam in semi-truths. Unlike most of the retards on /biz/ though, I paid attention in class and have various jobs in like domains. You can't scam me retard and I'm pretty sure most people are on to this shit. It parabola'd and will go to zero.
>>23028701not a future trader, unloaded everything mid August, what now you cultist fuckin faggot ?>t.2018 DCA under 50 cents
>>23028731
>>23028701From the wording, I sort of expected v1 in September. At this position in time, we could have arbitrum v1 and whitepaper v2 drop at any moment which gives me a little bit of vertigo. Not to say anything about Oracle, E&Y, BSN, Baseline and Interwork which seems ready to drop the very moment scaling is online... Just hoping the rest of the market doesn't completely shit the bed before then, given the current state of the world
all of you motherfuckers have blood on their hands, you fuckin piece of shits.>Muh smartcon>muh 30$ soon>muh parabolafuckin fundamentals =/= market price.pain is 80-90% from top, when all those 10$+ buyers will capitulatenow watch me shit on this thread in 4 posts and all of those 3 digit LINK stack holders seethe
>>23028731Then post your sell orders faggot.Screencap them. There is no need to disclose amounts, just the date will do. Come on faggot.
>>23028096tell me exactly how this is inefficient and what you would do different without it being outside of the parameters of crypto?
>>23028731Post the etherscan wallet moves and/or some sell order screenshots or you a liar with a screenshot that's been circulated since august
>>23028513>which is vaporware. so your alleged point is bullshit.I mean there are already operational nodes so you're wrong.
>>23028731Why continue to post here then? You’ve made it and you hate everyone here, why not go enjoy life? It’s definitely not cause you’re secretly wondering in the back of your mind that these cultist faggots were right, and you may have given up generational wealth to live nigger rich for a few years, nah, maybe you just have a heart of gold and want to save everyone, that must be it!
>>23027799>If I had a decentralised oracle network that did not pay in LINK, I would have a cheaper product.Then why doesn't BAND make one (kek)? or Tellor?
>>23028828>all of you motherfuckers have blood on their hands, you fuckin piece of shits.>>23028889He bought the top and he's now bagholding, that's why.
>>23028780western society was a mistake
>>23028453Do you not pay in the value of dollars in link? So you pay $1k dollars of link, not 1k of link.So today you might pay in .001 in link, or .000000000001 tomorrowNot sure your logic is correct
>>23028453>be broker>pay 1k LINK/month in data requests when LINK is $1>LINK goes to $81,000>I can no longer afford to pay in LINKTalk about dishonest! You'd be paying 0.01234567901234 LINK in that scenario, not 1,000 LINK.
>>23027920So you’re saying oracle integration around q4?
>>23028211There was an anon here with 4 million LINK (not $4 in LINK) a few weeks ago and he was dead serious about LINK reaching $5000So you will be fine
>>23028834>>23028854>>23028889>>23028910one of the last days of selling, approx 2000 LINK for 27 000 EUR , i bought these at 4000-5000 SATS aka 16 cents USD, approx 320 USD.300 dollars into 27000 EUR.>muh you stupidwhoever didnt start unloading 2017/18 bags at 10$+ is fuckin retarded cultistsi bought these useless fuckin meme tokens for pennies and made bank. >inb4 "2000LINK" stacki held 5 digit, i can post 2018 buyins that would make half of this thread salivate, but cba about logging into Binance for free.you keep screaming FUD.keeping it real. LINK and current state of crypto is basically useless vaporwave.zero fuckin real world usecases after 3 years, and a pump that useless comptetior matched in 4 months, because they marketed the shit out of BAND, they did staking etc.Now go fuckin suck it, you all probably bought at 4$ at Google announcment
>>23028708Its how they protect their egoThere is a reason all the world hates them>>23028709Chainlink is intrinsically mellowYou just win>>23028727Well if you've had various jobs in domains then you must know what you're talking aboutMore than full professors from Cornell and PrincetonAnd the legacy finance elite>>23028731Again, put your money where your mouth is or you're a liar>>23028819That's the pain and joy of chainlinkNo leaks, just working solutions when they're done>>23028828Post short or nobody cares>>23028910Either that or he's watched link destroy his qnt and rlc bags and all he has left is his feelings>>23028961He's intentionally ignoring this point because he wants to feel right>>23028989This
>>23029053Why type like reddit when you can just be retarded?
>>23028854yeah and one more thing im the guy who wrote this, who created couple of threads that you guys should get the fuck out on top.nobody listened then, nobody will listen now.see you in couple of weeks, because for sure everyone will come buying crypto with their unemployment checks, flu season coming, civil war is coming, and basically all world is turning into orwell's book.everybody will cause 2017 level of bullrun.meanwhile biggest bull shill on the crypto twitter went MIA on August 26, and lost 1 000 000 on Binance futures (@satoshiflipper)bull run is cancelled.winter is coming
>>23028996Best case scenarioI'd say more likely q1/2 2021>>230290115000 is definitely ambitiousBut if link actually becomes the internet of value it's fud>>23029053You are bragging about 2k link?You have to be jokingEveryone here from the sub 40c days have 6 figure stacksFor reference I sell nearly that amount every month as part of my deleveraging strategyYou're pathetic
>>23029082imma type however i want, with reddit spacing, samefagging and doing whatever i want.i dont obey rules made on /b/ by cheetofinger amerifags losers to type in one fuckin row.you probably dont even know who boxy was so stfu newfag
>>23028473They were there
>>23029133Everyone knows who Caitlin was child, you can go now.
>>23029110>thinking proclaiming a bear market scares linkieswe did a 5x in a bear run. for an oldfag, you sure are a huge newfag.
>>23029115i literally stated in that post that i held 5 digits, and i was unloading for couple of days you fuckin absolute faggot, i inb4 your ass and you dont even know what that means probably.good that you stated you hold 6 figure stack and still holding. now post your fuckin wallet, so i can laugh about how much of your money you already lost.then i will laugh again reposting that shit in matter of weeks.not because i hate LINK, its because i hate fuckin faggots like you and 160K who basically robbed 4digit or low 5digit LINK holders out of life changing money.you are the fuckin cancer of this board, go fuck yourself.most of those anons will sell another -50% move down because they will go full panic mode and this is all your doing.hell, people even posted here selling of it at 10-11$, because they realized its all fuckin smoke and mirrors.go fuck yourself you fuckin pajeet
>>23029200I get it now, you’re jealous that link can crash 60% and you still have nowhere near the money others have. Sad.
fuck whoever is preaching to marry a project, and fuck whoever is telling you not to take profitsdisgusting pieces of fuckin shits
>>23029226yes yes out of jealousy i bought link at 4000-6000 sats and started unloading it at 100 000 sats.out of spite, and insert more useless fuckin you's.praying for whoever bought those bags, probably real salty atm
>>23029053You can't be serious. You made 27k profit off Link and you are calling us stupid? Do you realize most people from 2017 own at least 40-50k Link?
>>23029053>I-I swear I have more on Binance!
>>23029341YES YES SIR I ONLY BOUGHT 300$ WORTH OF LINK IN 2018 HEHEHEHEHESIR KEEP HOLDING SIR, ONCE WE BREAK 10$ , 30$ IS IN REACH, NO STOP LOSS
>>23027000I've always kind of wondered this, but what does Town Crier actually do and how it benefits LINK?
>>23029385just a casual 6K LINK at 2800 Sats for ya. i would dig more but not even wasting clicks for free anymore.yall niggas poor and deluded anyways so you will come up with another excuse about why you holding -50% move down, because you greedy fucks weren't satisfied with X100KISSES :*another deluded thread derailed
>>23029392Making pajeet references while showing off your 27k profit on kraken, you sure showed us.
>>23029364>Imaging thinking time travel is possible in a linear universe
>>23029271Question, you seem to be someone who understands the market and invests solely based on that over fundamentals. This leads me to wonder, what pulled you towards link? There were far more lucrative opportunities in the crypto space over the course of the last 3 years if you were looking at it only as a tool to generate wealth. Also, why hold link through the mainnet and google/coinbase pumps? What was different then that has changed now? I heard you mentioned corona, but we just saw link top its previous ath as well as gain tremendously in sats since the March dump, even after the recent pullback in price. If you can adequately answer these questions I will consider abandoning the project.
>>23027000>stop fussing chainlink 1000 eoy!>alright guys seriously by my ba- I mean this coins I’ll keep making these threads but please by chain link
>>23027000How much is LINK going to EOY 2020, 2021, 2023 and 2025?
Good job OP, a beat is always fun and useful to see what is hiding in the forest
>>23029512$7$5$1$0.05$0.01
should i buy some more?
token not needed
>>23029451it's starting to look like you actually sold before the pump and are trying to hide it
>>23029512this is the important question.
>>23029464BTC rejected at 12 000 range, defi/oracle/farming scam bubble.i threw some money at LINK because it was a project solving the real issue in blockchain, with possible real world usage.since crypto is useless fuckin vaporwave scam atm, and without regulations it can't survive, i doubt this gambling casino for chinks and scammers will survive another -50-70% move without serious goverments (check Bitmex situation) doing work on it.basically yall chinks and pajeets can scam whites and kikes for so long until you hear helicopters outside.next step capitulation, regulations etc.and i didnt held mainnet pumpalso i know this is a bait, because im not a newfag you fuckin piece of shit , but im responding to whoever wants to read a voice of reason on this fuckin cultist infested board.also set my price target at 10$ minimum to start unloading and decided to unload 100% based on what was presented in August.crypto is a scam, zero real world usage, LINK has zero fuckin usecases other than feeding ETH price to useless fuckin contracts after 3 years, and zero real world partnerships that's avaible to public.everything is priced in, oracle was basically milking the shit out of it's "Startup program".>inb4 this thati dont fuckin care, show me AXA,SWIFT,MAERSK,Microsoft, AWS Amazon.nada ? then fuck you, my money is out.also zero fundamentals kept LINK from going >1,5$ in 2019 dump>1,5$ in 2020 rona dump>-60% from top 2020so 1,5$ real floor, see ya there, maybe 4$ if you guys lucky.sea of pink wojaks on catalog for a week straight, thats the bottom signal newfags.im out, going to drink some coffee and read a book.nice playing with yall
>>23027919>The state of shillsErm, reads more like you got owned, anon
>>23029662Literally avoided the question multiple times>"you got owned anon!"
>>23029615>since crypto is useless fuckin vaporwave scam atm, and without regulations it can't survive, i doubt this gambling casino for chinks and scammers will survive another -50-70% move without serious goverments (check Bitmex situation) doing work on it.Why has your perspective changed to this now?>and i didnt held mainnet pumpHow did you only end up with a 5 figure stack then? You could have purchased a 5 figure stack for a couple thousand dollars, sold mainnet pump, and bought back in to a 6 figure stack relatively easy. Would have made you millions. >crypto is a scam, zero real world usage, LINK has zero fuckin usecases other than feeding ETH price to useless fuckin contracts after 3 years, and zero real world partnerships that's avaible to public.Again why do you feel this way now but didn't for 3 years prior? What specifically shifted your opinion? You seem to understand relatively little about the space beyond the money you can make from it, which again, if that was your main concern, you did a poor job holding link rather than the various other 10x's that sprung up around it. I'm trying to be genuine but you aren't actually offering any sensible responses, you just seem angry and bitter.
>>23029615https://www.linkedin.com/in/yorkerhodeshttps://widgets.weforum.org/techpioneers-2020/chainlink/Time to buy back then I guess, lol.>inb4 EVERYTHING IS A SCAM
>>23029615>crypto is a scam, zero real world usage
>>23027300erc-677 transferandcall
>>23029727typical fuckin low IQ nigger bait, if i would swung what i bought in 2018 multiple times perfectly i would have millions of LINK not six fig you projecting faggot. i was never risking 100% of the stack for moves you dumb shit.typical attacking ad persona when arguments presented by me are literally non refutable in multiple posts>crypto situation>market situation>defi>farming scamsall of those got skipped, you greentexted shit out of context of my whole tyrade here, and you are trying to act genuine.seriously im responding only, because my new mechanical keyboard is suck a fuckin beautiful piece to type on(thanks serg), other than that- you are not on my level.suck my dick. >>23029760old shit, also keep in mind that im responsible for creating more OC and threads in 2018 that all of you salivated on, and probably know everything i have to know about the project.been probably on 90% of streams,whitepapers, deco,tsigs,mixicles.markets=/= fundamentals>>23029765its actually true, but for you the fuckin BTC machine or some shitty payment is usage.i guess you can count buying drugs with monero a real world usage.99.9% of population have zero fuckin clue what crypto does, and what it should be doing, what is sma256 for starters, and what the fuck is confidentiality problem in smartcontracts from deco whitepapercrypto is a both financial and information bubble.step outside, talk to real people.no fuckin clue and interest in sight.especially financially in current global situation.stay deluded, and next time you want my posts it's 50$ in crypto, shoot me a email>assblasterwasalarper
>>23029463What about this universe seems linear to you?
>>23029615>so 1,5$ real floor, see ya there, maybe 4$ if you guys lucky.>sea of pink wojaks on catalog for a week straight, thats the bottom signal newfags.This is a possibility anon.But what if Link is the new ETH and goes up to $100 range. What then?I think that is a strong possibility.
>>23029945>sha256 >inb4 faggotsnew keyboard, missing shit consta
>>23029945>next time you want my posts it's 50$ in crypto, shoot me a emailI dont think about you at all
>>23029945>step outside, talk to real people.>no fuckin clue and interest in sight.Bro if the average joe knew about crypto, do you honestly believe we would be able to buy BTC, ETH and Link at the current prices?No. Everybody would want a piece of that pie, the insane demand would send the price of these assets shooting through the roof. That's what I am betting on. Crypto will surely become mainstream at some point in the future. It just needs time to grow and establish itself.
>>23029945>old shitAre you serious?https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bsn-integrates-chainlink-oracles-bringing-real-world-data-into-its-irita-powered-network-301081572.htmlhttps://decrypt.co/36317/deutsche-telekom-subsidiary-operate-chainlink-nodehttps://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-brings-fx-rates-data-from-top-korean-banks-to-defiAre these scams, too old, or perhaps they indicate zero interest?
>>23027106>forking Chainlink Utter smoothbrain. Don’t you realize that the network of node operators is what makes Chainlink valuable? Can’t fork that now can you.
>>23029706>If I had a decentralised oracle network that did not pay in LINK, I would have a cheaper product. The reduced price to pull data would make more people pull that data.That's a big fucking IF, anon. That's like saying "If i had a massive infrastructure of warehouses and employed thousands upon thousands of people, had a massive first to market advantage and everybody decided to start using me, I could easily compete with Amazon"'Owned' was too weak a word, you already made a fool of yourself with your 'unanswered' question
>>23027531>tfw link is 96% if my net worth
>>23029053Brah I sold more than you in august. Sold 3k link from 17-19 usd. You a filthy linklet
>>23029999check, you should've, and you should've read. always check both sides, but currently on this board you can't play devil's advocate because it's literally pointless to talk to a herd of sheeps. arguments, sell orders, everything skipped, only low tier negro baits and "muh only 2K link" , "muh 30 000 from 300$ only showed"fuckin 2800 sats buyins turned into 6 figure sats skipped like all of you faggots do.keep holding, keep visiting only bull threads.>>23029986there's no new ETH because LINK isn't a platform for ICO scams and its not 2017. its 2020 Rona wake the fuck up.average Joe is probably unemployed or struggling, or have family member struggling, scared because of catching rona since its fed in news 24/7 on top of Trump catching it.if you really think we are in the same situation worldwide as we were in 2017 you are fuckin deluded.portnoy was literally full peak media attention and niggers i capped and posted here were the Euphoria 101 examples of how not to manage your money.if you did bet in 2017/18 on it, you won in August, you just have to walk from the table, get some drinks and wait for next opportunity to buy-in, but not with 100% of your won money.if you stay at the table with 100% betting all-in, after 100X, you are just degenerate gambler.real talk, no FUD.
crowdsale right KETJust a few hours left to get in on the groundfloor of an open-source, innovative, decentralized prediction market.BUY https://bounce.finance/join/swap/3317
>>23030066dude its old news we are actually in October and you post some shit about yorke, T-mobile and other shit, and FX rates from Korea.project working as intended, useless fuckin contracts. there's levels to real world usage and you bet your fuckin ass SWIFT vs those shit news are not even in same galactic of confirmation.>>23030165literally fuckin non-english speaking retard who didnt read posts and can't even comprehend data from screencaps.this is the nubiz level
>>23027799Anon, you don’t still think that each time someone queries the Chainlink network, they have to pay 1.00000 Chainlink token, right? You do realize that the fee per query will be something like $0.10, and depending on the price of link that may be 10 link or .000001 link. It’s the same cost for the data requestor. You do understand that, right?
coffee finished, fuck yall niggas, im out for real.No more you's, no more free education boys.
>>23030242Etherscan to your wallet then
1. $KET has a vision. The vision of this DeFi is to provide pools are designed to incentivize farming by providing liquidity for KET itself, rather than creating a low risk way for whales to dump on smaller holders to increase their holdings. ... way undervalued as per tokenomics and team is awesome, so no rug pull..Yuuuuge rewards will announcedVery nice actual gem to accumulate and get potential whale status in something with $1m+ potential once it gets wider notice.Unlikely to fall from here, as will have the great working team as machine behind it (which is growing)Medium : https://medium.com/@ketaminefinance/what-is-ketamine-finance-ket-token-ce51df2c5b4e30 ETH raised. Presale is live at bouncehttps://bounce.finance/join/swap/3317Or visit website : https://ketamine.financeHappy investing
>>23030167>there's no new ETH because LINK isn't a platform for ICO scams and its not 2017. its 2020 Rona wake the fuck up.>average Joe is probably unemployed or struggling, or have family member struggling, scared because of catching rona since its fed in news 24/7 on top of Trump catching it.>if you really think we are in the same situation worldwide as we were in 2017 you are fuckin deluded.Yeah that's what I thought too but my experience proved otherwise to me. I thought for sure that the stock and crypto markets both would contract sharply because of the Corona but that was simply not the case. All the money printed by the fed and all the free money distributed by the government were fed into these markets and kept them afloat. Seems to me, people are forced to stay home a lot more because of the Corona and that encourages these people to spend more on speculative investments like stocks and crypto.The proliferation of Robinhood also helped imo. I honestly don't agree with you anon.
>>23027139Brainlet detected
>>23029110Whats website in yourbpivmc
>>23030351Pic* sorry no idea about that typo
I highly doubt that oldfags all got 100k plus linkstacks. Even 10k stacks are rare these days. Check walletnumbers
>>23030242It's literally been like 2 months nigger what the fuck do you want, daily updates or perhaps hourly updates of what the project is doing?>BSN is nothing>no microsoft lol who the fuck is yorke>T-mobile being a node operator sure confirms the notion there is ZERO INTEREST>korean banks lol who cares every crypto project has them in it's pockets>inb4 all of crypto is a scamHave you heard about the Great Economic Reset btw?
>>23029115ah yeah one more thing, OP where is your screenshot of 100 000 + LINK wallet ? you went MIA for an hour and i was about to go read a book, and want to finish this one first you fuckin larper sentiment pushing discord tranny piece of shit>>23030284never had one wallet, also i posted like 8Kish buy-ins in caps, so suck my dick and read some posts before responding to me you fuckin newfag.>>23030301Agree to disagree
>>23028453You pay the fiat amount in LINK..
>>23030351its some graphic anons made, its actually pure comedy gold since its both funny and halftrue>>23030400have you heard about delusion, oistrich effect and normalcy bias ?because from what im seeing, yall niggas looking at vulcan erupting for 2 months and yall niggas holding ground instead of running for your lives.basically half of your body is covered with vulcanic ash, you still say everything will be alright
why would a guy like Ari bend the knee and go work for Sergey?
>>23030500$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>>23030497Let's try again now shall we?
>>23030444Sounds like linklet lies to me
>>23029110>>23030497Anon why do you think Link will fall?The worst of Corona seems to be over right?I am still accumulating at $10. I hope I am not making a huge mistake.
>>23030572It won’t fail. Look at the pipeline, it’s like a bluechip crypto now. Everybody say different is a total retard or fudding or bought the top. 10$ is stealing and we’re early as fuck
>>23029945You answered none of my questions adequately though, just deflected and sputtered out nigger nigger nigger like the autists you claim to actually despise. I asked why the crypto situation was considered worse now than 3 years ago and you couldn't formulate a response. This is boring, you're low IQ and bring nothing to this board, go back.
>>23027000What coins do you buy OP?
So, let me get this straight.The network of ChainLink can fulfill its purpose regardless of price.Why would anyone besides people hosting nodes wish upon price increase?
Why does it keep dumping?
>>23030610>It won’t fail. Look at the pipeline, it’s like a bluechip crypto now. Everybody say different is a total retard or fudding or bought the top. 10$ is stealing and we’re early as fuck>3 years>eArLyLook, i'm not going to prove it to you, but here is how it is. i bought 100k LINK 3 years ago, and it cost me $17k. Its now worth give/take $1 mil. this is not early. this is mid. in the next few years, it at best has a 5x left in it. $50 LINK is not crazy, but this is not early at all.
>>23027000Biden or Trump? Your answer to this question will determine just how intelligent you really are, and whether or not I'll choose to listen to what you have to say about $LINK
all you guys worried about upcoming XRP/flare smart contract platform? american huge technology company could eat russian hobbyist startups market share fast.
if Chainlink is that valuable, why would CZ even put Link on Binance and sell his supply?
>>23030653We will see 50$ next year. Probably 100$ plus 2022. Thats still x10 from now. What do people expect. For me mid. is 100$ plus, pushing this thing in 1000$ direction
>>23030675Their smart contract patent directly references LINK tech. They're using LINK too, they just don't want cRipples to know about it.
is there any news on arbitrum? I thought it was slated for Q4 2020, but the team is quiet
>>23030698i think we will peak around $65.
>>23030610That's what I believe too but posts like that other anon leads me to doubt sometimes.>>23030653Anon I would be happy if it reaches $20 again. I don't know about you but x2 is not too shabby at all.If you bought in to ETH at $10 or even $100, would you say you are late and it's not worth buying?>>23030698>We will see 50$ next year. Probably 100$ plus 2022. Thats still x10 from now. What do people expect.Sounds good to me. I hope we make it anon.
>>23030686He’s making tons of money trading in the short term. Duh
>>23030400>>23030548>korean banks lol who cares every crypto project has them in it's pocketsreread technicals about this implementation>>T-mobile being a node operator sure confirms the notion there is ZERO INTERESTits not THE T-mobile, its some shitty german office department of the Big company that nobody cares about, basically office that's researching blockchain, just like every major company does to check if this shit is viable, T-Mobile won't fuckin use smartcontracts for 1% of their traffic/usecases in next 10 years>>no microsoft lol who the fuck is yorkeshit is old as fuck, and same argument as Tmobile/google announcment/breadcrumbs about micro from ages ago>BSN is nothingchina hustle>Great Economic Resetmeme>daily updates or perhaps hourly updates of what the project is doing?yeah chainlink marketing is literally most retarded thing in the whole project and disgusting practice about>not talking about price>not answering community questions>not talking about delivering X in Y timeetc etc but keep defending this approach with 5 Billion evaluation, no regulations and no responsibility to deliver. this is basically casino bet, and laughable practice compared to legacy system, real company, real board, and share system (public ICO vs IPO)>>23030627yeah go to warosu, and search mid/end of august, im not going to retype essays about crypto state to deaf ears, also if you think i owe you something, go suck a dick on top of the other dick>>23030562here have a you>>23030572because read my other posts itt, also Rona will be over when (they) think it's over, not to mention a civil war after Trump2020, or Trump in the casket next week because Rona is real.why the fuck would you accumulate meme here, when you can wait for the markets to tell you we are going down or up.price went -50%, crabbing meanwhile BTC is most likely heading lower, theres zero buy demand, supply is coming in bigONE BIG QUESTIONWHERE'S THE OP AND HIS 6 FIGURE STACK
>>23027000ONE BIG QUESTIONWHERE'S THE OP AND HIS 6 FIGURE STACK
>>23030795T-Systems is subcompany from Deutsche Telekom and it will be huge. A lot of anons have no clue how big this will be. I have a friend working for them. Prepare your anusesBtw terrible fud
>>23030795>its some shitty german office department of the Big company that nobody cares aboutT-Systems is a major subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom, on the same level as T-Mobile here in the US.
>>23030817one question, how stupid do you have to be to step into every trap. This is that simpson clown and a garden full of rakes levels retarded
>>23030795>why the fuck would you accumulate meme here, when you can wait for the markets to tell you we are going down or up.Because I legitimately believe Chainlink is worth more than $10. I think anything around or under $10 is a good buy.Also because of this>price went -50%I don't want to miss out on this again.What you say makes sense anon.I think I will hold out with the rest of my investment money for a while and see where the markets go before accumulating more link.I honestly don't believe there will be a civil war or anything earthshaking like that.Everything will be fine.I hope.
>>23030686to make tons of money, supress the price for years, while they developed BAND and got big piece of pie of oracle meme pump, tell public to lock their tokens in staking (80% of supply got locked), while they unloaded millions of millions of millions volume to FOMO public.then they split with Sequia and other backers, locked supply realized they lost 50% of their money overnight and start selling more.Sequia did put a short , CZ did too, rinse repeat with another scam.Futures, Binance, Bitmex etc are the cancer of crypto.LINK shoul've been 10$ last year without Binance :)Your total is 50$ for this courseMy paypal is : >fuckyounewfagswithoutabrain@hot69.com
>>23030709thats weak fud. you are comparing russian unibersity hobbyist startup v. american technology company. guess twice which one's code they're going to implement into their critical infrastructures
>>23028613>In these domainsDo you even have a job? If so, what is it?
>>23030795This guy is still here and still seething
>>23027531link is 95% of my net worthit's going to stay that way
>>23030940Kinda comfy. Woke up sipping coffee listening to a sperg that apparently has my best financial interest at heart.
>>2303089680 million Links were bought out from his exchange so really he lost money
>>23030877>>23030879>"Chainlink is the first public blockchain network to which we are currently providing infrastructure and will provide staking services in the future. This brings us a lot closer to our vision of establishing public blockchains as the basis for numerous use-cases", says Dr. Andreas Dittrich, Head of Blockchain Solutions Center of T-Systems Multimedia Solutions. We will be supporting the Chainlink Network with secure infrastructure and with its planned staking implementation in the future.Do you think T Systems MMS bought LINK tokens to stake at their node ? :) :) :) :) :) :) :)Also their revenue compared to T-Mobile worldwide is laughable. I wont even go into details of what they are handling, but good fuckin implementation.They will push the price to 100$ EOY !>nodes earn LINK>LINK gets soldliterally free money for Dietrich, money that they need probably to feed those 2100 workers because revenue is not profit :)>>23030887trap ? im still waiting for OP to provide his 6 figure LINK stack and listening to podcast, while shopping online, writing with yall deluded fags on my new keyboard is actually a pleasure>>23030891Godspeed>>23030940>arguments failed>choose option : seething or dr;ns>post Seething that will get himHURR DURR>>23031046howdy burger fag
>>23031153yeah yeah 80 Millions tokens were bought, probably by institu----- HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
>>23031174>:)never mind tranny. bunkerchanners like you are always a bit slow
>>23030795>reread technicals about this implementationIt brings access to the decentralized data from the traditional financial markets.Exactly as advertised? How in the world is this nothing?>its not THE T-mobileIt IS THE T-mobile seething retard and they've been primarily focused on Industry 4.0>shit is old as fuckCap related. Quoting:>Of the sessions was the showcase of how blockchain has been instrumental in the hands of enterprises. Speakers from Microsoft, Oracle, T-Systems, Armanino, and other enterprise companies revealed how they have utilized blockchain technology and smart contracts to eliminate intermediaries and waiting times to better serve their customers and become an enterprise that is forward-thinking amidst peers. Yorke Rhodes from Microsoft revealed how he had worked over the past years to expose the company to new online technology to break it forth. He stated that Microsoft had been involved in blockchain technology as early as 2016. This was what brought the surprising collaboration between Microsoft and Sony’s XBOX in 2018 to bring it at par and even beyond Google Stadia. Once again, this is clearly showing zero interest.>china hustleLel okay anon.>memehttps://www.weforum.org/great-reset/I dunno it doesn't look like it.
>>23031309Forgot cap lol
>>23027000come on show your stack, its not like you went MIA as soon as i asked for cap 2 hours ago>>23029200is this thread by 3 digit LINK STACK HOLDER?or LOW 4 DIGIT LARPING AS INTERNET GURU AMA ?LMAO
>>23031333He doesn't have a "stack." He's just a pajeet paid shill with some talking points given to him by smart "con."This thread is full of the same fucking cope deflectionary bullshit combined with a little academia dishonesty to really sell it to the midwit doubters.
>>23027035>Your mother's excellent tutelage
I just like how there hasn't been many LINK threads at all for the last 2 weeks and when someone does a solid bread crumb/education thread for the first time in awhile that goes to 200+ replies suddenly the catalog is full of FUD threads again today. Its fucking magical. Lmao
Is it possible that there will be a token burn? Off one of the big wallets?
>>23027000thanks anon
>>23031306im not a tranny, dont have discord, im white, and dont talk to anyone about crypto. stay deluded. if you think all those posts came from some psy-op retard, you are getting played by your might OP only here. kisses>>23031309not seething, and please gogle what T Systems is, becuase clearly you have zero clue. you can even use google maps, and that yellow dude to walk around the streets of DEUTSCHLAND.about Yorke >lolChina Hustle, Korea Banks, Great Reset, Black Helicopters, SWIFT, Microsoft, XBOX>20$ August>9,2$ OctoberYeah everyone in the whole world, hedge funds, etc are just allergic to money and won't buy this piece of technology at current prices, and they didnt push it further to 30,40,50$ with volume to unload at premium and make hundreds of millions of profit on longs,shorts, and spot.Just fuckin stop, with all your fuckin GREAT PARTNERSHIPS you are missing the most important parts of this discussion>crypto as a whole>markets situation>world situation>2020 as a whole is a meme>>23031381checks out after he went MIA
>>23027675i'd like to see this as well...
>>23030907Their american technology company is already implementing russian university hobbyist startup tech.
>>23027041Im not op but thats the wrong question.Let me illustrate>How are forks more important than dishes?Both are. They accomplish different things.Difference here is that Chainlink is still on its early stages and undervalued. Ethereum does what is advertised already and properly (but the PoS, which is secondary overrall)Oh now redpill for PoS. It is all already written, even the last stages. They are just autistic with audits and testing. As soon as devs are in consensus that it is ready, it will go public.
>>23031528not a psyop gaslighter, and never mentioned discord but specifically your home board smiling retard
>>23031600
>>23027000Will my 70 linkies make me rich? When? How much should I have by when to own a home?
lalalalallalal still waiting and bumping this thread for GURU 100 000 LINK stack OP tutor of /biz/ to finish downloading GIMP because his internet too slow in Bangladesh to download Photoshop and create some fake fuckin larp wallets on binance
>>23031174My argument didn't fail. Your response to proving you had more than 2k link was some feeble excuse about multiple wallets.
>>23031528Replies like the 30 you've made in this thread are the reason I hold LINK. Sure I did some swinging near the top but its why I'll always have 10K I never unload. Its not even your thread but you felt the need to be nearly 9% of the replies which all said nothing other than you sold. Chainlink is clearly going to be leading the next bull cycle and the state of world is seriously because the elite are changing the economic paradigm. You really need to go check out the WEF website. They are verbatim telling us that "trust" itself of institutions is changing and we are moving to a data economy. They chose Chainlink as an integral part. I can't tell if you are FUDing or trying to justify your actions of selling. No one cares what you do. Sure there were more lucrative short term plays but if you want generational wealth and not risk buy rug pulls and the other flavor of the week then you simply DCA into LINK and forget about. Retards have been telling us for years that it would never hit $1, then $5, $10 etc.
>>23031528>please "gogle" what T Systems isI did. I highlighted the important parts for you anon.>lolAstonishing argument right there.So basically your argument boils down to this.>Yeah ok if Chainlink is so mighty fine why hasn't it skyrocketed to triple digits hurr durrYou said so yourself markets=/= fundamentals
>>23031600>check em
>>23027106This has been already answered but let me put forth an extra bit. As a complement, not as its own.1. The selling point of Link is that it is decentralised. Failing that the project fails and Sergey still has plenty of Link to care about that.2. Independent tokens are common for a reason. They are good to avoid people to want to hack or destabilise for profit.If it is run on Eth, then stealing the Eth through an exploit gives some nice profit. If they get Link, price plummets and all ends up being for naught.Think of it like Amazon paying their upper ranks partly with stocks locked for years down the road. Incentive to leak info or whatever is way lower.
>>23031744i literally posted multiple buy orders from 18' with more LINK that you can smell while you provided zero you fuckin ratlip from pakistan>>23031745im out boys, see you in a month, on November 4
>>23031650>>23031762thanks for confirming, stepped into another rake
>>23027000when wilkl the fat russian scammer stop making me lose all my fucking money
>>23031794stepped in the rake that i got the worst person in 19' biz banned, and fought him in multiple threads for months. checks out you are fuckin imbecile. he basically created every trip for leak threads, but you probably were the person bumping this shit for gets because your 80iq brain can't understand half the page of whitepaper and what blockchain is.seriously was pleasure to talking to fucks like you./biz/ is dead, all of you faggots are filled with anger after holding -50%.see you in a month, bookmarking this thread, and removing /biz/ from bookmarks for a month.useless fuckin site since August 2020
>>23029053>37k eurolmao
>>23031888and stay gone trip nigger
>>23031888>all of you faggots are filled with angerThe amount of projection here is astounding. None of are angry at you, its more a combination of humor/pity
>>23031888checked>tripfag is being an argumentative little fuck the whole thread>calls everybody else angryseems plausible faggot
>>23027106From the infographic (you read it, right anon?)
>>23031934>>23031980>literally showed the trip to counter discord tranny>trip was active in like 5 threads total>omg it checks out>cap provided shows "DONT SELL LINK, DONT FALL FOR FUD" from 1 year ago after another nothinburger conference>Link literally dumped after it>oh holy shit attack that dude, he's the worstcombined IQ of you two doesn't reach 3 figures, just like LINK won't ever do.
This thread is full of people that didnt read shit on chainlink.tired of reading nowmoving on
>>23027000When staking and triplets?
>>23032097Still here? Shall we continue then?>>23031753
>>23032097never said discord tranny, just a tranny.Discord has been a nice gas lighting tactic for most of the time to obfuscate the actual origins trip fags
>>23027000What’s the target price for link to accomplish its function and why is it zero?Also checked
Will Arbitrum and Chainlink make ETH useless?
>>23032097Read the whole thread, you actually btfo OP pretty goodThanks for stopping by anon
>>23032163>still here>literally provided wikipedia screenshot of company info that states subsidiaryholy fuckin shit, i was doing you a favor skipping your response, LINK 50$ end of week, keep hodling, great REAL WORLD use cases, totally not a fuckin vaporwave nodes, for free tokens provided by team itself (half of those market sold instantly by receipents, and thats speculation from narnia,for sure Dietrich is holding for his life, hes a link marine)>>23032165fuck you>>23032228and fuck you tooNOW FOR REAL IM OUTSEE YA NOVEMBER 4
I didn’t think someone could be so ass blasted about Chainlink they spent several hours shitposting. Impressive, really.
>>23027000pump coming?
>>23032261>SeethingAt least try to provide an argument moron jc
>>23032267Is this your first time witnessing mental illness, little lady?
>>23032261yes bunkerchan tranny, stay gone, and enjoy your leftshit hell hole as long as it is online, will not survive till November 4
>>23031792This nigga wont show the wallets specifically for 1 of 2 reasons. He still holding tons (like discord trannies do) or he sold too early
>>23031792>34 posts by this ID
>>23032647the second, and it is not a discord tranny mongo. Its a raid that has been going on since h8han shut down
>>23027000Have any resources to get more knowledgeable in crypto? My ass is ignorant, but I see graphs and green arrows and it makes me wanna buy.
>>23032228Lmao no he didn't. None of his replies were technical in the slightest. He just screeched the whole time about nonsense. I would argue people should read the whole thread for the exact opposite reason especially the first 100 replies or so when OP was answering questions/genuine doubts that were in good faith
>34 posts by this id
>>23028828Dude... we’re all up 1500% on link. I’m sorry your brain was fried by porn and vidya, but these things don’t happen overnight. Zoom out and be patient. Huge corrections are the norm in crypto. If you think you have the answers, go ahead and try to swing. Just stop your autistic screeching at those of us patient enough to DCA with discipline. We’re making tons of money though it’s not too late to join us.
>>23027000get in here>>23032697>>>23032697
>>23032319trump is winning 2020>>23032647you didnt match shit ,i posted sell orders, buy orders below 5000 sats, and never had external wallet for crypto and never will. kraken and coinbase is backed by real money why the fuck would i trust paper wallet. you didnt provide a single screenshot that you own/owned more than 0 LINK. so stfu you projecting faggot. LINK is 9,2$ so i sold everything above that, now you can daydream about 16$ while LINK is heading for low 5's>>23032833yeah i was not technical completely when i talked about market situation,world situation, average joe vs crypto knowledge. i definetely pulled sha256,deco,mixicles, etc out of my ass.yeah i also was not technical when i bought LINK for 4000 sats or 2800 SATS. you can fuckin dream about that level of entry today in your sleep boy.told ya in august, told ya today.fuckin cultist ? don't listen, go in circle jerk while im laughing my ass off.>>23032948cool story bro, its not like i bought link below 5000 sats in 2018 and unloaded at 100 000+ sats. now you can sell below 90K for a week or so, let's see another week closed in red in 5 hours and see what happens next.
>>23033134hahaha based tripfag coming through for his dopamine hits after officially leaving the thread four times
>>23027122Storing link in a wallet technically affects the price as it reduces the market supply but not total link in circulation
>>23033172I FUCKIN LOVE LAUGHING AT THESE FAGGOTS 5 HOURS CHECK THIS FUCKIN GRAPH HOLY FUCKIN SHIT
What do you think about api3 op?
>>23033134I'll bite. This was the profits of selling 3k linkies at the top minus 8k to buy back 1000 at the bottom
>>23033517I'll bite. post pict of the sharpie in the pooper or larp.
>>23033134You’re like the bizarro version of 42 in terms of sentiment, but somehow equally gay and capable of nuking interesting threads.
>>23027012Doracle hyper gonnect da worl
$1000 eoy
>>23027000>the most important project in crypto here, meme free.>meme freeThe importance of this project is to show the world how fucking big of a meme link itself is, and also how retarded linkies are.
>>23033991OP of this interesting thread literally larped about having 6 figure LINK stack and bounced as soon i called for a cap of it, so you basically eating a larp from some kid with ~10000$ or less in crypto like he's Jesus himself preaching.same fuckin retards posted here mid august, end of august, beginning of september.caused gulible anons 50% of their net worth.fuck you and whover defends it, fuck them aswell.LINK to 20$ was a dream scenario, and not taking profits and preaching such bullshit deserves me coming here hot with facts.
>>23032195There's two possible answers to this.The first is that ETH's decentralisation and security guarantees will keep it as the settlement layer, while Arbitrum does most of the heavy lifting. This is the most likely outcome, and means that ETH will still "fill up" with transactions, but each individual transaction will represent much more work, as it will be the final settlement of a lot of Arbitrum computation done off chain. Kind of like Arbitrum being a GPU to the Ethereum computer. Ethereum will still run to its maximum capacity, that capacity will just be higher than before.Option B is that Arbitrum actually facilitates off chain setllement, which has been spitballed by one of the Arbitrum devs. If this happens and works at scale, the role of Ethereum in the entire stack becomes more question. IMO this is much less likely, my money is on the first outcome.
wasssa wassa wassa up lets go 300 replies
>>23032848called op delivers
>>23034945>>23027000OP OF THIS THREAD WENT MISSING IN ACTION AFTER LARPING HE HAS 6 FIGURE STACKMAYDAY MAYDAYTANGO DOWN
>>23031745>Retards have been telling us for years that it would never hit $1, then $5, $10 etcLikewise retards have been telling us for years that it would hit targets "x year" and then it didnt for another two years lmao
>>23035026Bruh do you have anything better to do?
What is the WEF announcement supposed to entail? Buffett said we’d have to wait on sergey for anything..
>>23035080nah, i like owning plebs on chan
>>23027000Newfag here. Will i make some decent money or not?
>>23035205How does -95% sound?
>>23035080Like sit in a thread jerking yourself off over a blatant larp?
>>23035026Dude what is your advice then?
>>23035359on what topic
>>23027093So you’re poor and an average portfolio 28 year old
>>23035080Than calling out faggot stinky linkies? Not really. Kill yourself, plebbitfag.
>>23035397Chainlink. Should we buy here?
>>23035404>4 figs ETH>poorHe's got more than you'll ever make from this shithole
>>23035466fuck no, either buy lower or buy safer on confirmation that this dump is over.also >BTC>november 4 USA>Rona (flu season around the corner)>oil>banks around the worldshit is crazy, hold cash, if you will buy higher you will lose on some profits but it will be safer, if you buy now and it dumps to March levels you are going to get heart attack or ultra depressed at autumn which is a depressing time either way.
>>23035593What's Nov 4? Riots election?
>>23027000If Eth doesn't succeed speeding up their network will chainlink move to a new blockchain?
>>23035518depends if he means 4 figures eth in $ or # of eth lol. $1000 in eth vs 1000 eth is a big difference.
>>23035710It's likely Arbitrum will solve that problem before ETH2.0 has to. You should watch Ed Felten's keynote from SmartCon, it's only 20 minutes long and very easy to understand. Possibly one of the most important presentations in crypto this year:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxYq1GwzNcI
>>23035670yeah whole world is watching, also check USA banks for 3rd quarter results, check fuckin oil, check gold, DXY, and other shit. it's all fuckin connected.not to mention BITMEX current situation, and current state of crypto, like how much longer can yield farming and other defi scams can go before shit goes south and they are all getting sued, KYC'd or other shit.hate to spoil the party, but in my objective view:crash would be awesome for crypto, cleanse the pallet, get rid of 1000's useless fuckin projects, regulate the exchanges, put a fuckin leash on niggers and chinks running futures etc.we basically need world war in crypto, before we go into a green field where there's only sun, grass, and hot bitches on it.
>>23028453It is unfathomable to me how people are still reposting the same braindead FUD that has been refuted daily for 3 years now How do you remember to breathe?
>>23035466You're never going to buy an absolute bottom or sell an absolute top. You just buy and keep buying if you think it will be worth more in the future.
>>23035802>crash would be awesome for crypto, cleanse the pallet, get rid of 1000's useless fuckin projects,How new are you? Crypto has an endless supply of useless products. There will never be a "cleanse". Most of the 2017 ICO shitcoins have disappeared and all that happened is 1000 DeFi and yield shitcoins appeared in their place.
imagine still shilling this to newfags kek
>>23035802>muh doooooooomKek nvm you're a retard. Assuming you were old enough (which it's clear you're probably a teenager) you would've been the one to sell your stocks in 2010 and been permanently btfo
>>23035905yeah that's why introducing a crypto project should be regulated globally and will be for sure in the future.all it takes is USA or EU putting one paper out, and it will be illegal, chased globally.so it will go like this>put out scam>EU/USA citizen buys it>loses 90% of his money, never delivered the product from whitepaper>EU/USA citizen reports crime>creator and every person connected to the project is punishable by EU/USA law>extradition >jailwithout bowing down to rules you won't be able to buy/sell/promote/operate/engage with the project of those 2 molochs, or you will be in jail.or simpler, the project websites etc will be banned by all ISP's in X location.exchanges won't serve those projects to X customers.simple, and its coming sooner than later :)
>>23035977yeah im a teenager, nice counterargument, check your blood pressure you fat fuck
>>23036043You have issues. You've left like 15 times. Really indictive of obsessive and narcissistic tendencies.let go man
>>23035802That doesn't mean that the cryptos with actual potential and future will be in the red as well. That would be weird and unexpected to see. Imagine, shitcoins like ripple and everything else that isn't link, eth, or btc dump 90%, while these 3 gain some %. (Peak delusion here, dont blame me.)>>23036006You are saying like this isn't happening every other week. You know how many scamcoins like onecoin we have had? Did suddenly all of crypto become illegal? NO. stupid argument.
>>23036177Let me also say, that not only did they lose 90% but they lost 100% of the money invested. But to some degree, I agree with you. A cleansing is needed. On the other hand might cleansing might look different. The gamechangers will moon while other pathetic piece of shit cryptos continue to crab or continue to bleed slowly.
>>23027000Is the XRP patent dangerous for chainlink? How likely is it at this point for link to get beaten by a competitor?
>>23036043Lmao 45 posts by this ID. How angry are you?
>>23036206The thing that has not been answered is if one is so confident that the entire game is doomed, why play 3 years ago? Or to look at it another way, why continue to bet on link after the google/coinbase pump/crash, but not now? What has changed? Fundamentally nothing, the project's only gotten stronger, but this poster doesn't talk about fundamentals, and yet they made a poor market decision last year (or they have yet to reveal that they perfectly swung their stack at that time, I don't know). Point being this excessive shitposting is the equivalent of running a victory lap when the race hasn't even really begun yet.
>>23036323I haven't read most of the posts in this thread. Yet. Just came from work, and answered to these 2 posts. I'll read it now. Or if someone has tl:dr.
>>23027000What would be a conservative, optimistic, and pessimistic price prediction for end of 2021?
>>23036374conservative: $10.00optimistic: $25.00pessimistic: $1.50
>>23027000Nice digits by the way. Since this thread's still up, can someone explain to me the purpose of Towncrier? I kinda get it, but not sure how it benefits LINK.I remember service agreement stuff in the github. Was this going to come before staking/DECCO? I cant remember if it was mentioned at smartcon for the timing
>>23029115>Everyone here from the sub 40c days have 6 figure stacksy-yeah haha I sure didn't just bough 1k linkies in 2017 for the meme without understanding the tech haha
>>23036177cleansing = total marketcap going down, pulling every project down.for sure BTC/ETH/LINK and other projects with actual fuckin usecases will survive and pump in the recovery parabolic move up.that money tho, has to come from somewhere.foolish to think that 2017 mania is coming back anytime soon. data on chain shows that people buying at 2018 didn't capitulate,i personally met a dude in friend circle who's still holding -90% alts bags, underwater BTC and ETH bag.those people who bought the top they need to tap out, maybe some of them went out already in March, but what happened and on what levels BTC stopped in August is not optimistic.there's no buying pressure with current world situation, people aint going to buy fuckin BTC en masse.but some of you are just going full delusion.LINK did more than 100X. it can crab at 5$ for years who gives a shit. Sergi and team have more money, and more tokens to literally dump for years they dont give a shit about price and they wont discuss it.So basically what's left is speculation, staking, nodes blabla.maybe another 3 fuckin years of radio silent development
>>23037106to close this tyrade of mine today, i will repeat same thing like in august.DONT GET CAUGHT WHEN THOSE WHALE ALERTS START TO POP OFF.FOR SURE YOU ALL WILL CASH OUT THE TOP, AND FOR SURE ANONS WILL THEY YOU WHEN.think for yourself, set goals, price points, protect your fuckin money.and now im really out. peace
>>23037148Please just go for good this time, nothing you have said is enlightening or helpful.