/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.22921068]

You faggots told me this shitcoin was going over $1000

[Anonymous No.22921093]

>>22921068
Nobody ever made that claim on /biz/

[Anonymous No.22921159]

>>22921093
It was made hundreds of times you lying pajeet

[Anonymous No.22921179]

> He fell for the chainlink meme

[Anonymous No.22921284]

>>22921068
It will go to 81k in some year.

[Anonymous No.22921316]

Yeah I did not say September

[Anonymous No.22921321]

>>22921068
It is, Sergey is going to announce staking and flip the switch and it'll be $2000 overnight,
Buy the dip

[Anonymous No.22921423]

>>22921068
Wait you thought it was serious?

[Anonymous No.22921452]

>>22921159
>He listened to /biz/

[Anonymous No.22921456]

>>22921068
i also said it going to double digits and it did
i am also saying it will go to triple digits next year and it will

[Anonymous No.22921460]

>>22921068
Not if they fail to deliver, obviously.

Oracle wanted Chainlink by end of Q3 (i.e. tomorrow), but Sergey flaked.

[Anonymous No.22921510]

It is though

[Anonymous No.22921689]

>>22921068
What part of EOY you not get?

[Anonymous No.22921708]

>>22921068
>he trusted a bunch of anonymous on a forum

[Anonymous No.22921723]

>>22921460

Do you know the details of the partnership?

[Anonymous No.22921851]

Year's not over.

[Anonymous No.22922573]

>>22921460
You are a retard. None of this is remotely true.

[Anonymous No.22922605]

Arbitrum makes Chainlink obsolete, you got had. We're all in Arbitrum while we shill LINK it works every time.

[Anonymous No.22922643]

>>22921068
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons

[Anonymous No.22922657]

>>22921068
>>22921284
Oh, you thought we meant dollars? I thought we had been clear that we meant satoshis. It has already met the 1k then 81k satoshi targets. The pump and dump is over. Sorry for any confusion caused.

[Anonymous No.22923244]

>>22921068
it is nigger