[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 206 KB, 800x800, 1579708609062.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22360514 No.22360514 [Reply] [Original]

How can LINK be worth more than the blockchain it is built on? You do know that if LINK has a 5 trillion MC while ETH has a 500B market cap it would make a lot of sense to sybil attack ETH and kill LINK. You know that right? LINK needs ETH.

>> No.22360565

>>22360514
imagine thinking a json parser can ever be worth that....imagine not realizing ibm, msft, jp morgan, will all have oracles at that point.

>> No.22360574

blockchain agnostic
btfo

>> No.22360578

>>22360514
Blockchain agnostic bud

>> No.22360594 [DELETED] 

>>22360578
>>22360574
Wrapped ETH is still kill when a sybil attack is performed

>> No.22360648

>>22360594
good thing we are only concerned with wrapped LINK

>> No.22360660

>>22360574
>>22360578
Wrapped LINK is still kill when a sybil attack is performed

>> No.22360793

>>22360514
>How can Amazon be worth more then JavaScript?

Or whatever the fuck code it is built on

>> No.22360814

How can google be worth more than the internet providers?

>> No.22360821

>>22360793
>>22360814
See>>22360660

>> No.22360845

>>22360814
OP BTFO

>> No.22360848

>>22360514
Because Fantom is higher in MC which is null why see gay partnered with them. Eth is going to die on it’s own. Link will moon. And Fantom will have everything running on it.

>> No.22360884

>>22360845
You're not BTFOing anyone when you refuse to argue technicals >>22360660

>> No.22360970

>>22360514
How can software be worth more than the hardware it's running on?

It's like asking why Google can be worth more than hardware producers like Intel or AMD

>> No.22361004

>>22360970
Yes please keep repeating the same line like 5 other retards in this thread.

>> No.22361771

Bump

>> No.22361939

>>22360814
Ownership of Google shares does not allow 51% of shareholders (post-PoS) to collude and reassign ownership of ISPs to those same shareholders. Granted ETH and LINK would both lose value in this scenario. Not all value (see ETC still standing after multiple 51% attacks).

>>22360660
Don't bother. False equivalencies will be batted about to drown you out. The real and only answer is that organizing a 51% attack once ETH goes to PoS will be impossible due to a combination of disbursement of tokens, game theory, and the self-interest of the attackers in protecting their own stake and not trusting one another enough to coordinate. The only realistic scenario would be terrorist in nature, suicidal, catastrophic, and technically demanding where they have to first withdraw LINK that is tied up in contracts before hijacking the spending. Highly unlikely that an actor would have the will and the resources to pull it off.

>> No.22361974

>>22360970
Imagine believing this holy kek.