/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.22171964]

Just as I had imagined.

“No Vendor Lock-in” (one single log-in, access to all providers)

Easier and familiar authentication (Login to iExec with Google)

Easy funds management: initial free credits + fiat labeling rather than crypto

"Always Best Price" value proposition for computing power

Easier workflow: front-end for choosing computing resources + task execution follow-up + easy result download

Iexec will be THE top gainer of 2021. It is the best usecase of blockchain tech we have seen this far.
I may wait for a market recovery and consolidate my entire portfolio into it.
This is the one.

[Anonymous No.22172063]

I hope they have some good news for september, this summer has been underwhelming

[Anonymous No.22172067]

>>22171964
we already knew this shit, RLC is going to $300

[Anonymous No.22172159]

>>22171964
why is there still no adoption though?

[Anonymous No.22172221]

>>22171964
>0 use
its over i sold this dogshit

[Anonymous No.22172230]

>>22172159
Because adoption phase just started ed boi

[Anonymous No.22172424]

It's insane. Top10 mktcap this year.

[Anonymous No.22172543]

>>22171964
>Easier workflow: front-end for choosing computing resources + task execution follow-up + easy result download


I got out of RLC a year ago but still been following closely. I truly believe that once the market stops bleeding (we may have 2-3 month downtrend before BTC bottoms at 8-9k who knows) I will go all in and load up everything on RLC.

This literally has a decent chance of 1000x during the next bullrun no joke.

[Anonymous No.22172639]

anyone have a screencap of that thread a few weeks back where a devanon actually tried using iExec and it failed to print "Hello World"?
kek

[Anonymous No.22172810]

>>22171964
I have 1660 barrels will I make it?

[Anonymous No.22172836]

>>22171964
CHEAPEST BECAUSE ITS GOING TO FUCKING 0

[Anonymous No.22172851]

>>22172639
That was fud. Main net was switching to V5 when he did that. Go read the medium article a few weeks later about the anon who set up a crypto price feed on iexec using coinbase’s api

[Anonymous No.22172950]

>>22172810
I got 5000 and it feels so heavy right now

[Anonymous No.22173011]

>>22172950
Stay strong. It won’t be easy. You will be tested.

[Anonymous No.22173044]

>>22172950

If BTC breaks down mentally prepare yourself for 50 cent RLC thats the downside. There is 0 upside in holding this coin for the next few months.

[Anonymous No.22173145]

>>22171964
OCEAN made RLC obsolete

[Anonymous No.22173153]

>>22172950
Same, but it doesnt really feel heavy. Investing is a longterm thing, 99% of the time, when you're trying to make big money.
So it was with BTC, ETH, and Link in their respective earlier stages.
Browse less, hold more.

[Anonymous No.22173197]

>>22171964
That's nice but I don't give a shit. We need dApps using iexec.

[Anonymous No.22173250]

>>22171964
it's digital dogshit

[Anonymous No.22173261]

>>22173044
>0 upside for the next few months
>announcements to come this month

[Anonymous No.22173450]

>>22173261

Announcements dont mean shit if BTC dumps bro you know that right?

[Anonymous No.22173552]

>>22173450
So you have a crystal ball then? Go short BTC 20x leverage if that's what you believe

[Anonymous No.22173598]

>>22171964
Oh wow the shitcoin is praising itself and yet
5 VERSIONS 5 DUMPS
0 ADOPTION
AND 6 PAJEETS SHILLING THIS GARBAGE EVERY SEASON

[Anonymous No.22173638]

>>22173552

No im not that insane I am just saying BTC is super correlated with SP500 since March crash and the markets are looking shaky after super tech stock rallys.

Between now and end of year there is way more risk in staying in then stablecoining up which is why im gonna wait it out on the sidelines for at least two-three months.

[Anonymous No.22173658]

>>22173450
Not neccesarily. Btc has no utility in and of itself.
If blockchain techs start emerging with actual real world usecases, like iexec, it'll just start performing with tech stocks instead of BTC. As long as you dont hold crypto PnDs, fuck btc.

[Anonymous No.22173671]

>>22172159
No one needs generic CPU power anymore. GPUs are like 1000x more efficient, and if you need precision CPU calculations you probably need data persistence too. It would have been a great idea in the 1990s.

[Anonymous No.22173712]

>>22173638
that's your problem nigga

[Anonymous No.22173900]

I have a make it stack and I am NSMDO. Buying RLC now is like buying $10 Ethereum or $100 BTC.

[Anonymous No.22173905]

>>22173671
Iexec does GPU

[Anonymous No.22174276]

[Anonymous No.22174301]

10b market cap 2021 EOY

[Anonymous No.22174362]

Nice try Gilles, you god damn lazy frog

[Anonymous No.22174366]

NSMDO

[Anonymous No.22174479]

>>22173900
is an 81k stack enough?

[Anonymous No.22175190]

>>22174479
Try to get 100k then maybe

[Anonymous No.22175206]

Great, now I can choose from AWS, GCP or Azure which overpriced cloud I want to use AND have to go through iexecs shit UI without all the massive software/config stack of the clouds. Honestly, who is going to use this ?

[Anonymous No.22175245]

>>22174479
I wish I was you. Maybe you can let me hang out in one of your massive mansions one day.

[Anonymous No.22175377]

>>22172230
Yeah but if I remember correctly they've had a functioning product for a very long time now and have announced potential clients multiple times.
I've hodled this shit from 30 cents and will probably hodl for a year longer but it just feels very in vain.

[Anonymous No.22175465]

>>22175377
They’ve had a functioning product but now it’s a finished product. See the difference.

[Anonymous No.22175864]

[Anonymous No.22176948]

>>22173671
THIS. FOR SOME REASON IEXEC HOLDERS HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM UNDERSTANDING THIS. NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT CPUS CENTRALIZED SERVICES HAVE ALREADY MASTERED THAT.

>>22173905
RNDR IS COMING AFTER IEXEC IF IT EVER GAINS ADOPTION. RNDR HAS THE PATENTS FOR "ALLOCATION OF GPU RESOURCES ACROSS MULTIPLE CLIENTS" AND "TOKEN-BASED BILLING MODEL FOR SERVER-SIDE RENDERING SERVICE".

ITS OVER IEXEC PAJEETS


https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/59/8c/ed/c9d132d2becf9f/US9197642.pdf
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/17/a9/82/08a73743fba53a/US8803892.pdf

[Anonymous No.22177255]

>>22176948
>Pajeet
Says the pajeet shilling his shitcoin in a foreign thread.

[Anonymous No.22178325]

>>22176948
You literally just said no one will use iexec (which can do everything render does and a fuck ton more), but they will use rndr. See your fault in logic?

[Anonymous No.22178516]

>>22177255
shut up

>>22178325
iExec is an incomplete network. If you check right now who is lending their power it is hardly anyone and most of the nodes are ran by iExec themselves. On the other hand OTOY has had 16k GPUs sign up to lend computing power

[Anonymous No.22178619]

>>22178325
Lol RNDR has the superior tech brainlet. Do 10 mins of research. Google already bent the knee. Octane is coming on all apple devices. Has a large customer base (people are actually using the network). Iexec has nothing.

[Anonymous No.22178844]

Hypothetically if they managed to combine the major cloud providers (AWS, Google, Microsoft, IBM, Alibaba) into 1 interface why wouldnt people just use chainlink instead?

[Anonymous No.22178914]

>>22178619
Render is a .25 stablecoin until all team tokens are sold (a lot)

[Anonymous No.22179048]

>>22178914

> A .25 stablecoin that isn't .25

[Anonymous No.22179072]

>>22172424
If that were the case it'd be worth $5-$10 dollars by now... I feel like this project has to work on their marketing which will probably take some time i'm not trying to FUD.. Perhaps it will pump hard next year.

[Anonymous No.22179073]

>>22178844
What do you mean by this? RNDR uses smartcontracts so perhaps they will partner with chainlink for some price feed data on rndr jobs but how can chainlink do what the RNDR network is doing? They are completely different usescases

>>22178914
Wrong

[Anonymous No.22179408]

>>22178619
>machine learning augmented rendering workflows
oh fuck off, this shit is just as much bullshit as every other iexec killer you fuckos have posted

[Anonymous No.22179549]

>>22176948
>>22178619
Serious question, bagholding aside. What do the kind of virgins who post this shit all day look like IRL?

[Anonymous No.22179579]

>>22179408
Shut up pussy. You know John Carmack, THE John Carmack? He is using RNDR for machine learning. Who is using iExec?

https://twitter.com/id_aa_carmack/status/1219461206152548353?lang=en

[Anonymous No.22179657]

>>22179549
We look like this.

Pic related is a former Google CEO of 8 yrs, is on the OTOY advisory board and helped get the RNDR partnership with google.

[Anonymous No.22179849]

>>22179657
Well then no amount of money is going to cope with the fact that your wife cheats on you with a real man

[Anonymous No.22179896]

>>22179072
You’re probably not wrong. The marketing and such is supposed to be ramping up to 100% this month which is why we’re on a little tense. The announcement this September could potentially break my confidence in this project, but it could be very exciting and lead to a nice pump.

Anyways, I agree that RLC won’t pump to current Link levels until this time next year. I could be wrong, but as you said it takes time to build your marketing.

[Anonymous No.22179903]

>>22179408
Do you actually understand any of the "skycomputing" technologies and their use cases or do you just do a pajeet tier high level overview?

I swear some of you are hopeless.

[Anonymous No.22179977]

>>22179657
Again iexec does everything rndr does and so much more. You’re dust in the wind my friend. Lmao. Seeth, cope, and dilate tranny.

[Anonymous No.22180089]

>>22179977
>Again iexec does everything rndr does and so much more. You’re dust in the wind my friend. Lmao. Seeth, cope, and dilate tranny.


iExec is an academics wet dream. They can waste as much time as they want while working on purely theoretical features in their project that nobody asked for WHILE getting paid to do this because of millions of dollars in ICO funding.

RNDR is ran by an actually company that was responsible for bringing in the paradigm from CPU to GPU processing. RNDR has tons of high level advisors on their board whose reputations are at stake. RNDR has been recognized by all of the major tech companies (litearlly almost every FAANG company has talked about RNDR) while nobody gives a shit about iExec.

We are coming for your MCAP and we are going to gobble it all up buddy, dont say you weren't warned.

[Anonymous No.22180421]

>>22179549
Anyone that posts all caps on the internet is either under the age of 12 or over the age of 50

[Anonymous No.22180557]

>>22180421
This is horrible cope. You know you are losing

[Anonymous No.22180587]

>>22171964
my penis is hard after reading that

i'm going all in

[Anonymous No.22180711]

whats with the low IQ Render cucks?

[Anonymous No.22180777]

>>22180711
single digit

[Anonymous No.22180818]

>>22180777
IQ render bagholders.
Just read #3 and leave.

[Anonymous No.22180838]

>>22180089
isn't your shitty coin a $0.25 stablecoin?
explain how it will grow

[Anonymous No.22180962]

>>22180818
Just read these patents and leave. If iExec tries to encroach on GPU computing they are going to have to spend their entire ICO funds on legal disputes!

ALLOCATION OF GPU RESOURCES ACROSS MULTIPLE CLIENTS" AND "TOKEN-BASED BILLING MODEL FOR SERVER-SIDE RENDERING SERVICE"

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/59/8c/ed/c9d132d2becf9f/US9197642.pdf
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/17/a9/82/08a73743fba53a/US8803892.pdf


>>22180838
There is only a price peg on the floor. This means if RNDR token ever goes under 25 cents OTOY will guarantee 0.25 worth of computing. However the performance that one token can do scales with the increase of price

[Anonymous No.22181019]

>>22171964
>fiat labeling
coin not needed?

[Anonymous No.22181068]

>>22180962
oh wow so a guy has a patent on using a "token" to pay for specifically rendering services in the US. good thing iexec is in france.

[Anonymous No.22181095]

> iExec will soon be known to be the easiest way to get the cheapest computing power on the market.

this is so pumpable if they manage multiple cloud provider partnerships

essentially the airbnb of cloud computing

>>22180962
make your own thread?
these are 2 unrelated projects...

>>22181019
>what is a RLC/USD pair
brainlet?

[Anonymous No.22181099]

Meanwhile in the real world...

https://deadline.com/2020/09/weta-digital-pacts-with-amazon-web-services-for-cloud-based-visual-effects-and-animation-1234568247/

[Anonymous No.22181118]

>>22181019
if you used fiat, you would need to tie in banks and third party payment systems and hire people to manage your accounts receivable. the blockchain is your order book, your ledger, and your management. all theyd be doing is telling you what your rlc is worth in dollars but the blockchain would keep all of its important functionality.

[Anonymous No.22181169]

>>22181068
That means they cant get adoption here in the states retard, and that is what matters the most.

Here is a loser developer of yours claiming that adoption is hard while RNDR has adoption done down to the bone.

>>22181095
No this is my thread now.


>>22181118
Mental gymnastics, token not needed.

[Anonymous No.22181175]

>>22181099
bullish for clould computing crypto projects no?

>shitting on a $100m project in a $500B+ industry

[Anonymous No.22181247]

>>22181099

Meanwhile in the real world...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2017/10/03/with-google-and-facebook-connections-otoys-render-token-aims-to-help-fulfill-future-vr-demand/#7e907aa146d8


"OTOY’s Render token could be well-positioned to do so. This year, it secured a deal to provide the entire rendering pipeline for Facebook — the social network’s virtual reality camera data uses OTOY. “OTOY has long been on the cutting edge of rendering technology. Their products were a natural fit for our efforts in pushing media to a new level of immersion,” said Eric Cheng, Facebook’s head of immersive media, by email. "

[Anonymous No.22181252]

>>22181169
youre comparing a gpu rendering project to a blockchain cloud computing project
gtfo brainlet

[Anonymous No.22181281]

>>22181247
>Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
>paying for articles
cool marketing

[Anonymous No.22181284]

>>22181252
RNDR focuses on GPU cloud processing, both projects are under the same umbrella of cloud computing.

[Anonymous No.22181330]

>>22181281
Cope you sad pajeet. Zuckerberg could say to your face that RNDR is being used and you still would prefer your French tranny scam coin. It is SO over for you and iExec just look at the charts right now. RLC is dropping all the way down to 50 cents while RNDR is painting a bull flag

[Anonymous No.22181331]

>>22181284
how does Render prove the task was actually completed?
it doesn't
blockchain not needed
Render is a rendering projects... its in the fucking name

[Anonymous No.22181366]

>>22181330
>cope
aka you are defeated and throwing out biz buzz words

you lose ,go back to your render threads

[Anonymous No.22181368]

>>22181247
OTOY is on the front line already

[Anonymous No.22181388]

>>22171964
I hope you have all been accumulating.

[Anonymous No.22181430]

>>22181284
>both projects are under the same umbrella of cloud computing
>that means my narrow patent controls your project? question mark?
>rndr has a US patent, so who cares about iexec connections to china
retard

[Anonymous No.22181433]

>>22181331
You are the definition of retarded. I have never seen a kind of fud where "how will the client know that his job is done". I'm not even going to respond to that kind of garbage FUD.

John Carmack is using RNDR for machine learning, something that you cant do on CPUs because it takes way too long. GPU power is not just limited to rendering only.

On the other hand iExec had a terrible collapse due to someone executing print("hello world") on the iExec network. What a shame that you can't see the light anon.

https://twitter.com/id_aa_carmack/status/1219461206152548353?lang=en

>>22181368
Exactly, OTOY is on the frontline and they are having no problems with adoption right now. Adoption for them is already given because they have over a decade working with industry leaders.

[Anonymous No.22181506]

>>22181430
LOL. What connection to china? If you are talking about pic related it doesn't mean anything because the connection to Chinese companies is based solely on their collaboration in confidential computing. They are sharing information to make their own independent in-house solutions. Can't believe you didn't realize that.

https://confidentialcomputing.io/

[Anonymous No.22181577]

>>22181506
im talking about haiwu he, DYOR. nobody is buying your shill coin, go back to discord.

[Anonymous No.22181581]

>>22181433
pic related

>>22181506
>only blockchain company in the confidentialcomputing.io
okay?

[Anonymous No.22181633]

>>22181577
Huawei is in the pic dumb cocksucker. You are hopeless.

>>22181581
Short term solution to onboard artists, it won't be there after it gets listed on a good CEX. Why hasn't iExec been listed as potential consideration for coinbase listing?

[Anonymous No.22181652]

>>22181581
LMAOOOOOOOO
what a joke

[Anonymous No.22181659]

>>22181506
Connections to China:
https://medium.com/@mrmonopoly/iexec-is-vital-to-president-xis-blockchain-mission-63640bf50c4d

[Anonymous No.22181670]

>>22181581
Forgot pic. Try to FUD your way out of this one.

[Anonymous No.22181731]

>>22181670
thats the only positive to Render
coinbase is shady and requires a huge token payment/gift to get listed

why are you still in a iexec thread?
scared because you bought at 25 cents?

[Anonymous No.22181742]

>>22181659
This means absolutely nothing. If China likes iExec then the state has already taken its tech.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/1-in-5-companies-say-china-stole-their-ip-within-the-last-year-cnbc.html


And regardless American company integration is FAR better than some random Chinese breadcrumbs. Means nothing numbnuts.

[Anonymous No.22181794]

>>22181731
I am in the iExec thread because if you bought when I was shilling you would have done a 5x, and now as price goes closer and closer to 25c the breakout that eventually happens will blast a new hole in iExec holders. Look at your pathetic shitcoin, all it does is dump you are about to go under 1 dollar. How does that make you feel?

[Anonymous No.22181821]

>>22181742
How naive can you be to think Haiwu doesn't know about how the Chinese Government behaves?

[Anonymous No.22181856]

>>22181821
Ok you are hopeless. I dont give a shit about Haiwu faggot. Your shitcoin is of no interest to these top companies.

[Anonymous No.22181923]

>>22181856
if you say so, lmao

[Anonymous No.22181977]

>>22181794
thanks for bumping the thread friend :)

[Anonymous No.22181983]

>>22181742
>>22181794
>>22181856
I've been out of my position since 1.50. But I would rather be holding RLC right now than be someone as miserable as you. Does a guy who spends his day FUDing some random crypto shittoken have meaningful relationships? Do you get laid regularly?

[Anonymous No.22182012]

>>22181330
Lmao fiddy was a rndr bag holding pajeet the whole time hahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.22182022]

Holy shit these render faggots just made me go all in RLC kek

[Anonymous No.22182039]

>>22181856
Step outside for a moment and take a deep breathe of fresh air. You've truly earned it.

[Anonymous No.22182253]

>>22181633
>huawei
>haiwu he
lmao

[Anonymous No.22182255]

>>22171964
AWS/Azure Object storage compatible?

[Anonymous No.22182285]

looks like the tweets have started to flow again for September...

So how high is the V5 pt2 pump going to go?

top 50 on CMC only sends RLC to around $3

[Anonymous No.22182308]

>>22182255
this is a question for the slack, and they will probably say "not yet but its on the roadmap" or something, but its a good question

[Anonymous No.22182480]

>>22182285
top 30- top 10 depending on the news

[Anonymous No.22182510]

>>22178516
>shut up
The absolute state of this pajeet

[Anonymous No.22182523]

>>22181983
Dont worry about me buddy, this shit thread just captivated my attention. I fully know that RNDR will beat the shit out of iExec.

[Anonymous No.22182562]

>>22171964
Hahahaha shut up about this shitcoin
That boomer had 20 years

[Anonymous No.22182570]

>>22180089
>We are coming for your MCAP and we are going to gobble it all up buddy, dont say you weren't warned.
Go back to the discord you were shilling yesterday, tranny

[Anonymous No.22182633]

>>22182480
that would require google/aws/ibm to retweet them

top 30 would definitely require coinbase to acknowledge them. US institutional investors would easily send this to $10

>>22182523
>20 posts
seek help 50 cent