CAN WE PLEASE ARBITRUM

[Anonymous No.22127425]

OK THANK YOU

[Anonymous No.22127585]

Vitalik is a piece of shit. He wrote 12 tweets making excuses why it's not eths fault. Demanding other to solve eths shitty tx output with off chain tx.

Off chain never works. This what's BTC has been preaching for 3 years and still LN network isn't mainstream and still ppl send on mainnet.

Eth needs to die and replaced with something proper. Maybe polkadot?

[Anonymous No.22128274]

>>22127585
You are obviously too fucking dumb to live
Arbitrum is exactly not off chain, it is on chain levels of trust with minimal chain footprint
Literally kys

[Anonymous No.22128701]

>>22127425
which defi projects will be moving to arbitrum? staking has to happen first, right? what does this mean for my linkies? Thanks

[Anonymous No.22128913]

>>22128701
>staking has to happen first right?
not at all. that was the thing with arbitrum. I'm paraphrasing but an early statement was essentially, "We're scaling eth regardless of how ETH 2 goes". ETH 2.0 is not required for arbitrum to work. it already works on testnets.

[Anonymous No.22128933]

>>22127425
No Arbitrum, no reputation, no staking, no mixicles, no threshold signatures, no TEEs, no fucking nothing.
You get absolutely fucking nothing.

[Anonymous No.22129429]

>>22128701
Why not move all of the link price aggregation first and print only encrypted price reference data to chain that the using/paying entity could decrypt?
Would disincentivize freeloaders and be a controlled use case for proof of concept
COME ON SERGER GET IN THE GAME

[Anonymous No.22129469]

>>22128913
Hes talking about link staking which should be part of arbitrum in that there need to be node penalties at least for non response.
And yes eth 2.0 is dying and arbitrum will be the final bullet in skellys pencil neck

[Anonymous No.22129515]

I drink your milkshake.

[Anonymous No.22129880]

>>22129515
Both the greatest producer and consumer of gas