Chainlink

[Anonymous No.21997444]

I'll just leave this here

[Anonymous No.21997468]

>>21997444
youre new around here arent you?

[Anonymous No.21997519]

>>21997444
You had two years

[Anonymous No.21997545]

>>21997519
*Three

[Anonymous No.21997553]

>>21997444
trips of truth
a new normal will be reached

[Anonymous No.21998369]

[Anonymous No.21998480]

>>21997519
You had 2 days to sell

>>21997444
Checked

[Anonymous No.21998491]

>>21997444
Linkies take FUD like this as a buy signal. Reality will only sink in once the bubble pops and they lose all their money

[Anonymous No.21998527]

>>21998480
People have been saying that ever since LINK hit like $1.20 and dropped to $0.80 again afterwards. How long will you keep coping?

>You had TWO WEEKS to sell above $4
>smugpepe.jpg

[Anonymous No.21998559]

>>21997444
Just loaded up on LINKDOWN on binance. Wish me luck boys.

[Anonymous No.21998563]

>>21998491
This is the same logic as a braindead XRP holder kek.
>just wait and see.............

[Anonymous No.21998564]

>>21998369
We’re “smart money”. If anything, we just passed “first sell off”. Chainlink tokens, unlike traditional stocks, have an actual utility. We’re dealing with a whole new asset class. Yes, speculation is happening but we have a long trek upwards ahead of us in the midterm.

[Anonymous No.21998579]

>>21997519

You had 2 years to sell and break even, trannie.

[Anonymous No.21998580]

[Anonymous No.21998597]

>>21997444
That's not the chart. You've had to massage it to remove the second bull trap/return to normal. The whales fucked up the painting this time around.

[Anonymous No.21998606]

>>21998563
>up >9000%
>Heh, linkies are just like XRP cucks... They will never win
We already won, noLinker.

[Anonymous No.21998643]

>>21998606
That's not what I was implying at all you shit sniffing braindead cunt. Reread the post.

[Anonymous No.21998647]

>>21997444
ftfy

[Anonymous No.21998670]

ah yes, the covid pandemic and global economic collapse was all part of the chainlink bear trap.

[Anonymous No.21998705]

>>21998647
Epic WIN.

>>21997444
Epic FAIL.

[Anonymous No.21998715]

[Anonymous No.21998718]

>>21998670
LINK fud is the root cause of COVID

[Anonymous No.21998815]

>>21997444
This could go down hard tomorrow, or it could still go 4x higher.
I got my long term stack but wouldn't gamble on this right now, too risky.

[Anonymous No.21998854]

>>21998563
Linkies are more like BitConnect suckers because they're in a cult and deluded. Chainlink is a piece of shit vaporware that does nothing and is worthles. I can't wait till you lose all your money. I will be laughing.

[Anonymous No.21998864]

>>21998579
>break even from 9000% return after 2 years
No one is this dumb right?

[Anonymous No.21999107]

I don't understand how people think this chart is sustainable, corrections are healthy for the long term

[Anonymous No.21999142]

>>21997444
This “market cycle” happened in 3 months OP

[Anonymous No.21999150]

>>21999107
>chart

[Anonymous No.21999188]

>>21998854
This. Connecting glorified rss feeds to the blockchain isn't revolutionary. Link couples the scalability issues of ETH with the double spend issues of BTC.

[Anonymous No.21999245]

>>21997444
Fixed your image

[Anonymous No.21999249]

>>21997444
the covid dump is an extraordinary circumstance and should not be used in your general trend analysis

[Anonymous No.21999252]

>>21999150

Yeah dawg chart, because the people with more than $500 to buy Link with are going to be the ones looking at this shit and already took profits at 20, the little guy will start soon

[Anonymous No.21999273]

>>21997444

[Anonymous No.21999308]

>>21997444
>all the assmad linkies ITT

[Anonymous No.21999345]

>>21998559
LINKDOWN up 3.48% since I wrote this. You guys can come on the ride with me if you want.

[Anonymous No.21999360]

the prophesy is true

[Anonymous No.21999389]

>>21997444
That scam shit token will die within a year.

[Anonymous No.21999421]

>>21999345
LINKDOWN is up 5.3% from my post.

[Anonymous No.21999460]

>>21999389
Link will be over 9000 next year.

[Anonymous No.21999490]

>>21999107
>people
not a ponzi, doesnt need retail investor shrimp to pump the price

[Anonymous No.21999513]

every

fucking

time

[Anonymous No.21999527]

>>21999460
9000 roped investors. You guys are ok, just don't want to see you die with the ship.

[Anonymous No.21999567]

>>21999421
LINKDOWN is now up 6% from my order.

[Anonymous No.21999583]

>>21997444
DELET
i'm not done dumping my ICO stack yet

[Anonymous No.21999628]

>>21999567
Stop shorting my precious linkies

[Anonymous No.21999653]

>>21999567
Nearly 7% up

[Anonymous No.21999664]

>>21999360

Yeah I'm getting December 2017 vibes again from people on here. People then thought things would just go up forever, euphoria is a real bitch.

[Anonymous No.21999669]

>>21998564
I don't see a possibility that we didn't just leave "bear trap," if we're even there yet

[Anonymous No.21999679]

>>21998369
Brainlet here. Can someone clarify, the “bull trap” label is always placed at the bottom of the dip after the peak. Am I right in thinking the bull trap is actually the slope up from this valley, rather than the bottom of that valley?

[Anonymous No.21999680]

>>21999567
>>21999628
Samefag

[Anonymous No.21999706]

>>21998491
Yeah that’s happened already to me. I’ll never sell you dirty pajeet.

[Anonymous No.21999707]

>>21999653
meh, dropped a bit, selling my position. Still this coin is trash and you will get dumped on. Easier to short this than to hold and less risky. 5% in 44 minutes.

[Anonymous No.21999709]

>>21999527
>die with the ship
Yes sirs thank you for concern sirs I will sell my link now sirs

[Anonymous No.21999718]

Keep believing Chainlink will crash if that is what will soothe your self hatred about missing the biggest pump in crypto history THAT WAS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU ALL ALONG

LMFAO

[Anonymous No.21999728]

>>21998580
unironically made this fucking chart happen and nolinkers are SEETHING

[Anonymous No.21999732]

>>21999680
bro, I was mocking linkies like you.

[Anonymous No.21999778]

>>21999679

Bull trap is the retrace after the peak that people buy back into or buy for the first time if they took profits at the peak or missed the rally.

Bull think that wasn't the peak despite a very overextended chart and think it's just gonna go up forever.

Example:

>>21999360
>>21999245
>>21997519
>>21997545
>>21998564
>>21998580

[Anonymous No.21999823]

>>21999718
Literally called a short in real time on ya. Only thing that was missing was a dab.

[Anonymous No.21999876]

>>21999460

[Anonymous No.21999890]

>>21999778
Rent free. LINK was shilled here since 10 cents. You could've made 200x yet you shit post 3 years later how it's a bubble. Cope harder and just accept you have shit investment intuition and you should just quit crypto or accept you have no better insight than a random Mumbai pajeet

[Anonymous No.21999938]

Using Corona as "First Sell Off"

Typical tricks schlomo

[Anonymous No.21999943]

>>21999890
LINK was one of many coins that I had from here. LINK and like 4 others did well, everything else is still shit. This is going to collapse like NEO did.

[Anonymous No.21999967]

>>21999876

[Anonymous No.21999983]

>>21999890

Motherfucker I bought in 2018. I love Link. But getting burned in 2017 to shit I thought would go up forever taught me a fucking lesson. You're all drunk on euphoria.

[Anonymous No.22000012]

>>21999983
The only thing LINK related that will moon will be the number of related suicides.

[Anonymous No.22000022]

>media attention not listed because Chainlink still doesn't get any
>market cycles play out in 5 months

lmfao

[Anonymous No.22000032]

>>21999823
>12 posts ITT
Rent free. It's not too late on missing out. Then again you'll make threads like this when LINK hits 100$ or 500$ and you'll never ever learn. There are winners and losers in this universe. Just accept your position and move on.

[Anonymous No.22000058]

>>21998369
except there is almost no public knowledge of LINK, let alone media attention. literally just check google trends or ask anyone you know to confirm this. we are unironically in first sell-off at worst, and probably still smart money/take off.

[Anonymous No.22000094]

My TA says otherwise

[Anonymous No.22000109]

>>22000058
>4th highest market cap on CMC
>no media attention, no publiic knowledge
You're dumb.

[Anonymous No.22000167]

>>22000058

A week ago a friend that has no idea what a blockchain even does asked me what this thing called Chainlink he heard about was that could turn him into a millionaire.

[Anonymous No.22000185]

>>22000032
>Then again you'll make threads like this when LINK hits 100$ or 500$
Linkies unironically think it will have a 175,000,000,000 market cap.

[Anonymous No.22000216]

>>22000167
wuts uh paradiggem

[Anonymous No.22000242]

>>22000185
Yes.

[Anonymous No.22000255]

>>22000185
When it gets to that market cap it will have officially hit the "take off" phase. But not a single penny before that

[Anonymous No.22000281]

>>22000058

Reminds me in january 2018 when people were saying smart money wasn't yet in Bitcoin.

How the fuck do you people think we got to the #5 spot in all of Crypto? You think this was funded by 13 biztards?

[Anonymous No.22000350]

>>22999999
>>22000000

[Anonymous No.22000406]

[Anonymous No.22000425]

>>22000406
YOU ARE A MANIAC

[Anonymous No.22000434]

>>22000255
Explain to me why you think it's worth 4x as much as ETH. Please.

[Anonymous No.22000467]

>>22000406

Oh look I can do the same to BTC, you can barely notice it went from pennies 20k to 3k

[Anonymous No.22000486]

how do i set up a short on binace?

[Anonymous No.22000507]

>>22000467
Bitcoin is in the "smart money" phase! Look! BAKA.

[Anonymous No.22000532]

>>22000467

Thanks for making my point for me. Novel products take 3 decades to hit the mainstream. We're early.

[Anonymous No.22000539]

>>22000486
Easiest way is to buy LINKDOWN on the ETF tab. It's leveraged so if you're wrong it's gonna hurt.

[Anonymous No.22000638]

>>22000532

Overall, probably we are. But we ain't going up forever Steven. Why don't people realize doing a pullback is good and healthy? ETH did it, BTC did it.

[Anonymous No.22000671]

>>22000638
I don't care if we pull back in the short-term, in fact I welcome it because it puts it behind us sooner. Long-term is where we're headed.

[Anonymous No.22000683]

>>22000638
Because they are delusional, almost as bad a "the billion coin" investors.

[Anonymous No.22000697]

>>21998715

this man speaks the truth

[Anonymous No.22000848]

>>21999664
I don't know how you feel that, I don't feel euphoria at all, I feel extreme fear that we're going to dump. Everywhere I look I see that fear, specially everyone who lived through 2018 and later saw link's $4 top after Coinbase listing. I see traders from the outside stepping in constantly to build short positions against LINK desu..

I have to restrain myself from selling my full stack at all times. Not saying any of that is evidence of the contrary, but I don't see how anyone can call the current vibe euphoria... Aside from the retarded telegram groups but those are just pajeets thinking that pretending to be optimistic will drive price

[Anonymous No.22000849]

>>22000638
didn't ETH go from like $10 to $1000 within a year, where was the "healthy" correction there?

[Anonymous No.22000855]

>>22000697
You wouldn't listen.

[Anonymous No.22000892]

>>22000849
And what happened? If I remember correctly the majority of that growth happened over 3 months.

[Anonymous No.22000935]

>>22000697
>t. delusion

[Anonymous No.22000945]

>>22000892
if LINK mooned from $10 to even "just" $100 it wouldn't need a healthy correction if you look at ETH's growth. There was no correction taking place except for small short dips. It literally x100ed in 1 year with no lengthy corrections.

[Anonymous No.22000959]

>>21997444
Post proof of short position, faggot.

[Anonymous No.22000962]

>>22000185
That's not crazy if we get an insane bubble phase like XRP got. It reached around that cap iirc.

[Anonymous No.22001022]

>>22000849

Let's see:

1. when it hit $1.50 it crashed to 0.40c
2. from $21 to $5.6
( (we may be here) )
3. from $97 to $25
4. from $400 to $130
5. from $1,591 to $78 dollars
5.

[Anonymous No.22001082]

>>22000849

Let's see:

1. when it hit $1.50 it crashed to 0.40c
2. from $21 to $5.6
( (we may be here) )
3. from $97 to $25
4. from $400 to $130
5. from $1,591 to $78 dollars

[Anonymous No.22001090]

>>22001022
I'd consider a healthy correction something that lasts at least a few months if not a year (or longer). How many of those fit that timeline?

[Anonymous No.22001097]

>>22000945
ETH has plenty of major dips, its just they happened very.quickly during its rise.

Novices looking at charts now can't think outside time horizons so they don't see how there was significant profit taking all along the way with ETHs rise, but on a daily and weekly chart it just looks parabolic (which it is,but it still behaves perfectly logical in relation to its time frames)

[Anonymous No.22001105]

>>22001022
>22000999

[Anonymous No.22001137]

>>22001082
my point is ETH only needed 1 year to go from $10 to 1k. No healthy protracted correction occurred in that timeframe. If LINK is in the similar timeline, it would be ridiculous to expect a healthy correction, it could dip to $5 and then be $50 a month later. I wouldn't look to time that. It only makes sense to speak of healthy corrections if you believe we are now truly at the top of a LINK cycle where one could reasonably expect at least half a year of lower prices.

[Anonymous No.22001147]

>>22000849
Bobos are retarded. They think growth that exceeds 1% per month is an unnatural bubble while prices crashing 50% in a day and crabbing for a year after that is perfectly healthy and normal.

[Anonymous No.22001180]

>>22001097
Of course. But if you are in a parabolic phase, it doesn't make sense to try to time a healthy correction when it could x10 a month later. I don't know how anyone would try to time those dips, you could easily price yourself out waiting for a dip that doesn't happen when just holding would be the better strategy.

[Anonymous No.22001217]

>>22001180
On the other hand if you think LINK is in a cycle top, where one could expect a longer healthy correction to occur, like ETH at 1k, then of course it's smart to sell it now and buy it back later (if you are still a bull long term). But if we are starting a parabolic phase similar to ETH's run-up from $10 to $100, I don't see the reason to take up this risk and try to time the dips on a parabolic moonshot.

[Anonymous No.22001251]

>>22001217
>ETH's run-up from $10 to $100,

*to $1000

[Anonymous No.22001276]

Zoom out.

[Anonymous No.22001412]

>>22001180

I completely agree with you there, but you also have to look at the timelines. People want to draw the same ETH and LINK comparison, but have they taken into account that 2017 was a roaring bull run, not in a time of crisis with a pandemic, not with economies in shambles around the globe, not with an election year?

Here's the chart for past occurrences:

[Anonymous No.22001438]

>>21997444
Screen cap your short

[Anonymous No.22001520]

I raise you this OP.

[Anonymous No.22001585]

>>22001520

>what is marketcap

[Anonymous No.22001683]

>>22001412
Biggest difference from 2017 to now is the proliferation of coins/tokens. It's difficult to imagine any coin exploding the way ETH did nowadays because the money in crpyto is so much more spread out now.

[Anonymous No.22001749]

>>22000406
>Ecstasy of Gold
PEAK COMFY.

[Anonymous No.22001777]

>>22001585
Not selling

[Anonymous No.22001792]

>>22001520
It matches you retard.

[Anonymous No.22001838]

>>22001683

This is actually a very good point, I'll add that to my arguments.

[Anonymous No.22001845]

>>21997519

[Anonymous No.22002178]

>>22001585
>>22001683
These. It's alread the 4th highest token... yet doesn't appear to solve any problem beyond adding glorified RSS feeds.

[Anonymous No.22002431]

>>22001749
this thread is now blessed by the definition of based.

[Anonymous No.22002639]

>>22002178
did u not read deca and miracles and the data privacy capabilities that chainlink is creating?

[Anonymous No.22002754]

>>22002178

I mean I don't really care about those bits because the market can be irrational and just make vaporware fly.

But LINK at even $100 implies a 35 trillion marketcap. I mean LMAO

[Anonymous No.22002817]

>>21999778
But what fools those bulls is the dead cat bounce, i.e. bulls are trapped in the upwards slope of the dead cat bounce, right?

[Anonymous No.22002832]

>>22002754
You've got 3 extra 0s.

[Anonymous No.22002910]

>>21999513
this is the perfect meme. no words. beautiful. smug

[Anonymous No.22002955]

>>21999778
you are assuming link is just a PnD shitcoin that has no use case. you will soon realize how mistaken you are

[Anonymous No.22002963]

>>22002817

Well, yes, the ones whose buys creates that bounce up. They're trapped if they don't sell if it turns on them

[Anonymous No.22002994]

>>22000406
based + link pilled

[Anonymous No.22003001]

>>22002955

You're assuming ETH and BTC were pump n dump shitcoins with no use cases then because that's exactly what they all did.

[Anonymous No.22003059]

>>22003001
no i'm not. i think you're retarded and don't know what you're talking about :/

[Anonymous No.22003109]

>>22000185
Lol no. A lot higher.

[Anonymous No.22003136]

>>21997444
you could literally be a time traveler and tell us that we retrace from here and there would still be people here saying you're coping and that you had 3 years

[Anonymous No.22003239]

>>22000434
Because Chainlink forms a critical and difficult piece of infrastructure for the future of automated and decentralized finance, developed by a serious, talented and dedicated team of software engineers and computer scientists. Ethereum is a half-assed script host bolted on top of a second rate bitcoin ripoff, written by a narcissist commie hacker with dunning kruger symptoms. If anything deserves to be mocked as little more than a glorified json parser, it’s eth.
Eth 2.0? Vitalik doesn’t have the skill to write it, and he knows it.

[Anonymous No.22003341]

>>22002178
its THE highest token

[Anonymous No.22003418]

>>21999567
looks like its doing a double bottom.

[Anonymous No.22003474]

>>22003418
already sold @3.04.

[Anonymous No.22003475]

>>22003239
Ethereum is half assed, yet Chainlink was built on it. If Link was so innovative, why didn't it launch with it's own software client? 3 years you fuckers say? Where's the staking? There was no working oracle product when the ICO launched. 35% of the tokens or more Sergey held onto. Bullshit they don't care about the price because they need their network to be operational and valuable. Ergo is less of a scam. Take a look at that coin.

Speculation gives value to these shit coins. The story doesn't change because of DeFi. Same manipulated bullshit market. just play cards and make some money on these useless coins. Bitcoin is still king although it sucks how it works now. 7 tps is like using an atari in 2020.

[Anonymous No.22003513]

numbers

[Anonymous No.22003863]

>>21998564
This guy gets it

[Anonymous No.22003867]

>>22003475
This. Couple that with the dumping Sergy has done recently to buy shitty products that his friends worked on.
I'm not saying it's a scam, just that it's junk with a poorly defined usecase. Want a token for IoT? IOTA, VET, WTC all are better suited for the task.
Want to have a good median of exchange? XRP is far better suited and Flare will even have smart contracts.

Both these uses don't require a high value token... so why does it have any value? With Defi and staking, LINK is again moving into territory where it wouldn't be the most ideal solution.

[Anonymous No.22003922]

>>22003475
>If Link was so innovative, why didn't it launch with it's own software client
The Oracle problem is big enough to focus on. Yet it seems they agree with you if Offchain Labs’ Arbitrum is any indication. And when a competent smart contract settlement layer emerges, Chainlink is ready to integrate.

[Anonymous No.22003958]

So, you're telling me there will be a new take off?

[Anonymous No.22004084]

>>22003958
1k and beyond
>No need for a stinky graph, just check'em

[Anonymous No.22004427]

>>22003136
The time traveler came to tell us about $81K linkies.