/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.21883735]

We are through the looking glass here, people.

[Anonymous No.21883773]

>MS Word integration
>keeps on dumping

[Anonymous No.21883789]

>>21883773
totally not manipulated, goys

[Anonymous No.21883795]

>>21883735
Have we heard details of this yet?

[Anonymous No.21883828]

>>21883773
I remember same type of posts when bsn article came out.

>partners with china
>dumps to $4

[Anonymous No.21883856]

>>21883773
link always dumps on good news anon, where have you been?

[Anonymous No.21884008]

>>21883735
This is a custom plugin, anybody can make one.
>>21883828
What? We flew to $5 in a 15 minute green dildo like half an hour after Chainlink tweeted the BSN announcement.

[Anonymous No.21884147]

>>21884008
>This is a custom plugin, anybody can make one.
And?

>We flew to $5 in a 15 minute green dildo like half an hour after Chainlink tweeted the BSN announcement.
That was the BSN confirmation.
He's talking about the first rumors.

Link dumped the first couple of times this BSN/Chainlink connection was brought up.
Pic related.

[Anonymous No.21884151]

>>21883735
This is bullish.

[Anonymous No.21884162]

Cool maybe now I can pay $7 in fees to fetch the price of ETH instead of connecting to the coinmarketcap api

[Anonymous No.21884229]

>>21884162
>fetch the price of ETH instead of connecting to the coinmarketcap api

How do you not know what an oracle even is?

[Anonymous No.21884289]

>>21883828
This. We're ahead of the curve it takes awhile for the market to respond. This is the power of years of disinformation. We did it discord!

[Anonymous No.21884340]

its a custom plug in extension. No one will use this. It meas nothing.

[Anonymous No.21884384]

Times new Roman is about to fucking pump!!! We’re so early bro’s

[Anonymous No.21884415]

>>21883735
It will be used in flight simulator too, the azure peeps are on it bruv.

[Anonymous No.21884530]

>>21884340
>its a custom plug in extension.
And?

This is exactly what Docusign is working on as well: drag and drop convenience.
That's what smart contracts are all about.

[Anonymous No.21884588]

>>21884384
Someone will make scamcoins from this meme and send them to Sergey
>>21884530
Faggots here think redesigning the wheel is necessary otherwise it's not bullish. They sound that methheads living in a bubble

[Anonymous No.21884726]

[Anonymous No.21884745]

Fk

[Anonymous No.21884761]

See see pee

[Anonymous No.21884781]

[Anonymous No.21884805]

>>21884761
psyop

https://youtu.be/2LtT3sfbSXs
https://youtu.be/1-_IRbu1gAo
https://youtu.be/8MsMuQa80fI
https://youtu.be/Hopd-gKB1Xc
https://youtu.be/-2yYgfaU6Ik
https://youtu.be/r0plv_nIzsQ
https://youtu.be/rbRVnC92sMs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGWSX6pStd0
https://youtu.be/Xm2mlNL054A
https://youtu.be/WffR6HrEqTA
https://youtu.be/OLUZMXuCAxY

https://youtu.be/e4hiSgiGloo
https://youtu.be/72DA4fgamPE
https://youtu.be/5K_4b-I1snM
https://youtu.be/Xm_6Gi4Jqbg

[Anonymous No.21884813]

>>21884781

[Anonymous No.21884834]

[Anonymous No.21884841]

>>21883735
Priced in

[Anonymous No.21884878]

token is literally not needed for this though
what do you think people ned to buy link to use word?
fucking dumb ass

[Anonymous No.21884901]

>>21884878
You retard how do you still now know what the whitepaper says

[Anonymous No.21885091]

>>21884761
Do you have all images in the series?

[Anonymous No.21885268]

>>21885091
>>/biz/thread/13485416

[Anonymous No.21885332]

>>21884530
Was gonna ask that. Do you think this is actually the same thing? Openlaw+Docusign collab on this?

[Anonymous No.21886085]

>>21885332
>Do you think this is actually the same thing? Openlaw+Docusign collab on this?
It's possible, they're two extremely related projects.

[Anonymous No.21886125]

Replaced by flare in a year.

[Anonymous No.21886196]

>>21883735
Is he saying you can do a shortcut formula like
>LINKBTC
or
>LINKUSD

and include the changing live variable from data feeds in your contract?

[Anonymous No.21886216]

>>21886196
Would make the most sense. Guess we'll see what it is about this weekend.

[Anonymous No.21886217]

>>21883735
never thought i'd make it via excel

[Anonymous No.21886298]

confused as to why this matters, couldnt you just make an api call directly to the service from excel instead of going through link? Excel runs locally, you don't need chainlink to interface with APIs

[Anonymous No.21886310]

>>21886217
They called me incel

[Anonymous No.21886331]

>>21886298
It sounds like an ease of use thing for normies, plus MS will also have an interest in getting exposure to the new tech

[Anonymous No.21886367]

>mfw link will be intgrtd into mineswiper and pinball

[Anonymous No.21886384]

>>21886298
yes you can lol. i do it all over my google spreadsheets, where i track my investments. it's easy as fuck. holy shit, if people figure out what he's saying here will be the main use for link, it's over. good thing normies are retarded and wont understand that this basically means link is useless.

[Anonymous No.21886397]

>>21886331
why would normies choose to, say, go through link to get Bitcoin and Gold price data when they could just directly hit price feed APIs though? Link is useful for trustless decentralized networks/databases, but excel is entirely local/centralized.

[Anonymous No.21886415]

>>21886298
It's to support both smart contracts and all blockchain so technically you could yeah but it's a step towards web 3.0 / decentralization

[Anonymous No.21886417]

>>21886310
Now you excel

[Anonymous No.21886420]

>>21886384
>basically means link is useless
quiet child, adults are talking

[Anonymous No.21886428]

>>21886298
Read: oracle problem

[Anonymous No.21886436]

>>21886397
They probably wouldnt, but if it pops up in an update it gets the attention of some managers trying to streamline things, mainly about exposure

[Anonymous No.21886448]

>>21886384
Is your spreadsheet contract binding?

[Anonymous No.21886451]

>>21883856
just stating the obvious

[Anonymous No.21886519]

>>21886298
Why should I trust your data in Excel?

[Anonymous No.21886530]

>>21886428
oracle problem is for decentralized systems. With a centralized app like excel (running locally) you can just make direct API calls. You don't have to worry about trusting the "oracle" because in this case the oracle and the app communicating with the oracle are both just the same excel install.

[Anonymous No.21886560]

>>21886519
If you're running the excel spreadsheet you should run it because you're the "oracle". You're actively making the API call. If you're looking at some output generated from an excel spreadsheet then you shouldn't use it whether or not I claim I used link feeds to generate it.

[Anonymous No.21886583]

>>21886560
*you should trust it because

[Anonymous No.21886603]

>>21886560
>then you shouldn't use it
*then you shouldn't trust it

god damn I cant type tonight

[Anonymous No.21886618]

>>21886530
Unless you're someone writing an important document whose career and reputation relies on concrete data, and not just some schoolkid writing about their favourite internet coin.
It depends on the job. It's just crap fud to claim this development means nothing. It's another feather in the cap of Chainlink, whether you like it or not.

[Anonymous No.21886639]

>>21883773
>Dumping
>7x year to date.

[Anonymous No.21886642]

>>21883735
>tfw ai has to pay humans to exist

[Anonymous No.21886664]

>>21886298
>what are smart contracts
>what are oracles

Boy you don't even know the first thing about any of this.

[Anonymous No.21886688]

>>21886560
I dunno I think some documents will include thousands of inputs. Cheaper to use link in many situations than pay someone to manually audit inputs

[Anonymous No.21886752]

>>21886196
>>21886216

No.
That will also be possible, but this is about writing smart contracts and smart clauses in things like Word.
In other words: MS Office (Word, Excel, ...) becomes the UI for smart contracts (that can use external data).

See >>21884530

[Anonymous No.21886827]

>>21886448
this lmao

Amazing how nobody on here seems to know what smart contracts even are.

[Anonymous No.21886932]

>>21884008
No we did not you fucking retard kek. Fudders are literally rewriting history.

[Anonymous No.21887087]

>>21886618
>Unless you're someone writing an important document whose career and reputation relies on concrete data

Doesn't matter whether you're getting it through an API fed through link or you're getting it directly from the API.

>>21886664
>i think smart contracts run on excel

>>21886688
Still need to audit those inputs, since the oracles you're using will be using those inputs. It just kicks the can down the road.

>>21886752
So this is for feeding data *into* blockchains? Couldn't you just use something that just directly signs a transaction to the chain in question instead of using link as the middle man? Like myetherwallet?

[Anonymous No.21887125]

>>21887087
>>i think smart contracts run on excel
No, excel would be the UI for the smart contract.

That's what this thread is about.

You said "you don't need chainlink to interface with APIs", meaning you have no idea what oracles do, and therefore no idea what smart contracts are.

>So this is for feeding data *into* blockchains?
Yes. That is what oracles are.

>Couldn't you just use something that just directly signs a transaction to the chain in question
That would be an oracle.

[Anonymous No.21887209]

>>21887125
I understand what oracles are, and also, I understand that you would be acting as an "oracle" if you use excel to interact directly with a bockchain. My question is, why do you need a decentralized oracle solution for excel spreadsheets? The app running the spreadsheet (smart contract UI) is also the app connecting to the blockchain. This is like making metamask route through link to sign transactions to ethereum. Just do it directly, like metamask does.

[Anonymous No.21887218]

>>21887087
>Like myetherwallet?
Myetherwallet doesn't need an oracle because it only uses ETH-based data.
Chainlink is for feeding external data on-chain.

Weather data, flight data, package delivery data, rideshare completion data, ...
The project in OP means you can basically type a clause saying "30% refund if airplane does not depart on time", and it would be automatically enforced.

[Anonymous No.21887246]

>>21887209
>My question is, why do you need a decentralized oracle solution for excel spreadsheets?
To enforce smart contracts that are written up in Excel, Word, ... and that require external data.

You are absolutely clueless.

[Anonymous No.21887274]

>>21887218
>>21887246

>you can basically type a clause saying "30% refund if airplane does not depart on time", and it would be automatically enforced.
>To enforce smart contracts that are written up in Excel, Word, ... and that require external data.

that would have nothing to do with link integration in excel. You could just sign a transaction to a smart contract, and that smart contract would pull in data through link oracles.

[Anonymous No.21887294]

>>21887274
>that would have nothing to do with link integration in excel.
What?

You write up a contract in Word/Excel, and Chainlink provides the external data which the blockchain back-end needs to trigger the smart contract.

>You could just sign a transaction to a smart contract
That would be an oracle.

[Anonymous No.21887372]

>>21887294
link provides external data to a smart contract running on a blockchain. It doesn't (or at least its purpose isnt to) provide data to local apps like excel. If you write a smart contract in excel, you can just leverage link in the contract. At no point does excel need to interact with link.

>That would be an oracle.
Yeah, and if the app you're getting data from is the same one that's publishing that data to the blockchain then there is absolutely 0 disadvantage to using a centralized "oracle", like a wallet.

[Anonymous No.21887397]

>>21887372
>link provides external data to a smart contract running on a blockchain.
Yes.

>It doesn't (or at least its purpose isnt to) provide data to local apps like excel.
What the fuck are you talking about?

The whole point of the project in OP is to have Chainlink provide data for smart contracts written in Word or Excel.

[Anonymous No.21887458]

>>21887397
>The whole point of the project in OP is to have Chainlink provide data for smart contracts written in Word or Excel.
It doesn't matter what the contract is written in. Just write it to interact with the chainlink contracts. Link doesnt need to be aware of what you're writing your contracts in.

[Anonymous No.21887470]

>>21887372
>if the app you're getting data from is the same one that's publishing that data to the blockchain then there is absolutely 0 disadvantage to using a centralized "oracle"

1) yes there are disadvantages: spotty uptime, single point of attack or failure, non-competitive pricing, etc.

2) all this would do is allow end users to verify on-chain who the source was. It does not obviate the need for Chainlink.
See pic for instance.
Coinbase launched "open oracle", whereby Coinbase signed their own data, and then Coinbase themselves explain how this HELPS Chainlink become more secure.

[Anonymous No.21887496]

>>21887458
>It doesn't matter what the contract is written in.
Not really, no.
But being able to write smart contracts in fucking Word is obviously a huge benefit.

>Link doesnt need to be aware of what you're writing your contracts in.
No, it just needs to provide the external data the smart contract back-end needs.

[Anonymous No.21887499]

>>21887470
do you ever get bored of spending 12 hours a day on biz posting about chainlink? not trying to fud or whatever but just genuinely curious

[Anonymous No.21887506]

>>21887499
Seething.

[Anonymous No.21887517]

>>21883735
>Smart contracts and link is now at the fingertips of the 1 billion office users globably

literally IOTA china hustle tier pumping talk
guess what retard half of the worlds population is theoreticaly fingertips away from going on binance.com and buying your ERC20 token - guess what they dont

[Anonymous No.21887528]

>>21887499
some anons are generous enough to spoon feed you
you should be thankful

[Anonymous No.21887537]

>>21887517
Well it's literally true.

[Anonymous No.21887548]

I think what everyone is missing is how this applies to internal workings of corporations. Entire departments are made redundant. This is how overhead is reduced. Finance departments and legal teams are expensive, inefficient, and plagued with bloat. Even when trying to lean up a company demands can come and go in an unpredictable fashion. What the excel integration is come down to agility and nimbleness. It would be more appropriate to say that it replaces the fingertips of [part] of the 1 billion office users globally. It's industrial revolution vs seamstresses bout 2.

[Anonymous No.21887567]

>>21887506
I'm not seething. I hold link myself but I just wonder how you can be content spending all your time on biz shilling link. You are in almost every thread debating the fundamentals and technicals.

>>21887528
I dont need to be spoon fed. 3 years

[Anonymous No.21887592]

>>21887537
it means nothing
the same way a dumb app for your crypto coin approved by the Apple App Store means nothing

[Anonymous No.21887637]

>>21887470
>spotty uptime

If your uptime from where you're running the excel spreadsheet to sign the transaction to publish the contract is spotty, then your uptime to speak to the link network is also spotty

>single point of attack or failure

See above, the same applies

>>21887496
>But being able to write smart contracts in fucking Word is obviously a huge benefit.
What does that have to do with link other than "you can write smart contracts". Any platform that can publish smart contracts to transactions can have those contracts interact with link, because any smart contract can interact with link.

[Anonymous No.21887738]

>>21883773
> MS plugin by a small hipster law team
> "OMG WOW WHY ISN'T THERE PUMP?"

[Anonymous No.21888334]

>>21887567
Based anon

[Anonymous No.21888447]

>>21887567
>I hold link myself but I just wonder how you can be content spending all your time on biz shilling link.
Makes a whole lot more sense than the resident fudders on here.
At least I'm talking about something I actually believe in.

>>21887592
>MS Word becoming a UI for smart contracts
>"it means nothing"
yeah, is that why Docusign is working on something similar?

[Anonymous No.21888504]

>>21887637
>If your uptime from where you're running the excel spreadsheet to sign the transaction to publish the contract is spotty, then your uptime to speak to the link network is also spotty
>See above, the same applies

lmao no

- a single oracle => any time it goes down, fails, is compromized, ... then the ENTIRE system is inoperational.

- multiple oracles => any time one goes down, fails, is compromized, ... there are a variety of other oracles to keep the system operational.

>What does that have to do with link other than "you can write smart contracts".
It means it becomes easier to create/use smart contracts that rely on Chainlink.

You're not just clueless, you're also pretty dim.

[Anonymous No.21888544]

>>21888447
Excited for the future when people refer to Chainlink as "link it" like a hyperlink or google it etc. Imagine live data streaming into contracts and text documents for literally everything. No more sitting down with boomer paper. This is a paperless contract age.

[Anonymous No.21888553]

>>21886298
based. Excel already does everything link is planning to do

[Anonymous No.21888577]

>>21888553
Does Excel place external data on-chain?

[Anonymous No.21888579]

>>21888553
Not random

[Anonymous No.21888611]

>>21888553
Also, that "randomness" is not verifiable.

[Anonymous No.21888700]

What user actually asked for this? It's at the fingertips of 1 billion office users. Who is actually going to install it though?

Have any of you linkies actually spent LINK? Or are you just holding in the hopes that someone someday will need it?

[Anonymous No.21888777]

>>21888700

What user asked for plug and play smart contracts on a software literally anyone remotely involved with business has been using for decades?

Idk you tell me?

[Anonymous No.21888822]

>>21888777
Literally no one?

[Anonymous No.21888884]

>>21888777
Checked. Normies don't ask for things they get convinced to use things through auto updates

[Anonymous No.21888905]

>>21888822

Did anyone ask for the Atomic Bomb? Airplanes? Penicillin? Radio? Gun Powder?

How much of a midwit are you, honestly.

[Anonymous No.21888974]

>>21888822
Microsoft loves money, and sees the value of LINK early on for their business partners.

I can't tell if people on here are trolling or retarded

[Anonymous No.21888979]

Why would MS Word require a price feed?

[Anonymous No.21889118]

>>21888979
>Why would MS Word require a price feed?

[Anonymous No.21889174]

>>21888974

The average person, even here, is a drone incapable of critical thinking almost entirely, much less asking them to extrapolate from given (limited) information.

Most of the FUD is from people who know passing the time, shit like this is honest ignorance though.

When Marconi began working with general radio broadcast transmissions, midwits suggested “but who would want to hear a transmission for no one in particular??”

Disregard these people almost entirely, except for a general sense of the common psyche at any given time.

[Anonymous No.21889234]

>>21888979
WhY woULD WoRD nEeD Price Feed?

[Anonymous No.21889271]

>>21889234
>>21889118
Kek

[Anonymous No.21889363]

>>21888577
>>21888579
>>21888611
fucking retards

[Anonymous No.21889653]

>>21887517
The truth no one wants to hear, and I own a good amount of LINK. We cant even have real discussions without shills sperging out about ”fud” as if some posts on a mongolian basket weaving forum will affect a token with $1 billion daily trading volume

[Anonymous No.21889759]

I just integrated Twitter into Word
giv money

[Anonymous No.21889786]

>>21886618
Of course it means nothing. In the end you have to ask yourself if anyone would pay pre inflated tokens for on chain queries to run simple shit like that. No smart contract needed, simple as that. A normal interface / program can perform all tasks that would be applicable for a simple smart contract (and complex smart contracts won't exist as they require thorough negotiation and clearing between the parties upfront)

[Anonymous No.21889806]

>>21889759
You just created a Twitter + Microsoft partnership
I hope either of them pay you for your work

[Anonymous No.21889812]

pls spoonfeed the "retard" whats this thread about link?

[Anonymous No.21889826]

>>21889118
>>21889234
Well, why would it?

[Anonymous No.21889858]

>>21889653
I just hate the term “FUD” so much. Its the typed equivalent of plugging your ears and going “la-la-la-la” as someone gives you legitimate criticism about your shitty token. Its a phrase that belongs in pajeet telegram groups and reddit, not /biz/.

[Anonymous No.21889871]

>>21889759
Are you a wizard?

[Anonymous No.21889934]

>>21887592
>>21887517
>>21886298
>>21884878
>>21888700
>as soon as cars were invented, everyone owned one the next day
>because most people don't understand how cars work they will never own one
These are actually the most common arguments I see against smartcontract/blockchain tech in general. Pretty shit desu. Don't get me wrong there are some valid questions brought up in this thread but a lot of this FUD is ultra-low-tier.

[Anonymous No.21889983]

>>21889934
> Owning cars
> No chance of rimming horses
Jonny btfo

[Anonymous No.21890020]

Decentralised oracles are useless when they all pull data from a single centralised feed

>This kills the fat Russian scammer

[Anonymous No.21890036]

>>21883735
>Does a revolutionary integration for his own project
>Shills his friend's shitcoin that has nothing to do with it (nobody using OpenLaw on Word is going to directly interact with $link)

Hello, yes SEC, I would like to report insider trading.

[Anonymous No.21890054]

>>21890020
> Believing a fat Russian scammer would be satisfied with just one data feed
Sergey isn't a just one kinda guy

[Anonymous No.21890248]

Could smart contract be used to agree consent before banging a woman (hard) or would the court not take it as proof of concent as she could have been coerced and would the nodes lose their stake in that case

[Anonymous No.21890320]

>>21890248
Ari Juels argues "smart contract consent is real consent" (2020, 42)

[Anonymous No.21890341]

>>21883735
There is literally zero infrastructure for this tech. You can come out with an extension for MS Word and nobody will use it (guarantee the download stats stay below 1000).

How close do you really think you are to blockchain based contracts? This tech is at least 20 years away. You can’t even scale blockchain exchanges yet.

[Anonymous No.21890435]

This is literally a nothingburger. Nobody cares and there is no partnership.

[Anonymous No.21890512]

>>21884726
i grew up in a place that gradually became more and more like this
it's every last bit as bad as it sounds
either that anon was raised by drug addicts/sociopaths who made him hate himself, or he was a drug addicts himself (but i'm guessing it was the former given that he seemed aware of his surroundings, cared, but felt helpless to change anything)

[Anonymous No.21890519]

>>21890341
Personally am sure we are less than 5 years away. My guess is in 20 anything that can be in a smart contract will be, and if LINK still exists it’ll be worth tens of thousands per token.

You have to realize they don’t just build these things because the think it’s useful, large clients are asking them to be built.

[Anonymous No.21890558]

>>21883735
Marines... HODL!

[Anonymous No.21890622]

you are brainlets. that is nothing. they make useless features, addons and plugins to keep you faggot on track. fuck link.

[Anonymous No.21890746]

>>21890036
It is pretty weird huh

[Anonymous No.21890780]

>>21883773
If I used ms word with chainlink, how in the fuck would it increase the price of the link token? I don't pay to use ms word you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.21890791]

>>21890519
They actually aren’t asking them to be built. People in the blockchain investment world seem really REALLY gullible to anything involving muh major corps.

These people just market “partnerships” that don’t exist. What’s the point of saying lol billions of fingertips!! When in reality maybe 150 people will download this extension.

Don’t you see when you’re being bullshitted? It’s really weird watching people get scammed in real time. Again, no infrastructure exists for this tech whatsoever, there are numerous business and legal hurdles to overcome even if the tech is possible.

And these 20 year olds on /biz/ act like it’s essentially finished. You’re going to be bagholding for a long long time unless you bought at sub $4. There is other blockchain tech out there about to be implemented on a world scale this year.

[Anonymous No.21890915]

>>21884147
>BSN
Fucking kek, you guys really are retarded.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/chinas-consortium-chains-may-not-be-trusted-internationally-says-vitalik-buterin

[Anonymous No.21890968]

>>21890791
>be me, product manager for smart contract adoption at a large company
>listen to you about any of these things
Uh huh. You actually now appear retarded to me.

[Anonymous No.21890971]

>>21890341
>How close do you really think you are to blockchain based contracts? This tech is at least 20 years away.
lmao, all it takes is external connectivity.
This is literally what Chainlink is doing.

Welcome to crypto since today, gramps.

>>21890036
>Shills his friend's shitcoin that has nothing to do with it
>nobody using OpenLaw on Word is going to directly interact with $link
There are no normie smart contracts without external connectivity, and Chainlink is by far the furthest ahead in this regard.
OpenLaw knows this very well, which is why they rep Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.21890983]

>>21889653
>>21889858
Get a load of Nancy over here crying on her own shoulder.

[Anonymous No.21891021]

>>21888777
Holy checked and based.

>>21890622
>MS Word is turned into a UI for Chainlink
>"that is nothing"
lel k bro

[Anonymous No.21891071]

>>21890780
>If I used ms word with chainlink, how in the fuck would it increase the price of the link token?
Every use of Chainlink involves the Link token. Ask T-Systems (Deutsche Telekom). Pic related.

This increases demand, thus increasing the price.

[Anonymous No.21891079]

>>21890915
I’m guessing you didn’t actually read that “article”

[Anonymous No.21891084]

>>21890341
>How close do you really think you are to blockchain based contracts?
What the fuck do you think AAVE runs on

[Anonymous No.21891100]

>>21890968
Did you automate a vending machine this quarter?

Good job! All business transactions are RIGHT around the corner!!!

This shit is exactly like the hype around ETH 2016. Vastly underestimating the time to build shit because it’s all children investing who literally don’t understand how complex the business world is.

But thats not going to stop you from memeing your way into the top 5 so congrats on that, seriously.

But it’s still years and years and years away. Enjoy the lawsuits too.

[Anonymous No.21891170]

>>21891100
>>21890791
>>21890341
Nice spacing, sperg.

[Anonymous No.21891582]

>>21891100
Kek look at this faggots cope
>i-it wont' happen right away
this is the current state of fud
hey faggot i'd tell you to buy my $13+ bags (and you would because you're a retard who needs to be told what to do) but I'M NOT SELLING A SINGLE LINKIE BELOW $1K

[Anonymous No.21891698]

>>21891582
I've gotta thank you guys for making me tons of money but you sure are massive faggots

>MY LINKIES STAY STINKY LOL!

Fucking manchildren. Ironic that you make fun of reddit for watching Marvel movies and shit while you do baby talk. No problem I'm sure you only do it ironically

[Anonymous No.21891803]

>>21884761

[Anonymous No.21891824]

>>21891698
>y-you made me a lot of money
post your trade history then, you shit-for-brains retard
you won't though
you never will
because you're eternally mad
eternally priced out
eternally coping
ALWAYS AND FOREVER AMEN

[Anonymous No.21891866]

>>21891582
I feel bad for you. You’re literally going to waste your 20s watching the charts of a shitcoin.

Keep up your memes though. It’s literally the only thing keeping LINK afloat. If anything goes wrong with implementing WORLD CLASS BLOCKCHAIN MIDDLEWARE, youll have wasted the best years of your life watching charts waiting for a moon.

But you’ll have memes and your hope for a $1000 moonshot.

[Anonymous No.21891876]

[Anonymous No.21892239]

>>21891866
>i-i feel bad for you being in massive profit
>m-memes are the only things keeping link afloat because they're all i'm aware of
>y-you'll be wasting your life doing productive things while it moons
Whoa, POWERFUL arguments from someone who clearly understands what is going on - and totally isn't some dumb dog barking at a car because it doesn't know what to do
maybe you should make a little #neverlinker hashtag on twitter and push for it or whatever it is that retarded faggots do KEK

[Anonymous No.21892355]

>>21891866
You need to go back.

[Anonymous No.21892370]

[Anonymous No.21892444]

>>21892370

[Anonymous No.21892446]

>>21890791
Their partners were in on the scam.

[Anonymous No.21892474]

>>21892446

[Anonymous No.21892514]

[Anonymous No.21892544]

[Anonymous No.21892554]

>>21887458
just stop typing retard

[Anonymous No.21892580]

>>21883735

[Anonymous No.21892597]

>>21883735
It's all coming together. In three hours LINK will pump.

[Anonymous No.21892650]

>>21883735

[Anonymous No.21892718]

>>21892597
You're delusion. Link is over

[Anonymous No.21892734]

>>21883735
cope

[Anonymous No.21892764]

>>21892474
>>21892514
>>21892444
>>21892370

schizo bullshit. Link to 0

[Anonymous No.21892866]

This is important because it shows Chainlink can be used by the masses. No, this isn't a partnership with Microsoft. If it was insiders would have bought all the LINK on the market. That isn't a reason to really trash this news. The more use cases available the more easily it can be adopted. This plugin is great news although it's not going to push the needle too much. We should ve celebrating all accomplishments big and small. Even people who aren't invested, Chainlink doing well is good for the entire crypto market. We almost need chainlink or projects like chainlink to be successful to push blockchain adoption throughout the world.

[Anonymous No.21892895]

>>21883735
this has nothing to do with chainlink

[Anonymous No.21893011]

This helps in areas like creating ISDA agreements between parties. Currently creating an ISDA and CSA is a monumental pain in the ass, but they're hoping to streamline it in the future with standardised clauses that are selected via Microsoft Word templates.

[Anonymous No.21893434]

>>21892446

[Anonymous No.21893539]

>>21886367
A better random number generator could improve minesweeper mine placement.

[Anonymous No.21893657]

>>21890435
>Yorke E Rhodes III has entered the chat.