ATTN: Non Real Life Chads

[Anonymous No.21650868]

You have two options if you want to make it:
Buy 8k RLC today
Take HRT and move to Jakarta in hopes of hooking up with Gilles

The choice is yours. Choose wisely.

[Anonymous No.21650886]

>>21650868
when will it be our turn

[Anonymous No.21650925]

>>21650868
The RNDR network makes your shitcoin useless. The only way to succeed in the decentralized computing space is to have projects that dont already encroach upon centralized solutions. iExec is just trying to become a more costly and painful version of AWS and Google Cloud services. Rndr on the other hand has identified the problem of there not being enough GPU power on public clouds and has found a proper niche where it will continue to grow.

[Anonymous No.21650928]

tfw only 2400 RLC
AHHHH I COULD HAVE HAD SO MUCH MORE IF I SWANG

[Anonymous No.21650962]

>>21650868
>Take HRT and move to Jakarta in hopes of hooking up with Gilles
Gilles is such a cutie, i'll take it

[Anonymous No.21650968]

>>21650868
1-8699 tranny android slave
8700 tranny android master

[Anonymous No.21650993]

1-8699 tranny android sex slave
8700 tranny android master

[Anonymous No.21651025]

>>21650925
TEEs are needed in order for blockchain to become mass adopted. Not all calculations will occur on chain. Even Chainlink admits that TEEs might be needed alongside it's mixicles. That is why LINK is partnered so closely with RLC. RNDR is a meme. No corporation needs a graphics card. What is needed though is trusted hardware to handle their data.

[Anonymous No.21651246]

>>21651025
That is completely false, and there is no proof that iExec and RLC are working together. RLC entering smartcon previously was thought to be a big deal but now that almost everyone is going to it the whole idea that iExec is working together with link is gone. Here is an argument from a chainlink developer as to why iExec is not the solution to the TEE problem.

[Anonymous No.21651370]

>>21650928
Borrow money and go all in
I borrowed 16k usd from a loan shark and now i have 70k usd

Fucking worth it

[Anonymous No.21651408]

>>21650993
One day we will upload our brains onto the decentralized cloud. We will live inside android bodys and have massive digital orgies. But you need at least 8700 RLC to make sure your consciousness will be fully absorbed. Otherwise you'd be a sex slave at best, unable to enjoy the process.

[Anonymous No.21651445]

>>21650968
>>21650993
>>21651408
Stop spamming this shit pfugcker

[Anonymous No.21651494]

>>21650993
One day we will upload our brains onto the decentralized cloud. We will live inside android bodies and have massive digital orgies. But you need at least 8700 RLC to make sure your consciousness will be fully absorbed. Otherwise you'd be a sex slave at best, unable to enjoy the process.

[Anonymous No.21651551]

>>21651246
*iexec and link

[Anonymous No.21651589]

>>21651246
iExec already solved the TEE and SGX problem while link doesnt even have it or staking KEK!

[50cent No.21651764]

In the next bullrun, iExec will forever be known as the only token that dumped during that period. Reason being any sane and rational investors would have offloaded their bags and went all in on Ocean. Sad!

[Anonymous No.21651805]

remember guys, 50cent sold at $1
laugh at him

[Anonymous No.21652023]

>>21651246
>always at the same events, presenting alongside companies like microsoft
>iExec of the first groups invited to smartcon
>mixicles paper literally says some TEE might be needed to help with them

This is just one of many bullish iexec partnerships. Hyperleder Avalon, the Confidential computing consortium, being in the Alpha for googles decentralized computing program. Intel.

The only reason you would be so far up in the Chainlink discord or be paying that close attention to RLC is if you were invested. Low quality FUD attempt.

[Anonymous No.21652133]

>>21652023
You are right that I had bought this coin. I got in at 1.30 and sold at 1.95 when I saw them adding other people to smartcon. This project is total garbage and wont go anywhere because they are having such a hard time on-boarding people. You cant make a decentralized solution of something and expect people to work on it that is far less superior than what I can do right now with AWS. The FUD that I experienced with buying the project is the same fud that exists to date.

[Anonymous No.21652318]

>>21652133
>This project is total garbage and wont go anywhere because they are having such a hard time on-boarding people

The only reason there is no onboarding is because most people involved in crypto are losers with $800 who are trying to flip shitcoins. The massive influx of real enterprise who needs solutions to keep data private and off the main chain hasn't started yet. iExec will be a catalyst for crypto reaching mass enterprise adoption.

[Anonymous No.21652497]

>>21652318
Incorrect, the reason that people are not onboarding onto iExec is because its general purpose is everything that AWS is able to do making iExec a project that is just one-upping Golem. It is really nothing that impressive and there is absolutely no chance that people will turn to iExec for computing resources when it is already so costly and difficult to set-up. You can look at this yourself by trying to run an iExec node and looking at the workers, there is hardly anyone and almost all of the nodes are created by the iExec team, this project has been in development for a few years too.

That is why I am shifting towards RNDR, because it addresses a niche that public clouds right now are unable to solve and that is with lending GPU power. Here is the CEO of otoy and rndr founder talking about this at an AWS conference with other leaders. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AqmPGrrXzA

From my experience products that succeed are the ones that try to find their niche in a world of already heavily centralized services not ones that try to disrupt things because those usually never end well.

[Anonymous No.21652694]

>>21652497
>niche
That niche is so small that literally no one will use it. RNDR barely seems to have any upside.

If iExec is so bad why are people like Intel touting its name and working with them? So much baseless FUD for iExec is making me hyperbullish.

[Anonymous No.21652824]

>>21652694
Can I ask why you think that the GPU computing space is niche? As someone who has worked with machine learning APIs having GPUs on standby is a huge deal in helping speed up training models in compared to traditional CPUs. The end goal of this project is not to just be a source of rendering but to help facilitate highly GPU-intensive fields like machine learning, rendering of course, AR and etc.

The world saw a paradigm shift where CPU power went to GPU power and now the final stage is the emmergence of power GPU cloud services. I believe RNDR can capitalize on this.

There is a big difference between working with and actually using. I don't doubt that intel is working with them in fields related to computational computing but in academia that is common, there is a mutual exchange of information between them so that both can roll out their own individual projects. Im not doubting the iExec since they are stacked with academics/PHDs but them talking does not mean they are releasing something together.

[Anonymous No.21653542]

>>21652824
This guys trying pretty hard to still his shit coin

[Anonymous No.21653614]

>>21653542
>This guys trying pretty hard to still his shit coin


No retard, im helping you as a former iExec holder. I have been with this shitcoin trying to see the benefits of becoming a worker and etc. just like how iexec took over golem rndr will eventually come for iexec

[Anonymous No.21653631]

bollocks.

[Anonymous No.21653634]

>>21652497
Make your own threads pajeet