RLCHADS, GIVE ME YOUR ENERGY

[Anonymous No.20982348]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.20982373]

>>20982348
no trips money go to link soz

[Anonymous No.20982596]

>>20982348
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGILLERINO PARTIE DU TRANNIES I WANT TO GO AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LET ME IN GILLES

[Anonymous No.20982870]

>>20982348
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.20983110]

link is still the better buy

[Anonymous No.20983480]

AAÁAAÁAAÁAAAAAÁAH

[Anonymous No.20983498]

IM COMMPUTINNNNGGGGGGGG

[Anonymous No.20983979]

>>20982348
PROTOCOL ACTIVED!!!

[Anonymous No.20984045]

>>20982870
>870
checked

[Anonymous No.20984252]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

[Anonymous No.20984321]

>>20984252
MY SIDES. KEK

[Anonymous No.20984407]

This gonna bump guys?
I wouldda like to sell SOME rlc for XSN what do you suggest me?
I wold sell because XSN offers staking returns (RLC not)

[Anonymous No.20984414]

>>20982348
Cringe as fuck. Literally dumping right now. You guys are a lost cause

[Anonymous No.20984445]

Trips and I buy 2k worth

[Anonymous No.20984634]

>>20984445
Checked

[Anonymous No.20984715]

This moons along wth Chainlink

[Anonymous No.20984945]

>>20984414
you and i have very different ideas of dumping

[Anonymous No.20985018]

YESSSSSSS BABY HIGH ENERGY PUMP!!

[Anonymous No.20985033]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.20985187]

Just swung more link profits into this bad boy OIL LADS ASSEMBLE!

[Anonymous No.20985284]

This is the next chainlink tier gains

[Anonymous No.20985289]

i still believe in you x

[Anonymous No.20985539]

>>20985187
how many barrels did you manage to accumulate fren

[Anonymous No.20986061]

>>20985539
>how many barrels did you manage to accumulate fren
3000 here
Price target?

[Anonymous No.20986132]

>>20982348
When is it going to go to the mooooooooon

[Anonymous No.20986294]

>>20982348
>>20982596
>>20982870
>>20983498
>>20984045
>>20985033

YOINK

[Anonymous No.20986354]

>>20986132
when you sell

[Anonymous No.20986375]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.20986454]

>$1.16
I guess this is not working

[Anonymous No.20986522]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.20986547]

Why is someone associating DBZ with RLC?
>>20985566

[Anonymous No.20986562]

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/KTOV
https://stocktwits.com/symbol/KTOV
https://stocktwits.com/symbol/KTOV

MOON MISSION BOYS

[Anonymous No.20986570]

>>20982348
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAAHHHHHHJHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.20986815]

gonna buy more
prob it will pump

[Anonymous No.20986842]

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.20987260]

>>20984407

You can earn RLC

>A worker will be rewarded with RLCs for every properly computed tasks.

https://docs.iex.ec/for-workers/quick-worker-start

[Anonymous No.20987350]

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.20988211]

>>20987260
>>A worker will be rewarded with RLCs for every properly computed tasks.
yes but how much?
Let's assume I have a gaming PC and I stake 1000 RLC how much will I earn?

[Anonymous No.20988514]

>>20988211
The number of RLC staked is a requirement set by the job giver.
Just like with LINK you can be a worker without having any RLC, however the more sensitive and intensive a job is the more RLC they will ask to stake and the more they will pay.

[Anonymous No.20988633]

>>20988514
>however the more sensitive and intensive a job
could you make an example?
>>20988514
>the more RLC they will ask to stake and the more they will pay
and an example with this?
thank you by the way

[Anonymous No.20988984]

>>20988633
help

[Anonymous No.20989058]

>>20988633
Not that anon but like rendering a 3D drawing would cost less RLC than running AI models on the entire human genome data sets or some shit

[Anonymous No.20989089]

>>20989058
This
Not all computations will cost the same
It's a very interesting technology

[Anonymous No.20989143]

>>20988633
it's set by the invisible hand of the free market

[Anonymous No.20989275]

>>20989143
And hopefully that invisible hand will jerk me until I COOOOOOOOMMMMM

[Anonymous No.20989305]

>>20988633
>could you make an example?
Let's say you're an engineering company or quant fund and you want to run a computer intensive simulation on a scenario with a lot of money on the line (you don't want your bridge to collapse or your investment strategy to be rekt).
If you use iExec for that (because it allows you to save a lot of money) you need a mechanism to dissuade bad behaviors like for example not doing the computations at all and feeding you bad results.

The best mechanism for that is having multiple parties (worker pools) doing the computations separately AND having them put some funds as collaterals, if they cheat and feed bad results their funds get "slashed" by the smart-contract and redistributed to good actors.
By paying more RLC for a job you force the participants to stake more RLC which past a threshold makes it not economically viable for an attacker to fudge results.

There is an in-depth article by Hadrien on that here:
>https://medium.com/iex-ec/poco-series-2-on-the-use-of-staking-to-prevent-attacks-2a5c700558bd

Obviously for Dapps/smart contracts needing off-chain computations to scale, it's even more fundamental because you can't rely on a centralized cloud provider at all so you need computational results to be as close as the ones from on-chain operations in terms of strength/reliability, that's what PoCo provides.

[Anonymous No.20989604]

>>20989305
BASED

[Anonymous No.20989619]

Here is the interesting part for more a more quantitative approach:

>The different graphs visible above show that, in order for all contributions by honest workers to be rewarded equally, without being affected by the presence of attackers, the stake committed with each contribution to a consensus should range between 20% and 50% of the application cost. This amount represents between 1 and 3 times the benefit expected, which we believe is low enough not to frighten workers while ensuring the good economics of the protocol.

This means that if you want to process a $100 job as a worker you should lock around $20 and $50 in RLC. Of course this should vary with a reputation score, a worker who never cheated would probably need to lock $20 while a newcomer with no past history would need something closer to $50.

[Anonymous No.20989961]

>>20989305
I'm curious as to how apps that involve say a random seed would reach consensus if each worker rightly returns a different result.
Also what would happen in say the case of a power failure and a task is interrupted or not completed? Will that be seen as a bad actor?