Shill me Stakenet vs Blocknet

[Anonymous No.20303392]

Which do I put my LINK profits into and why?

[Anonymous No.20303497]

Both are good buys but if I had to pick one it would be le blocknet.

[Anonymous No.20303532]

Blocknet.

[Anonymous No.20303796]

>>20303392
BLOCK especially if you previously invested in LINK - both are filling major voids in the DeFi space with decentralized oracle solutions

[Anonymous No.20304367]

80% BLOCK, 20% XSN for me

[Anonymous No.20304540]

>>20303392
Blocknet is trash. You must hold the coin to pay trading fees, xsn you don't need to hold. Blocknet isn't lightning enabled either so you have to wait for on-chain confirmations.

[Anonymous No.20304769]

>>20304540
>so you have to wait for on-chain confirmations
wrong! do your research

[Anonymous No.20304789]

>>20303392
XSN if you can afford at least 15k. Don't bother otherwise

[Anonymous No.20304826]

>>20304769
Care to explain how blocknet works? You need the blocknet coin to pay for trading fees no?

[Anonymous No.20305081]

>>20304826
>Care to explain how blocknet works?
DEX basics: https://docs.blocknet.co/protocol/xbridge/introduction/
decentralized SPV basics: https://docs.blocknet.co/protocol/xrouter/introduction/
zero confirmation example: https://twitter.com/ATC_SECURE/status/1280904164692889600

>You need the blocknet coin to pay for trading fees no?
sure, it's an anti spam measure, there are discussions about which tokens to accept as fees, but for now it is BLOCK (discussions are about a percentage of tokens traded, but that's more or less speculative)
right now fees are crazy low, if you trade more than 20$ it is already below 0,1% and it is a fixed fee atm, so below 0,01% for any trade over 200$

[Anonymous No.20305085]

>>20303392
based

[Anonymous No.20305122]

>>20305081
Those documents are very technical, do you need to download the blockchains in order to trade?

[Anonymous No.20305149]

>>20305081
this desu

[Anonymous No.20305298]

>>20305122
the tweet shows the lite wallet in action, with it you only need to have the blocknet chain, give it some time and everything will be lite

[Anonymous No.20305506]

Blocknet is light years ahead of xsn. Stack 5000 BLOCK and get comfy

[Anonymous No.20305533]

>>20305506
How so?

[Anonymous No.20305904]

>>20303392
SWAP to hodl, BUIDL to swing trade and the remainder use to buy something you've wanted but gone without. I bought a microtech Troodon.

[Anonymous No.20305965]

>>20305081
This is not a zero conf settlement, you cannot spend the funds until it’s confirmed as it says right there in the document. This is the same as binance/ liquid / eos, might as well just use their chains instead

[Anonymous No.20306105]

Every month researchers are finding exploits and patching leaking holes in lightning network.

I’m putting my money on a dex built with bullet proof tech like atomic swaps like blocknet.

Don’t forget blocknet is also an interoperability platform with xrouter, basically a chain link on steroids.

Loading up and getting comfy with my block stack desu

[Anonymous No.20306216]

>>20305965
So you do have to wait?

>>20306105
>patching holes
>This is bad
Wtf are you on about?

[Anonymous No.20306227]

>>20305965
sure, you can't do anything on-chain without confirmations, that's pretty self-evident

[Anonymous No.20306250]

>>20306227
Stakenet has lightning + raiden (coming), you can trade instantly without on-chain confirmations.

[Anonymous No.20306365]

>>20306250
as long as i don't have UTXOs on a chain i have bare shit, lighting has still a long way to go

[Anonymous No.20306409]

>>20306365
>lighting has still a long way to go
Care to give your thoughts on why? From what i've seen, the trades on xsn over lightning are extremely stable.

[Anonymous No.20306447]

Ok I can see how they both are useful, blocknet promising for OTC onchain settlements Stakenet good for off chain speed

Both are needed imo and important

[Anonymous No.20306582]

>>20303392
XTZ

[Anonymous No.20306586]

>>20306250
This meme again. You need to confirm in and out of a channel you retard. If you want to bypass retrade conf waiting times, setup multiple utxos and you’re done.

[Anonymous No.20306617]

>>20306586
>confirm lightning channels
>Takes less then 2 minutes to sync
Yikes.

[Anonymous No.20306650]

>>20306617
What does that have to do with the fact that when i want my BTC out of the channel i still have to wait for it to confirm? Fuck off yankeeruinx

[Anonymous No.20306713]

>>20306650
>BTC is a slow piece of shit
Wow nothing new here.
>Implying im yankeeruinx
Fuck of skadoosh

[Anonymous No.20307089]

>>20306713
This is what I can't stand about you XSN retards, but then again it explains why you're all XSN fanboys in the first place: You cats flood /biz/ and regurgitate this "technical" talk that a true technical person knows is pure bullshit and knows you're all talking outta your asses. However, the majority of this space has no idea and they simply "take your word for it." If you guys knew half the shit you were spewing you wouldn't be invested in XSN in the first place.

You guys went all in on this LN shit when it was still "cool" to see what Charlie Lee was saying about anything... just a simple minded way of chasing some publicity via him... hell, I bet you all who hold this shit are the same ones chasing shitcoins like LUX and what not just cause that dingbat McAfee was involved kek. I would say you cucks will learn soon enough, but I don't think your IQ is capable of it, so best of luck to all you XSN bagholding anons cause you'll fucking need it.

[Anonymous No.20307100]

>>20303392
XSN can aggregate Blocknet's entire orderbook

[Anonymous No.20307240]

>>20307100
Based as fuck.

[Anonymous No.20307283]

>>20307089
>n-nobody listened to my fud when i pretended to be a linkie or an eth maxi
>maybe if i pretend to like blocknet to justify my seething hatred of XSN people will finally give me attention - s-SCAM
lol

[Anonymous No.20307412]

>>20307100
Checked and based.
>>20307283
How can blockshit even compete?

[Anonymous No.20307565]

>>20307100
>XSN can aggregate Blocknet's entire orderbook
>talking outta your asses

you mean an arb bot? cool story bros, last time I checked those are quite common

[Anonymous No.20307684]

>>20307565
>s-sure it can do exactly what you just described but i called it a NAME that was supposed to be DEMEANING hH-HA SCAM

[Anonymous No.20307762]

checking back.. oh, thread has gone to shit, gotta love them crypto tribal wars lol

[Anonymous No.20307860]

>>20303392
What are Stakenet and Blocknet for?

[Anonymous No.20307959]

>>20307100
Checked
Based as fuck

[Anonymous No.20308329]

Obviously Stakenet because of the potential of Masternodes.

You could also buy a uniswap gem that just launched last night called PivvrDS (PDS). It's VERY inexpensive right now.

[Anonymous No.20308394]

>>20307565
Cope

[Anonymous No.20309253]

Atomic swaps = block

Lightning swaps = xsn

Atomic swaps are on chain, slow, and will never be commercially feasible. Waste of time.

[Anonymous No.20309306]

>>20309253
Lmao. Fell for the XSN shills eh. Unlucky man, unlucky.

[Anonymous No.20309399]

>>20309253
You can do both atomic and lightning swaps on Stakenet

[Anonymous No.20309651]

>>20309399
This. Just because Stakenet uses L2 doesn't mean it's perfectly capable of doing L1 atomic swaps as well.
Also checked

[Anonymous No.20309675]

>>20309253
This >>20309399 is correct.
>>20309306
Good thing he didn't fall for the blocknet meme.
>Gives code to binance for free, doesn't even get listed
>Gets orderbook aggregated by stakenet
Blockshits can't cope.
>>20309651
Devs have stated normal atomic swaps can be added. Focus is lightning / raiden atm.

[Anonymous No.20309730]

>>20303392
Stakenet easily. XSN going to do a 400x from here over the next year at least

[Anonymous No.20309779]

>>20305506
no it's not. there's been multiple demo vids of the stakenet DEX, plus the beta is live for testing. all we've seen from blocknet is that still image of what their DEX is supposed to look like

[Anonymous No.20309833]

>>20309730
By end of next year, XSN will have done a 1000x from its current price. Screencap this.

[Anonymous No.20309849]

>>20309675
How can you give code for free if the code is already open source dumbass. It's another thing to actually understand the code

[Anonymous No.20309856]

>>20309833
Checked.

[Anonymous No.20309892]

>>20309779
Blocknet's sex has already been live for almost 2 years now. Proof with lite wallet:

https://twitter.com/ATC_SECURE/status/1280904164692889600?s=09

[Anonymous No.20309913]

>>20309892
*Dex

[Anonymous No.20309942]

>>20309849
When blocknet tried to get listed on binance, binance asked to see the code the devs were working on. Then several months after binance released their own 'DEX'.

>>20309892
That UI looks horrible. Pic related is xsn.

[Anonymous No.20310029]

>>20309833
checked and make it pilled

[Anonymous No.20310101]

Fundamentals are a meme and a waste to even discuss. Stakenet seems to have more shills which means its probably more likely to pump.

[Anonymous No.20310122]

>>20310101
Stakenet has much better fundamentals then any other 'DEX', why do you think LINK does so well? Because of fundamentals.

[Anonymous No.20310252]

>>20310122
Link does well because it has the best shills, marketing, exchanges, and market makers. Stakenet cant compete

[Anonymous No.20310255]

>>20309399
FakeNews, txid of proof or false

>>20309675
How do you give away open source code?
unironically no commits on XSN github in all of 2020

>>20309779
I'd say a released product with actual usage is lightyears ahead of a closed-source shitcoin that hasn't been released yet publicly and has zero volume.

>>20309849
this

>>20310122
kek, surely this is a joke right?
>most fundamental DEX
>on most fundamentally centralized LN

[Anonymous No.20310280]

>>20310252
No link does well because it's the only way to connect real world data to the blockchain in a hightly reliable and secure way.

Stakenet is connecting crypto to crypto, starting through lightning and raiden.

>>20310255
You're full of shit. XSN is open sourced. The DEX is in beta testing and will be released within 2 months. Your fud is poor and pathetic just like blocknet.

[Anonymous No.20310287]

XSN shills mad that BLOCK has more utility than XSN and that Blocknet is far more than jUsT a dEX.
Stakenet Discord trannies seething. Go dilate, Yankee.

[Anonymous No.20310370]

>>20310280
Wrong, Blocknet nodes can act as off-chain data oracles with scaling consensus. And at a low end-user cost.
This thread is retarded because Blocknet has more in common with Chainlink than Stakenet. And not even as competition, when you consider that decentralization is the end goal of both projects.

[Anonymous No.20310390]

>>20310370
>Blocknet does oracles
Cope, blocknets oracles are trash. You will never beat xsn or link.

[Anonymous No.20310527]

>>20310280
>You're full of shit
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.20310567]

>>20310527
What is your pic meant to be of?

[Anonymous No.20310714]

>>20310567
He's been posting that screenshot of the core wallet repo for 2 weeks
It's the ace up his fud sleeve before he comes undone again and starts screaming POSW SCAM

[Anonymous No.20310728]

>>20310714
Lmao, the devs have even stated they will work on the core wallet AFTER the DEX is out. Priorities since the corewallet works fine, just not a piece of art.

[Anonymous No.20310943]

>>20310728
Can't they just use the DEX as the core wallet?

[Anonymous No.20310984]

XSN looks like wash trading to me. Not to mention being on one shady exchange its dodgy af.

[Anonymous No.20311038]

>>20310943
The DEX is a dapp built into the light wallet.
You download the xsn blockchain on the core wallet. They don't want the lightwallet to be too chunky so they have the core wallet.

The corewallet can also be used to stake or create masternodes. I'm not too familiar with all the technical stuff the corewallet can do.

>>20310984
Wow the price is stabilizing from the recent pump on a low volume exchange. Also every CEX does wash trading. Livecoin isnt that bad. Just don't store funds on it.

[Anonymous No.20311109]

>>20310390
The only 'cope' is the continuous, baseless, unsubstantiated responses you faggots always retreat to.

At least put some effort in if you want the XSN shill pump to last. I think most of /biz/ is bored of it by now, go back to Plebbit, lads.

[Anonymous No.20311127]

>>20311109
>The only 'cope' is the continuous, baseless, unsubstantiated responses you faggots always retreat to.
>At least put some effort in if you want the XSN fud to last. I think most of /biz/ is bored of it by now, go back to Plebbit, lads.

[Anonymous No.20311355]

>>20303392
Neither. Put your money in the Decentr sale tonight and sell the 5x. Then buy your stupid scams if you still want.

[Anonymous No.20311494]

>>20309942
And their resulting 'dex' is actually the absolute opposite of blocknet's dex as they want it to be centralized we fuck

[Anonymous No.20311672]

>>20303392

>Blocknet

Yes go invest in a project who's Devs are literal retards that gave the biggest competitor their code.

I don't know who is more retarded, Block devs building on 5+ years old tech, CZ trying to steal this tech, or naive investors for throwing money on this trash Kek.

[Anonymous No.20311786]

>>20311672
You're not even trying to FUD. Blocknet's source code was OPEN SOURCE, there is NOTHING to steal. Every project has to go through the listing process of Binance. What Binance did was extremely shady, but no code was 'stolen'. Even if there is an inch of truth of this, then it means Blocknet's Source Code was of superior quality.

Blocknet's dex and binance dex are like day and night, as the latter is extremely centralized, just like it suits them.

BTW the real Chad thing to do is to hold both Stakenet and Blocknet, as they're both promising holds

[Anonymous No.20311806]

>>20310280
XSN's dex and wallet is not open sourced, so no unbiased third party can check the quality of the their dex. Everything from Blocknet is open source however

[Anonymous No.20312126]

>>20311494
>Xsn dex is centralised
Kill yourself nigger.
>>20311672
This is the single best post in this thread.
>>20311786
>>20311806
Cope harder cz, they have a private github for internal testing so people like binance can't steal their code. Everything else is open source.

[Anonymous No.20312244]

Looked through some blocknet stuff and can conclude most people in this thread are talking out their ass lol.

Maybe read about the project before shilling it...

Looks decent but I don't think anyone should invest through all the made up and wrong shit itt

[Anonymous No.20312281]

>>20312244
Don't invest in any of them lmao. Both are built on dead tech and that's why no one outside of /biz/ talks about them.

[Anonymous No.20312423]

>>20312244
This, blocknet and other projects are coping hard right now because stakenet is so far ahead.

Iin their latest dev update they stated
>"We have already executed cross trades from BTC to ETH via Lightning and Raiden and have a proof of concept in place."

https://medium.com/stakenet/xsn-core-dev-update-july-12-2020-72cac6050377

>>20312281
>Dead tech
See above.

[Anonymous No.20312472]

>>20312126
>Thinking when code is open source anyone can steal it and kill the project

Yes anyone can copy a project, but understanding the code requires a lot of domain knowledge. So I don't know why you're so afraid of Binance stealing your code? They already have their 'dex'

[Anonymous No.20312500]

>>20312423
>Claims to be so far ahead
>Doesn't have its project even live

Blocknet's dex has already been live for almost 2 years

[Anonymous No.20312551]

>>20312472
You're a retarded nigger.
I never said
>>Thinking when code is open source anyone can steal it and kill the project
Blocknet directly told binance the inner workings of their DEX which they copied for themselves.

>>20312500
>Blocknet's dex has already been live for almost 2 years
Another shitty 'DEX' that can't even perform properly. Better to release a good proper working product then something average. XSN is extremely far ahead, that's why you have ignored everything said in this thread.

[Anonymous No.20312592]

>>20312551
>inner workings
>copied

proof or fake news - they're based on Cosmos you retard.

>extremely far ahead
Keep reaching faggot. Last i checked too all you guys have is this silly ass LN DEX, nothing else

[Anonymous No.20312679]

>>20312592
https://cryptopotato.com/binance-and-neo-accused-by-blocknet-for-stealing-info-used-to-build-binance-dex/

>These are standard non-intrusive questions that Binance asks all projects applying to be listed. However, when it came to Blocknet, apparently these standard questions were not enough to evaluate their application; Binance’s head of business development, Ashley Ouyang, had then sent an email to Blocknet with an additional application form that included more questions.
>The radio silence from Binance seemed suspicious to Blocknet, and they began reviewing the questions they had answered in the second application. Only then they realized how much more intrusive the questions were, which made them even more suspicious.

Some of the many questions in the second application include information on:

Blocknet’s interoperability infrastructure and whether they could find the code in their GitHub.
Why Blocknet chose to build their DEX
How Blocknet solves the domain name system problem in the blockchain
If Binance could receive access to BlockNet’s private repository to view their latest developments
>As we already mentioned, when Blocknet answered all of these questions and submitted the application, Binance cut off all communication with them and would not reply anymore.

>silly ass LN DEX
Damn son you're a retard. Not only does stakenet have lightning for instant settlement they are also integrating raiden which I posted proof of here
>>20312423
But you ignored that, because you're a poor fudder. You ignore the facts that don't suit you're narrative and act like you don't know any better. COPE.

[Anonymous No.20312732]

>>20312551
>Blocknet directly told binance the inner workings of their DEX which they copied for themselves.
Explaining how open source code works is not 'revealing' shit.
>XSN is extremely far ahead
t. guy who can't even grasp this very simple concept

[Anonymous No.20312780]

>>20312732
>Blocknet and binance shills on suicide watch
Cope, imagine ignoring all the information provided to you. Blocknet has nothing going for them, their tech is obsolete and slow.

[Anonymous No.20312807]

>>20311109
>>20311494
>>20311786
>>20311806
>>20312281
>>20312472
>>20312500
>>20312592
>>20312732
Kek the amount of salt in this thread. Keep coping blockfags.

[Anonymous No.20312823]

>hurr durr nigger
>hurr durr cope
>hurr durr muh lightning

[Anonymous No.20312999]

>>20312780
It doesn't matter. Both Blocknet and Stakenet are working to fix a problem which doesn't exist.

What a load of garbage this thread is. Holy shit. You know there's a reason why no one is talking about this anywhere else than here? Cause it's all useless tech that doesn't improve crypto at all. Not a single bit. Normans don't care about lightning, and crypto day traders will continue to use their preferred platforms. The discord shills have accumulated over the past 2 years and are now slowly exiting. Fucking hell imagine actually buying this shit.

>>20307860
Literally fuck all. Both of them accomplish nothing useful lmao

[Anonymous No.20313019]

And the deadshits thinking that Stakenet is slow compared to Blocknet, has anyone actually sent BTC to lightning faster than a blockdx trade?

Yeah that's right NO ONE here as contemplated that you've got to get BTC onto lightning before you can actually trade on LIGHTNING

[Anonymous No.20313058]

>>20312999
>thread
Clearly shows you know fuck all about DEFI and UTXOs

[Anonymous No.20313095]

>>20312999
>Lightning
>Useless tech
Fuck off and cope harder Cz.

>>20313019
Wtf are you talking about, your sentence isn't clear at all. Speak clearly please.

[Anonymous No.20313107]

>>20313058
See you in 5 years when the amount of usage on your XSN M a S t E r N o D e network is zero tx per day.

[Anonymous No.20313112]

>>20313107
Cope, the masternodes are already profitable.

[Anonymous No.20313182]

>>20313112
If it really was, everyone would be buying it you massive homo lmao. Why isn't everyone rushing to livecoin to get those juicy masternodes just now if they are going to do what that picture says.

Oh that's right, cause your network requires people to actually use it for you to make money. Lemme tell you, no one is gonna use that shit.

[Anonymous No.20313191]

>BlockDX out for 2 years
>Daily trades 6

If it was so good why is no fucker using it? Must be hard to swallow that Stakenet DEX has more users and volume per day in its beta

[Anonymous No.20313223]

>>20310287
>jUsT a dEX.
stop

[Anonymous No.20313224]

>>20313112
how many years away are all of those?

[Anonymous No.20313252]

>>20303392
Swinglinkers get the rope

[Anonymous No.20313261]

>>20313182
People are unaware of XSN because they have flown under the radar for 2 years whilst doing real work.
>>20313191
This, blocknet is trash.

>>20313224
XSN can easily go to $20 without raiden. At 2B MC XSN would be rank 20 which is very low considering what they're doing. Raiden should be done this year btw.

>>20313252
Uses xsn masternode rewards to buy more link. That's what im doing.

[Anonymous No.20313396]

can someone link the stakenet dex repo or is it actually closed source?

[Anonymous No.20313538]

>>20313396
https://github.com/X9Developers/DexAPI/releases/

Dex updates. They have a dev github which is private, goes from devs to this one. As you can see there is am update nearly every day, sometimes twice a day.

[Anonymous No.20313578]

>>20313538
so closed source for now
any plans to make it open at some point in time?

[Anonymous No.20313623]

>>20313578
Once released is what they said as it will be to far ahead for anyone to copy by then

[Anonymous No.20313702]

>>20313623
release is expected within the next 2 months as someone else said?!

[Anonymous No.20313882]

>>20313702
Yes, the DEX will be out within 2 months. They haven't set a release date yet because it's software development where anything can happen that could delay it. It wouldn't look good to set a date and push it back.

[Anonymous No.20313958]

>>20313191
That's 6 trades more per day than Stakenet will have in a year.

>launching a dex with XSN/BTC and LTC/BTC

Wow, sounds amazing man. Can't wait to go trade there. Lmao

[Anonymous No.20313977]

>>20313958
>Adding lightning coins takes less than 2 days
>Stabilizing swaps before adding more features
>Raiden integration at 35%
Damn must suck to hold blocknet right now.

[Anonymous No.20314201]

>>20313958
Haha it’s not launching with those idiot those are just the trading pairs for beta to keep things simple and volume concentrated

[Anonymous No.20314659]

[Anonymous No.20314737]

Lmfaooo How is this even an argument?
>cross chain dex?
>or instantaneous cross chain dex?
hmmmmmmmmmmmm

[Anonymous No.20314748]

>>20314659
Shit meme.
>6 trade a day
Kek, how will blockcucks ever recover?
>>20314737
Who are you talking to?

[Anonymous No.20315344]

>Oh nonononononnooo, HAHAHAHAHA.
Now I understand where all the fudders in the XSN threads have been coming from. They were salty blocknet bag holders all along.

[Anonymous No.20315381]

$100 EOY
BASED.

[Anonymous No.20315714]

>>20312679
You think that 30 minutes to get BTC to a 2nd layer network to then trade is instantaneous. Not to mention Lightning Network is still considered an Experiment. HAHAHA Sucks to be the twats that are building on an experimental networks |whose the bitch now

[Anonymous No.20315718]

>>20303392
Neither. Buy PNK and profit.

[Anonymous No.20315741]

>>20315714
>6 trades daily
>Sometimes 0 trades
Lmao, ohnoohnoohnononono. rip blockshit

>Lightning is still an experiment
Reaching levels of cope not thought possible.

[Anonymous No.20315950]

>>20315381
Based memeposter.

[Anonymous No.20315958]

One of the biggest differences between the two is their business sense.

Blocknet push out a DEX, been running 2 years but nobody uses it. Why? Because the barrier to entry is far too high, nobody is going to take the time to download blockchains of anything they want to want to trade.

Stakenet knows this which is why they built a lightwallet from the start. Also they know if crypto goes mainstream onchain congestion will make any atomic swap DEX struggle especially all these pop up ERC20 services like Uniswap. Stakenet by operating on layer 2 means they will not suffer these issues of increases congestion and cost. Look what happened to ETH with Cryptokitties killing the network as an example.

Last is liquidity, which Stakenet know they need otherwise people won’t use it, again see Blocknet’s DEX. Because Stakenet have instant transaction it means they can use traditional tools used by traders in the markets to provide liquidity like the aggregator. This can’t be done on DEX’s using atomic swaps because the settlements are too slow and in trading ever second matters.

Finally you have the MN owners which are incentivised to get people using Stakenet DEX because they make 90% of the trading fees collected.

So just from a purely business sense perspective on the 2 DEXs Stakenet’s approach makes way more sense

[Anonymous No.20316342]

>>20315958
>Blocknet push out a DEX, been running 2 years but nobody uses it. Why? Because the barrier to entry is far too high, nobody is going to take the time to download blockchains of anything they want to want to trade.
blocknet multi-litewallet beta is already out, used for example here https://twitter.com/ATC_SECURE/status/1280904164692889600
no need to download all the chains

>Stakenet by operating on layer 2 means they will not suffer these issues of increases congestion and cost.
more importantly it does not offer the security of layer 1

>Finally you have the MN owners which are incentivised to get people using Stakenet DEX because they make 90% of the trading fees collected.
it's 100% at blocknet and the incentive to get people use a system is something every token shares

>So just from a purely business sense perspective on the 2 DEXs Stakenet’s approach makes way more sense
until you read about all the problems that come with lightning

[Anonymous No.20316375]

>>20316342
Pure cope. Pulling shit from you arse.

[Anonymous No.20316421]

>>20316375
Sounds like you're just an xsn fanboy. Lightning is dead end tech lmao. See you in a year with worthless bags

Don't forget tho. XSN $100 2021 :D

[Anonymous No.20316450]

>>20316421
>Keeps repeating the same shit the entire thread hoping that makes it true
>L-l-lightning is dead tech guys p-please buy blocknet we get 6 trades a day

[Anonymous No.20316642]

>>20316342
Really as last I saw the light wallet doesn’t have a gui, let’s circle back to barrier to entry shall we.

Trading fees on Blocknet are charged in block so again another barrier to entry as it is forced adoption of the coin Vs Stakenet’s approach of use whatever you want. Again another barrier to entry removed, nobody has to ever touch or hold XSN to use the DEX oh and the remaining 10% of the trading fees are used to buy and burn XSN reducing supply which is another positive for everyone.

Please link to all these problems with LN that you keep bringing up but proving no evidence of.

[Anonymous No.20316657]

>>20316375
lightning is less used than block dx ;)

[Anonymous No.20316708]

>>20316657
Sounds like pajeet tier coping to me. Lightning is used less? Stakenet fixes this.

[Anonymous No.20316748]

>>20316708
>stake net fixes this

Okay dokey. XSN $100 2021 :D

[Anonymous No.20316819]

>>20316708
>Stakenet fixes this.
what is that even supposed to mean?

[Anonymous No.20316826]

>>20316748
Bitfinex and USDT CTO seems to think LN is the future.

>pic related

[Anonymous No.20316865]

>>20316826
>14 retweets

THE FUTURE OF CRYPTO

[Anonymous No.20316912]

>>20316826
jesus will these retards give up
there is NO future for a non government crypto "currency"
dlt, smart contracts, settlement, sure, but no currencies will be allowed to go mainstream and unregulated

[Anonymous No.20317000]

>>20316642

https://coinjournal.net/news/flaw-discovered-in-lightning-networks-cross-chain-functionality/

https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-lightning-network-problems/

this is just 4 days old:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2020/07/09/bitcoins-lightning-network-is-struggling-to-overcome-fundamental-issues/#32cecb065f77

lightning is a total shit show

[Anonymous No.20317256]

>>20317000
>first article Jan 2019 - already solved
>next June 2019 - already solved

So the latest article talks about a theoretical attack used by flooding the channels. If you read the actual paper that was released about this a week or two ago you would know that there are already solutions to this, one being watchtowers which is something Stakenet are running for the hubs so again is a non issue for them.

[Anonymous No.20317559]

>>20317256
third parties? no thank you

[Anonymous No.20317643]

>>20317256
>muh watchtowers
>muh M a S t E r N o D e S

Lmao :D

[Anonymous No.20318182]

>>20316826
Damn these fudders are pathetic.
>>20317256
>>20317643
>Using plebbit tier wojacks, cringe

[Anonymous No.20318228]

>>20317559
>>20317643
Clearly have no idea how LN actually works and still regurgitating years old Bcash fud

[Anonymous No.20318996]

>>20318228
so ever new problems are actually no problems

[Anonymous No.20319097]

>>20305904
Swap over both?

[Anonymous No.20319408]

>>20318996
Can you speak english?