REQ

[Anonymous No.20274354]

Who here been buying the dip for the last 2 years?

I have accumulated 300k REQ

Whats your stack and price prediction?

[Anonymous No.20274367]

>>20274354
what has that been like?

[Anonymous No.20274378]

>>20274354
If true, utter brainlet

[Anonymous No.20274384]

>>20274354
I am surprised anyone is willing to speculate on this after such a REQ'ing.

What are these French losers working on these days? What's new with REQ'd?

[Anonymous No.20274387]

>>20274354
50K bought over the last year. We'll reach $1 next year.

[Anonymous No.20274408]

>>20274384
>>20274378
>>20274367
Why so mad bros
You should have bought the dip
>>20274387
$1 EOY

[Anonymous No.20274453]

>>20274408
There are 5,000+ other shitcoins to gamble on. Tell me what the REQ'd team is working on right now? Have they finished the clickable money web-banner yet? Kek.

[Anonymous No.20274454]

>>20274354
Bought from $0.02 all the way down to $0.008. Got over 500,000. Pretty happy it's hitting $0.04 but some of you are buying too much, because I've been knocked off the top 100 addresses list :(

[Anonymous No.20274470]

>>20274384
1

[Anonymous No.20274533]

I request my money back

[Anonymous No.20274619]

>>20274453
M8. Its easily a $2 or $3 token. Just check the team and their fundamentals.
>>20274454
You are gonna make it bro.. slow steady growth coming. Next stop $0.20

[Anonymous No.20274951]

>>20274354
I once had 4 million req. I dumped a lot of it before it completely lost value. I still have 500k left.

You can speculate all you want on it pumping, but the team is absolute dog shit.

[Anonymous No.20274979]

still have my initial 10k- kinda gave up on it, surprised its at 4cents, idk how id feel if it goes back to 1 dollar (missed out on accumulation)

[Anonymous No.20275028]

>>20274951
Wrong

[Anonymous No.20275108]

>>20274453
hehe :^)

[Anonymous No.20275119]

>>20275028
good comeback

name a single thing the req team or team members have succeeded at

[Anonymous No.20275146]

>>20275108
check gil’s twitter. he already made an app for coinbase’s api. coinbase has no affiliation whatsoever and no one is using gil’s product. if this is the most hopeful info you have then it’s sad

[Anonymous No.20275157]

>>20275108
Bruh you can't post this here, 99% of people have no idea what this is saying. They are just gonna yell MOZZ'D at you.

[Anonymous No.20275160]

>>20274354
50k, $5 eoy

[Anonymous No.20275200]

>>20275157
muh triple entry accounting, muh coinbase. all of it is pie in the sky. nothing concrete has been built. means jackshit

[Anonymous No.20275269]

>>20275200
You’re so defensive. You bought the top didn’t you?

[Anonymous No.20275290]

>>20275200
>>nothing concrete has been built
Just like the rest of crypto then?
Its all speculative

[Anonymous No.20275298]

>>20275269
https://twitter.com/gildedfinance/status/1276591774811615232?s=21

No, I just state facts. See, Gil’s app is not endorsed by Coinbase. It’s third party API. Gil is a good guy, but Req is the wrong horse to bet on. You guys are obviously from a discord tranny PnD group

[Anonymous No.20275317]

>>20275298
Who said Gil’s app is endorsed by coinbase? You’re grasping bro

[Anonymous No.20275376]

>>20275269
Actually I accumulated right after the ICO when it hovered between $0.03-0.06. I dumped at a profit. I am just being responsible and calling out an obvious PnD group when I see one.

The Req team has no skills—interpersonal, dev, business—to succeed. They had to learn some of their skills by working with Kyber in the same office. Kyber ditched those losers, just like the Req founder Etienne Tatur ditched his own company. What you’re seeing now is simply the market maker they hired and chumps like you trying to PnD this low volume shitcoin

[Anonymous No.20275393]

>>20275376
LOL we got it, you can regurgitate the FUD narratives

[Anonymous No.20276076]

Lmfao i forgot this mozzarella coin existed
Made a good 5x on it and never looked back

[Anonymous No.20276146]

>>20274354
Yikes...

[Anonymous No.20276920]

>>20275298
I feel terrible buying REQ at 90 sats oh woe is me!

*Checks price*

485 sats! FUCK I ONLY 5x MY MONEY. IM RUINED! SHIT!

[Anonymous No.20276957]

>>20274354
Lol obvious PnD just now. I’ll let it go and stop posting facts about the team. But that pump was fucking weak. Next time you guys need more funds for a real pump.

[Anonymous No.20277238]

>>20275376
>Hurr durr, it's a PnD.

Gotta love a PnD group that will stick with the same coin for several months without ever actually dumping.

[Anonymous No.20277777]

>>20276957
Stay poor ya dingus

[Anonymous No.20277836]

>>20277777
wasted get for a PnD fucking kill yourself fag, it shouldve gone for a linkie get

[Anonymous No.20277868]

Where the fuck is all this REQ shit coming from in one day? How much are they paying you to shill this garbage ?

[Anonymous No.20277956]

>>20277836
Imagine being this fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.20277987]

>>20277777
Checked and REQt.

Five 77777's proclaim it to be true. Get in REQ or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.20278129]

>>20277777
Omg, ho sana, req $10 eoy

[Anonymous No.20278449]

i still have like 10k req that i bought at 60c

[Anonymous No.20278946]

>>20277238
>>20277777
remember when req was between 1791-1918 sats? yea, i do. cuz that’s when they fumbled Wikimedia and I dumped it all. Call me when Req is back at 1700 sats (lol never). And you know it

[Anonymous No.20278972]

Anyone have any idea why it's actually pumped 5x in the last few weeks?

[Anonymous No.20279073]

>>20278972
pump and dump discord groups

[Anonymous No.20279101]

>>20278972
gotta pump it before delisting

[Anonymous No.20279165]

>>20278972
Progress. Read the updates or the AMA or the Discord. Those who know, know.

[Anonymous No.20279232]

>>20279165

You're saying people are actually reading the dev updates and buying it based on the tiny increments of progress they've made?

Looks like they're still pretty much were they were in late 2017: no working product and no clients.

Doesn't pass the smell test for me..

[Anonymous No.20279292]

>>20279165
i’ve been reading their hollow updates since 2017. they never deliver. there’s nothing to show for.

lol “200 clients onboarding” my ass. you’ll see...it’s bullshit

[Anonymous No.20279674]

>>20277777
include me on screen cap

[Anonymous No.20279844]

>>20277777
Checked and Brule-pilled
100k reqlet checking in

[Anonymous No.20280294]

>>20279844

Feels terrifying buying now, I bet it retraces back to 260 SATs.

[Anonymous No.20280308]

the fact even req is pumping means were entering an alt bullrun

prepare

[Anonymous No.20281275]

>>20279292
But haven’t you seen the increase activity on the contract?

[Anonymous No.20281347]

>>20277777
Wtf! 15k reklet reporting in. Praise kek!

[Anonymous No.20281411]

>>20281347
REQ always gets the sick digits

[Anonymous No.20281803]

>>20277777
REQ ALWAYS GETS THE SICKEST DIDGETS

$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.20281908]

REQ has been constantly fudded on this board for over 2 years. Anybody with half a brain would have bought a decent stack at the fire sale price it traded at for months on end but instead most here missed the boat ((again)).

[Anonymous No.20282073]

that's one heavy bag anon

[Anonymous No.20282572]

>>20282073
yikes that fucking chart

[Anonymous No.20282932]

>>20281908
Exactly this

[Anonymous No.20282967]

hoooooldiiiiiiing with tears in my eyes

[Anonymous No.20283439]

>>20277777
5 usd eoy

[Anonymous No.20283695]

>>20283439
can confirm

[Anonymous No.20284441]

$1 EOM

[Anonymous No.20284668]

>>20283695
Big if true

[Anonymous No.20284824]

>>20274619
>M8. Its easily a $2 or $3 token. Just check the team and their fundamentals.
Delusional. The team is shit. The fundamentals are terrible. Why would this ever get to $3?
Can any one of you retards even explain how REQ is actually used in their platform?
>>20275298
You tried anon. The discord shills will argue, the retards will be confused, but true biznessmen see REQ for this shit it is.

[Anonymous No.20285259]

>>20275376
why did etienne ditch the team? any source?

[Anonymous No.20285798]

>>20284824
Same old FUD: team is shit, bad fundamentals, etc.

All easily disproven.

Why do you even bother arguing?

[Anonymous No.20285837]

>>20278449
I bought 3000 at 30c in 2017 and just under a million at 1.5c to DCA
Let's go!

[Anonymous No.20285845]

>>20285798
Just leave him m8. Non REQers will see soon enough. Bargain of the last 2 years

[Anonymous No.20285910]

>>20285837
A million...phew. What’s your target to sell?

[Anonymous No.20285983]

>>20285910
I'll see how the market plays out.
Remember 2017 and the biz/ Holy Trinity?
LINK
REQ
QSP
But to be honest - I'll ladder sell on the up starting @ 20c

[Anonymous No.20286053]

>>20285983
I bought bitcoin at $80 per coin. I have been here a while. This is a good investment. You will do well anon

[Anonymous No.20286089]

>>20286053
Thanks mate - best of luck to you too

[Anonymous No.20286258]

[Anonymous No.20286320]

>>20285983
I came up with that :)

[Anonymous No.20286321]

There are so many useless shitcoins that are worth a lot more, REQ was bound to pump hard at some point.

[Anonymous No.20286336]

>>20286320
Well, I definitely helped push it as it was what I was holding. I don’t even know how crypto works but it sounded like a good trio :D

[Anonymous No.20286404]

>>20286320
Bless you - because that is what got me on to LINK!

[Anonymous No.20286555]

>>20285798
>All easily disproven.
Disprove all of these then. It should be easy for you.
The team fucked up all of their partnerships.
Their main devs left.
The founder left.
They fucked up their CDP and shortened their runway.
The team hired a market maker which is why they are pumping.
The token is literally not needed. You can create and pay requests without using REQ.

[Anonymous No.20286608]

>>20286555
Hey mate wanna threaten to post Robbins selfie again?

Stay mad.

[Anonymous No.20286639]

>>20285259
Just check Etienne Tatur’s linkedin or Req’s previous AMAs. He left without explanation

[Anonymous No.20286670]

>>20286555
>Asking to disprove all your baseless claims

You're clearly a salty top-buyer

[Anonymous No.20286762]

>>20286670
pic related. Req bagholders all excited about the reqtokenburn graph I bet. Someone probably designed a bot to buy when this graph goes up. The burn rate is not even high - probably just some oajeet company testing it out.

Burn rate still has to go up 100x to make any sort of difference. Without staking, the token is still worthless. Oh, and they were “thinking about staking” in 2017. Yea, this team does not execute.

[Anonymous No.20286815]

>>20286762
>grasping at straws for new FUD

LOL keep trying bud

[Anonymous No.20286831]

>>20286815
ok emmanuel

[Anonymous No.20286869]

i could shit a turd with DEFI stamped on it and it would moon

[Anonymous No.20286922]

>>20286831
>the cope is strong with this one

[Anonymous No.20286957]

>>20286608
Wrong anon. I'm not the only one who realizes this is a shitcoin.
>>20286670
Couldn't even disprove one?
kek baseless. They are all facts you retard.

[Anonymous No.20287017]

B bbut guisee ycumbinator

[Anonymous No.20287051]

>>20286957
>Doesn't understand burden of proof

You're the one making the claims idiot

[Anonymous No.20287100]

>>20286922
all you got are memes, no facts or rebuttal. let’s talk about the merits of the project. If they are “onboarding” so many—100 to 200— companies, surely one of those companies would reveal themselves right? Just like those anonymous Request Fund companies that signed up before (all of whom remain anonymous kek).

I smell an exit scam. Let’s see who is actually burning those tokens...

[Anonymous No.20287119]

>>20287051
>All easily disproven.
If they were easy to disprove you would have done it. Anyone following the project knows those are facts. Keep on shilling your shitcoin to retards. Maybe you'll get lucky and they will fomo instead of researching.

[Anonymous No.20287122]

>>20287100
Prove any one of your claims then I'll take you seriously

[Anonymous No.20287138]

Burn rate do be increasing tho

[Anonymous No.20287143]

>>20287119
>Anyone who follows the project knows those are facts

inb4 no true scotsman fallacy

[Anonymous No.20287166]

What about gnosis using it? And maker? Circle tweeting about it a few days ago? Full encryption was just released and will enable a lot

[Anonymous No.20287170]

>>20279232
They're launching the request invoice beta right now and are onboarding 200+ clients manually. They have finished encryption and will be integrated into gilded's accounting solution which is used by CMC. They have been integrated into multis and gnosis. Read up on these things and you'll realise it's way undervalued even after this pump.

[Anonymous No.20287196]

>>20287170
Let them live in denial

[Anonymous No.20288087]

>>20286555
> Gnosis & Multis still up, more partnership to come
> Devs still here, you filthy liar.
> Founder still here, you filthy liar
> Crash happens
> Which market maker?
> Token will be needed to run nodes and decrease fees.

Watch our $$ growing and hate on it

[Anonymous No.20288444]

>>20287100
>>20287100
>>20287100
>>20287100

Everyone look at this idiot trying to apply logic to the cryptospace. The fact that they are trying so desperately to make sense of things shows they don't actually understand anything.

This is what a fool looks like who will never make it.

[Anonymous No.20288491]

>>20275376
Same and agreed; req is a supershitcoojn

[Anonymous No.20288588]

>>20286404
Awesome! To bad I sold my last 10k When I took a year off /biz/ but I spent most of 2017 shilling it. Hopefully I convinced many and some people got rich :)