I am responsible for 95% of the RLC posts over the past 2 years.

[Anonymous No.20252941]

How does this make you feel?
That I am the sole reason you know this coin exists?
That I am the sole reason the idea of digital oil exists?
That I am the sole reason that you will become a millionaire in 2 years time?
If only you listened.
I shilled mostly when it was $0.35, $0.25, $0.20, and even when it went to it's lowest point.
This coin will outpace every coin going into the next 2 years.
Buying right now is like buying ETH at 25 cents.
All you had to do was listen to my extremely in-depth shilling.

[Anonymous No.20253014]

>>20252941
i am ready gilles!

[Anonymous No.20253028]

>>20252941
No

[Anonymous No.20253037]

Will 1000RLC make me rich?
I don't need much, only like 500k to retire

[Anonymous No.20253042]

>>20252941
I am in now and ready for the ride. Let's go boys!

[Anonymous No.20253218]

>>20253014
>>20253028
>>20253037
>>20253042
1000 RLC is okay, but 10k is a real make it stack.

[Anonymous No.20253265]

>>20252941
I had 150k RLC at one point but I gave up on this shitcoin. The team ignores the community and there is almost 0 adoption by businesses right now.
I still own 10k just in case though

[Anonymous No.20253299]

>>20253265
A mistake you will want to kill yourself over.
The team communicates quite well actually. Just visit the slack.

[Anonymous No.20253355]

>>20252941
I hate everyone and everything on this earth, but this thread makes me feel nothing.

[Anonymous No.20253356]

The big partnership was Casio? lmao. I'm dumping this shit

[Anonymous No.20253380]

>>20252941
were you also the guy who claimed he was a whale and was about to pump the price last year?

[Anonymous No.20253386]

>>20253356
its microsoft anon. cant you see the windows?

[Anonymous No.20253465]

>>20253299
I've seen a lot of valid points raised up by the community on slack and the team just ignores most of them. I may buy back some once it gets just a little adoption

[Anonymous No.20253571]

My anus is lubed gilles

[Anonymous No.20253601]

>>20253380
No
>>20253386
High chance it's microsoft.
>>20253465
Doubt they are valid points then.
Why would you buy when adoption occurs instead of before it? You lose a lot of potential gains by doing it that way, as crypto is mostly speculative anways.

[Anonymous No.20253725]

>>20253601
I agree I think it could be Microsoft since they will even be at the conference either that or the Orange company in France, but I'm really hoping for Microsoft. That would be huge and it would moon.

[Anonymous No.20253904]

>>20253386
Or amazon its logo has 5 cubes and by the size of squares on iexec pic it should be 5 of them.

[Anonymous No.20254297]

>>20253904
I'm going with this one. The tech giant is Amazon with AWS.

[Anonymous No.20254319]

>>20252941
I have been shilling with you. mayb 0.02% of the posts though. t RLC belieber

[Anonymous No.20254463]

>>20254297
AWS is possible.
Anything is possible at this point, due to the CCC.
>>20254319
I know there are a couple RLC shillers left and I appreciate you guys. Just saying most days I won't see a single RLC thread and it feels bad considering how good the token actually is, or the threads will be low quality. That's why I take lead and shill it. People will come around eventually, as my logic is hard to ignore.

[Anonymous No.20254498]

>>20254463
Thanks bro, we're all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.20254614]

>>20254498
Indeed we are. iExec is the world's first decentralized supercomputer. I saw an interview with ETH's cofounder where he envisioned a world supercomputer.

I wonder if he knows about iExec.

[Anonymous No.20254805]

>>20254614

[Anonymous No.20254858]

>>20254614
Of course he knows lmao, although I think he underestimates everything that's not ETH itself.

[Anonymous No.20254895]

>>20254463
I burnt out constantly fighting schizo trolls dont even try to shill it any more just few sarcastic post from time to time.

[Anonymous No.20254958]

>>20254805
Kek, love this meme.
>>20254858
Maybe he does. Would be cool to get a confirmation. I think he thought ETH would be the worldcomputer itself, when in reality it is the blockchain backbone FOR the worldcomputer. It is the "enabler" for the worldcomputer iExec.

[Anonymous No.20254989]

>>20254895
Yeah. The schizo trolls are definitely annoying to fight on a daily basis, but I understand, because they are mostly LINK holders that want everyone and anyone to buy LINK to pump their bags.

I actually want iExec to be adopted for the sole purpose of changing the world of computing.

[Anonymous No.20255106]

>>20254989
Welp at least I can cope while sitting with top 150 holders

[Anonymous No.20255172]

>>20252941
Pretty sad. You could have been 100x in that time instead of jerkingnoff over those sad gains.

[Anonymous No.20255212]

are any of you actually from the sinking city of Jakarta?

[Anonymous No.20255236]

>>20252941
seemed like one person desu

[Anonymous No.20255251]

>>20255106
New world-changing technologies sadly take longer than others to give the returns only a God would wish for. However, I am comforted by the fact that iExec has essentially been in development since 2001, and is currently in it's 5th or so year.
>>20255172
Who's to say I only hold iExec? I made a 50x with TRX. I'm well off from other investments and inheritances. I'm far from poor. iExec is just very special to me, and I see great returns from it in the future.

[Anonymous No.20255431]

>>20255251
KEK. You won a bet, but wouldn't accept it was all luck. You had to convince yourself that you were in fact a great investor who sees things others don't, not just some lucky fool. So you "researched" RLC and probably some other garbage and married the shit out of them and have been bagholding for 2 years.
Accept that it was luck. Accept that you're not special. Be thankful and move on with your life.

[Anonymous No.20255549]

>>20255431
Why do you hate winners? Is it because you are a loser?
Me getting a 50x on TRX was some luck and some research. It had the right elements so I took a risk and it paid off, that's just how it goes.

RLC is very unique. That is why I love it so much. I am special, at least more than you.

[Anonymous No.20255739]

>>20255549
Bro just accept it. Look in the mirror and say "I got lucky. And that's OK". Free yourself from the bondage of thinking that luck must be earned.

[Anonymous No.20255772]

>>20255739
You don't know what you're talking about. TRX was easy to know it would pump and I exited when I felt euphoric. If you didn't know what would catch on with normies that's your own deficiency.

[Anonymous No.20255912]

Why do they do this to Haiwu?

[Anonymous No.20255985]

why does iexec always get shit on?
literally no other project has the connections iexec has
yet it struggles just to stay in the top 100 while vapor defi projects seem to moon everyday

[Anonymous No.20256014]

>>20255912
Haiwu is based. That's why.
>>20255985
Fear? People hate what they fear.
Why doesn't it get attention?
It's about to. Can't you see?

[Anonymous No.20256086]

I got in yesterday. I have a good feeling bros.

[Anonymous No.20256119]

>>20256014
>It's about to. Can't you see?
had the same feeling during v4 but nothing happened

look at Ocean Protocol,
coinbase gave it massive support by introducing it into coinbase custody while the entire project revolves around encrypted datasets which iexec introduced with v3

[Anonymous No.20256156]

>>20256086
Yep, its gonna pump soon.

[Anonymous No.20256163]

When is the announcement?

[Anonymous No.20256255]

>>20256119
v4 did an 8x from the bottom, and the swingers/whales won. That's crypto trading for you, it happens with almost every coin that isn't LINK. Eventually those whales and swingers will get rekt. Every version from 1-3 was baby steps for iExec. Just getting the basics down. v4-5 are when iExec begins to mature and actually get adopted. The hype around v5 will propel it into the news cycle and thus the violent cycle of adoption and speculation will begin.

That's how I see it. iExec was always a long play. Yes I swung from v1-4, but not my entire stack, just in case.
From v5 on I will be holding. I am set for life, and not risking my stack.

[Anonymous No.20256290]

>>20256255
How much you got anon , I have 6.5k

[Anonymous No.20256302]

>>20256255
saved. great image.

[Anonymous No.20256323]

>>20256290
Over 100k. Not gonna dox my wallet lol.
If RLC goes on the same bullrun as LINK it's like having 1.1M LINK.

[Anonymous No.20256381]

>>20256255
based

[Anonymous No.20256457]

>>20256323
Post pic of wallet ( no blockfolio)
Or stop larping

[Anonymous No.20256475]

Proud of my 1k stack. Just got in yesterday

[Anonymous No.20256479]

I only have 3.5k RLC. No Larp because I'm poor, I wish I was larping.

[Anonymous No.20256493]

>>20256457
I'm not showing you exactly how much RLC I have.
I can tell you are poor since you think over 100k RLC is a lot of money. You realize it was at $0.18 at one point right?

[Anonymous No.20256564]

>>20256493
Im a believer in this, but if I may ask... Why is it still dumping? Obviously a good time to buy more tho and I would, but alas I only have 32 eth left

[Anonymous No.20256574]

just sold half my stack, pump's over bois

[Anonymous No.20256580]

>>20252941
BASED. ITS OVER GILLES

[Anonymous No.20256604]

>>20256493
Keep larping Ranveer

[Anonymous No.20256631]

>>20256564
Don't spend all of your ETH. It will probably perform well soon. Why is RLC "dumping"? It's not... It's a correction, because if you know how to read charts you can see that we slightly overextended too quickly.

Look at this chart anon... Does that look like dumping to you?

[Anonymous No.20256653]

>>20256604
Keep staying poor Krapnet?

[Anonymous No.20256669]

>>20256604
>>20256653
damn those are awful pajeet names lmao

[Anonymous No.20256678]

>>20256631
No I see that its correcting and ready to leg up but my question is HOW FAR WILL IT CORRECT

[Anonymous No.20256690]

>>20256669
Ranveer and Krapnet, fucking hilarious

[Anonymous No.20256717]

>>20256678
Ah see you are looking short term. That's your issue. 2 years of resistance. You think it will go down to the green line again before it goes over the red one?

Only time will tell.

[Anonymous No.20256749]

>>20256717
Where does it go if it breaks resistance
(Which it will this month)

[Anonymous No.20256802]

>>20256493
Why would anyone want to rent computing power with iExec when they can already do that with any cloud service, i.e. Azure or AWS?

[Anonymous No.20256812]

>>20256749
Sell already you emotional fag , crypto is clearly not for you.

[Anonymous No.20256853]

>>20256749
In my opinion, RLC was extremely undervalued and unknown by most. I attribute that to the name and logo. It's a blessing in disguise.
The undeniable change that is happening is awareness. You can see this in how it's being shilled by Youtubers finally, to a small degree.
Awareness will increase value by at least 10 fold.
Now do I think it will reach 10$ this month? No, maybe 5$ on hype alone, but if the announcement EOM is of large importance? Amazon Google Microsoft? Then it will have a violent trading year. It could reach 20-50$ by EOY if adoption is happening alongside speculation and supply suck(there isn't that much RLC left on exchanges from what I understand).

When people in the mainstream talk about "investing in blockchain technology instead of (whatever coin)", they are talking about iExec. iExec is the epitome of blockchain technology.

[Anonymous No.20256912]

>>20256802
iExec will make it cheaper, more accessible, and more advanced. That's the nature of a decentralized open marketplace. iExec allows those giant corporations to come together on a decentralized platform and utilize the new technologies it offers. Whether it be working together in worker pools or competing by offering unique cloud services through it(affordable AI, Machine learning, data renting). Not only that, but iExec allows something special. Sharing data without actually sharing the sensitive parts to the outside.

Sure, any random pajeet with a gaming PC can set up a worker too, but that's the glory of it all. It's an open marketplace, for anyone to join, from pajeets to the biggest cloud providers in the world.

[Anonymous No.20256962]

>>20256853
I just put another eth in. Fuck I cant stop

[Anonymous No.20256965]

>>20256912
The idea people can't grasp is that you'll be able to select your workerpool
In iexecs case there will be a AWS workerpool, IBM workerpool, azure workerpool ...
So you'll be able to select the cheapest/fastest and switch workerpools if one goes down.
Considering amazon/Microsoft/IBM is collabing with iexec, they see the same vision too. Truly decentralized cloud computing

[Anonymous No.20256993]

>>20256965
*puts another eth in*

[Anonymous No.20256996]

>>20256962
I'm always DCAing. I truly believe that RLC has the most potential of any blockchain technology on the market right now. The realization of that occurred when I realized this

>When people in the mainstream talk about "investing in blockchain technology instead of (whatever coin)", they are talking about iExec. iExec is the epitome of blockchain technology.

And also the fact that the Confidential Computing Consortium is directly related to advancing the adoption of the biggest use case of iExec, and that iExec is one of the only blockchain projects in the CCC.

[Anonymous No.20257032]

>>20256965
Yep. AWS workerpool, Google workerpool, pajeet workerpool, FREE workerpool(yes, some people will DONATE their computer aka Folding@home).

The possibilities are endless. Not only that but it's incredibly easy to convert normal apps into dApps that run on iExec.

[Anonymous No.20257080]

>>20256912
Azure won't be overtaken by some glorified botnet. It's too lucrative and too successful for that to be allowed. Companies trust MS/AWS, they are not going to accept their services being run on Pajeet's PC in a shack in Bangalore. More likely scenario is that MS/AWS develop their own decentralized computing service. The have more resources to do it than some autist crypto devs.

[Anonymous No.20257116]

>>20256965
Doesn't that become a race to the bottom? Where is the incentive for AWS/MS to join this. It just increases competition.

[Anonymous No.20257142]

>>20257080
>Azure won't be overtaken by some glorified botnet.
You don't understand what iExec is. It's a decentralized tool for these companies to use. It's simply a marketplace for cloud with no middleman.
Centralized cloud companies can most definitely be priced out by workerpools of "random pajeet PC's", and because iExec's PoCo algorithm and staking ensure that everything is trustless.

You need to do some more research and video watching into the basics of decentralization anon.

>More likely scenario is that MS/AWS develop their own decentralized computing service

Do you even realize what you just said? Completely hypocritical to your main point.
>A centralized company will make a decentralized competitor to their own lucrative business

[Anonymous No.20257179]

>>20257116
A race to the bottom? Or a race to the ideal price of computing instead of middleman oriented computing making it inaccessible for a large portion of the world?

AWS/MS will have no choice but to join eventually. They can try and compete but the market will see profits shrink compared to using a decentralized alternative.

[Anonymous No.20257192]

>>20257142
Can you stake RLC?

[Anonymous No.20257223]

>>20257192
You have to stake RLC when you run a worker. It's not a pure staking coin in the same sense of the word, you have to run a worker and get jobs to earn RLC. The stake is there to ensure bad actors don't act bad.

[Anonymous No.20257225]

>>20257192
Please NO

[Anonymous No.20257272]

>>20252941
Thanks for all the annoying shilling. Didn't buy your shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.20257286]

>>20257142
What is this showing? Chainlink providing the data/trust and iExec providing the computing power? Does it depend on chainlink?

[Anonymous No.20257297]

>>20257272
You're welcome. I'll continue until iExec is in the top 10.

[Anonymous No.20257299]

>>20257223
Oh so thats a good thing. The token actually has a real usecase.

[Anonymous No.20257319]

>>20257272
Guess we will leave you behind, no worries.

[Anonymous No.20257341]

>>20257286
It doesn't depend on chainlink, because iExec also has oracles(albeit not as known/"adopted" by the industry) because LINK takes that crown.
The diagram shows that LINK+RLC are extremely powerful together. LINK provides the trusted data and RLC provides the trusted computation.

[Anonymous No.20257383]

>>20257297
I think this will absolutely be in the top 10. Many of these projects don't have real world practicality or use. This will fly up very soon and has been flying under the radar for too long. I've always seen it shilled, but never actually looked into what it was. It was a mistake, but I feel like I'm here before the real take off into the top 50 soon.

[Anonymous No.20257399]

>>20257383
Same dude. My eyes are open.

[Anonymous No.20257401]

>>20252941
0/10 larp, I didn't buy years ago because of the guy you are larping as, I did it because it was fucking obvious

[Anonymous No.20257459]

>>20256853
Its also cause amerifats can’t buy it.

>t. I have a grandfathered binance account so I can buy any rlc for amerifats. Just send eth to my binance address ;)

[Anonymous No.20257475]

>>20257341
What's your opinion on other decentralized computing tokens: eg. Cardano?

[Anonymous No.20257499]

>>20257401
I mean if you don't remember me as "RLCbro"... you weren't there. RLCpimp was another guy, dunno if he's still here.

>>20257383
Indeed. Many don't. iExec just needs to keep grabbing attention. It is very real when I created the digital oil meme. I found out after I made the digital oil discovery that even Gilles himself had envisioned it as a sort of digital oil as well. I don't have the image anymore, maybe someone else can find it. He related it to being gas in a car, you don't know where that gas is from but you know it works for your needs. You don't know where your cloud computing is, but you know it works for your needs when you power it with RLC.

[Anonymous No.20257576]

>>20257475
Cardano, didn't they get outed for being a scam? Either way, not really worried. They are probably 10 years behind iExec in reality if they are trying to do the same thing.
Golem has terrible tokenomics and is mostly a rendercoin, doesn't have nearly the same number of functions iExec does.

There really aren't any other computing coins worth mentioning that are either dead or scams

[Anonymous No.20257657]

>>20257576
Also looked at Cardano's website and roadmap, yeesh what a bunch of overly-pretentious hipster garbage. Can't find a lick of real information that isn't completely shrouded in overly pretentious wording. Yikes.

[Anonymous No.20257704]

>>20257499
>RLCbro
you're just larping as him, that's all I'm saying.

[Anonymous No.20257735]

>>20257704
No it's most definitely me, been here for a long time

[Anonymous No.20257753]

>>20257499
>Scales your shitcoin of choice
I told you this isn't true back then bro

[Anonymous No.20257782]

>>20257753
This is a great article to read and more relevant than ever.

https://hackernoon.com/blockchains-need-iexec-the-market-just-hasnt-realized-it-yet-5597c743cd0a#:~:text=iExec%20is%20your%20tool..,slowing%20down%20the%20Ethereum%20network.

[Anonymous No.20257803]

>>20257753
Also you are kinda wrong. Not calling LINK a shitcoin, but clearly iExec helps scale it per this image. >>20257142

[Anonymous No.20257852]

>>20257803
yes in that sense it might be true but when I think about crypto and scaling I think about the speed of transferring value from one address to another, and iExec won't help with that, that is up to the consensus protocol

[Anonymous No.20257873]

>>20257852
For sure. I know what bottlenecks are lol, but to say it's not true is disingenuous when we have an example. :P Whoever made that meme probably had no clue either which is funny.

[Anonymous No.20257890]

>>20257657
Why does it have such a big market cap?

[Anonymous No.20257917]

I wish I had more money to buy the shit out of this. fuck corona

[Anonymous No.20257929]

>>20257890
Dunno, you can ask that about any coin in the top 20 that you think is a scam or worthless. Maybe the hipster shit works on investors.

[Anonymous No.20257993]

>>20257735
larp as assblaster next time pls

[Anonymous No.20258019]

anyway the point is that you had to be SEVERELY retarded not to buy a good RLC stack

[Anonymous No.20258021]

>>20257993
Okay anon, whatever you want :)

[Anonymous No.20258056]

>>20258019
Based.
1 RLC will equal over $11,490 within 10 years.

[Anonymous No.20258499]

>>20258056
Why 11490? Where does this meme number come from?

[Anonymous No.20258628]

>>20258499
When the total crypto mc is in the tens or hundreds of trillions RLC will most likely take 1t of that given the facts. 900b is 11490 per RLC.

[Anonymous No.20259167]

Funny how Ive made half the memes on this post and still think you're paid pajeets shilling the version P&D

[Anonymous No.20259338]

>>20252941
I don't really care because I'm all in LINK

I don't even know what the RLC price is right now

[Anonymous No.20259340]

>>20252941
We know that a very small group of people brigades biz with this garbage. And we know you're just going to mysteriously vanish on the next V release dump
>t-the other versions were just baby steps
LMAO yeah, that's why there was a legion of street shitters shilling this garbage every time. Gilles should pay to have his midwit book shilled on lit instead, it'd probably work out better.

[Anonymous No.20259497]

>>20259340
>>20259338
>>20259167
Street shitting pajeets

[Anonymous No.20259537]

>>20259497
>40 posts by this ID
>Projecting this hard

Once you make a thread where you aren't 30% of the replies you can call other people pajeets. Does anyone even fall for this garbage? Try answering honestly for once, do you actually make decent money tricking newfags? I'm genuinely curious after seeing you PND discord trannies for over a year now

[Anonymous No.20259561]

>>20259537
Maybe read those 40 posts and you'll learn something.

[Anonymous No.20260121]

>>20259561
Are you the same anon who would have been answering questions at 3 am like 6 months ago and says he is a computer scientist? Also I understand how the token could be used in an adoption scenario but what would stop an alternative or replacement token from being used, given this is a premine? Similarly, what would stop an entity from basically copy/pasting the whole project into basically a facsimile but separate system?

[Anonymous No.20260165]

>>20260121
No.
> but what would stop an alternative or replacement token from being used
You have to use RLC to use iExec
>Similarly, what would stop an entity from basically copy/pasting the whole project into basically a facsimile but separate system?
You can ask that about any cryptocurrency.
Nothing.

[Anonymous No.20260167]

>>20252941
Link holder here, recently acquired a 10k stack.

Random question, what are your thoughts on Idena? It might be a shitcoin but something about it keeps bringing me back to it

[Anonymous No.20260186]

>>20260167
>Idena
Never heard, sounds like a scam with a 5k volume.

[Anonymous No.20260236]

>>20259497
>n-no YOU'RE a street shitting pajeet, v5 is the TRUE MOON SIRS
Sure thing, Ranjesh. That's why I'm the one proudly declaring that I'm the one making 95 percent of the posts begging people to buy his shitcoin on biz. Just fuck off back to telegram, or reddit, or wherever it is that low IQ pieces of shit like you spend your time. You're only going to get blown the fuck out here.

[Anonymous No.20260267]

>>20260236
>Fuds every one of my posts with the same image thinking it means anything.
Stay poor pajeet.

[Anonymous No.20260277]

>>20260186
Well you should look into it, the idea is that you can use it as a source of personhood (a transaction from an Idena wallet is provably done by a human being, so you can use it for things like trustless voting)

But what are your thoughts on other off-chain computation projects like 1) Golem and 2) Arbitrum?

[Anonymous No.20260306]

>>20260277
>1) Golem
Trash
>2) Arbitrum?
Interesting, but not similar to iExec.

[Anonymous No.20260341]

>>20253218
Thank you ser just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.20260385]

>>20260306
Well, explain. How so?

[Anonymous No.20260418]

>>20260165
>You have to use RLC to use iExec
I guess there is no incentive for the RLC team themselves to change protocols. But that gets back to

>You can ask that about any cryptocurrency.
>Nothing.

Which is true for most but not PoW coins since the chain and history of those themselves have value. This is actually why I have qualms about any premine in general, since if any reach real adoption (which I don't think any have yet beyond speculation) there is nothing stopping a literal copy paste job of the code and I can see great incentive for doing so. I can even see the value in the idea behind RLC but I still haven't found a counterargument to the replicability of any premine token, where the incentive to do so would reveal itself if adoption ever occurs, for any of these projects. This is why I'm much more convinced of PoW coins in general, but I want to hear counterarguments to that point specifically.

[Anonymous No.20260455]

>>20260267
>d-don't post that image I can't refute it just buy before v5 sirs
It's your least favorite image because it shows anyone newer to biz the clear pattern that pops up every single time that you dumb niggers start spamming the board. Dozens of poorly worded shill threads which die after 20 responses of the same few idiots circlejerking, leading up to the big dump.

[Anonymous No.20260476]

>>20260418
>there is nothing stopping a literal copy paste job of the code and I can see great incentive for doing so.
Who would do this? A centralized cloud company? No. Of course not, because it would be counter-productive. A competing blockchain company? Good luck out-doing the creators and visionaries of the technology that understand the in's and out's of it. I will take that bet any day, especially once adoption begins on the iExec network, there will be no way to "copy" it. Same goes for LINK and any other pre-mine utility. Near impossible, too much work, too little reward, too much risk, etc.

[Anonymous No.20260494]

>doracles
RLC fuds itself.

[Anonymous No.20260510]

>>20260455
>He thinks patterns exist
Tell that to LTC holders
>Dozens of poorly worded shill threads
My English is way better than yours Ranjesh.

[Anonymous No.20260528]

>>20260510
Does RLC have any big name adoptees like Link?

[Anonymous No.20260564]

iExec wins the bagholder lottery every time.

[Anonymous No.20260608]

>>20260528
How does LINK sound?
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1223262116318068741
Other then that, how do these companies in the rolling banner sound?
Click them for the articles.
https://iex.ec/roadmap/

[Anonymous No.20260651]

>>20260476
Well this is where I simply don't understand enough yet technically about how this works. What does any premine utility consist of beyond just x lines of code and a name (maybe a copyright)? It seems like you're arguing that a "network effect" exists like in social media. Is this true, and if so, how does it manifest itself technically for a project like this?

[Anonymous No.20260785]

>>20260651
>What does any premine utility consist of beyond just x lines of code and a name (maybe a copyright)?
Because it's an evolving utility backed by a team determined to continually improve the product until it's self sustaining and "version complete". From what I understand iExec isn't open source so no one could technically copy it anyways, and developing on top of what they made would be an extreme feat on its own. iExec is almost at that point of self-sustainability. The next step is adoption(the stage almost in now), and the iExec team being contractors to help giant enterprises get connected(that's how iExec plans to make money, by being the operators for different businesses and stuff).
>See: https://iex.ec/iexec-for-enterprise/

Utility tokens are interesting in that they rely on the network effect over simple economics like Bitcoin has. The network effect is the same as any other, as more users = more network strength = more value. If something with 100 million users exists you are most likely going to use that network, because it is trusted and commonly used. iExec has the first mover advantage in this scenario, as no other blockchain technology exists that offers the same technologies.

[Anonymous No.20260798]

>>20260510
>p-patterns don't exist
LMAO. Oh Ranjesh, you haven't fooled anyone.
Every single RLC shill thread is filled with ESL tier English. It's just brown people shilling digital ghee. You're just some dumb curry cockroach compared to me, but by all means keep pretending to be white. There is a pattern with this shitcoin, a pump and dump pattern which anyone can see if they zoom out.

[Anonymous No.20260822]

>>20260798
I just showed you proof that patterns don't exist. No one could have seen LTC exploding like that.

Hurr durr I'm whiter than you are hurr durr doubt it. I also doubt you're over 6'2 and have an IQ under 120. I can tell because you don't hold RLC and have fudded it for 2 years straight.

[Anonymous No.20260911]

>>20260121
Iexec has patents on some of their technology iirc

[Anonymous No.20260921]

>>20260822
>b-but LTC exploded
At the height of the shitcoin pump and dumps in the last bullrun? Amazing. By drawing this comparison you're acknowledging that there's nothing actually remarkable about this shitcoin. It's just one among many that bent the knee to link at this point after the whole "dOracle" fiasco. I'm not sure if you even understand that though, seeing as you think that 120 IQ is some kind of impressive cutoff point.
>for 2 years straight
That's how long you've been trying to sell those $2 bags back to me for? Jesus, time really does fly.
Post a picture of your hand with a timestamp,. you worthless, shit-eating ape.

[Anonymous No.20260940]

>>20260921
Thanks for conceding that there aren't patterns. Thanks for telling me that your IQ is under 120.
Why should I prove myself to you? You are the biggest faggot on this board.

[Anonymous No.20261006]

>>20260940
>w-why should I prove myself to you? i-i don't want to post my hand just trust me fellow bizrael anon i am whiter than the rest of the pajeets on the telegram sir!
That curry smell is getting stronger, kek.
>thanks for conceding that there aren't patterns
Except I pointed out that there was a pattern, and you've had nothing to say to this. The V dumps are also a pattern. Funny how you're harping on about IQ, yet you don't have the ability to recognize patterns and argue like a bootleg kike, which is basically what a pajeet is anyway.
Keep barking at me. This is entertaining, if nothing else I guess.

[Anonymous No.20261007]

>>20260785
Lol I just realized I (incorrectly) assumed that all these decentralized projects were open source since the big PoW coins that I knew about first all were. That actually explains a lot of what I didn't understand but I'll do more research; just never cared to until now. I actually need more compsci knowledge in general but blockchain is a great impetus anyway.

Just because I like to have context about who certain ideas come from, what is your background in compsci and if not your job, what is? Also what of the big PoW coins do you have a stake in (sounds like you definitely hold some)? Thanks for the logical responses anon, and good luck. WAGMI

[Anonymous No.20261055]

>>20261006
It's not that I don't want to, I don't care to. I am also lazy and dont give a fuck what you think.
>Except I pointed out that there was a pattern
No you didn't Pranjabi.
>>20261007
Indeed. Many make the same mistake, in fact I've seen people say it can just be copied, but they have no clue in reality.
I'm a self taught programmer of sorts but that's all I can really tell you. I don't have to work for a living anymore though, and I'm only 29 years old.
My portfolio is 25% BTC, 20% ETH, 20% LINK, 35% RLC.

[Anonymous No.20261089]

>>20260798
>>20260822
Kek the Dunning-Kruger examples constantly from people who can't distinguish between those who do and don't understand English are always hilarious. Never stop.

[Anonymous No.20261108]

>>20261089
We're probably both white I just really hate that guy. Consistently fuds RLC threads since 2018 or earlier.

[Anonymous No.20261132]

>>20261055
>i-i don't give a fuck what you think
Ah yes, only 52 posts and apparently 95 percent of the RLC shilling on this board comes from a guy who doesn't care about proving himself. Nothing quite like the sound of a cornerned nigger barking. Go on, keep going. Do *anything* but post your hand with a timestamp.

[Anonymous No.20261147]

>>20261132
No, you misunderstood, I care to explain what RLC is to people that want to learn. Not to people like you that are closed minded and fud the projects that are actually worthwhile because they sold too early.

[Anonymous No.20261165]

>>20261089
>the Dunning-Kruger examples constantly from people who can't distinguish between those who do and don't understand English

Dunning-Kruger is definitely in effect with your response. Consider reading the rest of the wikipedia article that you opened up in an attempt to back up your fellow curry cockroach to understand why.

[Anonymous No.20261180]

>>20261147
>i-i just won't prove myself to YOU
Stop being a disobedient nigger and post a picture of your hand with a timestamp for your white master and be done with it.

[Anonymous No.20261191]

>>20261180
Naaaa I'm okay dude don't feel like being nice to you :)

[Anonymous No.20261213]

this guy is basically adolf hitler with a weird arian hand fetish

[Anonymous No.20261231]

>>20261191
You're definitely a pajeet. It's confirmed at this point.
I'll see you next thread I guess, just to piss you off by posting that same image and getting in the way of your swindling.

[Anonymous No.20261246]

>>20261231
Okay man whatever you want to believe.
It's okay I'll have this schizo conversation with you when RLC is 5$ EOM

[Anonymous No.20261368]

Rarely post since it usually turns into low IQ muckraking but happy to see reason-based shilling.

>>20261055
>I'm a self taught programmer of sorts but that's all I can really tell you. I don't have to work for a living anymore though, and I'm only 29 years old.
Good shit; I definitely only see the value of programming increasing.

[Anonymous No.20261387]

>>20261368
Yeah. I'm more into the gaming side of it if that helps you get a bigger picture. I try to do reason-based shilling but often gets met with retarded shit like >>20261231
But what else should I expect on here lol

[Anonymous No.20261536]

>>20261108
>>20261165
>>20261180
Yeah I can see both of you being white but with a 50 IQ difference. Not sure where the nu/pol/ low IQ infestation came from; perhaps just nuDonald posters, the type that jumped on the bandwagon without understanding when Trump was criticizing monetary expansion during his campaign but continued sucking his dick after he reversed policy on everything, etc.

Mr. White KANG I'm too lazy to post hand but I'll save myself the trouble and let you know if I did you would call me a dog-eating chink shill. There's like a 20% chance this other guy is a high IQ pajeet or shitskin or whatever but most likely white. If you took the time to stop being so assblasted and try to learn anything you might stop being poor.

[Anonymous No.20261580]

9300 RLC Chad here.
I have no idea what’s going on.

[Anonymous No.20261614]

>>20261536
Bingo friend.

[Anonymous No.20261693]

>>20261614
Just curious what your political views are. I supported him through his campaign and afterwards but I think he turned out to be essentially a low effort shill, quite disappointing. This country seems pretty lost for our generation and after unfortunately.

[Anonymous No.20261727]

>>20261693
I'm not really into politics. I'd rather have Trump for the taxes though. Democrats want to steal my money.

[Anonymous No.20261794]

>>20261727
Well I think it's likely we'll at least have more money for the Dems to try to steal. This BTC <$10k seems to be really scary for people and they pile into alts. Once $10k breaks cleanly I think we'll have some fun.

[Anonymous No.20261819]

That pump is primed for a massive correction

[Anonymous No.20261853]

>>20261819
There may be a pullback but if BTC doesn't collapse I'd imagine RLC will at least follow.

[Anonymous No.20261867]

>>20261794
Yeah they just want to fuck everything up in regards to capital gains and they can fuck right off.
I agree though we should see some pump soon here.
>>20261819
I disagree, it looks over the top but if you zoom out this pump is nothing.

[Anonymous No.20262139]

I purchased 250 RLC all I can do until next paycheck anyways, hopefully I have time to hit 1,000. I’ll do some more reading into this. Can you give us realistic price by end of 2020/21? Obviously no one can predict the price but just some number that’s actually very possible to be hit and isn’t a meme.

[Anonymous No.20262149]

>>20261819
Its already corrected lol. Its about to leg up and blast into the ether

[Anonymous No.20262394]

>>20260277
Ain't arbitium just working with eth computations?

[Anonymous No.20262750]

>>20252941
Chico?, is that you?

[Anonymous No.20262793]

>>20262750
No but chico and datadash are shilling RLC now
>>20262394
Yea

[Anonymous No.20262813]

>>20262793
So that's where all delusion of link doing same as iexec comes from? People mixing up eth based and hardware computations

[Anonymous No.20262834]

>>20262813
Yeah.

[Anonymous No.20262838]

>>20262793
Chico shilled rlc in jan/feb

[Anonymous No.20262840]

>>20262838
Barely. He is picking it up recently and will shill it again hard before EOM.

[Anonymous No.20262850]

>>20262840
He's actually the reason you know about it and when he shilled, it was dumb cheap

[Anonymous No.20262859]

>>20262850
Huh?
I bought years ago and at every moment I could while it was under ICO price.

[Anonymous No.20262891]

>>20262859
Well, he shilled way before 20, 25 ,30 cents, so...

[Anonymous No.20262905]

>>20262891
Okay? And? I bought some pre 2017 bullrun too. Wanna suck my dick about it?

[Anonymous No.20263093]

>>20262905
Hello sir, what’s your prediction for RLC price EOY 20 and 21?

[Anonymous No.20263125]

>>20263093
EOY 20 - 10$ min
EOY21- 100$ min

[Anonymous No.20263310]

>>20252941
I love RLC, it's a great project. Dont miss out.

[Anonymous No.20263312]

>>20263093
Dear sir such richness awaits whole village will be proud

[Anonymous No.20263328]

>>20253218
Good thing I have 22k. So close to the top 250 wallets haha. Feels good man.

[Anonymous No.20263340]

>>20263312
Planing to start a coffee roasting business so RLC at 100 would definitely help that.

[Anonymous No.20263392]

>>20263340
Smells good to me. RLC's potential is massive
>>20263328
22k is a solid wallet anon. Keep DCAing you will make it soon

[Anonymous No.20263649]

im seeing a disturbing lack of inforgaphs and max character copy pasted shill posts before i dump my life savings in this bad boy

[Anonymous No.20263662]

>>20263649
I'll make sure to up my game tomorrow for ya, i'll post some weird ones

[Anonymous No.20263803]

>>20263392
Yeah, I'm happy with 22k. Trying to get more SNX and LINK before the next leg up.

[Anonymous No.20264076]

>>20263803
Yes 11k will be top then we will move to snx

[Anonymous No.20264090]

>>20252941
I know. I can spot your schizo posting style from a mile away

[Anonymous No.20264249]

>>20252941
Im ready.

[Anonymous No.20264396]

>>20264249
Slow down brother give guys like me a chance mate..

[Anonymous No.20264508]

>>20264396
It is over we moved to 10k

[Anonymous No.20264613]

>>20264508
It's not over, kek. Rank 106 on Coingecko, just saw a higher low, and soon a higher high. If you're not in, get rekt scrub.

[Anonymous No.20264698]

Waiting for the colossal dump to get in.

[Anonymous No.20264706]

>>20264698
Same

[Anonymous No.20264718]

Literal shitcoin enjoy getting scammed

[Anonymous No.20264820]

>>20264706
This coin must have the easiest pattern to follow on Earth. It's literally a huge pump to draw the FOMO in and take a huge dump on them right after it. Repeat indefinitely and you are the next Bill Gates.

[Anonymous No.20264965]

>>20264820
kek, so every coin literally ever? How new are you?

[Anonymous No.20265206]

>>20264090
Not the same guy, this is a larper

[Anonymous No.20265221]

I have over 100k RLC

[Anonymous No.20265236]

Lamo amount of concerned bizlets that try to protect people from scam makes me laugh

[Anonymous No.20265261]

I got 250.. give me one more month I know it’s not fair to ask but let’s stop shilling. Ta

[Anonymous No.20265274]

>>20265236
I'm already up $3k tho, how could I be concerned? topkek.

>Higher low, breakout from down trend, higher high volume, soon higher high.

[Anonymous No.20265288]

This thread is bullish as all fuck

My dick is diamonds

[Anonymous No.20265303]

>All you had to do was listen to my extremely in-depth shilling.

if it were in depth i wouldve read it. I like to get spoonfed details about promising projects. but your shilling is just hyping a garbage coin with no narrative or convincing use case, so i file it with every other coin like that and ignore you.

[Anonymous No.20265802]

>>20265274
All you have to do is look at this chart. easy buy, easy profit.

[Anonymous No.20266095]

>>20265274
This is legit thanks anon

[Anonymous No.20266231]

ITS JUST THE BEGINNING GILLES

[Anonymous No.20266245]

>>20252941
Well that's fucking hilarious.
I'm responsible for like 5% of the VRA posts probably. How much time do you spend on this board?

[Anonymous No.20266249]

Also what's up with Gilles having a PhD in Philosophy?

[Anonymous No.20266369]

I believe Coinbase will come in november

[Anonymous No.20266557]

>>20266369
based on what?

[Anonymous No.20266571]

>>20266557
im guessing based on chico lmao

[Anonymous No.20266782]

>>20266571
Chico might be an utter douchebag, but he's been in the space for a minute, calls out solid gems quite often. I've made a lot of money off his insight. Grain of salt and all that other shit.

[Anonymous No.20266914]

>>20266782
Chico is a fag who had a dildo on the background on one of his live streams and he deleted it fast enough.
Rlc is a tranny coin glad I sold it and got my money back