[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 19 KB, 360x250, 6DAE6476-9D66-4036-8A6E-7D8869E9206D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20173809 No.20173809 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.20173907

>>20173809
It's impossible only brainlets would fall for this bait

>> No.20174059

>>20173907
there are positive integer solutions

>> No.20174142
File: 86 KB, 517x852, keb000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20174142

go fuck yourself.

>> No.20174203

>>20173809

> measuring success dependent on solving a question

Yikes.

>> No.20174204

>>20173809
The answer is "no".

>> No.20174259

>>20173809
this is fucking easy
Why can't you use variables instead of fruits?
>american education

>> No.20174345

>>20174259
Okay then:
a/(b+c) + b/(a+c) + c/(a+b) = 4, where a,b,c > 0 and integers.

If you can't immediately see the issue with those constraints, I can't really help you.

>> No.20174573

>>20174059
What's this called, I want to look it up.

>> No.20174664

>>20173809
It's just algebra. Did 95% of people not go to high school? Maybe middle in some places, fuck man.

>> No.20174694

>>20173809
(1,0,-1)

>> No.20174754

>>20174664
do the demonstration then retard

>> No.20174757

>>20174345
This.
>>20174259
Here you go anon... pic related is the equation simplified for least common denominator.

>> No.20174779
File: 3 KB, 387x42, math.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20174779

>>20174757
pic related

>> No.20174820
File: 120 KB, 1452x794, jeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20174820

having 3 unknowns isnt solvable if you have not 3 equations, that easy. unless you can refactor or eliminate variables

>> No.20174848

>>20173809
wait people on /biz/ can't solve this? holy shit

>> No.20174946

>>20174694
>solution constrained to positive integers

>> No.20175020

>>20174754
Not doing it for free

>> No.20175071

>>20175020
And you shouldn't, because if you manage to find an analytical solution to this problem with the given constraints you'll be famous.
>What are degrees of freedom

>> No.20175132

>>20174820
Its fully solvable but it require insane amount of math skill to do so.

>> No.20175177
File: 15 KB, 388x485, numebrs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20175177

Tried all numbers less than 500, no solutions. Likely impossible, probably some conjecture that says so

>> No.20175233

>>20175177
based

>> No.20175270

>>20175177

Absolutely based. OP BTFO

>> No.20175302

>>20175233

>>20175132
I saw the solution and i can guarantee you will not able to solve this unless you are math professor its a bait picture.

>> No.20175405

>>20175177
Haha based

>> No.20175423

>>20173907
>>20175302
not true, you just have to train up a deep Q-learning network with a self-play mechanism to solve general Diophantine equations. mathematicians BTFO

>> No.20175496
File: 25 KB, 739x213, numbers2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20175496

>>20173809
Found it

>> No.20175529

>>20175496
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2192461/find-answer-of-fracxyz-fracyxz-fraczyx-4

>> No.20175551
File: 500 KB, 500x200, giphy (4).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20175551

>>20175177
>python

>> No.20175631

>>20175496
What the fuck