[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 251 KB, 1101x1964, 3090B9AA-893E-40EF-910E-8D1F7F5E1C1A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20169519 No.20169519 [Reply] [Original]

I cannot believe how well LINK has performed. Is it a “broken clock is right twice a day” thing or did insiders actually leak knowledge to biz?

Anyone have good screen caps of breadcrumbs back from 2017/2018?

>> No.20169543

How about you just go back to plebbit?

>> No.20169574

>>20169519
Don't post anymore of that ugly 5 head nigger. I may never get an erection again.

>> No.20169588
File: 19 KB, 250x359, 1589455131322.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20169588

>>20169519
ARE YOU THREATENING ME?

>> No.20169659

>>20169519
it's demoralising to see these faggots make so much money. They were telling everybody it was a scam in 2018 and i didnt buy because of this.

>> No.20169815

>>20169659
You didn't read the first 4 pages of the white paper?

>> No.20169844

Everything is pumping op. Soon it will all crash as well. But link may still be the best performer.

>> No.20169891

>>20169519
>year is 2017
>browse pol but want to start making money
>find biz
>some guy named Assblaster start shilling link
>buy because good memes
>2020
literally made 200k because i listened to some guy named Assblaster. Still cant believe it.

>> No.20170114

>>20169519
No insider leaks, the insider 99% of the time were a meme. The truth is that it was obvious that LINK was going to be huge if you could read and weren't a complete retard.

>> No.20170240

As LINK buyer with a buying average of 0.4$, Link was a predictable success. Smart contracts on eth were so basic though only be able to use on chain data, that a solution had to be found to give all of eth a chance of adoption. Link was just the best option available to solve this.
So why has this been a "hidden gem"? Cuz 95% of all crypto morons weren't even aware that eth can't do shit for smart contracts without an oracle. They just assumed that eth can utilise all sorts all data already. /biz/ just knew better.

Unfortunately the heavy shilling of LINK and subsequent success lead to now every shitcoin being shilled to hell in the assumption that "as long as I shill it long and hard enough people will buy in cuz they dont want to miss out again". - which effectively put this board in its worst quality ever.

>> No.20170255

>>20169815
why would i read the white paper of a scam?

>> No.20170295

>>20170255
Why did you believe regards here and assume it was a scam instead of checking yourself?

>> No.20170325

>>20170240
name one company that pays Sergei to use the Chainlink network

>> No.20170411

>>20169519
LA CRETURA

>> No.20170414

>>20170325
People's Republic of China

>> No.20170439

>>20170295
because theres thousands of scams here.

>> No.20170477

>>20170325
Name one dlt which is used for anything yet. Its all speculation, but it was predictable that link will gain attention at one point

>> No.20170483

>>20169659
>he got pleb-filtered

>> No.20170557

>>20170325
Why would anyone pay sergey personally?

There are many projects using chainlink oracles already.

>> No.20170574

>>20169891
same

>> No.20170695

>>20169519
>I cannot believe how well LINK has performed
This is because you are dumb

>> No.20170702

>>20170483
fuck off asshole

>> No.20170735

>>20170439
This was the most obvious non scam in existence. Like there is literally not a single thing that would lead a reasonable person to think it is a scam

>> No.20170803

>>20170114
it was a gamble anon. the need for smart contract oracles def made sense, but betting on the 2 man Russian philosopher startup to be the one to succeed was always a risk.

>> No.20170907

>>20169519
Fuck you, OP. I hope you never make it.

>> No.20170981

>>20169659
kek I can’t believe that actually worked. this is the best timeline.

>> No.20171121

>>20169519
You ain't seen nothing yet

>> No.20171478

>>20169519
breadcrumbs? link was actively being shilled in 2017/2018

>> No.20171541
File: 107 KB, 499x499, 1563389053749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20171541

>>20169659
did you fall for the it's just a json parser meme?