Swift is already using Chainlink on Corda

[Anonymous No.19988331]

The 35% of Chainlink tokens used to incentivize node operators is locked in a smart contract and is being used on Corda by Swift. Change my mind.

[Anonymous No.19988342]

Pic related

[Anonymous No.19988370]

Moreover....

[Anonymous No.19988394]

[Anonymous No.19988404]

Sources are as follows:

https://www.securities.io/blockstate-to-add-erc-tokens-to-corda/

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200602005297/en/InterWork-Alliance-Launches-Standardize-Token-Powered-Ecosystems-Worldwide

and

https://www.sdx.com/en/home/careers/jobs/it/2034.html

[Anonymous No.19988411]

>>19988331
>Change my mind.
I wont.

[Anonymous No.19988414]

>>19988331
>>19988342
>>19988370
Yup, this is it. This is what peak delusion looks like.

[Anonymous No.19988418]

>>19988331
link is not erc20

[Anonymous No.19988436]

>>19988414
I wonder if he knows wallets exists with those funds

[Anonymous No.19988446]

>>19988418
What is it then pajeet?

[Anonymous No.19988456]

>>19988418
I honestly don’t give a shit where the price of link goes. I don’t care if it goes to 100$ tomorrow or 5 years from now. All I’m concerned about is having the least amount of black people owning this coin as possible. That is why I FUD this coin. I don’t care if some white reddit faggots get on board because they find out more and more about it before it takes off. If it takes 5 years for link to moon and that means more black people end up selling because they need to buy more pork rinds... then that is the optimal mooning timeframe for me.

And make no mistake all you black linkmarines out there. You will undoubtedly be invited to the yacht party when it happens and I’m personally going to sell 50 or so link to build you your own seperate faucet to drink cheap malt liquor out of on a seperate area of the yacht while the rest of us have a faucet with Grey goose vodka pouring out of it

[Anonymous No.19988461]

>>19988446
erc677 you retarded nufag

[Anonymous No.19988470]

>>19988331
>Change my mind.
No

[Anonymous No.19988484]

>>19988331
As with many things with chainlink it is possible but this isnt ditect evidence that the 350 are going that way
In a weird way if youre wrong its probably because the team have an even better solution in place
They dropped the solution to the global sc scaling problem in arbitrum out of the blue for example

[Anonymous No.19988488]

>>19988461
And what is erc677

[Anonymous No.19988493]

>>19988436
If the wallet’s funds are locked in a smart contract, it wouldn’t look like anything other than a regular ethereum wallet to us.

[Anonymous No.19988503]

>>19988461
Erc677 is an erc20 token you absolute disgusting nufag

[Anonymous No.19988528]

>>19988456
This, fuck niggers.

[Anonymous No.19988587]

>>19988493
In etherscan you can check whether an address is a contract or not

[Anonymous No.19988610]

>>19988484
Why haven’t they used the 350 wallet then? I think they are using it on Corda without us knowing.

If you were trying to incentivize node operators, wouldn’t you use at least some of the funds at the beginning when it’s needed most? It doesn’t make sense.

[Anonymous No.19988611]

>>19988331
it's not retard. the node operators currently providing data get paid out of that stack. Swift is not using chainlink for anything. CLC, Honeycomb. etc. and other insiders are getting that stack distributed directly to themselves

[Anonymous No.19988621]

>>19988331
This is exactly how Assblaster said LINK would be traded by institutions.

[Anonymous No.19988623]

>>19988587
Even if the contract is not on Ethereum? Proof?

[Anonymous No.19988632]

>>19988611
the 350M have been untouched, node operators have been paid out via sergey 50M wallet.

[Anonymous No.19988634]

>>19988331
>35%
aka centralized

[Anonymous No.19988654]

>>19988623
they're not going to lock tokens in a contract on another chain without locking an equivalent amount in a correspondent contract on ethereum

[Anonymous No.19988680]

>>19988632
hurr durr chainlink is literally subsidizing these feeds and admits it

>no it's a different stack this is not what they mean when they say subsidizing node operators

i swear to god this community is too fucking dumb to figure out how to breathe without help

[Anonymous No.19988687]

>>19988632
That’s what I’m saying doesn’t make sense.

[Anonymous No.19988696]

>>19988680
Literal fucking word salad.

[Anonymous No.19988705]

>>19988456
based man.

[Anonymous No.19988712]

>>19988654
Why not? If you were collaborating on a project and had a formal in person contract, you don’t need a smart contract on ethereum. The parties already trust each other.

[Anonymous No.19988742]

It’s xrp

[Anonymous No.19988799]

>>19988331
>ONE YEAR AGO
PRICED IN

[Anonymous No.19988802]

>>19988331
Xrp and link. That's it.

[Anonymous No.19988833]

>>19988802
xrp not an erc token...

[Anonymous No.19988876]

>>19988799
I am aware of the age of that article. InterWork alliance is new. So is the SDX Swift integration job.

[Anonymous No.19988877]

So this is in production already where swift is utilizing millions in link and they are keeping this hidden from the world why

[Anonymous No.19988892]

>>19988877
Nda

[Anonymous No.19988913]

>>19988877
Giving everyone time to secure the network in a private environment before ISO 20022 goes live? Testing on Corda with the intention of eventually transitioning to Ethereum?

[Anonymous No.19988940]

>>19988877
Also gives the banks a chance to set up nodes and get everything going in a trusted environment before they move to a trust less decentralized environment.

[Anonymous No.19988964]

>>19988940
Didn’t Sergey say that everything would start off centralized where institutions already trusted each other?

[Anonymous No.19988979]

>>19988913
>>19988940
It’s too early to test anything without TEE, mixicles, Tsigs etc

[Anonymous No.19988991]

>>19988979
They have TEEs though with town crier, threshold sigs are being finished right now, and arbitrum was gonna scale everything...

[Anonymous No.19988997]

>>19988712
how are the node operators paid

[Anonymous No.19989027]

>>19988997
They are paid in xrpee

[Anonymous No.19989030]

Pic related

[Anonymous No.19989068]

>>19988503
no its not you dumb ignorant faggot.

You just spout falsehoods as if they are actual fact without taking anytime to assess wtf you are even talking about. Did you think to even bother learning about any token standards and proposals to improvements on the erc-20 before you just typed out some retarded shit. You have the intellectual prowess of a snail and you could't think your way out of a paper bag if your life depended on it faggot. KILL YOURSELF!!!!

Pic related!!! You are full of shit!

[Anonymous No.19989067]

>>19988997
Mirrored version of link tokens on Corda. I think they are literally creating parallel networks that will eventually be combined. One public version and one private version for Swift.

[Anonymous No.19989092]

>>19988979
Not if the network is private. In fact a private dlt network makes a perfect place to test these things no?

[Anonymous No.19989107]

>>19988964
yes. theres that post where that anon who is most likely sergey explained that decentralized oracles would fail if not for legacy systems. We have the real world where companies have already built up trust to bootstrap the network.

[Anonymous No.19989111]

>>19989092
I would also argue that Corda was developed into what it is exactly for this purpose by the banks. I can’t prove it though.

[Anonymous No.19989139]

>>19989107
I remember that. Do you have a screen shot?

[Anonymous No.19989147]

>>19989111
good shit my dude.

[Anonymous No.19989230]

Mommy?

[Anonymous No.19989231]

Just want to say thank you to OP and all anons in this thread who posted breadcrumbs
I wouldn’t ever sell anyway, but I appreciate your efforts nonetheless

We’re all gonna make it

[Anonymous No.19989233]

>>19988331
Thanks OP. That's some high quality crumb. So what do you think, Chainlink will be traded on Six or Chainlink will only be used in the process of wrapping security tokens from ETH to Corda?

[Anonymous No.19989279]

>>19989092
This is interesting not gonna lie. I will dig deeper later when i have time

[Anonymous No.19989335]

>>19989279
Read the Corda white paper when you get a chance.

[Anonymous No.19989391]

If all this is true, then link price manipulation makes more sense. Sergey would want to keep the token price in the same range across both networks for a future merge/ swap.

[Anonymous No.19989424]

>>19989233
Probably both I would imagine. SDX is important for bank use because it legally validates Link tokens as securities in Switzerland. If these banks want to use link, they need some sort of okay by a government.

[Anonymous No.19989500]

>>19988611
Wrong. Look at the wallet. It isn’t being used for payouts.

[Anonymous No.19989626]

>>19989391
how does that make sense?
>>19989107
yes i remember, do you have a screenshot or something to research in the archives?

[Anonymous No.19990083]

>>19989424
Makes sense, thanks

[Anonymous No.19990272]

None of that is real. Swift is not using Chainlink and their relationship was severed after the testnet phase ended

[Anonymous No.19990308]

>>19990272
Oh so thats why sirgay can sti put the logo in presentations? Or why the logo is all over smartcontract.com?

[Anonymous No.19990407]

>>19990308
So? They put Chase, HSBC, and bloomberg logos on that site too, there's no partnership with them. He is well known for putting eye catching logos to stretch the truth

[Anonymous No.19990415]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34wiI49iBVI

[Anonymous No.19990454]

>>19990407
Your boypussi is all thats gonna be stretched if you continue the fud anon

[Anonymous No.19990489]

Thanks but if true, wouldn't all the people working on these projects, and the executives above them, mortgaging their houses to buy Link on the open market. NDA or not, will anybody find out?

[Anonymous No.19990500]

>>19990407
If you go through Chainlink job postings, Swift is still being mentioned on some of them. If it was over with Swift, they would have slowly phased it out once they had Google to name drop. They haven’t done that have they?

[Anonymous No.19990507]

>>19990489
lol have you looked at the 3M chart for Link lately? 130% UP

[Anonymous No.19990534]

>>19990489
They don’t know that they are using it is my guess. Swift is calling it something else. The whole Chainlink team wouldn’t even need to know. Only those working on it.

[Anonymous No.19990576]

>>19989230
Plz post original
This was some french billionaires wife right?

[Anonymous No.19990609]

>>19989230
Is that her?

[Anonymous No.19990660]

>>19990489
On average there are 300,000 link withdraw everyday from exchanges

[Anonymous No.19990688]

>>19990576
>>19990609
Yes that's her: Raquel Zimmerman and Charlotte Rampling

[Anonymous No.19990707]

>>19989626
Well if you were going to eventually swap the Corda tokens back into link, you would need the tokens to be close in price right?

[Anonymous No.19990711]

[Anonymous No.19990716]

>>19988331
Priced-in kid...

[Anonymous No.19990734]

>>19988331
bump

[Anonymous No.19990736]

>>19990407
You don’t know that. They all might be using mirrored link on Corda. I’m not saying I’m 100% sure but it would explain a lot of the things that don’t add up when you start to dig.

[Anonymous No.19990763]

>>19990576
I looked through my random image folder but didnt find it sorry anon, im too high and folder too big, but i found this gif kek.
Also the painting is the mona lisa and one of the women infront is blythe "mommy" masters

[Anonymous No.19990773]

>>19990660
I’m sure people will slowly start to catch on and this will happen more and more. But slowly. One by one.

[Anonymous No.19990779]

>>19988331
Chainlink working with every company on earth is already priced in

[Anonymous No.19990792]

>>19989067
>Mirrored version of link tokens on Corda
So the shadowfork is real after all..

[Anonymous No.19990793]

>>19990773
this is why swingies are playing a dangerous game.

[Anonymous No.19990868]

>>19990793
I don’t think they will officially announce until they absolutely have to. But they will announce someday. And swingies are going to be absolutely fucked

[Anonymous No.19990937]

>>19990792

Yes.

>I'm SWIFT and I use Chainlink

[Anonymous No.19991087]

>>19990454
Just trying to adjust expectations to reality

>>19990500
They are legally allowed since they had a proof of concept, but morally they don't have to recruit people without stretching the truth

[Anonymous No.19991116]

>>19990792
It mentions they will migrate 6 ERC20 tokens to R3

Cant find anywhere which 6 tokens and nothing new since July 2019

[Anonymous No.19991145]

>>19988461
You’re a retard
An ERC20 is just a contract base to write off of and use utility functions that have been proven, most notably by way of openzeppelins erc20 contract and extending it to create your own token

An erc20 contract was extended to create erc667 which is uniquely Chainlink

It is still an ERC20 as it follows and is based upon the original open zeppelin standard erc20 contract


Do you regards even solidity

[Anonymous No.19991216]

>>19990868

[Anonymous No.19991341]

>>19990763
No its not
This was a one time post from pol iirc
Cant rememver back story

[Anonymous No.19991468]

>>19988404
there also seems to have been a big pump in the link price on June 27 last year. hmmm

[Anonymous No.19991502]

>>19991087
That’s what I’m saying. I cannot find one other example of Sergey stretching the truth to make Chainlink look good. If he wasn’t still working with Swift, I think he would quietly phase it out. Or change the context to past tense.

[Anonymous No.19991564]

>>19991468
Right because Coinbase listed link at the exact same time Corda announced the Ethereum token integration. Probably not a coincidence.

[Anonymous No.19991591]

>>19991116
One of them is a gold token. Forget where I read it. So that leaves 5.

[Anonymous No.19991697]

>>19990793
If you only swing with 10%, what’s the harm? If the point of swinging with 10% is to just put the profits back into your stack, then it’s a reasonable risk.

[Anonymous No.19991716]

>>19991591
I don’t see anything new on this since July of last year.

[Anonymous No.19991772]

>>19991716
I doubt the people working on this feel the need to keep us updated on their progress. I’m sure they will let us know when they finish everything.

[Anonymous No.19991796]

>>19991697
you know there are people that swing with their whole stack right?

[Anonymous No.19991880]

>>19991796
That little Guatemalan kid who calls himself Finrekt on Twitter swings his hole stack, but that's only because he's got T.gondii.

[Anonymous No.19991901]

>>19991716
Also interesting. Ron Resnick resigned from the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance to found the InterWork Alliance with Chainlink, R3 and SDX.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/cointelegraph.com/magazine/2020/03/19/journeys-in-blockchain-ron-resnick/amp

[Anonymous No.19991905]

>>19991796
That's just playing with fire. But moderate swinging is the best thing one can do during a bear market to increases stack.

[Anonymous No.19991962]

>>19990763
Wtf is happening in this gif?

[Anonymous No.19992044]

>>19991962
Chink dog farts smell awful. He opened the door, gassed her, then held her inside to pontificate his perfume.

[Anonymous No.19992078]

>>19991901
is ETH unironically kill?

[Anonymous No.19992089]

>>19991880
that retard doesn't even have a big stack.

[Anonymous No.19992108]

>>19989391
If this were the case though. With same price range across both networks. Then the price really won’t ever grow too substantially right? All joking aside, think of the ‘Vertical’ meme or the 1000K EOY meme.. By the time to get to this sort of valuation to sustain all the networks (Having to be in ‘sync’) wouldn’t that take ages?

[Anonymous No.19992202]

>>19992108
Not necessarily if the Corda network token price is based on usage. The token price will appreciate rapidly as banks keep on boarding.

Maybe they will figure out a way around this eventually anyway? Or maybe not and link won’t moon until ISO 20022 goes live.

[Anonymous No.19992234]

>>19992202
I think any big enterprise wants to do a pilot test before live. the ones on the corda network are probably just meant to simulate smart contracts and their running it in parrallel with whatever legacy processes they have right now.

[Anonymous No.19992417]

>>19991901
No one CARES. Interwork Alliance, China BSN, Google. Nothing will make your scam moon

Bezos could shill link and it would not budge. Crypto is over

[Anonymous No.19992441]

>>19992234
And it makes you wonder if some enterprises are already / have been /. In this testing and pilot phase since mainnet launched last year. They’re using their own private data and pilot tests plus see how the small players and partners are using Chainlink at the moment.

[Anonymous No.19992473]

>>19988456
My fav copy pasta atm

[Anonymous No.19992893]

>>19991880
Not guatemalan, he;s Honduran, he took sergey to the hotel in La Ceiba, Honduras in 2017.

t. Not Larping

[Anonymous No.19992996]

>>19992893
How do you know this?

[Anonymous No.19993068]

>>19989230
one on the right pls

[Anonymous No.19993082]

>>19992234
This. Corda is private and if mistakes are made, they can be undone. After they iron everything out they will want a public blockchain.

[Anonymous No.19993250]

>>19989626
>do you have a screenshot or something to research in the archives?
https://yuki.la/biz/14514053

[Anonymous No.19993490]

>>19993250
>on the catwalk

[Anonymous No.19993598]

A lot of you are retarded but that’s okay

I wonder why it’s so hard to process that a private blockchain running the ERC Chainlink contract is a stupid ass idea that contradicts everything Sergey aims for

Do you people even listen to Sergey? Or just think “wow high iq listen for buzz words cuz me stupid and hope for moneyz”

[Anonymous No.19993846]

>>19993598
No one said it was permanent. Guess you didn’t read the thread did you?

[Anonymous No.19993894]

>>19993250
Thanks anon. Here is the screen shot...

[Anonymous No.19994157]

>>19991502
What do you think, how does the gpiLINK fits into all of this ?
https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/resources/swift_gpi_link_pr_sdc.mp4

There was a larp not long ago claiming there will be an enterprise fronted tests in Q3 and gpiLINK in Q4. Thread is still in the archives >>19779536

All those connections and breadcrumbs since 2017... SWIFT...Then Chinese president shilling blockchain, BSN partnership right out of the blue... Is it it ? Is Blockchain truly the new internet ? Are they standardizing the new http protocol right in front of our eyes ?

[Anonymous No.19994195]

>>19993250
Based beyond belief, thanks anon.

[Anonymous No.19994199]

>>19994157
well they had to create a multi-layer for the internet, they're doing it now for blockchain.

[Anonymous No.19994387]

>>19994157
I am not a programmer so I don’t know exactly how the token works in Swift gpi link. But I would guess it is programmed in somehow so front end users do not even know they are using cryptocurrency. Users are likely aware of their reputation score as a node but not much else.

[Anonymous No.19994480]

>>19991087

>Traveling to spend time with some family for a few days almost 4 days ago. Stay off /biz for the most part during the visit, been on here too much researching Chainlink. DCA'ed in since late 2017 and through 2018
>Its a couple hour drive so decide to listen to some music in the meantime
>I was just running Youtube through my car system so the easiest thing to click on was previously watched video, Pop Anon We're all in this together.
>On the high way, look down real quick to click play, immediately look up and there is a massive Semi Trailer directly in front of me that just says SWIFT all caps and nothing else

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIlzkQ1J6KU

Yea I'm think we're gonna make it

[Anonymous No.19994555]

>>19994480
were all gonna make it frens

[Anonymous No.19994559]

>>19988456
>grey goose faucet
Subtle comedy gold

[Anonymous No.19994613]

>>19990407
Imagine trying to jew-down such a comfy thread. For shame.

[Anonymous No.19994844]

>>19994480
Absolutely synchronous

[Anonymous No.19994910]

Is link the safest crypto investment besides eth and btc?

[Anonymous No.19995053]

>>19988456
Even if pasta, completely based!

Blacks lack the intelligence to comprehend a smart contract, let alone LINK and don't understand the concept of delayed gratification to make it.

[Anonymous No.19995210]

>>19994480
Beautiful. It's bleeding out into "reality"

[Anonymous No.19995356]

>>19989107
It wasnt sergey, sergey wouldn't misspell sybil
t. author of that post

[Anonymous No.19995445]

>>19994480
Stayed at my dad’s friend’s house the past two weeks. Address was 77. I’m also the anon that received number 7777 at McDonald’s and discovered the oracle of seasons connection while taking a shit at work.

[Anonymous No.19995529]

>>19989139

[Anonymous No.19995623]

>>19995445
Hahaha he poops at work!

[Anonymous No.19995772]

>>19995445

And we come full circle with the pee pee poo poo meme

Given the insane synchronicity I've had over the last 3 years in countless situations I'm relatively sure we in fact live in a simulation of some kind. Idk I legit feel like I can "will" reality sometimes I swear I don't need meds. Lol

[Anonymous No.19995822]

>>19995772
I’m absolutely convinced pee pee poo poo is more than just “shit posting”. Chainlink takes the shit (data) and turns it into gold. Chainlink takes the shit (us) and turns us into millionaires.

[Anonymous No.19995847]

>>19995772
It was 4:56 as I was reading this. Constantly seeing synchronization after discovering this project.

Hodl5evar

[Anonymous No.19996630]

>>19995772
Reality was definitely shadow forked in 2020

[Anonymous No.19996691]

>>19995356
Okay not Sergey. Who are you then?

[Anonymous No.19997462]

>>19994480
>See Suzuki SWIFT
>Logo is basically a hexagon
>Satoshi ->Suzuki

[Anonymous No.19997500]

Corda crumbs

[Anonymous No.19997514]

[Anonymous No.19997533]

[Anonymous No.19997553]

>>19995822
wait till you start saying it out loud

[Anonymous No.19997763]

>>19988342
it’s going to be hedera hashgraph

[Anonymous No.19997779]

>>19988446
fucking retarded nufags, this is why they won’t last in the minecraft endgame

[Anonymous No.19997802]

>>19988456
puerto ricans and dominicans too.

[Anonymous No.19997822]

>>19993490
What the fuck even is this

[Anonymous No.19998032]

>>19997802
TOO LATE ! HA !

[Anonymous No.19998233]

>>19997500
I had forgotten about this. You can’t make the blockchain= hex argument for this either because Corda isn’t blockchain.

[Anonymous No.19998316]

>>19996691
Its the same person responsible for 90% of the high quality non larp threads on chainlink
The word choice and punctuation is always the same
Lurk more

[Anonymous No.19998519]

Take this thread down

[Anonymous No.19998911]

>>19998316
There are more than that, most of them just lurk.

I hope 1 good deed a year anon does well.

[Anonymous No.19999291]

>>19995847
it was 9:11 as I read this

[Anonymous No.19999301]

>>19999291
it's 12:12 as I read this

[Anonymous No.19999426]

>>19999301
12:22

[Anonymous No.20000206]

>>19999301
.

[Anonymous No.20001384]

>>19998233
Checked. And they only use the hexagon logo to symbolise oracles. Also when I made that gif I noticed that the new link logo hexagon fits perfectly into it, the exact same ratio

[Anonymous No.20001985]

>>19995822
>Chainlink takes the shit (data) and turns it into gold.
but isn't that masonic alchemy?

[Anonymous No.20002030]

>>19988456
i like black people fuck you

[Anonymous No.20002560]

>>19990534
This. They see their little part - a dev implementing it understands as much as needed to make it work with their existing system and that's it. Accounts like it because it can lower overheads and speed up transactions but they don't see the higher picture, etc. That is our, the autists, superpower.

[Anonymous No.20002594]

>>19988456
>link is about smart contracts
>Black "people" can't even understand normal contracts

[Anonymous No.20002616]

YOU WILL BE ABLE TO STAKE LINK THROUGH BANCOR VERY SOON LADS

>>20002535
>>20002535

[Anonymous No.20002861]

>>20002560
Thats why this thread is interesting >>19779536 maybe a LARP but could be very very possilbe the frontends are begging in Q3/Q4 and the people involved might see the main backbone code from the chainlink or get to work with the main implementation provider - company named SmartContract - Might be the reason why they recently rebranded the logo... Who knows, its been years of development, two years of private testnet, one year of mainnet, time to extend the testing... it has to come someday

[Anonymous No.20002870]

>>20001985

Yes and we've come full circle twice now

[Anonymous No.20002884]

God Sergey is like a dom Kang when it comes to edging. I've been edging for years and still he won't let me coom

[Anonymous No.20002901]

>>19997779
you are the retarded nufag,literally end your fucking life

[Anonymous No.20002914]

>>19989068
literally how stupid are you? erc677 is built on the erc20 standard. every erc677 token is also an erc20 token KILL YOURSELF

[Anonymous No.20002937]

>>19988446
it’s an erc10 tocken. it got downgraded 10 erc points by the etherum counsil after they find on internet a meme that 4channeler did photoshop sergey in nazi uniform.

[Anonymous No.20002967]

>>19997822
The "who is the most disabled and deserve society's pity" Olympics. That person ended up with 2nd place.

[Anonymous No.20003002]

>>19989068
>>19997779
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/

>Developers describe LINK as “an ERC20 token, with the additional ERC223 'transfer and call' functionality of transfer (address, uint256, bytes), allowing tokens to be received and processed by contracts within a single transaction.”

FUCKING KILL YOURSELF YOU FUCKING NEWFAGGOT

[Anonymous No.20003028]

>>19988331
This is QNT tho

[Anonymous No.20003048]

>>20002914
this
it's an erc667
but that doesn't exclude it being grouped in as an erc20
which is just used to generally describe ethereum tokens
link is an ethereum token
currently
best crumbs I've seen in a while

[Anonymous No.20003504]

bump

[Anonymous No.20003518]

>>20003002
yikes imagine being this upset just because you are wrong, just accept it and move on you'll grow from this.

[Anonymous No.20003541]

>>20003518
1. I was right
2. I am upset about what /biz/ has become youre all a bunch of nufags with <10k link

[Anonymous No.20003572]

>>20003541
no you are not right, link is an erc677 saying its erc20 is like saying iphone is a nokia because both can be used to make a phonecall

[Anonymous No.20003591]

>>20003572
Oh my fucking god. Erc20 is the standard. Every ethereum token is a fucking erc20 token. Chainlink devs themselves say that link is an erc20 token with added functionality.

[Anonymous No.20003603]

>>19991901
This is a good crumb

[Anonymous No.20003613]

>>20003591
"every phone is nokia"

[Anonymous No.20003619]

>>20003613
Every erc677 token is an erc20 token, but not every erc20 token is an erc677 token kill yourself

[Anonymous No.20003642]

>>20003619
no reason to be upset just because you are wrong how will you ever grow when you just can't accept facts, I bet you are american

[Anonymous No.20003647]

>>20003642
The bait is getting too obvious anon

[Anonymous No.20003671]

>>20003642
He's not wrong you stupid mother fucker
You're just trying to sound smart but you don't even know shit
Also I'm glad Sergey is working in America with an American team and selling to the American companies that are going to pump your bags
stupid fuck

[Anonymous No.20003689]

>>20003671
>You're just trying to sound smart but you don't even know shit
I'm not trying to sound smart because I do not care what chainlink does or will do, I've held this shit for 3 years and the only thing I bothered to learn was what kind of token it was and the fact is that its erc677 no matter how many times you call it erc20

[Anonymous No.20003714]

>>19997763
you are a retard

[Anonymous No.20003871]

>>19988331
I will not change your mind. I know that is the truth anon. Singularity is near.

[Anonymous No.20005164]

>>19990407
no more fud anon

[DetectiveAnon !!xywCWEmZbu8 No.20005401]

>>19988331
Its like fucking whack-a-jeet with you shills. I've already debunked this months ago, yet the next week they pretend they never saw anything. Just like what Hitler said about debating jews.

>>/biz/thread/S16766922#p16767141

Here you go. This thread devastated all of you and you've not recovered. Absolutely saturated and dripping in seethery and cope.

[Anonymous No.20005541]

>>19988331
Can somebody please point me to where I could see examples of written smart contracts in code?
A few pages long? I need to understand this whole thing about cryptos and contracts

[Anonymous No.20005595]

>>20005541
Just go to
https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/3.x/

I base all my contracts off of 3.x

[Anonymous No.20005604]

>>20005541
Nigga you're so behind.
ethereum.org has a bunch of em
Or you can look at openzeppelin, they make the library that most smartcontracts rely on.
BTW openzeppelin and chainlink work together, one of chainlink's earliest partners.

[Anonymous No.20005668]

>>20005604
They don’t “work” together in a sense
Open zeppelin did though help with their initial contract audit for security vulnerabilities

[Anonymous No.20006079]

>>20005595
>>20005604
Thanks a lot senpai !

[Anonymous No.20006544]

>>19995822
>Chainlink takes the shit (data) and turns it into gold.

we all know hermes is balls deep in the chainlink team.

[Anonymous No.20006732]

>>19989068
So is it 677 or 667? This graphic says both, and i've seen both frim other sources as well.

[Anonymous No.20006904]

>>20005668
shhhh

[Anonymous No.20006935]

>>20006732
It's not one or the other, but a super-set of functionality. >>19989068 is literally a retard.

[Anonymous No.20006968]

>>20005401
You told us to sell at 0.60

[Anonymous No.20007920]

Here's some more fresh crumbs from today frens.
https://www.coindesk.com/facebook-iotex-and-r3-among-new-members-of-confidential-computing-consortium

[Anonymous No.20008018]

>>20007920
https://confidentialcomputing.io/members/
More of an iExec crumbs
Weird that link is not there since their TEE should be superior

[Anonymous No.20008385]

Highly unlikely OP but thanks for the hopium

[Anonymous No.20008577]

>>19988632
>>19988687

'incentivize node operators' can be read in two ways.
It could be read that the tokens are to be used as an incentive for already existing node operators, or it can be read to incentivize people to become node operators.

if it's the latter it would explain why Sergey's paying the already established nodes from his own wallet.

to my understanding when you start seeing funds being moved from that address is when you know mass adoption has already begun

[Anonymous No.20009065]

>>20005604
What programming language should one learn to properly set themselves up for a smart contract future?