[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 296 KB, 480x480, image1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19528961 No.19528961 [Reply] [Original]

The biggest comeback in crypto... Get in at the bottom or fomo back in at $1, your choice.

>> No.19529046

holy shit you are still bagholding this?

>> No.19529056
File: 1.72 MB, 432x432, image0.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19529056

I will request a lambo in a year or two.

>> No.19529084
File: 329 KB, 500x500, image2-2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19529084

>>19529046
The team is getting things done. Request will be THE decentralized invoicing standard. They're shifting towards a product focused approach and are contacting hundreds of businesses. This will go beyond its previous ATH.

>> No.19529094

>>19528961
Market cap is too high at $10m for such vapor. I'd buy if it was $100k.

>> No.19529095

>>19528961
is there even anybody still working on this project?

>> No.19529153

>>19529094
Maker and multis don't think it's vaporware. The project is gaining traction. Don't miss out because you're salty about the 2018 price drop.

>> No.19529232

>>19529046
fpbp

not buying your bags OP

>> No.19529240

>>19529153
>he thinks WE'RE salty
i didn't buy this garbage to begin with, retard

>> No.19529271

This had me financially ruined

>> No.19529274

>>19529240
Great, then you can get in now ;)

>> No.19529289

It's dead anon let it go

>> No.19529306

>>19529271
It will do the opposite for me, but I understand that you might have negative feelings because of the price action.

>> No.19529400

>>19529289
It's very much alive and it's gaining momentum. The turning point is now. It's not going to be fast money but it's going at least 100x the next couple of years.

>> No.19529467

>>19528961

What is dis even?

>> No.19529474

Held this a long time ago, I think I sold before the major dump but don't remember.
Thanks OP you got me exited to throw 20bux at it to see where it goes from here :D

>> No.19529590

>>19529474
That'll be about 5k come 2022

>> No.19529607

>>19528961
I REQUEST

MY FUCKING MONEY BACK

>> No.19529648

>>19529607
The team made some poorly timed mistakes and good announcements were shat upon by bitcoin dumps. This created the opportunity we are faced with today, a very oversold coin with a solid project behind it.

>> No.19529680

>>19529648
kek

team holds most of the supply.
this will never be an interesting investment.

>> No.19529702

>>19528961
anon i....

>> No.19529726

Biz still doesn't get the concept "buy low, sell high". People who have been in this game long enough know that buying REQ at these levels could be a very smart play, given there is a rise in volume.

>> No.19529793

>>19529726
yes, true, it can be a smart play, however., it can also stay at the bottom while all the rest moons. which is likely too. want to know why?

REQ fucked over their ico investors
REQ fucked up the project, they delivered a fucking javascript library, for 40 million dollars
They ate Pizza in Singapore. Mozarella pizza.

I'll be honest, I had REQ too at one point. until they released their product. I instantly saw it was shit. it market cap should be like 1 million or less. that's how shit it is

>> No.19529835

>>19529793
>REQ fucked over their ico investors
yeah? no
>REQ fucked up the project, they delivered a fucking javascript library, for 40 million dollars
you have no idea how much hard regulatory work was going on in the background
>They ate Pizza in Singapore. Mozarella pizza.
that's the only valid fud

>> No.19529868

>>19529835

they did fuck over their ico investors. I know cause in the ol' days they were mass selling cause the team had secretly been selling req with discounts too. and they dumped that. and then the ico investors dumped. thats when they fucked the first round of ico investors. mind you the ICO price for 1 REQ was $0.08.


Then later, during the bearmarket they decided to fuck over investors again and sold a big amount of REQ when the price was down to 10 cents from $1.15. imagine that.


It's over ... Tornado.. its over. REQ will never recover.

>> No.19529922

>>19529868
Read up on current progress and what's in the pipeline. I can assure you it's exciting, as are the EPC ties and the multis integration. Or even Gilded. The seeds have been planted, now watch the tree grow.

>> No.19530594

>>19529922
I might buy a bag to sell later but i'll never hold.

>> No.19530620

financially ruined

>> No.19530623

50% REQ 50% LINK but thinking of selling some of my LINK

>> No.19530656

>>19530594
fag

>> No.19530670

What's the value proposition here?
Where we headed? And more importantly WHY?

>> No.19530695

>>19530594
degenerate

>> No.19530717

>>19528961
its that mod from the reddit

he has shilled nonstop since release. i respect his commitment

hello abstract
you fat fuck

>> No.19530782

>>19530717
AbstractTornado! oh the good ol' days.

>> No.19531052
File: 271 KB, 1242x1430, 1525489477979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19531052

Ambrosus $100 eoy

>> No.19531103

Can I request my money back?

>> No.19531169

>>19531103
I don't think so. I've asked many times to request my money back but they never did

>> No.19531293
File: 52 KB, 1092x816, 1474949534382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19531293

>>19529084
>The team is getting things done

The team have still not delivered on the initial ICO promises from 2017.

Putting money of communist, French FUCKS was the worst mistake of my life.

>> No.19531340

>>19529835

REQ absolutely fucked over token holders. They basically made no attempt to give the token value, and shit on ICO investors by using it as a personal piggy bank.

Was the ICO a not-for-profit donation?

>> No.19531411

>>19530717
It's not, he's barely active.

>> No.19531484

>>19531293
The first roadmap was way too ambitious. But as I said, past mistakes. It is a good opportunity now, when the products are launched they will add value to the token beyond burning and speculation. If they had staking, it would have had low returns because there just wasn't enough usage. Governance? There was nothing to govern. However, these things will be added and when they are I'll have a fat stack and big profits.

>> No.19531533

Uniswap and Aave are basically just REQ with a working product. Those two apps are doing what REQ was supposed to. How could REQ ever achieve a comeback?

>> No.19531618

>>19531533
You do not understand request or what it entails. It is about invoicing, bookkeeping and smart payments. It was integrated into multis (crypto business banking) recently.

Uniswap is a liquidity provider and Aave is a borrowing and lending platform, how are either tied to request's many use cases? Except for you trying to bring them up in an unrelated thread of course.

>> No.19531630
File: 29 KB, 650x590, 1583810843878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19531630

>>19528961
dont need to get in still have 2017 bags

>> No.19531652

>>19531618
Not sure if ironic shitposting

>> No.19531685

>>19531652
You're the shitposter, you haven't backed up your claim at all.

>> No.19531795

>>19529084
>contacting hundreds of businesses
hold the fucking phone ladies and gentlemen. they're CONTACTING HUNDREDS OF BUSINESSES as we speak. I contacted THEM from my business in 2018 but they didn't even reply to the fucking email. you posted two retarded images in a row and this is your best shill? I'm triggered. You or one of your trannies better give me a better shill than that right fucking now or I'll give my nephew 100 bucks to relentlessly fud this shit for a year
t. mozzarella pasta expert

>> No.19531821

They still have the funds to sponsor their mozzarella adventures?

>> No.19531846

>>19530594
incel

>> No.19531854

REQ is the reason my LINK dca is $6.65

>> No.19532084

>>19528961
$1 when?

>> No.19532253

>>19532084
1-2 years probably.

>> No.19532292

>>19532253
>1-2 months probably.
ftfy

>> No.19532467
File: 38 KB, 499x338, 1581106865833.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19532467

>>19531618
>You do not understand request

Neither do any of the French communist fucks"developing" it.

I also believe they're currently performing a soft exit scam, shutting down comms, winding down their fake progress updates etc.

>> No.19532547

>>19532467
>Muh exit scam

Yeah wow they're rolling out new products and integrations what an exit scam 10/10

>> No.19532604
File: 108 KB, 1241x1269, 1580577741411.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19532604

>>19532547

They've rolled out partnerships and integrations with Wikimedia, PwC, Bee Token (lol) etc etc.

Where have those all gone?

>2017+3
>Partnership scams
>You

How can one be so new, retarded or conniving?

>> No.19533215

>>19532604
>Products
>Integrations

Why are you talking about partnerships?

>> No.19533535

hey retards

theres a reason they're not delisted off binance.

>> No.19533631

ITT: idiots who will stay poor when REQ moons

>> No.19534320

REQ? LMAO you discord cunts are getting desperate aren't you?
Come on guys at least have the self respect to pick some shitcoin sanjay special flavour of the month but trying to shill fucking REQ holy FUCK this is sad wtf are the team even doing anymore tracking fucking SHRIMP?

>> No.19534531

>>19534320
Or maybe... This isn't a discord pump and dump thread?

>> No.19534898

>>19534531
Youre right its just going to be a dump and dump thread LOL

>> No.19535011

They said in an AMA they are not going to do anything for the token. They scammed investors plain and simple. And yes I hold Req but only a small bag thank god

>> No.19535389

>>19531795
I sent him half an ETH. get fucked faggots

>> No.19535584

Token burn going parabolic. Get in or stay poor forever

https://reqtokenburn.com

>> No.19536173
File: 158 KB, 1919x1433, IMG-20200605-WA0003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19536173

>>19535584
Well, the site hasn't updated in months, so that's that. It's missing all data since march due to the V2 app migration I think.

>> No.19536617

>>19532292
Based