Is this boolish for chainlink?

[Anonymous No.19380844]

https://www.publish0x.com/greenbull/chainlink-is-on-a-hiring-spree-a-sign-that-gives-me-more-con-xkkyegj

[Anonymous No.19380884]

>>19380844
>Posting an article by someone called Da_Sound
This is a new low even for /biz/

[Anonymous No.19380914]

>>19380844
Yes I’m so happy sergey is hiring new people, when his company makes $0 in revenue so he has to dump on his loyal investors devaluing their investment by increasing the circulating supply of his already worthless token. What is sergey going to do after he dumps all the remaining tokens? Dissolve the company? Not like it matters because he’s been on his own payroll. How do they plan to make real money?

[Anonymous No.19380958]

Yes, I'm sure they aren't "hiring" all their buddies to help them embezzle the proceeds of their routine token dumps

[Anonymous No.19380964]

>>19380914
>>19380884
I hope you’re just pretending

[Anonymous No.19381005]

>>19380914
You literally have no idea what chainlink is, like, at all

[Anonymous No.19381012]

>>19380844
Literal who author on literal who website

[Anonymous No.19381160]

>>19381005
Honestly I hadn't thought of that, how will the chainlink team create revenue other than by selling their stack?
t.2018 linker

[Anonymous No.19381222]

>>19381160
Ohh Ranjeet, you so crazy.

[Anonymous No.19381237]

>>19381005
You literally have no idea what chainlink is, like, at all

[Anonymous No.19381325]

>>19381160
They have the ability to hire the best of the best. Business wise they are going to be impossible to topple with the network they have in place.

[Anonymous No.19381770]

>>19380844
bullish? are you a retard? people are leaving chainlink so they need new employees fucking retard

[Anonymous No.19381781]

>>19381770
Who has left apart from Dimitri who wanted to code random shit on the side?

[Anonymous No.19381821]

>>19380964
Hey stupid they aren’t. You are an idiot if you own chainlink

[Anonymous No.19381968]

>>19381325
No shit, but how will they be able to leverage that for profit? I'm not trying to fud just curious.
>>19381222
Fuck you bitch, checked

[42 No.19382104]

>>19381222

[Anonymous No.19382133]

>>19381968
They own a huge amount of LINK tokens still

In my opinion the best way forward is when LINK moons they always retain at least 50-100m LINK and stake that to receive income. That way their interest remain alligned with LINK holders

[Anonymous No.19382154]

>>19380844
And you are paying for it by buying his tokens he made out off thin air.

Sergey is a genius.

[Anonymous No.19382189]

>>19381968
The reserves are it - they're sitting on a massive warchest that will last them decades. If you were here early you'd know that the network was originally going to have a fee that would go to the team. Now the network becomes a public good. The team and us get rich yes, but two things can be true at the same time. This allows them massive room to expand and grow as they wish.

[Anonymous No.19382190]

>>19382133
ahh.. of course, they'll just stake their massive stack and get a huge revenue stream just from that. That makes sense. Still seems a little weird if that turns out to be their only revenue stream but at least it's something. I feel like they'd have another way of profiting off the network but beyond staking I can't really think of another way.

[Anonymous No.19382197]

Version 0.8.3. Pre revenue piece of shit 2 1/2 years after ICO. Literally no reason to not use CL right now... it’s fcking free to onboard. Would u use goggle if it wasn’t free? Once it cost the contract creators money to use link, watch the partnerships drop. Zero income. All that ico and 700k dump money to hire more people. Greedy ass basters

[Anonymous No.19382220]

what happens to chainlinks war chest if bitcoin tanks to 1k? will they be able to afford all their new hires, and fancy offices?

[Anonymous No.19382243]

>>19382220
why do you think the war chest would be valued entirely in crypto? you are aware of the 700k dumps right? that adds up to a LOT by now.

[Anonymous No.19382260]

>>19382243
That's a lot of Big Macs.

[Anonymous No.19382287]

>>19382243
wait, they're dumping on chainlink holders?? why is no one talking about this?

[Anonymous No.19382303]

>>19382287
What part of zero revenue is confusing? Zero.

[Anonymous No.19382312]

>>19380914
>company makes $0 in revenue
>doesn't understand business

[Anonymous No.19382318]

>>19382303
>>19382287
>>19382260
>I didn’t read the white paper because I’m stupid!

[Anonymous No.19382442]

>>19382318
Fucking retard. Until contract creators start to get charged for the data they want to trigger the contract. Zero income, zero revenue. Node operators are getting paid by Sergey right now, not the contrac creators. Yes mother fucker, with your ico and 700k dump money.

[Anonymous No.19382454]

>>19380844
Basically reddit tier shilling. Do they also have a new website and made a new millstone graphic after their picnic with mozzarella?

[Anonymous No.19382462]

>>19382442
>Until contract creators start to get charged for the data they want
>Node operators are getting paid by Sergey right now, not the contrac creators. Yes mother fucker, with your ico and 700k dump money.
Chainlink users are being charged right now.
See pic.

>Zero income, zero revenue.
Chainlink was never meant to produce income or revenue for the team.

[Anonymous No.19382494]

>>19382442
Exactly.
https://twitter.com/Brianhkerr/status/1265280661666971648

[Anonymous No.19382496]

>>19382462
I see, so linkteam gets a couple billion dollars, and perhaps residual income from staking, but beyond that they'll just be happy from having created something that is a public good? I guess I could buy that.

[Anonymous No.19382526]

>>19382496
The tokens allotted to themselves at ICO are all the money they will ever have.
Other than running a node themselves like anyone else, there's zero income for the team designed into the system.

[Anonymous No.19382550]

>>19382462
Only Kyc nodes are getting paid. By Sergey. Free onboarding, free to the end user. Sergey is subsidizing the nodes with your money, for network growth. Until we get v1.0, we all just speculators here. Read the fcking white paper. CL team gets a small % of the staking reward after v 1.0

[Anonymous No.19382561]

>>19381821
One of those idiots that went 30x in a bear market.

[Anonymous No.19382565]

>>19382526
Read the white paper. They get cut of all staking rewards. CL is a oracle marketplace, they don’t run nodes themselves

[Anonymous No.19382579]

>>19381237
You literally have no idea what chainlink is, like, at all

[Anonymous No.19382616]

>>19382565
Why would I read the white paper when fine gentlemen like you are around to spread your wisdom?

[Anonymous No.19382636]

>>19382526
>>19382496
Again, the team owns a load of chainlink.

They 100% benefit from chainlink being utilised

[Anonymous No.19382646]

>>19382550
>Only Kyc nodes are getting paid.
Wrong.
There are non-kyc nodes running jobs right now and getting paid just like the other nodes.

>free to the end user
That is entirely up to the companies using Chainlink, who do pay to use Chainlink; see >>19382462
and pic related.

>>19382550
>Read the fcking white paper. CL team gets a small % of the staking reward after v 1.0
>>19382565
>Read the white paper. They get cut of all staking rewards.

Please quote the white paper where it says that.

[Anonymous No.19382654]

>>19382636
>They 100% benefit from chainlink being utilised
Obviously.

[Anonymous No.19382662]

>>19382565
Completely incorrect. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.19382780]

>>19382565
>>19382550
Still waiting for you to quote where the white paper says CL gets a cut from all staking rewards.