Congestion

[Anonymous No.19053846]

WeatherSV needs to stop littering the BSV mempool!

WTFFFFFFFF

[Anonymous No.19053873]

>>19053846
>Congestion
>BSV

No. Segshitters get fucked.

[Anonymous No.19053879]

>>19053846
Fucking lmao

[Anonymous No.19053886]

>>19053873
bases

[Anonymous No.19053894]

>>19053873
kek, imagine being the faggot who actually wrote out this plea. Truely pathetic what normie BTC fans have become.

[Anonymous No.19053909]

>>19053846
>littering the mempool
fuck off segwit shitter, satoshi invented BTC as a decentralized alternative to the weather channel, this is the true Satoshi Vision.

[Anonymous No.19054382]

>>19053909

[Anonymous No.19054421]

>>19053909
>decentralized alternative to the weather channel, this is the true Satoshi Vision.

[Anonymous No.19054451]

>>19053846
Nice try FUD. But you failed to mention Why. Protip, you cant. Pic related, 309mb block

[Anonymous No.19054652]

>>19053846

It's to predict climate change.

Could be useful in case of cataclysm

But no, simpletons don't understand the value of that.

What does btc do again? Oh, that's right basically NOTHING

[Anonymous No.19054686]

>>19054451
>million tx block

[Anonymous No.19054728]

>>19053846
>300mb block
i hope craig bans these fucking weathersv assholes...
how could anyone hope to run their own node? its a basic attack....

[Anonymous No.19054798]

>>19054728
BSV has the ability to value all information. Thats the point of big blocks hurdurr. Most of the transactions atm are uncategorized so there is that too. Build an ecosystem on bsv and you will broadcast transactions.. which was the point of bitcoin and when it began, temporary (now cucked 1mb) block sizes. Btc is a manipulated chinese pump and dump scheme. 1Gb blocks within reach now.

[Anonymous No.19054850]

>>19054728

[Anonymous No.19054873]

>>19053846
good to see BitCoin scaling up

[Anonymous No.19054914]

>>19054728
> how could anyone hope to run their own node? its a basic attack....
shhhhh they think it’s totally fine to have a total of 10 full nodes on amazon aws

[Anonymous No.19054960]

>>19054914
define node >>19054850

[Anonymous No.19054982]

>>19054451
This is business, something biz forgot because of memes.

TAAL and Weather made a deal.
Soon it would be used by academia. People that pay to publish papers and databases.

You just know it first biz. You just have, like always, more time in your wallet.

[Anonymous No.19054991]

>>19053846
no, clogging the mempool exponentially until you can no longer sync or confirm anything is good, it's satoshi's vision and it's how bitcoin is intended to be, no sync, just clog

[Anonymous No.19054996]

>>19053846
invest in bitcoin laxatives right now

[Anonymous No.19055028]

>>19054960
a) define decentralization
b) what kind of consensus is used to discuss and approve bsv protocol changes? craig farts?
bsv is a centralized double shitfork

[Anonymous No.19055611]

>>19054728
BSV nodes are collapsing with no survivors they bleed nodes every week.

[Anonymous No.19055690]

>>19055611
Yes I agree, # of nodes is the 1st most important metric. Everything after that is almost take or leave.

[Anonymous No.19055751]

>>19053909
sensible lel

[Anonymous No.19055791]

>>19055028
>centralized
define centralized

[Anonymous No.19055810]

>>19055611
what you think a node is isn't a node >>19054850

[Anonymous No.19056304]

>>19055810
Too many brainlets here

[Anonymous No.19057548]

>>19053846
>OH NO NO BITCOIN WORKS LIKE ITS SUPPOSED TO SELL SELL SELL

[Anonymous No.19057660]

>>19053846
in the end there will be 5 full nodes/pools only. just use a normal database

[Anonymous No.19057671]

>>19055791
decentralized means independently verified by the majority of the network, including non-mining node so that malicious mining and non-mining nodes CANNOT force protocol violations (e.g. utxo coin seizure) and all attacks are detected properly
consensus means a proposal (BIP) is put on a table and discussed by many developers, and it can be improved, approved or rejected, and then finally accepted or not by majority of miners
let me explain how it works with BSV instead: craig wakes up in the morning, take a shit and single handedly decides what stupid random OP_CODES to include or not on the next fork, what parameters to use, without any BIP, without any consensus, and all decisions are forced by this single moron
since spam on the network is accepted, the blockchain will grow stupidly big and full nodes will decrease to double digits (or even single digit at some point) in no time, leading to centralization
the few bsv nodes remaining will run on third party datacenters (e.g. amazon aws) directly controlled by craig, so he can abuse and violate the protocol at his own willing

[Anonymous No.19057699]

>>19057671
>verified by the majority of the network, including non-mining node
non-mining nodes dont verify anything
kek you corecucks are so funny with your horseshit that was literally all dismantled three years ago

[Anonymous No.19057742]

>>19057699
>non-mining nodes dont verify anything
yes they do, my full (non-mining) node is dropping and not forwarding invalid blocks
stop repeating bullshits and precompiled shill phrases, you are a tech illiterate and a moron
you can verify it by yourself
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin

[Anonymous No.19057759]

>>19057742
lol non-mining nodes only prescreen blocks before they are headed to mining nodes who actually verify transactions. they could all be turned off and it wouldnt affect the network at all. you fell for stale 2017 memes edumucate yourself about how bitcoin actually works. the only nodes that matter are full nodes as defined in the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.19057777]

>>19057759
non-mining nodes can be full nodes moron

[Anonymous No.19057855]

>>19057742
if I have 1 trillion non mining nodes and 1 mining node the mining node determines the next block regardless of what non mining nodes do.
That is because non mining nodes have no hashpower.
Bitcoin is proof of work not proof of stake

how about you read >>19054850

[Anonymous No.19057877]

>>19057742

[Anonymous No.19057893]

>>19057855
now repeat again with me
>Bitcoin Core checks each block of transactions it receives to ensure that everything in that block is fully valid—allowing it to trust the block without trusting the miner who created it.
>Bitcoin Core checks each block of transactions it receives to ensure that everything in that block is fully valid—allowing it to trust the block without trusting the miner who created it.
>Bitcoin Core checks each block of transactions it receives to ensure that everything in that block is fully valid—allowing it to trust the block without trusting the miner who created it.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp
>>19057777
digits confirm

[Anonymous No.19057920]

>>19057777
no they cant read the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.19057924]

>>19057893
read the whitepaper you moron.

Non mining nodes do absolutely nothing

[Anonymous No.19057986]

>>19057920
>>19057924
>muh read the whitepaper
read the code retard
it does exactly what i said
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/src/validation.cpp

[Anonymous No.19058050]

>>19057986
>non-mining nodes can be full nodes moron >>19057777

no they can't

they can't collects new transactions into a block.
they can't work on finding a difficult proof-of-work for a block.
They can't express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the
chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash.

[Anonymous No.19058067]

>>19058050
READ THE FUCKING GODDAMN CODE OR SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR GULLIBLE PAJEET FAQ SHILL ANSWERS

[Anonymous No.19058080]

>>19058067
no arguments
>>non-mining nodes can be full nodes moron
no they can't >>19058050

[Anonymous No.19058084]

>>19053873
>a literally who on reddit speaks for all btc users
fuck off streetshitter.

[Anonymous No.19058093]

>>19058080
>no arguments
code is not an opinion
code is code

[Anonymous No.19058099]

>>19057924
>Non mining nodes do absolutely nothing

...and bsv has no miners mining it either. Sad!

[Anonymous No.19058109]

>>19058067
>>19058093
t. retard

[Anonymous No.19058112]

>>19057671
>craig wakes up in the morning, take a shit and single handedly decides what stupid random OP_CODES to include or not on the next fork
craig has never coded a single line of BSV's code
he can't code C++ and he can't do e.c. cryptography, he wouldn't know where to start

[Anonymous No.19058117]

>>19058093
there is nothing in the code that makes non mining nodes able to:
collect new transactions into a block.
work on finding a difficult proof-of-work for a block.
express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the
chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash.

non mining nodes can not be full nodes

[Anonymous No.19058122]

>>19057777
it's called UASF retard
miners don't control shit, that's why your bitmain stunt failed and crashed face first into the ground

[Anonymous No.19058134]

>>19057924
>>19058122
>>19058117
you don't really understand lmao
coinbase's node is worth more for the consensus than any chinese node
and antminers do not run full nodes

[Anonymous No.19058135]

>>19058099
wow must be a lot of people that would fall for that one

[Anonymous No.19058145]

>>19058122
>>19057855

>>19058134
are you false flagging?
Bitcoin is proof of work

[Anonymous No.19058153]

>>19058117
it's the same exact code, just with hashing power zero because you did not enable it, but they still verify if a block is invalid and reject it without forwarding it to other nodes, so they are actively participating in the network
>Bitcoin Core checks each block of transactions it receives to ensure that everything in that block is fully valid—allowing it to trust the block without trusting the miner who created it.
the level of cope for bsvtards is impressive

[Anonymous No.19058169]

>>19058153
they participate in the network the same way someone watching a tennis match on tv participates in the game

>non mining nodes can not be full nodes
a full node is defined here >>19058050
you are wrong

[Anonymous No.19058187]

>>19058169
wrong, they are actively judging if the tennis match is being played correctly, and if you try to score invalid points they just ignore you

[Anonymous No.19058193]

>>19057877
but you cant use BTC as electronic cash with shitty block sizes and unrealistic fees.

[Anonymous No.19058217]

>>19058187
also the same as saying not participating i.e have no affect on the game.

>>19058193
btc isn't bitcoin; it's digital gold that doesn't have a chain a signatures, a btc node doesn't need to have hashpower and you need to run a non mining node to verify blocks
all contrary to the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.19058245]

>>19058217
>cristiano ronaldo (miner) scores a goal (block)
>referee (nodes) says it's invalid and cancel it
no goal scored
it's easy to understand

[Anonymous No.19058271]

>>19058245
>non mining nodes can change the blockchain
no they can't >>19057855

[Anonymous No.19058306]

>>19058271
non mining nodes are not inserting invalid blocks at all, they will include the valid ones from some other correct miner
if you act maliciously and continue on your own with an invalid block, you are on your own, alone
otherwise miners would spam the network with invalid blocks and get free block rewards
again, it's very easy to understand

[Anonymous No.19058323]

>>19057855
>if I have 1 trillion non mining nodes and 1 mining node the mining node determines the next block regardless of what non mining nodes do.
BULLSHIT
if the block is invalid, nobody will accept the block and the miner will be on his own just wasting time
otherwise every miner would act maliciously
it's fucking game theory

[Anonymous No.19058362]

>>19058306
non mining nodes can do nothing against miners.
if all non mining nodes disagree with majority hashpower the blockchain doesn't change.
Bitcoin is proof of work you moron

>>19058323
>non mining nodes don't accept a block
absolutely nothing changes on the blockchain

[Anonymous No.19058374]

>>19053846
>one of THE most used apps on BSV is a centralized oracle

[Anonymous No.19058391]

>>19058362
>non mining nodes can do nothing against miners.
yes they can
they can distinguish between good and malicious miners
>if all non mining nodes disagree with majority hashpower the blockchain doesn't change.
WRONG, they will accept valid blocks even if the hashrate of good miners is lower than malicious power ones
>non mining nodes don't accept a block
>absolutely nothing changes on the blockchain
correct, until a good miner steps up and mine a valid block

[Anonymous No.19058425]

>>19058391
>they can distinguish between good and malicious miners
that is not taking an action against miners
> they will accept valid blocks even if the hashrate of good miners is lower than malicious power ones
is not changing the blockchain. to vote you need hashpower. Proof of work you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.19058553]

>>19058425
hashpower only matters when you have miners following the protocol without violation but doing nasty (but valid) things like re-orgs while trying to takeover the blockchain
But cost of detecting protocol violations is very low, just some wasted bandwidth and a crypto verification and non mining nodes are doing this