/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.19034357]

Satoshi Nakamoto is a CIA glow nigger.


I feel betrayed, time to go all in precious metals.

[Anonymous No.19034413]

you should do it

[Anonymous No.19034418]

>>19034357
One era of crypto is coming to a close it seems. The very essence of the ideology behind Bitcoin has been corrupted and hijacked by the very people whom gave birth to the whole movement.
It is truly a sad moment right now, but I believe a new crypto era will arise from these ashes, stronger than before, based on the true values and ideas of the early day cypherpunks.

[Anonymous No.19034439]

>>19034418
>the ideology
this is the problem.

reality does not require an ideology.

[Anonymous No.19034450]

>>19034439
yeah ideas are free to form and change while ideology is dogmatic reactionary conservative and the opposite of progress.

[Anonymous No.19034468]

>>19034357
>CIA glow nigger
he is a cyberpunk you goddamn retard

[Anonymous No.19034469]

>>19034357
The irony of Bitcoin is that it's become centralized and full of censorship

[Anonymous No.19034475]

>>19034357
i can only hope that this adam back is satoshi is only a campaign to rile up the creggies and sv cucks. but it's entirely possible a lot here are retarded.

[Anonymous No.19034488]

Banned and censored from Reddit, kek. It must be legit

https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/ghoqju/bitcoin_unmasking_satoshi_nakamoto/

[Anonymous No.19034490]

>>19034469
if you mean by that centralized services (like exchanges and forums) loosely tied with bitcoin by association are centralized and full of censorship then big surprise... as for bitcoin itself you are a moron if you think so.

[Anonymous No.19034499]

what happened that the shills started this new narrative?

[Anonymous No.19034504]

>>19034488
of course... that's not a fallacy at all anon. good job not looking like a retard.

[Anonymous No.19034507]

>>19034357
SN is NS: Nick Szabo
Also, BTC is part of the plan and will make relatively early adopters relatively wealthy:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jfx7PnMtCeY

[Anonymous No.19034513]

>>19034450
>>19034475
>>19034490
>>19034504
Redpill me on this guy bros

[Anonymous No.19034516]

>>19034499
dunno but i bet adam is secretly enjoying it. he always wanted to be a somebody.

[Anonymous No.19034524]

>>19034513
it's strawberry flavor

[Anonymous No.19034530]

Watch this video retards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g

[Anonymous No.19034535]

>>19034524
ah found it... here is the real red pill!

[Anonymous No.19034573]

>>19034439
>>19034450
I don't quite get what you're saying.
What I'm trying to say is that it's sad to see the corruption that greed and power has brought upon Bitcoin. We are very far gone from the initial days of Bitcoin and the core principles of which gave birth to it. "Progress" is always subjective.

[Anonymous No.19034576]

i think the info in the first half of that vid is way more important than the stuff about satoshi's identity, but it will get more attention with satoshi in the title. blockstream parasitized the bitcoin movement and successfully took it over, and the info about what happened was severely suppressed and fudded. great to see it all being laid out in a video like that
in summary, bitcoin core is still dominant but a lot of people are going to learn about the shady company that took it over and that might lead to more people recognising bitcoin cash as a valid alternative
bitcoin SV is still a hilarious scam with an incompetent fat cunt at the helm
bitcoin cash is closer to what bitcoin should be, but it has very powerful suppression and fud efforts keeping it down and probably never will take off due to that, however if enough people learn about what that video talks about, it might gain more traction.
really makes u think

[Anonymous No.19034594]

the archive makes it easy to see how all this unfolded on /biz/ when it happened
>>/biz/?ghost=yes&search_op=op&search_res=post&task=search2&search_ord=old&search_text=blockstream

[Anonymous No.19034605]

>>19034573
>I don't quite get what you're saying.
you don't see ideology getting entrenched on the scaling war sides deeper and deeper? to the point where civilized discussion is no longer possible?

[Anonymous No.19034632]

>>19034576
if you think a company can take over bitcoin get the fuck out of crypto asap m8. because then it's all worthless.

[Anonymous No.19034647]

Just post Adam Back is Satoshi Nakmoto on r/bitcoin and you will get permanently bannedin a minute by Greg Maxwell.

Bitcoin is fucking comprimised beyond belief and when bitcoin collapses every coin fucking collapses.

[Anonymous No.19034651]

>>19034632
did you even watch the video? if not then retard confirmed. blockstream kiked the shit out of the bitcoin movement and implemented "upgrades" that crippled its scaling ability.

[Anonymous No.19034667]

>>19034651
Kiked beyond belief lol.

Bitcoin is a jewish honeypot designed to lure people away from gold and silver.

[Anonymous No.19034671]

>>19034651
dude if they can take over bitcoin once they can do it twice or as many times as they want to. get out while you can! get out asap! and forget about crypto! it's dead to you.

i personally don't think blockstream matters to bitcoin if they disappeared form the face of the earth tomorrow bitcoin woudln't even notice. but if you think otherwise just get out! it's fucked. over.

[Anonymous No.19034670]

>>19034647
if it collapses because it's outed as an usurper of another rightful fork, the other fork should take its place. it is, after all, just a better bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.19034684]

>>19034667
>A large percentage of bitcoin enthusiaists are libertarians.

kek that's why they ban people in less then a minute for posting 'ADAM BACK IS SATOSHI NAKAMOTO'

This shit is a ponzi scheme.

[Anonymous No.19034699]

>>19034671
that's also retard tier reasoning. it was a massive effort to take over BTC core and frankly amazing that they pulled it off. it has no chance of working again with a community that's already extremely wary of being kiked. fool me once shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.

[Anonymous No.19034720]

>>19034684
so if a jannie starts banning shitcoiners on /biz/ then it's a kike conspiracy and bitcoin is centralized? because if i was a janitor i would delete the fuck out of the sv cuck threads out of spite. doesn't mean i'm against open discussion about scaling or bitcoin as technology i just hate the creggies and would like to frustrate them. humans are fallible.

[Anonymous No.19034728]

>>19034720
if a jannie was banning discussion about the bitcoin movement getting kiked that would be a red flag yes.

[Anonymous No.19034730]

>>19034699
they didn't take over anything tho it's all in your head. your perception is skewed because you are a cashie and you have a specific form of brain damage that makes you unable to comprehend consensus or participate in it.

[Anonymous No.19034733]

>>19034418
This is why we are so fucking bullish on PNK desu

[Anonymous No.19034742]

>>19034730
didnt even read past a few words, your kike tricks are useless against the white man. address the topic not me directly inferior.

[Anonymous No.19034747]

holy fuck the shills are full on abandoning btc.

[Anonymous No.19034748]

>>19034728
see, but it would just be me a human being that is too weak to uphold his own ideals high on a power trip.

[Anonymous No.19034753]

>>19034748
seething

[Anonymous No.19034756]

>>19034488
Checked

[Anonymous No.19034759]

>>19034742
hehe i know you read it and i also know it hurts becasue you know it's true.

[Anonymous No.19034763]

>>19034759
ir ead it after posting and it was gay

[Anonymous No.19034767]

>>19034651
video link pls?

[Anonymous No.19034771]

>>19034767
https://youtu.be/XfcvX0P1b5g

[Anonymous No.19034779]

>>19034605
To me the scaling wars are about power and control vs ideology. Bitcoin has been hijacked by people who do not abide to any ideology other than power and control. They see Bitcoin as a way to enforce power and control. So I guess in a way it is a battle of two very different ideologies.

[Anonymous No.19034782]

>>19034763
sorry for your brain damage cashie i truly am. there is no helping you i tried for 3 fucking years. and i admit defeat.

[Anonymous No.19034785]

>>19034771
thank you anon

[Anonymous No.19034787]

>>19034782
ok get in the oven

[Anonymous No.19034797]

>>19034747
I am not shilling anything you retard.

[Anonymous No.19034813]

>>19034779
bollocks, the war is between on-chain and off-chain scaling. the war is about burden and who bears it and about centralization to what degree and how bitcoin can be centralized to not lose it's core properties that make it special: trustless permissionless and secure byzantine fault tolerant distributed ledger that is publicly auditable.

[Anonymous No.19034818]

to be clear i still think blockstream's grip on bitcoin is powerful enough that it will win out, but bcash was always pretty obviously the less subverted fork. fuck sv creg is a tard tho.

would be nice if more people learned about blockstream kikery, hopefully the video gets more eyeballs on it

[Anonymous No.19034856]

>>19034818
it's impossible to hold hostage an open source software or ideas. it takes about 5 minutes for an other dev team to form and take over development. all it requires is consensus about the changes. segwit 2x had consensus at first then blockstream devs pointed out it's full of critical bugs and worse than playing russian roulette. the devs of segwit 2x went on with their forks and due to bugs the chain came to a standstill. after that a lot of people realized that fucking with the consensus algo is dangerous as fuck and the influence of blockstream devs grew. they basically saved bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.19034874]

>>19034856
that might be a good argument if bcash wasn't a perfectly functional fork that didn't run into any of the scary issues that blockstream fud was warning about

[Anonymous No.19034885]

>>19034797
you're shilling the adam back is satoshi
and this new division between gmax, btc

it's been 3 years and I've never seen you astroturfing shills concede anything negative about btc, blockstream, maxwell or r/bitcoin.
The halving must have marked a point of no return for you communists.
Imagine thinking you can set up shop in bch and remain relevant.
It is going to be absolutely glorious watching btc crash and burn this year

[Anonymous No.19034895]

Satoshi is a black man

[Anonymous No.19034898]

>>19034895
ur mom is a black man

[Anonymous No.19034953]

>>19034874
i'm not saying it's impossible to change consensus algo i'm saying it's dangerous as fuck and blockstream devs appreciate this. they also appreciate the consequences of a fuck up more than you do. you make a shitfork and it dies: nobody cares. you fuck up bitcoin: the entire ecosystem and technology will suffer.

i would argue that you have to be a 100 times more careful about changing bitcoin than say bcash.

that said no change is not an option. bitcoin will dies if thy do not increase the base block size soon. i just hope they make it self adjusting and or automatic and not rely on constant hardforks like the cash forks.

as for unlimited blocks it obviously works as an alternative economically for miners but it makes the network vulnerable to dos attacks and increases the global burden for no reason while removing the financial incentive from fees to miners. bitcoin miners get 1 to 6.25 a very appreciable amount in fees. after the next halving they could get 50-50 from fees and subsidy. will bcash miners get 50-50 from fees after the next halving? i don't think so. think about that a bit!

[Anonymous No.19035022]

>>19034953
sensible arguments and i agree broadly with you, but they fucked up hard by trying to censor and control community discussions about technical direction, (probably) sabotaging competing nodes and generally being kikes. if bitcoin is tied to their reputation and they lose control of the narrative (which might now happen) then bitcoin is in the shit anyway. all because they wanted to siphon off fees and be in charge through what i can only succinctly refer to as "kikery" rather than merit

[Anonymous No.19035030]

>NOOOO, YOU SEEEE, BTC IS CENTRALIZED BECAUSE MY ACCOUNT GOT BANNED ON PLEBBIT WHILE POSTING IRRELEVANT AND UNCONFIRMED STUFF ABOUT SATOSHI NAKAMOTO IDENTITY
t. retard posting on heavily moderated forums while ranting against the most attacked (and resilient) asset ever by gov and kikes

[Anonymous No.19035047]

>>19035030
panicking kike

[Anonymous No.19035053]

>>19035022
>they fucked up hard by trying to censor and control community discussions about technical direction
make a BIP and wait for community response, without trying hostile takeovers and hard forks like XT, BCH or BSV

[Anonymous No.19035055]

>>19034953
>i would argue that you have to be a 100 times more careful about changing bitcoin than say bcash.
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
>We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures
implements segwit

[Anonymous No.19035064]

>>19035053
what did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.19035070]

Nah, Im not (or ever was) a government worker.
I used to do government work (for the NSA through a subcontractor) though.

Now I just spend my time buying expensive shit and browsing the internet.

[Anonymous No.19035094]

lmao he's going full damage control on twitter

kinda based that he's found a way to get all that cash without selling any btc tho ngl

[Anonymous No.19035174]

>>19034357
Adam Back is reference #6 in bitcoin whitepaper.
Sure nobody has ever checked his bio.
It’s over corekeks

[Anonymous No.19035192]

>>19034357
Of course
The CIA has had its paws on the American tech industry for decades
Check out In-Q-tel

[Anonymous No.19035202]

>>19034953
ddos will be quite expensive

[Anonymous No.19035250]

>>19035202
not really, listen a miner can include transactions for free. but even a non mining node can execute a dos attack be block extension.

nobody can check the hash on a binary stream not fully downloaded. think about that!

[Anonymous No.19035266]

>>19035055
please nigga don't be retarded!
not this shit again... segwit has signatures in the witness so no signatures have been removed, and bitcoin was never a chain of signatures since it's first release. your shallow interpretation of the whitepaper (which is not bitcoin) is retarded.

[Anonymous No.19035309]

Don't let the door hit you on the way out...

[Anonymous No.19035335]

>>19034357
blackpilled as fuck rn

[Anonymous No.19035346]

>>19035266
>a hash of a signature is a signature
nope
> the whitepaper (which is not bitcoin)
god I love it
>it's important for me to say segwit didn't remove signatures but bitcoin was never a chain of signatures
you cunts are so dumb

[Anonymous No.19035407]

>>19034488

The censorship of the video on Reddit (with the exception of /r/btc, which is a forum for free-speech) does not necessarily prove the Adam Back identification. Even if that identification is false, the video is going to make millions of people aware that Bitcoin BTC was destroyed by Blockstream. That it fundamentally cannot scale without centralization and the complete loss of privacy. There is a reason why the mainstream media loves Bitcoin BTC. It is an extremely dangerous weapon which will enslave humanity if it continues to grow. Even now, it diverts capital and attention away from assets which really threaten the banks, like precious metals, or crypto like BCH and XMR.

https://blog.plan99.net/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7

https://medium.com/@johnblocke/a-brief-and-incomplete-history-of-censorship-in-r-bitcoin-c85a290fe43

https://medium.com/@johnblocke/r-bitcoin-censorship-revisited-58d5b1bdcd64

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

https://medium.com/scalar-capital/the-bitcoin-cash-story-e55b277491f9

https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/12-reasons-bitcoin-cash-is-the-real-bitcoin-8d5547988374

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/89z483/ama_ask_mike_anything/

https://txstreet.com/beta

[Anonymous No.19035429]

>>19035266
>bitcoin was never a chain of signatures since it's first release
wut?
you do understand that you sign your transactions, right?
>the whitepaper (which is not bitcoin)
hi greg. blockstream surely isn't the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.19036043]

>>19034357
So why did he set up a for profit entity when he could have just been rich from BTC? Shit makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.19036083]

>>19036043
Lack of a figurehead makes it easy to avoid criticism and accountability.

[Anonymous No.19036130]

>>19035346
you are dumb as fuck, please educate yourself:

P2WPKH nested in BIP16 P2SH

witness: <signature> <pubkey>
scriptSig: <0 <20-byte-key-hash>>
(0x160014{20-byte-key-hash})
scriptPubKey: HASH160 <20-byte-script-hash> EQUAL
(0xA914{20-byte-script-hash}87)

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki

also anything could adhere to the bitcoin whitepaper you could make a billion implementations one more literal than the other none of them would be bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.19036148]

>>19035429
>wut?
>you do understand that you sign your transactions, right?
no you don't have so sign transactions as a general rule. you have to provide a correct unlock script that executes to true, which script may or may not require signature(s).

[Anonymous No.19036178]

>>19036130
imagine posting that as evidence to your point.
Are you just trying to send people mad with how shit your arguments are?

[Anonymous No.19036180]

>>19035346
>>19035429
here is a multi choice question:
what can you spend as per the bitcoin protocol?
a) signatures, bitcoin is a chain of signatures so i can spend signatures with signatures
b) an unspent transaction output provided you add a valid unlock script that executes to true
c) i'm a cashie retard so the whitepaper!

please answer!

[Anonymous No.19036203]

>>19036178
if you can't find the signature in a segwit tx when your nose is rubbed into it literally, i can't help you...

[Anonymous No.19036321]

>>19036180
>we define a coin as utxo
what percentage of people will believe that you moron, why do you do what you do
>>19036203
if you think making this argument helps you, then I can't help you.
Why are you cunts so dumb, it's absolutely ridiculous. The person that thinks a hash of a signature is a signature is not someone with any money

[Anonymous No.19036334]

imagine thinking this c.uck is satoshi nakamoto

ahahahaha

disgusting kike shilling blockstream imaginary token with samson the c.uck

[Anonymous No.19036412]

>>19034488
false flag
they know their little shill circlejerk is dead

[Anonymous No.19036448]

HAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.19036692]

It's true. The future of Bitcoin is smaller blocks and slower transaction times since all the shit you retards care about like transaction times doesn't matter at all. What's important is reliability, things like the network surviving even if the internet goes down.

[Anonymous No.19036716]

>>19036321
so you admit to have no clue how bitcoin actually works? okay.
>The person that thinks a hash of a signature is a signature is not someone with any money
so you are blind as well as stupid. okay.

[Anonymous No.19036741]

> btc jew
> btc bad
> shiny metal good
Even if George Soros was satoshi , you brainlets obviously cannot comprehent what open source means and the transparency blockchain provides because you are technologicaly illiterate, so you premitive mind races to conspiracy theories ,the algorithm is concrete logic and cannot be manipulated , if you want deeper insight open a fucking book and do a code review instead of drowning in your conspiracy theories and chooking on for profit institutions thats be scamming you since the bronze age

[Anonymous No.19036746]

>>19036741
>you brainlets obviously cannot comprehent
gtfo

[Anonymous No.19036808]

>>19036741
well said anon

[Anonymous No.19036889]

>>19036746
go consume shitty conspiracies made by basement dwellers with no tech background instead of proof reading the codebase dump fucking cuck

[Anonymous No.19036902]

>>19036889
calm down moron

[Anonymous No.19036936]

>>19036741
The algorithm can't be manipulated but it's still one-CPU-one-vote (technically more like one GPU/ASIC now but that was the original description Satoshi used in the Bitcoin whitepaper and it still works as an analogy), so power is centered around those who can afford the most computing power. Proof-of-Stake can in theory reduce this risk.

I don't read /biz/ due to all the retards and conspiracy theories you mention, and I don't even follow Bitcoin much in recent years, but concerns over a single organization or nation controlling too much of the network's hash rate can be warranted. Certain types of attacks can have some practical probability of succeeding even if they control well under 50%.

[Anonymous No.19037100]

bcashers desperate again LOL

[Anonymous No.19037194]

>>19034439
Childish take. Whenever you attribute a value to the concept of reality, that right there is the most ideological move possible.

[Anonymous No.19037484]

ITT: Whiny faggots who cannot handle a free market when it is operational.

Don't like Bitcoin? Fuck off to SV or Cash.
Don't like le Bitcoin subleddit? Fuck off and make your own, or go to Voat, or make your own forum.
Don't like greg neckbeard and adam kike? Make your own fucking fork of Bitcoin.

This is just it, all of you faggots are bitching about how the problem is Bitcoin's regulation, when really you are just saying you want to impose your own set of regulations over it instead. That's what you really want: other regulations. If you want a free market, it's right fucking there for you to use. Stop asking to be validated by Blocksteam or Reddit. They're not authorities in any of this. They offer their version of their ecosystems and you do or do not participate in accordance with whether it suits your vision. What you are asking for is for your worse ideas to be more popular. Tough shit. If it's a better idea, people will want it. If you can't handle this, then there is a currency you can get into where a central authority tells you exactly what you can and can't have so you don't have to make any decisions for yourself, it's called the US Dollar. Feel free to invest accordingly or otherwise shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.19037565]

>>19034357
>cia glowie
the dudes an anarchocaptialist who has done more for human freedom during his life than you are capable of....let that sink in 85 iq fuckface

[Anonymous No.19037570]

>>19037484
so much angry bullshit and yet you're saying nothing. maybe it is you who is the one who should shut up. i doubt anyone will bother to read that wall of asspained text you spent 5 minutes typing up

[Anonymous No.19037585]

>>19036741
BASED
>>19037484
BASED
/thread

[Anonymous No.19037593]

>>19037585
cucked

[Anonymous No.19037701]

>>19037593
the point is that you can scream and rant all you want, but at the end of the day we are free to choose which chain to support and we obviously use bitcoin because it's the most resilient and secure coin out there
if you are a cashie we don't care, stick with your shitfork and shove it up your ass
you wake up in the morning and either jian wu, either faketoshi will come up with some retarded idea like dev tax or coin seizure from utxo (that's craig plan), with btc we do not have any of these stupid problems

[Anonymous No.19037718]

>>19037701
thanks just bought more BCH

[Anonymous No.19037740]

>>19037718
great, stick with your "bitmain cash" and stop spreading bullshit

[Anonymous No.19037743]

i just dont get whats wrong when the technology is open source and you can just make your own version ffs most of u are really fucking dumb

[Anonymous No.19037764]

>>19034488
Nice drop anon

[Anonymous No.19037788]

>>19037743
there's a video going around that highlights a bunch of underhanded bullshit perpetrated by this gay company called blockstream, they censored and banned a FUCK TON of people on reddit and bitcointalk so they could implement a retarded scaling upgrade that crippled bitcoin and let them claim more fees. check out https://youtu.be/XfcvX0P1b5g
https://blog.plan99.net/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7
for more info

[Anonymous No.19037878]

>>19037788
>they censored and banned a FUCK TON of people on reddit and bitcointalk
who fucking cares, make your own forum, make your own subreddit, stop whining abuot moderated forums
and if you try to pull a hostile takeover don't expect us to cooperate, we will anally rape you straight away without vaseline
do you have some improvement to propose? make a BIP and wait for the consensus, of course not all BIPs can be approved, many of them where from core devs and they were rejected

[Anonymous No.19037931]

>>19037878
>jannies have the power to decide what is right and wrong
your argument is so shit it is self defeating

[Anonymous No.19038002]

>>19037931
no, fucking retard, my argument is that if you use a moderated forum for communication you will get censored at some point, so you should not rely on these tools at all
use something that cannot be stopped
https://ndm-inf.github.io/ndm/main
or
https://blockchan.ca/
or even 4chan, you get banned or censured, restart the router and keep going

[Anonymous No.19038003]

>>19034450

This is interesting way to put It, thx

[Anonymous No.19038029]

>>19034357

Imagine having this many claims and credentials but still being old and bald. This guy corner-smiles like he thinks hes a rockstar

[Anonymous No.19038045]

>>19038002
im not clicking that shit. but yes i agree with this post, blockstream out kiked the freetards. doesn't mean you should be happy about it you fucking KEK

[Anonymous No.19038091]

>>19034720
you've already lost

[Anonymous No.19038096]

>>19034418

[Anonymous No.19038135]

>>19038029
He created Bitcoin. He will end up being the richest human ever on planet earth. So yea, he’s kind of a rockstar.

[Anonymous No.19038150]

>>19034720
THIS POST IS INCREDIBLY BASED AND UNDERRATED

[Anonymous No.19038303]

>>19038091
yeah because craig revealed the fatal flaw in segwit in 2018 and bchsv went to $1200 by 2019 eoy then he received his bitcoins in 2020 january from the bondage courier and he dumped all his btc last ight into the halving crashing btc price to double digits...

i so lost. ahahahahah
just grow a fucking braincell!

[Anonymous No.19038372]

>>19034357
>Satoshi Nakamoto is a CIA glow nigger.

I doubt it

[Anonymous No.19038419]

>>19037484
nah, I don't think I'll shut up

[Anonymous No.19038439]

>>19038303
>yeah because craig revealed the fatal flaw in segwit in 2018 and bchsv went to $1200 by 2019 eoy then he received his bitcoins in 2020 january from the bondage courier and he dumped all his btc last ight into the halving crashing btc price to double digits...
kino, i'm gonna copy-pasta this

[Anonymous No.19038562]

>>19034576

BCH did not lose because of a coordinated fud effort or bots— thats paranoid. It lost because it got the BCH ticker and so to every average person putting their money into the market in 2017 it looked like a ripoff of BTC. Remember that it takes a lot of education in the technical workings of crypto to understand the pedantic but meaningful differences between btc and bch. But for people who invest for superficial reasons, which is everyone, name is everything. There is only one BTC.

[Anonymous No.19038654]

>>19038562
>BCH did not lose
BCH did not win or lose, Bitmain just forked off their own version because they wanted to continue using ASICBOOST exploit
BCH was never about block size

[Anonymous No.19038729]

>>19038654
Woke

[Anonymous No.19038754]

>>19038562
>>19038654
all this cope doesn't change anything.
block stream used jannies to force a non caleable version of bitcoin and it didn't stand the test of time in 2017/8 when network usage maxed out and the whole ponzi died
if big blocks/bcash was the dominant fork then things owuld have turned out differently and bitcoin would be at 200k right now. craig is a fat fuck that came on the scene at november 2018 and can be safely nignored
PROVE ME WRONG

[Anonymous No.19038914]

>>19038754
>all this cope doesn't change anything.
it's just facts you can easily verify by your own
>block stream used jannies to force a non caleable version of bitcoin
listen, we have different ideas, i think luke 300kb block proposal is fucking based, people are stopping their full nodes at increasing rate and this is a systemic risk
scaling on layer 1 is a meme, it's like building internet without ISO/OSI and relying on physical layer for webapps
increasing the block size is stupid, it's just kicking the can down the road while increasing centralization because nodes will disappear

[Anonymous No.19038940]

>>19038914
fuck jannies and fuck redditors.

[Anonymous No.19038972]

>>19038940
fuck jannies, fuck redditors
AND FUCK DELUSIONAL BCASHIES who cannot stand a discussion and whine about everything when someone doesn't agree with their stupid ideas

[Anonymous No.19039000]

>>19038972
seethe

[Anonymous No.19039013]

>>19034450
Progress is a spook

[Anonymous No.19039025]

>>19039000
also checkem. blockstream KIKES

[Anonymous No.19039192]

>>19039000
lmao, VC are throwing money left and right, they even bought several scams
Blockstream getting some VC funds seems pretty normal, considering they are maintaining btc core, mobile wallets, btc via satellite and sidechains...
That's literally how you run tech companies in 2020

[Anonymous No.19039219]

>>19039192
it's a shame their shitty tech is failing hard then innit

[Anonymous No.19039269]

>>19039219
if their layer2 and sidechain solutions will fail someone else will succeed, could not care less
but btc is working as intended, nobody cares about paying a coffee with it

[Anonymous No.19039300]

>>19034357
surely this will be the end of BitCoin and Craig Wright

[Anonymous No.19039318]

>>19039269
can't argue with that, converting to fiat is easy and instant nowadays. i guess we'll see how it fares if interest picks up in coming months/years. in the meantime i'm keeping as many bch as i am btc

[Anonymous No.19039613]

>>19034490
Look at the mining you retard. Large Chinese mining ops have gobbled up tons of hashrate from small miners. This means that control of Bitcoin is being centralized and China controls it. Bitcoin fucking dead, PoW is dead.

[Anonymous No.19040601]

adam back being satoshi is incredibly bullish.
onchain scaling is for brainlets

[Anonymous No.19040606]

>>19038439
please fix my typos!