CHAINLINK IS OFFICIALLY BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTIC!

[Anonymous No.18952172]

ANY BLOCKCHAIN CAN USE THE CHAINLINK NETWORK NOW!!!

ALSO CONFIRMED BY JONNY, CHAINLINK DOESN'T RELY ON SOLIDITY ANYMORE!

VITALIK ON FUCKING SUICIDE WATCH!

>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/external-initiator
>https://twitter.com/chainlink_alert/status/1258755171645087745

[Anonymous No.18952180]

>>18952172
Token not needed is now offficial!!!!

[Anonymous No.18952192]

>>18952172
DR ; Sold for LOKI.

[Anonymous No.18952193]

>>18952172
Is 5k enough to make it

[Anonymous No.18952196]

>>18952180
chainlink nodes are paid in link

[Anonymous No.18952204]

Sir Gay betrayed us all, we were supposed to be all in this together

[Anonymous No.18952217]

>>18952172
>$3.71

[Anonymous No.18952219]

>>18952172
is 7k enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.18952227]

This is rubbish, nobody will fall for this. Nobody will use this scam coin

[Anonymous No.18952258]

>>18952196
There are no LINK tokens on Tezos blockchain so how the fuck would that work?

[Anonymous No.18952260]

>>18952172
Tokens are still on ETH
ETH and LINK remain frens

[Anonymous No.18952273]

>>18952172
Link is the best 3.75 stablecoin I’ve ever bought.

[Anonymous No.18952297]

>>18952219
how does 7$ eoy sound?

[Anonymous No.18952327]

>>18952172
If you read the whitepaper you would not be so bullish kek

[Anonymous No.18952331]

>>18952172
>everyone can use
>no one wants to

[Anonymous No.18952338]

>>18952258
they are going to be paid in xtz. Nodes can later sell that xtz for link.

[Anonymous No.18952388]

Nice try Johann, no one cares about chainlink

[Anonymous No.18952415]

>>18952196
But they don't have to be. The token is not needed.

[Anonymous No.18952416]

>>18952193
In 2023/4 yes.

[Anonymous No.18952519]

true if big
>>18952172

[Anonymous No.18952618]

>>18952258
link token isnt needed

[Anonymous No.18952684]

LINK is dead you fucking loser. Doubled my money on that piece of shit and never touching it again.

[Anonymous No.18952722]

>>18952172
this is still centralized. still no need to care. you can write a web client to poll for price information in a non-shit language no problem. it's doing it in a trustless way that's the actual hard part. linktards are nowhere near solving that, and for now you can act like switching out a programming language to do something trivial in a centralized way is some kind of breakthrough but it's just COPE at this point.

[Anonymous No.18952745]

>>18952722
go tell that to tezos dev, that literally dropped their own implementation of a shitty oracle like the one you propose to use chainlink

[Anonymous No.18952767]

Sergey buy ipad

[Anonymous No.18952810]

>>18952172
> Makes game changing announcement on a discord channel to a very limited audience.
When will linkies ever learn?

[Anonymous No.18952945]

>>18952745
How are these tokens worth over a billion, whole team is millionaires and they're less professional than twitch streamers. Doesn't make any sense.

[Anonymous No.18952976]

>>18952172
That means token is no longer required you inbreds. Sell before the inevitable dump

[Anonymous No.18953033]

>>18952172
it's literary dumping rn

[Anonymous No.18953059]

>>18952180
This fud is smart, its not good fud, but its not bad fud either.

[Anonymous No.18953072]

They deleted their tezos stablecoin tweet

[Anonymous No.18953080]

>>18952172

How arrogant and stupid are the LINKcels to be trash talking the only smart contract platform that actually matters?

This is why you are hated.

This is why you will lose.

[Anonymous No.18953108]

>>18952172
dumping

[Anonymous No.18953116]

>>18952172
Yet coleterall is link rc20 toekn THE ABSOLUTE STATE

[Anonymous No.18953117]

>>18953080
No one is even talking shit about Eth in here. Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.18953129]

80%

[Anonymous No.18953211]

>>18953117

It's implied in their stupid tweets.

There is NO OTHER smart contract platform that has the commercial interest, research and development and ecosystem and support.

What, you faggots are going to be running your NEET nodes verifying transactions on centralized zombie chains like NEO, EOS?

Are you fucking kidding me?

You fucking cunt, go sit in your corner.

[Anonymous No.18953285]

>>18953211
>t. have no idea what Corda or Hyperledger is

[Anonymous No.18953304]

>>18953211
What? Why are you trying to argue about this?

[Anonymous No.18953344]

>>18953304
Why does the Jew subvert?

[Anonymous No.18953599]

>>18952945
>>18952976
>>18952415
>>18952618
>>18952260
>>18952180
Here is the answer from Jonny

[Anonymous No.18953789]

>>18952684
Only doubled his money on Link. Lol

[Anonymous No.18953999]

>>18953599
>wrapped link
fudders permanently btfo

[Anonymous No.18954000]

>>18953211
Hi Bertolino, fuck off

[Anonymous No.18954031]

>>18953999
checked, now fudders incoming with
>BUT THE WRAPPED LINK ISN'T THE REAL CHAINLINK TOKEN LOLOLOL

[Anonymous No.18954034]

>>18953285
>hyperledger literally amde eth bride to piggyback kek

[Anonymous No.18954135]

>>18954031
Oh boi, I want to buy some wrapped linkies my self. That shit is gonna mooon.

[Anonymous No.18954166]

>>18952193
Depends, however does $4-6k depending on time of sale sound?

[Anonymous No.18954192]

>>18953599
>max supply 1billion ON EACH BLOCKCHAIN

[Anonymous No.18954200]

still 80%

still interns shitposting ITT

still betrayed

[Anonymous No.18954289]

>>18954200
still dre

[Anonymous No.18954328]

>>18952745
>but X uses Chainlink
That doesn't matter. Typical deluded linkie, trying to float a name to try to add some credibility to the project, rather than actually address the glaringly obvious issue I mentioned.

[Anonymous No.18954354]

>>18954328
Cope harder
You're priced out shitskin

[Anonymous No.18954363]

>>18954328
Drown in the Ganges, street shitter.

[Anonymous No.18954364]

>>18952193
How does 5 billion dollars sound?

[Anonymous No.18954379]

>(((Chaim)))link

[Anonymous No.18954385]

>>18954354
>>18954363
So many mad linklets, so little counter arguments. Those bags getting heavy boys? :)

[Anonymous No.18954396]

>>18954385
My stack > your stack
Cope harder shitskin

[Anonymous No.18954597]

>>18954379
who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.18954707]

>>18952415

>2020
>not understanding the need for tokens
>believes autonomous smart contract inputs should be collateralized with ETH or USD stablecoins, which are based respectively on the whims of the rogue Federal Reserve and the usefulness/demand for the Ethereum virtual machine

The whole point of crypto is to stand independent of USD and centralized organizations that control fiat value. Also, news flash: ETH is not supposed to be currency. It specifically guarantees access to computation on the EVM, and its value is supposed to reflect the demand for the EVM.

Similarly, LINK's value is supposed to reflect and be determined by the demand for the use of Chainlink's oracle network. That is the only way the network can autonomously secure itself once crypto has exited its volatile speculative gold rush phase. Why would you want to collateralize your smart contracts with centrally-controlled fiat or some other token whose value fluctuates based on the demand for a completely unrelated service (use of EVM)?

[Anonymous No.18954814]

>>18952180
Exactly. Chainlinkers are going to neck themselves once they find out the token won't be used.

[Anonymous No.18954823]

>>18954707
this is the first high iq response in this thread

[Anonymous No.18954868]

>>18954814
it will be used through wrapped LINK read jonnys answer
here
>>18953599

[Anonymous No.18955037]

>>18953211

> But who was polkadot

[Anonymous No.18955216]

>>18954396
>not being able to address link being centralized, with no progress towards decentralization for years now.
>throwing slurs because you have nothing to rebuke it
>trying to make it about muh stack is bigger
>getting so mad as to post a screenshot of said stack
Somehow, I'm the one coping. Yeah, you keep telling yourself that buddy.

>>18954707
The difference is that at least someone had to mine the ETH. Link was just another ICO. And if you're worried about things being centrally controlled, why are you even using Link?

[Anonymous No.18955383]

>>18955216
what are IPOs?
are you implying that since Amazon stocks havn't been mined, Amazon is shit?
ICOs worck the same way as long as the founders of the company are trustable and have a real product.

[Anonymous No.18955452]

>>18953599
Oh my god they created another token. They're trying to replace LINK with WRAPLINK. SELL SELL SELL

[Anonymous No.18955537]

Don't own any link and part of me wants it to succeed for the meme (akin to da burrs winning the superb owl on /sp/) but at the same time this crashing hard would also be entertaining as hell.
Either way I'm following chainlink price down the line

[Anonymous No.18955571]

>>18952193
how does $0 sound?

[Anonymous No.18955626]

>>18952172
B A S E D
A
S
E
D

[Anonymous No.18955801]

>>18952193
how does 5 brrrrrRRRAAAAAPs sound?

[Anonymous No.18955841]

>>18954192

[Anonymous No.18955904]

>>18952180
>>18952196
>>18953059
>>18954814
The token is needed so that Chainlink can call information from a node at the same time it transfers to a node. The network cuts transactions in half that way. Only erc677s do this and Chainlink is the only one of those. Terrible fud. Learn to code

[Anonymous No.18955983]

>>18955216

Chainlink will be centralized until there is a critical mass of oracles as it is vulnerable to sybil attacks until then. Once that point is reached, anyone can have their NEET node, sybil attacks will be prohibitively expensive and difficult, and there will probably be some form of decentralized governance. Until that point I'd actually rather that the team be in control of the tokens--- everyone always talks about how mining is "fair" and good for the network. Mining only guarantees that the people with the most resources (electricity, computing power) accumulate the coins. It means coins possibly don't get into the hands of the people and organizations best suited to advance the interests of the network. Also access to those resources is highly geopolitically specific so it's not actually a "fair" method of distributing coins, just ends up being mostly chinese people at this point. In the case of Chainlink, the team can actively distribute the coins if they want (via OTC sales) to entities that they feel would benefit the network most. This active role in distributing the coins affords a key strategic advantage in developing the network.

However, the argument for me is less about the dangers of centralization than it is about having a service secured by a token specific to that service's microeconomy. USD or any other coin fluctuates based on many factors unrelated to Chainlink (war, politics, inflation, etc). As does ETH by different factors. It makes the network secure for it to have a coin--- used as payment and collateral within that network--- whose value is as proportional as possible to the demand for that particular network. That is the whole rationale for tokenization.

[Anonymous No.18956993]

>>18955216
>>18955216
Cope harder shitskin
I have more money than you = I'm more intelligent

[Anonymous No.18957970]

>>18955452
WRAPLINK, sounds so good :)

here is how thomas see it done (that was posted 1 year ago)

[Anonymous No.18957991]

>>18957970

[Anonymous No.18958042]

>>18957991

[Anonymous No.18958227]

>>18958042
>>18957991
>>18957970

This is huge. If the functionality takes off on any other chains, then the 1 bil LINK is no longer just divided up among ETH holders. Demand could go through the roof.

[Anonymous No.18958712]

Somebody redpill me in Tezos?
Should I buy more at the next dip?

[Anonymous No.18958762]

Who cares about chainlink anymore? theres no room to grow unless you got tens of thousands of dollars tied up in it. most of us have under 10k which means we need micros like VIDT and UBT to make it

[Anonymous No.18958785]

>>18958762
>Who cares about chainlink anymore?
Then why are you on a link thread?

[Anonymous No.18958810]

>>18955904
Bingo

[Anonymous No.18958824]

Fucking blessed by SMINEM himself
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_4pCgOH2et/

[Anonymous No.18958910]

I sold 1k link at 3.60 to buy esh at 0.6

[Anonymous No.18958921]

>>18952172
Big news!
I suppose it'll be accompanied by a nice price drop.
Because that's how ChainLink pricing economics works.

[Anonymous No.18958923]

>>18958227
So this means that the circulating supply can theoretically go even lower correct?

[Anonymous No.18959010]

Bogdanoffs post #42 is also here.
WE ARE ALL GONNA MAKE IT!
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_u0VaYIjAX/

[Anonymous No.18959051]

>>18958923
Yes, as LINK is locked up into nodes the less circulating supply there is causing the price of LINK to go up. Simply rules of supply and demand, this is why we have been bullish for Chainlink since 17

>>18958921
Good, more time to accumulate for those who dont already have a large stack.

>>18958910
No you didn't, but if you did I feel sorry for you.

[Anonymous No.18959169]

>>18958923
Yes brainlet. This is more bullish the all the last 6 months news combined

[Anonymous No.18959217]

>>18952180

hahahhaha this.

pathetic linkies it's over you delusional idiots

[Anonymous No.18960079]

>>18952219
How does 7 quintillion dollars sound?

[Anonymous No.18960087]

>>18958923

Yes. Even if LINK were only staked for Ethereum-based Dapps (whenever staking is introduced) its scarcity (and price) would climb and climb. Now it will happen at a much faster rate. It's ironic that any "Ethereum killer" that uses chainlink will essentially guarantee the continued primacy of Ethereum. Ethereum will continue to dominate, at the very least serving as a clearing area for Chainlink transactions, though probably also as the primary venue for smart contracts/dapps.

[Anonymous No.18960295]

Hheeyyy lmao where's the wrapped linkie condom memess